+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback...

Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback...

Date post: 06-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
90
Patient First Board Report – May 2018 Family and Friends Score Budget Management Staff Engagement HSMR Patient Safety Thermometer Referral to Treatment Time A&E 4 Hours Reduce the numbers of Falls Reduce MFFD Delays Reduce the amount of Premium rate spend Staff are able to make Improvements Patient First Improvement Programme Sustainability & Transformation Plan Workforce Transformation WS Eye Care @ Southlands CWS MSK Integrated Services Junior Doctor Contract Clinical Document Management Portal True North Breakthrough Objectives Strategic Initiatives Corporate Projects Outpatient Transformation Acute Surgical Review Pathology LIMS Arrows indicate: Metrics improving Metrics stable Metrics worsening Achieving target/project on track Not achieving target/not on track
Transcript
Page 1: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Patient First Board Report – May 2018

Family and Friends Score

Budget Management Staff

Engagement

HSMR Patient Safety Thermometer

Referral to Treatment Time

A&E 4 Hours

Reduce the numbers of Falls

Reduce MFFD Delays

Reduce the amount of

Premium rate spend

Staff are able to make

Improvements

Patient First Improvement Programme

Sustainability & Transformation

Plan

Workforce Transformation

WS Eye Care @ Southlands

CWS MSK Integrated

Services

Junior Doctor Contract

Clinical Document Management

Portal

True North

Breakthrough Objectives

Strategic Initiatives

Corporate Projects

Outpatient Transformation

Acute Surgical Review

Pathology LIMS

Arrows indicate: Metrics improving Metrics stable Metrics worsening

Achieving target/project on track

Not achieving target/not on track

Page 2: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Friends and Family

Score

A&E 4 Hours

True North

Owner : Nicola Ranger

What are we trying to achieve? • Aim to achieve rates >97% positive

recommendation • Not to exceed 0.7% of not

recommended • Achieve response rate of >40% for

inpatients

What is it important to know? • All areas have achieved high

recommendation rates in April: Inpatients =97.4% outpatients = 96.7% Maternity birth = 97.5%. A&E recommend rate 91.7%

What’s gone well? • True North maintained for past 6

months on ACU, Beeding, Broadwater, Downlands Suite, Durrington , Neonatal Unit, Selsey and Tangmere Wards.

• Breast symptomatic clinics across the Trust have the best response and recommendation rates for outpatients.

What are the current challenges? • A&E response rate 11% at WH and 9.6

% at SRH.

What are we doing about them? • A&E Matron’s are monitoring FFT

responses daily to engage staff more in the process

What are the Organisational Risks? • As a result of patients having a

poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores

How are we managing them? • An action plan is in place to deliver

improvements in patient experience.

Status is AMBER and IMPROVING

Patie

nt

90%

95%

100%

Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18

Friends and Family Test - Positive Recommendation rate %

source: Dr Foster

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 6

M1 6

Page 3: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

True North

Owner : Karen Geoghegan

What are we trying to achieve? • The Trust is required to deliver a

control total surplus of £1.2m • Delivery of the financial plan

enables the Trust to access the STF income. A total of £16.3m is available to the Trust.

• Metric is variance to financial plan.

What is it important to know? • In M1, the Trust reported a control

total deficit of £1.4m which was £0.25m adverse to plan.

• The Trust needs to deliver a deficit that is no more than £0.88m at the end of Q1 to be eligible for STF funding.

What’s gone well? • Reduction in underlying pay run

rate of £0.3m • Agreement and finalisation of

contract envelopes with led commissioners that are in line with the Trust financial plan.

What are the current challenges? • Maximising productivity and throughput

to delivery elective activity plan in full. • Reduction in demand for temporary

medical staff and reduction in premium cost of temporary placements.

What are we doing about them? • Refreshed oversight and governance

of electivity activity led by Chief Operating Officer.

• Medical Working Action Group has been established with Divisional representation and Director leadership.

What are the Organisational Risks? • Local health economy

sustainability and ability of commissioners to afford activity levels.

• Achievement of the financial control total in order to be eligible to receive STF income

How are we managing them? • Close working with commissioners

through aligned incentives approach.

• Delivery of efficiency and transformation schemes., overseen by Efficiency and Workforce Steering Group.

Status is RED and IMPROVING

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 12

M1 16

Sust

aina

bilit

y

Budget Management

(7,000)

(2,000)

3,000

Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18

Financial Variance From Budget (£000s)

Page 4: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

True North

Owner : Denise Farmer

What are we trying to achieve? Ensure that all staff are fully engaged in the work of the Trust. Three key elements: 1. Able to make improvements 2. Healthy culture 3. Motivation at work

What is it important to know? • Overall Staff engagement increased to

Highest (best) 20% of Acute Trusts • Ranked in the highest (best) 20% of

Acute Trusts in 7 key findings • Staff Survey overall engagement score

remains the same from 2016 at 3.88 • Best Trust scores to date - positive results

overall inc. recommend place to work/receive treatment, H&WB, team working

What are we doing about them? • Promoting results across the Trust • Compare National results • A3 refresh on breakthrough objective • Corporate V&A project proposed

What’s gone well? • Response to staff survey 2017 increased

by 7% to 66% • Communications strategy for staff survey • Leadership Academy within facilities and

estates – 3 sessions now completed

What are the current challenges? • Medical engagement remains low • Violence, Harassment & Bullying

remains a concern

What are the Organisational Risks? • Operational pressures and

available capacity impact on staff availability to engage

• Dissonance in organisational values and staff experience

How are we managing them? • Divisional SDR focus on improving

engagement • Violence & Aggression A3 completed

and submitted. Proposed corporate project being considered.

Status is GREEN and STABLE

Peop

le

Staff Engagement

Score

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 12

M1 9

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M7

M8

M9

M10

M11

M12

Page 5: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

HSMR

True North

Owner : George Findlay

What are we trying to achieve? • Reduce the mortality rate for non-

elective patients, we want to reduce the number of potentially avoidable deaths.

• To be in top 20% of trusts as measured by Dr Foster

• To learn from all deaths occurring at WSHFT and improve end of life care

What is it important to know? • HSMR is 89 (12mths to January

2018) with observed 1858 vs 2087 expected deaths

• WSHFT HMSR is on the 16th percentile

• HSMR by site 83.4 SRH/94.1 WH • April’s crude mortality rate was

3.1%, higher than last year 2.82% and ytd 3.10% (limit set at 3.13%)

What’s gone well? • First report to public board took

place in January 17 • Consultant screening reviews have

reviewed 85% of deaths since inception

• Five mortality reviewers have been trained and started work in January 2018.

What are the current challenges? • Continuing to achieve the sepsis

bundle & antibiotic administration < 1 h over the winter

• Full implementation of the the Structured Judgement Mortality Case Note review (SMR) tool for targeted cases.

• Responding to the learning points emerging from the reviews e.g. earlier recognition of end of life care needs.

What are we doing about them? • Refreshing the business case that

supports mortality reviews • Increasing the workload of SJR’s

and starting panel reviews • Including End of Life Business case

in core division service priorities for 2018/19

What are the Organisational Risks? • Mortality reviews highlight

patients with delays in recognition and issues meeting end of life care needs.

• Achieving the required volume of SJ reviews

How are we managing them? • Detailed Dr Foster monthly reports

shared with divisions and oversight via Quality Board

• Mortality Steering Group implementing process for review of all deaths and additional oversight

Status is GREEN and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 9

M1 9

M2 9

M3 9

M4 9

M5 9

M6 9

M7 9

M8 9

M9 9

M10 9

M11 9

M12 9

M1 9

Qua

lity

Impr

ovem

ent

80

85

90

95Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio

source: Dr Foster

Page 6: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

True North April 2018

Owner : Nicola Ranger

What are we trying to achieve? • Reduce the number of patients coming

to harm during their stay in WSHFT, this can impact on wellbeing, length of stay and recommendation.

• Harm is measured monthly using the National Safety Thermometer.

What are the Organisational Risks? • Safety Thermometer is a once a month

prevalence measure and only measures 4 harms on that day.

• Falls • Pressure Damage • Catheter associated urinary tract

infections (CA-UTI’s) • Venous Thromboembolism . (VTE’s)

How are we managing them? • All harms reported via Datix system. • Oversight of all harms via

Triangulation Committee.

Status is RED and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 8

M1 12

M2 12

M3 12

M4 12

M5 12

M6 12

M7 12

M8 12

M9 12

M10 12

M11 12

M12 12

M1 12

Qua

lity

Impr

ovem

ent

90%

95%

100%

Apr-16 Aug-16 Dec-16 Apr-17 Aug-17 Dec-17 Apr-18

% P

atie

nts a

udite

d

Patient Safety Thermometer - % Patients with no new harms

d li d

What is it important to know? • 98.5% no new harms this month,

an improvement on March; only marginally below our 99% no new harm goal

.

What’s gone well? • Zero CAUTI’s reported on safety

thermometer for second successive month

• 5 of 6 VTE’s were deemed unavoidable.

What are the current challenges?

• Pressure Injuries; both community and hospital acquired continue to be the biggest contributor to harms on the safety thermometer.

What are we doing about them? • Local collaborative with community

colleagues to drive improvements together.

• Refreshed ward level A3s for driver wards

• Commencing weekly stand up meetings modelled on falls approach

Patient Safety Thermometer

Page 7: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Referral to Treatment

Times

A&E 4 Hours

Syst

ems a

nd P

artn

ersh

ips

True North

Owner : Pete Landstrom

What are we trying to achieve? • Reduce the number of patients

waiting an unacceptable time for elective treatments and appointments which leads to a poor patient experience.

• Metric is percentage of patient pathways completed in less than 18 weeks.

What is it important to know? • Achieved 84.3% <18 wks for April. • The Trust was non-compliant with

National target and below the 17/18 STF trajectory.

• 11 specialties were non compliant

What’s gone well? • Continued compliance for women

& children and core services divisions.

What are the current challenges? • Emergency demand requiring planned

reduction of elective inpatient activity in the first half of April, maintaining cancer and urgent elective throughput

• Increase in patients waiting over 18 weeks April (+423 patients)

• 10% increase in referrals April 2018 compared to same period 2017.

What are we doing about them? • Alongside the surgical plan for

ophthalmology the Trust has a sustainability plan for all specialties.

• Focus is on recovery but within funded capacity, and avoiding high cost premium solutions.

• Specific ophthalmology and orthopaedic review/ actions with executive and clinical leads

What are the Organisational Risks? • Increased volumes, reduced flow,

and non-delivery of activity volumes lead to a poor patient experience and waiting times.

• Failure to achieve National RTT 18wk constitutional target.

How are we managing them? • Activity and pathway management

programme in place tracking speciality level delivery .

• Weekly specialty level improvement and recovery review with DDOs and Divisions.

• Executive led ophthalmology recovery plans

• Orthopaedic productivity focus.

Status is RED and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 9

M1 12

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%RTT Incomplete pathways - % waiting less than 18 weeks

source: RTT Monthly Return

Page 8: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

A&E 4 Hour Waiting Times

A&E 4 Hours

Syst

ems a

nd P

artn

ersh

ips

True North

Owner : Pete Landstrom

What are we trying to achieve? • Demands in the urgent care

system lead to patient flow being compromised and poor patient experience.

• Metric is percentage of patients attending A&E seen within 4 hours - aiming to achieve 95% within 4 hours.

What is it important to know? • Over 65 emergency admissions

increased by 4.8% compared to April 2017, whilst over 85s increased by 9.5% in comparison to the preceding year.

What’s gone well? • Reduced occupancy rates 94.1%

compared with 95.7% March. • Reduction in MFFD per day to 136

average Trust wide Apr-18 compared with 159 March

• Formally Delayed Discharges 2.52% April compared to 2.99% Mar-17

What are the current challenges? • A&E attendances 1.7% increase

compared to April 2018, with 3.6% increase in patients aged over 65

What are we doing about them? • Focus has been on improving flow • A revised bed plan for 18/19 has

been developed by Medicine and Surgery Divisions.

What are the Organisational Risks? • Changes to system wide capacity

increases demand on hospital services and impacts on A&E delivery and potential failure to meet STF metrics.

• Highly reliant on temporary staffing with possible shortfalls impacting pressures on existing staff.

How are we managing them? • A&E 4hr position discussed through

Strategy Deployment Room and A&E Delivery Board.

• System wide Resilience Plan and performance to be monitored through A&E Delivery Board.

• Daily escalation and monitoring. • Ward discharge by midday project

focus

Status is RED and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 8

M1 9

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Apr-16 Aug-16 Dec-16 Apr-17 Aug-17 Dec-17 Apr-18

A&E - % Patients seen within 4 hours

source: A&E Monthly Return

Page 9: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Reduce the Number of

Falls

Breakthrough Objectives

Owner : George Findlay

What are we trying to achieve? • Reduce the number of

patients that fall in our Trust. This causes harm and has an impact on length of stay and our reputation.

• Falls are measured continuously via Datix.

What is it important to know? • There were 128 falls this month • 30% reduction goal achieved in

month for only the 4th time since project began

What’s gone well? • The surgical division has achieved 30%

reduction goal in month. • 10 driver wards achieved their monthly

reduction ambition • Middleton and Petworth are now

transferring to ‘watch’ wards

What are the current challenges? • Due to existing co-morbidities and

frailty the deconditioning of our patients remains a risk.

• Confusion in patients remains a dominant theme when a patient falls

What are we doing about them? • Work continuing to raise staff and

family awareness of deconditioning

• Review of delirium A3 to ensure full understanding of root causes and appropriate countermeasures

What are the Organisational Risks? • Focus on falls prevention could

result in other types of harm increasing.

How are we managing them? • All harms reported via Datix system.

Oversight of all harms via Triangulation Committee.

April 2018 Status is GREEN and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 9

M1 9

M2 12

M3 12

M4 12

M5 12

M6 9 M7

12

M8 12

M9 12

M10 12

M11 9

M12 12

M1 9

Qua

lity

Impr

ovem

ent

Target (30% reduction),

130 80

100120140160180200220240

Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18

Number of Falls

source: Dr Foster

Page 10: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Reduce MFFD Delays

A&E 4 Hours

Syst

ems a

nd P

artn

ersh

ips

Breakthrough Objectives

Owner : Pete Landstrom

What are we trying to achieve? • Reduce the number of patients in

our hospitals that are medically fit for discharge.

• MFFD patients in hospital beds can compromise patient flow, and impact on A&E wait and LOS.

• Metric is to reduce average patient days delayed by 50% .

What is it important to know? • MFFD average patient days

reduced to 981 in April(compared with 1301 March)

• Numbers of delayed pts varied between 101 on 6th April to 64 on 17th April.

What’s gone well? • DTOC patients reduced to 2.54%

from 2.99% Mar and 3.12% April 2017

• Reduction in MFFD per day to 136 average Trust wide Apr-18 compared with 159 March

• Trust occupancy 94.1% on average midnight Apr-17 (94.5% Worthing, 94.0% SRH)

What are the current challenges? • Average A&E demand greater than

same period 2017 (+1.7%)

What are we doing about them? • Agreed National Funding to support

increased resilience schemes for CWS including 25 additional community beds

• Senior Management ward buddies implemented to support Board Rounds and discharge flow including launch of ‘Early Bird’ patient discharges to lounge before 9am

What are the Organisational Risks? • Failure to reduce MFFD patients

occupying acute hospital beds adversely impacts delivery of A&E and elective targets.

• Patients own health and wellbeing can be compromised by staying in hospital longer than required.

How are we managing them? • Weekly MFFD multi agency

meetings on both acute sites as per national recommendations.

• Daily Board Round collection of delays and next step information by Discharge Team Daily SITREP reporting of formal DTOC patient numbers and reasons.

Status is RED and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 9

M1 9

Target, 750

80

580

1080

1580

42461 42522 42583 42644 42705 42767 42826 42887 42948 43009 43070 43132 43191

MFFD – Average Patient Days Delayed

source: MFFD Database

Page 11: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Reduce the amount of premium rate pay spend

Breakthrough Objectives

Owner : Karen Geoghegan

What are we trying to achieve? • Reduce the amount spent on

premium rate workforce solutions • Remain within the agency ceiling

of £14.9m set by NHS Improvement.

What is it important to know? • Premium pay expenditure is £0.4m

below target at the end of M1.

What’s gone well? • Maintained agency expenditure

reductions for 2017/18 with in month expenditure of £0.9m

What are the current challenges? • Improving cap compliance

particularly within medical placements.

• Delivery of elective waiting times without increasing reliance on WLI payments.

What are we doing about them? • Bilateral meetings to review key

areas of spend and exit plans for medical agency.

• Regular reporting and review, including approval of high cost and long-term placements.

• Establishment of Medical Workforce Action Group.

What are the Organisational Risks? • Premium rate pay expenditure is

unsustainable and Trust is unable to deliver I&E control total and therefore not able to access Sustainability and Transformation fund.

How are we managing them? • Weekly reporting of agency spend. • Targeted divisional focus through

strategy deployment. • Weekly scrutiny of agency spend

against overall ceiling trajectory plan.

Status is GREEN and STABLE

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 9

M1 8

Sust

aina

bilit

y

(5,000)

(3,000)

(1,000)

1,000

3,000

5,000

Apr-17 Jun-17 Aug-17 Oct-17 Dec-17 Feb-18 Apr-18

Agency Spend (£000s)

Page 12: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

A&E 4 Hours

Breakthrough Objectives

Owner : Denise Farmer

What are we trying to achieve? • Enable staff to have the

opportunities, tools and support to identify and make improvements in their area of work

What is it important to know? • Staff survey 2017 results show

improvement in Q4d up by 2% to 57%. Average for acute trusts 56%

• Results by Key Finding 1, 4 & 7 now available at divisional. Department, team and cost centre level

What’s gone well? • SDR process in divisions with

engagement as a driver metric • Roll out of improvement huddles in

non-clinical areas

What are the current challenges? • Understanding what’s

underpinning variation in monthly results

What are we doing about them? • Communicating staff survey results

through posters of top 5, bottom 5 findings

• Divisions analysing Q4d by cost centre – target under performing

• Refresh A3 supporting staff able to make improvements

What are the Organisational Risks? • Roll out of PFIS to clinical areas

risks disengaging some groups of staff

How are we managing them? • Continuing roll out of PFIS inc. women and

children’s division • Extending improvement huddles in non-clinical

areas – estates and facilities at St Richards

Status is GREEN and IMPROVING

Board Assurance Risk Score

Target 12

M1 9

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M7

M8

M9

M10

M11

M12

Peop

le

Staff are able to make

improvements

Page 13: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Capacity and

Capability

Insert project

Patient First Pa

tient

Q

ualit

y Im

prov

emen

t

Strategic Initiatives

Lean Projects

PFIS

Peop

le

What are we trying to achieve? How are we doing? What is important to know?

• Development of continuous improvement (Kaizen) Strategy that supports True North and Patient First objectives within the Trust to empower staff to solve problems and make improvements.

• Western Sussex ‘Patient First’ approach praised at the external NHS-I (Lean Conference) including John Toussant, Elaine Mead (NHS Highlands) in terms of approach and adoption of lean management system

• Lean management systems (PFIS) implemented across the whole organisation with full support and engagement from all teams, operationalised to the required standard to enable staff to make improvements

• PFIS Wave 8 at SRH has started for GDU, PreOp, Delivery, Tangmere, Ashling, Ford, Day Surgery, Goodwood Lounge

• Coaching and Mentoring continues in line with implementation plan & schedules with agreed Driver & Watch Metrics in place to align with SDR / Divisions

• Wave 7 Lunch & Learn – 14 June (Worthing)

• To ensure all staff have knowledge, skills to participate in Lean based improvement activities in helping to build a culture of continuous improvement in supporting True North and objectives of Patient First

• This months Yellow Belt training at SRH (day 2) has finished - with positive feedback from all our staff.

• SRH – Final YB Presentations set for 25 May 2018 at Kaizen Space for YB Project review & “Certification” process

• The Lean Improvement Projects are assigned to the Kaizen Team who provide coaching and mentoring, A3 approach and Problem Solving working within a collaborative team environment

• Kaizen Team currently providing coaching and support for the new “Putting Patients First for earlier discharges home” – with full Exec support and buy-in to the approach – with Weekly Project Huddles taking place (Exec, Medicine, Pharm, PFKO) as part of Leader Standard Work

Owner: Anil Mathew

Qua

lity

Impr

ovem

ent

443

37 W5 (4)

29

Page 14: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Sustainability and

Transformation Plan

Coastal Care

Patie

nt

Sust

aina

bilit

y Q

ualit

y Im

prov

emen

t

Strategic Initiatives

What are we trying to achieve? • Ensure the provision of high quality stroke

services meeting the National Stroke Strategy 2007 clinical standards

• Sussex-wide review of Stroke Services supported by the Sussex Collaborative Delivery Team and funded by the seven Sussex Clinical Commissioning Groups

How are we doing? • CWS CCG and WSHFT have

collaborated to implement the activity, bed capacity and financial analysis re-work recommended by Clinical Senate

What is important to know? • CCG & WSHFT are in process of

agreeing a joint recommendation which will to take into account the STP planning process

What are we trying to achieve? • Deliver a system wide plan to deliver

the 5 year forward view and close gaps in health and wellbeing, care and quality and finance across Sussex and East Surrey.

How are we doing? • The Trust continues to engage with

range of STP forum • Trust continues to support CCG in

developing Local Community Networks as outlined within ‘Inspiring Healthier Communities’

What is important to know? • New STP Chair appointed. Initial

meeting held with Chief Executive.

What are we trying to achieve? • A population based approach for Coastal

West Sussex delivered through increasing integration in order to improve standards, manage demand and make the system financially sustainable.

• Strategy includes Health and Social Care.

How are we doing? • Development of Local Community

Networks being led by CCG and receiving good engagement.

What is important to know? • CCG Considering future options and

models. Commitment to Place Based Plan remains.

Stroke Reconfiguration

Owner: Andy Gray

Page 15: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Outpatient Transformation

Time taken to process referrals

Patie

nt

Sust

aina

bilit

y Q

ualit

y Im

prov

emen

t

Strategic Initiatives

Demand and Capacity

Patient on-site waiting

times

What are we trying to achieve? • To improve every outpatient

appointment interaction • To improve patient experience

and simultaneously make the best use of Trust resources

What is important to know? • Programme priorities being delivered

predominantly to plan. Text reminder pilot demonstrated to be successful, implementation pending business case to demonstrate cost neutral.

• Docman well received by specialties; implementation of final specialties delayed pending system issues resolution

What is important to know? • 86.1% of referrals registered within 2 working

days year to date – target 80%. • Docman referral management system

implementation delayed due to unforeseen system issues. Plan to resolve

• Development work with NHS Digital ongoing to prepare for ‘Paper Switch Off’ by 1.10.18

What is important to know? • April 2018 recommend rate 96.7% - 0.3% below

compliance. • April 2018 response rate compliant at 7.5% and

compliant. • Analysis of patient feedback continuous to inform

future actions

What are we trying to achieve? • When patients come to our

Outpatients, they are waiting too long to be seen. Our objective is to reduce these waiting times - prioritising specialties with longer waits

Syst

ems a

nd

Part

ners

hips

What are we trying to achieve? • Once a referral is received,

manual processes are needed. Achieving best practice could reduce the time taken to manage and grade referrals by an average of 8 days

What are we trying to achieve? • This transformational programme

will support specialties to review clinic capacity . We anticipate this will reduce on-day delays and improve overall capacity to see more patients with the same resource.

What is important to know • April 2018 DNA rate 5.97% from 5.59% low in

November 2017 • DNA target 5.4% to achieve top 10% nationally. • SMS pilot demonstrated effectiveness to support

business case development. • Expected SMS go-live Q1 2018/19, pending

approval

Owner: George Findlay

Page 16: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Workforce Transformation

Strategic Initiatives

Peop

le

Owner: Denise Farmer

What are we trying to achieve? • To develop and maintain a robust

medical workforce, including creation of new and/or alternate roles to mitigate recruitment challenges and reduce reliance on agency

• Market manage agencies to ensure consistency and quality of supply at cost-effective rates, and to work towards full cap compliance

• To maximise opportunities from substantive workforce, including improved recruitment, retention and staff management

What is important to know? • Staff vacancies remain around 9%,

with a slightly improved turnover as we move into Q4

• Challenges from higher rates offered by neighbouring Trusts continues to impact on our ability to fill temporary shifts

• Continued roll-out of HR IT systems will provide increased visibility on job planning, junior doctor rostering and annual leave,

• Full Safe Care compliance is now forecast for 1st April 2018

How are we doing? • Nursing spend continues to decrease,

with agency reliance now at lowest levels for the past year. Cap compliance fluctuates around 50% as we balance fill of escalation shifts during winter pressure with notice offered to above-cap agencies

• Medical workforce spend remains against run-rate in 2017, with continued difficulties in recruitment into medical workforce vacancies; part mitigation achieved through development of alternate roles

Page 17: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Patie

nt

Corporate Projects

Owner: Karen Geoghegan

What are we trying to achieve? • Relocate Worthing

Ophthalmology to Southlands • Provide capacity to achieve 18

week RTT and meet anticipated future demand

• Improve patient experience by redesigning patient pathways

• Improve Theatre Productivity (18/19 Corporate Project)

• Evidence benefit realisation/lessons learnt from Post Project Evaluation Delivery

What is important to know? • Go live – Tuesday 27th June. • Car parking phased plan agreed. • Theatres achieved IC approval. • Clinics and lists now booked. • OOH emergency pathways need to

be formally agreed. • Potential for OOH emergencies to go

to Susssex Eye in Brighton long term – under discussion

• Southlands Ophthalmology now in ‘business as usual’ status.

• PPE Launch completed. Data gathering progressing.

• Ophthalmology in scope for Theatre Productivity Corporate Projects.. Baselines agreed. Clinical workshops scheduled for 21.6.

• Improvement Plan for Trust Wide/Specialty specific progressing.

Key Risks: • Car parking solution insufficient for

staff needs at present. • OOH emergency pathways –

significant increase in walk in activity and OOH emergencies still not in place with weekend theatre access – discussions ongoing with BSUH

Mitigations: • Operational programme team in place to

oversee service changes and manage risk. • Equipment costs being tightly managed. • Joint work with Estates to identify number

of car parking spaces required –potentially 60-70 spaces needed – now identified as part of 17/18 capital plan – to be completed by Dec 17.

Target Date Workstream Progress

Spring 2017 Building programme

Complete

Dec 16 Staff consultation Complete

Upon opening Job Planning On track

Upon opening Recruitment & training plan ongoing

Feb 17 Development of new patient pathways - to be tested

Complete

Q4 16/17 Service Transition Plan Complete

ongoing Equipment plan & training Complete

Q1 17/18 Operational Policy complete

27.03/17 Evolve go live complete

Sept 17 OOH emergency theatre on call in place

On track

May/June PPE Launch & Reporting On Track

Q2/Q3 Theatre Productivity Optimisation On Track

Owner: Pete Landstrom

Target 9

M1 9

M2 2

M3 2

M4 2

M5 6

M6 6

M7 6

M8 6

M9 6

M10 6

West Sussex Eye Care @ Southlands

Page 18: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Corporate Projects

CWS MSK Integrated

Service

What are we trying to achieve? Improved patient outcomes, shorten waiting times & control health economy costs by: • Redesigning MSK Pathways for

elective and outpatient care • Lead on delivering an integrated

service collaboratively with SCFT & 3rd parties.

