1
Electronic supplementary information (ESI)for
Solvent dispersion triggered the formation of NiFe-gel
as an efficient electrocatalyst for enhancing the
oxygen evolution reactionHongkai Wang, Weihuang Zhu, Qi Xue, Changhao Wang*, and Kaiqiang Liu*
aKey Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources, Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education,
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China.
bKey Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry, Ministry of Education, School of
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, P. R. China
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for ChemComm.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
2
Experimental Section
Materials
Iron (III) chloride (FeCl3), cobalt (II) chloride (CoCl2) ethanol (≥99.5%),
propylene oxide (≥99%) were purchased from shanghai Macklin Biochemical
Co. Ltd. Nickel (II) chloride hexahydrate (NiCl2·6H2O) (98%) was bought
from Energy Chemical (Shanghai, China), Saturated Calomel Electrode was
purchased from IDA Corporation (Tianjin). All the chemicals are commercially
sourced and used without further purification.
Synthesis of NiFe-gel
The NiFe-gel catalysts were synthesized by solvent dispersion-triggered
gelation reported. Firstly, FeCl3 (0.45 mmol), and NiCl2·6H2O (0.9 mmol) were
dissolved in ethanol (1 mL) in one tube, simultaneously. And another tube is
loaded with deionized water (DI) (0.1 mL) mixed with ethanol (1.0 mL).
Secondly, the two tubes were put into the water bath at a constant temperature
(4 oC) for 1~2 hours. During the stirring, a clear solution was formed rather
than a gel. Thirdly, the precursor solution was mixed with the ethanol-water
mixture and efficiently stirred. Then the mixed solution was transferred into a
vial sealed by the foil paper with some small holes. Finally, the vial was put
into a lager vial filled with propylene oxide (≈2 mL) and the larger via was
sealed. After 12 hours, a brown gel was formed, and the liquid above the gel
was exchanged to acetone in order to absorb organic solvent inside the gel. The
acetone exchanged was preceded efficiently and the gel was overnight freeze-
dried for the following measurements.
Characterization methods
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on Bruker D8 Advance
diffractometer, (Germany) with a scan rate of 10o per minute in the 2θ range
from 5o to 70o. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) was used for mass-specific
surface areas measurement and the result obtained by analyzing nitrogen
3
adsorption and desorption isotherms. The isotherm analysis in the relative
pressure was used to obtain the total surface areas of the catalysts.
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray
Spectroscopy (EDX) characterization were conducted with Field Transmittance
Electron Microscope (Tecnai G2 F20, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS,
AXIS ULTRA) were used for the material composition investigation of the
samples. Inductive Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer (ICP, Bruker M90)
was used to detect the elemental composition of the catalysts. Freeze-drying
procedure was recorded with the model of FD8-6P (GLOD-SIM).
Electrochemical characterization
The electrocatalytic properties of the samples were performed using a three-
electrode system connected to an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660D) at
30±1 oC. A Glassy-Carbon Electrode (GCE) (diameter: 3 mm, area: 0.072 cm2)
was used as a working electrode with a sample modified on it. After polished in
alpha alumina powders mixed in deionized water on a Nylon polishing pad, the
GCE was washed in deionized water and ethanol. A Calomel electrode and
carbon rod Calomel electrode were used as the reference electrode and the
counter electrode, individually.
The working electrode was prepared by the following steps. First, 4 mg of
the sample was dissolved in 1 mL mixture of water and ethanol (4:1, v/v), with
70 μL Nafion (5 wt % in water). Then 5 μL of the above solution was dropped
onto the GCE surface and left to dry in air. Before the measurement, the 1
mol/L KOH solution was bubbled with N2 for 15 min. The scan rate of the CV
measurements remained at 50 mV s-1 and 1 mV s-1 for OER polarization curves.
After 20-cycle CV scanning, the EIS test was performed in 1 mol/L KOH. The
current signals were remained at amplitude of 4 mV, and the frequency scan
was determined from 100 mHz to 100 kHz (All test conditions are guaranteed
to be carried out at temperatures around 25 oC).
The TOF (Turnover frequency) values of the catalysts for OER were
4
calculated by the following equation.
n4FJATOF
J means current density at an overpotential of 0.3 V in A (0.072 cm-2), A is
the geometric area of GCE (0.072 cm2), F is the Faraday constant; n is the mole
number of cobalt and iron atoms on the electrode.
5
Table S1. Performance comparison of different methods for NiFe catalyst.
Reference MaterialsOverpotential at 10 mA cm-2
(mV)BET (m2 g-1)
Onset potential(V)
Tafel (mV dec −1)η= b log (j / j0)
This work NiFe-gel 245 216.9 1.41 50
1 NiFe-LDH 350 60 1.58 47
2 Fe-Ni(OH)2/NF 267 - - 51.5
3NiFe–NiCoO2
polyhedron286 - - 49.3
4 NiFe2O4 381 6.60 1.48 46.5
5 NiFeOx 350 - - -
6 Ni5Fe1/RGO 245 80.04 1.46 -
7 Fe0.5Ni0.5Ox 584 38.4 1.63 72
8 Ni2FeCo-LDH 420 85.41 1.53 78.7
9 NiFe-LDH 210 - - 40
10Ni0.75Fe0.25O
OH200 - - -
11 NiFe-NM@G 208 - - -
12Ni2Fe1
nanometer pearl necklaces
240 - - -
13 NiFe−VM−O 371 - 1.53 28
14 Fe2Ni
MOF/NF222 - - 42.4
15 FeNiP-NP 180 7.53 1.35 76
16Ni0.75Fe0.25Se2
@NF210 - - 39.4
Note: Symbol - refers to no measurements in the corresponding references.
