Particle Physics in a nutshell

Particle Physics in a Nutshell(or “the things we do at CERN”)

Raquel Gomez AmbrosioUniversita & INFN @Torino & CMS @CERN

Introduction at Maplesoft

June 13, 2016

Raquel Gomez Ambrosio Particle Physics in a Nutshell June 13, 2016 1 / 53

HiggsTools

HiggsTools is one of the many training networks from the Marie Sk lodowska-Curie Actions.

13 European Universities4 Research Institutes (DESY, MPI, PSI, CERN)3 Private Partners (Maplesoft, Wolfram, Shell)

20 students & several senior physicists


higgstoolsAosta Valley, Italy. July 2015


higgstools

Aosta Valley, Italy. July 2015


higgstools

Where I work


My supervisors

Chiara Mariotti (CMS)Giampiero Passarino (Univ. of Turin)


higgstools

Main Experiements at LHC

ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, ALICE


higgstools

Disclaimer

Summarized and incomplete history of theStandard Model


higgstools

Historical Introduction: The Greek

Until the XIX century, humans didn’t think too much about the constituents of matter, but ratherabout their properties. Studying them through alchemy and chemistry.

In the IV century B.C. some greek thinkers (Δημόκριτος, Επίκουρος) proposed the idea of theatom as the smallest component of matter.

But the idea was thrown down by Αριστοτέλης and his school, alleging that if matter wouldbe discrete instead of continuous, that would imply some kind of vacuum inside it, which is anuncomfortable concept.

Philosophy and Physics have always been closely related.


higgstools

Historical Introduction: The 19th Century

In the XIX century scientists became more interested in the nature of matter: Dalton confirmedLaviosier’s law for conservation of matter and Avogrado postulated his law for the number ofparticles in a gas. Defying the previously accepted interpretation.

This was finally confirmed with Mendeleev and the periodic table in 1869.


higgstools

The 20th century: The Golden Years for particle physics

By the beginning of the XX century everyone had their own atomic model: Thomson, Rutherford,Bohr, Sommerfeld, Schrodinger, Dirac . . .

And the foundations of particle physics where established:

1897: Discovery of the electron (J.J. Thomson)

1911: Discovery of the proton (Rutherford)

1932: Discovery of the neutron (Chadwick)


higgstools

The 20th Century: The Golden Years for particle physics

Things seemed to finally make sense, but that wouldn’t last long. In the following years, particle-detecting techniques (and technologies) improved and dozens of new particles were found.


higgstools



Some had been predicted by the theorists: pions (π0, π+, π−), positron (e+), neutrinos (ν) . . .


higgstools



Some had been predicted by the theorists: pions (π0, π+, π−), positron (e+), neutrinos (ν) . . .

But other were completely gratuitous: µ, K0, K+, K−, Λ, Ξ−, Ξ0, Ω0 , . . .

The lightest of these particles were called leptons, the intermediate ones were called mesons, andthe heaviest were called baryons


higgstools

Murray Gell-Mann: The Eightfold way

Murray Gell-Mann decided to sort the mesons and baryons in octets, according to their properties


higgstools

Murray Gell-Mann: The Eightfold wayMurray Gell-Mann decided to sort the mesons and baryons in octets, according to their properties


higgstools

Some group theory: SU(N)

Group thery was already a tool used in particle physics: At that time, SU(2) was known to be thegroup characterizing “spin”, the 3 generators of SU(2) are called ”Pauli Matrices” by physicists.

For the case of mesons and baryons, SU(3) seemed to be more appropriate: SU(3) acts on 3elements and has rank 2 (i.e. 2 Casimir operators). Casimir operators are very important inphysics, we use them to characterize objects. In the case of the eightfold way: Q and S.

Look at the fundamental representation:

3 ⊗ 3 = 8 ⊕ 13 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1

The elements of the vector space where this group acts where called “Quarks”. In particular: Up,Down, and Strange (u,d,s).


higgstools

Murray Gell-Mann: The Quarks

This is how the “Quark model” was established. Murray Gell-Mann won the nobel prize in 1969.And he deserves to be called The Mendeleev of physics

and, yes, we do call the generators of SU(3) “Gell-Mann matrices” . . .


higgstools

J/Ψ

In 1974 something dramatic happened: a heavy meson with a very long mean life was discovered.

