+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Painless abdominoplasty :

Painless abdominoplasty :

Date post: 14-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: golda
View: 44 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Painless abdominoplasty :. The efficacy of combined intercostal and pararectus blocks in reducing postoperative pain and recovery time. Lu-Jean F eng, M.D. The L u-Jean F eng C linic • Pepper P ike, OH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
15
THE EFFICACY OF COMBINED INTERCOSTAL AND PARARECTUS BLOCKS IN REDUCING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND RECOVERY TIME PAINLESS ABDOMINOPLASTY: Lu-Jean Feng, M.D. The Lu-Jean Feng Clinic • Pepper Pike, OH Dept. of Plastic Surgery • Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine • Cleveland, OH Nothing to disclose
Transcript
Page 1: Painless  abdominoplasty :

THE EFFICACY OF COMBINED INTERCOSTAL AND

PARARECTUS BLOCKS IN REDUCING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND RECOVERY TIME

PAINLESS ABDOMINOPLASTY:

Lu-Jean Feng, M.D.The Lu-Jean Feng Clinic • Pepper Pike,

OHDept. of Plastic Surgery • Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine •

Cleveland, OHNothing to disclose

Page 2: Painless  abdominoplasty :

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined

intercostal and pararectus blocks for pain control

after abdominoplasty by comparing clinical

outcomes of patients who had no blocks versus those

who had the blocks

OBJECTIVE OF STUDY

Page 3: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Recovery room records of 209 patients who underwent abdominoplasties from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Recovery room pain scores, pain medications used, and length of time in recovery room were studied

A.

B.

continued . . .

Page 4: Painless  abdominoplasty :

The records of patient questionnaires sent 6 weeks after surgery were also evaluated

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The questionnaires queried patient’s pain scores at home, use of narcotics, level of nausea, when they resumed driving and normal activities, and when they were pain-free

C.

D.

continued . . .

Page 5: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Twenty patients met criteria of the control group (no local anesthesia nor nerve blocks)

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-seven patients met criteria of the treatment group (local anesthesia in skin, intercostal block T7 to T12 prior to incision, pararectus block before plication)

E.

F.

Page 6: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Comparision of pain scores in the recovery room for the control group versus the

treatment group

Page 7: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Comparision of narcotics given in the recovery room for the

control group versus the treatment group

Page 8: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Comparision of length of time in the recovery room for the

control group versus the treatment group

Page 9: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Longitudinal pain score comparison between

treatment group and control group

Page 10: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Comparison of patients taking narcotics at home following

abdominoplasty for the control versus treatment group

Page 11: Painless  abdominoplasty :

The level of nausea experienced at home. The

treatment group had significantly less nausea.

Page 12: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Time to pain-free state. The treatment group reached a pain-free state significantly

sooner

Page 13: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Time to resume driving. The treatment group began driving

significantly sooner.

Page 14: Painless  abdominoplasty :

Time to resume normal activities or return to work. 88% of the treatment group

began driving within 2 weeks.

Page 15: Painless  abdominoplasty :

CONCLUSION:

•Successful long-term relief of pain after abdominoplasty

was achieved with a combination of intercostal,

ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric and pararectus blocks.•Prevention of post-op pain

reduces recovery time and allows for faster return to work

and normal activities.Unabridged version in November 2010 issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery


Recommended