Syst

ems a

nd

Part

ners

hips

Owner: Marianne Griffiths

What is important to know? • Discussions relating to integrated

models of care, collaboration and progressing MSK are ongoing. These will continue in the context of the Aligned Incentive Contract.

• The upgrade of the Physiotherapy Department in Worthing Hospital to support the MSK redesign plan is complete.

Key Risks: • Significant loss of staff engagement

and momentum due to ongoing delays in start of the full MSK redesign programme

• The central MSK programme team within WSHFT has no staff in post following the promotion of the Project Manager within SCFT.

Mitigations: • Dialogue between SCFT and WSHT at

operational and executive level to Integrate care on several programmes of work and ensure priorities are aligned.

Junior Doctor Contract Junior Doctor Contract

Target 8

M1 20

M2 20

M3 20

M4 20

M5 20

M6 20

M7 20

M8 20

M9 20

M10 20

M11 20

M12 20

Target Date Action CompletenessJul-16 Develop detailed plans for triage and treatment service 100%Jul-16 Present work to date to CCG 100%

Aug-16 Develop Early Implementation and Change Control process 100%Aug-16 Develop Locality Plan and Iitemise Service Changes 100%Aug-16 Response from CCG to contract negotiation Still awaitingDec-16 Partnership MOU and NDA in place 100%Feb-17 Introduce GP Pilot and Triage and Treatment Service 100%Feb-17 Clinical Information System implementation commenced Investment TBDApr-17 Colocated MDT hubs in place at Worthing and Pulborough Investment TBDMay-17 Develop detailed plans for specialist MDT pathways not startedJun-17 Self management service commences (subject to contract) not startedOct-17 Bognor and Southlands Hubs and all MDTs fully operational not started

MSK Programme High level Milestones - Updated Sept 2017

Page 19: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Corporate Projects

Patie

nt

Clinical Portal

Patie

nt

Clinical Document

Management Portal

Key Risks: • Project is under resourced across all teams,

with a lack of the necessary skill mix to achieve results in a timely manner to meet project timescales.

• Operational Pressures and in some areas a resistance to change, may mean that agreed project timescales will not be met.

Mitigations: • Work is prioritised and completed

within the team’s capacity. In addition, BAU teams are being upskilled to meet requirements.

• Investigate areas with less operational pressures. Liaison with services to minimise the resistance. Where reluctance persists, to be escalated to the Project Board.

What are we trying to achieve? • All patient records to be

paperlight at WSHFT by 2020

Owner: Ian Arbuthnot

Target 9

M1 9

M2 9

M3 9

M4 9

M5 9

M6 9

M7 9

M8 9

M9 9

M10 9

M11 9

M12 9

What is important to know? 1. Owing to additional requirements

being, the planned date for the pilot roll-out to Paediatric IP wards was not met. Items are being worked through with the project team and a new date will be identified. Other services have been slotted into the space to keep the project on track.

2. Statistics since go live to end April 2018:

• 4,065 staff trained to date • 1,992 active system users • 52,862 completed e-Forms to

date.

Roll-Out

Timeframes Action Progress

Completed

Apr 18 Roll-out to Upper GI / General Surgery – all sites

May 18

Roll-out to Colorectal OP – all sites

Completed

May - June Roll-out to Gastro / Endoscopy Op – all

sites

In progress - On track

Page 20: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Corporate Projects

Patie

nt

Target 6

M1 6

M2 6

M3 6

M4 6

M5 8

M6 8

M7 6

M8 6

M9 6

M10 6

How are we doing? • Review is complete – 16 recommendations • Report presented to Trust Board, TEC, joint

surgical governance meetings and physicians meeting.

• Colorectal team now meeting weekly. • Joint polyp MDT commenced January 2018. • RMOs started in August to help under pin

junior doctor shortages at WG. Full review of jnr dr workforce to take place Q4 17/18.

• 2 emergency consultant surgeons now appointed at WG.

• Improved data quality and project level KPI dashboards progressing as part of the 1819 Surgery Improvement Strategy

• Project Resource Plan progressing to resource a the increase in scope for surgery delivery in 1819

What are we trying to achieve? • Service review to ensure we are

operating emergency and urgent surgery across the St Richard’s and Worthing sites in the most effective way.

What is important to know? • No major reconfiguration required at this

time – not evidenced via the review. • Very clear view articulated via the listening

exercise – all of these viewed represented in the recommendations.

• Some recommendations already implemented and others merging to reduce recommendations and manage project more effectively.

• 2 outstanding recommendations relating to centralisation agenda for Breast and Urology part of the 1819 Surgery Improvement Strategy Corporate Project

Owner: George Findlay

Key Risks: • Risk of lack of engagement by staff. • Data analysis must be robust – tight

timeframe to complete this work. • Risk outcome may not be accepted by

surgeons who feel the review has take too long and not addressed key issues.

• Some concerns around overnight workload for RMOs and Jnr Drs. Subject to full review by DDO/CoS.

Mitigations: • Communication and engagement

plans in place to communicate outcome – complete.

• Project governance further supported by PMO.

• Key recommendations to try and address concerns of clinicians – some like cross site working may not be popular but deemed necessary for cross collegiate working to improve .

Acute Surgical Review

Page 21: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Owner: Pete Landstrom

What are we trying to achieve? • Install a new laboratory information

management system (Winpath) and order comms system (Cyberlab) as part of the Abbott pathology managed equipment service which will support full service integration and delivery of the process and workforce efficiencies associated with the planned automated hot and cold site lab configuration for WSHFT.

How are we doing? • Programme went fully live on Monday

14th May 2018. • There have been some infrastructure

related issues which caused a 24 hour outage. We are awaiting RCA before passing from project to BAU.

What is important to know? • The go-live was achieved on minimal spend

when compared to similar LIMS implementations. (£200K cf £12M (Viapath))

Key Risks: • There is a risk that until the RCA of

the system outage is identified a similar outage might occur.

Pathology LIMS

Corporate Projects

Patie

nt

Mitigations: • Ongoing investigations by the supplier

utilising the manufacturers of the various software elements of the solution are underway.

Page 22: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Title Month 01 (April), 2018/19 Monthly Quality Report

Responsible Executive Director Dr George Findlay (Chief Medical Officer) and Nicola Ranger (Chief Nurse)

Prepared by Jo Habben (Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety)

Status Disclosable

Summary of Proposal Not applicable

Implications for Quality of Care Describes performance against quality outcome KPIs, including safety, infection control, experience, effectiveness and mortality.

Link to Strategic Objectives/Board Assurance Framework This report pulls together key national, regional and local quality indicators relating to quality and safety providing assurance for the Board and (if necessary) highlighting issues.

Financial Implications Describes KPIs that have potential financial impact (e.g. CQUIN.)

Human Resource Implications Describes KPIs linked to workforce.

Recommendation The Board is asked to: Note the contents of this report.

Communication and Consultation Not applicable

Appendices Appendix 1: Quality Scorecard Appendix 2: Ward Staffing Scorecard

To: Trust Executive Board/Quality Board Date of Meeting: May 2018

Agenda Item: 5.1

Page 23: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

1 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 This report brings together key national, regional and local indicators relating to quality, performance

and safety. The purpose of the report is to bring to the attention of the Trust Board quality

performance within Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation Trust (WSHFT).

1.2 The paper describes performance on an exceptional basis determined by RAG (red/amber/green)

ratings based on national, regional or local targets.

2 2018/19 REFRESH

2.1 There has been a refresh of the Monthly Quality Report for 2018/19 to reflect the key quality

objectives for the next year aligned to Patient First and our True North objective1. The report follows

the same format as previously using the same suite of metrics, with revised targets using similar logic

in the interim to that applied for 2017/18:-

• If 2017/18 performance exceeded target, then 2017/18 actuals used as 2018/19 target

• If 2017/18 performance did not meet target then 2017/18 target remains the same for 2018/19

• If there is a national or set target then that will continue as the measure

• Any metrics with no target set continue as before

2.1.2 The Quality Scorecard for 2018/19 incorporates the following changes:

• Site view

New indicators:

a) E59-Rate of discharges by Midday under section ‘Increase discharge effectiveness’ b) E55-Normal delivery rate under section ‘To improve maternity care by encouraging natural

childbirth’ c) E58-Induction of labour under same as b)

• Removal of some indicators as advised

• Some minor re-arranging of metrics and changes to metric definitions

3 KEY QUALITY OBJECTIVES

3.1 Scorecard Definitions

3.1.1 The full Clinical Quality Scorecard is presented as Appendix 1. Figures are in-month figures (e.g. the

number of falls reported in April) unless otherwise stated. The scorecard shows 13 months to allow

trends to be identified, although some data items are reported retrospectively. Year to date

1 Patient First is our long term approach to transforming services. ‘True North’ is the one constant towards which the four strategic themes for the organisation – sustainability, people, quality improvement and Systems & partnerships – should lead.

Page 24: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

2 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

actuals/targets are based on financial years unless otherwise stated (standardised mortality ratios are

recorded as 12 month positions for example). A subset of the key measures from the report is

presented at 3.3. These currently remain the same sub-set as last year and will be refreshed when

the new scorecard is established.

3.1.2 Exception reports are included under the relevant section of this report (Effectiveness, Safety and

Patient Experience).

3.1.3 Although the scorecard reflects 13 months of data, only the current financial year and year to date

values are RAG rated - with the exception of those metrics reported in arrears where the most recent

data-point of last year is RAG rated.

3.2 Domain scores

3.2.1 The score is an overall indication of the performance in relation to each of the domains -

Effectiveness, Safety and Patient Experience. The score is calculated as follows: Each RAG rated

indicator for a month is scored: red scores 1, amber scores 2, green scores 3. These scores are then

totalled and divided by the total number of indicators with RAG ratings to give a score for the domain

as a whole between 1 and 3. This final score can then itself be RAG rated with >2.5 giving an overall

green, 1.5 to 2.5 amber and <1.5 an overall red score for the domain as a whole. For example if a

domain had two greens and a red the calculation would be as follows:

3 (green) + 3 (green) + 1 (red) = 7

7 / 3 (i.e. the total number of metrics) = 2.33 i.e. amber overall.

3.2.2 Domain scores are calculated based on the year to date RAG ratings for each metric. Previous

months are retrospectively updated to take account of any measures reported in arrears, and should

additional metrics be added within the domain. As with any aggregate indicator, it remains essential

that the Board retains sight of the individual elements as well as the domain score as a whole.

Page 25: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

3 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

3.3 Overview of Key Quality Objectives

3.3.1 The following table shows performance against key quality objectives.

Indicator Feb 2018

March 2018

April 2018 2018/19 to date

2018/19 Target /

limit Effectiveness Domain Score 2.30 2.47 1.90 2.25

Safety Domain Score 2.31 2.07 2.30 2.30

Experience Domain Score 2.48 2.32 2.48 2.48

E01 Trust crude mortality rate (non-elective) 3.86% 3.52% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10%

E03 Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio for top 56 diagnoses (Dr Foster, based on rolling 12 months)

Data from

January

2018

89.0 100

S06 Number of Serious Incidents Requiring Investigation (number reported in month)

3 2 8 8 53

S14 Numbers of hospital attributable MRSA 1 0 0 0 0

S28 Numbers of hospital C. diff where a lapse in the quality of care was noted

2 2 0 0 16

X38 The Friends and Family Test: Percentage Recommending Inpatients

97.0% 96.3% 97.2% 97.2% 97%

X39 The Friends and Family Test: Percentage Recommending A&E

85.5% 87.4% 91.7% 91.7% 93%

X13 Mixed Sex Accommodation breaches (number of breaches)

0 0 0 0 0

X18 Number of complaints 28 38 26 26 456

Page 26: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

4 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

4 EFFECTIVENESS

4. 1 Crude Trust Mortality

4.1.1 Due to the low level of mortality experienced in elective care, the Trust measures mortality in relation

to non-elective activity using the previous year as a benchmark.

4.1.2 Crude non-elective mortality decreased from 3.52% in March to 3.10% in April, this is higher than the

equivalent month in 2018 (2.82%). However provisional data from the Office for National Statistics

shows that weekly death rates for England and Wales have been higher throughout quarter 4 when

compared with the weekly averages for the preceding 5 years. Further analysis of the national picture

is awaited. Screening data from the ‘Learning from Deaths’ process will also be examined carefully to

check there has been no increase in reported problems.

4.1.3 The number of non-elective patients (Crude) who died in April was 184 (3.10%) from 5939

discharges. Worthing and Southlands reported 91 deaths of 3070 discharges (2.96%) and St

Richards Hospital reported 93 deaths of 2869 discharges (3.24%). The year to date mortality rate is

3.10% and the rolling 12 month mortality rate is 3.13%.

4.2 Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)

4.2.1 There is a delay in data being available in Dr Foster tools to allow for coding and processing by the

Health and Social Care Information Centre and Dr Foster. The most recent data available is January

2018.

4.2.2 The Trust’s HSMR for the twelve months to January 2018 is 89.0 (1858 deaths against expected

2087) 100 is the level predicted by the Dr Foster model using the September 2017 benchmark.

4.2.3 The twelve month HSMR to January 2018 split by site continues to be lower for St Richard’s 83.4 (832

deaths against expected 998) than for Worthing and Southlands 94.1 (1027 deaths against expected

1091). The difference is marginally lower for SRH than the previous month and remains well within

acceptable variation limits, with both sites remaining below 100.

4.2.4 E10. 30 day mortality rate following hip fracture – remains relatively static and in January 2018 was

reported at 7.4% against target of 5.70% (YTD actual 7.39%).

4.2.6 A further report is available to clinical leaders in the Trust showing the clinical diagnostic areas with

high actual versus expected mortality and any mortality CuSum alerts.

4.2.7 The Trust has set the goal of achieving a position within the top 20% of Trusts as measured by

HSMR. For the twelve months to January 2018 performance using this measure continues to place

us just within the top 20% of Trusts on the 19th centile.

Page 27: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

5 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

4.3 Summary Hospital-Level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) 4.3.1 The latest data made available by the Health and Social Care Information Centre is for the period to

August 2017. The Trust value remains at 0.95 (where 1.00 is the national average), with the Trust

banded as “as expected”.

4.4 Exception Reports Relating to Effectiveness

4.4.1 E13. C-Section rate- the Trust Caesarean Section rate from March to April shows an improving

trajectory decrease to 26.4% against a target of 27.8%. Each case where a woman has a caesarean

delivery undergoes a review process to look for learning opportunities. No systemic causes or trends

have been identified and practice is very much in line with national recommendations for safe practice

and NICE guidance. Increasing normal birth continues to be an area of focus for the division and

rates are closely monitored via monthly divisional performance reviews.

4.4.2 E58. Induction of labour (new indicator). April’s data reports 37.9% against a target of 29.4%.

4.4.3 E59. Rate of discharges by midday (new indicator). April’s data reports 12.8% against a target of

45%. Summary report to be provided in M2.

4.4.4 E47. % of patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy within one hour (new indicator). April’s data

reports 74.55% against a target of 90%.

4.4.3 E42. Night time moves in patients with a diagnosis of dementia. In April, 45 patients with a diagnosis

of dementia were moved at night (between 23:00-07:00hrs), this is a decrease (improvement) from

March when a total of 59 patients were moved at night.

4.4.4 The dementia team continues to monitor and record/audit the moves and the Kaizen work stream is

not only focused on patients with a diagnosis of dementia but also any patient that is moved at night.

Ongoing improvement work continues with representation from the Kaizen team, matrons, dementia

matron, the site team and the clinical lead for the emergency floors.

5 SAFETY

5.1 Central Alert System (CAS) Safety Alerts

5.1.1 There are no outstanding alerts for the Trust up to April 2018.

Page 28: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

6 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

5.2 Serious Incidents Requiring Investigation (SIRIs)

5.2.1 There were 8 reported incidents categorised as a Serious Incident (SI) requiring investigation in April.

Four patients fell and sustained a fractured neck of femur requiring further surgery. In addition, there

were two unexpected deaths, one treatment delay leading to significant harm, and one ‘Never Event’

involving the wrong siting of an anaesthetic block in theatre (low harm). A detailed serious incident

report is provided to the committee section of the Trust board. The board should note there can be

slight variation in the month-by-month numbers between the SI report and the number of significant

incidents – this is because incidents are attributed to the month in which they occur whereas the SI

data is based on the month in which the SI was reported externally.

5.2.2 Any incidents that are reported as causing significant harm (moderate, severe or resulting in the death

of a patient) are notified immediately to the senior team in the Trust including the chief nurse and the

chief medical officer with at least weekly updates on progress. In April 18 incidents were reported,

against a yearly target of 153.

5.2.3 S09. Moderate/severe incidents involving drug/prescribing errors- April’s data has noted a continuum

of reporting, making a YTD total of 1 reported incident against an annual target of 5.

5.2.4 S44. Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 2% reduction in overall antibiotic consumption.

April’s data reports 15.8% against a target of 15%.

5.2.5 On a monthly basis there is triangulation of information arising out of complaints, claims, incidents and

inquests to identify any areas of learning or for focus. The newly revised Triangulation Committee

continues to focus on how we share learning across the organisation, with a detailed ‘Deep Dive’

focus on an incident(s) (where the learning for the organisation is significant) being discussed at each

meeting.

5.3 Infection control

5.3.1 There were 0 cases of Clostridium difficile reported in April where there was a noted lapse in care

attributable to the Trust.

5.3.2 The allocated Trust target limit for 2017/18 (C/Diff) is set at 39 2 (unchanged from last year). Incidence

in April was 0 cases per 100,000 bed days against the national average for 2015/16 of 14.9 cases per

100,000 bed days3.

2 NHSI (2017) Clostridium difficile infection objectives for NHS organisations in 2017/18 and guidance on sanction implementation. Page 5 3 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/clostridium-difficile-infection-annual-data.

Page 29: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

7 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

5.3.3 S16. Number of reportable MSSA bacteremia cases in April has been reported as a total of 10, none

of these cases were attributable to the organisation.

5.4 Falls

5.4.1 In April, inpatient falls decreased from a total of 160 reported in March, to 128 reported in April, and of

these 38 resulted in harm equalling the monthly target threshold of 38. From the overall monthly total

of 128, 55 falls were noted at Worthing Hospital and 73 were recorded at St Richards Hospital.

5.4.2 There were 7 falls resulting in a moderate degree of harm to patients. Four of these incidents resulted

in a patient injury of a neck of femur fracture, and were reported as Serious Incidents as outlined in

5.2.1.

5.4.3 The number of falls in April equates to 4.6 per 1,000 bed days against a national figure of 6.63.4 Of

the 38 falls reported as resulting in harm in February, those causing significant harm (moderate,

severe harm/death) equate to 0 per 1000 bed days against the national figure of 0.19.

5.4.4 Patient frailty (with patients over 85 years of age) due to existing co-morbidities and the

deconditioning of elderly patients remains a risk. Confusion in patients remains a dominant theme

when reviewing the circumstances of how the patient came to fall, therefore a focus on recognition a

of delirium and management needs to remain high. There remain a high number of patients falling

unwitnessed in the bays, a renewed focus on Baywatch and bay working is required within all

divisions. The focus of Baywatch and what this means will be revisited with “Baywatch the sequel”

staff promotional video. In addition “What is a meaningful activity and how can I do it?” educational

updates are to be included in a fundamentals of care session for new health care assistants.

5.5 Tissue Viability

5.5.1 Changes to the way the Trust is required to report pressure ulcers meant that more grade 2 and

grade 3 ulcers were reported in 2015/16 than in previous years. This method of reporting changed

from October 2016 and grade 3 or greater damage will not be routinely reported as a Serious Incident

unless it meets the national threshold for Serious Incident (NHSE SI Framework 2015) reporting.

Internal scrutiny of cases continues exactly as before with robust follow through of actions.

5.5.2 During April the Trust reported at total of 27 incidents of pressure damage both equal to and greater

than European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Group (EPUAP) category 2- a decrease in reporting from

Marchs data of 37. Of these reported cases- there were 18 category 2 hospital acquired pressure

ulcers, 5 suspected deep tissue injuries (SDTI), 1 category 3 hospital acquired pressure ulcer and 3

unstageable injuries. Of the overall total of 27, 19 of these incidents occurred at the Worthing Site.

4 Royal College of Physicians. National Audit of Inpatient Falls: audit report 2015. London: RCP, 2015.

Page 30: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

8 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

5.5.3 The incidence of pressure ulcers, category 2 and above including those developing within 72 hours

after admission per 1000 bed days in March was 0.9, against a national rate of 0.9 (as per the Safety

Thermometer data).

5.5.4 There were 156 patients admitted to the Trust from the community with existing pressure damage, the

majority being from the patient’s own home (122).

5.5.5 During April a follow up Pressure Injury workshop was held where the wards presented and shared

their successes and identified learning to reduce the incidences of hospital acquired pressure injuries.

It was agreed that further workshops to coincide with falls reduction initiatives would be scheduled

quarterly going forward. All Divisions have been provided with information (including the order code)

for a static pressure redistribution cushion that is appropriate for use by all our patients including

patients assessed as high risk. The redesigned algorithm outlining the de-escalation process of

alternating pressure redistribution mattresses has been circulated to the divisions and is now being

discussed at daily safety huddles. In addition, the tissue viability team has designed a visual poster re

the classification of moisture versus pressure injuries which have been circulated to the clinical areas

for reference.

5.6 NHS Patient Safety Thermometer

5.6.1 The NHS Patient Safety Thermometer is used across all relevant acute wards. This tool looks at point

prevalence of four key harms - falls, pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and deep vein thrombosis

(DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in all patients on a specific day in the month. A dashboard is

available to each ward showing Trust-wide and ward-level data for each individual harm as well as the

harm-free care score. These numbers are also shared via the new ward screens.

5.6.2 S02. The harm-free care score for the Trust in April was 96.0%- against the annual target of 95.7%.

5.6.3 The Safety Thermometer includes harms suffered by the patient in healthcare settings prior to

admission. The actual number of patients who suffered no new harm during their inpatient stay at

WSHFT (indicator S03) in April was 98.5% against a national average of 97.8% and close to

achieving the challenging internal target of 99% set by the organisation.

5.6.4 S11. Compliance with VTE assessment of patients was 94.1% against a target of 95%.

5.6.5 National data relating to the NHS safety thermometer is available here: http://www.safetythermometer.nhs

Page 31: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

9 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

6 PATIENT EXPERIENCE

6.3 PALS and Complaints

6.3.1 During April the Trust received 26 complaints, the top five themes (in order) being noted as clinical

treatment, admissions/transfer/discharge, date for appointment, patient privacy and dignity and end of

life care.

6.3.2 The top five themes for PALS concerns trust wide during April 2018 (in order) are noted as date for

appointment, communication (oral), communication (written), clinical treatment and date of admission.

6.3.3 X21. Complaints about nursing were reported as 5 against an annual target of 39.

6.3.4 Divisions continue to embed a more proactive response to new complaints to try to facilitate resolution quickly for

patients and families. The Executive team set a target of working towards achieving 60% of complaints to be

closed within 25 days each month. 52% of formal complaints were resolved within 25 working days at the end of

March 2018 (previously 11.8% in at the end of June 2017).

6.3.5 The Quarterly Complaints Report provides an in-depth analysis of trends and lessons learned. This is

reviewed by the Patient Experience and Feedback Committee and is presented to the Trust Board.

6.4 Friends and Family Test (FFT)

6.4.1 Patients who access hospital services are asked whether they would recommend WSHFT to their

friends or family if they needed similar treatment. Patients who access inpatient, outpatient, day-case,

A&E and maternity are all offered the opportunity to respond to the question.

6.4.2 Immediate feedback is provided to wards and departments on a continuous basis to ensure staff can

address problems or get positive feedback as quickly as possible. In addition to this, a dashboard is

available giving wards access to their individual scores and a poster printed with ward performance to

display to the public. Ward ‘recommend’ rates are shown on the screens installed on wards.

6.4.3 Friends and Family Test Response Rates:

6.4.4 Work continues to improve response rates towards a target this year of 40% (with an interim target for

A&E of 23% YTD actual 10.4%). The average response rate in 2017/18 for NHS acute trusts was

12.7%. Currently, response rates for Inpatients and A&E for April are below the Trust target.

Page 32: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

10 Western Sussex Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust – Quality Report for Trust Board

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety

6.4.5 While acknowledging work still to be done in achieving better response rates particularly in A&E, the

proportion of patients who would have recommended our services to friends and family in April

compares favourably with national median benchmark and with the exception of A&E also against our

internal target as per the table below:

6.4.6

Percentage recommending WSHFT in April (plus YTD)

Target

Inpatient care 97.2% (97.2%) 97%

A&E 91.7% (91.7%) 93%

Maternity: Delivery care 97.5% (97.5%) 97%

Outpatient care 96.7% (96.7%) 97%

Maternity: Antenatal care 97.4% (97.4%) 97%

Maternity: Postnatal ward 97.5% (97.5%) 97%

Maternity: Postnatal community care

100% (100%) 97%

6.4.7 X39. Of note, this is the first time A&E has exceeded 90% likely to recommend; reflecting improved waiting

times in April.

7 RECOMMENDATION

7.3.1 The Board is asked to note the contents of this report.

Jo Habben Head of Clinical Governance and Patient Safety 21st May 2018.

