On 14th June 2016, the
Cicely Saunders Institute (CSI)
hosted its fifth patient, family and
public involvement workshop. This
workshop was the first run as a
full day event.
The workshop included a packed
programme of presentations and
interactive sessions. Attendees
shared their experiences and
thoughts with researchers on the
overall theme “How to disseminate
our research” in the experience
sharing and skills building
sessions.
The aim of this workshop was to
learn from the impact studies con-
ducted at the CSI had in clinical
practice and how future findings
from ongoing projects can be best dissemi-
nated.
Overall feedback from the event was
positive. The majority of PPI members
felt that the workshop exceeded their
expectations and they were able to con-
tribute meaningfully.
Researchers reported that they
appreciated the opportunity to meet and
discuss with patients, carers and mem-
bers of the public after pitching their
projects in the “Dragons Den” session.
The subsequent discussion session,
which focused on dissemination and
public engagement of projects from the
CSI, was stimulated through examples
in the previous session
The next PPI workshop will be held in
November 2016 and will be informed by
the feedback from this workshop.
Summary of event
The day included a packed pro-
gramme of presentations and discus-
sions throughout.
The morning started with a skills build-
ing session looking at “How to dissemi-
nate our research”. Leading research-
ers Dr. Caroline Jolley, Dr Matthew
Maddocks, and Dr Natasha Lovell, who
researched on new non-medical and
medical interventions for breathlessness
in COPD patients, presented their study
findings and dissemination plan aiming
to demonstrate the impact on clinical
practice after the study was reported.
Marion Sumerfield facilitated an interest-
ing experience sharing session where PPI
members shared their views on where,
how and when best to disseminate the
research findings in order to reach the
community.
New ideas and interests were shared
amongst PPIs and researchers in the
“Dragon’s Den” session when researchers
were pitching their projects for potential
PPI involvement.
The day closed with the launch of our new
virtual forum presented by Sophie Pask
and Lisa Brighton in response to a recom-
mendation emerging from the very first
workshop from PPIs two years ago.
Workshop
attendees:
TEN PATIENTS, CARERS AND
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TRAVELLED FROM NEAR AND
FAR TO SHAR THEIR
EXPERIENCE.
RESEARCHERS FROM PHD
STUDENT TO SENIOR
RESEARCH FELLOW LEVEL AS
WELL AS PPI LEADS FROM
OTHER ORGANISATIONS
JOINED FOR SESSIONS
THROUGHOUT THE
AFTERNOON.
SUMMARY 1
PROGRAMME 1
FEEDBACK 2
HOW TO DIS-
SEMINATE OUR RESEARCH
3
RECOMMEN-DATIONS
4
Content Page
August 2016 Patient, Family & Public Involvement (PPI) Workshop Summary
C I C E L Y S A U N D E R S I N S T I T U T E
Patient, Family & Public Involvement (PPI)
Thank you to all for your
commitment!
Feedback from patients, family, carers
and members of the public was very
positive overall, with most attendees
saying that the different sessions were
useful, met or even exceeded their ex-
pectations.
The PPI members particularly liked the
“Dragon’s Den” session as it gave them
the opportunity to get up to speed with
the latest research projects and hear
about future opportunities to become
involved with projects presented. For
the first time, researchers from the pre-
vious Dragon’s Den came back to up-
date on the progress. This exceeded
the participants expectations on the
session.
PPI members felt passionate about
composing and disseminate messages
to the public from study results con-
ducted at the CSI.
However, many also felt that all the
sessions were too packed, which hin-
dered the discussion sessions.
Although the workshop was expanded
to a one day event, participants still
felt they had too little time for discus-
sion.
Feedback from researchers who
attended the event was also positive.
Researchers enjoyed hearing from
different views on their proposal from
PPIs and felt comfortable discussing
issues that arose.
Feedback from PPI members
Feedback from researchers
Page 2
Patient, Family & Public Involvement (PPI) Workshop
‘The workshop
gives patients/
carers/ families
the chance of
staying
connected. I
really liked the
fact that it
gives everyone
a chance to
feed back from
experience.’
Dissemination and Public
Engagement session: Useful
Dragon‘s Den: Useful
8 participants
responding
8 participants
responding
Experience sharing session
Presentations on work at the CSI (dissemination) Dissemination and Public Engagement Session
Dragon’s Den Experience Sharing session
The dissemination and Public Engagement
session was facilitated by Marion Sumer-
field, who has been a member of the CSI
PPI group since 2014. Building on from
the previous session, where participants
heard about direct impact in clinical
practice from studies conducted at the
CSI, Marion asked the group what,
where, why and how we could improve
the dissemination at the institute.
