+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1...

Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1...

Date post: 08-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
64
Perfume Engineering Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Pure Ambition Clare Hoang Clare Hoang Cicely Williams Cicely Williams Kyla Patterson Kyla Patterson
Transcript
Page 1: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Perfume EngineeringPerfume Engineering

Pure AmbitionPure AmbitionPure AmbitionPure AmbitionPure AmbitionPure AmbitionPure AmbitionPure Ambition

Clare HoangClare Hoang

Cicely WilliamsCicely Williams

Kyla PattersonKyla Patterson

Page 2: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

OverviewOverview

1.1. ObjectiveObjective

2.2. BackgroundBackground

4.4. MarketingMarketing

5.5. Happiness FunctionHappiness Function

6.6. ResultsResults

7.7. Economic AnalysisEconomic Analysis

Page 3: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

ObjectiveObjective

The objective of our project is to The objective of our project is to

engineer a new scent of perfume engineer a new scent of perfume

over a 10 year life span. In over a 10 year life span. In

addition to this, marketing of the addition to this, marketing of the

product and economic analysis product and economic analysis

must also be taken into account.must also be taken into account.

Page 4: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

BackgroundBackground

Page 5: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Functions of a PerfumeFunctions of a Perfume

FunctionsFunctions

�� Provide a pleasant odorProvide a pleasant odor

�� Cover base smell of Cover base smell of

productproduct

�� Give product identityGive product identity

�� Signify product changeSignify product change

ExamplesExamples

�� Air freshenersAir fresheners

�� Soaps or lotions Soaps or lotions

�� Banana Boat sunscreenBanana Boat sunscreen

�� New and Improved! New and Improved!

Page 6: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Perfume ConstructionPerfume ConstructionMaking a scent Making a scent –– AttributesAttributes

�� Scent Scent –– IngredientsIngredients

�� Color Color –– AestheticsAesthetics

�� Oiliness of fluid Oiliness of fluid –– Concentration of Essential OilsConcentration of Essential Oils

�� Initial strength of fragrance Initial strength of fragrance -- ConcentrationConcentration

�� Endurance Endurance -- TimeTime

*These attributes*These attributes’’ role in the happiness function willrole in the happiness function willbe discussed in later slidesbe discussed in later slides..

Page 7: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Parts of a PerfumeParts of a Perfume

There are three main parts of a perfume:There are three main parts of a perfume:

��BasicsBasics

�� the basics are the materials in the essential oil the basics are the materials in the essential oil

that are present at higher percentagesthat are present at higher percentages

��DiluentDiluent

�� ingredients in the perfume that dilutes the ingredients in the perfume that dilutes the

mixturemixture

��SolventSolvent

Page 8: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

EmulsionEmulsion

�� Due to the solubility of the essential oils in Due to the solubility of the essential oils in

water, perfume is an emulsionwater, perfume is an emulsion�� Range from < 1 Range from < 1 ppmppm to 20,000 to 20,000 ppmppm

�� Not a significant amount Not a significant amount

�� Oil and aqueous phaseOil and aqueous phase�� Continuous phaseContinuous phase

�� Dispersed phaseDispersed phase

�� A stable emulsion A stable emulsion is necessary

http://www.lesestein.de/bildarchiv-vorschau/wissenschaft.htm

Page 9: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Vocabulary Vocabulary

�� Top noteTop note –– component of a fragrance with high component of a fragrance with high evaporation rateevaporation rate

�� Middle noteMiddle note –– component of a fragrance with component of a fragrance with medium evaporation ratemedium evaporation rate

�� Base noteBase note –– component of a fragrance with low component of a fragrance with low evaporation rateevaporation rate

�� Odor thresholdOdor threshold –– minimum concentration in air minimum concentration in air at which an odor is detectable by the human noseat which an odor is detectable by the human nose

�� Odor valueOdor value –– the concentration in air of an odorthe concentration in air of an odor

Page 10: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Scent Pyramid ExampleScent Pyramid Example

Type of scentType of scent Typical Percentage ofTypical Percentage of

(Examples) (Examples) Scent in FragranceScent in Fragrance

Lemon, Lavender Lemon, Lavender 1515--25%25%

Hibiscus, RoseHibiscus, Rose 3030--40%40%

Musk, Vanilla Musk, Vanilla 4545--55%55%

Top Note

Middle Note

Base Note

Mata, Vera G., Paula B. Gomes, and Alfrio E. Rodrigues. "Engineering Perfumes." AIChE

Journal 51 (2005): 2834-2852.

