+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species....

Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species....

Date post: 15-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kenya-reaves
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
12
THE CONCENTRATION OF CALCIUM IN BONES Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins
Transcript
Page 1: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

THE CONCENTRATION OF CALCIUM IN BONES

Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins

Page 2: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Why we are doing this?* Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species.*Species:• Cow• Pig• Deer

* The two methods will be a whole bone soaking and a ground-up bone soaking both in vinegar.

Page 3: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Proposed Procedure1. Soak the bones in boiling water to take the meat off just leaving the

cartilage and bone.2. Dry the bones overnight to remove any excess water off the bones.3. Mass the femurs of each animal.4. Put the femurs of each animal into a container and fill with vinegar to

completely cover the bones. Let them soak for a week.5. Take the tibias of each animal and cut a 1 inch section from each bone. 6. Crush the bone using a mortor and pestle and mass 5 grams of bone

from the ground bones.7. Put each 5g portion in a 150mL beaker and add 100mL of vinegar. Let

them soak for a week.8. Make a .01M solution of EDTA using 1.8600g of EDTA in 500mL of DI

water.9. Make a .1M solution of CaCO3 using 1.000g of CaCO3 in 2M HCl. Make an

ammonia buffer with 6M NH4OH and adding 6M HCl until the pH is 10.00.10. Standardize the EDTA solution with 3mL of the CaCO3, 5mL of ammonia

buffer, and 4 drops of calmagite indicator. Repeat two more times.11. Remove the bones from the vinegar and allow the bones to dry. Record

the volume of vinegar used for the whole bones. 12. Take 5mL of the vinegar solution, 5mL of ammonia buffer, and 4 drops of

calmagite and titrate to the blue endpoint with the standardized EDTA.13. Do this titration 3 times for each whole bone vinegar solution and 3

times for each ground up bone vinegar solution.14. Calculate the concentration of calcium in each vinegar solution.

Page 4: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

ResultsStandardizatio

n Of EDTA First

Trial mL EDTA [EDTA] Average [ ] Standard Dev.

1 13.09 .00916

.00870 .0009172 15.70 .00764

3 12.91 .00929

Masses:

Bones (Type) Mass:

Deer (Whole Bone) 108.5450

Lamb (Whole Bone) 76.4206

Hog (Whole Bone) 292.5120

Deer (Ground Up) 4.9180

Lamb (Ground Up) 5.0013

Hog (Ground Up) 5.0097

Page 5: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Results (Cont.)

Whole Bone Titration

Deer Lamb Hog

Trail 1 39.69 45.90 20.00

Trail 2 39.89 45.90 17.75

Trail 3 40.04 45.91 17.89

% Ca2+ (Trial 1) .012745 .020934 .002383

% Ca2+ (Trial 2) .012809 .020934 .002115

% Ca2+ (Trial 3) .012857 .020939 .002132

Average % Ca2+ .012804 .020936 .002210

Standard Dev. .0000564 .00000263 .000150

Page 6: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Results (Cont.)

Standardization Of EDTA Second

Trail mL EDTA [EDTA] Average Standard Dev.

1 12.21 .02455

.02458 .000023092 12.19 .02459

3 12.19 .02459

Page 7: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Results (Cont.)

Ground Bone Titration

Deer Lamb Hog

Trial 1 44.79 55.79 57.09

Trail 2 41.59 56.55 53.62

Trail 3 42.30 57.40 55.35

% Ca2+ (Trial 1) .008971 .010988 .011225

% Ca2+ (Trial 2) .008330 .011137 .010543

% Ca2+ (Trial 3) .008472 .011305 .010883

Average % Ca2+ .008591 .011143 .010833

Standard Dev. .000337 .000159 .000341

Page 8: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Sample Calculations

Page 9: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Discussion

The purpose of this lab was to extract calcium from bones using vinegar (acetic acid).

Acetic acid breaks apart CaCO3 in the bones leaving the Ca2+ ion floating in the vinegar and producing CO2 .

This was observed when bubbles were forming around the bones when they were in the vinegar.

Page 10: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Discussion Cont.

We formed a hypothesis that the hog would have the most calcium in it while the lamb would have the least amount of calcium in it.

Our data proves otherwise. In both methods, the lamb had the highest percent of calcium.

Grinding up the bones did not help extract more calcium than the whole bone soak.

Page 11: Pat Benecewicz & Nathan Tompkins. * Compare concentrations of calcium from species to species. *Species: Cow Pig Deer * The two methods will be a whole.

Discussion Cont.

A precipitate formed when we added the buffer to the vinegar. We found out that this white precipitate was Ca(OH)2. Proving that we had our target ion in the vinegar solution.

The precipitate disappeared once we reach the endpoint.


Recommended