Presenting a live 90‐minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Payment and Performance S B d i C i P jSurety Bonds in Construction ProjectsAsserting and Defending Surety Bond Claims and Exploring a Cost Effective Alternative for Owners, Contractors and Sureties to Protect Rights or Maximize Recovery
T d ’ f l f
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2013
Today’s faculty features:
Lawrence Melton, Partner, Nexsen Pruet, Columbia, S.C.
Jonathan Burwood, Partner, Hinshaw Culbertson, Boston
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
Tips for Optimal Quality
S d Q litSound QualityIf you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted Otherwise please send us a chat or e mail when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing QualityTo maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key againpress the F11 key again.
Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps:
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your locationattendees at your location
• Click the SEND button beside the box
If you have purchased Strafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE Form).
You may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner.
If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps:
• Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-hand column on your screen hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
P f d P B dPerformance and Payment BondsAugust 15, 2013
Strafford Seminar August 15, 2013
Lawrence C. MeltonNexsen Pruet LLCNexsen Pruet, LLC
Columbia, South Carolina
Jonathan BurwoodHinshaw CulberstonHinshaw Culberston
Boston, Massachusetts
Strafford Seminar August 15, 20136
Strafford Seminar August 15, 20137
1976 J.D. Washington & Lee Law School1976 J.D. Washington & Lee Law SchoolAdmitted: Virginia, DC, South Carolina
1979 Representing Contractors on D.C. Metro System
1997 Returned to South Carolina
1998 Teaching Construction Law at University of South Carolina School of LawSouth Carolina School of Law
2001 Joined Nexsen Pruet – 7 offices in North and South Carolina; General Commercial Practice; 12 in construction practice group
2005 Published South Carolina Construction Law-2ed 20122ed. 2012.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 20138
Wants BuildingH M
Can BuildWants Money Has Money Wants Money
Owner ContractorO C
Strafford Seminar August 15, 20139
Build FirstP L
Pay FirstBuild Later Pay Later Build Later
Owner ContractorO C
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201310
Negotiated Schedule of V l AIA A201Values, e.g. AIA A201 (2007) §9.2
Applications for Applications for Payment Based on % of Completion
Architect’s Certificate of Payment
Retainage/Substantial Retainage/Substantial Completion/Punch List/Final Acceptance
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201311
Bill based on % of work in placeOwner GC
Payment based on approved % of work (self performs 0% of work)Payment based on approved % of work (self performs 0% of work)less retainage
Subs Suppliers
Subs and suppliers invoice full price. GC paid for workin place less retainage. GC never has enough to pay subs/ Survey Equipmentp g g p y /suppliers in full. GC subject to Prompt Payment Acts.
Subs may agree to retainage• Suppliers probably will not agree to retainage
Clearing & Grading Redi‐mix
Foundation Steel
Rebar Windows
Concrete Tile
Owner may agree to pay upfront: mobilization;general conditions; special equipment acquisition
• Owner will not agree to front end loading• GC Subject to False Claims Acts (31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq.)
29 States and D.C.
Framing Paint
Electrical Bricks
Mechanical Etc.
Roofing
Painting
Landscaping
Etc.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201312
Every construction contract or subcontract is an extension of credit.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201313
Subs/suppliers Risk not getting paid/not paid on timeGC Ri k f b / li fili li /GC Risk of subs/suppliers filing liens/non-
performance/failure/bankruptcyOwner Risk of GC non-performance; technical
incompetence; underbidding; dishonesty;incompetence; underbidding; dishonesty; mismanagement; liens tie up financing
Eliminate Risks Do Not buildManage the Risk Bonds and InsuranceManage the Risk Bonds and Insurance
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201314
Mechanics’ Liens: An American Solution to a Universal Problem: Laws of Maryland 1791, Chap. XLV, X : “. . . forProblem: Laws of Maryland 1791, Chap. XLV, X : . . . for all sums due and owing, on written contracts, for the building of any house in the said city . . . the undertaker . . . employed by the person for whose use the house shall be built shall have a lien on the house and the ground onbuilt, shall have a lien on the house and the ground on which the same is erected. . . and shall have the remedy as upon a mortgage . . .”
Mechanics’ Liens do not apply to Government projects absent express waiver of sovereign immunity.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201315
Being surety has ruined many men who were prosperous . . .”E l i ti 29 18 ( i 180 B C )Ecclesiasticus, 29:18 (circa 180 B.C.)
