Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | carmel-norton |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Parks and Recreation Division
December 15, 2009
PARK LAND ACQUISITION
• Overview
• Land Selection Process
• Board Action
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Overview
• Land Selection ProcessLand Selection Process
• Board ActionBoard Action
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
OVERVIEW
Chronology
• Park Impact Fee – March 2006
• Park Growth Analysis – November 2006
• Land Banking Discussion – October 2008
• Developed Criteria – March 2009
• Parks Advisory Board – September 2009
• Presentation today on potential properties for purchase with Park Impact Fees.
• Projected population growth through 2030
• Inventoried Community and District parks in County and cities
• Identified service gaps in geographic areas based on future population
− Deficient 9 Community Parks
− Deficient 9 District Parks
OVERVIEW
Park Growth Analysis Recap
OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW
• Insufficient funds for new park construction
• Operating funds not available for new parks or facilities
• Results in minimal maintenance costs
• Maintains current acreage level of service
• Meets Impact Fee Ordinance requirements
• Meets identified needs
• Favorable market conditions
Benefits of Purchasing Property for Land Banking
OVERVIEW
• Budget FY 09 $6,500,000
• Rybolt Property Acquisition (1,000,000)
• Apopka Loop Connector (680,000)
• Dr. Phillips Gym Funding 880,000*
Remaining Balance $5,700,000
*Requesting Board Approval
Approved Land Acquisition Budget
• Overview Overview
• Land Selection Process
• Board ActionBoard Action
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
LAND SELECTION PROCESS
Step 1:• Researched properties for sale in park
deficient areas identified in the Park Growth Analysis
Step 2:• Applied scoring criteria to identified
properties− Similar scoring criteria used in past years for Parks
CIP Program− Scoring criteria approved by Parks Advisory Board
Step 3:• Ranked properties based on highest scores
(maximum score possible 740)
LAND SELECTION PROCESS
LAND SELECTION PROCESS
Property Description Deficient Service Area
N. Rock Springs Rd./Baptist Camp Rd. Northwest Orange County
Pine Rd./Sadler Rd. Northwest Orange County
Round Lake Rd./South of Sadler Rd. Northwest Orange County
Apopka Loop Opt. 1 Northwest Orange County
Apopka Loop Opt. 2 Northwest Orange County
Avalon Rd. / S.R. 429 Southwest Orange County
S.R. 417/ U.S. 441 South Orange County
S. Orange Ave. South Orange County
S. Orange Ave. at Bear Crossing Dr. South Orange County
E. Wetherbee Rd./W. of Boggy Creek Rd. South Orange County
Narcoossee Rd./Tyson Rd. Southeast Orange County
Narcoossee Rd./ S.R. 417 Southeast Orange County
Young Pine Rd./South of Curry Ford Rd. East Orange County
Innovation Way at S. Alafaya Trail East Orange County
C.R. 13/West of S.R. 520 East Orange County
LAND SELECTION PROCESS
Scoring Matrix
• Park Growth Analysis – 300 pts.
– Current Need vs. Future Need
• Access to Site – 100 pts.
– Arterial Road Access
• Developable Acres – 100 pts.
– Accommodate Amenities for Active Recreation
LAND SELECTION PROCESS
Scoring Matrix
• Clean and Clear Site – 50 pts.
– Environmental Concerns
• Located in Urban Service Area – 50 pts.
– Utilities Available
• Water Access – 140 pts.
– Additional Recreation Opportunities
• Proximity to Existing Parks – (150) pts.
LAND SELECTION PROCESS
Property Description Score Rank
Innovation Way at S. Alafaya Trail 503 1
N. Rock Springs Rd./Baptist Camp Rd. 490 2
S.R. 417/ U.S. 441 482 3
S. Orange Ave. 477 4
Narcoossee Rd./Tyson Rd. 442 5
E. Wetherbee Rd./W. of Boggy Creek Rd. 432 6
Young Pine Rd./South of Curry Ford Rd. 239 7
Round Lake Rd./South of Sadler Rd. 235 8
Narcoossee Rd./ S.R. 417 220 9
Avalon Rd. / S.R. 429 207 10
C.R. 13/West of S.R. 520 195 11
S. Orange Ave. at Bear Crossing Dr. 170 12
Apopka Loop Opt. 1 132 13
Apopka Loop Opt. 2 107 14
Pine Rd./Sadler Rd. 75 15
• Overview Overview
• Land Selection ProcessLand Selection Process
• Board Action
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
BOARD ACTION
• Approval to transfer Park Impact Fee funds from the Dr. Phillips Gym project to the Land Acquisition Program
• Approval for staff to begin acquisition of ranked properties, subject to negotiations to include such factors as property cost, availability, location, etc.
Parks and Recreation Division
December 15, 2009
PARK LAND ACQUISITION