+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Packaging trends for advanced Cmos technology...

Packaging trends for advanced Cmos technology...

Date post: 12-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: dinhthuan
View: 222 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
65
Packaging trends for advanced Cmos technology nodes Michel Garnier Packaging & Test Manufacturing Corporate Packaging & Automation STMicroelectronics Advanced Packaging Session, Semicon Russia 6th June 2013
Transcript

Packaging trends for advanced Cmos

technology nodes

Michel Garnier

Packaging & Test Manufacturing

Corporate Packaging & Automation

STMicroelectronics

Advanced Packaging Session, Semicon Russia

6th June 2013

Content

• STMicroelectronics presentation • General presentation

• R&D Packaging @ STM

• Packaging Platforms covered at ST

• Packaging development for Advanced Cmos technologies • Business segments

• Main requests

• Cu pillar for FC packages

• Cu RDL for WLPs…

• Conclusions

2

• A global semiconductor leader

• The largest European semiconductor company

• 2012 revenues of $8.49B(1)

• Approx. 48,000 employees worldwide(1)

• Approx. 11,500(1) people working in R&D

• 12 manufacturing sites

• Listed on New York Stock Exchange, Euronext Paris

and Borsa Italiana, Milano

Who we are 3

(1) Including ST-Ericsson, a 50:50 joint venture with Ericsson

Product Segments 4

Digital

Convergence

Group

(DCG)

Imaging,

BiCMOS ASIC

& Silicon

Photonics

(IBP)

Automotive

Product

Group

(APG)

Analog, MEMS

& Sensors

(AMS)

Microcontroller,

Memory & Secure

MCU

(MMS)

Embedded Processing Solutions

(EPS)

Industrial &

Power Discrete

(IPD)

Sense & Power and Automotive Products

(SPA)

Wireless

(WPS)

*Exit to be completed by 3Q 2013

ST-Ericsson*

50:50 JV with Ericsson

Where you find us 5

Our automotive products

are making driving safer,

greener and more

entertaining

Our smart power products

are making more of our energy resources

Our MEMS & Sensors

are augmenting

the consumer experience

Our Microcontrollers

are everywhere

making everything smarter

and more secure

Our digital consumer products

are powering the augmented

digital lifestyle

Bouskoura - Morocco

Calamba – Philippines Longgang - China Shenzhen - China

Kirkop - Malta

Muar - Malaysia

Central PTM

Singapore

Toa Payoh

Toa Payoh - Singapore

Corporate Packaging

& Automation

France / Italy / Malta /

Singapore / Philippines / China

Packaging – Production & R&D

• Approximately 15’000 employees located in

• 6 manufacturing locations

• 6 R&D centers ( CPA )

• Over 400 different packages

7

BGA (Ball Grid Array) Platform Development

& Advanced Packaging R&D – CPA Grenoble, France

• Assembly Process R&D

• Low k/ Ultra Low k Packaging solutions

• Package Design & BGA Substrate Technology

• New Product / Packaging Project Management

• Package Electrical Modeling & Measurement

• Assembly Design Rules Management

• 3D Advanced Packaging

• Wafer Level Solutions

Copper wire dev.

For low k wafers

3D TSV assembly

(ST & Leti)

Flip-Chip dev.

For low k wafers

Ceramic, BGA (Ball Grid Array)

& Advanced Packaging Prototyping – CPA Grenoble, France

• Best in class cycle time with

Fab/EWS/Package test proximity

• 1000m² clean room facilities

• Thin wafers @ 50um

• Wire Bonding @ 36um pitch

• Fine Pitch Flip-Chip assembly @ 80um

• 0.3mm BGA ball pitch

Laminate

& ceramic packages

12 inches wafer

size capability

SIP capability

including

01005 SMD & FC

3D TSV assembly

Now open for external customers

FEBE compatibility

BGA/ 2D & 3D Packaging Ecosystem 9

6/6/2013

Presentation Title

Front-End

R&D

Packaging

R&D

Group

Engineering

Internal

BGA

Manufacturing

OSATs

BGA

Manufacturing

Package Dev/

customized solution

Flexibility First

protos

Grenoble – Crolles cluster

Content

• STMicroelectronics presentation • General presentation

• R&D Packaging @ STM

• Packaging Platforms covered at ST

• Packaging development for Advanced Cmos technologies • Business segments

• Main requests

• Cu pillar for FC packages

• Cu RDL for WLPs…

• Conclusions

10

Technology Competitive Advantage

Beyond CMOS:

Quantum Computing,

Molecular Electronics,

Spintronics

« More than Moore »: Diversification

« M

oo

re’s

La

w »

: M

inia

turiza

tio

n

Analog / RF Passives HV Power Sensors,

Actuators Biochips

130nm

90nm

65nm

45nm

32nm

22nm

Ba

se

line

CM

OS

: C

PU

, M

em

ory

, Logic

SoC

SiP

VLSI PLATFORM

• Information processing

• Digital Content

• System-on-chip

• Interacting with people

& environment

• Non-digital content

• System-in-package

11

•Packaging is key enabler for both More Moore & More than Moore

•Packaging is a differentiation factor for new products

Packaging Technology R&D 12

Sense MEMS and microphones (LGAs), Optical modules and Imagers towards BSI

Power & BCD High dissipation, miniaturized packages (PSSO, QFNs)

Digital with advanced CMOS Integration and miniaturization based on BGAs. Towards Flip Chip &WLP

13

Packaging technology roadmap

LEAD FRAME based package

DRIVING FORCES:

Size, Integration, Pin Count, Power, Cost

Hi-QUAD

High power

System in Package (SIP)

Up to 100 pins

Medium power, Cost effective

> 100 pins

PowerSO,PSSO

TQFPs-EP

Medium power, Small size,(SiP)

> 100 pins QFN

QFP

Tapeless QFN-mr

Package footprint reduction (example)

eTQFP 20x20 144 I/O

QFN-mr 9x9 124 I/O with power bars

180 connections

Package

footprint

0.5

1

0.25

eTQ 20X20

eTQFP20X20

QFN-mr 9X9

- 47%

- 68%

Ep-TQFP 14X14 128 I/O

with

Power bars & ground ring

180 connections

Power Bar

Ground Ring

14

ClipPAK

SO-8 CLIP

Power Discrete Packaging Roadmap (Evolution vs. PFLAT, DSC, Hi Temp, Advanced D.A & Interconnection)

SO-8 RIBBON

DPak H.C. 2,3 L

H2Pak H.C. 2,3,6,7 L

PolarPAK

PowerFLAT8x8 HV

PFLAT Dual Side Cooling

PowerFLAT 5x6 Ribbon

& Clip with 1,2 Islands

PFLAT

3.3x3.3

PFLAT 5x5 & 5x6 HV

Bond / Mold Less

TO247 LGG

Automotive

OctaPack

Chip on Chip

I2packFP

Hi Temp

(SiC)

PFLAT 2x2

PSO-10 RIBBON

PSO-36

TO220/D2PAK

Cold by pass Advanced Die Attach

Thin wafers new process

PFLAT AUTO

Wettable Flanks

Advanced Interconnections

(GaN compatible)

16

06/06/2013 Presentation Title

Content

• STMicroelectronics presentation • General presentation

• R&D Packaging @ STM

• Packaging Platforms covered at ST

• Packaging development for Advanced Cmos technologies • Business segments

• Main requests

• Cu pillar for FC packages

• Cu RDL for WLPs…

• Conclusions

17

Packaging Technology R&D 18

Sense MEMS and microphones (LGAs), Optical modules and Imagers towards BSI

Power & BCD High dissipation, miniaturized packages (PSSO, QFNs)

Digital with advanced CMOS Integration and miniaturization based on BGAs. Towards Flip Chip &WLP

