PEAK OIL DEMAND: WHAT COULD CAUSE IT? HOW CLOSE IS IT? IEEJ OCTOBER 2, 2017 MICHAEL C. LYNCH [email protected]
1
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
THE BOOK IS FINALLY HERE!
FUNDAMENTAL TAKEAWAY: REALITY CAN BE COMPLEX, AND BASIC ARGUMENTS CAN BE WRONG OR MISUNDERSTOOD. EXPERIENCE VALUABLE, IN-DEPTH RESEARCH AVOIDS MISTAKES, INDEPENDENT THINKING CAN BE USEFUL
2
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
COULD OIL DEMAND PEAK? PEAK OIL SUPPLY ARGUMENTS FALLACIOUS ◦ PEAK OIL DEMAND NOT BE VALID
POLICY ◦ CLIMATE CHANGE WILL MEAN REDUCED DEMAND ◦ PARIS ACCORDS SEVERELY LIMIT FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION
TECHNOLOGY ◦ ADVANCES IN ‘CLEANTECH’ ARE RAPID: BIOFUELS, MATERIALS ◦ BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES CLOSE TO BREAKTHROUGH
ECONOMICS ◦ DEMOGRAPHICS AND PRICE ◦ OIL VS NATURAL GAS
3
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
THE ARGUMENT (DÉJÀ VU?) JOE ROMM 2017: ◦ In December the nations of the world agreed unanimously in Paris to leave most of the world fossil fuels
in the ground. ◦ Oil demand has been declining in developed countries for over a decade. ◦ Electric vehicle sales are exploding around the world, especially China. ◦ Battery prices are continuing their unexpectedly rapid price drop. ◦ Tesla and Chevy now say their new 200-mile-range EV could cost Americans $30,000 — a game-changing
price.”
“I wasn’t going to post on this since I have blogged endlessly on the painfully obvious reality that we are at or near the peak (oil supply).” JOE ROMM 2009
4
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
STONE AGE ENDED 4000 YEARS AGO, BUT…
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
CRUSHED STONE PRODUCTION IN US
5
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE PEAK
LARGE AMOUNTS OF FOSSIL FUELS MUST BE LEFT IN GROUND ◦ THOSE RESERVES THUS WORTHLESS ◦ THUS, STOCK PRICES SHOULD BE DISCOUNTED ◦ ALSO, DIVERSTITURE SHOULD BE DONE FOR ECONOMIC REASONS
◦ NOT JUST MORAL/POLITICAL
PROMOTED PRIMARILY BY CLIMATE ACTIVISTS ◦ NY CASE AGAINST EXXON
9
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
EXTREME CASE: 80% OF RESOURCE UNUSABLE
SOURCE: BRAD JOHNSON, THINKPROGRESS.ORG, 2012.
10
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
CO2 EMISSIONS: PROGRESS?
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
GLOBAL CO2 EMISSIONS
HANSEN
KYOTO COP1
UNFCCC AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH
THE 11TH HOUR
11
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
KYOTO PROTOCAL HAS SEEN PROGRESS
10000.0
10500.0
11000.0
11500.0
12000.0
12500.0
13000.0
13500.0
14000.0
14500.0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
OECD EMISSIONS
KYOTO TARGET ROUGHLY HALF THE TARGET WAS ACHIEVED
12
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES DRIVEN BY WEATHER, NOT CLIMATE, IDEOLOGY MORE THAN SCIENCE
HOPE FOR RATIONAL, BUT DON’T ASSUME
RATIONAL: CARBON TAXES, CAP AND TRADE
IRRATIONAL: MANDATES, SUBSIDIES (ESP BEV), LARGE-SCALE BIOFUEL IN OECD
POSSIBLE: ◦ SUBSIDIES TO FAVORED GROUPS
◦ FARMERS, RENEWABLES, ELECTRIC VEHICLES
◦ REGULATIONS ◦ EFFICIENCY STANDARDS, BIOFUELS
◦ PROMOTIONAL ◦ NUCLEAR?
