+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: samlagrone
View: 227 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend

of 22

Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    1/22

    Naval Submarine League Symposium

    Rear Admiral David JohnsonProgram Executive Officer, Submarines

    24 October 2013

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    2/22

    For Today

    VIRGINIA Class

    OHIO Replacement

    Payloads

    MK48 Heavyweight Torpedo Restart

    AWESUM

    Universal Launched and Recovery Module

    Surface Ship Torpedo Defense

    Impacts of Sequestration and the Continuing Resolution

    2PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    3/22

    The VIRGINIA Class

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    4/22

    VIRGINIA Class Deliveries

    4

    All 6 Block II VIRGINIA Class submarines have been delivered early to contract

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    5/22

    Velocity to the Fleet

    0.70

    0.75

    0.80

    0.85

    0.90

    0.95

    1.00

    774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783

    67

    9

    7 8

    11

    13 13

    1615

    2

    4

    2

    43

    2

    12

    1

    9

    11 11 11 11

    13

    14

    15

    16 16

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783

    UNSAT

    DEGRADED

    SAT

    0.00

    500.00

    1000.00

    1500.00

    2000.00

    2500.00

    3000.00

    774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783

    5

    SAT (0.80 - 1.00)DEGRADED (0.60 - 0.79)UNSAT (0.00 - 0.59)

    Average Scores Number of Areas Graded / Scored

    Deferrals at Delivery Combined 3G & 7G Time to Fleet Readiness Training Plan

    IOT&E

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784

    PSA Duration

    Delivery to FRTP

    Achieved Plan

    Months

    On Track to Achieve 12 Months From Delivery to FRTPLess Than 6 Years from Construction Start to Fleet Ready Asset

    Block III 6 Months orLess PSAs, Deliver

    with Modern CombatSystems (TI-10 / TI-14)

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    6/22

    VIRGINIA Payload ModulesUnder Review

    Evolved Baseline (~91)(Fwd of NFO)

    Full Diameter Concept (~70)(Fwd of Midspan)

    2012 Baseline Concept (~97)(Fwd of NFO)

    Full Diameter Concept (~70)(Fwd of NFO)

    Midspan Concept (~88)(Aft of Midspan)

    Internal cylindrical bananaflasks

    Simplified battery extension One less PH frame

    Two vice three new blkhds No hovering sys relocation Single internal spherical flask No new Logistics Plug

    opening 350 sq-ft reconfigurable

    space

    Shortest ship option Longer payload tube Simplified hull structure Internal compensation tank 335 sq-ft reconfigurable

    space Baseline LWWAA spacing

    Least amount of baseline shipdisruption

    No impact to weaponshipping; diesel exhaust;LOT

    Increased LWWAA spacing

    6PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    7/22

    OHIO Replacement Program

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    8/22

    OHIO Replacement Schedule

    8PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

    First OHIO

    Replacement

    Strategic

    Deterrent

    Patrol

    008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032

    008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032

    Component Development / Component Qualification

    Ship Construction Design Disclosure and NC Data

    Sys Definition Docs

    Lead Ship Construction

    Sys Descrip & Rev A Diagrams

    Ship Specifications

    Research, Development and Prototyping for Lead Ship Design

    Ship Detailed Arrangements

    Lead Ship T&E

    T&E / PSA / DASO

    AP / LLTM

    Fiscal Year

    Lead

    Ship

    Authorization

    JROC

    CDD

    d 9/26/13

    Navy

    Approved

    CDD

    First OHIO Class SSBN Retires

    Second OHIO Class SSBN Retires

    Third OHIO Class SSBN Retires

    Fourth OHIO Class SSBN Retires

    Fifth OHIO Class SSBN Retires

    Sixth OHIO Class SSBN Retires

    Technology

    Development

    Phase

    MS-BTODAY

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    9/22

    OHIO Replacement Program

    9

    Characteristic OHIO [726] OHIO Replacement*

    Length 559 ft ~560 ftDiameter 42 ft 43 ft

    # of Missile Tubes 24 16

    Missile Tube Diameter 87" 87"

    Displacement 18,7400 LT ~20,800 LT*2012-1 Baseline

    FairwaterPlanes

    Centerline Access Sail

    Scaled VIRGINIA-Like LAB

    Space and Weight forLarge Flank Array

    VIRGINIA Class HullTreatments

    Electric Drive andLife of Ship Core

    X-Stern

    16 x 87 Missile Tubes(D5-LE SWS) in the Common

    Missile Compartment (CMC)

