Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dr-abhas-mitra |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 6
7/30/2019 PCVaidya
1/6
In1998,Isubmittedtwopapersentitled
1. ``FinalStateofSphericalGravitationalCollapseandLikelySourceofGammaRayBursts:A. Mitra (arXiv:astroph/9803014)
2. ``TowardstheFinalStateofSphericalGravitationalCollapseandLikelySourceofGammaRayBursts
A. Mitra (arXiv:astroph/9803013)ToPhys.Rev.Lett.Thesetwopapersfirstclaimedthatforphysicalgravitationalcollapse,no
trappedsurfaceorblackholeisformedinfinitepropertime.Ontheotherhand,the
collapsingobjectlosesmassenergyinsuchamannerthattrappedsurfaceformationis
avoidedandasymptotically,forcontinuedcollapse,thecollapsingstarwouldtendtobea
zeromassBlackHole,theborderlinebetweena``NakedSingularityanda``BlackHole
PRLrefereecommentswerebetterthatwhatIhadexpected;ofcoursetheywerenot
accepted.ThenIsentthemtoProf.P.C.Vaidya,whostartedtheconceptofradiative
physicalgravitationalcollapse.LaterImethiminperson.Hefoundmymanuscripttobe
alrightbothmathematically&physically.Iamverygratefultohim.
Hereisthetextofhisresponsesansmaths.
7/30/2019 PCVaidya
2/6
Prof.P.C.Vaidya 34Shardanagar
TelNo:(079) 6610893 Ahmedabad380007
May4,1998
DearDrMitra,
YourspeedpostletterreachedmeonMay2nd,yourconclusioninthefirstpaperthatattheendofthe
gravitationalcollapse,allthematterofthecontractingsphereisconvertedintoradiationremembered
meofsomeearlierwork.ThefirstparagraphofanotepublishedinCurrentSciences28,399(1959)[a
reprintofwhichisenclosedherewith]isreproducedbelow:
``FollowingVaidya1,Raychaudhury2 firstconsideredthecaseofamassparticlebeingcompletely
annihilatedandconvertedintoradiation.Hefoundthatsuchaprocesscouldnotbeadequately
describedbythefieldequationsofGTR(GeneralTheoryofRelativity).However Israel3 foundthatthe
relativityequationsareadequatetodescribesuchaprocessofcompleteconversionofamassparticle
intoradiationandhehasgivenamodelforthesame.
(Ref:Vaidya1,Raychaudhry2,andIsrael3willbefoundintheattachedreprint)
So,onethingisclear.Mathematicallyyouareonrightlines.
IhavegonethroughyourfirstpaperaswellyourreplytoRefereeA.Asfarasmathematicalconceptsare
concerned,Iamsatisfiedthatyouseemtobecorrect.PleaselookintoIsraelspapermentionedabove
asacheckonthispoint.
AsregardsremarkofRefereeAinmyfirstsentenceofPARA4,Iwouldsaythat:
ForradiationflowinginemptyspaceEij=qk
ikjwherek
iisnotonlyanullvectorbutageodesicvector
i.e.,
(MathsOmitted)
Butforradiationflowingthroughmatter,thetracksofflowingradiationarenullcurvesallrightbutthey
arenotnullgeodesics.ThusinteractionofradiationwithmatteristakencareofinthegeometryofGTR
bypostulatinganonzeroaccelerationofphotons(ki;kj 0).Thecoefficientin(4)willincludetheeffect
ofinteractionofmatterwithradiationflowingthroughit.
ImayaddthatIhavederivedanexactsolutionofEinsteinEquationsofGRTdescribingsphericalgravitationalcollapseinwhichradiationisflowingout.ThepaperispublishedinAstrophysicalJournal
Vaidya,P.C.,ApJ144,943(1965)
Idonothaveanyreprintsofthatpaperleftwithmenow.
7/30/2019 PCVaidya
3/6
YouwillseefromthisletterthatIammoreamathematicianthananastrophysicistoranastronomer
(Seeattachedreprintentitled:``Me,anAstronomer!)
AndsomyopinionisthatyourtreatmentofEquationsofGRT,theirsolutionsandinterpretationsof
solutionsallappearsoundtomemathematically.
Wishyouallthebestinyourendeavours
Yourssincerely
P.C.Vaidya (Signature)
7/30/2019 PCVaidya
4/6
7/30/2019 PCVaidya
5/6
7/30/2019 PCVaidya
6/6