Page 33: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - WSHFT Page 1 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

wshft APRIL 2018MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR YTD Actual YTD Target Target Trend

EFFECTIVENESSEffectiveness domain score 2.41 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.48 2.46 2.36 2.29 2.22 2.30 2.47 1.90 2.25

Trust-wide mortality

E01 Trust crude mortality rate (non-elective) 2.82% 2.56% 2.64% 2.60% 2.65% 3.15% 3.06% 3.26% 4.25% 3.86% 3.52% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10%

E02 Crude mortality rate (non-elective): 12 month rolling 3.11% 3.11% 3.09% 3.09% 3.09% 3.07% 3.06% 3.05% 3.07% 3.10% 3.11% 3.13% 3.13% 3.11% 3.11%

E03 Trust Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) (rollin 12M) 87.4 89.0 88.8 88.4 88.7 88.2 88.5 88.1 89.0 89.0 100 100

E04 Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) (rolling 12M) 0.95 1 1

E45 % of Part 1 inpatient deaths reviewed 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100%

Improve mortality in specific conditions

E47 % patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy within one hour *NEW* 75.8% 77.4% 78.6% 85.5% 87.1% 84.0% 81.8% 80.4% 74.4% 77.6% 77.8% 74.55% 74.55% 90% 90%

Reduce mortality following hip fracture

E09 SMR for hip fracture (all diagnoses/procedures) (rolling 12M) 87.0 97.2 101.3 95.7 92.2 89.4 93.8 88.5 95.0 95.0 100 100

E10 30 day mortality rate following hip fracture (rolling 12M) 6.5% 6.8% 7.2% 7.3% 7.1% 7.8% 7.7% 6.8% 7.4% 7.39% 5.70% 5.70%

Increase discharge effectiveness

E59 Rate of discharges by Midday 14.2% 14.5% 14.1% 13.1% 13.1% 13.0% 14.2% 13.9% 14.8% 13.7% 14.5% 12.8% 12.8% 45% 45%

Reduce the rate of readmission following discharge from the Trust

E11 Emergency readmissions within 30 days % 14.7% 13.5% 14.7% 13.4% 13.8% 14.4% 14.0% 13.6% 13.2% 14.4% 13.8% 14.13% 14.13% 13% 13%

To improve maternity care by encouraging natural childbirth

E13 C-Section Rate 27.0% 30.1% 22.8% 27.0% 29.4% 27.1% 28.8% 33.0% 29.4% 32.1% 31.3% 26.40% 26.40% 27.80% 27.8%

E15 % Deliveries complicated by post-partum haemorrhage 0.9% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 1.1% 0.2% 0.20% 0.20% 1% 1%

E17 Admission of term babies to neonatal care 3.7% 4.0% 3.4% 3.7% 2.5% 3.5% 2.6% 3.8% 2.1% 3.8% 3.1% 4.30% 4.30% 10% 10%

E55 Normal delivery rate 36.3% 35.0% 37.8% 33.9% 37.4% 36.5% 35.5% 30.5% 30.8% 31.0% 28.5% 30.8% 30.8% NA NA

E58 Induction of labour 35.4% 31.0% 35.9% 34.3% 28.9% 36.5% 34.5% 41.8% 36.7% 34.1% 38.8% 37.90% 37.90% 29.4% 29.4%

Caring for the elderly patient

E18 % Emergency admissions staying over 72h screened for dementia 93.4% 91.0% 90.6% 91.8% 82.9% 94.2% 96.9% 87.3% 93.8% 93.0% 88.9% 91.32% 91.32% 90% 90%

E39 Ward moves for patients flagged with dementia 235 180 203 180 110 174 163 217 236 193 182 207 207 188 2257

E42 Night-time ward moves for patients flagged with dementia : Total 43 46 38 22 23 44 44 66 42 44 59 45 45 42 500

E42 Night-time ward moves for patients flagged with dementia : % Total excluding Emergency Floor 26.7% 20.8% 18.8% 9.5% 25.0% 30.8% 25.0% 20.0% 26.0% 42.7% 23.7% 15.6% 15.6% NA NA

Stroke care

E26 % CT scans undertaken within 12 hours 94.6% 95.5% 95.9% 96.9% 95.1% 90.2% 97.6% 93.6% 91.9% 97.9% 95.9% - 95% 95%

E27 % Stroke thrombolysis within 60 minutes of hospital arrival 62.5% 71.4% 69.2% 100.0% 71.4% 81.8% 77.8% 88.9% 66.7% 40.0% 50.0% - 95% 95%

E28 % Swallow screen for stroke patients within 4 hours of admission 86.9% 86.4% 71.1% 84.4% 87.9% 83.3% 87.8% 71.8% 66.2% 85.4% 94.0% - 95% 95%

E29 % of stroke patients admitted to stroke unit within 4 hours of admission 82.0% 78.8% 70.1% 70.3% 76.8% 74.4% 75.0% 72.3% 50.0% 79.2% 74.0% - 90% 90%

E30 % high risk TIA patients seen within 24 hours 20.0% 50.0% 33.3% 5.0% 8.3% 15.4% 7.7% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 16.7% - 60% 60%

Ensure active engagement with research

E23 Patients recruited with CRN portfolio 147 147 233 2800

Data Quality

E37 % inpatients with electronic discharge summaries produced 93.9% 93.3% 94.6% 93.2% 92.7% 93.4% 92.6% 91.5% 92.2% 92.7% 92.0% 92.8% 92.8% 94.2% 94.2%

0.95

QUALITY SCORECARD - WSHFT

0.95

Page 34: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - WSHFT Page 2 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

wshft APRIL 2018MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR YTD Actual YTD Target Target Trend

QUALITY SCORECARD - WSHFTMental Health Care *NEW*

E54 Reduced A&E vists for a cohort of frequent attenders who would benefit from MH interventions 37 46 27 36 34 26 31 18 17 22 28 27 27 41 488

SAFETYSafety domain score 2.35 2.39 2.39 2.06 2.19 2.06 2.22 2.14 2.19 2.31 2.07 2.30 2.30

Safer staffing

S36 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - registered nurses/ midwives (day shifts) 97.1% 97.6% 96.2% 94.2% 94.0% 91.7% 94.3% 94.1% 95.6% 92.2% 93.0% 92.0% 92.0% 95% 95%

S37 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - registered nurses/ midwives (night shifts) 98.1% 98.4% 97.0% 94.0% 94.9% 91.2% 95.1% 93.7% 97.1% 90.6% 90.1% 90.6% 90.6% 95% 95%

S38 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - care staff (day shifts) 92.9% 95.3% 94.8% 93.4% 94.3% 90.5% 92.7% 93.6% 93.8% 90.3% 90.5% 92.4% 92.4% 95% 95%

S39 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - care staff (night shifts) 94.6% 95.2% 96.4% 92.4% 93.8% 91.2% 95.2% 93.3% 95.8% 92.4% 92.7% 94.7% 94.7% 95% 95%

S41 Care Hours Per Patient Day (CHPPD) 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.9 7.1 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.6 6.5 6.5 NA NA

NHS safety thermometer

S02 Safety Thermometer: % of patients harm-free 95.7% 97.4% 96.9% 95.3% 95.5% 94.4% 92.8% 92.8% 94.4% 95.3% 93.5% 96.0% 96.0% 95.70% 95.70%

S03 Safety Thermometer: % of patients with no new harms 98.4% 98.8% 98.9% 98.8% 98.8% 98.4% 97.2% 97.5% 97.9% 98.7% 97.9% 98.5% 98.5% 99% 99%

Monitoring of clinical incidents

S19 NEVER events 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

S04 Total incidents 843 774 723 739 685 801 772 765 849 716 764 734 734 763 9150

S05 Total moderate, severe or death incidents 12 14 10 18 13 15 20 14 10 17 16 18 18 13 153

S06 Total serious incidents (SIRIs) 5 8 1 5 6 2 4 10 6 3 2 8 8 4 53

S07 Number of outstanding CAS alerts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Improve safety of prescribing

S08 Total incidents involving drug/prescribing errors 104 83 85 88 73 93 85 82 99 76 78 81 81 85 1016

S09 Moderate/severe incidents involving drug/prescribing errors 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 5

Reduce incidence of healthcare acquired infections

S14 Number of hospital attributable MRSA cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

S15 Number of hospital C.diff cases 3 3 4 4 1 2 3 1 6 3 5 2 2 3 38

S28 Number of C. diff cases where a lapse in the quality of care was noted 2 1 1 4 1 0 2 1 4 2 2 0 0 1 16

S16 Number of reportable MSSA bacteraemia cases 6 7 5 12 9 9 9 8 6 7 7 10 10 8 94

S16a Number of hosptial attributable MSSA bacteraemia cases 2 1 1 3 2 3 2 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 22

S17 Number of reportable E.coli cases 28 27 39 49 31 38 36 25 35 29 33 32 32 63 751

S17a Number of hospital attributable E.coli cases 5 3 5 7 3 6 6 6 8 7 3 4 4 5 60

Improve theatre safety for patients

S18 Full compliance with WHO Surgical Safety Checklist 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.00% 100%

S30 SSIs: Total hip replacement (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 1.1% 1.1%

S33 SSIs: Total knee replacement (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 1.5% 1.5%

S34 SSIs: Large bowel surgery (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 12% 12%

S35 SSIs: Breast surgery (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 3.8% 3.8%

Reduce number of falls in hospital

4.1%

5.5%

1.6%

2.2%

9.9%

2.5%

15.0%

5.2%

9.8%

6.3%

2.0%

0.6%

Page 35: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - WSHFT Page 3 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

wshft APRIL 2018MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR YTD Actual YTD Target Target Trend

QUALITY SCORECARD - WSHFTS50 All falls 141 152 136 129 105 133 134 160 179 119 160 128 128 121 1452

S21 Falls resulting in harm 37 44 36 39 31 43 38 46 47 38 39 38 38 38 459

S22 Falls resulting in severe harm or death 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

S23 Falls assessment within 24hrs of admission (Surgery only) 83% 95% 87% 91% 91% 89% 88% 95% 93% 93% 88% 88% 88% 80% 80%

Pressure ulcers

S49 Grade 2+ pressure ulcers 24 25 16 17 25 33 52 46 43 19 37 27 27 20 240

Other safety metrics

S11 VTE Assessment Compliance 94.4% 94.8% 94.2% 94.9% 94.1% 94.9% 93.8% 93.0% 93.9% 94.1% 93.2% 94.1% 94.1% 95.3% 95.3%

Medicines Optimisation *NEW*

S44 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 2% Reduction in overall antibiotic consumption *NEW* 4.2% 10.6% 9.8% 3.3% 3.5% 8.4% 0.5% 7.6% 6.0% 4.7% 15.8% 15% 15% -2.0% -2.0%

S45 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 1% reduction in the use of carbapenems *NEW* -1.0% -1.0% 20.0% 34.0% 2.0% 8.0% -24.0% 2.0% -1.0% 13.5% -5.7% -40% -40% -1.0% -1.0%

S46 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 1% reduction in the use of Tazocin *NEW* -69.7% -67.7% -36.1% -23.3% -1.0% -43.0% -37.0% -38.0% -23.0% -34.0% -55.0% -61% -61% -1.0% -1.0%

S47 Focus on anticoagulants: Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) receiving counselling *NEW* 36.0% 49.0% 52.0% 50.0% 49.0% 56.0% 52.0% 46.0% 50.0% 46.0% 36.0% - 50.0% 50.0%

EXPERIENCEExperience domain score 2.35 2.39 2.13 2.26 2.48 2.39 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.48 2.32 2.48 2.48

Friends and Family Test

X38 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: Inpatient 96.9% 96.8% 96.7% 96.9% 96.7% 96.7% 97.0% 95.7% 97.0% 97.0% 96.3% 97.2% 97.2% 97% 97%

X39 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: A&E 84.1% 85.6% 84.8% 84.8% 84.0% 85.5% 88.1% 84.5% 88.0% 88.5% 87.4% 91.7% 91.7% 93% 93%

X40 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Antenatal care (36 weeks) 95.2% 96.3% 95.5% 100.0% 100.0% 96.6% 100.0% 89.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 97.4% 97% 97%

X41 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Delivery care 98.2% 96.3% 97.9% 97.2% 96.1% 97.5% 98.5% 97.9% 98.9% 98.4% 98.0% 97.5% 97.5% 97% 97%

X42 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Postnatal ward 98.2% 96.3% 97.9% 97.2% 96.1% 97.5% 98.5% 97.9% 98.9% 98.4% 98.0% 97.5% 97.5% 97% 97%

X43 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Postnatal community care 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% 96.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97% 97%

X44 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: Outpatient 96.1% 97.5% 96.4% 96.8% 97.4% 97.1% 97.2% 97.2% 97.7% 96.5% 97.1% 96.7% 96.7% 97% 97%

Friends and Family Test response rates

X24 Trust Friends and Family Response Rate: Inpatient 35.6% 36.9% 32.0% 41.9% 35.4% 42.2% 41.8% 35.2% 34.5% 39.0% 33.1% 37.6% 37.6% 40% 40%

X25 Trust Friends and Family Response Rate: A&E 9.3% 8.2% 9.9% 11.3% 8.1% 11.6% 13.6% 11.0% 9.1% 8.0% 10.1% 10.4% 10.4% 23% 23%

X33 Maternity Friends and Family Response Rate: Delivery care 47.7% 34.2% 33.6% 33.9% 58.5% 80.5% 65.2% 39.9% 87.9% 51.2% 48.1% 47.5% 47.5% 40% 40%

Reduction in patients suffering a bad experience dealing with the Trust

X08 Percentage of re-booked outpatient appointments 11.7% 12.5% 13.0% 12.1% 12.4% 12.6% 11.9% 13.0% 12.4% 13.6% 14.1% 13.2% 13.2% 7.80% 7.8%

X09 Clinics cancelled with less than 6 weeks notice for annual/study leave 12 15 71 70 40 26 23 20 44 41 18 22 22 24 285

X11 PALS contacts relating to appointment problems ( % of total appts) 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.08% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.10% 0.10% 0.12% 0.13% 0.14% 0.14% 0.08% 0.08%

X12 Reduce patients cancelled on the day of surgery for non-clinical reasons 39 18 23 35 9 56 41 19 29 30 42 26 26 28 336

X13 Breaches of mixed sex accommodation arrangements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nutritional Assessment

X14 Compliance with MUST tool after 24 hours 83.5% 85.6% 86.8% 87.0% 88.3% 88.3% 87.4% 83.4% 83.0% 85.6% 78.4% 87.7% 87.7% 80% 80%

X15 Compliance with MUST tool after 7 days 98.9% 98.9% 99.0% 99.5% 99.4% 99.2% 99.3% 98.8% 98.1% 98.7% 100.0% 99.3% 99.3% 95% 95%

Cleanliness / PLACE Survey

Page 36: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - WSHFT Page 4 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

wshft APRIL 2018MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR YTD Actual YTD Target Target Trend

QUALITY SCORECARD - WSHFTX16 Internal PLACE compliance 95% 96% 93% 98% 95% 97% 95% 96% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 95% 95%

Improve our customer service and become a more caring organisation

X18 Number of complaints 47 30 44 40 38 32 42 30 34 28 38 26 26 38 456

X19 Complaints where staff attitude or behaviour is an issue 8 4 5 2 4 6 2 3 1 0 3 1 1 4 43

X20 Complaints where staff communication is an issue 0 2 6 7 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 39

X21 Complaints about nursing 3 4 4 5 0 5 9 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 39

Staff engagement (indicators/targets not yet agreed) *NEW*

X47 Local staff engagement score: I am able to make improvements happen in my area of work 60.4% 63.6% 59.3% 65.1% 64.5% 60.8% 57.6% 66.1% 60.3% 56.5% 59.6% 67.6% 67.6% 68% 68%

Page 37: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - Worthing Page 5 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

WORT APRIL 2018MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR YTD Actual YTD Target Target Trend

EFFECTIVENESSEffectiveness domain score 2.41 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.48 2.46 2.36 2.29 2.22 2.30 2.47 2.00 2.20

Trust-wide mortality

E01 Trust crude mortality rate (non-elective) 3.40% 2.61% 2.50% 2.81% 2.55% 4.05% 3.96% 3.47% 4.51% 4.04% 3.85% 2.96% 2.96% 3.10% 3.10%

E02 Crude mortality rate (non-elective): 12 month rolling 3.42% 3.38% 3.34% 3.32% 3.27% 3.29% 3.33% 3.34% 3.68% 3.40% 3.42% 3.40% 3.40% 3.11% 3.11%

E03 Trust Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) (rollin 12M) 89.5 90.5 91.2 90.6 89.7 90.6 91.8 91.5 94.1 94.1 100 100

E04 Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) (rolling 12M) n/a

E45 % of Part 1 inpatient deaths reviewed 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100%

Improve mortality in specific conditions

E47 % patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy within one hour *NEW* 76.3% 76.1% 78.2% 90.2% 89.5% 85.0% 79.0% 79.0% 74.5% 77.8% 76.5% 72.26% 72.26% 90% 90%

Reduce mortality following hip fracture

E09 SMR for hip fracture (all diagnoses/procedures) (rolling 12M) 94.2 105.0 112.9 104.1 101.5 100.1 109.5 96.1 106.2 106.2 100 100

E10 30 day mortality rate following hip fracture (rolling 12M) 7.0% 7.3% 7.7% 7.5% 7.4% 7.6% 7.4% 7.4% 8.4% 8.41% 5.70% 5.70%

Increase discharge effectiveness

E59 Rate of discharges by Midday 13.2% 13.5% 12.9% 12.4% 12.3% 12.1% 14.3% 13.6% 13.4% 13.5% 13.7% 11.9% 11.9% 45% 45%

Reduce the rate of readmission following discharge from the Trust

E11 Emergency readmissions within 30 days % 13.9% 13.4% 15.1% 13.3% 14.0% 14.7% 13.5% 13.8% 12.8% 15.1% 13.1% 14.81% 14.81% 13% 13%

To improve maternity care by encouraging natural childbirth

E13 C-Section Rate 26.3% 31.1% 19.7% 28.3% 35.1% 27.7% 30.8% 36.6% 26.9% 30.2% 29.9% 26.10% 26.10% 27.80% 27.8%

E15 % Deliveries complicated by post-partum haemorrhage 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.5% 1.6% 0.5% 0.00% 0.00% 1% 1%

E17 Admission of term babies to neonatal care 1.4% 4.0% 3.6% 1.8% 1.5% 3.9% 1.9% 2.2% 1.5% 3.2% 3.1% 3.40% 3.40% 10% 10%

E55 Normal delivery rate 39.0% 36.0% 37.7% 32.5% 35.6% 33.2% 35.1% 29.1% 34.3% 34.6% 30.9% 37.4% 37.4% NA NA

E58 Induction of labour 32.4% 27.0% 34.5% 31.6% 29.8% 39.1% 30.8% 38.3% 35.8% 32.4% 34.5% 33.50% 33.50% 29.4% 29.4%

Caring for the elderly patient

E18 % Emergency admissions staying over 72h screened for dementia 92.3% 91.3% 90.0% 92.0% 86.5% 93.8% 95.8% 87.0% 94.9% 94.2% 91.8% 92.49% 92.49% 90% 90%

E39 Ward moves for patients flagged with dementia 115 81 91 55 38 97 76 99 122 92 70 90 90 85 1014

E42 Night-time ward moves for patients flagged with dementia : Total 26 23 22 11 11 23 26 37 25 25 26 19 19 21 247

E42 Night-time ward moves for patients flagged with dementia : % Total excluding Emergency Floor 26.7% 20.8% 18.8% 9.5% 25.0% 30.8% 25.0% 20.0% 26.0% 42.7% 23.7% 15.6% 15.6% NA NA

Stroke care

E26 % CT scans undertaken within 12 hours 95.2% 93.1% 98.0% 96.8% 92.9% 89.5% 97.8% 100.0% 90.9% 100.0% 97.7% - 95% 95%

E27 % Stroke thrombolysis within 60 minutes of hospital arrival 66.7% 66.7% 75.0% 100.0% 75.0% 66.7% 50.0% 83.3% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% - 95% 95%

E28 % Swallow screen for stroke patients within 4 hours of admission 90.5% 96.6% 78.0% 90.3% 100.0% 91.2% 100.0% 100.0% 88.2% 100.0% 97.4% - 95% 95%

E29 % of stroke patients admitted to stroke unit within 4 hours of admission 81.0% 79.3% 68.0% 71.0% 69.0% 76.3% 71.7% 82.4% 122.7% 100.0% 72.7% - 90% 90%

E30 % high risk TIA patients seen within 24 hours 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% - 60% 60%

Ensure active engagement with research

E23 Patients recruited with CRN portfolio 78 78 117 1400

Data Quality

QUALITY SCORECARD - Worthing

n/an/a

Page 38: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - Worthing Page 6 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

E37 % inpatients with electronic discharge summaries produced 93.5% 93.5% 94.4% 92.0% 91.4% 92.8% 92.8% 90.2% 91.7% 92.2% 92.2% 92.1% 92.1% 94.2% 94.2%

Mental Health Care *NEW*

E54 Reduced A&E vists for a cohort of frequent attenders who would benefit from MH interventions 18 14 9 24 16 3 12 7 7 2 12 6 6 18 218

SAFETYSafety domain score 2.35 2.39 2.39 2.06 2.19 2.06 2.22 2.14 2.19 2.31 2.07 2.30 2.30

Safer staffing

S36 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - registered nurses/ midwives (day shifts) 96.1% 97.0% 95.2% 94.0% 94.2% 92.4% 93.2% 95.1% 93.4% 92.9% 92.8% 91.9% 91.9% 95% 95%

S37 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - registered nurses/ midwives (night shifts) 97.8% 98.8% 97.2% 96.4% 97.2% 93.4% 96.3% 95.5% 97.1% 93.5% 90.5% 91.5% 91.5% 95% 95%

S38 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - care staff (day shifts) 90.0% 93.6% 93.7% 93.3% 94.6% 90.2% 90.9% 94.4% 90.9% 89.3% 89.9% 92.7% 92.7% 95% 95%

S39 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - care staff (night shifts) 94.0% 95.0% 96.6% 95.4% 96.8% 96.0% 98.3% 96.3% 95.5% 97.1% 95.8% 97.7% 97.7% 95% 95%

S41 Care Hours Per Patient Day (CHPPD) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

NHS safety thermometer

S02 Safety Thermometer: % of patients harm-free 94.4% 97.7% 96.0% 94.6% 95.1% 93.5% 92.3% 94.1% 93.8% 95.1% 93.0% 95.6% 95.6% 95.70% 95.70%

S03 Safety Thermometer: % of patients with no new harms 97.8% 98.3% 99.0% 98.3% 99.2% 98.1% 96.5% 97.6% 97.9% 98.7% 97.7% 98.7% 98.7% 99% 99%

Monitoring of clinical incidents

S19 NEVER events 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

S04 Total incidents 478 413 385 409 371 438 422 387 456 386 410 374 374 412 4942

S05 Total moderate, severe or death incidents 6 9 3 8 9 9 14 7 7 11 10 9 9 7 82

S06 Total serious incidents (SIRIs) 3 3 1 3 4 0 2 4 2 3 1 3 3 2 27

S07 Number of outstanding CAS alerts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Improve safety of prescribing

S08 Total incidents involving drug/prescribing errors 62 48 49 51 45 51 50 44 52 50 43 55 55 48 574

S09 Moderate/severe incidents involving drug/prescribing errors 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3

Reduce incidence of healthcare acquired infections

S14 Number of hospital attributable MRSA cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

S15 Number of hospital C.diff cases 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 2 3 1 1 2 19

S28 Number of C. diff cases where a lapse in the quality of care was noted 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 8

S16 Number of reportable MSSA bacteraemia cases 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 4 8 8 4 47

S16a Number of hosptial attributable MSSA bacteraemia cases 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 11

S17 Number of reportable E.coli cases 19 12 23 32 14 18 23 15 18 13 16 21 21 36 432

S17a Number of hospital attributable E.coli cases 3 1 4 5 2 3 5 5 4 4 0 3 3 3 30

Improve theatre safety for patients

S18 Full compliance with WHO Surgical Safety Checklist 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.00% 100%

S30 SSIs: Total hip replacement (YTD is rolling 12 months) n/a n/a n/a n/a

S33 SSIs: Total knee replacement (YTD is rolling 12 months) n/a n/a n/a n/a

S34 SSIs: Large bowel surgery (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 12% 12%

S35 SSIs: Breast surgery (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 3.8% 3.8%

Reduce number of falls in hospital

S50 All falls 83 83 63 70 53 77 57 78 99 60 77 55 55 61 726

n/a n/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a

12.0%

45.8% 4.6%

12.9% 20.4%

5.4%

Page 39: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - Worthing Page 7 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

S21 Falls resulting in harm 24 26 15 27 21 27 14 25 32 22 23 17 17 21 254

S22 Falls resulting in severe harm or death 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

S40 Repeat falls 5 3 6 8 3 7 6 3 6 5 8 4 4 5 62

S23 Falls assessment within 24hrs of admission (Surgery only) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Pressure ulcers

S49 Grade 2+ pressure ulcers 20 15 11 13 15 23 41 32 26 13 22 19 19 10 120

Other safety metrics

S11 VTE Assessment Compliance 95.4% 96.0% 95.3% 95.4% 93.8% 94.8% 93.8% 93.9% 94.7% 95.1% 93.3% 93.8% 93.8% 95.3% 95.3%

Medicines Optimisation *NEW*

S44 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 2% Reduction in overall antibiotic consumption *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

S45 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 1% reduction in the use of carbapenems *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

S46 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 1% reduction in the use of Tazocin *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

S47 Focus on anticoagulants: Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) receiving counselling *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

EXPERIENCEExperience domain score 2.35 2.39 2.13 2.26 2.48 2.39 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.48 2.32 2.25 2.25

Friends and Family Test

X38 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: Inpatient 97.4% 96.8% 96.8% 96.2% 96.8% 95.9% 96.7% 94.6% 97.3% 96.8% 95.6% 97.1% 97.1% 97% 97%

X39 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: A&E 83.6% 85.1% 85.5% 88.1% 86.0% 84.6% 85.8% 82.6% 87.6% 88.6% 89.5% 91.5% 91.5% 93% 93%

X40 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Antenatal care (36 weeks) 100.0% 85.7% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 95.8% 97% 97%

X41 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Delivery care 96.5% 95.9% 97.6% 95.3% 95.2% 96.8% 99.1% 100.0% 98.8% 97.7% 97.1% 96.7% 96.7% 97% 97%

X42 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Postnatal ward 96.5% 95.9% 97.6% 95.3% 95.2% 96.8% 99.1% 100.0% 98.8% 97.7% 97.1% 96.7% 96.7% 97% 97%

X43 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Postnatal community care n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

X44 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: Outpatient 95.2% 97.4% 96.2% 96.8% 96.6% 96.6% 0.0% 97.4% 97.9% 96.3% 97.4% 96.3% 96.3% 97% 97%

Friends and Family Test response rates

X24 Trust Friends and Family Response Rate: Inpatient 39.6% 42.4% 29.3% 40.0% 34.4% 38.5% 37.0% 30.0% 30.2% 37.9% 37.7% 36.9% 36.9% 40% 40%

X25 Trust Friends and Family Response Rate: A&E 10.0% 8.3% 11.1% 12.7% 8.1% 9.9% 12.4% 9.4% 8.2% 8.2% 12.3% 11.1% 11.1% 23% 23%

X33 Maternity Friends and Family Response Rate: Delivery care 53.1% 44.1% 37.7% 40.1% 44.0% 61.9% 56.3% 28.0% 80.6% 48.4% 35.6% 44.3% 44.3% 40% 40%

Reduction in patients suffering a bad experience dealing with the Trust

X08 Percentage of re-booked outpatient appointments 0.0% 12.8% 13.4% 12.2% 12.5% 12.9% 12.6% 13.9% 13.2% 14.1% 14.9% 13.7% 13.7% 7.80% 7.8%

X09 Clinics cancelled with less than 6 weeks notice for annual/study leave 8 12 55 50 15 16 8 9 34 24 13 15 15 13 156

X11 PALS contacts relating to appointment problems ( % of total appts) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

X12 Reduce patients cancelled on the day of surgery for non-clinical reasons 15 11 10 17 5 43 25 12 7 5 16 16 16 14 168

X13 Breaches of mixed sex accommodation arrangements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nutritional Assessment

X14 Compliance with MUST tool after 24 hours 82.0% 85.3% 86.2% 83.4% 87.4% 85.4% 82.8% 81.6% 79.7% 87.0% 75.0% 89.6% 89.6% 80% 80%

X15 Compliance with MUST tool after 7 days 99.0% 99.1% 99.0% 99.5% 99.7% 99.1% 99.1% 98.8% 99.2% 99.2% 100.0% 99.8% 99.8% 95% 95%

Cleanliness / PLACE Survey

X16 Internal PLACE compliance 96% 95% 96% 97% 96% 95% 94% 96% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 95% 95%

Improve our customer service and become a more caring organisation

X18 Number of complaints 25 12 27 21 29 17 26 16 23 13 18 11 11 19 228

Page 40: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - Worthing Page 8 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

X19 Complaints where staff attitude or behaviour is an issue 0 1 3 1 4 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 22

X20 Complaints where staff communication is an issue 0 1 5 4 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 20

X21 Complaints about nursing 0 2 1 2 0 1 8 0 1 1 3 4 4 2 20

Staff engagement (indicators/targets not yet agreed) *NEW*

X47 Local staff engagement score: I am able to make improvements happen in my area of work n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Page 41: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - St Richards Page 9 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

