/22
ParametricDecayInstability(PDI)inTokamaks
GuangyeChen,FrederickJaeger,LeeBerry,JimMyra(Lodestar)
TheodoreBiewer,PhillipRyan,JohnWilgenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar
11/23/2009
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009 1
/22
WhatisPDI?• InaheaOngexperiment,linearwavescanbeexcitedbyexternalsources.
• Ahighamplitudewave(pumpwave@f0)cannon‐linearlyexciteotherwaves(daughterwaves@f1,f2).– ParOcleswithoscillatoryvelocityu(f0).– FluctuaOngdensityn(f2).– TheabovetwoquanOOesproduceacurrentnu,whichcandriveaplasmawaveatf1(=f2‐f0).
– Theplasmawave(f1)andtheoscillatoryvelocityatpumpfrequency(f0)producesaponderomoOveforcethatdrivesthelowfrequencyperturbaOon.
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009 2
/22
PDIandEdgeIonHeaOnginIBWandICRFExperiments
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
Rost2002,CMODPinsker1993,DIII‐D
Wilgen2006,NSTXBiewer2005,NSTX
antenna freq.
Probe NPAERDReflectometer
a b
c d
3
/22
MoOvaOon• PDIhasbeenwidelyobservedintokamakICRFandIBWheaOngexperiments(NSTX,AlcatorC‐MOD,DIII‐D,TST‐2,HT‐7,etc.).
• PDIinthescrape‐off‐layer(SOL)canleadtosignificantpowerloss,degradingtherfheaOngefficiencyinthebulkplasma(eg.directIBW).
• OnNSTX,edgePDIlossaccountsfor30%oftotalrfpower(alowerboundesOmate).
• WeneedamorequanOtaOveunderstandingofPDI.
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009 4
/22
Outline
• KineOctheoryandmodelequaOons• Numericalmethods
• AORSA1DsimulaOonsandPDIdispersioncalculaOons– AlcatorC‐MOD– NSTX
• Summary
• Futurework
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009 5
/22
• MaxwellianplasmainaoscillaOngframe,,
• VlasovequaOonintheoscillaOngframe:
• ,• SoluOons,with
• ElectrostaOctheory:chargedensity+Poisson’sequaOonNonlinearCoupling
OscillaOngFrame,KineOcTheory
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
dipolepump
6
/22
PDIModelEquaOons
• Pumpwaveissolvedindependently,andassumedconstantintheSOL
• Daughterwavesaresolvedby
• SlecOonrules:
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
€
−c 2
ω02 ∇ ×∇ ×E0( ) + K0 ⋅E0 = −
iε0ω0
Jantenna
€
−c 2
ω12 ∇ ×∇ ×E1( ) + K1 ⋅E1 = C1(E0,E1,E2) −
iε0ω1
Jnoise,1
€
−c 2
ω22 ∇ ×∇ ×E2( ) + K2 ⋅E2 = C2(E0,E1,E2) −
iε0ω2
Jnoise,2
€
ω0 =ω1 +ω2
k0 = k1 + k2
Nonlinearcouplingterms
7
/22
SuccessiveApproximaOonsDivergeforLargeCoupling
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
FastwaveIBW+Quasi‐Mode
Weakcoupling
Strongercoupling
IteraOvemethodagreeswithdirect
method
IteraOvemethoddiverges
8
/22
PDISimulaOonsforAlcatorC‐MOD
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
f2 53.4 MHz f3 26.6 MHz Te 15 eV Ti 3 eV ne 1 x 1019 m-3 B0 5.3 T rt 0.9 m ky 2000 m-1
40
ExponenOalgrowthofthedaughterfield
€
nφ
Pumpfield(a.u.)
E(IBW)(a.u.)
9
/22
Whichwavestosimulate?
• PDIdaughterwavessaOsfytheselecOonrules.
• Oneofthedaughterwavesisalinearplasmawave.
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
€
ω0 =ω1 +ω2
k0 = k1 + k2
10
/22
TwoBranchesofIBW’s
• • Damping(lel)<<damping(right)• Slow convergence for large
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
€
ω2 /Ωc = 2
Ar3ficialdampingapplied Ioncyclotrondamping
€
k⊥€
k⊥ (left) << k⊥ (right)
11
/22
IBWDispersionRelaOon&DecayChannels
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
FASTWAVE
QM IBW
IBW QM
QM IBW
CMODMinorityhea3ngregime
12
/22
PDIDispersionRelaOon
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
€
E⊥ = 9kV /m
€
E⊥ = 45kV /m
CMODMinorityhea3ngregime
MOST UNSTABLE MODE
13
Growth rate
/22
Diamond‐shape‐waveExcitaOon
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
amplificaOon
damping
WKBapproximaOon
14
/22
PDIThresholdConsistentwithExperiment
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
Linear3DAORSAsimulaOonspredicttypicalfastwaveedgeamplitude=(5,12)kV/[email protected]. ScalingtrendsforthePDIthresholdbehaviorwithdensity,temperatureareconsistentwithRef.[Rost2002].
ExponenOalgrowth
FastwaveIBW+QM
noise
CMODMinorityhea3ngregime
15
/22
PDISimulaOonsforNSTX
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
• DaughterIBWamplitudesvs.frequencyatafixedpointintheedge.
• BothweakandstrongPDIaresimulated.
• Peaksareseparatedbythecyclotronfrequencyattheprobe().
• SimulaOonparameters:– Te=Ti=50eV,– ne=2x1018m‐3,
– =0.45T– ky=7000m‐1,=15
€
nφ
Antennafrequency
Logscale
probemeasurements[Diem,APS04]
€
Ωi
€
Ωi
€
Bφ
16
/22
PDIDispersionRelaOon
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
Growthrate
MOST UNSTABLE MODE
17
/22
PDIDependenceConsistentwithEdgeIonHeaOngMeasurements
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
€
kφ
RelaOveAmplitu
deofP
DI
Gen
erated
IBW
PRF=1.2‐1.3MW
€
Bφ = 0.5 T
Predicted power threshold is consistent with previous reflectometer measurements (100 to 300kW), (Wilgen 2005).
18
/22
Summary• Fastwave‐>IBW+QMissuccessfullyexcitedusingtheextendedAORSAcode.
• Themostunstablemodesarefoundtobethewavesexcitedjustabovethecyclotronharmonic.
• PDIsimulaOonsareconsistentwiththethresholdreportedinminorityheaOngexperimentsonAlcator
C‐MOD.• PDIsimulaOonsshowthethresholddecreaseswith,consistentwiththeedgeionheaOngmeasurements.
• PredictedPDIthresholdinNSTXisabout100KW,consistentwithpreviousreflectometermeasurements.
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
€
kφ
19
/22
FutureWorkCorehea?ngvs.edgeionhea?nginNSTX
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
Bphi=0.45T Bphi=0.55T
??
J.Hosea,etal.Phys.Plasmas15,056104(2008)
a b
c d
20
/22
FutureWorkCorehea?ngvs.edgeionhea?nginNSTX
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
Bphi=0.45T Bphi=0.55T
c d
e f
Alerrfison
Beforerfison
262728 212223
21
/22
AnotherExample
G.ChenFusionEnergyDivisionseminar11/23/2009
222324
G.Taylor,APS‐DPP2009
22