Date post: | 09-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Healthcare |
Upload: | neil-muralee |
View: | 30 times |
Download: | 1 times |
BackgroundThe applicability of ultrasonography in diagnosis and monitoring of rheumatic diseases has been steadily growing but little is known about the patient´s perspective.
Objective To assess the patient’s knowledge of the use of ultrasound (US) and its clinical applicability, as well as to evaluate how much was learned after a lecture.
MethodsPatients with rheumatic diseases were invited to an educational meeting that included an ultrasound lecture. They were asked to fi ll out a questionnaire before and after the 35-minute lecture about ultrasound and its clinical uses. The questionnaire included questions about their disease and treatment, their educational background (years of study) and ten questions (Table 1) about US and its clinical uses. These ten questions had to be answered with “yes”, “no”, or “I am not sure”.
Patients’ assessment of the applicability of ultrasoundJosé Alexandre Mendonça1, Wanda Heloisa Rodrigues Ferreira2 1. Pontifi cal Catholic University of Campinas (PUCC) 2. President of Gruparj (patient education and empowerment group), Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro
ResultsA total of 70 patients answered the questionnaires and were present at the lecture. Their demographic characteristics were as follows: mean age 63 (SD12) years, disease duration mean 9.6 (40-0.8) years, the most frequent self-reported diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (57.2%), while osteoarthritis accounted for another 20%. Most patients had only eight years of study (64.3%) and a university degree was reported by 14%. The questionnaire responses of 66 patients with rheumatic diseases were analysed. There was a noticeable increase in the positive responses to questions 1, 2, 3 and 7 (Figure 1) after the lecture. Although only 26% of the patients have had an articular ultrasound, in 65% it led to a change in treatment. Positive answers to questions 4, 8, 9 and 10, which were perhaps too complex, showed a discrete increase: 6.06%, 4.55%, 9.09% and 1.52% respectively.
ConclusionAs expected, the ultrasound image method was familiar to most but not its applicability in articular diseases. After the lecture there was an increase in understanding of the positive impact of ultrasound in rheumatic diseases.
Table 1 - Questions
1. Do you know what arthritis is?
2. Do you know what an ultrasound exam is?
3. Do you believe that an ultrasound exam could help in the diagnosis of your disease?
4. Do you believe that an ultrasound exam could help in monitoring your treatment?
5. Have you ever had one of your joints examined by ultrasound?
6. Has the exam changed your treatment?
7. Do you think that an ultrasound exam would help you to better understand what is happening to your joints?
8. Do you think that an ultrasound exam would help you follow your treatment?
9. Do you believe that an ultrasound exam can detect infl ammation in your joints even when it is not clinically diagnosable by your doctor?
10. Do you think that an ultrasound exam would help you to understand your illness better?
Question 2: Do you know what an ultrasound exam is?
Question 7: Do you think an ultrasound exam would help you to better understand what is happening to your joints?
120
100
80
60
40
20
0Yes No
▀ Before▀ After
I am not sure
* p<0.001*
Question 1: Do you know what arthritis is?
120
100
80
60
40
20
0Yes No
▀ Before▀ After
I am not sure
* * p<0.001
Question 3: Do you believe that an ultrasound exam could help in the diagnosis of your disease?
120
100
80
60
40
20
0Yes No
▀ Before▀ After
I am not sure
* p<0.06
120
100
80
60
40
20
0Yes No
▀ Before▀ After
I am not sure
** p<0.001
Figure 1
*
TUI-LATAM-IV-Brazil poster-new.indd 1 30/09/2016 13:27