During the warming up phase of the ses-
sion, participants were asked what other
research from the CSI PPI members were
aware of. Those on social media were
best informed, and they highlighted the
value of releasing a blog post after a
scientific publication.
It was interesting to discuss the following
question, which was about where to ex-
pect to find the information. A clear mes-
sage of the need to find it in the local
community through advertisement and
dissemination i.e. in GP practices, schools,
supermarkets, mother and baby clubs as
well as lunch clubs, just to mention a few
of the public hotspots, came out to play a
major part in the dissemination strategy.
Others said that many white papers are
just lying there, but should instead be
turned into a patient, carer or staff leaf-
let to read in those hotspots.
A passionate discussion emerged when
the participants were asked why dissemi-
nation of study findings was needed. This
questions had direct links with previous
workshops where participants stated how
important it is for the CSI to educate the
public about palliative care and that
there are solutions for people in need.
The last question for this session was how the knowledge of such infor-mation would help everyone. Partici-pants raised that it is a helpful cop-ing strategy when you know that something will be available in the future for people living with a partic-ular condition. However, the infor-mation should be collated in a short, clear, readable and easy to under-stand format. The participants said a good way of reaching a broad spec-trum of the public with that sort of information would be for leaders like politicians, the government, or celeb-rities to campaign and talk about the great research produced and con-
ducted at the CSI.
After a lively discussion, everyone was certain and clear of how to bet-ter spread the messages from re-
search.
This session will inform and update the current dissemination guidelines in the institute. Thanks to Marion for
such a great session.
Dissemination and Public Engagement session summary
Page 3
Patient, Family & Public Involvement (PPI) Workshop
“You matter because you are you, and you matter to the last moment of your life. We will do all we can, not only to help you die peacefully, but to live until you die.” Dame Cicely Saunders
WAYS FORWARD:
PLAN SHORT MEETINGS
WITH CLINICAL TEAMS
TO UPDATE ON LATEST
RESEARCH
TO BE PRESENT AT
PUBLIC EVENTS OR
PUBLIC INSITUTIONS I.E.
SCHOOLS, GP,
HOTSPOTS, ETC.
THINKING ABOUT
DISSEMINATION OF THE
FINDINGS NEEDS TO
ALREADY TAKE PLACE IN
THE PLANNING PHASE
OF THE STUDY
‚It is good to know that
there will be something
available in the future as
an important coping
mechanism for the
people living with a
particular condition‘ One participant‘s responce to the
question why dissemination of study
findings is important
dissemination algorithm and guideline
being updated at the institute.
PPI members wished there would be
more participants but appreciated
hearing from other PPI groups, as
well as leaders of external groups
who attended the session.
Thank you all for your contributions
and for taking the time to make the
day a success.
The feedback from the day was posi-
tive, with participants commenting that
they appreciated having more time for
discussion and questions. PPI members
enjoyed hearing from the topic of
breathlessness and were impressed
with the impact on clinical practice
through such research. Feedback from
previous workshops have consistently
requested presentations on non-cancer
symptoms and diagnoses, and PPI
members appreciated the topic choice
as breathlessness is a symptom affect-
ing many palliative care patients.
Important contributions from the group
during the discussion session led to the
Conclusion and Recommendations for future events
Cicely Saunders Institute
Bessemer Road
Denmark Hill
SE5 9PJ
PPI working group:
Susanne de Wolf-Linder
Sophie Pask
Lisa Brighton
Louise Coulson
Ping Guo
Phone: 020 7848 5520
E-mail: [email protected]
Visit us on the web:
www.kcl.ac.uk/palliative
The Cicely Saunders Institute is the first purpose built institute for research into
palliative care and rehabilitation. We offer palliative care courses and other
resources relevant to palliative care and rehabilitation.
Palliative care is the active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive
to curative treatment. The goal is the best possible quality of life for patients and
their families, and includes control of pain and other symptoms, as well as
attention to psychological, social and spiritual problems.
The Institute brings together academics, healthcare professionals, community
organisations, patients and carers in one centre and acts as the hub for a
network of international research. It offers high quality palliative care solutions
to patients, as well as providing education, patient information and support.
The Cicely Saunders Institute opened in 2010 as the first purpose built institute for re-search into palliative care
K I N G ’ S C O L L E G E L O N D O N
Page 4
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
YOUR VALUABLE
CONTRIBUTION