6
Table S2. ICP measurements for various NixFe gels.
Atomic ratio Ni0.7Fe-gel Ni1.0Fe-gelNi1.5Fe -
gelNi2.0Fe-gel Ni2.5Fe-gel
Fe (%) 52 44 36 31 27
Ni (%) 38 42 52 60 63
Experimental
ratio of Ni/Fe0.73:1 0.95:1 1.44:1 1.94:1 2.33:1
Theoretical ratio
of Ni:Fe0.70:1 1.00:1 1.50:1 2.00:1 2.50:1
7
Table S3. pH change with time upon addition of propylene oxide
Solvent pH change with time upon addition of propylene oxide0 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min
H2O + Ethanol pH = 7.66 pH = 7.89 pH = 8.11 pH = 8.25 pH = 8.44
Notes: The ethanol-water mixture is pure solvent without dissolving two metal precursors.
8
Fig. S1. a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm curve of the Ni2.0Fe-gel, b) Pore size distribution of
the Ni2.0Fe-gel.
9
Fig. S2. XRD and EDX patterns of the Ni2.0Fe-gel.
10
Fig. S3. a) EDX and b) XRD measurements for various NixFe gels.
11
Fig. S4. OER polarization curves of Ni2.0Fe-gel, Ni- and Fe-gels.
12
Fig. S5. XPS characterizations of Ni2.0Fe-gel, Ni-gel and Fe-gel.
13
Fig. S6. The theoretical oxygen production and oxygen content collected of Ni2.0Fe-gel in 1M
KOH at 0.95 V for 60 min.
14
Fig. S7. a) LSV polarization curves and b) Stability measurementat of Ni2.0Fe-gel and
commercial RuO2.
15
Fig S8. Stability test for Ni2.0Fe-gel in 0.1M KOH and 1M KOH electrolyte.
16
Fig. S9. The TEM image of Ni2.0Fe-gels (a) before 8 hours of stability test, (b) after 8 hours of
stability test
17
Fig. S10. Tafel curves of Ni2.0Fe-gel and RuO2.
18
Fig. S11. Gel-method and solution-method with or without addition of propylene oxide during the
synthesis of the catalysts.
19
Fig. S12. TEM images of the materials from a) solution method, b) dropping propylene oxide into
the solution, c) infiltrating propylene oxide into the solution.
20
Fig. S13. XRD of the resulting materials from a) the gel-method, b) the solution-method
21
Fig. S14. Effect of propylene oxide on the performance of the gel catalyst. Gel method (1): infiltrating propylene oxide into the solution; Gel method (2): dropping propylene oxide into the solution; solution method: without addition of propylene oxide.
22
Fig. S15. Possible gelation mechanism triggered by the dispersion of propylene oxide into the
aqueous solution of two metal precursors.
23
Notes and references
[1] K. Yan, T. Lafleur, J. Chai and C. Jarvis, Electrochem. Commun., 2016, 62, 24-28.
[2] J. Liu, Y. Zheng, Z. Wang, Z. Lu, A. Vasileff and S. Z. Qiao, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54,
463-466.
[3] R. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Wang, T. Li and Y. F. Song, J. Energy Chem., 2019, 33, 74-80.
[4] V. Maruthapandian, M. Mathankumar, V. Saraswathy, B. Subramanian and S. Muralidharan,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 13132-13141.
[5] C. C. McCrory, S. Jung, J. C. Peters and T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135,
16977-16987.
[6] D. H. Youn, Y. B. Park, J. Y. Kim, G. Magesh, Y. J. Jang and J. S. Lee, J. Power Sour., 2015,
294, 437-443.
[7] J. Jiang, C. Zhang and L. Ai, Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 208, 17-24.
[8] L. Qian, Z. Lu, T. Xu, X. Wu, Y. Tian, Y. Li, Z. Huo, X. Sun and X. Duan, Adv. Energy
Mater., 2015, 5, 1500245.
[9] F. Song and X. Hu, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 4477.
[10] L. Trotochaud, S. L. Young, J. K. Ranney and S. W. Boettcher, J. Appl. Cham. Sci., 2014,
136, 6744-6753.
[11] J. Zhang, W. J. Jiang, S. Niu, H. T. Zhang, J. Liu, H. T. Li, G. F. Huang, L. Jiang, W. Q.
Huang, J. S. Hu and W. P. Hu, Adv. Mater., 2020, 1906015.
[12] J. Zhang, M. Zhang, L. Qiu, Y. Zeng, J. Chen, C. Zhu, Y. Yu and Z. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. A.,
2019, 7, 19045-19059.
[13] H. J. Lee, S. Back, J. H. Lee, S. H. Choi, Y. S. Jung and J. W. Choi, ACS Catal., 2019, 9,
7099-7108.
[14] X. T. Ling, F. Du, Y. T. Zhang, Y. Shen, T. Li, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat, Y. Zhou and Z. G. Zou,
RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 33558.
[15] M. M. Qian, S. S. Cui, D. C. Jiang, L. Zhang and P. W. Du, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1704075.
[16] X. B. Hua, Q. W. Zhou, P. F. Cheng, S. Q. Su, X. Wang, X. S. Gao, G. F. Zhou, Z. Zhang, J.
M. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 488, 326-334.
[17] N. L. Myadam, D. Y. Nadargi, J. D. G. Nadargi, F. I. Shaikh, S. S. Suryavanshi and M. G. Chaskar, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2020, 116, 107901.