+ All Categories
Home > Documents > P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Date post: 11-May-2015
Category:
Upload: gcard-conferences
View: 368 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Graham Thiele
Popular Tags:
20
rking with (inter)regional innovation platfo CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas Graham Thiele Program Director
Transcript
Page 1: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms:CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Graham Thiele Program Director

Page 2: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Overview

• RTB, structure and impact pathways• Three types of innovation platform• Action research on partnerships• Linkage mechanisms with systems’ CRPs and innovation

platforms

Page 3: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

A collaboration of:

+ a wide spectrum research-for-development

stakeholders & partners

Page 4: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Our crops

BananaPlantain

Cassava Potato Sweetpotato Yam Other R&T

Page 5: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

RTBs share• Genetic complexity (> grains)• Vegetative propagation, similar seed systems• Perishability, bulkiness and post harvest/value

chain options

• High potential: > yields & livelihood outcomes• Low profile: “women’s crops”

Page 6: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Program Structure

Thematic

Upstream R4D funded directly

Downstream R4D projects funded by specific donors

Linkages for outcomes?

Page 7: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Impact Pathways

Page 8: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Partnership action research

1. Potential innovation platforms and how do they work?• Value chain (Papa Andina)

• Varietal development (Red Latin Papa)

• Cropping systems (CIALCA)

2. Basic principles in building platforms?

3. How are scientists and others actually partnering?• Network mapping

4. What are the linkage mechanisms with RTB?

Page 9: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Collective Learning

BoliviaEcuador

Peru

Coordination: CIP-Papa Andina

Local Partners

Farmers Strategic Partners

Stakeholder Platforms

Strengthen capacity with strategic partners

Local Partners

Farmers Strategic

Partners

Local Partners

Farmers

Strategic Partners

Thiele, Graham (CRP-RTB)
Local innovation on papa, also innovation around methods.
Page 10: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Creative idea

Research

COMO

Innovation processin Peru triggered spillover in Ecuador and Bolivia

Page 11: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Red LatinPapa - 12 Member Countries

Page 12: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

ManagementCommittee

INIA Chile

DisseminationWorking Group

SeedsWorking Group

INIAUruguay

INIAEcuador

Neiker andCCBATSpain

INIAVenezuela

INTACosta Rica

INTAArgentina

Regulatory Framework

and Political Impact

Working Group

PROINPABolivia

CORPOICA and UNCColombia

Information and Learning

Working Group

GermplasmWorking Group

INIA PeruRed Latin Papa

Provides potato germplasm

Feedback loop to management committee on participatory varietal trials

Adjusts breeding strategy Improve germplasm provided

Thiele, Graham (CRP-RTB)
Change colours
Page 13: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Mother & Baby trial design

Participatory Breeding / Varietal Selection (PVS) to

involve stakeholder in selection & dissemination

1. Flowering Stage

2. Harvest Stage 3. Organoleptic ev.

4. Post-harvest ev.

•••••

• = consortiums

Page 14: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

CIALCA

Enhance productivity banana and legume cropping systems

Country level organization: Rwanda, Burundi and DRC

Knowledge resource centers: out-scaling to escape country silos

Page 15: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

CIALCA

Knowledge resource center

Contextual validation and adaptation of knowledge products

eg control of banana bunchy top disease

Page 16: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Other colors= other orgs Node size set by degree centrality

  CG-CG, CG-ARI

Partnership action research (ILAC)

RTB actor network maps

Node colours by type of organization

Thiele, Graham (CRP-RTB)
Partners not being shared. Reearch capacity building and advocacy
Page 17: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

RTB actor network maps

New collaboration

Page 18: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

CRP Humidtropics

Action areas

Large overlap with RTB “hotspots”

Incorporates CIALCA

Page 19: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Challenges to partnering for outcomes

1. RTB predominance linkages among CG and ARIs

2. Limited engagement of non-HQ scientists and downtream R4D partners

3. Limited coordination across CRPs

4. CRPs are reconfiguring innovation platforms – how?

5. Compatibility “honest broker role” and accountability for outcomes?

Page 20: P3.1. Working with (inter)regional innovation platforms: CRP on Roots, Tubers and Bananas

Linkage mechanisms: CRPs and innovation platforms

1. Joint priority setting with stakeholders

2. Joint construction of impact pathways with stakeholders

3. Shared research sites and R4D activity

4. Learning alliances across regional innovation platforms

5. Shared action research on partnerships to “get it right”, in context of increased organizational complexity

6. Monitoring evolution partnerships


Recommended