PC1 Edible Oil Canola

8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Canola

1/38

1

P.C.1

1. Name of the ProjectIndicate name of the project.

Enhancement of Edible Oil through Sowing

of Canola in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

2. Location Provide name of District/Province. Swabi, Mardan, Buner, Lakki

Marwat,DIKhan, Tank, Bannu, Karak and

Haripur Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Attach a map of the area, clearlyindicating the projects location.

Map of the project districts is given as:

Project District


2/38

2

3. Authorities responsible for:i. Sponsoring. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,

Agriculture Livestock & Cooperation

Department.

ii. Execution. Agriculture (Extension) Department KhyberPakhtunkhwa.

iii. Operation and Maintenance. District Directors Agriculture of the followingProject District(s) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

i. DDA Haripurii. DDA Mardaniii. DDA Buneriv. DDA Swabiv. DDA Bannuvi. DDA Karakvii. DDA Lakki Marwatviii. DDA DIKhanix. DDA Tank

iv. Concerned Federal Ministry. Not applicable.4. (a) Plan Provision.

If the project is included in themedium term/five year plan, specify

actual allocation.

The project is reflected in the ADP 2011-12

with an allocation of Rs. 9.000 million and

project cost as Rs. 20.000 million.

If not included in the current plan, whatwarrants its inclusion and how is it now

proposed to be accommodated.

Not Applicable.

If the project is proposed to be financedout of block provision, indicate:

Total Block ProvisionAmount Already

Committed.

Amount proposed for

this project.Balance available.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

(b) Provision in the current PSDP/ADP. The project is included in theADP 2011-12 at

serial No. 580-110123 with an allocation of

Rs. 9.000 million.


3/38

3

5. Project objectives. The objectives of the sector/sub sector

as indicated in the medium term/five

year plan be reproduced. Indicateobjectives of the project and develop

a linkage between the proposed

project and sectoral objectives.

The need for agricultural and rural information

and advisory services is likely to intensify in the

foreseeable future. In most of the world,agriculture faces the challenge of keeping pace

with rapidly increasing population with few

reserves of potentially cultivable land. Farmers

will have to become more efficient and

specialized.

The main goal of agriculture extension is

dissemination of better agriculture practices

through a number of effective methods which

divert the farming community from indigenous

practices to the improved/developed modern

techniques. Demonstration is the main tool tofetch the goals.

Specific objectives of the project are laying out of

canola demonstration plots in the farmers field tomotivate the community in adoption of oil seed

production reducing import bill spending on

edible oil imports.

To cut the import bill on edible oil and to

maintain equilibrium between demand & supply,

it is essential to motivate the farming community

for accommodating edible oil crops in theircropping pattern.

Specific objectives of the project are:

S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-13 Total

i. Swabi 85 85 170

ii. Mardan 85 85 170

iii. Buner 80 80 160

iv. Lakki Marwat 85 85 170

v. DIKhan 90 90 180

vi. Tank 85 90 175

vii. Bannu 90 90 180

viii. Karak 90 90 180

ix. Haripur 90 90 180

780 785 1565

1 Laying out of Canola D/Plots in:

Acres

Total :

In case of revised Projects, indicateobjectives of the project, if different from

original P.C.1.

Not applicable.


4/38

4

6. Description and justification ofproject.

Describe the project and indicateexisting facilities in the area and

justify the establishment of theProject.

Pakistan is a net importer of oil seeds and

edible oils. Domestic production of edible

oils is sufficient to meet only 25% of the totaldemand. Domestic oil seed production

includes cotton seed, sunflower seed and

rapeseed. During 2010 the harvested oil seed

production was 4.7 million metric tonnes.

The domestic production of edible oils is

critically insufficient to meet the demand of

growing population. The deficiency of 75%

in the demand of edible oil is met out from

import which increases our import bill by

billions of dollars. There is an intensive need

to increase domestic product of edible oil sothe import bill may be cut to short.

To get the rid of this problem, department

envisaged to promote canola crop cultivation

in the province.

Major oilseed crops are classified into two

groups namely traditional and no traditional.

Cotton, rapeseed/mustard, groundnut and

sesame include in traditional oil seeds while

sunflower and canola are included in non-

traditional oilseeds. Rapeseed/mustard,

sunflower and canola are important oilseed

crops after cottonseed, which contribute

approximately 7%, 32% and 10% in the total

domestic edible oil production, respectively.

Existing Facilities

Technical staff is available at each District

with mobility to access the target group of the

project.

Provide technical parameters i.e. inputand output of the project in quantitative

terms. Also discuss the technology

aspects of the project.

With the help of this project an area of about

1565 Acres will be brought under canola crop.The demonstration plots would be laid out in the

farmers field. The project will provide the

beneficiary with a pale of seed, chemical fertilizerand pesticides for the control of insect, pest and

diseases.

From this area farmers will fetch 890.56 metric

ton of canola produce (445.28 tonnes/annum).


5/38

5

Per Acre Input Requirements and their Cost.

Unit Cost Amount Unit Cost Amount

Seed Kgs 2 Rs. 160 Rs. 320.00 Rs. 184.00 Rs. 368.00

DAP bag 1.5 Rs. 4,000 Rs. 6,000.00 Rs. 4,600.00 Rs. 6,900.00

Urea bag 2 Rs. 1,500 Rs. 3,000.00 Rs. 1,725.00 Rs. 3,450.00

Spray Nos. 2 Rs. 600 Rs. 1,200.00 Rs. 690.00 Rs. 1,380.00

Toal : Rs. 10,520.00 Rs. 12,098.00

1st Year 2nd Year (15% increase over

1st year cost)

QtyUnitItem

Seed Requirements

Area in

Acr.

Seed

Rate/Acr

(in Kgs)

Required Qty

of Seed (in

Kgs.)

Area in

Acr.

Seed

Rate/Acr

(in Kgs)

Required

Qty of Seed

(in Kgs.)

1 Swabi 85 170 85 85 255

2 Mardan 85 170 85 85 255

3 Buner 80 160 80 80 240

4 Lakki Marwat 85 170 85 85 255

5 DIKhan 90 180 90 90 270

6 Tank 85 170 90 90 2607 Bannu 90 180 90 90 270

8 Karak 90 180 90 90 270

9 Haripur 90 180 90 90 270

Total : 780 1560 785 785 2345

2012-13

2 2

District Seed Requirements/Input (in Kgs)S.No.

2011-12 Total

Required

Qty. in

Kgs.

Fertilizer Requirements

DAP Urea DAP Urea DAP Urea Total

1 Swabi 127.5 170.0 127.5 170.0 255.0 340.0 595.0

2 Mardan 127.5 170.0 127.5 170.0 255.0 340.0 595.0

3 Buner 120.0 160.0 120.0 160.0 240.0 320.0 560.04 Lakki Marwat 127.5 170.0 127.5 170.0 255.0 340.0 595.0

5 DIKhan 135.0 180.0 135.0 180.0 270.0 360.0 630.0

6 Tank 127.5 170.0 135.0 180.0 262.5 350.0 612.5

7 Bannu 135.0 180.0 135.0 180.0 270.0 360.0 630.0

8 Karak 135.0 180.0 135.0 180.0 270.0 360.0 630.0

9 Haripur 135.0 180.0 135.0 180.0 270.0 360.0 630.0

Total : 1,170.0 1,560.0 1,177.5 1,570.0 2,347.5 3,130.0 5,477.5

S.No. District Fertilizer Requirements (in bags)

2011-12 2012-13 Total


6/38

6

Output of the Project:

The project will fetch increased oil seed crops production from the demonstration plots

to be laid out in the farmers fields. The quantitative output of the project in term of

produce is estimated as:

2011-12 2012-13 Total

Swabi 43.01 43.01 86.02

Mardan 43.01 43.01 86.02

Buner 40.48 40.48 80.96

Lakki Marwat 43.01 43.01 86.02

DIKhan 45.54 45.54 91.08

Tank 43.01 45.54 88.55

Bannu 45.54 45.54 91.08

Karak 45.54 45.54 91.08

Haripur 45.54 45.54 91.08

Total : 394.68 397.21 791.89

District Expected Produce (@ 506 kgs/acre.) in M.Tonnes

2011-12 2012-13 Total

Swabi 6881.60 6881.60 13763.20

Mardan 6881.60 6881.60 13763.20

Buner 6476.80 6476.80 12953.60

Lakki Marwat 6881.60 6881.60 13763.20

DIKhan 7286.40 7286.40 14572.80

Tank 6881.60 7286.40 14168.00

Bannu 7286.40 7286.40 14572.80

Karak 7286.40 7286.40 14572.80

Haripur 7286.40 7286.40 14572.80

Total : 63148.80 63553.60 126702.40

District Oil extraction from 40% of the product (in litters)

From the above quoted produce canola oil would be extracted at a ratio of 40% of the produce

so the farming community will fetch 63351.20 litters canola oil per annum which would fetch

an income of Rs. 9.502 million per annum at an average. Besides that canola cakes to be

obtained would also be used as by product to the domestic animals as fattening factor which

resultantly increase meat/beef ratio by 10~15% .

Provide details of civil works,equipment, machinery and other

physical facilities required for the

project.

Physical facilities to be required for the

project have already been mentioned above.

The seed, fertilizers and pesticides would be

procured for further distribution amongst the

beneficiaries. The beneficiaries are required

to provide the project with usage of

agriculture implements required for sowing

and harvesting of the crop; implements to be

used for plant protection measures.


7/38

7

The plots would be allotted under a

mechanism to be devised in convenience of

the farming community and service providers.

For the purpose, beneficiary will have to

provide with an under taking (specimen at the

end of the paper), that he will abide by theadvices / guidelines extended by the

agriculture department / experts from time to

time. He will have to utilize the quantity of

the produce proposed / recommended by

agriculture department by him while rest of

the produce (if any) will be disposed off

through sale to government agencies or

agriculture development fund (what the case

may be).

Indicate governance issues of the sectorrelevant to the project and strategy to

resolve them.

The farming community / beneficiaries

should have to be bound for disposal of the

produce as per instructions of the

agriculture department (extension wing).

The farmer at itself doesnt act accordingly

the instructions and feel himself at liberty to

handle the produce at his will. The fruit of

the project, in this way does not appear to

be projected before the rest of the

community. So to solve the problem, it is

proposed that before allotment of a plot, the

beneficiary would have to provide thedepartment with an undertaking that he will

abide by the guidelines issued by the

department from time to time and would be

bound to dispose his produce off under the

instruction of the department.

Agriculture Production:

For fisheries projects: Give area forfishing and the legal rights to that area;

the availability of trawlers; amountand type of fish likely to be available.

Not applicable.

For Forestry projects: Indicate natureand state of existing forests their

growth rate and any problems

connected therewith. Give details of

species; rotation and anticipated

rotation and volume yield. Indicate

availability of complementary

services, e.g. access roads, saw millsetc.

Not applicable.


8/38

8

For Agriculture Production Projects:Give present and future crop yield,

cropping intensity; land use pattern

technological intervention and the

basis for calculation of the futureoutput.

According to Economic Survey of Pakistan

2010-11, during 2009-10 canola crop was

grown over an area of about 233000 acres

with production of 131000 tonnes seed.

Present situation is not encouraging one.The manifesto of project is to enhance

edible oil area and production. With the

help of this project 1565 acre area will be

brought under canola cultivation which

would fetch 791.89 tonnes of its produce. If

10% of the produce is utilized as canola

seed for further cultivation, it will bring

39550 acres more area under canola.

For all agriculture production sectorprojects, provide

(i) Transport, equipment and fieldmachinery available with the

department.

Road worthy vehicle are available with the

District Officers of Agriculture in the project

District. Besides that Agriculture Officers and

Field Assistant have motorbikes for visit and

supervision of the project activities.

(ii) Effect on farm income andbasis for pricing of outputs.

From the produce canola oil would be

extracted at a ratio of 40% of the produce so

the farming community of Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa will fetch 63351 litters

canola oil per annum which would fetch an

income of Rs. 9.502 million per annum at

an average. Besides that canola cakes to be

obtained would also be used as by product

to the domestic animals as fattening factor

which resultantly increase meat/beef ratio

by 10~15%.

(iii) Farm gate and internationalprices.

The project will bring an area of about 1565

Acres under canola crop. The expectedyield per acre is estimated as 791.89 tonnes

during 2 years i.e. project period. If it is

sold @ Rs. 160/- p.killogram or Rs. 0.160

million per tones the farmer will fetch Rs.

126.70 million of Rupees from its produce.


9/38

9

Agriculture Extension;

Provide history of extension work inand around project area an justify the

extension work.

Agriculture Extension system is an out of

school education system. It has its mandate

viz improving living standard of farming

community through increase in farm incomeby perceiving potential output with an

acceptable quality on sustainable basis.

Agriculture Extension department have

following functions to attend.

1. Dissemination of recommendedagricultural practices.

2. Educate/Train farmers in improvedagricultural production technology.

3. Production and distribution ofquality seed and fruit plants.

4. Advisory services in insect/pestmanagement & horticultural

activities.

5. Organize farmers for collectivesolution of agricultural problems.

6. Quality control and regulatorymeasures of Agricultural inputs.

7. Establish & Develop MarketInformation System (MIS) &

Establishment of Regulated Markets

in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

8. Execution of various cropsIntroduction & Promotion

Programme.

For adoption of modern agriculture

techniques farming community should have

motivated to shift from indigenous methods

to modern track. For the purpose meetings

with the community are arranged, lecturesare delivered but the most effective tool is

laying out of demonstration plots, holding

of field days, arranging workshops and

seminars, exposure visits, experience

sharing workshops etc.

In the history of agriculture extension, there

is a long queue of progress. The efforts

made by Agriculture Extension Work Force

lead the nation towards prosperity and self

sufficiency in food grains despite the globalchallenges of food insecurity.


10/38

10

Provide transport, equipment and fieldmachinery etc available with the

department.

The Department has had provided its

Agriculture Officers/Field Assistants with

motorbikes on ownership. The cost of these

bikes are recovered in easy installments

without any extra charges. So projectsprovide them with POL / maintenance of

their vehicle and they use this transport for

official touring, field visits, execution and

operational activities of the development

projects.

As far as matter of equipments is

concerned, most of the Model Farm

Services Centers have agriculture

equipments to provide it to its registered

members as well as un registered farmingcommunity of that respective district. These

farm equipments are provided on nominal

rental. The cost charged is used for

maintenance of those equipments.

Anyhow, arrangements of equipments and

farm machinery is sole responsibility of the

beneficiary either he own or get on rental.

Industry, Commerce and Minerals:

Provide installed capacity, proposedexpansion and available technologies,

the selected technology and reason for

its selection.

Not Applicable.

Whether the output is meant for:(i) Import substitution. Not applicable.(ii)

Meeting domestic demand or Not applicable

(iii) Export oriented. Not applicable. In case of export, give likely markets

and their size, competitive prices and

cost of production to justify the project.

Not applicable.

Provide all information under with andwithout project conditions in case of

BMR and expansion projects.

Not applicable.


11/38

11

7. Capital Cost Estimates. Indicate date of estimation of project

cost estimate.

August, 2011.

