+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: aamir-afzal
View: 227 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 10

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    1/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 1/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark report

    BSC KHB14

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    2/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 2/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    Contents

    INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3

    TRIAL AREA ............................................................................................................................................ 4

    RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................. 5

    CALL DROP RATE: ............................................................................................................................................... 5

    CALL DROP RATE (CAUSES): ................................................................................................................................. 6

    HO PER CALL: .................................................................................................................................................... 6

    TRAFFIC: ............................................................................................................................................................ 7

    HANDOVER SUCCESS RATE: ................................................................................................................................... 7HANDOVER DISTRIBUTION: ................................................................................................................................... 8

    DRIVE TEST ANALYSIS: ......................................................................................................................................... 9

    CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................ 10

    WAY FORWARD ................................................................................................................................... 10

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    3/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 3/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    INTRODUCTION

    Parameter fine tuning of A_PBGT_HO is performed in Khobar urban area. The recommended change of the

    parametric value from 8 to 10 is implemented on trial basis on all the cells of BSC KHB14. Following is the

    benchmark report of KPIs and field measurements on the selected cluster. Due to the sites migration, the

    below mentioned benchmark is compiled on the cluster/cell zone KPIs rather than on BSC level KPIs.

    A_PBGT_HO description:

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    4/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 4/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    TRIAL AREA

    The BSC selected for the purpose of this trial is E355_KHB14. The parameter change implemented on allcells of the BSC.

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    5/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 5/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    RESULTS

    Call Drop Rate:

    Call Drop Rate shown significant improvement from 0.35% to 0.33%.

    Increase BSS drops

    causing increase in

    CDR

    Increased external

    interference

    Increased external

    interference

    Trial implementation

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    6/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 6/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    Call Drop Rate (Causes):

    5% improvement is observed in CDR Radio rate from an average value of 0.20% to 0.19%. CDR HO rate is

    also improved from 0.15% to 0.14%.

    HO per Call:

    HO per call is reduced from 2.26 to 2.03 as expected from the trial implementation which increases the

    PBGT HO window from 8 to 10.

    Trial implementation

    Trial implementation

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    7/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 7/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    Traffic:

    Traffic is in stable trend.

    Handover success rate:

    Handover success rate remains stable in the cluster.

    Trial implementation

    Trial implementation

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    8/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 8/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    Handover distribution:

    Handover distribution of Better cell HOs remains stable around 39% while Quality HOs shows 3.19%

    increase from 5.06% to 5.23% which is within acceptable limits as PGBT HO window is increased in the trial.

    Trial implementation

    Trial implementation

    Trial implementation

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    9/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 9/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    Drive test Analysis:

    DL Rxqual improvement is observed in drive test from an avg Rxqual of 1.4% to 0.9%.

    SQI improvement is also observed from an average SQI of 25.5 to 27.4.

  • 7/29/2019 PBGT HO Trial Benchmark

    10/10

    Mobily-Eastern Region-KSA 10/10A_PBGT_HO Trial Benchmark Report

    CONCLUSION

    Improvement is observed in DCR & HO per call as targeted in the trial. Tuning A_PBGT_HO value from 8 to 10 results in better PBGT handover decisions resulting in

    reduced possibility of Call drop due to HOs or radio drop after HOs. This should also result in

    improved user perception due to reduced number of unnecessary handovers.

    Improvement is also observed in drive test measurements.

    WAY FORWARD

    Generalization of the parameter can be done in the BSCs where increased HO per call contributes inhigh call drop rate.


Recommended