SRH APRIL 2018MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR YTD Actual YTD Target Target Trend

EFFECTIVENESSEffectiveness domain score 2.41 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.48 2.46 2.36 2.29 2.22 2.30 2.47 2.06 2.11

Trust-wide mortality

E01 Trust crude mortality rate (non-elective) 2.18% 2.51% 2.80% 2.36% 2.77% 2.26% 2.10% 3.03% 3.98% 3.66% 3.17% 3.24% 3.24% 3.10% 3.10%

E02 Crude mortality rate (non-elective): 12 month rolling 2.78% 2.82% 2.82% 2.84% 2.90% 2.83% 2.76% 2.74% 2.75% 2.78% 2.77% 2.84% 2.84% 3.11% 3.11%

E03 Trust Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) (rollin 12M) 84.8 87.3 89.1 85.9 87.6 85.6 84.9 84.2 83.4 83.4 100 100

E04 Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) (rolling 12M) n/a

E45 % of Part 1 inpatient deaths reviewed 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100%

Improve mortality in specific conditions

E47 % patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy within one hour *NEW* 75.4% 78.8% 79.2% 82.6% 83.6% 81.6% 90.9% 90.9% 74.2% 77.3% 80.7% 85.71% 85.71% 90% 90%

Reduce mortality following hip fracture

E09 SMR for hip fracture (all diagnoses/procedures) (rolling 12M) 78.1 88.1 89.1 87.4 83.3 79.1 78.7 80.4 82.2 82.2 100 100

E10 30 day mortality rate following hip fracture (rolling 12M) 5.8% 6.3% 6.6% 7.0% 6.9% 8.1% 8.1% 6.3% 6.3% 6.27% 5.70% 5.70%

Increase discharge effectiveness

E59 Rate of discharges by Midday 15.1% 15.4% 15.3% 13.8% 13.9% 13.9% 14.0% 14.2% 16.1% 13.9% 15.3% 13.8% 13.8% 45% 45%

Reduce the rate of readmission following discharge from the Trust

E11 Emergency readmissions within 30 days % 15.4% 13.7% 14.2% 13.5% 13.6% 14.1% 14.5% 13.3% 13.5% 13.7% 14.5% 13.42% 13.42% 13% 13%

To improve maternity care by encouraging natural childbirth

E13 C-Section Rate 27.7% 29.3% 26.1% 25.8% 24.1% 26.6% 26.8% 29.6% 31.7% 34.1% 32.6% 26.60% 26.60% 27.80% 27.8%

E15 % Deliveries complicated by post-partum haemorrhage 1.2% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.50% 0.50% 1% 1%

E17 Admission of term babies to neonatal care 5.6% 4.0% 3.3% 5.5% 3.3% 3.2% 3.3% 5.3% 2.7% 4.4% 3.1% 5.10% 5.10% 10% 10%

E55 Normal delivery rate 33.9% 34.1% 37.9% 35.2% 39.1% 39.3% 35.9% 31.7% 27.6% 27.4% 26.3% 30.8% 30.8% NA NA

E58 Induction of labour 38.0% 34.5% 37.4% 37.1% 28.0% 34.4% 38.3% 45.2% 37.5% 35.7% 42.4% 42.10% 42.10% 29.4% 29.4%

Caring for the elderly patient

E18 % Emergency admissions staying over 72h screened for dementia 94.6% 90.7% 91.4% 91.5% 79.0% 94.7% 98.1% 87.5% 92.4% 90.5% 85.0% 89.77% 89.77% 90% 90%

E39 Ward moves for patients flagged with dementia 120 99 112 125 72 77 87 118 114 101 102 117 117 103 1233

E42 Night-time ward moves for patients flagged with dementia : Total 17 23 16 11 12 21 18 29 17 19 33 26 26 21 252

E42 Night-time ward moves for patients flagged with dementia : % Total excluding Emergency Floor 26.7% 20.8% 18.8% 9.5% 25.0% 30.8% 25.0% 20.0% 26.0% 42.7% 23.7% 15.6% 15.6% NA NA

Stroke care

E26 % CT scans undertaken within 12 hours 92.3% 97.3% 95.6% 96.8% 97.3% 90.9% 97.4% 89.7% 92.2% 96.4% 93.1% - 95% 95%

E27 % Stroke thrombolysis within 60 minutes of hospital arrival 50.0% 75.0% 60.0% 100.0% 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 66.7% - 95% 95%

E28 % Swallow screen for stroke patients within 4 hours of admission 84.6% 78.4% 62.2% 80.6% 74.2% 76.3% 74.3% 57.7% 59.6% 80.0% 89.3% - 95% 95%

E29 % of stroke patients admitted to stroke unit within 4 hours of admission 82.1% 78.4% 73.3% 71.0% 83.8% 72.7% 78.9% 65.5% 19.6% 67.9% 75.9% - 90% 90%

E30 % high risk TIA patients seen within 24 hours 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 9.1% 12.5% 16.7% 9.1% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% - 60% 60%

Ensure active engagement with research

E23 Patients recruited with CRN portfolio 68 68 117 1400

Data Quality

QUALITY SCORECARD - St Richards

n/an/a

Page 42: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - St Richards Page 10 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

E37 % inpatients with electronic discharge summaries produced 94.2% 93.1% 94.8% 94.2% 93.9% 93.9% 93.9% 92.6% 92.6% 93.2% 92.0% 93.4% 93.4% 94.2% 94.2%

Mental Health Care *NEW*

E54 Reduced A&E vists for a cohort of frequent attenders who would benefit from MH interventions 19 32 18 12 18 23 19 11 10 20 16 21 21 18 218

SAFETYSafety domain score 2.35 2.39 2.39 2.06 2.19 2.06 2.22 2.14 2.19 2.31 2.07 2.37 2.37

Safer staffing

S36 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - registered nurses/ midwives (day shifts) 98.3% 98.3% 97.4% 94.4% 93.8% 90.9% 95.6% 92.9% 98.3% 91.4% 93.1% 92.1% 92.1% 95% 95%

S37 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - registered nurses/ midwives (night shifts) 98.4% 97.8% 96.8% 90.8% 92.0% 88.2% 93.6% 91.4% 97.2% 87.0% 89.6% 89.4% 89.4% 95% 95%

S38 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - care staff (day shifts) 96.9% 97.6% 96.4% 93.7% 93.8% 90.8% 95.2% 92.5% 97.9% 91.6% 91.2% 91.9% 91.9% 95% 95%

S39 Safer Staffing: Average fill rate - care staff (night shifts) 95.4% 95.4% 96.0% 88.1% 89.5% 84.6% 90.8% 89.1% 96.2% 85.8% 88.3% 90.6% 90.6% 95% 95%

S41 Care Hours Per Patient Day (CHPPD) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

NHS safety thermometer

S02 Safety Thermometer: % of patients harm-free 97.1% 97.1% 97.8% 96.0% 96.4% 95.2% 93.5% 91.1% 94.9% 95.3% 93.8% 96.4% 96.4% 95.70% 95.70%

S03 Safety Thermometer: % of patients with no new harms 99.1% 99.3% 98.8% 99.5% 98.2% 98.7% 98.1% 97.4% 97.8% 98.6% 98.0% 98.2% 98.2% 99% 99%

Monitoring of clinical incidents

S19 NEVER events 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

S04 Total incidents 365 361 338 330 314 363 350 378 393 330 354 360 360 351 4208

S05 Total moderate, severe or death incidents 6 5 7 10 4 6 6 7 3 6 6 9 9 6 74

S06 Total serious incidents (SIRIs) 2 5 0 2 2 2 2 6 4 0 1 5 5 2 28

S07 Number of outstanding CAS alerts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Improve safety of prescribing

S08 Total incidents involving drug/prescribing errors 42 35 36 37 28 42 35 38 47 26 35 26 26 37 442

S09 Moderate/severe incidents involving drug/prescribing errors 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3

Reduce incidence of healthcare acquired infections

S14 Number of hospital attributable MRSA cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

S15 Number of hospital C.diff cases 2 0 2 3 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 19

S28 Number of C. diff cases where a lapse in the quality of care was noted 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 8

S16 Number of reportable MSSA bacteraemia cases 2 3 1 6 3 3 4 2 0 2 3 2 2 4 47

S16a Number of hosptial attributable MSSA bacteraemia cases 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 11

S17 Number of reportable E.coli cases 9 15 16 17 17 20 13 10 17 16 17 11 11 27 319

S17a Number of hospital attributable E.coli cases 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 4 3 3 1 1 3 30

Improve theatre safety for patients

S18 Full compliance with WHO Surgical Safety Checklist 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.00% 100%

S30 SSIs: Total hip replacement (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 1.1% 1.1%

S33 SSIs: Total knee replacement (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 1.5% 1.5%

S34 SSIs: Large bowel surgery (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 12% 12%

S35 SSIs: Breast surgery (YTD is rolling 12 months) - 3.8% 3.8%

Reduce number of falls in hospital

S50 All falls 58 69 73 59 52 56 77 82 80 59 83 73 73 61 726

0.6% 2.5% 1.6%

2.0% 4.1% 10.6%

8.5%

65.8% 0.0%

7.0% 10.6%

7.4%

Page 43: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - St Richards Page 11 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

S21 Falls resulting in harm 13 18 21 12 10 16 24 21 15 16 16 21 21 17 205

S22 Falls resulting in severe harm or death 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

S40 Repeat falls 4 6 1 4 0 5 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 36

S23 Falls assessment within 24hrs of admission (Surgery only) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Pressure ulcers

S49 Grade 2+ pressure ulcers 4 10 5 4 10 10 11 14 17 6 15 8 8 10 120

Other safety metrics

S11 VTE Assessment Compliance 93.3% 93.5% 93.0% 94.3% 94.3% 95.0% 93.7% 92.0% 92.9% 92.9% 93.2% 94.5% 94.5% 95.3% 95.3%

Medicines Optimisation *NEW*

S44 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 2% Reduction in overall antibiotic consumption *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

S45 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 1% reduction in the use of carbapenems *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

S46 Antimicrobial stewardship and consumption: 1% reduction in the use of Tazocin *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

S47 Focus on anticoagulants: Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) receiving counselling *NEW* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

EXPERIENCEExperience domain score 2.35 2.39 2.13 2.26 2.48 2.39 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.48 2.32 2.65 2.65

Friends and Family Test

X38 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: Inpatient 96.1% 96.7% 96.5% 97.6% 96.6% 97.4% 97.3% 96.5% 96.8% 97.2% 97.3% 97.4% 97.4% 97% 97%

X39 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: A&E 84.8% 86.4% 83.6% 79.6% 81.5% 86.3% 90.5% 86.3% 88.4% 88.3% 82.9% 91.9% 91.9% 93% 93%

X40 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Antenatal care (36 weeks) 92.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97% 97%

X41 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Delivery care 100.0% 96.8% 98.4% 100.0% 96.6% 97.9% 98.1% 96.8% 99.0% 99.0% 98.5% 98.1% 98.1% 97% 97%

X42 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Postnatal ward 100.0% 96.8% 98.4% 100.0% 96.6% 97.9% 98.1% 96.8% 99.0% 99.0% 98.5% 98.1% 98.1% 97% 97%

X43 Maternity Friends and Family Recommend %: Postnatal community care n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

X44 Trust Friends and Family Recommend %: Outpatient 97.7% 98.0% 95.7% 96.9% 98.1% 98.4% 0.0% 96.6% 97.5% 97.3% 96.8% 97.0% 97.0% 97% 97%

Friends and Family Test response rates

X24 Trust Friends and Family Response Rate: Inpatient 31.3% 31.2% 34.8% 44.0% 36.4% 45.6% 46.6% 40.4% 38.8% 40.3% 28.2% 38.4% 38.4% 40% 40%

X25 Trust Friends and Family Response Rate: A&E 8.4% 8.1% 8.5% 9.7% 8.0% 13.7% 15.2% 13.1% 10.2% 7.7% 7.4% 9.6% 9.6% 23% 23%

X33 Maternity Friends and Family Response Rate: Delivery care 43.0% 25.3% 29.4% 27.7% 72.0% 95.9% 74.2% 51.1% 94.6% 54.2% 58.9% 50.5% 50.5% 40% 40%

Reduction in patients suffering a bad experience dealing with the Trust

X08 Percentage of re-booked outpatient appointments 0.0% 12.1% 12.4% 11.9% 12.3% 12.1% 10.9% 11.6% 11.1% 12.8% 13.0% 12.4% 12.4% 7.80% 7.8%

X09 Clinics cancelled with less than 6 weeks notice for annual/study leave 4 3 16 20 25 10 15 11 10 17 3 7 7 11 129

X11 PALS contacts relating to appointment problems ( % of total appts) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

X12 Reduce patients cancelled on the day of surgery for non-clinical reasons 24 7 13 18 4 13 16 7 22 25 26 9 9 14 168

X13 Breaches of mixed sex accommodation arrangements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nutritional Assessment

X14 Compliance with MUST tool after 24 hours 84.8% 85.8% 87.4% 90.3% 89.1% 90.8% 91.3% 85.0% 85.7% 84.5% 81.7% 86.2% 86.2% 80% 80%

X15 Compliance with MUST tool after 7 days 98.9% 98.7% 99.0% 99.5% 99.1% 99.2% 99.6% 98.7% 96.7% 98.2% 100.0% 98.9% 98.9% 95% 95%

Cleanliness / PLACE Survey

X16 Internal PLACE compliance 93% 96% 90% 98% 94% 98% 95% 95% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 95% 95%

Improve our customer service and become a more caring organisation

X18 Number of complaints 22 18 17 19 9 15 16 14 11 15 20 15 15 19 228

Page 44: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Keith Ashall, Senior Health Intelligence Analystt: 01903 205111 (ext 84478)

5.1(a) Copy of Quality scorecard 1819_M01_Trust.Quality Scorecard - St Richards Page 12 of 12 Printed 24/05/2018 20:35

X19 Complaints where staff attitude or behaviour is an issue 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 22

X20 Complaints where staff communication is an issue 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 20

X21 Complaints about nursing 0 2 3 3 0 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 20

Staff engagement (indicators/targets not yet agreed) *NEW*

X47 Local staff engagement score: I am able to make improvements happen in my area of work n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Page 45: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardNurseScorecard 1 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Shift Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDActual

Trend

Day 97.3% 97.1% 97.6% 96.2% 94.2% 94.0% 91.7% 94.3% 94.1% 95.6% 92.2% 93.0% 92.0% 92.0%Night 97.7% 98.1% 98.4% 97.0% 94.0% 94.9% 91.2% 95.1% 93.7% 97.1% 90.6% 90.1% 90.6% 90.6%Day 98.3% 97.4% 100.0% 98.7% 97.4% 95.3% 95.2% 95.7% 91.3% 98.7% 94.3% 94.5% 92.3% 92.3%

Night 99.2% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% 97.5% 96.0% 95.0% 92.7% 98.4% 93.8% 91.9% 91.7% 91.7%

Day 94.8% 99.3% 97.0% 97.8% 91.8% 95.2% 86.7% 95.2% 95.3% 96.8% 90.9% 93.9% 89.3% 89.3%

Night 91.7% 100.0% 95.0% 91.9% 82.3% 91.7% 75.8% 91.7% 91.9% 91.9% 80.4% 80.6% 81.7% 81.7%

Day - - - - - - - - - - - - 81.3% 81.3%

Night - - - - - - - - - - - - 90.0% 90.0%

Day 96.9% 96.5% 98.6% 97.3% 93.8% 96.1% 95.2% 90.8% 96.8% 93.5% 92.9% 96.0% 93.6% 93.6%

Night 100.0% 97.6% 99.2% 99.2% 97.6% 98.3% 97.6% 98.3% 95.2% 96.8% 92.0% 92.7% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 98.0% 97.7% 95.3% 95.2% 94.5% 96.0% 93.2% 97.3% 100.0% 98.1% 97.9% 97.4% 93.0% 93.0%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 96.8% 98.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.3% 83.3% 83.3%

Day 100.0% 92.1% 88.0% 87.7% 100.0% 97.4% 100.0% 97.3% 93.3% 94.9% 97.1% 90.4% 100.0% 100.0%

Night 95.1% 83.9% 89.9% 86.8% 100.0% 95.8% 100.0% 94.7% 93.8% 97.3% 94.2% 89.3% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 100.0% 99.1% 91.4% 96.6% 97.2% 99.0% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 100.0% 93.2% 93.2%

Night 100.0% 97.3% 99.0% 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 95.9% 98.4% 97.6% 97.3% 98.3% 96.6% 96.6%

Day 97.9% 100.0% 98.8% 97.6% 97.2% 95.8% 91.1% 99.6% 97.6% 98.4% 96.9% 92.7% 99.6% 99.6%

Night 96.7% 100.0% 96.7% 95.2% 95.2% 91.7% 83.9% 100.0% 96.8% 96.8% 96.4% 87.1% 95.0% 95.0%

Day 95.4% 94.5% 93.5% 94.1% 93.4% 95.4% 93.0% 96.6% 94.8% 95.2% 89.8% 91.1% 87.7% 87.7%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 95.6% 95.7% 94.6% 100.0% 92.5% 96.7% 92.5% 94.6% 89.3% 91.4% 91.1% 91.1%

Day 99.6% 98.4% 99.6% 97.6% 95.2% 96.7% 87.9% 91.3% 89.9% 98.0% 88.8% 90.7% 88.3% 88.3%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% 90.3% 95.0% 83.9% 80.0% 80.6% 95.2% 78.6% 80.6% 81.7% 81.7%

Day 96.0% 93.8% 98.5% 95.7% 98.1% 98.5% 82.7% 90.6% 87.0% 80.4% 83.0% 81.7% 84.1% 84.1%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 96.8% 94.6% 85.5% 81.7% 81.7%

Day 95.6% 95.3% 99.4% 98.2% 89.4% 95.1% 86.7% 87.2% 94.0% 91.2% 94.1% 88.8% - -

Night 96.7% 98.4% 100.0% 98.4% 96.8% 100.0% 96.8% 93.3% 98.4% 100.0% 98.2% 90.3% - -

Balcombe

WSHFT

Burlington

Bluefin

Bosham

Botolphs

Acute Cardiac Unit

Ashling

Barrow

Beeding

Becket

Boxgrove

Buckingham

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - Registered Nurses

Page 46: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardNurseScorecard 2 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Shift Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDActual

Trend

Day 97.3% 97.1% 97.6% 96.2% 94.2% 94.0% 91.7% 94.3% 94.1% 95.6% 92.2% 93.0% 92.0% 92.0%Night 97.7% 98.1% 98.4% 97.0% 94.0% 94.9% 91.2% 95.1% 93.7% 97.1% 90.6% 90.1% 90.6% 90.6%

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - Registered Nurses

Day 99.3% 97.8% 100.0% 93.5% 96.1% 96.7% 97.1% 96.3% 96.8% 94.3% 92.9% 94.3% 95.6% 95.6%

Night 98.9% 96.8% 98.9% 98.9% 91.4% 93.3% 86.0% 92.2% 95.7% 93.5% 84.5% 80.6% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 95.8% 98.3% 97.1% 94.7% 90.8% 87.5% 86.2% 93.0% 91.0% 98.1% 90.7% 94.2% 92.4% 92.4%

Night 96.8% 98.7% 96.4% 95.6% 87.3% 85.9% 84.6% 93.2% 92.5% 97.8% 86.9% 92.1% 93.2% 93.2%

Day 99.0% 100.0% 98.5% 98.1% 96.7% 96.1% 94.8% 99.0% 98.1% 100.0% 93.8% 87.8% 91.7% 91.7%

Night 96.7% 100.0% 96.7% 96.8% 88.7% 90.0% 87.1% 98.3% 98.4% 100.0% 87.5% 77.4% 86.7% 86.7%

Day 98.8% 98.8% 97.9% 94.0% 91.1% 94.2% 91.1% 93.3% 93.1% 95.2% 95.1% 94.4% 93.8% 93.8%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 96.8% 98.4% 98.3% 95.2% 98.3% 96.8% 98.4% 98.2% 91.9% 88.3% 88.3%

Day 97.9% 99.2% 97.5% 92.3% 92.7% 91.7% 88.7% 95.8% 95.6% 93.5% 99.6% 98.4% 97.1% 97.1%

Night 96.7% 98.4% 96.7% 96.8% 93.5% 96.7% 87.1% 93.3% 95.2% 98.4% 96.4% 93.5% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 98.8% 97.2% 95.4% 91.1% 90.7% 90.8% 93.5% 93.3% 96.0% 89.5% 93.3% 94.4% 91.3% 91.3%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.9% 91.9% 95.0% 96.8% 98.3% 96.8% 96.8% 96.4% 82.3% 78.3% 78.3%

Day 97.7% 96.5% 97.3% 94.5% 92.6% 92.7% 92.6% 95.0% 95.2% 95.2% 92.9% 94.8% 94.3% 94.3%

Night 99.3% 96.1% 100.0% 98.1% 96.1% 94.7% 92.9% 96.0% 94.2% 95.5% 94.3% 92.9% 94.7% 94.7%

Day 99.0% 96.3% 98.1% 98.6% 94.9% 91.9% 91.7% 90.5% 94.5% 92.2% 88.8% 88.5% 94.8% 94.8%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 98.3% 95.2% 98.3% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% 93.5% 91.7% 91.7%

Day 98.1% 96.3% 97.1% 96.8% 93.5% 95.7% 91.7% 94.3% 96.8% 93.5% 96.9% 98.6% 94.8% 94.8%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 98.3% 98.4% 95.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 91.7% 91.7%

Day 97.5% 93.1% 98.8% 96.8% 96.0% 93.8% 91.5% 92.1% 94.8% 96.8% 93.8% 91.1% 91.7% 91.7%

Night 100.0% 98.9% 100.0% 98.9% 98.9% 100.0% 97.8% 96.7% 98.9% 100.0% 95.2% 93.5% 95.6% 95.6%

Day 97.3% 94.0% 100.0% 97.4% 97.0% 93.7% 91.7% 89.7% 91.2% 92.2% 95.2% 91.3% 87.8% 87.8%

Night 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 98.4% 96.8% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% 98.4% 98.4% 96.4% 95.2% 90.0% 90.0%

Day 95.8% 95.2% 96.1% 95.7% 92.7% 91.0% 90.9% 89.9% 93.4% 91.1% 87.6% 87.0% 88.1% 88.1%

Night 98.9% 98.4% 99.7% 96.8% 93.5% 94.7% 86.6% 95.0% 91.1% 95.2% 89.3% 86.0% 90.0% 90.0%

Eartham

Eastbrook

Clapham

Coombes

Emergency Floor Worthing

Courtlands

Ditchling

Durrington

Castle

Chilgrove

Chiltington

Chichester Emergency Floor

Page 47: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardNurseScorecard 3 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Shift Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDActual

Trend

Day 97.3% 97.1% 97.6% 96.2% 94.2% 94.0% 91.7% 94.3% 94.1% 95.6% 92.2% 93.0% 92.0% 92.0%Night 97.7% 98.1% 98.4% 97.0% 94.0% 94.9% 91.2% 95.1% 93.7% 97.1% 90.6% 90.1% 90.6% 90.6%

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - Registered Nurses

Day 99.2% 98.4% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% 93.3% 96.8% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% 96.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 97.6% 94.0% 96.2% 91.7% 94.0% 94.3% 94.5% 94.8% 97.7% 95.4% 95.4% 97.7% 97.1% 97.1%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% 98.3% 98.4% 100.0% 91.1% 91.9% 90.0% 90.0%

Day 97.1% 91.5% 97.5% 99.6% 98.8% 93.3% 97.2% 96.7% 88.7% 98.8% 87.9% 92.7% 88.3% 88.3%

Night 95.0% 85.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86.7% 100.0% 93.3% 79.0% 100.0% 75.0% 80.6% 76.7% 76.7%

Day 94.3% 98.7% 99.3% 98.1% 95.2% 95.0% 92.9% 97.7% 95.5% 99.4% 95.0% 97.1% 93.0% 93.0%

Night 90.0% 98.9% 98.9% 96.8% 91.4% 92.2% 88.2% 94.4% 92.5% 97.8% 92.9% 92.5% 87.8% 87.8%

Day 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 100.0% 99.0% 99.0% 100.0% 97.5% 99.2% 100.0% 94.6% 98.3% 100.0% 100.0%

Night 90.5% 100.0% 93.4% 99.0% 96.9% 98.9% 99.2% 100.0% 99.2% 100.0% 95.5% 100.0% 99.0% 99.0%

Day 94.1% 99.3% 98.5% 97.1% 92.5% 93.7% 90.0% 95.9% 90.3% 96.1% 85.7% 90.7% 87.4% 87.4%

Night 91.7% 98.4% 96.7% 96.8% 83.9% 88.3% 83.9% 90.0% 82.3% 88.7% 66.1% 85.5% 75.0% 75.0%

Day 96.7% 97.6% 98.8% 96.0% 88.3% 92.5% 84.3% 92.5% 87.5% 97.6% 84.4% 86.7% 88.3% 88.3%

Night 95.0% 95.2% 100.0% 95.2% 64.5% 85.0% 66.1% 86.7% 77.4% 93.5% 60.7% 71.0% 75.0% 75.0%

Day 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% 100.0% 98.9% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% 98.6% 98.8% 98.2% 98.2%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% 100.0% 97.6% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 99.4% 97.8% 100.0% 96.8% 91.4% 90.0% 90.3% 92.2% 94.1% 99.5% 92.3% 95.7% 90.6% 90.6%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 91.9% 88.3% 90.3% 90.0% 96.8% 98.4% 94.6% 95.2% 91.7% 91.7%

Day 96.5% 100.0% 99.6% 97.9% 95.4% 93.1% 85.4% 95.7% 90.8% 99.2% 93.5% 93.3% 97.0% 97.0%

Night 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 97.8% 93.5% 92.2% 81.7% 94.4% 89.2% 97.8% 92.9% 93.5% 95.6% 95.6%

Day 99.6% 100.0% 98.8% 96.8% 96.4% 95.0% 94.8% 96.3% 97.6% 98.8% 90.2% 90.7% 93.3% 93.3%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 93.5% 93.5% 96.7% 91.9% 93.3% 95.2% 98.4% 83.9% 88.7% 90.0% 90.0%Wittering

Ford

Lavant

Neonatal Unit

Petworth

Enhanced Surgical Care Unit

Erringham

Fishbourne

Selsey

Howard Children's Unit

Middleton

Page 48: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCareScorecard 4 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Shift Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDActual

Trend

Day 95.4% 92.9% 95.3% 94.8% 93.4% 94.3% 90.5% 92.7% 93.6% 93.8% 90.3% 90.5% 92.4% 92.4%Night 96.2% 94.6% 95.2% 96.4% 92.4% 93.8% 91.2% 95.2% 93.3% 95.8% 92.4% 92.7% 94.7% 94.7%Day 92.7% 87.1% 96.7% 93.5% 91.0% 94.0% 88.4% 94.7% 91.0% 95.5% 88.6% 95.5% 86.7% 86.7%

Night 90.0% 64.5% 90.0% 90.3% 74.2% 86.7% 67.7% 76.7% 90.3% 83.9% 67.9% 90.3% 73.3% 73.3%

Day 97.6% 94.9% 97.1% 96.8% 91.7% 97.6% 93.5% 95.7% 92.2% 98.6% 94.4% 93.5% 93.8% 93.8%