Basis of determining the capital cost beprovided. It includes market survey,

schedule rates, estimation on the basis

of previous work done etc.

Market prevailing rates.

Provide year-wise estimation ofphysical activities:

Year wise / component wise physical activities

S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-13 Total

i. Swabi 85 85 170

ii. Mardan 85 85 170

iii. Buner 80 80 160

iv. Lakki Marwat 85 85 170

v. DIKhan 90 90 180

vi. Tank 85 90 175

vii. Bannu 90 90 180

viii. Karak 90 90 180

ix. Haripur 90 90 180780 785 1565

1 Laying out of Canola D/Plots in:

Acres

Total :

Phasing of capital cost be worked out on the basis of each item of work as statedabove and provide as per following:

Code Classification 2011-12 2012-13 Total

A03805 Travelling Allowance 0.300 0.740 1.040

A03827 POL Charges 0.494 0.798 1.292

A09370 Inputs for Dem Plots

Cost of Seed 0.250 0.289 0.538

Cost of Fertilizers

i. DAP 4.680 5.382 10.062

ii. Urea 2.340 2.708 5.048

Cost of Spray 0.936 1.083 2.019

G.Total of the Scheme= 9.000 11.000 20.000


12/38

12

In case of revised projects,provide:

Project is new one.

Project approved history alongwith PSDP allocations, releases

and expenditure.

Not applicable.

Item-wise, year-wise actualexpenditure and Physical

Progress.

Not applicable.

Justification for revision of PC-1and variation in scope of project

if applicable.

Not applicable.

Item-wise comparison of revisedcost with the approved cost and

give reason for variation.

Not applicable.

Exchange rate used to work outFEC in the original and revised

P.C.1s.

Not applicable

8. Annual Operational Cost. Item-wise annual operating cost

based on proposed capacity

utilization for 5 years.

A. Five years summary of the Operational CostCode Classification 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Total

A03805 Travelling Allowance 0.851 0.979 1.125 1.294 1.488 5.738

A03827 POL Charges 0.918 1.055 1.214 1.396 1.605 6.187

Inputs for Dem Plots

Cost of Seed 0.332 0.382 0.439 0.505 0.581 2.240

Cost of Fertilizersi. DAP 6.189 7.118 8.185 9.413 10.825 41.731

ii. Urea 3.114 3.582 4.119 4.737 5.447 20.999

Cost of Spray 1.246 1.433 1.648 1.895 2.179 8.400

G.Total of the Scheme= 12.650 14.548 16.730 19.240 22.126 85.294

A09370


13/38

13

B. Component Wise Cost.i. Seed Cost:

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 31,280 35,972 41,368 47,573 54,709 67,252

2 Mardan 31,280 35,972 41,368 47,573 54,709 67,252

3 Buner 29,440 33,856 38,934 44,775 51,491 63,296

4 Lakki Marwat 31,280 35,972 41,368 47,573 54,709 67,252

5 DIKhan 33,120 38,088 43,801 50,371 57,927 71,208

6 Tank 31,280 35,972 41,368 47,573 54,709 67,252

7 Bannu 33,120 38,088 43,801 50,371 57,927 71,208

8 Karak 33,120 38,088 43,801 50,371 57,927 71,208

9 Haripur 33,120 38,088 43,801 50,371 57,927 71,208

Total Input Cost: 287,040 330,096 379,610 436,552 502,035 617,136

S.No. District Seed Cost Total Seed

ii. Fertilizer Costa. DAP Cost

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 586,500 674,475.00 775,646.25 891,993.19 1,025,792.17 1,260,975

2 Mardan 586,500 674,475.00 775,646.25 891,993.19 1,025,792.17 1,260,975

3 Buner 552,000 634,800.00 730,020.00 839,523.00 965,451.45 1,186,800

4 Lakki Marwat 586,500 674,475.00 775,646.25 891,993.19 1,025,792.17 1,260,975

5 DIKhan 621,000 714,150.00 821,272.50 944,463.38 1,086,132.88 1,335,150

6 Tank 586,500 674,475.00 775,646.25 891,993.19 1,025,792.17 1,260,9757 Bannu 621,000 714,150.00 821,272.50 944,463.38 1,086,132.88 1,335,150

8 Karak 621,000 714,150.00 821,272.50 944,463.38 1,086,132.88 1,335,150

9 Haripur 621,000 714,150.00 821,272.50 944,463.38 1,086,132.88 1,335,150

Total Input Cost: 5,382,000 6,189,300 7,117,695 8,185,349 9,413,152 11,571,300

S.No. District D.A.P. Cost Total DAP Cost

b. Urea Cost

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 293,250 337,237.50 387,823.13 445,996.59 512,896.08 630,488

2 Mardan 293,250 337,237.50 387,823.13 445,996.59 512,896.08 630,488

3 Buner 276,000 317,400.00 365,010.00 419,761.50 482,725.73 593,400

4 Lakki Marwat 293,250 337,237.50 387,823.13 445,996.59 512,896.08 630,4885 DIKhan 310,500 357,075.00 410,636.25 472,231.69 543,066.44 667,575

6 Tank 293,250 337,237.50 387,823.13 445,996.59 512,896.08 630,488

7 Bannu 310,500 357,075.00 410,636.25 472,231.69 543,066.44 667,575

8 Karak 310,500 357,075.00 410,636.25 472,231.69 543,066.44 667,575

9 Haripur 310,500 357,075.00 410,636.25 472,231.69 543,066.44 667,575

Total Input Cost: 2,691,000 3,094,650 3,558,848 4,092,675 4,706,576 5,785,650

S.No. District Urea Cost Total Urea Cost


14/38

14

iii. Cost of Pesticides/Insecticides etc.

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 117,300 134,895.00 155,129.25 178,398.64 205,158.43 252,195

2 Mardan 117,300 134,895.00 155,129.25 178,398.64 205,158.43 252,195

3 Buner 110,400 126,960.00 146,004.00 167,904.60 193,090.29 237,360

4 Lakki Marwat 117,300 134,895.00 155,129.25 178,398.64 205,158.43 252,195

5 DIKhan 124,200 142,830.00 164,254.50 188,892.68 217,226.58 267,030

6 Tank 117,300 134,895.00 155,129.25 178,398.64 205,158.43 252,195

7 Bannu 124,200 142,830.00 164,254.50 188,892.68 217,226.58 267,030

8 Karak 124,200 142,830.00 164,254.50 188,892.68 217,226.58 267,030

9 Haripur 124,200 142,830.00 164,254.50 188,892.68 217,226.58 267,030

Total Input Cost: 1,076,400 1,237,860 1,423,539 1,637,070 1,882,630 2,314,260

S.No. District Spray Cost Total Spray

Cost

C. Total Input Cost

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 1.028 1.183 1.360 1.564 1.799 2.211

2 Mardan 1.028 1.183 1.360 1.564 1.799 2.211

3 Buner 0.968 1.113 1.280 1.472 1.693 2.081

4 Lakki Marwat 1.028 1.183 1.360 1.564 1.799 2.211

5 DIKhan 1.089 1.252 1.440 1.656 1.904 2.341

6 Tank 1.028 1.183 1.360 1.564 1.799 2.211

7 Bannu 1.089 1.252 1.440 1.656 1.904 2.341

8 Karak 1.089 1.252 1.440 1.656 1.904 2.341

9 Haripur 1.089 1.252 1.440 1.656 1.904 2.341

Total Input Cost: 9.436 10.852 12.480 14.352 16.504 20.288

S.No. District Total Inputs Cost Total Inputs

Cost

9. Demand and supply analysis (forIndustrial and Agricultural

Production Projects).

Description of product /services.

