+ All Categories
Home > Documents > P resentation of 2 Q 2003 F inancial and O perating R esults

P resentation of 2 Q 2003 F inancial and O perating R esults

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: lee-hicks
View: 16 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
VIMPELCOM. P resentation of 2 Q 2003 F inancial and O perating R esults. M erger P roposal for V impel C om and V impel C om- R egion. August 28, 2003. Disclaimer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
23
1 Presentation of 2Q2003 Financial and Operating Results VIMPELCOM August 28, 2003 Merger Proposal for VimpelCom and VimpelCom- Region
Transcript
Page 1: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

1

Presentation of 2Q2003 Financial and Operating Results

VIMPELCOM

August 28, 2003

Merger Proposal for VimpelCom and VimpelCom-Region

Page 2: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

2

Disclaimer

This presentation contains "forward-looking statements", as the phrase is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements relate, in part, to the Company’s development plans, such as future subscriber growth, national expansion and wireless penetration. These statements also relate to the consummation of the merger and related transactions which are subject to shareholder, regulatory and certain other approvals, as well as certain other conditions precedent, including the transfer of all of VimpelCom-Region’s licenses and permissions to VimpelCom. If any of the approvals are not obtained or any condition precedent is not met, the merger will not be consummated. The forward-looking statements are based on management's best assessment of the Company's strategic and financial position, future market conditions and trends its ability to consummate the merger and related transactions. These discussions involve risks and uncertainties. The actual outcome may differ materially from these statements as a result of unforeseen developments from regulatory authorities, competition, governmental regulations of the wireless telecommunications industry, general political and social uncertainties in Russia, general economic developments in Russia, the Company’s ability to continue to grow its overall subscriber base, continued volatility in the world economy and other factors. There can be no assurance that such risks and uncertainties will not have material adverse effects on the Company’s development plans or that the merger will be consummated. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statements include the risks described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 and other public filings made by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, which risk factors are incorporated herein by reference. VimpelCom disclaims any obligation to update developments of these risk factors or to announce publicly any revision to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation, or to make corrections to reflect future events or developments.