Night 95.0% 91.9% 95.0% 96.8% 85.5% 95.0% 88.7% 91.7% 85.5% 98.4% 83.9% 85.5% 98.3% 98.3%

Day - - - - - - - - - - - - 84.4% 84.4%

Night - - - - - - - - - - - - 93.3% 93.3%

Day 92.8% 87.4% 93.3% 92.2% 95.2% 91.4% 88.2% 89.7% 94.1% 90.1% 87.8% 86.0% 94.4% 94.4%

Night 97.5% 97.6% 97.5% 96.8% 97.6% 95.8% 94.4% 99.2% 98.4% 98.4% 99.1% 92.7% 99.2% 99.2%

Day 95.7% 85.7% 93.7% 93.8% 87.8% 97.2% 83.6% 90.8% 97.2% 92.5% 87.9% 88.4% 92.9% 92.9%

Night 98.3% 91.9% 95.0% 96.8% 93.5% 98.3% 96.8% 100.0% 96.8% 95.2% 100.0% 93.5% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 100.0% 96.8% 97.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.9% 97.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.5% 94.3% 100.0% 100.0% 83.1% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% 74.2% 88.3% 88.3%

Night 72.2% 95.5% 90.3% 96.8% 87.1% 92.9% 100.0% 90.3% 96.8% 93.3% 92.6% 87.1% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 99.3% 100.0% 99.3% 92.3% 92.9% 91.3% 93.5% 96.7% 94.8% 97.4% 93.6% 84.5% 91.3% 91.3%

Night 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 93.5% 90.3% 88.3% 95.2% 98.3% 96.8% 96.8% 92.9% 88.7% 91.7% 91.7%

Day 93.8% 83.8% 93.9% 95.5% 93.0% 97.7% 90.0% 93.5% 91.8% 89.3% 93.9% 90.0% 91.6% 91.6%

Night 93.3% 91.9% 96.7% 90.3% 91.9% 96.7% 96.8% 98.3% 93.5% 91.9% 91.1% 98.4% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 93.8% 95.9% 99.5% 96.3% 95.4% 94.3% 93.5% 95.7% 93.1% 95.9% 95.4% 92.6% 87.6% 87.6%

Night 91.7% 91.9% 100.0% 95.2% 90.3% 86.7% 93.5% 91.7% 82.3% 91.9% 89.3% 90.3% 81.7% 81.7%

Day 98.8% 89.0% 95.6% 95.2% 93.9% 96.2% 82.9% 86.7% 88.5% 82.2% 77.0% 82.3% 89.3% 89.3%

Night 98.3% 100.0% 95.0% 98.4% 96.8% 100.0% 95.2% 98.3% 95.2% 95.2% 92.9% 96.8% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 98.5% 90.9% 90.6% 88.6% 91.6% 86.2% 91.4% 87.7% 97.1% 96.5% 93.0% 93.0% - -

Night 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% 100.0% 90.3% 96.7% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% - -

Buckingham

Burlington

WSHFT

Acute Cardiac Unit

Boxgrove

Ashling

Beeding

Bluefin

Bosham

Botolphs

Becket

Barrow

Balcombe

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - Care Staff

Page 49: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCareScorecard 5 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Shift Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDActual

Trend

Day 95.4% 92.9% 95.3% 94.8% 93.4% 94.3% 90.5% 92.7% 93.6% 93.8% 90.3% 90.5% 92.4% 92.4%Night 96.2% 94.6% 95.2% 96.4% 92.4% 93.8% 91.2% 95.2% 93.3% 95.8% 92.4% 92.7% 94.7% 94.7%

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - Care Staff

Day 98.1% 93.5% 96.2% 94.5% 94.0% 95.2% 94.0% 91.4% 97.2% 95.9% 94.9% 82.9% 95.7% 95.7%

Night 96.7% 90.3% 100.0% 96.8% 95.2% 98.3% 98.4% 100.0% 91.9% 91.9% 92.9% 88.7% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 96.4% 95.5% 97.5% 97.3% 96.0% 93.1% 89.0% 93.9% 89.3% 98.4% 92.6% 92.8% 90.9% 90.9%

Night 92.9% 90.5% 94.4% 94.5% 89.1% 87.2% 75.3% 80.3% 73.8% 94.6% 86.4% 84.9% 74.5% 74.5%

Day 95.0% 100.0% 99.2% 96.0% 90.3% 92.5% 83.1% 90.8% 96.0% 100.0% 84.8% 77.4% 91.7% 91.7%

Night 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 90.3% 91.7% 75.8% 91.7% 95.2% 100.0% 89.3% 83.9% 98.3% 98.3%

Day 98.9% 96.2% 90.0% 91.4% 93.0% 96.1% 95.2% 90.0% 95.7% 95.7% 94.0% 93.5% 95.0% 95.0%

Night 100.0% 91.9% 91.7% 95.2% 88.7% 95.0% 95.2% 96.7% 95.2% 93.5% 98.2% 98.4% 96.7% 96.7%

Day 98.1% 90.8% 94.8% 91.2% 94.9% 97.1% 91.2% 89.0% 92.6% 83.9% 88.3% 91.7% 91.0% 91.0%

Night 98.3% 90.3% 95.0% 93.5% 91.9% 95.0% 93.5% 93.3% 90.3% 95.2% 98.2% 93.5% 98.3% 98.3%

Day 95.0% 89.8% 75.6% 91.9% 91.9% 95.6% 89.8% 91.7% 93.0% 96.2% 91.1% 84.9% 90.0% 90.0%

Night 96.7% 93.5% 85.0% 96.8% 93.5% 95.0% 96.8% 98.3% 98.4% 90.3% 98.2% 96.8% 96.7% 96.7%

Day 93.3% 94.2% 96.0% 96.1% 96.8% 98.0% 92.3% 92.0% 94.2% 86.5% 92.9% 92.9% 88.7% 88.7%

Night 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Day 95.6% 87.1% 91.7% 90.3% 88.2% 88.3% 80.6% 90.6% 93.0% 93.0% 85.7% 93.0% 90.0% 90.0%

Night 96.7% 93.5% 91.7% 95.2% 96.8% 98.3% 98.4% 98.3% 95.2% 96.8% 96.4% 95.2% 98.3% 98.3%

Day 94.2% 91.9% 99.2% 97.6% 95.6% 94.2% 90.7% 93.8% 94.0% 93.1% 89.3% 94.8% 97.1% 97.1%

Night 96.7% 95.2% 91.7% 98.4% 96.8% 96.7% 93.5% 100.0% 93.5% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 94.0% 83.2% 89.3% 95.5% 86.5% 89.3% 85.8% 91.3% 93.5% 80.6% 76.4% 81.9% 92.0% 92.0%

Night 86.7% 74.2% 96.7% 90.3% 87.1% 90.0% 90.3% 93.3% 100.0% 90.3% 89.3% 100.0% 96.7% 96.7%

Day 95.3% 85.8% 100.0% 97.4% 94.2% 97.3% 92.3% 90.7% 96.1% 90.3% 85.0% 88.4% 92.0% 92.0%

Night 96.7% 93.5% 95.0% 93.5% 96.8% 93.3% 98.4% 100.0% 96.8% 95.2% 94.6% 95.2% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 93.3% 91.9% 93.8% 93.1% 96.6% 96.5% 94.0% 93.7% 96.5% 94.2% 90.0% 92.4% 93.2% 93.2%

Night 98.7% 94.5% 95.7% 98.7% 98.7% 97.3% 95.2% 99.3% 98.7% 97.4% 98.9% 97.4% 98.3% 98.3%

Chilgrove

Chiltington

Clapham

Eastbrook

Emergency Floor Worthing

Coombes

Courtlands

Ditchling

Durrington

Eartham

Castle

Chichester Emergency Floor

Page 50: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCareScorecard 6 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Shift Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDActual

Trend

Day 95.4% 92.9% 95.3% 94.8% 93.4% 94.3% 90.5% 92.7% 93.6% 93.8% 90.3% 90.5% 92.4% 92.4%Night 96.2% 94.6% 95.2% 96.4% 92.4% 93.8% 91.2% 95.2% 93.3% 95.8% 92.4% 92.7% 94.7% 94.7%

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - Care Staff

Day 98.3% 95.2% 95.0% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 99.2% 100.0% 98.4% 97.3% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0%

Night 96.7% 100.0% 90.0% 100.0% 96.8% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 93.5% 92.9% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0%

Day 100.0% 90.3% 100.0% 91.0% 78.1% 85.3% 80.6% 76.0% 85.2% 74.8% 85.7% 97.4% 95.3% 95.3%

Night 100.0% 91.9% 100.0% 95.2% 91.9% 98.3% 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% 90.3% 98.2% 96.8% 98.3% 98.3%

Day 92.8% 98.4% 93.3% 96.8% 89.2% 93.3% 90.3% 95.0% 87.1% 98.9% 92.3% 95.2% 86.7% 86.7%

Night 98.3% 100.0% 86.7% 98.4% 82.3% 90.0% 85.5% 91.7% 79.0% 98.4% 83.9% 93.5% 86.7% 86.7%

Day 96.0% 94.2% 96.0% 94.8% 93.5% 94.7% 91.6% 92.7% 92.9% 98.1% 92.1% 90.3% 92.7% 92.7%

Night 98.3% 93.5% 93.3% 95.2% 91.9% 93.3% 91.9% 88.3% 93.5% 96.8% 87.5% 88.7% 95.0% 95.0%

Day 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% 85.2% 85.7% 96.8% 93.3% 93.3%

Night 100.0% 0.0% 66.7% 100.0% 84.0% 73.3% 64.5% 93.3% 96.2% 92.0% 53.8% 74.2% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 92.1% 96.0% 97.5% 97.6% 93.5% 92.1% 92.7% 96.3% 89.9% 97.6% 91.5% 90.3% 96.3% 96.3%

Night 88.3% 87.1% 95.0% 95.2% 79.0% 80.0% 83.9% 90.0% 77.4% 95.2% 82.1% 82.3% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 98.0% 100.0% 99.3% 92.3% 92.9% 93.3% 80.0% 94.7% 91.0% 97.4% 88.6% 92.9% 90.0% 90.0%

Night 98.3% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% 88.7% 95.0% 67.7% 90.0% 91.9% 98.4% 87.5% 90.3% 93.3% 93.3%

Day 100.0% 100.0% 82.6% 93.3% 100.0% 91.7% 100.0% 75.0% 92.3% 96.6% 95.7% 96.2% 92.3% 92.3%

Night 96.2% 100.0% 88.0% 100.0% 89.7% 87.5% 90.0% 89.5% 95.8% 93.5% 92.0% 100.0% 96.6% 96.6%

Day 92.7% 100.0% 98.0% 96.8% 98.1% 95.3% 96.8% 96.0% 97.4% 98.7% 95.7% 96.1% 97.3% 97.3%

Night 93.3% 100.0% 96.7% 93.5% 95.2% 95.0% 95.2% 91.7% 96.8% 98.4% 94.6% 98.4% 96.7% 96.7%

Day 94.6% 100.0% 98.4% 97.9% 93.2% 97.8% 93.2% 96.7% 99.0% 100.0% 94.2% 92.7% 96.2% 96.2%

Night 93.3% 100.0% 96.7% 96.8% 87.1% 96.7% 93.5% 93.3% 96.8% 100.0% 91.1% 88.7% 96.7% 96.7%

Day 94.0% 100.0% 99.3% 100.0% 93.5% 88.0% 80.6% 94.7% 91.6% 99.4% 82.9% 80.6% 92.7% 92.7%

Night 98.3% 100.0% 98.3% 100.0% 91.9% 85.0% 75.8% 95.0% 93.5% 100.0% 82.1% 83.9% 93.3% 93.3%

Fishbourne

Wittering

Ford

Lavant

Neonatal Unit

Petworth

Selsey

Middleton

Howard Children's Unit

Enhanced Surgical Care Unit

Erringham

Page 51: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCHPPD 7 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Care Hours Per Patient

Day (CHPPD)Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDAverage

Trend

Nurse 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7Care 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7Overall 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.9 7.1 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.5 6.5Nurse 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.7 5.0 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4

Care 1.9 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.9 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.7

Overall 6.5 6.3 6.5 6.9 6.2 6.4 6.4 7.0 6.5 6.3 6.0 6.3 6.1 6.1

Nurse 3.5 3.6 3.5 4.2 5.3 6.0 3.1 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.1

Care 2.9 2.8 2.8 3.5 4.4 5.0 2.7 2.8 2.6 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8

Overall 6.4 6.4 6.3 7.7 9.7 11.0 5.8 6.2 5.9 6.5 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9

Nurse - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.7 2.7

Care - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.1 2.1

Overall - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.8 4.8

Nurse 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.9 3.9

Care 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.3 4.0 4.0

Overall 6.8 6.7 7.4 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.8 6.6 6.6 6.9 7.9 7.9

Nurse 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.4

Care 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.5

Overall 7.0 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.8 6.5 6.8 7.1 6.6 7.1 6.7 6.9 6.9

Nurse 7.2 5.2 4.3 4.8 5.3 4.8 7.4 5.1 5.8 8.1 6.0 7.4 7.1 7.1

Care 2.3 2.1 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.2 3.4 2.2 2.3 3.3 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.2

Overall 9.5 7.2 6.0 7.0 7.6 7.0 10.8 7.3 8.1 11.4 8.5 10.4 10.3 10.3

Nurse 6.3 5.5 4.2 4.8 5.9 5.5 5.6 4.6 6.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 5.1 5.1

Care 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.5 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.9 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5

Overall 7.4 6.6 5.6 6.3 8.2 7.2 7.0 6.1 8.5 6.5 6.9 5.9 6.6 6.6

Nurse 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.5

Care 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3

Overall 6.0 5.9 6.1 5.6 5.9 6.0 5.7 6.1 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.7

Becket

Beeding

Bluefin

Bosham

WSHFT

Acute Cardiac Unit

Ashling

Barrow

Balcombe

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - CHPPD

Page 52: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCHPPD 8 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Care Hours Per Patient

Day (CHPPD)Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDAverage

Trend

Nurse 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7Care 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7Overall 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.9 7.1 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.5 6.5

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - CHPPD

Nurse 3.9 3.8 4.2 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6

Care 3.5 3.1 3.8 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.4

Overall 7.4 6.9 8.0 6.8 7.3 7.4 6.7 7.0 6.9 6.7 6.8 6.7 7.1 7.1

Nurse 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.7 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.7 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8

Care 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.7 3.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5

Overall 5.8 5.7 5.9 5.7 7.0 5.6 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.7 5.5 5.3 5.3 5.3

Nurse 2.2 2.2 3.1 2.7 3.3 3.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1

Care 1.9 1.7 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9

Overall 4.1 3.9 5.6 5.1 5.9 6.0 4.0 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.9 3.9

Nurse 3.4 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.2 - -

Care 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.5 - -

Overall 6.1 5.9 6.2 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.5 5.5 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.8 - -

Nurse 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7

Care 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.8 2.8

Overall 6.5 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.2 6.0 6.5 6.5

Nurse 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.8 4.1 4.5 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.2

Care 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2

Overall 7.2 6.9 6.8 7.2 7.5 7.2 6.9 7.5 6.3 7.0 6.1 6.1 6.4 6.4

Nurse 5.1 6.0 4.2 5.3 5.0 4.3 4.5 4.3 5.2 5.1 5.2 4.9 4.5 4.5

Care 3.4 4.0 2.9 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.7 2.7 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.2

Overall 8.5 10.0 7.1 8.8 8.2 7.2 7.2 7.0 8.7 8.5 8.5 8.0 7.8 7.8

Nurse 4.4 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.9 4.1 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.1

Care 3.5 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4

Overall 7.9 7.4 7.4 7.0 7.0 7.4 7.0 7.4 7.3 7.1 7.3 7.6 7.4 7.4

Nurse 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2

Care 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.8

Overall 6.3 5.8 6.2 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.4 5.8 5.8 5.4 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.0

Botolphs

Boxgrove

Buckingham

Burlington

Castle

Chichester Emergency Floor

Chilgrove

Chiltington

Clapham

Page 53: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCHPPD 9 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Care Hours Per Patient

Day (CHPPD)Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDAverage

Trend

Nurse 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7Care 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7Overall 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.9 7.1 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.5 6.5

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - CHPPD

Nurse 3.2 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1

Care 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6

Overall 5.7 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.6 5.7 5.7

Nurse 8.4 8.2 8.3 7.9 8.3 8.9 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.5 8.1 7.9 8.6 8.6

Care 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7

Overall 11.1 10.9 11.0 10.6 11.2 12.0 10.5 10.2 10.1 9.7 10.8 10.5 11.3 11.3

Nurse 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0

Care 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6

Overall 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.6

Nurse 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.1

Care 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6

Overall 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.7

Nurse 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.3

Care 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.4

Overall 6.5 6.2 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.8 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.7 6.7

Nurse 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.4 6.0 4.4 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.1

Care 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.5 4.5 3.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4

Overall 5.8 5.6 6.2 5.8 5.9 10.4 7.6 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.5 5.5

Nurse 5.1 5.0 5.4 4.9 5.0 5.0 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.9 4.9

Care 4.1 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.3 4.4 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.8 4.4 4.4

Overall 9.2 9.0 9.7 8.9 9.3 9.3 8.1 8.4 8.2 7.8 8.4 8.0 9.4 9.4

Nurse 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.5 8.9 9.3 8.8 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.7 9.9 9.5 9.5

Care 8.8 8.8 8.6 9.5 8.9 9.5 8.8 8.5 8.9 9.0 8.4 9.7 9.5 9.5

Overall 17.7 17.8 17.7 19.0 17.8 18.8 17.6 17.0 17.8 18.3 17.1 19.6 19.0 19.0

Nurse 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4

Care 2.7 2.4 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7

Overall 6.0 5.7 6.2 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.7 5.2 5.6 5.9 6.1 6.1

Emergency Floor

Coombes

Courtlands

Ditchling

Durrington

Eartham

Eastbrook

Enhanced Surgical Care Unit

Erringham

Page 54: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Operational Planning and Performance: Quality

5.1(b) Copy of SaferStaffingScorecard_1819_M01 SaferStaffingWardCHPPD 10 of 10 24/05/2018 20:36

April 2018Care Hours Per Patient

Day (CHPPD)Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

YTDAverage

Trend

Nurse 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7Care 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7Overall 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.9 7.1 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.5 6.5

WSHFT

SAFER STAFFING SCORECARD - CHPPD

Nurse 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 2.9 3.2 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.8

Care 2.5 2.7 2.4 3.1 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.3

Overall 5.8 5.8 5.5 7.0 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.9 5.1 5.8 5.2 5.5 5.1 5.1

Nurse 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.4 4.0 4.1 3.8 4.2 4.0 4.3 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.9

Care 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.8 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1

Overall 6.4 6.4 6.5 8.1 6.1 6.2 5.9 6.3 6.1 6.6 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1

Nurse 8.2 7.6 7.5 7.0 7.0 6.9 8.4 5.4 6.6 5.8 6.1 5.2 5.2 5.2

Care 1.7 0.0 0.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.5

Overall 9.9 7.6 8.0 8.7 8.9 8.9 10.2 6.7 8.0 6.9 7.2 6.3 6.6 6.6

Nurse 3.3 3.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.3 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.0

Care 2.9 3.0 3.1 4.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.4 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.1

Overall 6.2 6.6 6.6 8.6 6.6 6.9 6.4 7.0 6.2 6.3 5.6 6.0 6.1 6.1

Nurse 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.6 3.1 2.7 3.0 2.8 3.1 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7

Care 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.8 2.2 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0

Overall 5.5 5.3 5.3 5.2 6.3 5.4 4.5 5.1 4.8 5.2 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8

Nurse 10.9 7.7 5.1 6.4 5.8 8.3 8.0 6.4 6.3 6.0 5.5 6.4 7.3 7.3

Care 3.7 2.6 1.3 2.3 1.8 2.0 3.0 1.3 1.8 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.4

Overall 14.6 10.3 6.4 8.7 7.6 10.3 11.0 7.7 8.1 8.1 7.2 8.5 9.7 9.7

Nurse 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.1 11.2 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1

Care 2.7 2.9 2.8 3.1 2.9 10.5 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9

Overall 6.0 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.0 21.7 5.9 6.0 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.9

Nurse 4.8 3.7 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.6

Care 3.6 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8

Overall 8.4 6.6 6.8 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.1 6.5 6.3 6.6 6.4 6.6 6.4 6.4

Nurse 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.2 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1

Care 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.2

Overall 6.2 6.0 5.7 5.5 6.0 5.6 5.5 6.0 5.4 5.8 5.2 4.9 5.3 5.3

Wittering

Fishbourne

Ford

Howard Children's Unit

Lavant

Middleton

Neonatal Unit

Petworth

Selsey

Page 55: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

1

Title

Month 1, 2018-19 Performance Report

Responsible Executive Director

Jane Farrell, Chief Operating Officer

Prepared by

Giles Frost, Interim Director – Performance & Information

Status

Disclosable

Summary of Proposal The paper sets out organisational compliance against national and local key performance metrics. The report summarises both in year and projected year end performance for Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, as detailed in dedicated performance scorecards relating to Quality Board indicators aligned to the Quality Strategy, the NHSI Single Oversight Framework and, when relevant, other indicators. This paper describes performance on an exceptional basis determined by RAG rating, key national/regulatory significance, or in year trend analysis.

Implications for Quality of Care

Describes Quality Outcome KPIs

Link to Strategic Objectives/Board Assurance Framework

Trust Strategic Theme B - Provide the highest possible quality of care to our patients. This we will do through focusing on a range of measures to improve clinical effectiveness. Trust Strategic Theme G - Ensure the sustainability of our organisation by exceeding our national targets and financial performance and investing in appropriate infrastructure and capacity. Trust Strategic Theme F - Improve our performance against a range of quality, access and productivity measures through the introduction and spread of best practice throughout the organisation.

Financial Implications

Describes KPIs linked to financial performance

Human Resource Implications

Describes KPIs linked to workforce

Recommendation

The Board is asked to: NOTE the Trust position against the NHS Single Oversight Framework and STF Performance Monitoring targets.

Communication and Consultation

Not applicable

Appendices

Appendix 1: Key Performance Deliverables, Operational Performance Scorecard, Single Oversight Framework Scorecard, STF Performance Monitoring.

To: Trust Board

Date of Meeting: 31st May 2018 Agenda Item: 5.2

Page 56: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

2

To: Trust Board Date: 31 May 2018

From: Jayne Black, Chief Operating Officer Agenda Item: 5.2

FOR INFORMATION

WSHFT PERFORMANCE REPORT: MONTH 1, 2018/19

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 This report summarises both current in year and projected performance for Western Sussex

Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, with further detail provided in the appendices relating to:

• The NHSI Single Oversight Framework

• Key Performance Deliverables Report

• Operational Performance Scorecard

• Sustainability and Transformation Fund Performance Monitoring

1.2 This paper provides the Board with an update on performance on a specific basis determined by

RAG rating, national significance, or in year trend analysis.

1.3 Introduced as a condition of the National Sustainability and Transformation Programme and

Funding, all Trusts have again submitted joint performance trajectories on the key areas of A&E,

RTT, and Cancer. The detailed tracking of the Trust’s performance against this trajectory is

included in an Appendix of this report, and performance against the requirements is summarised

for each relevant performance area. The trajectory has changed for 2018/19 based on specific

criteria for all indicators. The Sustainability and Transformation Fund payments in 2018/19 are

indicatively based on A&E performance against trajectory as per NHS Improvement guidance.

2. SUMMARY PERFORMANCE

2.1 Under the Single Oversight Framework, the Trust was compliant for Cancer against STF

trajectory in April. RTT 18 week compliance was below the national constitutional targets and

STF trajectory for April. A&E performance improved significantly and was ahead of the STF

trajectory but below the National constitutional target of 95%. Diagnostics was compliant against

national target in April.

Page 57: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

3

2.2 Operationally April saw an increased level of A&E demand, and an increase in emergency

admissions relative to the same period in 2017.

• 11,770 A&E attendances compared to 11,573 in April 2017 (representing a 1.7%

increase on this time last year). For patients aged 65 and over there was an increase

in attendances of 3.6%. For patients aged 85 and over, the increase was 4.0%.

• 4,955 emergency admissions in April 2018 comparison to 4,647 in April 2017, an

increase of 6.6%.

• Over 65 emergency admissions increased in April 2018 with a 4.8% increase

compared to April 2017. For patients 85 and over, the increase was 9.5%.

• Formally reportable Delayed Transfers of Care totalled 2.52% for April 2018. This is a

decrease from the March figure of 2.99%.

• Average Inpatient Bed Occupancy reached 94.12% in April, a decrease on March

occupancy of 1.6%. The highest occupancy the trust reached during the month was

98.49% and the lowest was 90.18%. On average, 30 escalation beds per day were

open across the trust during April, ranging from between 8 to 42 beds. This is a

decrease of 4 beds on average from the March position. The Trust flexes the number

of open beds to respond to fluctuations in demand.

3. KEY AREAS OF PERFORMANCE 3.1 A&E Compliance

3.1.1 The Trust was not compliant against the National target in April, with 94.6% of patients waiting

less than four hours from arrival at A&E to admission, transfer, or discharge, an increase of 4.6%

against March performance. This includes attendances from Bognor Minor Injuries Unit, and the

emergency floor activity from both sites.

3.1.2 April performance of 94.6% was compliant with the delivery requirements of the in-month

Sustainability and Transformation Fund trajectory for quarter 1 of 94.6%

3.1.3 By site, St Richard’s Hospital (SRH) performance in April was 94.49%, with Worthing (WSH)

achieving 93.99%. Emergency admissions at SRH increased by 9.4% from April 2017. Worthing

saw a smaller increase in emergency admissions of 4.2% over the same period. For the 85+ age

group, SRH saw an increase of 12.7%, an additional 49 admissions from this time last year,

compared to Worthing with 4.6%.

3.1.4 Worthing saw an average of 464 beds occupied in April, which is a decrease of 26 from 490 in

March. Worthing had an average occupancy of 94.23% in April, with the highest occupancy of

98.41% on 2nd April. Emergency medical length of stay at Worthing decrease to 6.4 days in April

from 7.2 days March. SRH saw an average of 392 beds occupied in April, an increase of 5 from

Page 58: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

4

387 in March 2018. Occupancy at SRH averaged 93.98% in April 2018, reaching 99.51% also on

3rd April. For SRH, emergency medical length of stay remained static at 5.6 days on average in

April.

3.1.5 In April, delayed transfers of care (DTOC) decreased to 2.52% compared to 2.99% in March.

April DTOCs peaked at 3.54% on 29th April. In real terms, this reflects an impact in ‘lost’ beds that

fluctuated between a minimum of c11 beds and a high of c32 beds during the month.

3.1.6 Patients who were medically fit for discharge (MFFD) decreased by 39 to 120 patients on

average per day in April. The number of patients medically fit for discharge fluctuated between 92

patients on the 23rd April and 146 on 7th April.

3.1.7 The number of adult patients (medical and surgical patients) with a LOS greater than 7 days at

the trust was 42 patients more than on average per day April 2017. This is 1 patient on average

fewer than observed March 2018.