The farming community i.e. target group of the

project will be provided with inputs like seed,

fertilizers and pesticides for laying out of

demonstration plots in to their fields. They should

abide by the instructions /directives

communicated to them by the Agriculture Field

Staff from time to time. The Agriculture staff

namely District Director Agriculture of theconcerned district will visit the field/plot from

time to time. The plots would be laid out under

the instructions and direct supervision of

concerned Agriculture Officer who would be

assisted by his Agriculture Inspector and Field

Assistant. The Agriculture Inspector or Field

Assistant of concerned circle would frequently

pay visit to the demonstration plot and would be

intact with farmers from sowing to harvest.


15/38

15

Demand/Supply along withunit price for the last five

years.

Pakistans vegetable oil imports are forecast at arecord 2.16 million metric tons (MMT) in Marketing

Year (MY) 2011/12, five percent higher than theestimated 2.05 MMT imported in the 2010/11.

Nearly 75 percent of Pakistans domestic

consumption of vegetable oil is met through imports,

81 percent of which is comprised of palm oil. MY2011/12 imports of soybean meal are projected at a

record 400,000 tons, largely sourced from India.Production of oilseeds in 2011/12 is forecast at a

record 5.8 MMT, up 24 percent from the estimated

4.7 MMT harvested in 2010/11. Pakistans

sunflower area in MY 2010/11 increased by over 65

percent over the previous year and production is

estimated at 660,000 tons. Imports of oilseeds are

forecast at a record 1.3 MMT (92 percent rape seed

and 8 percent sunflower seed).

As far as requirements of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are

concerned, presently the population of the province

is estimated as 25697000 during 2011 (Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa Development Statistics 2010); per

capita consumption of edible oil is 28 Kg/Lit per

one/annum; thus total requirements of edible oilscomes to 719516 metric tons. Per Liter Unit

price/consumer price is Rs. 190.00 at present.

In 2008 per unit cost was Rs. 136/Lit.

Production, Supply and Demand Data Statistics:TotalOilseed

2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012Pakistan

MarketYearBegin:Oct MarketYearBegin:Oct MarketYearBegin:Oct

2009 2010 2011

USDAOfficial NewPost USDAOfficial NewPost USDAOfficial NewPost

AreaPlanted

AreaHarvested 3,722 3,432 3,622 3,332 0 4,092

BeginningStocks 67 28 285 40 0 30

Production 5,097 5,097 4,789 4,682 0 5,792

MYImports 1,078 1,005 910 1,180 0 1,300

MYImp.fromU.S. 2 0 2 0 0 0

MYImp.fromEU 18 0 15 0 0 0

TotalSupply 6,242 5,822 6,012 5,902 0 7,122

MYExports 0 0 0 0 0 0

MYExp.toEU 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crush 5,227 5,070 5,230 5,120 0 6,130FoodUseDom.Cons. 0 2 0 2 0 2

FeedWasteDom.Cons. 730 710 628 750 0 940

TotalDom.Cons. 5,957 5,782 5,858 5,872 0 7,072

EndingStocks 285 40 154 30 0 50

TotalDistribution 6,242 5,822 6,012 5,902 0 7,122

CYImports 980 0 810 0 0 00

CYImp.fromU.S. 2 0 2 0 0 0

CYExports 0 0 0 0 0 0

CYExp.toU.S. 0 2 0 0 0 0

TS=TD 0 0 0 0 0 0

Source: Pakistan Oil Seeds and Products 2011.


16/38

16

Imports/Exports for the last fiveyears along with unit price (if

applicable).

Pakistan is among one of the worlds largest

importers of vegetable oil. In Market Year

2011/12, palm oil imports are forecast at a

record 2.1 MMT, up 5 percent from last

years estimate of 2.0 MMT. Refined palm

oil accounts for about 81 percent ofPakistans total edible oil imports. The

United States exports only limited quantities

of soybean oil to Pakistan in the form of

food aid.

Project demand/supply for 10 years.

Settled FATA Toal

1998 17736 3176 20912 585545

2008 23640 4400 28040 785123

2009 24307 4494 28801 806439

2010 24993 4591 29584 828344

2011 25679 4689 30368 850307

2012 26384 4790 31173 872856

2013 27108 4892 32000 896007

2014 27852 4997 32849 919776

2015 28617 5104 33721 9441802016 29402 5214 34616 969235

2017 30209 5325 35534 994960

2018 31038 5439 36478 1021373

2019 31890 5556 37446 1048491

2020 32765 5675 38440 1076333

2021 33665 5797 39461 1104920

YearPopulation '000" Per Capita Consumption

of edible oil (in kgs)Requirements(in M.Tonnes)

28

As already mentioned the local produce (on country

level) fulfils only 25% of the total requirements,

while rest is recouped through import of edible oils.The project is aimed at to motivate the farming

community to adopt the crop and include it in their

cropping pattern. It would help to bring a gradual

increase in the area under crop by 5~10% per

annum.


17/38

17

Proposed year-wise production and unit price of the product.From the project following production is estimated to be

derived to the farmers through laying out of demonstration

plots in their field.

2011-12 2012-13 Total

Swabi 43.01 43.01 86.02

Mardan 43.01 43.01 86.02

Buner 40.48 40.48 80.96

Lakki Marwat 43.01 43.01 86.02

DIKhan 45.54 45.54 91.08

Tank 43.01 45.54 88.55

Bannu 45.54 45.54 91.08Karak 45.54 45.54 91.08

Haripur 45.54 45.54 91.08

Total : 394.68 397.21 791.89

District Expected Produce (@ 506 kgs/acres.) in M.Tonnes

Existing and proposed arrangements for marketing.The produce of these demonstration plots to be laid out in

the farmers field will be disposed off in consultation with

Department of Agriculture Extension. The Extension staff

will help the farmer in marketing of the produce.

10.Financial PlanSource of Financing: Provincial ADP 2011-12.

(a)Equity: Sponsors own resources -- Federal government Provincial government DFIs/banks General Public Foreign Equity (indicate

partner Agency.

NGOs/Beneficiaries Others

--

Rs.20.000 Million (ADP 2011-12)--

--

--

--

--

--

--


18/38

18

(b)DebtIndicate the local & foreign debt,

interest rate, and grace period and

repayment period for each loan

separately. The loan repayment

schedule be also annexed.

Not applicable.

(c)Grants along with source. Provincial ADP(d)Weighted cost of capital --

11.Benefits of the project and analysis.Financial:

Income to the project along with

assumptions:

(In Million Rs)

1st year 2nd year Total

Swabi 6.882 7.914 14.795

Mardan 6.882 7.914 14.795Buner 6.477 7.448 13.925

Lakki Marwat 6.882 7.914 14.795

DIKhan 7.286 8.379 15.666

Tank 6.882 8.379 15.261

Bannu 7.286 8.379 15.666

Karak 7.286 8.379 15.666

Haripur 7.286 8.379 15.666

Total : 63.149 73.087 136.235

District Expected Income from the Produce (@ Rs. 160000/- p.tonne)

(15% increase over the last year)

Economic:

Benefit to the economy along with

assumption.

Through the help of this project socio economic condition of hard living

farming community will be changed. With better yield from improved canola

crop, he will fetch better income with lesser investment. From the above

mentioned targeted area, the farmer will fetch 791.89 tons canola. If 40% of

this produce is used for further plantation i.e. 316.75 metric tonnes, it will

cover 158375 acres under the crop and with 10% annual increase in area it

would touch 174212 acres. Following table is an assumption of the area to bebrought from40% of the above produce.