Page 3: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

3

Participants

Jo Lunder Chief Executive Officer

Nikolai N. PryanishnikovFirst Vice President – Commercial Director

Page 4: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

4

Participants

Elena A. ShmatovaChief Financial Officer

Valery P. GoldinVice President, International and Investor Relations

Page 5: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

5

VimpelCom 2Q2003 Financial and Operating Results

Page 6: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

6

2Q2003 Highlights

$53 million consolidated net income and $9.0 million net income in the regions

46% consolidated EBITDA margin and 36% EBITDA margin in the regions

8.5 million subscribers as of August 28, 2003

$97 million ruble bonds placed by VimpelCom-Region

Launch of operations in St. Petersburg

Number one position achieved in Siberia

One of the world’s first on-line prepaid roaming launched nationwide

Page 7: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

7

VimpelCom 2Q2003 financial highlights

Source: VimpelCom

Net revenues, $ million Net income, $ million

EBITDA, $ million EBITDA margin

173.4304.4

2Q2002 2Q2003

75.6%

52.621.9

2Q2002 2Q2003

139.9%

71.8139.9

2Q2002 2Q2003

95.0%

41.4%46.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2Q2002 2Q2003

Page 8: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

8

Key financial figures

($ million) 2Q03 2Q02 YoY 1Q03 QoQ

Net revenues 304.4 173.4 75.6% 244.4 24.5%

Moscow* 216.7 163.7 32.4% 179.4 20.8%Regions* 87.7 12.4 607.4% 65.1 34.8%

Gross margin 81.8% 80.2% -- 80.4% --

EBITDA 139.9 71.8 95.0% 107.9 29.6%EBITDA margin 46.0% 41.4% -- 44.2% --

Net income 52.6 21.9 139.9% 41.4 27.2%Net income margin 17.3% 12.7% -- 16.9% --

Moscow 47.1 27.3 72.5% 39.9 18.1%Regions 9.0 (6.4) 242.0% 0.04 24,365%

SG&A 106.7 63.8 67.3% 85.3 25.1%% 35.1% 36.8% -- 34.9% --

Bad debt 2.4 3.5 -31.4% 3.3 -27.3%% 0.8% 2.0% -- 1.4% --

Capex 174.2 109.6 58.9% 136.9 27.2%

* Total operating revenues excluding inter-company transactions

Page 9: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

9

Market performance

Source: VimpelCom, Consensus estimates

VimpelCom market share VimpelCom subscriber base

30%

24% 24%25% 26% 26% 27%

28% 29%

49%

52%53%52%52%

47%

39%40%

50%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2Q01 3Q01 4Q01 1Q02 2Q02 3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03

Russia MoscowRussiaMoscow

3.31 3.71 3.95 4.43 4.84

3.70

1.44

0.72

2.24

3.00

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03 28.08.03

Moscow Regions

4.03

5.15

6.19

7.43

8.54

million

Page 10: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

10

Key subscriber statistics

('000) 30 Jun 03 30 Jun 02 YoY 31 Mar 03 QoQ

Moscow 4,429 2,845 56% 3,946 12%Contract 763 702 9% 732 4%Prepaid 3,666 2,144 71% 3,214 14%% of GSM 97% 93% - 96% -

Regions 3,005 431 597% 2,242 34%

Total 7,434 3,276 127% 6,188 20%Contract 1,415 864 64% 1,360 4%Prepaid 6,018 2,412 150% 4,828 25%% of GSM 96% 89% - 95% -

Churn (quarterly) 10.5% 6.9% - 9.6% -

Page 11: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

11

National GSM network rollout

SouthPopulation: 22.9 mln.

MoscowPopulation:17.0 mln.

VolgaPopulation: 25.2 mln.

CentralPopulation:21.0 mln.

SiberiaPopulation: 15.3 mln.

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

910

11

12

1314

15

1617

20 1918

2223

2426

25

21

NorthwestPopulation: 14.0 mln.

2728

29 30

31

32

- other licensed regions

- in commercial operation - launch in 2003E

33

34

35

36

39

37

UralsPopulation:18.3 mln.38

40

4142

43

AreaSuper Region

Area popul. ('000)

Network Launch /

Acquisition1 Moscow Central 16,985 Jul 19992 Voronezh Central 2,379 May 20003 Tver Central 1,473 Sep 20014 Kaluga Central 1,041 Sep 20015 Vladimir Central 1,525 Sep 20016 Ryazan Central 1,228 Sep 20017 Lipetsk Central 1,213 Oct 20018 Tula Central 1,676 Oct 20019 Yaroslavl Central 1,368 Oct 2001

10 Smolensk Central 1,050 Nov 200111 Belgorod Central 1,512 Nov 200112 N. Novgorod Volga 3,524 Jan 200213 Saratov Volga 2,669 Jan 200214 Rostov South 4,407 Jan 200215 Barnaul Siberia 2,607 Jan 200216 Kemerovo Siberia 2,900 Jan 200217 Novosibirsk Siberia 2,692 Jan 200218 Bryansk Central 1,379 May 200219 Kostroma Central 737 May 200220 Ivanovo Central 1,149 Jun 200221 Orenburg Volga 2,177 Jul 200222 Kursk Central 1,236 Aug 200223 Orel Central 861 Aug 200224 Omsk Siberia 2,079 Aug 200225 Kazan Volga 3,780 Aug 200226 Tomsk Siberia 1,046 Sep 200227 Krasnodar South Sep 200228 Maykop South Sep 200229 Volgograd South 2,702 Oct 200230 Ufa Volga 4,103 Oct 200231 Cheboksary Volga 1,314 Oct 200232 Nalchick South 900 Oct 200233 Gorno-Altaysk Siberia 203 Oct 200234 Krasnoyarsk Siberia 2,966 Oct 200235 Samara Volga 3,240 Nov 200236 Astrakhan South 1,007 Nov 200237 Ulyanovsk Volga 1,382 Dec 200238 Kaliningrad North W 955 Dec 200239 Norilsk Siberia 135 Dec 200240 Makhachkala South 2,584 Jan 200341 Stavropol South 2,730 Feb 200342 Cherkessk South 440 Feb 200343 St. Petersburg North W 6,340 April 200344 Tura Siberia 18 Aug 2003