Business segments (1/2) 19

Source: Prismark

• Consumer/ Portables:

• Mobiles/ smartphones

• Tablets

• Laptops, computers

• Portable gaming

• TV, Set Top boxes, displays, smart home

Business segments (2/2)

• Networking

• Imaging

• Imaging Signal Processor

(smartphones, gaming)

• Microcontrollers

• General Purpose MCUs

• Secured MCUs

• Automotive

• Safety

• Infotainment

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Kc210.088bp package value

IC PACKAGE VALUE TRENDP

erc

en

t o

f IC

Packag

e V

alu

e A

dd

Wire Bond (Leadframe/Module)

Wire Bond (BGA/CSP)

Flip Chip DCA

Flip Chip Package

3D TSV

$6Bn 10% CAAGR 6% CAAGR$25Bn $59Bn

Source: Prismark

21

Packaging Growth Trends in Value

BGA package types @ STMicrolectronics (*)

Configuration Package type Description Pictures

Single BGA PBGA 27² & 35² WB, molded

FBGA 14² to 40² FC, not molded

Matrix BGA

xFBGA 2² to 23² WB, molded

xFBGA 2² to 23² FC, molded

xFBGA 2² to 23² SIP, FC, WB,

SMD,molded

POP 12² & 14² WB, molded

POP 12² & 14² FC, not molded or

molded

22

PBGA

FCBGA

(*): protos: all available in Grenoble pilot line, production: internal or external

Packaging Roadmap – Digital products

SIP

Emerging

technologies

STACK BGA

BGA Std

FLIP CHIP

WLCSP

FC CuP

Solder Flip Chip BGA

Fan In WLP Cu Pillar Flip Chip BGA Fan Out WLP

Wire Bonding BGA

3D Advanced Packaging

Fan Out WLP

PBGA

FCBGA FCBGA

From Wirebond to Flip Chip (Solder and Cu Pillar) and to 3D packaging

Up to 2011 2012 - 2014 2015- 2016

Copper Pillars

PoP

PoP

PoP 3D,TSV, Si interposer

BGA - Thickness challenge 24

06/06/2013 Presentation Title

VFBGA

1.0mm

UFBGA

0.65mm

WFBGA

0.8mm

TFBGA

1.2mm

Available for production (*)

(*): internal or external

• Needs for density, miniaturization, Integration

• Power management

• Cost

25 Packaging challenges

Packaging road map – Digital Cmos

Cmos040

Cmos032

Cmos028

Cmos020

Cmos014

Cmos040

Cmos032

Cmos028

Cmos020

Cmos014

Cmos040 – Fan-In

Cmos040 & above – Fan-Out

Cmos 028 – Fan-Out

Cmos020 – Fan-Out

Cmos014 – Fan-Out

Co

pp

er

Wir

e

bo

nd

F

lip

-Ch

ip

So

lde

r

Bu

mp

Flip

-Ch

ip

Co

pp

er

Pilla

r

Wa

fer

Le

ve

l

Fa

n-I

n

Fa

n-O

ut

3D,TSV, Si interposer

3D structure extraction

Packaging design & Simulation

V001 V003

V004

F003C001

2 4

1 38 10 6 12 14

9 11 7 13 15

5

5

V002

F001

F002 F004

C002

L001

L002

L003

L004

R001 R003

R002 R004

C001_002

barre1_I_barre1

barre2_I_barre2

barre1_Sink

barre2_Sink

Electrical

Convection & Radiation

Convection & Radiation

Conduction

Thermal

Flip - chip

underfill

Flip

Flip - chip

Underfill Crack

Die Crack

Flip Chip

Underfill

Delam

Mold

compound

Solder

resist

Thermal

via

Cu

plane

Die

flag Die

Substrate

Mechanical

27

• Materials in packaging play key roles in

• Performance • Power consumption and dissipation • Price

• 2 major materials in any packages: • Carriers: Leadframes / Substrates • Interconnects: wires, bumps, RDL

• The right choice of materials for an optimized 3Ps

• Interactions with die and carriers

28 Packaging Materials

Packages

Interconnections

Carriers

29 Packaging Materials Packages

Interconnection – today in production

• Wire bonding process is still the predominant

• Why?