19/38

19

1st year 2nd year Total

Swabi 8602 8602 17204

Mardan 8602 8602 17204Buner 8096 8096 16192

Lakki Marwat 8602 8602 17204

DIKhan 9108 9108 18216

Tank 8602 9108 17710

Bannu 9108 9108 18216

Karak 9108 9108 18216

Haripur 9108 9108 18216

Total = 78936 79442 158378

District Area to be brought from the 40% of the Expected

Produce (in acres)

Social:Benefits with indicators: Through better income farming community

will have a pleasant social change as in

enhanced purchasing power, stepping

forward to prosperity the socio economic

level would be enhanced.

Result Based Monitoring (RBM)

Indicators:

Indicate Result Based Monitoring(RBM) framework indicators inquantifiable terms in the

following table.

Baseline Indicator Targets after

Completion of Project

Layingout of Oilseed plots Production in

M.Tonnes

The target/

achievement during

the 1st year of the

project is Base line

(in Acres)

Area to be brought

from the 40% of the

Expected Produce (in

Acres)

The produce from the

area to be brought

from 40% of the

expected produce (in

matric tonnes) @ 506

Kgs/acre

1 Swabi =170 Acres 8705 85 8602 4353

2 Mardan= 170 Acres 8705 85 8602 4353

3 Buner= 160 Acres 8193 80 8096 4097

4 Lakki Marwat =170 Acres 8705 85 8602 4353

5 DIKhan =180 Acres 9217 90 9108 4609

6 Tank= 175 Acres 8961 85 9108 4609

7 Bannu= 180 Acres 9217 90 9108 4609

8 Karak = 180 Acres 9217 90 9108 4609

9 Haripur = 180 Acres 9217 90 9108 4609

Total : 1565 Acres Or 633.34 ha. 80139 780 79442 40198

S.No Input Output Outcome Targeted Impact


20/38

Page 20 of 38

SWOT Analysis and Implicative Strategies

StrengthsDiverse agro-ecological situations

The diverse agro-ecological situations prevalent in the nine project districts favourscultivation canola oilseed crops. Oilseeds are being cultivated in all the agro-ecoregions of the

province. Sub-humid and arid ecosystems also contribute substantial area and production of

oilseeds.

Strong research for development of oilseed technology exist as work of the Oil Seed Development

Board in a number of oil seed crops leads to development of the sector.

Strong frontline extension network for oilseed technology dissemination

The extension network for transfer of oilseed technologies that are developed by oilseeds

development board and Agriculture Research Systems would be disseminated through ExtensionWorkers.

Technology Mission on Oilseeds and impact

Public /Private sector can play a predominant role in increasing the production of oilseeds.

The project impact/results would catch the eye of the private sector for investment.

Continuity of the work of Oil Seed Development Board in Oil Seed Promotion in the Province.

Impact of first line transfer of technology

Production and distribution of quality oilseeds

Seed is a critical and basic input for attaining sustained growth in oilseed production.

Distribution of assured quality seed is necessary for attaining higher yields. Project will also

provide technical assistance for establishment and maintenance of seed banks private level. The

Department of Agriculture Extension Khyber Pakhtunkhwa will be involved in production and

distribution of assured quality seeds for the benefit of oilseed growers.

Human resource development: Through laying out of demonstration plots and technical training /

guidelines to be extended by the Extension Staff will help in human resource development.

Initiatives from oil industry.

Result assumed from the project activities will also get attention of the Oil Industry and hoped

that initiatives would be taken by the oil industry for further extension of the scope of oil seed

production in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.


21/38

21

Weaknesses

Production situation

The country produce of oil seed only have a place of 25% of the total requirements.

The development process is a long and lethargic. Limited resources do not allowinvesting billion of rupees on development for getting higher production with

increased area under the crop.

System constraints in public sector transfer of oilseed technology

Though, the larger portion of transfer of technology responsibility lies with the public

sector, there are many lacunae that hamper the transfer of technology efforts by this sector:

1. Multiplicities of technology transfer by each line department and there is littlecoordination across different departments involved.

2. Narrow focus of the agricultural extension system i.e. limited activities have beenundertaken to develop and transfer sustainable technologies to the farmers.

3. Lack of an effective feedback system lead to the extension system that did not focus on thefelt needs of the farmers. Individual farmers or farmers forum did not have effective

linkage with the research and extension system.

4. Little attention was given by the government in developing a cadre of well-qualifiedsubject matter specialists (SMS) with both technical competence and professional skills to

disseminate the improved oilseed technologies to the field level staff as well as the oilseed

growers.

5. The poor research-extension linkage and lack of integration across crop limit technologytransfer from incorporating high value commodities and diversification of the livelihood

activities of the farm into farming systems.

6. Most of the technical staff within the line departments lack the capacity to effectivelycommunicate with both research system and the stakeholder groups. The flow of

information from research to extension tends to be top-down rather interactive. There is

little use of up-to-date communication technologies viz, mass media, print media and

electronic communication between research-extension-stakeholder systems.

Processing situation

Pakistani processing industry suffers from several maladies like outdated technology,lower rates of utilization of installed capacity, low oil recoveries and high unit costs.

Reservation of oilseeds output for small scale processing is depriving the farmers and

consumers of the benefits of lower costs of modern processing technology, while putting up

the costs for consumers. The cost of vegetable oil processing in the country is very high as

compared to the countries like China and USA mainly due to smaller capacities, low

technical efficiency and low capacity utilization. Additional inefficiency arises from non-

integration of solvent extraction units with expeller units; As a result, significant amounts of

expeller cake are not solvent extracted resulting in considerable losses of oil and meal

products.


22/38

22

Opportunities


Biotechnology offers an impressive option to supplement the ongoing efforts on

developing genetically enhanced germplasm of oilseeds for achieving sustainable foodproduction.


There are uncommon opportunities to add value to different oilseeds and oils, which

must be fully exploited, which will eventually enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of

these crops.

ThreatsProduction situation

One factor that has contributed to insufficient domestic supply of oilseeds is the

province development strategy that has often favoured production of crops that compete with

oilseeds for area. The community is attracted to grow other cash crops like sugarcane, wheat etc

and the oil seed crops get little attention of the grower.


The technical inefficiencies in oilseed production, leads to threatening processing

situation. Under utilization of resources reflects a poor-resource base of the farmers and have

implications for optimum utilization of inputs and production of outputs, both onfarm and in

processing unit to reduce allocative and scale inefficiencies. Lack of assured market for oilseeds

and timely and assured supply of quality seeds and raw material for processing have been found

as important factors contributing to the poor performance of the oilseed industry. The standards

set by the oil import countries after liberalization were very high, at times giving impression that

they were used as trade barriers. But all said and done, exporting countries especially the

developing and under developed countries were caught in the web of stringent quality parameters.

Edible oil demand is higher than the supply which created adverse economical situation.


23/38

23

Implicative strategies


The public sector has to strengthen its network for developing improved varieties/

hybrids of oilseeds and must encourage the private sector for production of hybrids and

dissemination of technologies.

Diversification in existing cropping systems such as rice-rice, rice-wheat and

sugarcane in favour of oilseeds is the current need of the country. Providing a policy back up to

support diversification in favour of oilseeds through effective input and price support system is

very important to increase area under oilseeds.

Generation of success stories by working for a minimum of 3 years with the same set of

farmers, instead of working with different groups every year. This will help in concluding

situation and farming system-specific results in a given agro-ecological situation.

Identification and analysis of success stories created by other sources of innovation. Exposure visit to the successful farms created by the other sources to study the similarities

and the differences.

Exposure visit for the interested oilseed growers to the success story sources. Replication of success stories by utilizing the successful farmers as the trainers or resource

persons and the successful farms as the classrooms.

Use of revolving fund for promoting the self-help groups in disseminating improvedtechnological packages instead of distributing subsidies. The community may be

motivated and trained in oilseed-based farming systems and other related enterprises rather

than merely technological packages.