Total 101,265

5,571

- unlicensed territories

44

Page 12: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

12

Central Volga

Source: VimpelCom

317

523

706

903

1,096

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03 28.08.03

246

416

952775

579

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03 28.08.03

‘000‘000

Regions – number of subscribers

Page 13: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

13

Regions – number of subscribers (continued)

Source: VimpelCom

South‘000Siberia

Northwest

662

545

416

10616

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03 28.08.03

110 119

0

50

100

150

200

4Q02 1Q03 2Q03

142

735

594

422

285

0100200300400

500600700800900

3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03 28.08.03

110 119

188

249

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

4Q02 1Q03 2Q03 28.08.03

‘000

‘000

Page 14: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

14

Operational indicators

2Q03 2Q02 YoY 1Q03 QoQ

ARPU, blended ($) 14.3 18.9 -24.3% 13.5 5.8%

ARPU Moscow 16.9 19.6 -13.8% 15.2 11.0%

Contract (Moscow) 51.0 47.0 8.5% 45.6 11.6%

Prepaid (Moscow) 9.5 9.9 -4.8% 8.1 17.0%

ARPU regions 11.2 12.9 -13.2% 10.8 3.3%

MOU, blended (min) 93.8 94.7 -1.0% 81.5 15.1%

MOU Moscow 95.1 96.5 -1.4% 78.9 20.6%

Contract (Moscow) 273.7 215.2 27.2% 237.2 15.4%

Prepaid (Moscow) 56.0 54.4 3.0% 41.7 34.5%

MOU regions 91.6 77.4 18.4% 86.9 5.4%

SAC, blended ($) 21.1 31.3 -32.6% 20.8 1.2%

Moscow 29.7 35.1 -15.5% 29.9 -0.8%

Regions 12.3 14.8 -17.0% 11.7 4.6%

Page 15: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

15

2Q2003 2Q2002 2Q2003 2Q2002

№ of BTSs 2,388 1,670 2,794 517

№ of BSCs 108 49 74 19

№ of MSCs 10 7 38 13

Moscow Regions

Network rollout as of June 30, 2003

Note:BTS – base transceiver stationBSC – base station controllerMSC – mobile switching center Source: VimpelCom

Page 16: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

16

Merger Proposal for VimpelCom and VimpelCom-Region

Page 17: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

17

Strong performance in the regions

Six super-regional licenses

– 117 million pops

150% revenue growth in first half 2003

Positive contribution to EBITDA since 3Q02 and to net income since 1Q03

No. 1 in Siberia super-region

No. 2 and fastest growing in Central and Volga (incl. Orenburg) super-regions

Solid growth in South and promising start in Northwest

Urals to be launched in 4Q2003

Regional and Moscow operations now equally important parts of our business

VimpelCom market share, %

VimpelCom regional subscribers, 000s

Source: VimpelCom

57 100 123 200 285 431723

1,440

2,242

3,005

1Q01

2Q01

3Q01

4Q01

1Q02

2Q02

3Q02

4Q02

1Q03

2Q03

3,695

28.0

8.03

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1Q01 2Q01 3Q01 4Q01 1Q02 2Q02 3Q02 4Q02 1Q03 2Q03

Moscow Regions Russia

Page 18: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

18

Why accelerate the merger

VIP-R Shareholders Agreements give all parties the right to accelerate the merger process prior to December 2007

VimpelCom’s management sees significant benefits in merging now

– attractive terms achievable

– capturing 100% growth in the regions instead of only 55%

– unlocking synergies and achieving greater efficiencies

– lower cost of financing

– simplified corporate structure

Risk profile of the regions has changed - the VIP-R structure has now served its purpose