Page 11: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Types of PerfumesTypes of Perfumes

10 to 2010 to 2080 to 9080 to 904 to 84 to 8Eau de ToiletteEau de Toilette

10 to 2010 to 2080 to 9080 to 908 to 158 to 15Eau de ParfumEau de Parfum

5 to 105 to 1090 to 9590 to 9515 to 3015 to 30ParfumParfum

WaterWaterAlcoholAlcoholOilOil

Remainder (vol %)Remainder (vol %)Total (vol %)Total (vol %)TypesTypes

We chose to use Eau de Parfum We chose to use Eau de Parfum to reach the to reach the ““ averageaverage ”” marketmarket

Page 12: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Plan of ActionPlan of Action

�� Determine the components of a perfume that Determine the components of a perfume that maximize the ROI and the Happinessmaximize the ROI and the Happiness

�� To do this:To do this:

�� First calculate the market and the demandFirst calculate the market and the demand

�� Next determine the initial composition of perfumeNext determine the initial composition of perfume

�� Relate attributes of perfume to economics using the Relate attributes of perfume to economics using the scent concentrations as manipulated variablesscent concentrations as manipulated variables

�� Use Solver in Excel to optimize ROI by varying Use Solver in Excel to optimize ROI by varying scent concentrationsscent concentrations

Page 13: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

MarketingMarketing

Page 14: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Target MarketTarget Market

�� FemaleFemale

�� Age 25Age 25--4040

�� We chose this market because We chose this market because

this group is more likely to this group is more likely to

have a stable job/income.have a stable job/income.

Page 15: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Introduction LocationIntroduction Location�� Due to investment opportunities, Oklahoma City Due to investment opportunities, Oklahoma City

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is our choice Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is our choice

introduction locationintroduction location

Page 16: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

AdvertisingAdvertising

The intended course of action is to advertise to the The intended course of action is to advertise to the

target market in the MSA. Therefore we have target market in the MSA. Therefore we have

chosen to advertise in the following areas:chosen to advertise in the following areas:

Advertising

7%

86%

1%1% 5% 0% Newspapers

Television

Direct Mail

Radio

Magazines

Online

Page 17: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Pricing ModelPricing Model

��Budget ModelBudget Model

�� WhereWhere•• pp11 and pand p22 are ours and our competitorare ours and our competitor’’s product prices s product prices ($/bottle)($/bottle)

•• dd11 and dand d22 are our and our competitorare our and our competitor’’s demand (# of s demand (# of bottles sold)bottles sold)

•• Y is total amount of sales for product ($)Y is total amount of sales for product ($)

Ydpdp =+ 22112

1

2211 β

α

βα

d

ddpdp =

Page 18: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Pricing ModelPricing Model

�� Fixed Demand ModelFixed Demand Model

�� For our product, the budget model is most For our product, the budget model is most

appropriate. Although this may be the case, appropriate. Although this may be the case,

due to demand constraints, the fixed demand due to demand constraints, the fixed demand

model will be implemented accordinglymodel will be implemented accordingly..

( ) αβα

βα

−−−

= 1

1

1

1

1

1 dDdDdd =+ 21

Page 19: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Determination of Determination of αααααααα

�� αα determined through several logical determined through several logical

assumptionsassumptions

�� Assume that competition is completely Assume that competition is completely

recognized, horizontal fitrecognized, horizontal fit

�� Assume linear recognition fit, then plateau for Assume linear recognition fit, then plateau for

our recognitionour recognition

�� All of the All of the αα’’ss are averaged over timeare averaged over time

Page 20: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Graph of Graph of αααααααα DeterminationDetermination

Consumer Awareness

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time (years)

Aw

are

Con

sum

ers

(peo

ple)

Competition

Pure Ambition

Alpha

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time (years)

alph

a

Page 21: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Happiness FunctionHappiness Function

Page 22: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Perfume SurveyPerfume Survey

�� A survey was used to determine the qualities of a A survey was used to determine the qualities of a fragrance desired by the target marketfragrance desired by the target market

�� Given to a sample group of target market; Given to a sample group of target market; females between the ages of 25 and 40females between the ages of 25 and 40

�� Asked to rate several perfumes over a period of Asked to rate several perfumes over a period of eight hourseight hours

�� Asked to define characteristics of ideal perfumeAsked to define characteristics of ideal perfume

�� These values were used to model the These values were used to model the ““perfectperfect””fragrancefragrance

Page 23: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

ComponentsComponents

What are consumers looking for in a perfume?What are consumers looking for in a perfume?