Use of mass media viz, video programmes, print media, radio or television forpopularizing the success stories, instead of utilizing the media for popularizing thetechnological packages.

Reorienting the extension/ transfer of technology system as a system that provides market-producer linkage instead of using it as an agency for distributing input subsidy. It needs a

major shift in the outlook of the extension officials of the development departments

through constant and intensive human resource development planning and

implementation.

To strengthen oil seed marketing system following recommendation may be approved:

Better enforcement of regulated markets Strengthening the appropriate market institutions Promotion of market integration Price incentives for edible oil shortage Better management of edible oil price fluctuation risk during storage Improving quality of information and efficiency of its dissemination Rewarding better quality produce Strengthening regulations regarding quality Enhancing earning from oilcakes and oil meals


24/38


25/38

25

Environmental:Environmental impact assessment

negative/positive.

The greenery has positive environmental

impact and its absorption power of

poisonous matters brings pleasant

environmental change. The flower attracts

honey bee and they use its nectar for honey

preparation in their hives.

Financial/Economic Analysis(with

assumptions)

Financial analysis

Quantifiable output of the project. As already mentioned above the quantifiableoutput in terms of income to be derived to the

beneficiaries will be 132.61 million during the

project life.

Profit and loss account and cashflow statement

The project is developing one and not on thebasis of profit or loss as is presumed in any

commercial launch. Any how with the help of

this investment i.e. Rs. 20.000 million, the

farmer will fetch 132.61 2 million rupees. It

will also cut the import bill of the government

as is spent on edible oil.

Net present value (NPV) andbenefit cost ratio (BCR)

Under this project, the farming community

will be given in puts for laying out of

demonstration plots. The size of plot will be

from acre to one acre. So the number of

beneficiaries will be 1079 & 1404 (per

annum) as per following schedule:

Nos. of Plots Area

(in Kanals)

Total Area

to be brought

(in Acres)

Nos. of

Plots

Area

(in Kanals)

Total Area

to be brought

(in Acres)

300 8 300 300 8 300

250 6 188 250 6 188

255 5 159 255 5 159

266 4 133 276 4 138

1071 780 1081 785

Total number of beneficiaries will be 2152with an area of 1565 acres. The cost per unit

(i.e. one acre) comes to Rs. 12780.00 or Rs.

2223.00 on 1000 population of project

districts (Estimated population of project

districts is 89,97,000).


26/38

25

Internal financial rate of return(IFRR).

The project is developmental one.

Agriculture Sector is an economic sector

and the government launches its

development project to give boost to

economic growth. Government will not

have any internal financial rate of return yetthe beneficiaries i.e. farming community

will earn better from their fields through the

help of these educational activities to be

demonstrated in their fields for adoption of

better technology in qualitative as well as

quantitative terms.

Unit cost analysis. Rs. 12780 per acre (Cost of inputs + otheroperational costs = Rs. 11309 + 1471).

Break even point (BEP). Not applicable. Pay back period. The project will pay back to the beneficiary

on harvest. Total crop period is about 4

months.

Return on equity (ROE). The project is a profitable business and noliability rest either on service provider i.e.

government or on beneficiary. All the

expenses would be borne by the

government and services like labour,

watering, care, harvest etc is sole

responsibility of the farmers/borrowers. The

Department will extend its expertise in

shape of technical instructions and

concerned Agriculture Officer(s), Field

Assistant(s) would pay frequent visit to

make the highest yield/produce success.

Economic Analysis

Provide taxes and duties separately inthe capital and operating cost. From a report published by GlobalAgriculture Information Network (GAIN)

namely Pakistan Oilseeds and products

Annual 2011, that the government have

levied 16% Central Excise Duty and 3%

Income Tax.

The project inputs would pay usual taxes

levied by the government yet the produce

and its by products would share in to

national income through GST etc levied by

the government.


27/38

26

Net present value (NPV) and benefitCost Ratio (BCR).

Before calculating NPV of the project, it is necessary to evaluate the cost of production of the crop. The

project will only share costs of seed, chemical fertilizer and pesticides etc. Rest of the cost like services,

Water Charges, Transportation, FYM, Care of the Crop, Harvesting etc would be responsibility of

beneficiary. Per Acre Cost of Production of the Crop comes to Rs. 51667/- or for780 Acres 40.300

million 1st

year. The project share out of this cost would be Rs. 9.000 million (22% of total cost).Sr.No Operations / Inputs Average no.of

oprs/units/acre

Cost/Unit Cost/acre

Rs. Rs.

1 PREPARATORY TILLAGE

1.1 Deep ploughing 0.3 1000 300

1.2 Ploughing 2 500 1000

1.3 Planking 2 250 500

1.4 Leveling 1 250 250

2 Seed and Sowing Operations

2.1 Seed (Kg) 2 160 320

2.2 Seed treatment 1 1200 12002.3 SOWING

2.3.1 Ploughing 2 500 1000

2.3.2 Planking 2 250 500

2.3.3 Bund making (Man Days) 0.5 300 150

2.3.4 Charges for Pora/Kera or Tractor with Drill 1 500 500

3 FERTILIZER

3.1 Urea 2 1500 3000

3.2 DAP 1.5 4000 6000

3.3 Transportation 3.5 15 52.5

3.4 Fertilizer Application (M. day) 0.5 350 175

4 INTERCULTURE

4.1 Bar Harrow / Weeding

5 PLANT PROTECTION

5.1 Weedicides/Herbicides/Insecticide/Pesticides 1 1200 1200

6 IRRIGATION6.1 Canal (Water Rate) 100

6.2 Private tubewell (3 Hrs @ Rs.400/Hour) 4 1200 4800

7 LABOUR FOR IRRIGATION

7.1 Water course cleaning (M.day) 1 350 350

7.2 Labour Charges for irrigation (M.day) 1 350 350

8

FARM YARD MANURE INCLUDING TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION 50% (TORLLY

LOAD) 3 4000 12000

TOTAL (1 TO 8) 33747.5

9 MARKUP ON INVESTMENT @ 9% ON Rs. 10516 / 11062.5 FC 6 0

10 HARVESTING

10.1 Harvesting Charges (40 Kgs) 3 500 1500

10.2 Threshing Charges (1/12 of Produce) 42 160 6720

10.3 Threshing Chagres (Manual M.day)

11 LAND RENT FOR 6 MONTHS @ 18000/PA 6 1500 9000

12

MANAGEMENT CHARGES FOR 6 MONTHS OF A MANADER @ 10000 PM FOR 100

ACERS 6 100 600

13 AGRICULTURE INCOME TAX 6 MONTHS 100

14 GROSS COST (Items 1 to 13) 51667.5

15 VALUE OF BHOOSA 0

16 NET CULTIVATION COST (Items 14-15) INCLUDING LAND RENT 51667.5

17 YEILD PER ACER (Kgs) 506

18 COST PER 40 kgs AT FARM LEVEL 40 120 4800

19 MARKETING EXPENSES (Rs/40 Kgs) 506 0.4 202.4

20 Cost Per 40 Kgs at Mandi gate 65780

21 Investment Incentive @ 25% 16445

22 Support Price Recommended (40 Kgs) 7200

2011-12

On the basis of above and project cost following are the NPV of the project.