Page 19: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

19

The proposed transaction

In connection with the merger of VimpelCom and VIP-R, Alfa and Telenor will exchange their aggregate 44.7% interest in VIP-R for 10.9 million new VimpelCom common shares (equal to 14.6 million ADSs)

– VimpelCom the surviving entity

– 21.4% economic ownership dilution at closing (on a fully diluted basis)

Fairness opinion received from UBS Limited

Transaction expected to close during second quarter of 2004

– EGM called for 24 October 2003 (on certain issues, only disinterested shareholders may vote)

– 50% of disinterested shareholders are required to approve the transaction

The new VimpelCom ownership structure

Current Post - merger

Economic Voting Economic Voting

Telenor 29.0 25.0+ 29.9 26.6

Alfa Group 13.0 25.0+ 24.5 32.9

Free float / others 58.0 50.0 45.6 40.5

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

%

Current Post - merger

Economic Voting Economic Voting

Telenor 29.0 25.0+ 29.9 26.6

Alfa Group 13.0 25.0+ 24.5 32.9

Free float / others 58.0 50.0- 45.6 40.5

Total 100.0 100.0

%

Page 20: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

20

Relative valuation

Valuation ratio of 0.91 : 1 between VIP-R and the rest of VimpelCom (predominantly Moscow)

– implying that 33.6% of VimpelCom’s market cap. is attributable to its 55.3% stake in VIP-R

Number of subscribers in the regions to exceed Moscow during 2004

Revenues in the regions to exceed Moscowduring 2005

EBITDA in the regions to equal Moscow during 2005

Merger expected to be EPS accretive in 2005

– assuming synergies from tax, interest expense, G&A

Source: VimpelCom

2003E 2004E 2005E

2003E 2004E 2005E

Net revenues

Subscribers

2003E 2004E 2005E

Moscow Regions

EBITDA

Page 21: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

21

73.5

55.9

14.0

71.4

44.4

6.0

28.2

12.0

0

15

30

45

60

75

Jan 01 July 03 Dec 05E

12.5

9.54.5

2.8

34.4

14.6

0

10

20

30

40

Jan 01 July 03 Dec 05E

Attractive growth opportunities in the regions

Population, million

Source: Goskomstat, S&P, AC&M Consulting, J’Son & Partners

Wireless penetration, %

6.317.0

121.9

Moscow license area

St. Petersburgand Leningrad region

Regions (excl. St. P.)

Mobile subscribers, millionGDP per capita (2002), $

1,770

5,850

1,770

Moscow St. Petersburgand Leningrad region

Regions(excl. St. P.)

Moscow

St. Petersburg

Regions

Regions

Moscow

St. Petersburg

Page 22: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

22

Capital expenditure, $ million

Our capital expenditure program

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2002 2003E 2004E 2005E

Moscow Regions

Strong funding position

– Strong cash flow generation

– Strong balance sheet

– Access to debt capital markets

Page 23: P resentation of 2 Q 2003  F inancial and  O perating  R esults

23

A strong balance sheet

VimpelCom’s balance sheet (as of June 30, 2003)

$000

Cash and cash equivalents

Total assets

Interest bearing debt

Total shareholders’ equity

Debt*** / total shareholders’ equity

Debt*** / total assets

Actual

188,490

1,977,365

755,897

760,000

99%

38%

246,990

2,613,647

755,897

1,491,269

51%

29%

* Pro forma for Alfa Group's $58.5 million VIP-R equity contribution and VimpelCom / VIP-R merger** Includes long-term inter-company loans due to VimpelCom of $94,363

VIP-R

28,640

753,687

340,610**

271,397

*** Interest bearing debt only

consolidated

Debt*** / EBITDA**** 1.74 1.74

Pro formaconsolidated*

**** EBITDA - Operating income before depreciation & amortization for the 12 months ended June 30, 2003


Recommended