3.1.8 Nationally and regionally A&E delivery has continued to be challenging but did show some

recovery in April. National performance increased to 88.5% in April 2018 from 84.6% in March

2018 for all attendances. Board members should note these figures also include type 3 A&E

attendances (such as minor injuries units) for non-acute providers. Regionally, compliance for the

South of England remained at 90.3%, with NHS England South Surrey & Sussex Trusts

(excluding WSHFT) generating aggregate compliance of 91.0%.

3.1.9 The publication of national data confirms that WSHFT with 94.6% was the 21st highest performing

trust nationally in April 2018, and the 8th best performing trust in NHS South. Note that these

figures include type 3 attendances for other non-acute providers in the Coastal West Sussex

Acute Trust Footprint.

3.1.10 For type 1 attendances only (major A&E Unit activity, including the Trust’s Emergency Floor

activity), the Trust’s performance for April 2018 was 94.2% and was ranked 13th best performing

trust.

3.1.11 May has shown further improved performance at the Trust, with A&E performance to the 20th

May of 96.3%.

3.2 Cancer

3.2.1 The Trust was provisionally compliant against the 62 day metrics relating to the Single Oversight

Framework in April, and against all 7 wider cancer metrics (including metrics outside of the Single

Oversight Framework) to the Trust in April.

Page 59: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

5

3.2.2 The trust was compliant against the 62 day GP target with 86.21% against a target of 85%, and

compliant against 62 day urgent and screening pathways (as monitored as part of the STF and

Single Oversight Framework) with 86.84%. The board is reminded that there is approximately a

six week lag from the end of the reporting period, to publication of final performance for cancer

metrics.

3.2.3 2 week referrals received in April 2018 were 26.5% higher than the level observed in April 2017.

Note that Easter fell in the middle of April in 2017 which would have had an impact on referrals.

Over the year, May 2017 to April 2018, 2 week referrals increased by 2.6% from the preceding

year.

3.2.4 For context, latest comparative nationally published data relating to March 2018 shows national

aggregate compliance for cancer attendance to be:

• 82.2% for treatment within 62 days from GP referral (target 85.0%) compared to

WSHFT performance of 90.6%. WSHFT is the 35th best performing trust against this

standard nationally in the year to date and the 8th best in the South of England. In

March 2018, just over a third of Trusts receiving GP referrals in England were non-

compliant against this standard.

3.3 Referral to Treatment (RTT/18 Weeks)

3.3.1 The Trust has agreed a revised trajectory for 18/19 of 85% (National standard 92%), maintaining

the required waiting list size as was at the end of March 2018. The Trust was non-compliant

against the National Constitutional Target of 92% in April with 84.34% of pathways waiting less

than 18 weeks.

3.3.2 This is a 0.66% deterioration in performance since April (85.0%). Numbers of patients waiting

over 18 weeks increased by 423 patients between March and April. Latest published national

data relates to March 2018 and shows national compliance has further reduced to 87.2% from

87.9%. This figure is exclusive of independent sector providers and does not reflect a number of

large acute NHS providers that currently are not reporting RTT positions as part of agreed

‘special measure’ arrangements. Trust performance dipped below the national compliance figure

in July and has remained below to March with 85.0% for the Trust compared to 87.2% nationally.

Over half (58%) of Trusts were non-compliant in March.

3.3.3 There were zero patients waiting over 52 weeks at the end April 2018.

3.3.4 The Trust is undertaking robust recovery plans against the main non-compliant areas. This is in

particular for ophthalmology, orthopaedics, cardiology and neurology. The Chief Operating Officer

is leading weekly meetings with all divisions to reinvigorate pathway management, booking

Page 60: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

6

processes, and clinic and theatre productivity. At the time of writing, the Trust is anticipating, as

this work commences , a marginal improvement in performance in May.

3.3.5 The Trust has observed a significant rise in referrals in April 2018 (+10.1%), in comparison with

April 2017. Some caution is required in this however, as Easter fell mid-April in 2017. The Trust

will continue to monitor this closely, as if sustained will require a significant step up in activity

beyond that planned within the LHE, to sustain the waiting list size.

3.3.6 The Trust completed 10,359 RTT patient pathways in April 2018.

3.4 Diagnostic Test Waiting Times

3.4.1 The Trust compliance for April was 0.85% over 6 week waiters across all diagnostic modes,

which is compliant against the 1% national target. This represents 42 over 6 week waiters of a

total list of 4917 patients.

3.4.2 WSHFT performance compared favourably against regional peers in March (the latest

comparable national data); with South of England Region aggregate compliance of 1.2% and

National compliance at 2.1%, compared to WSHFT March performance of 0.8%. Just over a fifth

of Trusts were non-compliant in March 2018.

4 RECOMMENDATION

4.1 The Board is asked to receive the Month 1 position.

4.2 The Board is also asked to note the year to date compliance against the delivery requirements of

the Sustainability and Transformation Fund (STF) for Cancer and A&E, and non-compliant

position for RTT.

Jayne Black, Chief Operating Officer

21st May 2018

Page 61: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Mark Dennis, Head of Information Servicest: 01903 285273 (ext 5273)

Single Oversight Framework M01.1.SCORECARD Page 1 of 1 Printed 25/05/2018 13:25

APRIL 2018

Threshold Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MarYear to

Date Trend

Operational Performance MetricsOP1

A&E: maximum waiting time of four hours from arrival to admission/transfer/discharge

95% 94.6% 94.6%

OP2Maximum time of 18 weeks from point of referral to treatment in aggregate – patients on an incomplete pathway

92% 84.3% 88.5%

OP3A All cancers : 62-day wait for first treatment following urgent GP Referral 85% 86.2% 86.2%

OP3BAll cancers : 62-day wait for first treatment following consultant screening service referral

90% 90.7% 90.7%

OP4 Maximum 6-week wait for diagnostic procedures 1% 0.9% 0.9%

Notes

NHS ImprovementSingle Oversight Framework

Page 62: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Mark Dennis, Head of Information Servicest: 01903 285273 (ext 85273)

Key deliverables report M01.1.Exception Report Page 1 of 2 Printed 25/05/2018 13:28

APRIL 2018

Description / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

94.63% 94.63% >95%

Actions:1. Enhanced discharge planning arrangements 2. Augmented patient flow arrangements in conjunction with external partners3. Dedicated operational delivery review cycle under the leadership of the Chief Operating Officer

Description / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

95.33% 95.33% >93%

Actions:1. Management/tracking oversight through DDO led Cancer Delivery Group2. Dedicated weekly review led by Chief Operating Officer

Description / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

93.57% 93.57% >93%

Actions:1. Management/tracking oversight through DDO led Cancer Delivery Group2. Dedicated weekly review led by Chief Operating Officer

Cancer - 62 days from referral to treatment following screening contact Description / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

90.70% 90.70% >90%

Actions:1. Management/tracking oversight through DDO led Cancer Delivery Group2. Dedicated weekly review led by Chief Operating Officer

Patients with cancer can expect to commence treatment within 62 days following referral after a positive screening test.

Target

90%

Delays in receipt of onward referral from screening which reduces the time to secure capacity to treat patients.

Cancer - Two weeks from urgent GP referral to first appt - Breast symptoms

Significant and sustained increases in demand level.

Cancer - Two weeks from urgent GP referral to first appointment

Target

Target Patients with breast symptoms can expect to be seen within 2 weeks following an urgent GP referral.

93%

Significant and sustained increases in demand level.

Key Performance Deliverables ReportA&E 4-hour waiting time target

Target

95%

Patients can expect to be admitted, transferred or discharged in 4 hours from arrival in A&E

Sustained increases in underlying demand and acuity. Increased demand challenging ability to maintain hospital/system flow essential to delivery of A&E waiting time.

93.0%

Patients can expect to be seen within 2 weeks following an urgent GP referral for suspected cancer.

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

Page 63: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Mark Dennis, Head of Information Servicest: 01903 285273 (ext 85273)

Key deliverables report M01.1.Exception Report Page 2 of 2 Printed 25/05/2018 13:28

APRIL 2018Key Performance Deliverables ReportDescription / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

86.21% 86.21% >85%

Actions:1. Management/tracking oversight through DDO led Cancer Delivery Group2. Dedicated weekly review led by Chief Operating Officer

Description / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

84.34% 84.34% >90%

Actions:1. Increase in internal capacity as per Monitor/NHSE agreed Joint Recovery Plan developed with support from IMAS2. CCWSCCG commitment to reduced demand levels as supporting component of Joint Recovery Plan.3. Dedicated weekly Divisional review meeting, with overarching assurance review by Chief Operating Officer (also weekly)4. System Summit meetings with Monitor/NHSE to ensure partner deliver of agree Joint Recovery Plan actions.

Description / Comments / Actions

Month YTD Projected O/T

70.10% 70.10% >90%

Actions: 1. Improved tracking and escalation processes in place to manage fluctuations in demand on a daily basis2. Revised protocol introduced based on four key demand based triggers to ensure early escalation/intervention in periods of abnormal demand.

% Medically fit hip fracture patients going to theatre within 36 hours

Target

Increased volume of demand and variation of demand have impacted sustained compliance.

To ensure the best possible outcomes, hip fracture patients who are medically fit should be operated on within 36 hours of admission. This standard is part of the 'Best Practice Tariff' payment process under PbR.90%

Non-compliance an expected outcome of planned RTT recovery programme.

85%

Demand pressure exposing pathway efficiencies. Reduces the time to secure capacity to treat patients.

92.0%

Cancer - 62 days from referral to treatment following urgent referral by a GP.

Target

Referral to treatment - Incomplete Pathways

Target All patients can expect to commence treatment within 18 weeks of a referral to consultant.

Patients with cancer can expect to commence treatment within 62 days following urgent referral by a GP.

80%82%84%86%88%90%92%94%96%98%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar Ap

r

Page 64: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Mark Dennis, Head of Information Servicest: 01903 285273 (ext 85273)

Operational performance scorecard M01.1.SCORECARD Page 1 of 3 Printed 25/05/2018 13:26

APRIL 2018

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar APR2018/19

YTD2018/19Target Trend

NATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS

O01A&E : Four-hour maximum wait from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge

94.9% 95.2% 94.1% 94.2% 95.1% 95.4% 94.1% 92.7% 85.4% 89.5% 92.8% 90.0% 94.6% 94.63% 95%

O02 Cancer: 2 week GP referral to 1st outpatient 94.36% 96.60% 95.65% 95.92% 96.91% 95.75% 96.71% 96.71% 96.97% 95.94% 96.84% 97.12% 95.33% 95.33% 93%

O03 Cancer: 2 week GP referral to 1st outpatient - breast symptoms 91.67% 99.38% 98.26% 92.67% 98.73% 99.19% 97.24% 94.87% 96.89% 91.58% 99.32% 95.53% 93.57% 93.57% 93%

O04 Cancer: 31 day second or subsequent treatment - surgery 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.00% 94%

O05 Cancer: 31 day second or subsequent treatment - drug 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% 94.7% 98%

O06 Cancer: 31 day diagnosis to treatment for all cancers 100.00% 100.00% 99.64% 99.65% 100.00% 100.00% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 96%

O07 Cancer: 62 day referral to treatment from screening 100.00% 93.48% 90.91% 98.08% 94.20% 98.15% 94.23% 94.20% 96.00% 85.19% 96.55% 97.62% 90.70% 90.7% 90%

O08 Cancer: 62 day referral to treatment from hospital specialist 90.91% 93.33% 94.44% 84.62% 68.75% 67.86% 96.15% 92.86% 89.66% 84.00% 96.77% 82.76% 92.59% 92.6% N/A

O09 Cancer: 62 days urgent GP referral to treatment of all cancers 94.09% 90.30% 89.33% 86.22% 86.55% 87.74% 88.92% 91.91% 86.29% 88.06% 86.03% 90.56% 86.21% 86.2% 85%

O14 RTT - Incomplete - 92% in 18 weeks 90.74% 91.28% 90.58% 89.41% 88.95% 88.72% 88.42% 89.02% 87.07% 86.64% 86.36% 85.10% 84.34% 84.34% 92%

O15RTT delivery in all specialties(Incomplete pathways)

8 6 8 9 11 10 11 11 12 13 11 12 11 13 0

O16 Diagnostic Test Waiting Times 0.92% 0.97% 0.92% 1.00% 1.28% 0.99% 0.61% 0.69% 1.31% 0.83% 0.68% 0.97% 0.85% 0.85% <1%

O17 Cancelled operations not re-booked within 28 days 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 3 3 3 8 13 -

O18 Urgent operations cancelled for the second time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

O19Clinics cancelled with less than 6 weeks notice for annual/study leave

17 11 15 71 71 40 26 23 20 44 41 21 22 379 -

O20 Mixed Sex Accommodation breaches 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

O33 Delayed transfers of care 3.12% 3.15% 3.15% 3.34% 4.32% 4.15% 3.34% 3.47% 2.73% 3.07% 3.14% 2.99% 2.52% 2.5% 3.0%

IMPROVING CLINICAL PROCESSES

O23 % hip fracture repair within 36 hours 88.9% 90.5% 95.3% 89.3% 84.2% 88.2% 88.0% 90.5% 83.3% 96.2% 83.3% 88.1% 70.1% 70.1% 90%

O24Patients that have spent more than 90% of their stay in hospital on a stroke unit+ 90.9% 84.3% 84.0% 88.5% #N/A #N/A 80%92.7%90.9%

OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORECARD

Page 65: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Mark Dennis, Head of Information Servicest: 01903 285273 (ext 85273)

Operational performance scorecard M01.1.SCORECARD Page 2 of 3 Printed 25/05/2018 13:26

APRIL 2018

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar APR2018/19

YTD2018/19Target Trend

OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE SCORECARD

OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

O36 Average length of stay - Elective 3.19 2.94 3.04 3.07 3.09 2.99 3.35 3.22 3.63 2.95 3.13 3.41 2.97 2.97 3.72

O37 Average length of stay - Non-elective Surgery 5.16 5.61 5.87 5.34 5.76 5.66 5.29 5.93 5.38 5.80 5.89 5.51 5.91 5.91 6.07

O38 Average length of stay - Non-elective Medicine 7.60 8.07 7.68 7.88 7.61 7.31 7.82 7.79 7.37 8.03 7.88 7.94 7.73 7.73 7.80

O39Day case rate (CQC day case basket of procedures)source: Dr Foster (reported 2-3 months in arrears)

90.08% 89.01% 88.38% 86.03% 90.80% 89.70% 90.10% 90.00% 91.85% 93.86% #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 75.0%

O40 Elective day of surgery rate (DOSR) 97.2% 98.8% 98.5% 98.1% 98.2% 98.4% 98.5% 99.1% 98.2% 98.9% 98.9% 96.5% 98.3% 98.3% 90.0%

O41 Did not attend rate (outpatients) 6.85% 6.57% 6.80% 6.36% 6.36% 6.09% 5.80% 5.72% 6.38% 6.11% 6.32% 6.26% 5.92% 5.92% 7.65%

SUSTAINABILITY

O43 Bank staff - % of all staff pay 7.60% 6.97% 6.92% 7.07% 8.40% 8.99% 7.85% 8.29% 8.12% 7.49% 8.62% 8.46% 8.90% 7.29% 7%

O44 Agency staff - % of all staff pay 5.09% 5.33% 5.58% 5.03% 4.30% 4.51% 3.84% 5.06% 4.28% 4.30% 3.67% 3.96% 3.79% 5.78% 2%

O45 Nurse : occupied bed ratio 1.843 1.767 1.793 1.785 1.850 1.861 1.805 1.774 1.741 1.690 1.760 1.729 1.768 1.820 -

O46 % nurses who are registered 68.44% 68.23% 67.99% 67.78% 67.71% 67.67% 68.40% 68.30% 68.34% 68.49% 68.58% 68.35% 68.25% 68.25% -

O47 % Staff appraised 83.83% 89.33% 89.50% 86.80% 89.11% 88.05% 88.37% 88.20% 87.60% 87.70% 87.00% 86.20% 87.32% 87.32% 90%

O48Sickness Absence: % Sickness(reported one month in arrears)

3.19% 3.17% 3.27% 3.31% 3.20% 3.77% 3.80% 3.60% 3.80% 4.30% 3.58% 3.68% #N/A 3.56% 3.3%

O49 Staff Turnover: Turnover rate (YTD position) 8.46% 8.46% 8.30% 8.10% 8.14% 8.00% 8.24% 8.20% 7.80% 7.70% 7.40% 7.50% 7.48% 7.48% 11%

ACTIVITY

A01 Day Cases 4,395 4,945 4,990 4,707 4,784 4,767 4,900 5,359 4,248 5,056 4,471 4,613 4,599 4,599 65,791

A02 Elective Inpatients 538 624 660 633 580 614 548 589 456 362 484 410 397 397 7,950

A03 Non-elective inpatients 5,537 5,887 5,779 5,765 5,544 5,622 5,814 5,827 5,842 6,076 5,387 6,229 5,936 5,936 74,930

A04 Outpatient First attendances 11,898 13,894 13,731 12,832 12,817 12,859 13,808 13,992 10,732 13,444 11,509 12,483 11,941 11,941 181,895

A05 Outpatient Follow-up attendances 18,524 21,852 21,719 19,668 20,904 20,796 22,271 23,697 18,067 23,174 19,733 20,969 21,068 21,068 277,837

A06 Outpatients with procedure 5,150 6,282 6,111 5,333 6,217 6,521 7,287 7,131 5,196 6,612 6,407 5,948 5,984 5,984 79,490

A07 A&E Attendances 11,569 12,093 11,985 12,531 11,960 11,598 11,734 11,566 11,865 10,648 10,127 11,805 11,766 11,766 155,438

1 National reporting for these performance measures is on a quarterly basis. Data are subject to change up to the final submission deadline due to ongoing data validation and verification.

2 Data are provisional best estimates and will be amended to reflect the position signed-off in the relevant statutory returns in due course.

3 Staff sickness is reported one month in arrears.

4 A&E counting kept consistent with 2017/18 LHE reporting January 2018, following NHSE revised guidance to remove non co-terminous MIU activity and EF type 3 attendances from monthly Trust reporting from January (which is then subsequently reallocated back to the LHE)

Notes

Page 66: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Mark Dennis, Head of Information Servicest: 01903 285273 (ext 85273)

Operational performance scorecard M01.1.Activity Trending Page 3 of 3 Printed 25/05/2018 13:26

Activity Trends

Day Cases Elective Inpatients Non-elective Inpatients

First Outpatients Follow-up Outpatients Outpatients with Procedure

A&E Attendances (age 0-64) A&E Attendances (age 65-84) A&E Attendances (age >85)

Emergency Admissions (age 0-64) Emergency Admissions (age 65-84) Emergency Admissions (age >85)

3,0003,5004,0004,5005,0005,5006,0006,500

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

0100200300400500600700800

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

16,000

17,000

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

15,000

17,000

19,000

21,000

23,000

25,000

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

2,500

3,500

4,500

5,500

6,500

7,500

8,500

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

1,0001,1001,2001,3001,4001,5001,6001,7001,800

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

600650700750800850900950

1,0001,0501,100

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,0002,2002,4002,6002,800

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

2,400

2,600

2,800

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

600

700

800

900

1,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

M01

(Apr

)

M02

(M

ay)

M03

(Ju

n)

M04

(Ju

l)

M05

(Aug

)

M06

(Sep

)

M07

(O

ct)

M08

(N

ov)

M09

(D

ec)

M10

(Ja

n)

M11

(Fe

b)

M12

(M

ar)

2018/19 2017/18 2016/17

Page 67: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

This report can be made available in other formats and in other languages. To discuss your requirements please contact Andy Gray, Company Secretary, on [email protected] or 01903 285288.

To: Board

Date of Meeting: 31st May 2018 Agenda Item: 5.3

Title:

Report on Organisational Development and Workforce performance

Responsible Executive Director

Denise Farmer, Director of OD and Leadership

Prepared by:

Jennie Shore, Human Resources Director

Status:

Disclosable

Summary of Proposal: This report details the Trust’s performance in relation to the supply, development and engagement of its workforce and the organisations culture. Implications for Quality of Care: Provision of high quality, engaged staff has a direct impact on the quality of care. Financial Implications:

Supports good financial performance

Human Resource Implications:

As described

Recommendation The Board is asked to NOTE the report Consultation:

n/a

Appendices: None

Page 68: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

To: Trust Board

Date: May 2018

From: Denise Farmer, Chief Workforce and OD Officer

Agenda Item: 5.3

FOR INFORMATION WORKFORCE AND ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1.00 Introduction 1.01 This sets out the key headlines relating to the Trust’s workforce at 30 April 2018.

2.00 Workforce Capacity 2.01 Budget setting changes are reflected in the workforce scorecard for month 1 resulting in an

overall increase in the budgeted establishment of 103 wte. This includes additional staffing for Apuldram Ward at St Richards Hospital, from April to mid May and then from December to February and the conversion of radiography agency wte to substantive staff. Within paediatrics, there was a small reduction in the establishment following the switch from the winter staffing model to the summer staffing model.

Whilst Balcombe Ward opened as a new medical ward at Worthing Hospital, it did not impact of budgeted establishment because there was a transfer of staff and budget from Burlington Ward.

Adjustments were also made to take account of the transfer of the Orthoptists from the Core to

the Surgery Division. 2.02 The number of substantive staff employed in April fell by 18 wte and is at a broadly similar

position to the same period last year. Conversely investment in our budgeted position has grown by 157 wte, resulting in an increased vacancy factor of 10.5% compared to 8.4% in April 2017.

2.03 Despite the budget increase of £900k in month 1, there was an adverse pay spend of £486.5k.

Medical pay accounted for £334k, representing 5% over budget, and Nursing pay accounted for £183k, representing 2% over budget. Other staff pay was favourable at £30.5k.

2.04 The number of temporary staff used during April increased by circa 34 wte to 731 wte, with

bank staff accounting for this rise. 2.05 Total spend on agency staff in month was £543k. This is an overall reduction of £49k from last

month, with a reduction in medical agency of £106k. 3.00 Workforce Efficiency 3.01 Sickness absence increased during March to 3.7%. This ended 2017/18 with a 12 month

rolling sickness rate of 3.6%. This is a marginal improvement on last year’s absence rate of 3.7% although sickness absence in month in March 2017 was 3.2%.

Page 69: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Page 2 of 7

3.02 With the exception of the Surgery Division, short term absence fell in month to 2.2%. Long term absence continues to vary across divisions ranging from 0.6% in the Corporate division to 2.2% in the Medicine division. Sickness rates within Estates and Facilities are no longer an outlier within the Trust, reflecting the interventions being made to address this in the division.

3.03 At 7.5%, staff turnover remains static for a further month. This compares to 8.2% at the same

time last year. Whilst there is variation across the Trust from 4.3% in the Women and Children’s division to 10.2% in the Core division, retention remains good.

4.00 Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Week 4.01 More than 150 staff and visitors participated in events held across the Trust to celebrate

Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Week between 14-18 May 2018. This included information stands, food tasters and interactive quizzes. 4.02 The new equality and diversity training materials, delivered on the Trust’s Your Health and

Safety days also successfully launched on 14 May. 5.00 NHS Terms and Conditions of Service: Contract Refresh 2018 5.01 A steering group, with representation from divisions and trade unions, has been established to

oversee the implementation of the new contract refresh. This group will meet monthly and has now met to approve the terms of reference, project plan, risk register and agree the content of the staff briefings.

5.02 Over 12 briefings, timed to include night and weekend staff, have been held across the Trust

for staff to understand the proposed changes to the NHS Terms and Conditions of Service. These briefings have been jointly led by HR and trade union colleagues and attendance has been mixed. To date 80 staff have attended.

5.03 It is anticipated that the trade unions will accept the three-year pay deal in early June after

which the NHS Staffs Council will approve the deal and issue pay circulars during July. The 2018/19 element of the pay deal will be backdated to 1 April 2018.

5.04 Further staff briefings are being scheduled during July and August in readiness for

implementation. 6.00 Appraisals 6.01 With the exception of the Medicine division, currently at 80.5% compliance, all divisions have

seen an improvement in the number of staff of have had an appraisal in the last 12 months. Appraisal rates in the Core, Estates and Facilities and Women and Children’s divisions exceed 90%, and the Corporate and Surgery divisions are close at 88.5% and 89.2% respectively.

6.02 94% of medical staff have had an appraisal, with the Women and Children’s division achieving

96%. 7.00 General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) 7.01 The HR policies and processes have been reviewed to ensure compliance with the new

legislation, which comes into effect from 25 May 2018. This includes staff being advised of the privacy notice. All staff are receiving a personally addressed letter, distributed through their line manager, that explains what data the Trust holds about them and how that data is used.

Page 70: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Page 3 of 7

8.00 Statutory and Mandatory Training 8.01 This month the board report data includes data on all nine statutory and mandatory modules.

This will provide greater visibility on all training in future. Attendance on eight out of nine of the modules remains above the Trust’s target of 90%. Attendance on resuscitation is currently below the Trust’s target at 82.7%. This is mainly due to lower attendance rates for Medical staff (65.8%) and certain patient facing staff in Facilities and Estates (e.g. porters). The Learning and Development team is working with the Medical Director and Director of Estates and Facilities to develop an action plan to redress this.

8.02 The DNA rate has slightly decreased from last month and is currently 6.92 (7.27% in March)

but still remains a concern. The DNA rate is due to operational pressures which result in some nursing staff being withdrawn from training at the last minute. This has also impacted on our overall capacity and led to an increase in demand for training places. Additional courses have been organised but this places a cost pressure on the Learning and Development team and the staff who deliver the training.

8.03 The number of staff who have never completed any training is 10, an decrease of 1 since last

month. The majority of those on the list (8) are medical staff who have joined the Trust in the last 6 months and have not completed their mandatory on-line Induction training. This has been escalated to Chiefs/ DDOs and we will continue to work with Divisions to ensure that these individuals complete their training as soon as possible.

9.00 Funding for CPD 9.01 Funding for external CPD training for all staff (except medical staff) is provided by HEE KSS

via the CPD Direct and CPD Indirect (Universities contract) budgets. There has been a delay in HEE KSS confirming CPD budgets for 2018-19. It is hoped that the budgets will be confirmed in June.

However, the delays in funding will result in staff having to delay some professional training, which will impact on their engagement and the smooth running of our Services.

10.0 Widening Participation 10.01 The Levy

The Trust Levy contribution for April 2018 was £95k, with an additional 10% government contribution the total amount entering the Apprentice Service (TAS) Account in April was £1.02M. Payments for apprenticeship qualifications are deducted monthly from the Apprentice Account.

The total spends out of the Levy account for April 2018 was £12.2k.

Our Digital Account balance at 17 May stands at £1,162,401.

Page 71: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Page 4 of 7

10.02 Apprentice starts

Since the 1 April, three new apprentices have started posts in the Trust, with a further five waiting to start pending employment checks. There are currently 14 vacancies at advert or waiting for interview stage.

10.03 Procurement

We are currently in the process of procurement for health care support workers (level 2) and senior health care worker (level 3). These are the qualifications that the clinical support workers will complete. Nine tenders have been received and they are currently being scored.

Health Education Kent Surrey and Sussex are funding an apprentice who will work in procurement and support the provision of apprentice qualifications; this post is currently being advertised.

10.04 Apprentice induction day

On 16 May, the first apprentice induction day took place. Feedback at the end of the day was very positive; the apprentices had no negative comments to make. After a successful day this session will be running for all new starter apprentices once a month every other month at each site.