3 Parties:3 Parties:Contract for construction
Owner (bond obligee) GC (bond principal)
promise to pay GAI premiums
Surety (Bond Obligor)
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201316
INSURANCE “A t t h b d t k tINSURANCE - “A contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay a specified amount upon determinable contingencies.” S.C. Code § 38-1-20.
d d b l f k k• Funded by a pool of premium paying risk takers • Underwriting based on actuarial tables• No indemnity of insurer by insured
SURETY BOND P i h d b f hSURETY BOND - Promise to pay the debt of another
• Funded by the Bond Principal • Underwriting based on performance record of Bond Principal
d land personal assets• Principal indemnifies the Surety – General Agreement of
Indemnity (“GAI”)
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201317
PAYMENT BOND: 3 PARTY AGREEMENT Surety promises owner to pay subs/suppliers if not paid bySurety promises owner to pay subs/suppliers if not paid by GC
PERFORMANCE BOND 3 PARTY AGREEMENTPERFORMANCE BOND: 3 PARTY AGREEMENT Surety promises owner to complete project in event of GC default
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201318
STATUTORY BONDS
MILLER ACT: Act of August 24, 1935, 49 Stat. 793 (40 U.S.C. § 3131, f l 40 U S C §270 ) A li t j t $100Kformerly 40 U.S.C. §270a). Applies to projects > $100K.
LITTLE MILLER ACTS: See, Bransdorfer’s 50-State Little Miller Act Compilation (bransdorfer.net) or contact the American Subcontractor’s A i i ( ) i Al d i VAAssociation, (asa.org), in Alexandria, VA.
NOTE: Some States have more than one Little Miller Act, e.g., S. C. has three, §29-5-440 (payment bonds required on all State projects), § 11-1-120 (payment & performance bonds required on most contracts by agencies subject(payment & performance bonds required on most contracts by agencies subject to State Consolidated Procurement Code), § 29-6-210 (SC DOT Bonds).
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201319
The Miller Act Bond: FAR 53.301-25-A Standard Form 25-A, Payment Bond:
OBLIGATION:We, the Principal and Surety(ies), are firmly bound to the United States of America (hereinafterWe, the Principal and Surety(ies), are firmly bound to the United States of America (hereinafter called Government) in the above penal sum. For payment of the penal sum, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally. However, where the Sureties are corporations acting as co-sureties, we, the Sureties, bind ourselves in such sum “jointly and severally” as well as “severally” only for the purpose of allowing a joint action or actions against any or all of us. For all other purposes, each Surety binds itself, jointly and severally with the Principal for the payment of the sum shown opposite the name of the Surety. y p p y pp yIf no limit of liability is indicated, the limit of liability is the full amount of the penal sum.
CONDITIONS:The above obligation is void if the Principal promptly makes payment to all persons having a direct relationship with the Principal or a subcontractor of the Principal for furnishing labor,
t i l b th i th ti f th k id d f i th t t id tifi d bmaterial or both in the prosecution of the work provided for in the contract identified above, and any authorized modifications of the contract that subsequently are made. Notice of those modifications to the Surety(ies) are waived.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201320
§ 2. If the Contractor promptly makes payment of all sums due to Claimants, and defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the Owner from claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance o abo , ate a s o equ p e t u s ed o use t e pe o a ceof the Construction Contract, then the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond.
§ 3. If there is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the S ’ bl h O d h d h ll f hSurety’s obligation to the Owner under this Bond shall arise after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the surety of claims, demands, liens or suits against the Owner or the Owner’s property by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract andfurnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract and tendered defense of such claims, demands, liens or suits to the Contractor and the Surety.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201321
§ 3. “If there is no Owner Default [defined in § 16.4 as non-payment] under the Construction Contract . . . after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the Surety. . .”
§ 5 Notice requirements for subcontractors and remote claimants – claim must be for work done/material furnished “within ninety (90) days after having last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the Claim” – NOTE §15 “Upon request by any person or entitymaterials or equipment included in the Claim NOTE §15 Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of this Bond, the Contractor and Owner shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made.” DON’T WAIT UNTIL THE INVOICE IS OVERDUE TO REQUEST A COPY OF THE BOND!!!! Also NOTE § 16.1 - .8 – definitions of “Claim”
§ 7.1 [Surety to respond within sixty (60) days after receipt of the Claim]
§ 7.3 Bond obligee (Owner) entitled to attorneys’ fees if Surety fails to pay amounts agreed to be owed
§ 8 Surety’s obligation limited to amount of the Bond
§ 10 Surety not liable for obligations unrelated to the Construction Contract
§ 12 One year statute of limitations (not enforceable in many states, e.g. SC)
CAVEAT: PRIVATE BONDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATION AS TO NOTICE, ETC., e.g., S.C. CODE § 29-5-440.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201322
1. RTB!! Read the Bond.
2. RTS!! Read the Statute.
3. RTB2!! Read the Book. See, Kevin L. Lybeck, et al The Law of Payment Bonds (2d ed ) ABAal., The Law of Payment Bonds (2d ed.), ABA (2011). 921 Pages!!!!
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201323
A. Coverage: Miller Act
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201324
Who can make a claim on Miller Act projects?Who can make a claim on Miller Act projects?
