Date post: | 12-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | garey-wells |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Page 1
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Risk & Work Configuration Management as a Function of Integrated Safety Management
Lana Buehrer & Paul CakanicNational Security Technologies, LLC
November 2007
and Training Ranges
Test Nevada
Page 2
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
The Nevada Test Site (NTS)• Covers approximately 1,350 square miles; provides
experimental capabilities in support of the Stockpile Stewardship Program– Subcritical experiments to obtain technical information on US nuclear
weapons stockpile– Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER)– Atlas Pulsed Power machine testing– Big Explosives Experimental Facility (BEEF)– Device Assembly Facility (DAF)– Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) – under construction
• Work for Others– Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC)– WMD/First Responder Training– Radioactive Waste Management Sites– Environmental Restoration– Additional Department of Defense (DoD) support
Page 3
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
NTS (cont.)
• Extremely diverse missions conducted by multiple organizations– National Security Technologies (NSTec) is the primary M&O contractor– Three National Weapons Laboratories (NWLs) maintain a presence to
conduct experiments (LANL, LLNL, SNL)– Other NWLs also participate (e.g., BNL)– Department of Homeland Security and DoD missions– Non-defense research and development
• Unique challenges– Physical size (1,350 square miles)– Distance between Nevada facilities (NTS and NLV/LV)– Facilities in Nevada, California, New Mexico and Washington, D.C.– Maintain over 700 buildings plus associated utilities & roads– Multiple NWLs & Contractors– Diversity of missions
Page 4
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Step One:The Plan and the System
Lana Buehrer, PMPManager, Facility Services
National Security Technologies, LLC
Page 5
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Risk & Work Configuration Management
• Past
– Documented chain of responsibility did not exist prior to PLN -1014
– No written direction/Company Directives to cover:
• Acceptance of performance direction
• Acceptance of business risk
• Approval of physical risk
• Present
– Company directive for Risk and Work Configuration Management
– Software being used to ensure work authorization
– e-FOM provides replacement for Support, Facility, & part of Project
Execution Plans
• Future
– Establish Configuration Management for the Facility Manager Program
– Establish full integration with the sitewide Work Control Process
Page 6
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Risk & Work Configuration Management
Page 7
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Risk and Work Configuration Management Safety Chain
Work Approval Work Assignment
Work Authorization
Work Acceptance
NSTec President/Chief
Operating Officer
Senior Line Managers
Directors
Approve Work (Performance Direction)
from NSO. Accept business and identified physical risk from within their responsible orgs.
Division Managers
Line Managers
Department Managers
Identify physical and related business risk, then feed up to Senior Line Managers
Section Managers
Assign Work
Prepare Work Authorization
Approve Work Authorization
e-F
OM
Workers Implement
Authorized Work
e-FOM
Page 8
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Risk & Work Configuration Management
• PLAN-1014
– Establishes electronic ISM implementation process
– Establishes management structure for acceptance of business & physical
risks
– Establishes a risk-based graded approach for work authorization
– Implements ISM & Safety Chain Responsibilities for Work Authorization
– Establishes General Employee Safety (GES) concept
– Senior Managers/staff are default GES
• Does not require further controls or authorization
• Hazards at transient locations are controlled by host operations and Facility
Managers.