• Mature infrastructure

• Conservative business segments – long product life time

• Mature design tools

• Huge technical improvements during last 20 years

Despite its weak overall performance vs flip-chip

• UPH

• Electrical performances

30

90’s 10’s

Bonding speed (w/s) 4-5 Up to 20

# I/O per device <200 1000

Min Au wire diameter 32um 15um

Min bond pad pitch >200um 40um

Wire bonder price >120 k$ <70k$

The move to Cu wire in packaging 31

• STMicroelectronics’ drive into

Cu wire

• Contributing to

• Price

• Performance

• Power Consumption

• Reduced carbon impact vs gold

Leading in Copper 32

• Addressing the challenges of

various technologies

• In high volume production

2009 : Length of gold wire converted

to copper can circle the earth!

2012 : Length of gold wire

converted to copper can

reach the moon! Achieved!

Fusion Temperature 1084.62°C

Boiling Temperature 2562°C

Electrical Conductivity 59.6 106 S.m-1

Thermal Conductivity 401W.m-1.K-1

Thermal Capacity 380J.Kg-1.K-1

Advantages

1. Low cost

2. Good electrical property

3. Good thermal conductivity

4. Compatible with thermo-sonic bonding process

5. Low Inter Metallic growth

Drawbacks

1. Hardness

2. Sensitive to oxidation

3. Sensitive to corrosion

Cu for Wirebonding 33

Cu Wires types

Gold Pure copper CuPd

Au Bare Cu CuPd

Cost --- +++ +

Electrical conductivity + +++ ++

Thermal conductivity ++ +++ +++

Hardness - ++ +++

Oxidation --- +++ +

Workability +++ + +++

Reliability (Humid) +++ + +

Reliability (hot temperature) + +++ +++

BSOB bonding (die to die) +++ ++ ++

• 2 major kinds of copper wire

- Bare Cu (4N),

- Pd coated (4N-CuPd)

34

Cu Wires types

Bare Cu CuPd

Pitch>50µm, opening>50µm 0.8mils

Pitch =50µm, opening =44µm 0.7mils

Pitch <50µm, opening<44µm 0.6mils

Die to die bonding, pitch>50 x

Die to die bonding, pitch<50 x

Bare Cu wire: preferred in mass production for dedicated line

CuPd wire: used for aggressive pitch and high line conversions rate

35

Gold Pure copper CuPd

• 2 major kinds of copper wire

- Bare Cu (4N),

- Pd coated (4N-CuPd)

Cu Wire: Equipments & Toolings Wire bonding equipments

• Copper kit to create neutral environment to avoid ball oxidation.

• Forming gas ratio (95% N2 ), proper gas flow rate

needed for spherical ball shape

• Wire bonder selections depending on application complexity (BPP, BPO, looping)

Cu FAB formed in air

Cu FAB formed in N2H2

36

Wire bonding Capillaries

• Capillary life time to improve with harder ceramic

and special tip treatments

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Cumulated M units produced in Cu wire

Year

BGA

Hi-Quad

PDIP

Power Plastic

PowerSO

PowerSSO

QFN

QFP

SIL

SMD Flat Diodes

SO

TSSOP

Watts

By Package:

Billions of parts produced in Cu Wire

Wide variety of Packages & Applications 37

PowerSO

PowerSSO

SMD Flat Diodes

Hi-Quad

QFP

QFN

SO

PDIP

BGA

Power

Plastic

&

Watts

• Industrial

• Consumer

• Wireless

• Computers & Peripherals

• Automotive

Cumulated M Units

produced in Cu wire

TSSOP

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EndMay

M units produced in Cu wire / year

Year

BGA

Hi-Quad

PDIP

Power Plastic

PowerSO

PowerSSO

QFN

QFP

SIL

SMD Flat Diodes

SO

TSSOP

Watts

By Package:

38

Billions of parts produced in Cu Wire

Wide variety of Front End technologies

Cumulated M Units

produced in Cu wire

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Cumulated M units produced in Cu wire

Year

BCD

BIP

CMOS

Misc

P.MOSFET

VIPOWER

By Wafer Tech:

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Cumulated km ofpurchased Cu wires

Year

3

2.5

2

1.5

1.3

1.2

1

0.8

0.7

0.6

By Dia (mil)By Dia (mil)By Dia (mil)

39

Thousands of Kms of Cu Wire

Wide variety of Wire types

Cumulated km of

purchased Cu wires

2 – 2.5 – 3mils

< 1mil

0.6mil

Earth's Circumference :

40 000 km

Earth-Moon:

~400 000 km

40

Wireless interconnection trend

• is one of the more demanding business segment

in term of miniaturization, integration,

electrical performances & cost

More change in 2 years than during last 20 years

80%

15%

30%

5%

45%

25%

41

Ultra Low K Silicon Characterization : White Bumps

WB = White Bump = Ultra Low K Delamination (too high stress below bump)

Jerome Lopez- STM - Semi Europe 2011

The larger the die, the more CTE stress mismatch (die to substrate)

The more space available for pad pitch solder bumps rather than Pillars

42

Flip Chip Process: Mass Reflow (Capillary UnderFill)

vs TC-NCP (Thermo-Compression)

Thermo Compression Cu Pillar, Pitch ≥ 50µm (40um for 3D)

No reflow, vertical stress with Thermo-Compression bond force

NCPaste applied before die attach, absorbing part of stress.

Miniaturization

Reliability & Yield

Higher bump density &

finer bump pitch <80um

Substrate Cost & Layout

Assy Cost & UPH

Lower Sourcing flexibility

Mass Reflow Solder, Pitch ≥ 140µm

Low stress due to large UBM & soft solder bump material

Mature (process,materials)

Lower stress (soft bump,

larger UBM)

Sourcing flexibility

Substrate Cost (more

layers, SOP) & Layout

Large bump pitch

PROS CONS

Die area (mm2)

Cu pillars

Fine

Pitch

Solder Bumps

Large

Pitch

Cu pillars

Fine

Pitch

MR

MR

TC

Cu pillars

Large

Pitch

MR

Reflow generates stress for bumps during cooling :

Si & Substrate have ≠ CTE, stress on bumps without protection

Mature (process,materials)

Substrate & Assy Cost

Sourcing flexibility

Higher stress at

bump area

Sensitive to unsolder

Mass Reflow Cu Pillar, Pitch ≥ 80µm

Stress induced by Cu Pillar is reduced thanks to

usage of very large UBM size

Mass Reflow Cu Pillar, Pitch ≥ 125µm Mature (process,materials)

Limited stress (larger UBM)

Reduce O/S risk vs Solder

Current density per bump

Sourcing flexibility

Substrate Cost (same

as Solder Bump one)

Large bump pitch &

UBM size

Stress

Reduction

LA

RG

E P

ITC

H / B

UM

PS

F

INE

PIT

CH

/ B

UM

PS

Cu pillars

Fine

Pitch

Flip Chip process vs Die Size – Road Map

The larger the die, the more CTE stress mismatch (die to substrate)

The more space available for pad pitch solder bumps rather than Pillars

Solder Bumps

Large

Pitch

Cu pillars

Fine

Pitch

MR

MR

TC

43 To be avoided Under analysis Recommended

Current Full confidence border

Q4’13 Target confidence border

Cu pillars

Large

Pitch

MR

Cu

rre

nt

sta

tus

Targ

et

Q4 2

013

Die area (mm2)