Scent (60%) Scent (60%)

Endurance (35%) Endurance (35%)

Color (3%)Color (3%)

Initial strength of Initial strength of

fragrance (1%) fragrance (1%)

Oiliness of fluid (1%)Oiliness of fluid (1%)

H(perfume) = (0.6)yH(perfume) = (0.6)yscent scent + (0.35)y+ (0.35)yenduranceendurance ++

(0.03)y(0.03)ycolorcolor + (0.01)y+ (0.01)yviscosityviscosity + (0.01)y+ (0.01)yinit.strengthinit.strength

Page 24: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Additional VariablesAdditional Variables

�� There were other determinants to consider in a There were other determinants to consider in a

consumerconsumer’’s initial purchase of a perfume that s initial purchase of a perfume that

were not considered directly in the happiness were not considered directly in the happiness

function. These include:function. These include:

�� Skin reaction Skin reaction –– Set as a concentration constraintSet as a concentration constraint

(Each EO cannot exceed 5 vol% of total (Each EO cannot exceed 5 vol% of total

perfume volume) perfume volume)

��Price Price –– Determined with pricing modelDetermined with pricing model

Page 25: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Initial ScentInitial Scent

�� How pleasing or displeasing the scent of the How pleasing or displeasing the scent of the

perfume on immediate application is to the perfume on immediate application is to the

consumerconsumer

�� Where z = weight each scent carries Where z = weight each scent carries

�� Where x = mole fraction for each scentWhere x = mole fraction for each scent

orientalwant

haveoriental

muskwant

havemusk

floralwant

havefloral

naturalwant

havenatural

citruswant

havecitrushrscent x

xz

x

xz

x

xz

x

xz

x

xzy

+

+

+

+

=−0

Page 26: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Scent After Four HoursScent After Four Hours

�� The smell of the perfume after four hoursThe smell of the perfume after four hours

�� How pleasing or displeasing to the consumer the How pleasing or displeasing to the consumer the

scent of the perfume is four hours after application scent of the perfume is four hours after application

�� Top note is no longer detectableTop note is no longer detectable

orientalwant

haveoriental

muskwant

havemusk

floralwant

havefloral

naturalwant

havenaturalhrscent x

xz

x

xz

x

xz

x

xzy

+

+

+

=−4

Page 27: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Scent After Eight HoursScent After Eight Hours

�� The smell of the perfume after eight hoursThe smell of the perfume after eight hours

�� How pleasing or displeasing to the consumer the How pleasing or displeasing to the consumer the scent of the perfume is eight hours after application scent of the perfume is eight hours after application

�� Top note and middle note are no longer detectableTop note and middle note are no longer detectable

orientalwant

haveoriental

muskwant

havemusk

naturalwant

havenaturalhrscent x

xz

x

xz

x

xzy

+

+

=−8

Page 28: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

ColorColor

�� The color of the packagingThe color of the packaging�� How appealing the color of the perfume packaging is to How appealing the color of the perfume packaging is to

the consumerthe consumer

�� For our fragrance, the happiness due to color For our fragrance, the happiness due to color

is assigned the number 1is assigned the number 1�� The color red was chosen based on the results of the The color red was chosen based on the results of the

survey which maximizes happiness for colorsurvey which maximizes happiness for color

)03.0(*Kwy colorcolor =

Page 29: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

OilinessOiliness

�� The oiliness of the perfume was determined using the The oiliness of the perfume was determined using the concentration of the essential oils in the perfumeconcentration of the essential oils in the perfume

�� The range is determined by the concentration constraints The range is determined by the concentration constraints set by the volume percentage of oil allowed in an eau de set by the volume percentage of oil allowed in an eau de parfumparfum

�� Volume Percent Range: 8% Volume Percent Range: 8% –– 15% of total 15% of total

{ } ( )01.010 ×= << highclow

metnotifoilinessoilinessoilwy

Page 30: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Initial StrengthInitial Strength

�� Any unhappiness caused by the initial scent of the Any unhappiness caused by the initial scent of the

fragrance being either too strong or too weak on initial fragrance being either too strong or too weak on initial

contactcontact

�� Where CWhere CAA is the actual initial concentration in air, and is the actual initial concentration in air, and

CCWW is the wanted concentration in air determined by is the wanted concentration in air determined by

survey data and comparison to competitionsurvey data and comparison to competition

)01.0(*1..