13
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
IMPACT ON OIL INDUSTRY: CARBON TAXES
BIGGEST HIT TO COAL
BIGGEST WINNERS ◦ EFFICIENCY, GAS, WIND, NUCLEAR, SOLAR ◦ ELECTRONICS: SENSORS, SOFTWARE
WHAT HIT TO GASOLINE DEMAND?
GAMING ◦ CHINA COULD ATTRACT ENERGY-INTENSIVE INDUSTRY
16
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
$100/ton of CO2 roughly $1/gallon gasoline
ONLY FINLAND, NORWAY AND SWEDEN OVER $25/TON. $100/TON REDUCES US DEMAND BY 20% IN 20 YEARS.
18
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
RATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY
END SUBSIDIES ◦ MAX 3.7 MB/D OF OIL DEMAND REDUCTION
TAX CARBON ◦ 2-4 MB/D OF OIL DEMAND REDUCTION AFTER 10-15 YEARS
LIKELY IN TEN YEARS: 2-3 MB/D REDUCTION TOTAL
ABANDON EV SUBSIDIES IN FAVOR OF RESEARCH ◦ LESS BIOFUELS
SCRAP RENEWABLE MANDATES
PROMOTE NUCLEAR, EFFICIENCY, RESEARCH IN NEW TECHNOLOGIES ◦ GAS FOR CHINA AND INDIA
19
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
PREVIOUS PEAK GASOLINE DEMAND
Exxon Mobil Corp. CEO Rex Tillerson said this month that U.S. gasoline demand peaked in 2007. 2009
2010 EIA Gasoline demand and price forecast
(demand in mb/d, price in cents/gal)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
8.9
8.95
9
9.05
9.1
9.15
9.2
9.25
9.3
9.35
9.4
2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
DEMAND MB/D PRICE C/GAL
23
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
ACTUAL GASOLINE DEMAND “Thirst for oil returns in wealthy nations” FT 9/2017
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
24
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
US TRAVEL HAS SLOWED AIR PASSENGER MILES: ◦ 1960-2000: 7.3% PER YEAR GROWTH ◦ 2000-2014: 1.2% PER YEAR GROWTH
HIGHWAY MILES ◦ 1960-2000: 3.24% PER YEAR GROWTH ◦ 2000-2014: -0.3 PER YEAR DECLINE
2008 FISCAL CRISIS MAY BE PARTLY TO BLAME
25
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
DEMOGRAPHICS AND OIL DEMAND (JAPAN)
0.0E+00
2.0E+07
4.0E+07
6.0E+07
8.0E+07
1.0E+08
1.2E+08
1.4E+08
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
TB/D
OIL CONSUMPTION TB/D POPULATION
26
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
AUTOMOTIVE REVOLUTION? RETHINKX VIEW REAL WORLD
TOKYO:
MOST EXPENSIVE PLACE TO OWN CARS
GREAT MASS TRANSIT
TERRIFIC TAXI SERVICE
CARS REGISTERED: 3,140,651
27
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
THE REVOLUTION: TECHNOLOGY AND/OR POLICY
NEW TECHNOLOGIES ◦ STATIONARY:
◦ SOLAR, WIND, ADVANCED NUCLEAR ◦ BATTERIES FOR BACKUP
◦ MOBILE ◦ BATTERIES (EV) ◦ AUVS
DEMOGRAPHICS
POLICIES (CLIMATE CHANGE PRIMARILY)
YIELDS: ◦ PEAK OIL DEMAND
100% RENEWABLE ◦ SMART GRID, DECENTRALIZED ◦ CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES
29
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
PREDICTIONS OF PARITY BETWEEN BEV AND ICE
Battery Parity Published Source Price $/kwh Reached Where
2012 McKinsey 250 <2020 2015 Nyqvist 150 2025-2030 2016 UBS 160 2021 Europe 2016 UBS 160 2025 China 2017 UBS 2018 Europe 2017 UBS 2021 China 2017 UBS 2025 U.S. 2017 BP 50-150 2025-2035
2017 Carbon-Tracker 150-300 2020
2017 BNEF 2025 2017 Statoil 2025
30
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
CLINTON’S SUPERCAR 2000
(Carson and Vaitheeswaran are adamant that the Prius is not the car of the future, though they give Toyota high marks for forward thinking.) GM PRECEPT AND FORD PRODIGY
32
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
BATTERY COST UNCERTAINTY “How Soon Can Tesla Get Battery Cell Costs Below $100 per Kilowatt-Hour?