“It’s as though someone came upon an isolated village in Peru or the Caucasus where peoplelive to be 70,000 years old.” D.Griffths


higgstools

J/Ψ

After some months of debate the riddle was solved: If we have 4 fundamental leptons (e, νe , µ, νµ)why not have 4 fundamental quarks too?

Gell-Mann’s flavor symmetry was promoted, SU(3) → SU(4) and the Quark model survived. Thefourth Quark was called “Charm” (as well as the new casimir operator).


higgstools

The Standard Model

More leptons and quarks were discovered until we arrived to the current picture: These are thefundamental particles that constitute all matter that we know.


higgstools

Interlude: Quantum Mechanics, the change of paradigm

Recall, in the early XX century we lived the Quantum revolution. Planck, Born, DeBroglie, Einstein,Heisenberg, Schrodinger, . . . had established a very successful framework in which particles wereneither waves nor matter. But both at the same time.


higgstools

Interlude: Quantum Mechanics, the change of paradigm

Quantum Coffee, TorontoRaquel Gomez Ambrosio Particle Physics in a Nutshell June 13, 2016 20 / 53

higgstools

The Standard Model: Tomonaga, Feynman, Schwinger (& Dyson)

Particles can not be described as tiny static spheres. We understand particles to be perturbationsin a field, and as such they are described by a wave function.

The wave function, tells us the probability of finding the particle in a certain point at a certaintime. For instance, for an electron:

LDirac = ψ(i~cγµ∂µ −mc2)ψ, ψ → ψe iθ︸︷︷︸Global U(1) symmetry

The γ matrices are the 4-dim representation of SU(2),however we like to call them “Dirac Matrices”


higgstools



What happens if we promote the global symmetry to a local one: θ → θ(x)?The Lagrangian will be symmetric under a local U(1) as long as . . .

Aµ → Aµ −1

qe∂µθ(x), ∂µ → Dµ = ∂µ + iqeAµ

L = LDirac −1

4FµνFµν , Fµν = ∂µAν − ∂νAµ


higgstools



What happens if we promote the global symmetry to a local one: θ → θ(x)?The Lagrangian will be symmetric under a local U(1) as long as . . .

Aµ → Aµ −1

qe∂µθ(x), ∂µ → Dµ = ∂µ + iqeAµ

L = LDirac −1

4FµνFµν , Fµν = ∂µAν − ∂νAµ

The new field Aµ is the photon! It appeared naturally by making our global symmetry local.


higgstools

Yang-Mills theories

In 1954, C.N. Yang and R. Mills decided to extend this technique to other Lagrangians, withnon-abelian symmetry groups. And they found that it worked pretty well.

Strong force → SU(3): 8 new fields (dimension of SU(3)), called Gluons: Gµν

Weak Force → SU(2): 3 new fields: Z0,W+,W−

The Gauge Bosons Z0,W+,W− were observed at CERN in 1983. Thanks to some experimentsdesigned by Carlo Rubbia and Simon Van der Meer.

They also got their Nobel Prize . . . those were great years for particle physics.


higgstools

The Standard Model: Electromagnetic, Electroweak and Strong Force

Particle Fever


The Standard Model: Electromagnetic, Electroweak and Strong Force


higgstools

Unfortunately it is not so easy . . .

On one hand, the weak force is entangled with the electromagnetic one → SU(2) ⊗ U(1)

On the other hand, the fields of SU(2) are not really Z0,W+,W−, but a mixture of them.