10.05 Learning at work week

Drop in sessions took place w/c 14th May for both clinical and non-clinical members of staff to give them information on what is available in the Trust to support them with progression. National Numeracy has been released in the Trust; a global email has been requested for the first series of emails to be sent out.

10.06 Health Education Kent, Surrey and Sussex Awards

It was a successful day for the Trust at the Health Education Kent Surrey and Sussex awards held on 3 May and we received the following awards: Runners up: Support workers care awards Emelia Dlugaszek- Compassion and Care Dave Akenhurst- Compassion and Care Paul Berry – Compassion and Care Kirsten Duff – Working above and beyond the call of duty Apprenticeships Lily Morris – L2 Clinical apprentice Charlotte Robinson- L2 Non Clinical apprentice Alice Jalley – L3 Non Clinical Apprentice Employer of the year award- WSHT Winners: Niamh Mulhall – L3 non Clinical Kam Hull – L2 Clinical

Page 72: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Page 5 of 7

10.07 Work Experience

In April, 22 Year 10 students took part in the ‘Introduction to the NHS’ programme at St Richard’s and Worthing Hospitals. The schools who took part were Bishop Luffa, Bourne community college, Chichester High School, The Angmering School, Durrington High School and Sir Woodard Academy This is aimed at students who are interested in a career in the NHS. Each group spent 3 days in the hospital taking part in interactive sessions led by internal staff. The feedback from students included ‘It was a really good/interesting 3 days’, ‘staff were lovely’ and a parent emailed mentioning that her son ‘could not wait to come back and work for the NHS when he is old enough’. On 16 May, two Occupational Therapist’s and two Radiographers volunteered to take part in the ‘Whats my Line’ Activity at Durrington High School. In this activity, the students guess what their job role is by asking a series of questions. The Trust also helped support the Mock interviews for this day.

11.00 Communications and Engagement 11.01 Campaigns

The communications team has continued to work with colleagues from across the trust to provide support for a number of strategic campaigns and initiatives. This includes plans for the 70th anniversary of the NHS this year; go-live of new Pathology laboratory information management system; support for recruitment campaigns; launch and promotion for this year’s Patient First STAR Awards; planning and support of Where Better Never Stops staff conference; and support of staff engagement initiatives, including staff health and wellbeing and the ongoing monthly Wellbeing Wednesdays campaign. The team also organised a royal visit to Southlands Hospital on 8 May for the official opening of the new ophthalmology service at the hospital called Western Sussex Eye Care | Southlands. See below.

11.02 News and social media

The Trust welcomed HRH Countess of Wessex to officially open Western Sussex Eye Care | Southlands on Tuesday 8 May. The event, which was arranged and organised by the communications team, was shared through the Trust’s social media channels (Facebook 5,200 views + 250 reactions, comments and shares | Flicker 1,200 views of online downloadable picture slideshow | Twitter 2,735 impressions) and publicised by local media via a Trust press release. In the same week, the communications team worked with the BBC One Show and facilitated a full day’s filming on 9 May which culminated in chief biomedical scientist Malcolm Robinson being surprised with a BBC One Show Young People’s Care Award for his work founding the charity Harvey’s Gang at Worthing Hospital which now helps unwell youngsters better understand their treatment in more than NHS 40 hospitals nationwide. The communications team used the Trust’s social media channels to help further promote the BBC One Report among our followers (Facebook 3,500 views + 184 reactions, comments and shares). On 21 May, the communications team announced the trust’s CHKS Top Hospital 2018 award by issuing a press release and publishing on the trust’s website, further promoted by social

Page 73: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Page 6 of 7

media. Initial reaction has been very positive, with immediate publication on local newspaper websites and sharing via social media, but at this time evaluation of this good news story is still being monitored. Other recent press releases include the announcement of the chairman’s decision to retire; and the launch announcement and appeal for public nominations for the trust’s annual staff recognition awards. To date, with two weeks left to nominate, nearly 200 nominations have been received for this year’s Patient First STAR Awards. The Trust’s social media audiences continue to grow as the communications team shares more trust news, staff achievements and team successes directly with the public via Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube. Highlights from the previous month include; A&E holiday weekend advice (Facebook 10,000 views); Bank Holiday public health advice (5,500 views); and the Trust penguin sculptures being ready for Royal Wedding (Facebook 4,800).

12.00 Fundraising

12.01 Corporate and Community

The new Mayor of Worthing has selected Love Your Hospital as one of his three chosen charities for his forthcoming year starting from 18 May. Chosen charities typically receive approx. £6,000 each from various fundraising activities. Funds raised will go to benefit children’s services at Worthing Hospital. The newly rebranded Love Your Hospital collection boxes are now being rolled out across our catchment area.

12.02 Direct Marketing

As part of the requisite General Data Protection Regulations compliance, the charity has mailed all of its existing supporters requesting information on contact preferences. The response rate has been in line with expectation and has returned an unexpected income of £1,600. The outcome of this will influence the direct marketing strategy which will be reviewed towards the end of June.

12.03 Marketing

Love Your Hospital participated in the official opening of Western Sussex Eye Care | Southlands by HRH the Countess of Wessex on 8 May. The charity arranged a celebratory cake and presented charity ambassador councillor Jamie Fitzjohn from the £70k Our Vision, Your Sight campaign to HRH. Migration of the Love Your Hospital’s website onto the WordPress platform has been successfully completed. Work on functionality will continue into June with ongoing testing of the new Love Your Hospital lottery sign-up page. Lift wraps (poster designs on lift doors) are due to be installed at both St Richard’s and Worthing Hospitals by the end of May boosting the presence of the charity internally alongside the new collection tins in various locations across all sites.

12.04 Lottery Target

Investment into the lottery is starting to show shoots of growth with the development of lottery

Page 74: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Page 7 of 7

collateral and promotional strategy enabling the introduction of a new recruitment programme throughout 2018/19. Plays to date have risen to 660 each week and we envisage this increasing once lottery online sign-up has been launched publically at the end of May. During 2018/19, sales will be used to benchmark the lottery strategy moving forward.

13.00 RECOMMENDATION The Board is asked to NOTE the report.

Page 75: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

WSHFT WORKFORCE SCORECARD April 2018

Key performance Indicators Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr2018/19

YTDTarget/ Ceiling Amber Limit Trend

1) WORKFORCE CAPACITY NB

Budgeted FTE 6584.8 6586.6 6591.3 6609.3 6610.5 6614.8 6619.1 6619.1 6634.6 6634.6 6634.6 6638.1 6741.1 6741.1 N/A N/A

Total FTE Used 6529.6 6545.0 6632.5 6564.5 6596.5 6560.6 6602.6 6666.4 6597.7 6570.7 6652.4 6669.1 6668.1 6668.1 N/A N/A

Total FTE Used Variance from Budget -55.2 -41.6 41.2 -44.8 -14.0 -54.2 -16.5 47.3 -36.9 -63.9 17.8 31.0 -73.0 N/A N/A N/A

Total FTE Used Vacancy Factor 0.8% 0.6% -0.6% 0.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.2% -0.7% 0.6% 1.0% -0.3% -0.5% 1.1% 1.1% N/A N/A

Substantive Contracted FTE 6033.4 6011.0 6029.2 6011.6 6188.9 6046.9 6062.1 6036.5 6040.4 6037.2 6034.8 6049.1 6031.2 6031.2 N/A N/A

Substantive FTE Worked 5881.5 5870.8 5883.5 5868.5 5888.7 5877.4 5917.9 5922.9 5932.9 5923.9 5939.3 5971.5 5936.8 5936.8 N/A N/A

Substantive FTE Used Vacancy Factor 8.4% 8.7% 8.5% 9.0% 6.4% 8.6% 8.4% 8.8% 9.0% 9.0% 9.0% 8.9% 10.5% 10.5% N/A N/A

Bank Usage As % Of Total FTE Used 7.3% 7.5% 8.6% 8.1% 8.6% 8.4% 8.5% 8.9% 8.4% 7.9% 9.1% 8.8% 9.3% 9.3% N/A N/A

Agency Usage As % Of Total FTE Used 2.6% 2.8% 2.7% 2.5% 2.1% 2.1% 1.9% 2.3% 1.7% 1.9% 1.6% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% N/A N/A

2) WORKFORCE EFFICIENCY NB

Rolling 12 Month Sickness Absence 1 3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.5% 3.6% 3.6% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.6% N/A 3.3% 3.3%

In Month Sickness Absence % 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% 3.3% 3.2% 3.8% 3.8% 3.6% 3.8% 4.3% 3.6% 3.7% 3.6% 3.3% 3.3%

In Month Maternity Leave % 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% N/A N/A

In Month Other Absence % 1.5% 1.8% 1.7% 1.5% 1.2% 1.8% 1.9% 2.2% 1.5% 1.4% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% N/A N/A

In Month Total Absence % 7.1% 7.3% 7.2% 7.2% 6.7% 7.9% 8.1% 8.2% 7.7% 8.1% 7.8% 7.8% 7.6% N/A N/A

Sickness Episodes 1114 1149 1128 1157 1145 1317 1435 1535 1753 1887 1381 1473 N/A

Maternity Heads 189 187 187 199 195 188 196 194 199 198 190 187 N/A N/A N/A

In Month Long Term Sickness Absence % (28 Days Or More) 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.7% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.5% 1.5% N/A N/A

In Month Short Term Sickness Absence % (<28 days) 1.6% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8% 1.6% 2.1% 2.0% 2.2% 2.5% 3.0% 2.3% 2.2% 2.1% N/A N/A

In Month Stress Related Sickness Absence % 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% N/A N/A

In Month Musculo Skeletal Sickness Absence % 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% N/A N/A

Number of Staff breaching Management Triggers for sickness absence 1036 1032 1037 1020 998 995 1009 1016 1026 1047 1028 1029 N/A

% of Staff (headcount) 14.7% 14.7% 14.7% 14.5% 14.2% 14.1% 14.3% 14.4% 14.5% 14.8% 14.6% 14.6% N/A

Rolling 12 Month Turnover 8.2% 8.2% 8.3% 8.1% 8.1% 8.0% 8.2% 8.2% 7.8% 7.7% 7.4% 7.5% 7.5% N/A 8.5% 8.5%

3) TRAINING & PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT NB

% Appraisals Up To Date 83.8% 89.3% 89.5% 86.8% 89.1% 88.1% 88.4% 88.2% 87.6% 87.7% 87.0% 86.2% 87.3% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% In Date - Fire 91.2% 92.1% 92.6% 89.9% 92.2% 92.2% 92.4% 93.0% 92.3% 93.0% 93.4% 93.7% 94.6% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% In Date - Infection Control (Role Specific) 89.6% 90.6% 90.6% 88.2% 90.9% 90.8% 90.8% 91.9% 91.4% 92.2% 92.3% 92.0% 93.1% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% In Date - Back Training (Role Specific) 92.8% 92.9% 93.1% 91.6% 92.3% 92.0% 92.4% 93.8% 93.7% 94.1% 94.1% 94.2% 94.4% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% In Date - Child Protection (Role Specific) 96.5% 96.9% 97.4% 96.0% 96.5% 96.7% 96.9% 97.7% 97.7% 98.0% 98.0% 98.2% 98.1% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% In Date - Information Governance 89.7% 90.3% 90.6% 89.0% 91.1% 91.3% 91.1% 91.9% 91.2% 92.2% 92.1% 91.8% 93.0% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% In Date - Adult Protection 95.9% 96.1% 96.5% 94.7% 95.3% 95.3% 95.4% 96.9% 96.9% 96.7% 96.4% 96.1% 95.7% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% in Date - Equality & Diversity 82.4% 83.9% 84.5% 88.2% 89.5% 90.1% 90.7% 92.3% 92.9% 94.7% 95.0% 95.5% 96.4% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% in Date - Health & Safety 93.7% 94.7% 94.8% 90.2% 90.8% 90.4% 90.4% 91.2% 91.0% 91.0% 91.2% 91.2% 91.3% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

% in Date - Resus 79.8% 80.9% 81.3% 78.5% 80.9% 80.3% 80.6% 81.4% 82.6% 81.3% 81.4% 81.4% 82.1% N/A 90.0% 80.0%

Number of Staff with no mandatory training 6 6 6 8 5 4 5 5 3 3 3 11 8 N/A

Number of Staff > 12 months since any mandatory training 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A

4) REAL-TIME STAFF FEEDBACK NB

Total Respondents To Survey 246 274 386 258 212 300 257 276 239 170 204 288 309 309 N/A N/A

% Respondents who would recommend this trust as a place to work 84.7% 84.3% 84.9% 83.1% 82.5% 84.3% 86.4% 89.8% 85.3% 84.0% 87.7% 85.9% 87.4% 87.4% N/A N/A

% Respondents happy with standard of care if a friend/relative needed treatment 92.9% 90.8% 91.5% 91.6% 92.7% 91.2% 90.8% 94.7% 91.5% 91.1% 93.1% 95.4% 93.9% 93.9% N/A N/A

Overall Staff Engagement Composite Score 3 3.92 3.98 3.98 3.89 3.93 3.88 3.94 3.91 3.91 3.87 3.85 3.93 3.93 N/A 4.02 3.78

Notes:1 Absence data is available one month in arrears.3 Overall indicator for staff engagement is a composite score using 3 key finding questions, friend and family recommendation, motivation and making improvements.3 WSHT Total Respondents To Survey is greater than the sum of the divisional Total Respondents To Survey as some staff did not select a division when completing the survey.3 Baseline Data from 2016 Staff Survey, Overall Staff Engagement Score - 3.88

Page 76: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

This report can be made available in other formats and in other languages. To discuss your requirements please contact Company Secretary, on 01903 285288.

To: Trust Board

Date of Meeting: 31st May 2018 Agenda Item: 5.4

Title Financial Performance - April 2018

Presented by

Karen Geoghegan, Chief Financial Officer

Prepared by

Alison Ingoe, Finance Director; Karen Seabridge, Assistant Director of Finance

Status

Confidential

Summary of Proposal

The Trust reported a deficit of £1.4m, excluding STF at the end of April against a planned deficit of £1.15m. The Trust needs to a deliver a deficit of no more than £0.88m at the end of quarter 1. The Trust is forecasting delivery of the Q1 control total and waiting time trajectories and has accrued STF income on this basis. The Trust is reporting an FSRR rating of '3' in month. This due to the phasing of the financial plan and the small adverse variance on in-month performance. This is forecast to be recovered in Q1. The Financial Performance paper provides further detail on the Trust’s financial position.

Implications for Quality of Care

Financial planning principles have been established to ensure that expenditure budgets reflect anticipated activity levels and that agreed staffing levels are maintained.

Support for/integration with Corporate Objectives and Strategies

G1. Maintain an acceptable financial risk rating

Financial Implications

These are noted within the Financial Performance Report

Human Resource Implications

N/A

Recommendation The Board is asked to NOTE the Financial Performance Report for April 2018.

Consultation

N/A

Appendices

Financial Performance Report

Page 77: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19

Summary

SOF Finance Rating A Control Total (exc STF) Surplus £k A Premium Pay Spend £k G

Plan Actual / Forecast Plan Actual / Forecast Plan Actual

Year to Date 2 3 Year to Date £k (1,147) (1,398) Agency Ceiling (YTD) £k 1,357 925

Year End Forecast 1 1 Year End Forecast £k 1,185 1,185 WLI Payments (YTD) £k 147 173

Total Premium Pay (YTD) £k 1,503 1,098

Income £k A Operating Costs £k A Agency Ceiling £k G

Plan Actual / Forecast Plan Actual / Forecast Plan Actual/Forecast

Year to Date £k 35,519 34,884 Year to Date £k (34,697) (34,493) Year to Date £k 1,357 925

Year End Forecast 434,620 434,620 Year End Forecast £k (409,805) (409,805) Year End Forecast £k 14,969 12,720

Cash £k A Capital £k G Efficiency and Transformation Programme £k G

Plan Actual Plan Actual / Forecast Plan Actual / Forecast

Year to Date £k 6,174 7,271 Year to Date £k 709 283 Year to Date £k 929 955

Year End Forecast £k 16,974 16,974 Year End Forecast £k 17,145 17,145 Year End Forecast £k 18,235 18,235

Key Risks:

1. The Trust has agreed 2018/19 activity and income on an aligned incentives (AIC) basis with its main commissioner, Coastal West Sussex CCG. Although the AIC approach has improved joint working between the Trust and CWS CCG, this is still in its early

stages and governance arrangements are not yet fully embedded. The ability to progress and resolve issues remains a risk.

2. Reducing premium staffing costs remains a significant challenge. Although the Trust has seen some successes in reducing agency expenditure within nursing, in other areas costs have increased, predominantly within medical staff. A medical workforce action

group with Director leadership has been established to provide oversight and focus in this area.

3. The financial plan for 2018/19 and reported performance are based on an assumed 1% pay uplift. A national pay award, which proposes increases in excess of this, is currently being consulted upon. Any increased pay award is expected to fully funded centrally

and therefore should not impact on the Trust's financial performance. The Trust has established a working group to oversee the implementation of contract changes and to monitor and manage any financial impact.

4. Alignment of capacity to non-elective and elective activity levels and responsiveness to changes in levels of demand. Close management of capacity and flow will be required.

The Trust reported a deficit of £1.4m, excluding STF at the end of April against a planned deficit of £1.15m. The Trust needs to a deliver a deficit of no more than £0.88m at the end of quarter 1. The Trust is forecasting delivery of the Q1 control total and waiting

time trajectories and has accrued STF income on this basis. The Trust is reporting an FSRR rating of '3' in month. This due to the phasing of the financial plan and the small adverse variance on in-month performance. This is forecast to be recovered in Q1.

The Trust is reporting an FSRR rating of '3' in month. This due to the phasing of the

financial plan and the small adverse variance on in-month performance. This is

forecast to be recovered in Q1.

At the end of April, the Trust is reporting a deficit of £1.4m excluding STF which was

£0.25m adverse to the planned positions. Elective activity was below plan in month but

was partially offset by higher non-elective activity levels. Operational pressures in April

led to additional capacity being opened which resulting in high premium pay costs.

Premium pay expenditure at the end of April is £0.4m below the target level, this is due

to agency spend reporting a £0.43m favorable variance to the ceiling level. Waiting List

Initiative payments remained at a similar level to March and were above plan by

£0.03m.

Cumulatively income is £0.6m behind plan. Non-elective admissions were above plan

but this was offset by lower than plan elective activity. Income from high cost drugs

and devices was £0.4m lower than plan. Private patient income remains behind plan

year to date.

Operating costs are below plan by £0.2m in M1, however, this includes reduced

expenditure on high cost drugs and devices which are £0.4m below plan. Pay is £0.3m

above plan with nursing and medical pay both above plan. Lower clinical supplies and

services costs were incurred in non pay linked to reduced Elective activity levels.

The agency ceiling has reduced to £14.9m in 2018/19. Agency expenditure has

maintained a similar run rate to 2017/18 and was £0.4m below the ceiling target.

At the end of April the cash position is ahead of plan by £1.1m. This is primarily due to

lower than plan capital expenditure in month and a favourable movement on working

capital.

Capital expenditure totalled £0.28m at the end of April which is £0.4m lower than plan.

The slippage is expected to be recovered as projects come on stream and forecast for

the year is in line with plan.

Year-to-date savings of £0.96m have been achieved against a plan of £0.93m. This

reflects the deferral of £30k of CNST related spend from M1 to M2.

Page 78: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 SOF Finance Rating A

Plan Plan Actual Actual

YTD Metric Rating Metric Rating

Capital Service Capacity 2.1 2 1.8 2

Liquidity (6.5) 2 (7.0) 3

I&E Margin (0.9)% 3 (1.6)% 4

Distance from Financial Plan 0.0% 1 (0.7)% 2

Agency Spend (9.8)% 1 (31.8)% 1

2018/19 Finance Rating 2 3

Area Weighting1

(best)

2 3 4

(worst)

Financial

Efficiency

Financial

Controls

20%

YTD Planned I&E Surplus/Deficit

Agency CeilingYTD Actual Agency Ceiling - YTD Planned Agency Ceiling

0% 25% 50% ≥50% 20%YTD Planned Agency Ceiling

Distance from Financial Plan YTD Actual I&E Surplus/Deficit - YTD Planned I&E Surplus/Deficit 0% (1)% (2)% ≤(2)%

(1)% ≤(1)% 20%0%

<1.25x 20%Annual debt service

Liquidity DaysWorking capital balance x 360

0.0 (7.0) (14.0) <(14.0) 20%

Total Operating and Non Op Income

Annual operating expenses

I&E MarginI&E Surplus or deficit

1%

At the end of April, the finance rating is a '3'. The deficit plan for April had caused the planned I&E margin metric to fall to a '3'. The small adverse variance in April has caused this metric to reduce to a '4' which

has limited the overall rating to a '3'. It is forecast that this will be recovered in Q1.

Metric Construction Rating

Financial

Sustainability

Capital Service Capacity Revenue available for capital service 2.5x 1.75x 1.25x

Page 79: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Surplus A

Plan Actual Variance Plan Forecast Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k

Surplus (Deficit) including STF (1,147) (1,398) (251) Surplus (Deficit) 1,185 1,185 (0)

less Sustainability and Transformation Fund 813 813 - less Sustainability and Transformation Fund 16,252 16,252 -

Underlying Performance against Control Total excluding STF (335) (586) (251) Underlying Performance against Control Total excluding STF 17,437 17,437 (0)

Prev Yr Actual Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k £k

Income 33,630 35,519 34,884 (634) Income 434,621 434,620 (0)

Pay (23,870) (24,159) (24,468) (309) Pay (287,999) (287,735) 264

Non-Pay (tariff) (7,086) (7,611) (7,516) 94 Non-Pay (tariff) (90,954) (91,174) (219)

Non-Pay (PbR exc) (2,694) (2,928) (2,508) 419 Non-Pay (PbR exc) (30,851) (30,896) (45)

EBITDA * (20) 822 392 (430) EBITDA * 24,816 24,816 (0)

Profit / Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets (0) - - - Profit / Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets - - -

Interest Payable (78) (48) 51 99 Interest Payable (586) (586) -

Interest Receivable 2 2 4 2 Interest Receivable 24 24 -

Depreciation (1,041) (1,220) (1,219) 0 Depreciation (14,630) (14,630) -

Impairments - - - - Impairments - - -

Public Dividend Capital Dividend (649) (702) (702) 0 Public Dividend Capital Dividend (8,425) (8,425) -

Net Surplus / (Deficit) (1,786) (1,146) (1,475) (329) Net Surplus / (Deficit) 1,199 1,199 (0)

less: Impairment - - - - less: Impairment - - -

Retained Surplus/(Deficit) (1,786) (1,146) (1,475) (329) Retained Surplus/(Deficit) 1,199 1,199 (0)

Donated Assets (50) (78) - 78 Donated Assets (937) (937) -

Donated Asset Depreciation and Amortisation 77 77 77 0 Donated Asset Depreciation and Amortisation 923 923 -

less Profit/Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets 0 - - - less Profit/Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets - - -

Control Total excluding STF (1,759) (1,147) (1,398) (251) Control Total excluding STF 1,185 1,185 (0)

add Sustainability and Transformation Fund (578) 813 813 - add Sustainability and Transformation Fund 16,252 16,252 -

Control Total including STF (2,337) (335) (586) (251) Control Total including STF 17,437 17,437 (0)

* EBITDA Earnings before Interest Taxation Depreciation and Amortisation

At the end of April the Trust reported a deficit of £1.4m, excluding STF, this was against a planned deficit of £1.15m. Elective activity was below plan in month but was partially offset by higher non-elective activity levels. Operational pressures in April led to additional capacity being opened which

resulting in high premium pay costs.

Year To Date Year Forecast

In aggregate contract income in April was £0.4m behind plan although this includes under-performance of £0.4m in relation to PbR excluded items. Non Elective activity continued at levels seen in Q4 but Elective activity delivered below plan predominantly within Trauma & Orthopaedics.

Pay continued at the higher levels seen in Q4 and is £0.3m above plan driven predominantly by Medical and Nursing. Medical staff continue to use high levels of locum and agency staff to cover sickness, vacancy and emergency department pressures. Increased recruitment of substantive staff within

Nursing did not lead to reduced temporary staffing usage as additional bed capacity was opened in April due to higher than planned non-elective activity. Continued management of vacancies within corporate areas helped mitigate the pressures within the clinical divisions.

Non Pay expenditure decreased in comparison to March by £0.2m and was £0.5m favourable to plan, the majority of which related to PbR exclusions which are matched with income. Clinical supplies and services were favourable to plan as a result of reduced activity levels in Orthopaedics.

Year to Date Full Year

(2,000)

(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar£0

00

s

Cumulative Control Total by Month

Budget

Actual

(2,000)

(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar£0

00

s

Control Total by Month

Budget

Actual

Page 80: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Sustainability and Transformation Fund A

Actual Actual Actual

Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2017/18

Plan £000s (1,147) (1,289) (884) (884) 177 549 1,185 1,185

Actual £000s (1,398) 0 0 0 0 0

Eligible for STF Funding

STF Income Available £000s 813 1,626 2,438 2,438 5,688 10,564 16,252 16,252

Achieved? No

Income 70.0% 0 1,707 3,982 7,395 11,376 11,376

Achieved? Yes

Income 30.0% 0 731 1,706 3,169 4,876 4,876

Achieved? No

Income 0.0% 0 0

Achieved? Yes

Income 0.0% 0 0

Total STF Income Achieved (£000s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

At the end of M1, the Trust is behind its financial control total trajectory by £251k. The Trust needs to deliver a deficit of more than £0.9m in order to be eligible to earn STF. The Trust is

forecasting delivery of the quarterly control total and have accrued STF income on this basis.

A&E waiting times in M1 were below the constitutional target but above the STF trajectory and STF income has been accrued on this basis.

Financial Control Total (exc STF)

Delivery of Financial Control Total

A&E Waiting Times

RTT

Cancer

Page 81: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Income A

Year To Date Year End Forecast

Prev Yr. Actual Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k £k

Total Income 33,630 35,519 34,884 (634) Total Income 434,620 434,620 0

Prev Yr Actual Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

Income £k £k £k £k Income £k £k £k

Coastal West Sussex 23,237 25,269 25,269 0 Coastal West Sussex 315,981 315,981 0

Other Clinical Commissioning Groups 1,288 1,629 1,548 (81) Other Clinical Commissioning Groups 20,337 20,337 0

Specialist LAT 3,871 4,105 3,763 (342) Specialist LAT 47,048 47,048 0

WSCC - Sexual Health 398 452 425 (27) WSCC - Sexual Health 5,420 5,420 0

NCA 558 262 398 136 NCA 3,774 3,774 0

Other Trust Income 732 (4) (74) (69) Other Trust Income (54) (54) 0

Income From Activities 30,083 31,713 31,330 (383) Income From Activities 392,506 392,506 0

Private Patients 467 673 490 (183) Private Patients 7,082 7,082 0

Education, Training and Research 1,254 1,229 1,229 0 Education, Training and Research 14,847 14,847 0

Donated Asset / Grant  Income 50 78 0 (78) Donated Asset Income 937 937 0

Other Income 1,776 1,825 1,835 10 Other Income 19,248 19,248 0

Other Operating Income 3,547 3,806 3,554 (251) Other Operating Income 42,114 42,114 0

 Total Income 33,630 35,519 34,884 (634)  Total Income 434,620 434,620 0

Sustainability and Transformation Funding

(STF) 579 813 813 0

Sustainability and Transformation Funding

(STF) 16,252 16,252 0

Total Income including STF 34,209 36,331 35,697 (634) Total Income including STF 450,872 450,872 0

of which : PbR Drugs/Devices 2,694 2,928 2,508 (419)

Year to Date Full Year

Total income is £0.6m behind plan at the end of April of which £0.4m relates to income from activities. Private patient activity is behind due to lower activity levels in month which is partially due to the high volumes of non-elective

patients particularly in the early half of the month.