– Creates electronically applicable DOE/NNSA-required permits
Page 9
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
• NSTec Written Authorization Basis
– Identify work scope
– Identify hazards
– Establish standards &
requirements for performing
work
– Feedback & improvement
mechanisms
• NNSA/NSO Real Estate Permit (REOP): – Work scope is well-defined
within geographical boundaries
– Identify hazards
– Implement controls to
mitigate hazards
– Authorized work
– Managed effectively
Integrated Safety Management (ISM)Implementation
Page 10
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Department/Section
Work Scope (by location)Risks/Hazards (by location)Controls
GESS or GESS+ option
e-FOM e-REOP
Identify Real Property
Safety Envelope & GPS Coordinates
Identify Non-tenant SOW/risks
Facility Haz Cat & Facility Risks
Establish POD or Equivalent/OCC
Approve Tenant SOWs
Safety Envelope
Authorized SOW
Location & Real Property Usage
Risks & Controls
filtered for RMC only
electronic - Facility and OperationsManagement information System (e-FOM)
Online Approvals & Notifications
(Data Only Entered Once)
ALL DATA SEARCHABLE & SORTABLE
DATA Repository
REOP Manager Approval
Division Manager Performance Direction
Unique FacilityCharacteristicsQuestionnaire
Safety Chain
No Data Entry - Auto-Generated
Division Level Approval
SME Concurrence
SME Concurrence NSO SME Concurrence
Page 11
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
e-FOM Software Application
• Created as a Company Information Officer Business System• Eighteen Basic Questions to Cover:
– Work Scope – Conduct of Operations– Hazard Analysis– Security Activity Analysis– National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)– NNSA/NSO REOP Risk Management Checklist– Identified Implemented Controls– Facility Characteristics– Facility Hazard Category
• Real Estate Permitting Process• Data Mining of Facility and Authorization Basis
Page 12
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Facility Managers’ Main Menu (e-FOM)
Page 13
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Conduct of Operations Survey
Page 14
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Security Activity Analysis
Page 15
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Integrated Risk Management Analysis (IRMA)
Page 16
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Expanded IRMA
Page 17
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Integrated Facility Characteristics Analysis (IFCA)
Page 18
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Facility Data Warehouse
Page 19
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Step Two:The Work Control Process
Paul CakanicDefense Facilities and Nuclear Operations
National Security Technologies, LLC
Page 20
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Identify Work[ISM Core 1]
Request Work Accept WorkPlan Work
[ISM Core 2&3]Schedule Work
Execute Work[ISM Core 4]
Close Out WorkFeedback & Improvement[ISM Core 5]
Eight ISM Guiding Principles
1. Line Management Responsibility for Safety2. Clear Roles & Responsibilities3. Competence Commensurate with Responsibilities4. Balance Priorities5. Identification of Safety Standards and Requirements6. Hazard Controls Tailored to Work Being Performed7. Operations Authorization8. Worker Involvement
Five Core ISM Functions
1. Define the Scope of Work2. Analyze the Hazards3. Develop and Implement Hazard Controls4. Perform Work Within Controls5. Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement
GP 1
GP 2
GP 1
GP 2
GP 3
GP 4
GP 8
GP 7
GP 1
GP 2
GP 3
GP 4
GP 5
GP 6
GP 8
GP 1
GP 2
GP 3
GP 5
GP 6
GP 8
GP 1
GP 2
GP 3
GP 4
GP 7
GP 1
GP 2
GP 3
GP 8
GP 1
GP 2
GP 3
GP 5
GP 6
GP 8GP 8
Implementation of ISM into the NSTec Activity Level Integrated Work Control Process
8th Guiding Principle anticipated
C1 – C5
P1 – P8
Page 21
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Authorization Process[e-FOM]
Performing NSTec or
NSTec Managed AL
Work?
Exception or Exemption?
N
Y
EXIT Process
Y
N
Emergency Work?
Y
N
Chapter 10Subcontracted AL
Work
Subcontracted AL Work?
Y
N
Chapter 2Identify AL Work
Chapter 3Request AL Work
Chapter 4Accept AL Work
Chapter 5Plan AL Work
Chapter 6Schedule AL Work
Chapter 7Execute AL Work
Chapter 8Close Out AL
Work
Chapter 9Feedback & Improvement
Has AL Work
Been Identified & Scoped?
N
Has AL Work Been Requested?
Has AL Work
Been Accepted?
Y
N
Y
Has AL Work
Been Planned?
N
Y
N
Y
END Process
C1; P8
P1, P2
P1-4,7
C2,3; P1-6,8
P1-4,7,8
C4; P1-3,5,6,8
P1-3,8
C5; P1-3,5,6,8
LegendAL = Activity LevelC = CORE ISM Functione-FOM = electronic Facility & Operations Management Information SystemP = ISM Guiding Principle
Control of Activity Level Work
Control of Facility Safety Envelope
C1-5; P1-8
Operational Emergency?
Y
N
Emergency Response
Procedures
Roadmap for Roadmap for ISM ISM
ImplementationImplementation
Process Driver: NNSA Process Driver: NNSA Activity Level Work Activity Level Work
Planning and Control Planning and Control Processes Processes
(January 2006) (January 2006)
Page 22
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Planning Activity Level Work
• Job Hazard Assessment required– Field walk-down to identify hazard information BEFORE planning of work
• Work Planners, Workers, Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)• Focus is on the ENTIRE SCOPE OF WORK and co-located work
– One Form/Process for ALL activity level work – data feeds into Binning
• Activity Screening/Binning Process– Scope of Work ComplexityScope of Work Complexity – How “easy” or how “difficult” the ENTIRE
scope of work is to accomplish. Consists of many tasks.