Such a “mixture”, i.e. the breaking of a symmetry, must imply the appearance of newparticles (one per broken symmetry, Goldstone’s theorem )

And this new particle appearing is . . .


higgstools


higgstools

The Higgs Mechanism

The Higgs boson can not be classified as “matter” (like leptons and quarks) nor as a gaugefield (like photons, gluons . . . )

In 1964, Brout, Englert and Higgs came up with an interpretation of the Higgs as a “sea ofparticles where all other particles float”

Englert and Higgs won the Nobel Prize for this in 2013


higgstools


higgstools

Long Story Short:

The Higgs boson messes up everything


higgstools

The “true” Standard Model Lagrangian


higgstools

Higgs Boson searches

Finally, you are ready to hear about my work . . .


higgstools

The Higgs boson

On July 4th 2012, the Higgs boson discovery was officially announced at CERN.


higgstools

Higgs Boson Production at LHC. For a theorist: Feynman Diagrams

Gluon-Gluon Fusion: Main production channel

Vector Boson Fusion: Second most important channel

If you want more . . . click here:http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/The_Higgs_Boson_discovery


http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/The_Higgs_Boson_discovery

higgstools

Higgs Boson Production at LHC. For an experimentalist: Events


higgstools

CMS Detector, the Compact Muon Solenoid


higgstools

CMS Detector, the Compact Muon Solenoid


higgstools

CMS Detector, the Compact Muon Solenoid: Pileup


higgstools

CMS Detector, the Compact Muon Solenoid: Pileup


higgstools

The interface between theorists and experimentalists: The analysis

A big part of our work is to find a common framework fortheorists and experimentalists to work together


higgstools

The analysisThis is the main process that we study in Turin: Vector Boson Fusion

p

p

Tagged jet 1

Tagged jet 2

Underlying Events

Underlying Events


higgstools

The Higgs decays before it can be detected

H

Z

Z

e−

e+

µ+

µ−

H

W−

W+

e−

νeµ+

νµ

Given any of this processes, and the initial conditions, it is relatively easy for a theorist toprovide a prediction for it (i.e, a numerical value for the probability of it to happen)

But . . .we don’t really know the initial conditions!

Also, processes in the detector interfere with each other, they are not isolated.


higgstools

The Monte Carlo generators

One dimensional Monte Carlo generator:

One of the challenges for the next years is to develop the technology to calculate the biggestpossible amount of Monte Carlo events, with the maximum precision and the minimum amount ofentropy (i.e. computer memory and time)


The analysis

A theoretical prediction looks more like this:


higgstools

How do you compare observations with predictions, then?

Monte Carlo generators + Experimental data

These are called “The Nobel plots”


higgstools

New physics?

Since this is a historical talk, I have to tell you about amight-be historical event


higgstools

December 2015 . . . it happened again


higgstools

It could be just an statistical artifact

The fluctuation is inside the “margin of error”


higgstools

However, no one seems to care:

Number of submissions related to the new resonance, by date: Until today, 445

(Credits: Dr.Andre David, http://jsfiddle.net/adavid/bk2tmc2m/show/)


http://jsfiddle.net/adavid/bk2tmc2m/show/

higgstools

Are we in front of new physics?

We live for sure exciting times for particle physics

However we will only get confirmation about this discovery in August at ICHEP conferencein Chicago. Feel free to ask me about it then!

Even if this new particle gets ruled out, we have plenty of work to do . . .


higgstools

Open questions in particle physics

Main question now is: How can we incorporate gravity to the SM

In principle it is possible to formulate gravity as a Yang-Mills theory, with symmetry group SO(3,1),or “Lorenz group” for physicists.SO(3,1) is isomorphic to SU(2)⊗SU(2) and would correspond to a gauge boson with Spin 2.However, after doing this one encounters fundamental problems, mainly:

How to quantize this theory (i.e., make it compatible with quantum physics)

How to renormalize this theory (i.e., make it convergent at very high energies)

Is the 750 particle “the” Graviton?


higgstools


higgstools

Recommended reading:

“Introduction to Elementary Particles ”, D. Griffiths (very easy)

“Diagrammatica: The Path to Feynman Diagrams”, M. Veltman (advanced)

“Simple Introduction to Particle Physics” (mathematical)( click here: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.3328v1.pdf)


http://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.3328v1.pdf

Date post:	10-Jan-2017
Category:	Science
Upload:	raquel-gomez-ambrosio
View:	40 times
Download:	6 times

Particle Physics in a nutshell

Science