Stress

Reduction

44

Al SiN

Si

Towards Cu Pillar Bumps for Flip Chip

130 µm

Solder bumps Cu Pillar Bumps

< 80 µm

45 Towards Cu Pillar Bumps for Flip Chip

Cu Pillar Bumps

< 80 µm

• Higher density of interconnections

allowed with finer pitch

• Good electrical properties

• Package performance increase

• High electro-migration performance

• Higher standoff for underfill process

• Higher thermal fatigue

• Lower substrate cost / solder mask

46 Towards Cu Pillar Bumps for Flip Chip

130 µm

Solder bumps Cu Pillar Bumps

< 80 µm

230µm Pitch

230µ

m P

itch

Solder Bump

SMD (SOP)

10

m P

itch

Min

.

140µm Pitch

Pillar Bump

NSMD (OSP)

47 Towards Cu Pillar Bumps for Flip Chip

130 µm

Solder bumps Cu Pillar Bumps

230µm Pitch

230µ

m P

itch

Solder Bump

SMD (SOP)

10

m P

itch

Min

.

140µm Pitch

Pillar Bump

NSMD (OSP)

• Substrate: 50% of package cost

• Allows peripheral bump pitch routing

• relaxed Line / Space + less layers

• Cheap finishing for CUF/MUF (OSP)

Cu Pillars packaging

Cu Pillar interconnections

on BGA substrates

48

FC CuP

Cu Pillar interconnections

on 3D / Die to Die

ST’s competitiveness moving to 3D

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

3D integration environment = ST strength

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

ST first step in 2.5D – TSV WL camera

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

3D main technical challenges • Front side processes

• TSV etching (depth & uniformity)

• TSV Cu filling

• Portable to advanced technology nodes (FDSOI)

• Back side processes

• Carrier temporary bonding & thin wafer de-bonding

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

3D main technical challenges

• 3D Package assembly

• Thin die sawing, pick & place, warpage, non solder

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

Analog/digital partitioning

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

Memory on Application Processor

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

Further development axes

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

3D @ ST – status & perpectives

Jean Michailos - STM - European 3D TSV Summit 2013

Wafer Level Packaging

58

Solder ball

Cu-RDL

Si Chip

EMC

UBM (Under Bump Metallurgy)

RDL (Al,Cu)

Si Chip

Solder ball

Fan In-WLP Fan Out-WLP (eWLB)

Courtesy of Infineon/ Stats-Chippac/ ST 2010

Fan-out WLP / 2-side

59

Pre-formed PCB Bar

Laser drill and pasted filling

180um

45

0u

m

ePOP Package ePOP X-section

8x8 Fan-out

12x12 Fan-out

60

Single Chip

F2F + SoW

F2F + FO-WLP

Multichip + SoW

Single Sided,

Single Chip

Double Sided,

Single or Multi-Chip F2F or Multichip SoW

Multichip

SiP on Wafer (SoW)

PoP

3D-eWLB / 3D-IC Package Roadmap

Courtesy of Infineon/ Stats-Chippac/ ST 2010

WLPs WB BGAs Sensors FC BGAs 3D IC

The Interconnections trends for new Packaging

Power Adv. QFNs

Sense & Power Digital

Cu Pillars

Cu wires

Inte

rconnections

Cu RDL

61

Content

• STMicroelectronics presentation • General presentation

• R&D Packaging @ STM

• Packaging Platforms covered at ST

• Packaging development for Advanced Cmos technologies • Business segments

• Main requests

• Cu pillar for FC packages

• Cu RDL for WLPs…

• Conclusions

62

• An overview of packaging trends was presented

• Packaging is a differentiation factor for new products

• Interconnection is evolving fast

• WB no more considered for advanced Cmos technologies

• Copper metal is predominant

• Main dev/ activities:

• FC Cu pillar

• 3D

• 3D & WL combination

• Team work & anticipation are fondamendal for success

• Co-design

• FEBEcomp activities

• Electrical, thermal & thermo-mechanical modelling

63 Conclusions

Packaging

64

by ST Thank You

65


Recommended