– Consequence of Improper PerformanceConsequence of Improper Performance – The undesired consequences of things that can happen if work is improperly performed
• Health and safety, equipment damage, environmental impact, legal ramifications, mission impacts, financials
– Frequency of PerformanceFrequency of Performance – Deals with how often the work is performed. Not how often a worker performs the work.
– Human judgment and experience must always be applied during this process
CORE ISM Function 2-3, Guiding Principles 1-6, 8CORE ISM Function 2-3, Guiding Principles 1-6, 8
Page 23
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
How COMPLEX is the Scope of Work to be performed? (i.e., this includes Work location factors such as types of Rad
Areas, confined spaces, etc.)
What are the CONSEQUENCES of improper performance for this scope of work? (i.e., what specific undesired things can happen)
At what FREQUENCY is this Scope of Work performed?
(Not how often any one individual performs the scope of work – that
is “proficiency”)
1 Very Easy - Very easy to perform: mental activity required is low, degree of work complexity is low.
1
Negligible – Consequences of improper performance are negligible - Improper performance would make no difference to the health and safety of the worker or to the operation of a system or process.
1 Rarely – Less than once per year.
2
Somewhat Easy - Somewhat easy to perform: mental activity required is low, degree of work complexity is medium.
2
Undesirable – Consequences of improper performance are undesirable – Improper performance may cause minor health and safety impacts, or impair the reliability of a system or a process.
2 Seldom – Once every 5 to 12 months.
3
Moderately Difficult - Moderately difficult to perform: mental activity required is medium, degree of work complexity is medium.
3
Serious – Consequences of improper performance are serious - Improper performance may cause serious health and safety impacts, or cause serious damage to the system or process.
3 Occasionally - Once every 3 weeks to 4 months.
4
Very Difficult - Very difficult to perform: mental activity required is medium, degree of work complexity is high.
4
Severe –Consequences of improper performance are severe - Improper performance may result in severe impact to worker health and safety, or cause severe damage to a system or process..
4 Often - Once every 1 to 2 weeks.
5
Extremely Difficult - Extremely difficult to perform: mental activity required is high, degree of work complexity is high.
5 Extremely Severe – Consequences of improper performance are extremely severe - a serious injury or site emergency may result.
5 Very Often – More frequently than once per week.
Activity Screening/Binning Guidance
Page 24
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Examples of Scope of work COMPLEXITY
1 Very Easy
Electrical Work – 1) Removal of a panel or equipment cover for purposes of observation Environmental – Tasks which require no controls Laser Work - Operation of Class I or Class II lasers Industrial Hygiene - Changing sensors in multi-gas instruments; Radiological - No radiological hazards involved
2 Somewhat Easy
Electrical Work - 1) Electrical work with < 50 Volts (arc flash Cat -1 to Cat 1) Environmental - Work requiring a NEPA review; Generation of solid sanitary waste; Management of used oil, lead acid batteries, universal waste; Land clearing; Surface disturbance. General Work – Manual Lifting (Up to50 pounds); General Sampling by SME Hazardous Material Work - Work with non-ionizing radiation Laser Work - Operation of Class IIIA Industrial Hygiene - Non-permit required confined space entries; Taking asbestos samples by coring tool Radiological - Working with HAZ 1 & 2 sources or radioactive material. Underground Work - Underground or mining operations
3 Moderate Difficulty
Electrical – Working with ≥ 50 Volts; Task performed under Single-Point, Single-Source LOTO; Environmental – Work involving a RCRA storage area; Work affecting potential Air Quality Standards. Potential for spill of hazardous chemicals; Changes to waste water system (sewage lagoons or septic tanks); Generation of hazardous, radioactive, mixed, PCB >50ppm, or asbestos waste; Changes to drinking water systems. General Work – Welding, cutting, soldering, brazing, grinding, demolition or renovation, of building. Hazardous Material Work - Exposure to biological hazards or biological agents. Industrial Hygiene - Permit required confined space entries; Respirator fit testing; Laser Work - Operation of Class IIIB or Class IV lasers Nuclear Operations – Maintenance/Operation Of Important to Safety (ITS) Structures, Systems or Components Radiological - Work in a Contamination Area. Work in a Radiation Area. Work with HAZ 3 sources. Transportation - Operation of vehicle requiring DOT license
