+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Date post: 31-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: nick-nicholas
View: 721 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Presentation on paradata in the context of standards used in education technology. Presentation given at the IDEA012 conference ( http://www.idea.edu.au/?page_id=56 ), panel on "Standards development for open content and online assessment", Dec 5 2012
10
Education Services Australia Paradata Standard Nick Nicholas
Transcript
Page 1: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Education Services Australia

Paradata StandardNick Nicholas

Page 2: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Education Services Australia• Standards critical to what we do• Interoperability & Specification• Education Vocabularies Australia (RDF, SKOS)• Schools Online Thesaurus (RDF, SKOS)• Machine Readable Australian Curriculum (RDF,

DC, ASN)• ANZ LOM for NDLRN resources (LOM)• Identity Projects (OpenId, SAML, SIF)• Improve (IMS QTI)• Paradata (LR Paradata)

Page 3: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Paradata• Usage analytics of digital

learning resources• Quantitative metrics• How often was this resource downloaded?

• Paedagogic context, inferred through user actions• Where was this resource taught?• How was this resource aligned with the

curriculum?• What kinds of teachers used the resource?

• Cf. Metadata, provided by experts

Page 4: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Paradata• Usage analytics of digital

learning resources• Individual or Aggregated• A teacher from Victoria used this resource in a

Year 3 Geography class last Tuesday• 347 users accessed this resource last month

Page 5: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Why?• Improved search ranking• Communities of practice• Feedback to publishers• Feedback to jurisdictions• Discovery across portals• Discovery outside portals

Page 6: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

History• Initially defined 2010• National Science Digital Library, XSD• Learning Registry, 2011• Several US participants, UK, EU• Moving towards LRMI (Schema.org)

• ADL, 2012 (TinCan)• Specifications based on ActivityStreams• Same overall structure, differ in some

attributes and level of strictness

Page 7: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Web 2.0 Standard• Represented in JSON• Lightweight (to deploy & to consume)• Open-ended• No managed vocabularies• Key-value pairs• A few fixed structural keys• Statements: predicates• actor, verb, object (the resource), context• “(John) (liked) (War and Peace) (on

Facebook)”

Page 8: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Example“Seven Victorian English teachers aligned learning resource R7878 to Australian Curriculum content description ACELA1326”

•Activity•Verb: •Action: aligned•Measure:

•MeasureType: count•Value: 7

•Actor:•Description: VIC, English•objectType: teacher

•Object:•ID: R7878•objectType: Learning resource

•Related:•ID: ACELA1326•objectType: academic standard

Page 9: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Web 2.0 (loose) standard• Yes, Risk of splintering• Of vocabularies• Of structure• Of management

• But: Easy adoption• Easy to implement• Easy to customise• Harness existing infrastructure• Which are standards

Page 10: Paradata standards presentation, IDEA012

Links• Learning Registry:

• http://www.learningregistry.org/documents• http://www.commoncorelabs.com/

• TinCan:• http://www.adlnet.gov/capabilities/tla/experi

ence-api• ActivityStreams:

• http://activitystrea.ms/ • Australian Paradata Blog

• http://australianparadata.wordpress.com


Recommended