28/38

27

Investment/

2011-12

Investment/ 2012-

13

Discount Rate : 6.33% 11.00%

Period (Year) : 5 5

Initial Cash Flow : 9,000,000.00 11,000,000.00

Project NPV : 53,163,154.64 63,132,514.42

Difference : 44,163,154.64 52,132,514.42

Percentage : 490.70% 473.93%

Y Cashflow Y Cashflow

0 (9,000,000.00) 0 (11,000,000.00)

1 11,840,400.00 1 13,703,745.00

2 13,616,460.00 2 15,759,306.75

3 15,658,929.00 3 18,123,202.76

4 18,007,768.35 4 20,841,683.18

5 20,708,933.60 5 23,967,935.65

NET PRESENT VALUE

The total income to be derived to the farmer from the estimated produce of canola (506 kg/acre) @ Rs. 120/- per

Kg on farm gate 60720/-; On whole sale price i.e. on Mandi Gate @ Rs. 130/- per Kg it would be Rs. 65780/- and

consumer price it would be Rs. 80960/-. Difference between cost of production and consumer price of one acre

produce Rs. 29292.50.

Internal economic rate of return (IERR). From the area to be brought by the farmingcommunity under canola crop following produceis estimated. This produce have a potential to

bring the change and rationalize demand and

supply. Canola is rich in oil contents and have

40% of the oil at an average. The project will

cover 2341 acres of land under the crop which

would yield 1184.55 metric tonnes. 40% of this

produce if procured as seed it will cover an area

of about 473881 acres which on further

dissemination will yield as fetch 299691 liters of

canola oil. This quantity will fulfil the

requirements of which will feed more than 10703persons (@ 28 kg/head per annum).

S.No. Particulars Unit Qty

1 Area To be covered under the project Acres 1,565.00

2 Estimated Produce @ 506 kgs/acre M.Tonns 791.89

3 40% of produce (i.e. 316.76 tonnes) to be used as seed will

cover an area under crop (Seed Rate @ 2 kgs/acre)

Acres 158,380.00

4 Estimated Produce of persumed area under crop M.Tonns 80,140.28

5 Estimated Edible oil quantity to be obtained from 40% of the

produce (Sr. No. 4)

M.Tonns 12,822.44

6 Per Capita Consumption kg/one/annum 28.00

7 Edible Oil to be available for human consumption persons 457,944.46


29/38

28

Presumed IERR of the Project is as under:

Value

17,668,000Rs.

2,332,000Rs.

Variable

N/A

1,565

29,292Rs.

6%

Term in

years Input Cost Fixed Costs Total

Money saved

by project

New sales

generated

by project

Equipment

sales Total Cash flows

0 8,206,000Rs. 794,000Rs. 9,000,000Rs. -Rs. -Rs. -Rs. -Rs. (9,000,000)Rs.

1 9,462,000 1,538,000 11,000,000 0 63,148,800 63,148,800 52,148,800

2 10,881,300 1,768,700 12,650,000 0 73,086,640 73,086,640 60,436,640

3 12,513,495 2,034,005 14,547,500 0 84,049,636 84,049,636 69,502,136

4 14,390,519 2,339,106 16,729,625 0 96,657,081 96,657,081 79,927,456

5 16,549,097 2,689,972 19,239,069 0 111,155,644 111,155,644 91,916,575

6 19,031,462 3,093,467 22,124,929 0 127,828,990 0 127,828,990 105,704,061

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0Net Cash Flow = 450,635,668Rs.

IRR = 595.16%

Operational Costs

Inputs Cos t

Fixed costs

Profit ratio

Expenses Income

Maintenance

Depreciation

New sa les (Produce Acr)

Profit per sale


30/38

29

Foreign Exchange rate of the project(Brunos Ratio) for import substitute

and export oriented projects.

Not applicable

Employment analysis:

Employment generation (directand indirect).

Though there is no direct employment underthe project itself as existing staff will render

the duties in addition to their own/mandatory

duties, yet through change in agriculture and

bringing the new area under cultivation the

community should have engage casual

labour/farm labour at the ratio of 4 persons

per 100 acres so 6335 persons would get

jobs if engaged as farm labour for the total

presumed area i.e. 158380 acres.

Sensitivity analysis:

Impact of delays o project costand viability.

The funds must be released soon after start of

fiscal in full and not in the piece meal. Delay

in releases would adversely affect the project

and will make the achievement difficult even

impossible.

12.a) Implementation Schedule:

Indicate starting and completiondate of the project.

October 2011 to June 2016.

Item-wise/year wiseimplementation schedule in line

chart co-related with the phasing

of physical activities.


31/38

30

13. Maintenance structure andmanpower requirements:

Administrative arrangements forimplementation of project.

The Director General Agriculture

(Extension) will administer all project

activities through the assistance of Dy.

Director P&D & his staff at DirectorateGeneral Agriculture (Extension) Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa.

The manpower requirements byskills/profession during

execution and operation of the

project.

The required man power by skill is

available with the department i.e. District

Officer(s) Agriculture, Agriculture Officers,

Field Assistants of the concerned / project

district(s).

The job description,qualification, experience, ageand salary of each job may be

provided.

1. DISTRICT DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE:DDA acts as over all in charge of

Agriculture (Extension) Activities in his

district. He acts as executive/

operational body. Implements plans,

policy of the government regarding

agriculture. He bridges farming

community and Agricultural Scientists

and recommendations of the agricultural

scientists are disseminated through a

number of direct/indirect methods. He

uses extension tools for getting highesteconomical yield of the crops. He

Swabi Mardan BunerLakki

MarwatDIKhan Tank Bannu Karak Haripur

2011-12 85 85 80 85 90 85 90 90 902012-13 85 85 80 85 90 90 90 90 90

85 85

80

85

90

85

90 90 90

85 85

80

85

90 90 90 90 90

Demonstration Plots to Be Laid Out (Area in Acres)

2011-12 2012-13


32/38

31

maintains cropping pattern in his

respective district. He acts as facilitator

to the farming community.

2. AGRICULTURE OFFICER:An agriculture graduate, team leader of

the Extension Work Force, who is

responsible for implementation of the

work plan (Kharif & Rabi Action plan

chalked out by the government of

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Agriculture

(Extension Department). Executes

Developmental activities of ADP/ Non

ADP Schemes launches by the Federal/

Provincial and District Governments.

3. AGRICULTURE INSPECTOR/FIELDASSISTANT:

These are important /direct links of

Extension works with the farming

community. These are Diploma holders

in Agriculture. They make the dreams

of the farming community true through

assistance / guide lines extended to the

grower from time to time. These are

front line workers and are posted at

union council level.

14.Additional projects/decisionrequired:

It is necessary to make the marketing of the

produce easy, convenient and hassle free.

The produce should further be disposed off

through oil extraction. It is recommended

that a separate project may be initiated for

establishment of oil extraction units in the

project districts so the farming community

may easily dispose its produce off in theirown districts. For the purpose government

should have contacted to the investors

keeping in view the produce and span of

project activities, adoption of crop

incorporating it in the cropping pattern of

farming community on a larger scale as the

production would be sufficient for

commercial usage.


33/38

32

15.Certificate The name, designation and phone # of the

officer responsible for preparing and

checking be provided. It may also be

confirmed that PC-I has been prepared as

per instructions issued by the PlanningCommission for the preparation of PC-I for

Production Sector projects.

The PC-I along with certificate must be signed by

the Principal Accounting Officer to ensure its

ownership.

It is certified that the project proposal has been prepared

on the basis of Instructions provided by the Planning

Commission for the preparation of PC-1 for production

sector project.

Prepared: (Farhat Abbas Durrani)

Development Assistant DGA(E)

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar

(03339333459)

Checked by: (Dr. Fayaz-ud-Din Qazi)

Dy. Director Planning & Monitoring

DGA (E) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar

(03339139029)

(Muhammad Taslim)

Director General Agric.Extn.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar.(0314 947 4490)

Approved by: (Muhammad Afsar Khan)

Secretary to the Govt. Of Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa, Agric. Livestoci & Coop.

Deptt. Peshawar.


34/38

33

PE&DDSCHEME MONITOR AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

P.C.1 S.K.I.M.