    Modular Construction

    Scaled VIRGINIA-Like Propulsor

    VIRGINIA-LikeCombat System

    Scaled for SSBN Mission

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    10/22

    Smart Procurement

    10PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

    FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33 FY34 FY35 FY36 FY37 FY38 FY39 FY40 FY41 FY42 FY43

    Attack

    Submarines2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1

    FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33 FY34 FY35 FY36 FY37

    OHIO Replacement 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0

    FY20142043 Long Range Naval Vessel Construction Plan

    Blk IV

    10 ships

    Blk V

    10 ships

    Blk VI

    7 ships

    Blk VII

    6 ships

    Blk I

    1 ships

    Blk II

    4 ships

    Blk IV

    2 ships

    Blk III

    5 ships

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    11/22

    OHIO ReplacementR&D Design Contract Overview

    OHIO Replacement contract represents a significant departure from historical norms:

    LOE and deliverables in a CPFF incentivized contract

    Innovative fee structure - EB must earn profit through measured performance

    Lower fixed fee - labor and material

    Deferred Incentive Pool ensures Government will not pay for unrealized cost reductions

    Incentives tied to cost reductions in:

    NRE Construction

    O&S

    Early design work in a completion contract environment

    Period of performance spans five-years (FY 2013-2017) with ~$2B if all optionsexercised

    First major OHIO Replacement specific contract, outside of CMC

    Navy will take delivery of complete ship spec package and complete set ofSystem Descriptions (SDs)

    Navy will also take delivery of over 1000 disclosures and over 2000 arrangements

    Incentive structure ties current design yard performance to follow on contract

    11PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    12/22

    OHIO Replacement ProgramRecent Major Accomplishments

    12

    Testing and Development

    Rotary captive model maneuvering test topredict ship hydrodynamic characteristics (Apr2013)

    Strategic Weapons System Ashoretest facility construction groundbreaking,Cape Canaveral, FL (Jun 2013)

    Full scale shaft bearing test facility

    construction completed and shakedown testingunderway, Key West, FL (Jul 2013)

    Superstructure hydro testing (Aug 2013)

    Contracts and Planning

    R&D design contract awarded (Dec 2012) Placed contract for long lead time material for

    UK First of Class and U.S. First Article MissileTubes (Jan 2013)

    UK decision to procure outfitted missile tubesfrom the U.S. (March 2013)

    Technical Readiness Assessment plan signed outby the Chief of Naval Research (Apr 2013)

    Ship requirements set: Torpedo room configuration (Jan 2013) Stern control surface configuration (Apr 2013) Bow configuration (Jul 2013) Missile compartment length (Aug 2013) Sail configuration (Sep 2013)

    Integrated Tube and Hull: Scott ForgeStrategic Weapons System Ashore

    Ground Breaking

    Stern Control Surface Configuration

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    13/22

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    14/22

    MK 48 Heavyweight TorpedoProduction Re-Start

    GUIDANCE AND CONTROL(G&C) SECTION

    WARHEAD SECTION FUEL TANK SECTION AFTERBODY/TAILCONE SECTION

    14PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    15/22

    Low cost, submarine-launched, micro-UAVs,optimized for A2AD environment to provide

    target solution for OTH 3rd party strike.Technologies:

    Re-packaged UAV for 3-inchcountermeasure launch with >1hrendurance

    Timed-release launch withMission Preload

    Submarine-to-UAV communicationsvia OE-538

    Digital and encrypted comms

    Multiple UAVs daisy chained to

    increase comms and covertness JREAP-C (Link 16 over IP) for

    OTH 3rd party strike

    Weaponized version (inert demonstration)

    as a close-in and littoral self-defense option

    FY13 FY 15 AWESUM JCTD

    Teamed with USAF, SOCOM & PACOM

    ADVANCED WEAPONS ENHANCED BYSUBMARINE UAS AGAINST MOBILETARGETS (AWESUM)

    15PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    16/22

    Universal Launch andRecovery Module

    16PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

    Video taken out due to size

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    17/22

    CVN-77 Hybrid Prototype

    Installation complete Remaining Test Events to Increase Confidence:

    Integrated end-to-end at-sea test on BUSH (This Week)

