Date post: | 17-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ginger-powers |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Paul VanRaden
Animal Improvement Programs LaboratoryAgricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, [email protected]
2007
Improving Animals Each Generation by Selecting from
the Best Gene Sources
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (3) VanRaden 2007
Goals of Animal Breeders
Provide the world’s food needs
Adapt animals to do new, more profitable jobs
• Actual work (guide dog, draft horse)• Entertainment or companionship• Pharmaceutical production
Use modern selection tools
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (4) VanRaden 2007
Natural Selection Tools
Mother nature uses these tools:
• Starve, thirst, or freeze to death• Injury, infection, or disease• Eaten by predators• Males battle each other for mates• Harmful mutations abort or kill young
Mother nature obeys the law of the jungle
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (5) VanRaden 2007
Artificial Selection Tools
Animal breeders use these tools:
• Specialization of breeds and lines• Fence or barn or house• Import/export of genetic material• Artificial insemination, progeny test• Embryo transfer• Marker assisted selection
Animal breeders obey economic laws
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (6) VanRaden 2007
Reproductive Tools
Year Tool NameDaugh-
ters
1953 Frozen semen Frosty
1974 Embryo transfer Bova 6,241
1982 Embryo splittingDivide, Duplicate
609 479
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (7) VanRaden 2007
Potential Future Tools
X, Y sorted semen (already in use)
Embryo splitting (some use)
Adult cloning
Transgenics
Genomic selection (main focus of research)
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (8) VanRaden 2007
Family Size
Progeny test• Obtain 100 daughters of each bull• Measure important traits• Select the best bulls for further use
Descendants of 1 bull (Elevation)• 80,000 daughters • 2.3 million granddaughters• 6.5 million great-granddaughters
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (9) VanRaden 2007
History of Traits Evaluated
TraitYear
Begun TraitYear
Begun
Milk, fat 1935 Size 1983
Protein 1977 Longevity 1994
Calvingease 1978
Mastitisresistance 1994
Udder 1983 Fertility 2003
Feet/legs 1983 Stillbirth 2006
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (10) VanRaden 2007
Trait Emphasis – Dairy Selection
TraitWeight
(%) TraitWeight
(%)
Protein 23 Udder 6
Fat yield 23 Feet/legs 3
Longevity 17 Size −4
Mastitisresistance 9
Calvingease 2
Fertility 9 Stillbirth 4
100%
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (11) VanRaden 2007
Data Analysis
National genetic rankings (dairy)
• 200 million monthly records of milk yield and other traits
• 30 million × 30 million relationship matrix among cows and bulls
International genetic rankings• 27 countries on 5 continents• Combined ranking done in Sweden
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (12) VanRaden 2007
Best BullO-Bee Manfred Justice
Semen sales 198,000 units/year Semen price $40/unit Income ~$30 million to date 12,670 daughters already milking
• 10,401 in United States• 590 in France, 570 in Italy, 400 in
Denmark, 262 in the Netherlands, etc.
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (13) VanRaden 2007
Justice Daughters vs. Average Cows
TraitJustice
daughterAverage Holstein
Milk (gallons/day) 10.5 10.1
Protein (lbs/day) 2.82 2.62
Cell count (1000/ml) 231 288
Productive life (mo) 34.0 27.7
Pregnancy rate (%) 23.9 21.0
Calving difficulty (%) 3% 8%
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (14) VanRaden 2007
Computer Mating Programs
For 5 million dairy cows, mate is selected by computer programs
• Inbreeding avoided using pedigrees
• Carriers of same defect not mated
• Weak traits of cow matched to strong traits of bull
• Sires with easy birth chosen for first calf
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (15) VanRaden 2007
Milk Yield Progress
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1957 1965 1973 1981 1989 1997 2005
Birth year
Milk
(g
allo
ns
/da
y)
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (16) VanRaden 2007
Single Genes
Some breeds horned (TX longhorn)
Other breeds 100% polled (Angus)
Wild bulls/cows needed horns
Genetic dehorning is easy
Polled (no horn) gene is dominant
Other genes are more valuable
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (17) VanRaden 2007
Specialized Animals
Cattle• Dairy, not selected for meat quality• Beef, not selected for milk quality
Chickens• Layers, not selected for meat yield• Broilers, not selected for egg yield
Global use of improved varieties
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (18) VanRaden 2007
Breeding Companies
Poultry, swine• Closed, private breeding populations • Central control and vertical integration
Dairy, beef cattle• Open exchange of breeding stock• Producers choose using genetic rankings
Almost no patents or intellectual property
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (19) VanRaden 2007
Animal vs. Vegetable Food Costs$ / 50 g protein needed daily
AnimalServ-ings
Cost ($) Vegetable
Serv-ings
Cost ($)
Eggs 6 1.00 Lentils 5 .30
Milk 6 1.40 Peanut B. 7 .70
Cheese 7 1.90 Rice 17 1.00
Hot dogs 10 1.90 Bread 17 1.60
Hamburger 3 2.00 Bananas 38 2.75
Chicken 3 2.40 Soyburger 4 3.45
Steak 1 2.40 Mixed nuts 5 4.00
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (20) VanRaden 2007
Citizens Fed/AcreData from year 2000, 1 acre = .435 hectare
ContinentCitizens
(millions)Farmland
(acres)Citizens/
acre
Asia 3,634 1,150 3.2
Africa 767 435 1.8
Europe 729 666 1.1
N. America 495 593 .8
S. America 322 243 1.3
Oceania 30 127 .2
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (21) VanRaden 2007
Conclusions
People improve the genetic merit of their animals each generation
Selection tools make fast progress• Improving animal production• Improving animal health
Animal protein is very affordable
North America has few citizens
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (22) VanRaden 2007
Acknowledgments
Mel Tooker, Suzanne Hubbard, and Mark McGuire suggested several improvements
Duke Animal Law Conf. 2007 (23) VanRaden 2007
Picture Credits
Bull or cow Owner Photographer
FrostyJohn & Melford Hill
ABS Global
Bova Select Sires Jack Remsberg
Duplicate, Divide ABS Global ABS Global
Elevation Select Sires Jack Remsberg
O. Man. Justice Select Sires Frank Robinson
De-Su Oman 6121 John Erbsen
Feisty Fanny TX Longhorn As.