Elective activity and income were behibnd plan in M1 which was partially offset by increased non-elective admissions. There was a reduction in PbR excluded drugs spend and associated income this month.

Private patient income is behind plan in April. Donated asset income is behind plan, however this is excluded from the calculation of the control total.

33,500

34,000

34,500

35,000

35,500

36,000

36,500

37,000

37,500

38,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

£0

00

Monthly Income

Budget Actual

25,000

27,000

29,000

31,000

33,000

35,000

37,000

39,000

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar

£0

00

Monthly Income Yearly Comparison

2017-18 2018-19

Page 82: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Contract Performance A

Table 2. Activity and Income by Point of Delivery

Point of Delivery YTD Plan YTD Actual YTD Var YTD Plan YTD Actual YTD Var

FYE Plan YTD Plan YTD Actual YTD Var Daycases 4,705 4,599 (106) 2,870 2,841 (29)

Coastal West Sussex 315,981 25,269 25,269 - Elective Spells 574 397 (177) 1,924 1,238 (686)

Other CCG Acute contracts 20,337 1,629 1,548 (81) Elective Excess Bed days 59 60 1 15 15 0

NHS England 47,048 4,105 3,763 (342) Non Elective Spells 4,646 4,835 189 10,156 10,721 565

Integrated Sexual Health Services 5,420 452 425 (27) Non Elective short-stay 1,046 1,101 55 785 832 47

Non Contract Activity 3,774 262 398 136 Non Elective Excess Bed days 1,130 824 (306) 287 246 (41)

Outpatients 49,305 47,420 (1,885) 5,214 4,950 (264)

Total 392,560 31,718 31,403 (314) A&E 11,455 11,766 311 1,486 1,593 107

PbR exclusions 2,929 2,508 (420)

NB: Variances are reported against Western Sussex Hospitals Planned Income Levels Critical Care 1,004 1,021 18

Maternity Pathway 888 766 (122)

OP Diagnostic Imaging 620 642 22

Sexual Health 441 415 (26)

Direct Access Pathology 814 867 53

Other Direct Access (Imaging and Dietetics) 177 196 19

Other 1,531 1,981 450

CQUIN 578 572 (6)

Total 31,718 31,403 (314)

Table 3. - Reconciliation to Income Reporting Table 4. Contract Income by CCG and NHS England

£000s

FYE Plan YTD Plan YTD Actual SUSSEX CCGs and NHS ENGLAND

Contract Monitoring Performance 385,719 31,139 30,831 YTD Plan YTD Actual YTD Var

CQUIN 2.0% 6,841 578 572 NHS COASTAL WEST SUSSEX CCG 25,269 25,269 0

Total Contracted Income 392,560 31,718 31,403 NHS HORSHAM AND MID SUSSEX CCG 472 327 (145)

NHS BRIGHTON AND HOVE CCG 399 518 119

Income Recharged non-contract NHS HIGH WEALD LEWES HAVENS CCG 34 19 (15)

NHS CRAWLEY CCG 31 20 (11)

NHS EASTBOURNE, HAILSHAM AND SEAFORD CCG 48 90 42

Maternity pathway payment (197) (16) (22) NHS HASTINGS AND ROTHER CCG 2 18 16

Cystic Fibrosis 146 12 17 NHS SOUTH EASTERN HAMPSHIRE CCG 531 463 (68)

Other invoicing 0 0 0 NHS PORTSMOUTH CCG 57 51 (6)

Work-in-progress adjustment 0 0 (69) NHS FAREHAM AND GOSPORT CCG 29 12 (17)

NHS GUILDFORD AND WAVERLEY CCG 26 30 4

Total Income from Activities 392,509 31,713 31,330 Subtotal CCG Acute Contracts 26,898 26,817 (81)

Strategic Transformation Fund 16,252 813 813 NHS England 4,105 3,763 (342)

Total 31,003 30,580 (423)

Total Income from Activities plus STF 408,761 32,526 32,142

£'000

Estimated Values YTD (inc CQUIN)

The Trust reports income based on the contract monitoring position for prior months and an estimate of income for the current month based on priced and coded activity in the month as available. An estimate is made for the value of uncoded spells and missing days and included within the reported income position.

1) Context

The Trust signed two-year contracts with all of its major commissioners in 2017/18. The Trust has agreed contract envelopes for 2018/19 with its major commissioners that are in line with the anticipated values in the financial plan.

2) YTD Report

Trust internal monitoring information shows underperformance against the Trust's main CCG contract.

It is important to note that the performance indicated is compared to the Trust's plan and does not necessarily reflect the over-performance against commissioner contracts.

£'000

Activity Volumes £'000

Table 1. Total Financial Values by Contract

This table represents the Trusts assessment of the performance against commissioners only with whom a Contract SLA has been agreed. There are some differences between the Trust's income plan and the agreed contract values due to QIPP assumptions

Page 6

Page 83: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Operating Costs A

Prev Yr Actual Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k

Pay (23,870) (24,159) (24,468) (309) Pay (287,999) (287,735) 264

Non Pay (9,780) (10,538) (10,025) 513 Non Pay (121,805) (122,069) (264)

Operational Costs (33,650) (34,697) (34,493) 204 Operational Costs (409,805) (409,805) (0)

Prep Yr. Actual Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k £k

Pay Pay

Management & Admin (3,327) (3,456) (3,366) 90 Management & Admin (41,997) (41,304) 693

Medical and Dental Staff (6,695) (6,915) (7,120) (205) Medical and Dental Staff (79,023) (80,317) (1,294)

Nursing & Midwifery (9,323) (9,000) (9,161) (161) Nursing & Midwifery (107,730) (108,288) (557)

Other Healthcare (3,246) (3,318) (3,346) (29) Other Healthcare (38,591) (39,555) (963)

Estates (1,279) (1,305) (1,305) (0) Estates (15,562) (16,244) (682)

Other Staff - (165) (169) (4) Other Staff (5,096) (2,028) 3,068

 Total Pay (23,870) (24,159) (24,468) (309)  Total Pay (287,999) (287,735) 264

Non-Pay Non-Pay

Services from Other NHS Bodies (204) (221) (226) (5) Services from Other NHS Bodies (2,570) (2,714) (144)

Purchase of Healthcare from Non NHS Bodies (205) (143) (155) (12) Purchase of Healthcare from Non NHS Bodies (1,546) (1,865) (319)

Drugs & Medical Gases - tariff (872) (1,039) (1,140) (101) Drugs & Medical Gases (12,757) (13,680) (923)

Drugs & Medical Gases - PbR excluded (2,318) (2,437) (1,961) 476 Drugs & Medical Gases - PbR excluded (22,370) (23,538) (1,168)

Drugs & Medical Gases - Cancer Drug Fund (148) (172) (210) (38) Drugs & Medical Gases - Cancer Drug Fund (4,863) (3,311) 1,552

Supplies and Services - Clinical (2,563) (2,750) (2,595) 154 Supplies and Services - Clinical (33,619) (33,346) 273

Supplies and Services - Clinical PbR Excluded (228) (319) (337) (19) Supplies and Services - Clinical PbR Excluded (3,619) (4,047) (429)

Supplies and Services - General (346) (289) (295) (6) Supplies and Services - General (3,524) (3,542) (18)

Establishment Expenses (538) (455) (432) 23 Establishment Expenses (5,424) (5,179) 246

Premises (1,339) (1,372) (1,322) 50 Premises (16,275) (15,868) 407

Education and Training (56) (100) (68) 32 Education and Training (1,200) (815) 384

Clinical Negligence Premium (841) (1,147) (1,147) 1 Clinical Negligence Premium (13,351) (13,351) 0

Other Non-Pay (122) (94) (136) (41) Other Non-Pay (689) (814) (125)

 Total Non-Pay (9,780) (10,538) (10,025) 513  Total Non-Pay (121,805) (122,069) (264)

Total Expenditure (33,650) (34,697) (34,493) 204 Total Expenditure (409,805) (409,805) (0)

Year To Date Year Forecast

Pay: In aggregate Medical pay decreased by £0.1m in comparison with March with reductions in both substantive and agency expenditure, however costs remained above plan for locum staff which were used to cover junior doctor sickness and vacancies in Emergency medical areas.

Nursing pay expenditure increased within substantive staff following increased recruitment without an offsetting reduction in agency expenditure due additional capacity that was open April. Estates staff increased in comparison to March following recruitment within a number of departments

but remained within plan. Other staff groups continued to hold a number of vacancies mitigating pressures in clinical areas.

Non Pay: High cost drug usage decreased in April compared to March and was significantly below plan as a result of reduced levels of elective activity undertaken in month, this decrease was offset by income. These low activity levels also impacting on reduced clinical supplies and

services expenditure in a number of surgical areas.

Operating costs are below plan by £0.2m in M1, however, this includes reduced expenditure on high cost drugs and devices which are £0.4m below plan. Income is received for these items and so there is no net gain to the Trust from the underspend. The underlying position on operating

costs is £0.2m adverse which comprises £0.3m overspend on pay offset by £0.1m favourable variance on non-pay.

Year to Date Full Year

23,000

23,500

24,000

24,500

25,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

£0

00

s

Monthly Pay

Budget Actual

32,500

33,000

33,500

34,000

34,500

35,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

£0

00

s

Monthly Operating Costs

Budget Actual

9,000

9,500

10,000

10,500

11,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

£0

00

s Monthly Non Pay

Budget Actual

21,000

22,000

23,000

24,000

25,000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

£0

00

s

Monthly Pay Yearly Comparison

2017-18 2018-19

Page 84: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 A

Agency Waiting List Initiative Payments

2016/17 2017/18 Ceiling Actual Variance1) Context

£k £k £k £k £k Budget Actual Variance

Medical and Dental Staff (7,031) (6,936) (754) (538) 216 Division

Nursing & Midwifery (9,283) (4,412) (500) (234) 266 Surgery (87) (62) 25

Other Healthcare (2,197) (1,405) (103) (118) (16) Medicine (4) (26) (22)

Management & Admin (195) (113) - (19) (19) Core (60) (75) (15)

Estates (182) (8) - (15) (15) Women & Children (1) (8) (7)

- Corporate 5 (1) (6)

(18,887) (12,873) (1,357) (925) 431 (147) (173) (26)

Medical Locum

Budget Actual Variance

Division

Surgery (11) (91) (80)

Medicine (1) (512) (511)

Core (42) (29) 13

Women & Children (11) (80) (69)

Corporate (2) (4) (2)

(68) (717) (649)

Payroll Staff in post incl Bank Year To Date

Prev Yr Actual Plan Actual Variance Prev Yr Actual Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k WTE WTE WTE WTE

Medical and Dental Staff (6,108) (6,297) (5,720) 577 711 816 827 (11)

Nursing & Midwifery (8,768) (8,883) (8,916) (33) 2,706 2,850 2,814 37

Other Healthcare (3,172) (3,289) (3,213) 76 1,002 1,076 1,001 76

Management & Admin (3,327) (3,451) (3,346) 105 1,294 1,326 1,294 32

Estates (1,279) (1,302) (1,290) 13 613 667 619 48

Other Staff - (165) (169) (4) - - - -

(22,655) (23,388) (22,653) 734 6,326 6,736 6,554 182

Year To Date

Payroll & Premium Pay Costs

Year To Date

Year to Date

Year to Date

500

700

900

1,100

1,300

1,500

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M7

M8

M9

M1

0

M1

1

M1

2

£0

00

s

Agency Expenditure Comparison

Agency Ceiling Agency Spend

Page 85: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Divisional Performance R

Year To Date Year To Date Year To Date

PY Actual Plan Actual Variance RAG PY Actual Plan Actual Variance RAG PY Actual Plan Actual Variance RAG

£k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k

Contract Income 7,499 8,143 7,515 (628) R Contract Income 13,011 14,022 13,978 (44) R Contract Income 3,288 3,594 3,627 33 G

Other Income 195 199 223 23 G Other Income 245 241 226 (15) R Other Income 953 989 995 6 G

Total Income 7,695 8,342 7,738 (604) R Total Income 13,257 14,263 14,204 (59) R Total Income 4,241 4,583 4,622 39 G

Pay (5,319) (5,303) (5,294) 9 G Pay (7,724) (7,482) (7,785) (303) R Pay (4,654) (4,655) (4,659) (4) R

Non Pay (1,614) (1,684) (1,672) 13 G Non Pay (2,947) (3,115) (2,954) 161 G Non Pay (1,981) (1,993) (1,929) 64 G

Total Expenditure (6,933) (6,987) (6,966) 22 G Total Expenditure (10,671) (10,597) (10,739) (142) R Total Expenditure (6,635) (6,648) (6,588) 60 G

EBITDA Surplus/(Deficit) 761 1,355 772 (583) R EBITDA Surplus/(Deficit) 2,585 3,666 3,465 (201) R EBITDA Surplus/(Deficit) (2,393) (2,065) (1,967) 98 G

Contribution 10% 16% 10% Contribution 20% 26% 24% Contribution (56%) (45%) (43%)

Year To Date Year To Date

PY Actual Plan Actual Variance RAG PY Actual Plan Actual Variance RAG PY Actual Plan Actual Variance RAG

£k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k £k

Contract Income 4,943 5,316 5,092 (224) R Contract Income 0 - - - Contract Income - 638 1,118 480 G

Other Income 67 70 71 1 G Other Income 387 395 366 (30) R Other Income 1,336 1,911 1,674 (237) R

Total Income 5,011 5,386 5,163 (223) R Total Income 387 395 366 (30) R Total Income 1,336 2,548 2,792 244 G

Pay (2,590) (2,625) (2,774) (150) R Pay (1,279) (1,306) (1,279) 28 G Pay (2,255) (2,788) (2,678) 111 G

Non Pay (966) (1,144) (1,051) 93 G Non Pay (1,222) (1,252) (1,209) 43 G Non Pay (1,164) (1,350) (1,209) 141 G

Total Expenditure (3,556) (3,769) (3,826) (57) R Total Expenditure (2,501) (2,558) (2,488) 70 G Total Expenditure (3,419) (4,138) (3,886) 252 G

EBITDA Surplus/(Deficit) 1,455 1,618 1,337 (280) R EBITDA Surplus/(Deficit) (2,114) (2,163) (2,122) 41 G EBITDA Surplus/(Deficit) (2,083) (1,590) (1,094) 496 G

Contribution 29% 30% 26%

Surgery: Elective activity was below plan in month, with significant under-performance in

Trauma and Orthopaedics. Some of this was due to constraints on bed capacity, however,

outpatient activity was also low in this specialty which impacted activity in the earlier half of the

month. Pay was favourable to plan and in line with 17/18 run rate. This was as a result of

reduced WLI spend, particularly within Orthopaedics and Head & Neck services. Non pay

reflected significant reductions in clinical supplies in relation to reduced spend on prostheses.

Corporate: Private patient income has decreased in comparison to March as activity continues

to be compromised by provision of beds for NHS patients. This has reduced planned activity

and also led to some short term cancellations. Corporate departments were cumulatively

underspent due to the impact of vacancy control and discretionary spend controls which remain

in place.

Medicine: Devolved income is close to plan with high cardiac activity offset by low PbR

exclusion income. Premium costs incurred for medical staff covering maternity leave and

vacancies have been incurred in addition to non recurrent pay arrears and additional costs to

support increased emergency admissions and high Cardiac activity. Nursing expenditure is

also above plan as a result of unplanned increased capacity at the Worthing site and patient

flow pressures on the wards and within A&E. Activity above plan in several specialties has

driven increased consumable costs although this has been offset within non pay by reduced

expenditure on higher cost 'PbR Excluded' drugs and consumables, the offset to which is

within income.

Core: Overall the Division is favourable to plan for both its delegated budget and devolved

income. Premium agency costs for medical imaging due to national shortages of Allied Health

Professional staff alongside an increase in diagnostic imaging activity, have resulted in pay

costs being above plan in April. This inability to fully recruit Consultants has also had an impact

within non pay as medical imaging reporting is being outsourced to meet regulatory targets. In

aggregate non-pay is under plan as a result of seasonal reduced levels of pathology testing

linked to low levels of elective and outpatient activity within the month.

Year To Date

Women & Children: Maternity activity was below plan in April, with fewer births than

expected. Neonatal activity and income was also lower than planned, but offset by high activity

and acuity in paediatrics, most significantly in non elective care. The care needs of these

paediatric patients resulted in additional nursing costs including agency mental health nurses.

Premium spend in medical staffing was also required to cover vacancies and maternity leave

in Obstetrics and Paediatrics, leading to an overall adverse pay position.

Facilities & Estates: The division was favourable to plan in April, largely as a result of lower

than expected utilities costs following an unseasonably warm month. Pay was also favourable

to plan due to delays in recruitment to management posts and vacancies in estates and

catering staff groups. Car parking income increased compared to the same month the previous

year, however, was below plan at St Richards following an increase in tariff but a reduction in

average length of stay.

Page 86: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19

Plan Actual Variance Notes Plan Actual Variance Notes

£k £k £k £k £k £k

Property, Plant and Equipment 270,830 278,976 8,146 1 Property, Plant and Equipment 269,850 269,850 -

Intangible Assets 6,616 6,684 68 Intangible Assets 6,616 6,616 -

Other Assets - - - Other Assets - - -

Non Current Assets 277,446 285,660 8,214 Non Current Assets 276,466 276,466 -

Inventories 6,307 6,785 478 Inventories 6,450 6,450 -

Trade, Other Receivables, Other Current Assets 34,964 34,166 (798) Trade, Other Receivables, Other Current Assets 47,569 47,569 -

Cash and Cash Equivalents 6,174 7,271 1,097 Cash and Cash Equivalents 16,974 16,974 -

Non Current Assets Held for Sale - - - Non Current Assets Held for Sale - - -

Current Assets 47,445 48,222 777 Current Assets 70,993 70,993 -

Trade and Other Payables (26,011) (27,579) (1,568) 2 Trade and Other Payables (28,030) (28,030) -

Borrowings (2,198) (2,397) (199) Borrowings (2,198) (2,198) -

Other Financial Liabilities (17,898) (17,898) - Other Financial Liabilities (17,196) (17,196) -

Provisions (255) (207) 48 Provisions (559) (559) -

Other Liabilities (2,314) (2,197) 117 Other Liabilities (2,795) (2,795) -

Current Liabilities (48,676) (50,278) (1,602) Current Liabilities (50,778) (50,778) -

Borrowings (20,536) (20,529) 7 Borrowings (18,378) (18,378) -

Trade and Other Payables - - - Trade and Other Payables - - -

Provisions (2,931) (2,958) (27) Provisions (2,627) (2,627) -

TOTAL ASSETS EMPLOYED 252,748 260,116 7,368

TOTAL ASSETS EMPLOYED

275,676 275,676 -

Financed by: Financed by:

Public Dividend Capital 240,844 240,844 0 Public Dividend Capital 240,844 240,844 -

Retained Earnings (36,814) (37,974) (1,160) Retained Earnings (9,886) (9,886) -

Surplus/(Deficit) for Year - - - (Surplus)/Deficit for Year - - -

Revaluation Reserve 48,718 57,245 8,527 Revaluation Reserve 44,718 44,718 -

TOTAL TAXPAYERS EQUITY

252,748 260,116 7,368

TOTAL TAXPAYERS EQUITY

275,676 275,676 -

The Trust Balance Sheet is produced on a monthly basis, and reflects changes in the asset values, as well as movement in liabilities.

Year to Date Full Year Forecast

1. The non current asset position includes the interim impact of the District Valuer's valuation. This will be updated when the 2017/18 accounts are approved.

2. Trade payables are higher than plan due to the Trust's cash position necessitating the restriction of supplier payments in 2017/18.

Statement of Financial Position

Page 87: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Cash G

Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k

Cash Balance 6,174 7,271 1,097 16,974 16,974 -

Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k

EBITDA 1,565 1,209 (356) EBITDA 40,257 40,257 -

Movement in Working Capital (1,160) (129) 1,031 Movement in Working Capital (1,403) (1,403) -

Provisions - (30) (30) Provisions - - -

Cashflow from Operations 405 1,049 644 Cashflow from Operations 38,854 38,854 -

Capital Expenditure (712) (283) 429 Capital Expenditure (17,145) (17,145) -

Cash receipt from asset sales - - - Cash receipt from asset sales - - -

Cashflow before financing (307) 766 1,073 Cashflow before financing 21,709 21,709 -

PDC Received - 0 0 PDC Received - 0 0

PDC Repaid - - - PDC Repaid (8,425) (8,425) -

Dividends Paid - (0) (0) Dividends Paid - -

Interest on Loans and leases (57) - 57 Interest on Loans and leases (690) (690) -

Interest received - 4 4 Interest received - - -

Donations received in cash - - - Donations received in cash - - -

Drawdown on debt - - - Drawdown on debt - - -

Repayment of debt - (37) (37) Repayment of debt (2,158) (2,158) -

Cashflow from financing (57) (33) 24 Cashflow from financing (11,273) (11,273) 0

Net Cash Inflow / (Outflow) (364) 733 1,097 Net Cash Inflow / (Outflow) 10,436 10,436 0

Opening Cash Balance 6,538 6,538 0 Opening Cash Balance 6,538 6,538 -

Closing Cash Balance 6,174 7,271 1,097 Closing Cash Balance 16,974 16,974 0

At the end of April the cash position is ahead of plan by £1.1m. This is primarily due to lower than plan capital expenditure in month and a favourable movement on working capital. The movement in working capital is due to

lower levels of accrued income and prepayments.

Year to Date Full Year

Year To Date Full Year Forecast

Page 88: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Aged Debtors

1-30 days31-60

days

61-90

days> 90 days

£k £k £k £k £k £k

CCG's (4,811) 621 138 82 10,420 6,450

NHS England (in Health

Education England)1,256 53 820 402 682 3,213

NHS Trusts 55 181 1,304 236 1,920 3,696

Foundation Trusts 40 425 489 84 2,356 3,394

Other NHS - 21 3 9 117 150

Non-NHS 32 649 289 56 1,192 2,219

Total (3,429) 1,951 3,043 869 16,688 19,122

-18% 10% 16% 5% 87%

Provision for Bad Debts (including RTA Provision) (779)

Accrued Income (including Work in Progress) 8,369

Prepayments 1,578

Other Debtors 4,974

Total Trade & Other Receivables 33,263

The Trust debtors are a mixture of invoiced debtors, accrued income and prepayments as set out in the table below. The Trust has outstanding debtors of 31 days or more of £20.6m, which is an increase of

£2.9m since March. The most significant debtors greater than 90 days relate to invoices for 2016/17 over-performance with the Trust's lead CCG and outstanding balances with three foundation trusts for

provider to provider agreements and specialist drugs/services. A credit has been issued to the CCG following the outcome of the expert determination and the balance cleared in full during May.

Other debtors includes £2.3m of RTA debtors, £1.2m of Private Patients, £0.7m relates to Charity funding (of which £0.1m relates to the League of Friends and £0.6m relates to LYH) and £0.8m relating to VAT

and other debtors.

Accrued income includes £3.5m STF income for 2017/18 and 0.8m relating to STF 18/19 income, £0.8m of provider to provider income, £0.2m private patient income, work-in-progress £3.0m and £0.1m of

other income.

OverdueWithin

TermsTotal

1,951k

3,043k

869k

16,688k

Debtors

1-30 days

31-60 days

61-90 days

> 90 days

Page 89: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Capital G

Year To Date Year End Forecast

Plan Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k

Total Capital 709 283 (426) Total Capital 17,145 17,145 -

Capital

Budget Actual Variance Plan Actual Variance

Source of Funds £k £k £k Source of Funds £k £k £k

Depreciation (net of IFRIC 12) 1,219 1,219 0 Depreciation (net of IFRIC 12) 14,630 14,630 -

Loan Repayments (97) - 97 Loan Repayments (1,163) (1,163) -

Charitable Funds - - - Charitable Funds - -

Donation/Grants 78 - (78) Donation/Grants 937 937 -

NHS England (Evolve) 41 41 - NHS England (Evolve) 180 180 -

Cash Reserves/Other - Cash Reserves 2,561 2,561 -

1,241 1,260 19 17,145 17,145 -

Application of Funds Application of Funds

Other Service Developments 654 105 (549) Other Service Developments 11,885 11,885 -

Medical Equipment - - - Medical Equipment 2,514 2,514 -

Facilities & Estates - 57 57 Facilities & Estates 2,018 2,018 -

Information Technology 190 117 (73) Information Technology 4,237 4,237 -

Misc - 4 4 Misc - - -

Deferred Scheme 115 - (115) Deferred Scheme 2,086 2,086 -

Charitable Funds - - - Charitable Funds 437 437 -

Overprogramming (249) - 249 Overprogramming (6,032) (6,032) -

Total Expenditure 709 283 (426) Total Expenditure 17,145 17,145 -

Year to Date

At the end of April, capital expenditure totalled £0.28m. The largest areas of expenditure £0.04m Clinical Document Management Portal, £0.05m Canopy replacement, £0.04m Infastructure, £0.03m hot and cold water replacement, £0.03m

Licensing, £0.02m Referral Management and £0.01m West Wing Calorifier. Expenditure is £0.4m lower than plan, this is a timing issue and the total expenditure in year is forecast to be on plan.

The remainder of the project budgets have been phased according to their business case dates plus the lead times required to commence the works and then the expected duration of those works.

Full Year

Page 90: Patient First Board Report – May 2018 · 2018-07-04 · poor experience we incur adverse feedback which impacts on our Friends and Family Test scores How are we managing them? •

Finance Report M1 2018/19 Efficiency and Transformation Programme G

Workstream Plan Actual Variance Plan Forecast Variance

£k £k £k £k £k £k

FYE 17/18 470 472 2 2,692 2,692 (0)

Back Office & Corporate Support 69 79 10 1,118 1,118 0

Core 18 18 - 2,700 2,700 -

Estates & Facilities 39 38 (1) 831 831 -

Growth 146 146 - 1,746 1,746 -

Medical Workforce 18 18 - 2,350 2,350 -

Medicine 11 - (11) 930 930 (0)

Medicines Management 9 9 - 302 302 -

Nursing Workforce 26 24 (1) 725 725 0

Procurement 136 136 - 1,997 1,997 -

Surgery 13 10 (3) 1,476 1,476 -

Women and children (26) 4 30 1,102 1,102 -

Workforce - - - 160 160 -

Transformation - - - 107 107 -

Efficiency Plan Total 929 955 25 18,235 18,235 0

102.7%

Month 1 Plan vs Actual

Year-to-date savings of £0.96m have been achieved against a plan of £0.93m. This reflects the deferral of £30k of CNST related spend from M1 to M2. A delay in the agreement of the Porstmouth P2P Chemotherapy SLA has been offset by overseas

visitor income.

Year-to-Date Full Year

(100)

0

100

200

300

400

500

FYE 17/18 Back Office &Corporate Support

Core Estates & Facilities Growth Medical Workforce Medicine MedicinesManagement

Nursing Workforce Procurement Surgery Women and children Workforce Transformation

£0

00

s Plan

Actual


Recommended