Work Scope Complexity Examples
Page 25
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Activity Screening/Binning Tool
Type IV WP; Cat III TP
Type IV WP; Cat III TP
Type IV WP; Cat III TP
Work Scope Complexity
Consequence of Improper Performance
Frequency
Infrequent (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Very (4, 5)
Infrequent (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Very (4, 5)
Moderate/High(3, 4, 5)
Low (1, 2)
High (4, 5)
Infrequent (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Very (4, 5)
Infrequent (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Very (4, 5)
Moderate/High(3, 4, 5)
Low (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Infrequent (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Very (4, 5)
Infrequent (1, 2)
Moderate (3)
Very (4, 5)
Moderate/High(3, 4, 5)
Low (1, 2)
Low (1, 2)
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type I WP; Cat I TP
Type I WP; Cat I TP
Minimum IWD Required
Minimum Training
Recommendation *
Type III WP; Cat III TP
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type IV WP; Cat III TP
Type III WP; Cat III TP
Type II WP; Cat II TP
Type III WP; Cat III TP
Type III WP; Cat III TP
Type II WP; Cat III TP
1, 2, 3
1, 2
1, 2
3, 4, 5
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3
4, 5
3, 4, 5
1, 2, 3
4, 5
4, 5
3, 4, 5
4, 5
4, 5
4, 5
TP = Technical Procedure (Category I, II or III)
WP = Work Package (Type I, II, III, or IV)
Integrated Work Document (IWD) Legend * Not a requirement. Suggestion for Planning purposes only.
Training Legend
1 = OJT/Skills Evaluation2 = Formal Classroom w Exam3 = Classroom Briefing No Exam4 = Crew/Shift/Pre-Job Briefing
5 = Minor Work (No Additional Trng)
““Establishes a process”Establishes a process”
Page 26
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
3 Integrated Work Control Documents (IWDs)
• Four Work Package Types (I, II, III, IV)– Each based upon the level of rigor required– Type I is most rigorous with strictest controls– Type IV is “minor work”– Standardized template planned
Page 27
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
3 Integrated Work Control Documents (IWDs)
• Technical Procedures– 3 Categories (In-Hand, General Use, Reference Use)
• Used for Routine/Repetitive work
• Based upon DOE-STD-1029, Writer’s Guide for Technical Procedures
• Project Level Construction Documents– Applies to new or major alterations that require REOP/EP– Work packages not required IF and ONLY IF other more
appropriate mechanisms are used to ensure safety• Design documents• QA Plans, Hold Points, Safety Manuals, Inspections, etc.
– Responsible Manager can always use Work Packages– All other Construction work requires work packages
Page 28
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Skill of the Worker (SOTW)
• Broadened definition vs. SOT “Craft”– Applicable to all trades and professions
• Concept is applied as an Administrative Control• Applicable to all levels of work• Allows more focus on the control of hazards• Reduces details of the instruction set when SOTW is
verified• Requires a Skill of the Worker Record
– Listing of the tasks– Proof of training and qualification required
Page 29
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Work Planner Training & Qualifications
Core Work Planner Qualification
Maintenance & Construction Work
Planner Qualification
Nuclear Maintenance Work Planner Qualification
Diagnostics Work Planner
Homeland Security Work Planner
Organizational Work Planner Quals – Based
upon the “Core” Work Planner Qualification
Page 30
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Implementation
• NSTec was given a Performance Objective by local Nevada Site Office to integrate the existing work control programs
• Met the Performance Objective by developing the NSTec Integrated Work Control Manual
• Work Control affects many organizational documents• Developed an Implementation Plan• Full implementation targeted for September 19, 2008
(Future Effective Date)
Page 31
NSTec Risk & Work Configuration as a Function of ISM
Vision • Service • Partnership
T10
0EE
U04
2307
Contact Information
• Lana Buehrer– (702) 295-2575
– E-Mail: [email protected]
• Paul Cakanic– (702) 295-7502
– E-Mail: [email protected]