(Scheme Key Indicator Matrix)

a. Identification of Scheme PE&DD/M&E PC-1Page 1/3Code + Title :

District:

579-110121-Enhancement of Edible Oil

through Sowing of Canola in Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa.

Checked by:

Swabi, Mardan, Bunir, Lakki, DIKhan,

Tank, Bannu, Karak and Haripur.Sector: Agriculture Name Mohammad Taslim

Sub Sector Agriculture Extension Position Director General,Agriculture Extension,KPKCategory Agriculture Mechanization

Tick as appropriate: Approved by:

Civil

WorkMisc:

On Farm Water Management Name (Muhammad Afsar Khan)

Agriculture Extension Position Secretary to Govt. Of KPK

Agriculture Research Agriculture Deptt. KPK

Planning & Development Please encircle correct answer:

Live stock & Dairy Dev:

Veterinary Research Foreign Aided Project: No

Fruit & Veg: Dev. Board Name of donor/Foreign

Grant/foreign loan

N.A

Cooperative

Composite Scheme. No

If yes, number ofindividual components

NAImplementation Dates for this PC-1

Project starting date Sep 2011Expected completion date 30th Jun, 2013Proposed Duration in month 22 MonthsNo. Of Financial Years involved 2 years

PC-1 Prepared by:

Name Farhat Abbas Durrani

PositionDev. Assistant

Directorate General Agri. (E)

Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Peshawar.

Date

SignatureSponsoring Agency/Line Dept. Executing Agency

1b. Revision Status 1c. General Remarks

Revised PC-1 or data? Yes / No For Ongoing Schemes:

If Yes Forum approval date.

Number of Revisions so far. Admn: approval date.

Date Original PC1 Sanctioned Technical Sanction Date

Date of 1st Start of Project Technical Sanction Cost.

Total Project duration from start.

Total Number of Financial Years TakenIf the scheme is revised then indicate the starting date of the revision, completion date as per revision, and the No. of additional months and financial years to be taken.


35/38

34

Project: Enhancement of Edible Oil through Sowing of Canola in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.Sector Agriculture Sub Sector: Agriculture ExtensionCategory Miscellaneous

3 Physcal Targetss

Sr. No. Key indicator 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Total 1st 2nd 3rd

Laying out of

Canola D/PlotsAcres 1565 100% 780 1,565 - - - 1,565 780 1,565 2,345

i. Swabi Acres 170 11% 85 170 - - - 170 85 170 255

ii. Mardan Acres 170 100% 85 170 - - - 170 85 170 255

iii. Buner Acres 160 100% 80 160 - - - 160 80 160 240

iv. Lakki Acres 170 106% 85 170 - - - 170 85 170 255

v. DIKhan Acres 180 100% 90 180 - - - 180 90 180 270

vi. Tank Acres 175 94% 85 175 - - - 175 85 175 260

vii. Bannu Acres 180 97% 90 180 - - - 180 90 180 270

viii. Karak Acres 180 94% 90 180 - - - 180 90 180 270

ix. Haripur Acres 180 94% 90 180 - - - 180 90 180 270

1

Ex-post cumulative target for

three years after copletion

Unit of

measure-

ment

Overall

scheme

targets

Overall

Indic. Of

Scheme/

weight

Cumulative target by financial year

Signatures of approving body

Note:

Fill in the blanks in table. Figures in the last quarter/year should always coincide with figures in overall scheme target column.Weights are in percentages and should always add up to 100% They are usually pre-set but can be modified if there is a need.

The weights should always reflect the relative importance of the indicator/activity/output in the total of the scheme.

The PC-1 SKIM has to be signed and annexed to the PC1 and to the Administrative Approval forum.


36/38

35

Important Notes:

1. All costs are in Million of Pakistan Rupees. The cost breakdown should not be cumulative.Add more columns if necessary.2. Target setting is to be done always by financial year. This means that a scheme of 10 months

duration can still take 2 financial years to complete for instance if it is starts in April.

PE&DD/M&E PC-1

Page 3/3 empty.wk3

Local

in Rs. (M)

F.E.C.

In Rs. (M)

Local

in Rs. (M)

F.E.C.

In Rs. (M)

Local

in Rs. (M)

F.E.C.

In Rs. (M)

i.Capital - - - - - -

ii. Revenue 9.000 - 11.000 - 20.000 -

iii. Total 9.000 - 11.000 - 20.000 -

TotalSummary

Estimated Cost

Financial Year 1st Financial Year 2nd

Note:

Capital (Code) refers to the works accounts: revenue (8) to all other accounts.

(*) currency used: Pak: Rupees Exchanged Used: N.A.

Signature


37/38

36

Check List For Appraisal of PC-1

(To be attached to PC-1 Form)

1. Preliminary Checks.

S/No: Points Line Deptt. ADSC/DSC/PDWP

1 Is the Scheme in the ADP? Yes/No Yes/No

2 Is the project justified for funding

(according to policy guidelines)?

Yes/No Yes/No

3 Is it also funded by the FederalGovernment?

Yes/No Yes/No

4Is there another scheme of the same

nature in this locality/area?

Yes/No Yes/No

5If so, has adequate justification for

implementing the scheme been given

in the PC-1 form?

Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A

6 Has a feasibility study been conducted?

If yes, summarise findings in working paper.

Yes/No Yes/No/N.A

7Has the feasibility study looked at the

consequences of the project for women;

advantages/disadvantages?


8 Has the PC-1 Form has been prepared

according to the proper format?


9Have the gander-specific guidelines

satisfactorily been used?


10 Is the PC-1 form complete in every respect? Yes/No Yes/No

11

Are plans and drawings for the project

included?

Yes/No Yes/No

12 Building (housing/offices) projects; do they

include facilities for women?


13 Is land available? Yes/No/NA Yes/No

14Has it been mentioned in the PC-1 Form

whether the site selected is convenientfor women/children?

Yes/No/NA Yes/No

Comments by Line Department,

if any.

Comments by ADSC/DSC/PDWP, if any

Assessment of PC-1

Comments by the ADSC/DSC/PDWP

Good, needs further

clarification, unacceptable


38/38

2. Overall and General checks:

1Does the PC-1 Form clearly explain the

specific problems to be addressed?

Yes/No

2 Has the target-group been involved inthe identification of the problems?

Yes/No

3If women are a part of the target-grouphave they been involved in the

identification of problems?

Yes/No

4 Is it explained how the scheme will help

in solving these problems?

Yes/No

5 Have special measures been proposed to

solve the problems of Women?

Yes/No/N.A

6 Have objectives been formulated in precise

and correct terms?

Yes/No

7 Are objectives of the scheme related to

the overall objectives of the sector?

Yes/No

8

Are the objectives of the scheme related

to the WID-objectives of the sector, the

Five Year Plan and / or other relevant

policy papers?

Yes/No/N.A

9Has the target-group been well defined?

(Women/men/boy/girls/landless/small

farmers etc.)

Yes/No

10

Have the effects and impact (long term

changes): Benefits/disadvantages of the scheme

on the development of women beenindicated? If yes, summarise findings in

working paper.

Yes/No

11

If possible negative consequences for

women have been identified, have

special measures been taken toovercome them?

Yes/No

12

Have the effects and impact (long term

changes; Benefit / disadvantages) of the

schemeon the environment been indicated?

If yes, sumarise findings in working paper.

Yes/No

Comments by Line Department, if any.

Comments by ADSC/DSC/PDWP, if any

Assessment of PC-1

Comments by the ADSC/DSC/PDWP

Good, needs further

clarification, unacceptable

Date post:	07-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	farhat-abbas-durrani
View:	226 times
Download:	1 times

PC1 Edible Oil Canola

Documents