Prime Contractor
Materialman(proper bond claimant)
Subcontractor(proper bond claimant)1st Tier(p p ) (p p )
S b i l
Sub-Subcontractor(proper bond
2 d TiMaterialman(proper bond
Subcontractor(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Materialman(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
claimant provided notice to Prime
Contractor within 90 days of last work)
2nd Tier(Remote Claimant)
(p pclaimant provided
notice to Prime Contractor within 90
days of last work)
3rd TierSub-Sub-
Subcontractor(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Materialman(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Materialman(NOT a proper
bond claimant)bond claimant)Proper Bond Claimant
Never a Proper Bond Claimant (i.e., out of luck)Strafford Seminar August 15, 2013 25
AIA A312 – 2010, § 16.2 definition of Claimant includes: “any individual or entity that has rightfully asserted a claim under an applicable mechanic’s lien or similar statute against the real property upon which the Project is located.”
B. BONDING CAPACITY (NOT EVERBODY HAS IT).C. INSOLVENCY OF THE SURETY.D. TIMELINESS OF THE SURETY’S RESPONSE.E. CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO SURETY DEFENSES:
1. OWNER DEFAULT.2. OWNER OVERPAYMENT (POTENTIAL LIABILITY FOR A/E)3. SUBROGATION: RIGHT TO ASSERT PRINCIPAL’S DEFENSES, E .G.
NON-PERFORMANCE, POOR PERFORMANCE, FAILURE TO MITIGATE DAMAGES.MITIGATE DAMAGES.
4. LACK OF NOTICEF. PENAL SUM IS LIMIT OF LIABILITY.
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201326
Strafford Seminar August 15, 2013
27
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201328
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201329
Strafford Seminar August 15, 201330
S t P f B dSurety Performance BondsJonathan Burwood
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
SURETY FUNDAMENTALS:SURETY FUNDAMENTALS:
► Surety ≠ Insurance
► Tripartite Relationship
► Surety ≠ Insurance
p p
► Indemnity Agreement
► Every Claim is Different
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 32
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
RT(F)B: “READ THE @*$%# BOND!”RT(F)B: READ THE @ $%# BOND!
► And Read the Statute
► Bonds are Contracts
► Terms of Bond Control
► Understand Rules of the Game
► Beware Conditions Precedent
► Understand Rules of the Game
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 33
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIMS: "MAGIC" WORDS?
NOTICE
TERMINATIONDEFAULT
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 34
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
DEFAULT/NOTICE:L&A Contracting Co. v. Southern Concrete Services, Inc., 17 F.3d 106 (5th Cir. 1994).
Balfour Beatty v. Colonial Ornamental Iron Works, Inc., 986 F.Supp. 82 (D.Conn. 1997).
Dragon Construction, Inc. v. Parkway Bank & Trust, 678 N.E.2d 55 (Ill.App.Ct. 1997).g , y , ( pp )
TERMINATION:Elm Haven Const. v. Neri Const., LLC, 281 F.Supp.2d 406 (D. Conn. 2003); pp ( )
Enter. Capital, Inc. v. The San-Gra Corp., 284 F.Supp.2d 166 (D. Mass. 2003).
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT:Seaboard Sur. Co. v. Greenfield, 266 F.Supp.2d 189 (D. Mass. 2003).
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 35
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
BASIC SURETY OPTIONS CHOOSE WISELYBASIC SURETY OPTIONS: CHOOSE WISELY
SURETY INVESTIGATION
DO NOTHING?!
SURETY OPTIONS
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 36
TAKEOVERTENDER
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
IMPORTANT ECONOMIC ISSUES:IMPORTANT ECONOMIC ISSUES:
► Financing The Principal► Financing The Principal
► Contract Proceeds
► Liquidated Damages
► Bond Penal Sum
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 37
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
COMMON SURETY DEFENSES:COMMON SURETY DEFENSES:
► Principal's Defensesp
► Limits of Bond Coverage
► Conditions Precedent
S it Li it ti► Suit Limitations
► Impairment of Collateral
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 38
► Impairment of Collateral
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
BEST PRACTICES: BOND CLAIMANTSBEST PRACTICES: BOND CLAIMANTS
► Read and Follow Contract, Bond and Statute
► Satisfy All Conditions Precedent
► Timely and Unequivocal Communications
► Preserve Contract Funds
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 39
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
BEST PRACTICES: SURETIESBEST PRACTICES: SURETIES
► Read Contract, Bond and Statute
► Investigate and Document
► Timely and Unequivocal Communications
► B A f P l S► Be Aware of Penal Sum
► Secure Contract Funds
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 40
Jonathan C BurwoodJonathan C. Burwood Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 28 State Street 24th Floor28 State Street, 24 FloorBoston, MA 02109617-213-7009jb d@hi h [email protected]
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 41