    Electric/Thermal In-water testing (Oct 2013)

    Quick Reaction Assessment by COTF on BUSH (Oct 2013)

    Safety Testing (Jan through Sep 2013)

    Ready Stow Group (2)(Aft Sponsons)

    CAT

    TWS Winch(Fantail)

    Rapid reactionhigh speed hard-kill(launched from RSG)

    TWS Power supplies andProcessor

    (NIXIE Space)

    TWS Receive Array(TWSRA)

    Tactical Controland Displays (2)(Bridge and CDC)

    (deployed from winch)

    77

    17PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

    http://c/Users/edward.r.O'CONNOR/Desktop/PEO%20SUB%20NSL%20Presentation%2024%20Oct%2013/PEO%20SUB%20NSL%20Presentation%20FINAL%2023%20Oct%2013/CM%20Video%20WMV.wmv
  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    18/22

    Ship connections:

    440V power

    115V power

    IRIG B

    PCRP to radar

    NAVSSI

    CONEX Box with processors and operator displayLocated in aft hanger bay

    Portable Winch with TWS Array Stowedin aft hanger bay, installed on fantail for use

    Delivery inFY 2014

    CATs mounted ondeck brackets on sponson

    Roll-On/Roll-Off (RORO)Concept

    ASSUMPTIONS:

    Install on any CVN not fitted with TWS EDM (cable and bracket work required)

    Processors and display in CONEX Box in Hangar Bay

    Same performance as the TWS EDM system Temporary installation

    Hold-down brackets welded and cable runs temporarily installed

    Main equipment secured by chains and brackets (similar to sea test configuration)

    Winch casters allow winch transport from fantail to hanger bay (when not in use)

    No shock qualification

    No Insensitive Munitions (IM) mitigation shielding

    CATs in temporary stows bracketed to deck

    18PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    19/22

    Naval Submarine League Symposium

    Rear Admiral David JohnsonProgram Executive Officer, Submarines

    24 September October

    Continuing Resolution&

    Sequestration

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    20/22

    Impacts of the ContinuingResolution and Sequestration

    20

    All Areas Must Remain Aligned and Properly Resources for the

    Program to SucceedPEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    21/22

    OHIO Replacement Budget Profile

    21Continuing Resolution & Sequestration Major Threats to OHIO Replacement Program Progress

    U.S. / UK CMC - RDT&E

    Propulsion - RDT&E

    SWS - RDT&E

    Gov't Technical - RDT&E

    Rest of ShipRDT&E

    PB14 POR$1,084M

    1 Year CR, $516M

    FY13 Seq

    FY14 Seq (14.1% Cut)

    Combined CR and Seq

    $0

    $150

    $300

    $450

    $600

    $750

    $900

    $1,050

    $1,200

    $1,350

    $1,500

    $1,650

    FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

    PB14 Program of Record

    Program Budget

    FY21 LeadShip Program Execution

    Planned Ramp forFY19 Lead Ship

    Deferred Ramp forFY21 Lead Ship

    PEO SUB NSL Symposium (24 October 2013)

  • 7/27/2019 PEO SUB NSL Symposium FINAL 24 Oct 13.pptx

    22/22

    Major Accomplishments

    Delivered PCU MINNESOTA (SSN 783) 11 months early

    to contract delivery date Completed SOF FOT&E on USS MISSISSIPPI (SSN 782)

    Completed USS CALIFORNIA (SSN 781) PSA

    Laid PCU JOHN WARNER (SSN 785) keel

    Christened PCU NORTH DAKOTA (SSN 784)

    Began construction of PCUs COLORADO (SSN 788),

    INDIANA (SSN 789), and SOUTH DAKOTA (SSN 790)

    Currently negotiating the 10-ship Block IV VIRGINIAClass contract

    Awarded the OHIO Replacement Research &Development Contract 21 Dec 12

    Completed 5 TI-10 installations in the last 22 months

    Installed and commenced in-water testing of EDM-2Anti-Torpedo Torpedo and began installation of theSSTD Hybrid Prototype aboard USS GEORGE H. W.BUSH (CVN 77)

    Completed delivery of all 243 MK54 P2Us

    Completed TI-10/ Integrated Common Processor Build4.5 installations on USNS ABLE and USNS LOYAL andNavigational Oceanographic Processing Facility WI


Recommended