Performance Indicators & Award of Scheme

How will it work?

What are we trying to Achieve?

• Continual Improvement

• Rewarding and encouraging innovation and sustainability

• Collaborative working between Contractors, Engineers and Designers to identify opportunities for improvement

Evaluation Criteria

• Criteria & weightings are the same for awarding the Framework Agreement and individual Schemes

Evaluation Criteria Weighting ThresholdPrice 50% -

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives

10% -

Ability to Improve Innovation 10% -

Technical Capacity 20% -

Health & Safety 10% 4%

Performance Indicators• Performance Indicators link to the evaluation

criteria, rewarding good performance and encouraging continual improvement

Evaluation Criteria Related KPIsPrice ► NA (based on SoR)

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives

► Recycled content, recycling waste, impact on the community

Ability to Improve Innovation ► Sustainability & Innovation sign off

Technical Capacity ► As previous: standard workmanship, site organisation, remedy of defects, tackling unforeseen problems etc

Health & Safety ► Traffic safety & mgmt, compliance with CDM regs

Scoring Matrix for Performance• Scores from 1-10, 5 = meets standard

required

Sustainability & Innovation Sign off• Identify items to vary to improve innovation &

sustainability, requires Contractor & Engineer agreement

Contractor A & B, Q1

• Scores for quality criteria for scheme evaluation in Quarter 1 are based on tender scores (out of 10)

Evaluation Criteria

Weighting Tender score Contractor A

Tender Score Contractor B

Price 50% Based on Schedule of Rates

Sustainability Objectives

10% 7 6

Innovation 10% 6 5

Technical Capacity

20% 8 8

Health & Safety

10% 8 6

Example Scheme: Bill of Quantities

Project: Footway widening, widening of pedestrian crossing, block paving, construction of at grade crossing

Items from the Bill of Quantities

Description Unit Quantity

Pedestrian guardrail laid straight or curved over 20m radius

m 25.0

Rolled asphalt surface course Type a 40 mm thick in carriageway

m2 15.0

Granite Kerbs Type K5, laid straight or curved exceeding 12m radius

m 15.0

Flat top road hump height not exceeding 75mm m2 50.0

Additional concrete mix ST2 to kerbs m3 7.0

Contractor A: Revised Bill of quantities

Description Unit Quantity

Pedestrian guardrail laid straight or curved over 20m radius m 25.0

Rolled asphalt surface course Type A 40 mm thick in carriageway

m2 15.0

Granite Kerbs Type K5, laid straight or curved exceeding 12m radius

m 15.0

Items to be removed or quantities altered

Items to be added or revised quantitiesDescription Unit Quantity Sustainability benefit

Linx 100% recycled guardrail laid straight or curved over 20m radius

m 25.0 Recycled content

Rejuvophalt recycled aggregate asphalt, 40mm thick in carriageway

m2 15.0 Recycled content

Durakerb laid straight or curved exceeding 12m radius

m 15.0 Recycled content

Similar Scheme: Contractor B identified no alterations

Quarter 2 Quality Scores

Evaluation Criteria Wtg Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Mean Score

Price 50% Based on Schedule of Rates

Contractor A

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives 10% 7 7 7

Ability to Improve Innovation 10% 6 8 7

Technical Capacity 20% 8 6 7

Health & Safety 10% 8 5 7

Contractor B

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives 10% 6 5 5.5

Ability to Improve Innovation 10% 5 5 5

Technical Capacity 20% 8 6 7

Health & Safety 10% 6 4 5

• Quarterly scores are based in the average score for all schemes completed in that quarter.

• Average score across the most recent 4 quarters gives the quality scores for scheme evaluation

Example Scheme Q2• Footway widening; widening of pedestrian crossing; block

paving; construction of at grade crossings, approx £50K

Evaluation Criteria Wtg Contractor A

Wtd Score

Contractor B

Wtd Score

Price 50% £50K 48 £48K 50

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives

10% 7 7 5.5 5.5

Ability to Improve Innovation

10% 7 7 5 5

Technical Capacity 20% 7 14 7 14

Health & Safety 10% 7 5 5 5

Total 100% 81 79.5

Quarter 3: Quality Scores

Evaluation Criteria Wtg Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Mean Score

Price 50% Based on Schedule of Rates

Contractor A

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives 10% 7 7 7 7

Ability to Improve Innovation 10% 6 8 7 7

Technical Capacity 20% 8 6 6 6.6

Health & Safety 10% 8 5 5 6

Contractor B

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives 10% 6 5 7 6

Ability to Improve Innovation 10% 5 5 6 5.3

Technical Capacity 20% 8 6 8 7.3

Health & Safety 10% 6 4 6 5.3

• Quarterly scores are based in the average score for all schemes completed in that quarter.

• Average score across the most recent 4 quarters gives the quality scores for scheme evaluation

Example Scheme Q3• Footway widening; widening of pedestrian crossing; block

paving; construction of at grade crossings, approx £50K

Evaluation Criteria Wtg Contractor

AWtd

Score

Contractor

BWtd

Score

Price including Whole Life Costing

50% £50K 48 £48K 50

Ability to meet Sustainability Objectives

10% 7 7 6 6

Ability to Improve Innovation

10% 7 7 5.3 5.3

Technical Capacity 20% 6.6 13.2 7.3 14.6

Health & Safety 10% 6 6 5.3 5.3

Total 100% 81.2 81.2

Have we got it right?