Its $100 per kilowatt-hour goal could be reached sooner than expected—and well ahead of the competition.” (2014)
“Tesla’s announced battery cost to the consumer is $430 per kWh for the 7 kWh pack and $350 per kWh for the 10 kWh pack, so it’s logical to surmise the batteries cost Tesla $300 per kWh, which gives the company a window of between $50-130 per kWh to account for any additional costs and a profit margin.” MIT 2015
34
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
ELECTRONICS IS EASY, CHEMISTRY IS HARD
CAR BATTERY ◦ Same size, power in 3 decades
1981: Memory=128K
2011: Memory = 4GB
37
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
SPOT THE WINNER: 1910 Model T Horse
Horsepower 20 1 Speed 35-40 10-17 Passengers 2-7 1 to 2 Cargo Capacity (lbs) 2000 200-300 Exhaust n.a. 22 lb manure Range 200 40 Price 4740 2280 Fuel Cost/year 1752 840
38
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
ELECTRIC VEHICLE: ◦ $10K EXTRA ◦ 1/3-1/2 LESS EMISSIONS ◦ RECHARGING: 30 MINUTES TO 9 HOURS ◦ RANGE: 100-200 MILES, +/- 50%
HYBRID VEHICLE ◦ $3K EXTRA ◦ 1/3 LESS EMISSIONS ◦ REFILL 5 MINUTES ◦ RANGE: 300-400 MILES
ICE VEHICLE ◦ NO EXTRA, NO EMISSIONS SAVINGS ◦ REFILL 5 MINUTES ◦ RANGE: 300-400 MILES
39
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
PEAK DEMAND VS PRICE IMPACT BNEF THINKS 2-3 MB/D OF LOST DEMAND YIELDS PRICE CRASH ◦ KIND OF SIMPLISITIC
WEAKER DEMAND WOULD PRESSURE PRICES ◦ EXCEPT IF ITS DUE TO HIGHER PRICES
PRICE EXPECTATIONS TOO HIGH ALREADY (IMHO)
40
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
PRICE FORECASTS IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
DOE REF DOE LO IEA NP IEA CP IEA 450 OPEC ESAI SEER GI EVA ARROWHEAD ACTUAL
DOE HIGH PRICE SCENARIO OMITTED FOR PURPOSES OF CLARITY. 42
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
…CAVEAT: 2014 FORECASTS (WHEN OIL WAS $100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
ACTUAL DOE IEA SEER
43
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
ULTIMATELY RIGHT NOW, MORE OIL USE: ◦ GROWING INCOMES ◦ LOW OIL PRICES ◦ REDUCE DEFORESTATION, HABITAT LOSS
PEAK IN OIL DEMAND WOULD REQUIRE ◦ LARGE CARBON TAXES ◦ HUGE ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUBSIDIES ◦ SOME MAJOR TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH
◦ SUPERCAPACITORS ◦ FUEL CELL ◦ REALLY CHEAP BIOMASS OR SOLAR
IMPACT ON CURRENT RESERVE VALUES NIL
IMPACT ON BUSINESS IN NEXT TWO DECADES LESS CLEAR ◦ STILL WAITING FOR MY FLYING CAR—BUT MAYBE NOT MUCH LONGER
44
IEEJ:October 2017 © IEEJ2017
Contact :[email protected]