−−=

W

WAstrengthinitstrengthinit C

CCwy

Page 31: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

EnduranceEndurance�� How long the smell will still be noticeable to others How long the smell will still be noticeable to others after it is appliedafter it is applied�� The amount of time that the perfume can still be detected The amount of time that the perfume can still be detected by others in a ten centimeter radius from the person by others in a ten centimeter radius from the person wearing the perfumewearing the perfume

Thrs = odor threshold Thrs = odor threshold OV = odor valueOV = odor value

�� With: f = 0; if <= 0With: f = 0; if <= 0

f = 1; if > 0f = 1; if > 0

)17.0(1 ×

−=z

ti

z

tienduranceendurance ThrsOVwy

−z

ti

z

ti ThrsOV

−z

ti

z

ti ThrsOV

Page 32: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Diffusion ModelDiffusion Model

�� The endurance parameter in the function has The endurance parameter in the function has

two variables: time, distancetwo variables: time, distance

�� A diffusion model was used to approximate the A diffusion model was used to approximate the

change in concentration of the fragrance over change in concentration of the fragrance over

time and distancetime and distance

Page 33: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Activity CoefficientsActivity Coefficients

�� Activity coefficients were obtained using the Activity coefficients were obtained using the

UNIFAC method from The Properties of UNIFAC method from The Properties of

Liquids and Gases by Reid, Poling, and Liquids and Gases by Reid, Poling, and

PrausnitzPrausnitz[1][1]

�� This method was used because it determined This method was used because it determined

activity coefficients due to interactions between activity coefficients due to interactions between

structural groups instead of utilizing structural groups instead of utilizing

experimental dataexperimental data

Ri

cii γγγ lnlnln +=

[1] Reid, Prausnitz, Poling. [1] Reid, Prausnitz, Poling. The Properties of Gases and LiquidsThe Properties of Gases and Liquids. 4th Edition. New York City, . 4th Edition. New York City,

NY. McGrawNY. McGraw--Hill, Inc. 1987Hill, Inc. 1987

Page 34: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Activity CoefficientsActivity Coefficients

�� Combinatorial Combinatorial –– due to differences in sizes due to differences in sizes

and shapes of the molecules in the mixtureand shapes of the molecules in the mixture

�� Residual Residual –– due to energy interactions between due to energy interactions between

the different groupsthe different groups

Ri

cii γγγ lnlnln += R

icii γγγ lnlnln +=

Ri

cii γγγ lnlnln +=

Page 35: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Analysis in ExcelAnalysis in ExcelUsing Excel, we iterated the change in concentration Using Excel, we iterated the change in concentration over time up to a distance of 1 ft and a time of 8 hoursover time up to a distance of 1 ft and a time of 8 hours

�� Most data was known Most data was known with the exception of the with the exception of the concentration change concentration change over distanceover distance

�� This was calculated This was calculated using a derivation of using a derivation of FickFick’’s Second Laws Second Law

Page 36: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

FickFick’’s Second Laws Second Law

�� Small amount of liquid on surface with concentration Small amount of liquid on surface with concentration changing over timechanging over time

�� Derivation for numerical analysisDerivation for numerical analysis

�� Required assumptions due to lack of experimental dataRequired assumptions due to lack of experimental data�� Liquid and gas phases are in equilibrium Liquid and gas phases are in equilibrium

�� Unidirectional diffusionUnidirectional diffusion

�� Ideal gas law holdsIdeal gas law holds

�� Each component diffuses separatelyEach component diffuses separately

2

2

z

cD

t

c ii

∂∂=

∂∂

Page 37: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Diffusion ModelDiffusion Model

�� A diffusion model was used to define endurance A diffusion model was used to define endurance in the perfumein the perfume

�� Optimum endurance of the scent was defined by Optimum endurance of the scent was defined by using the concentration of the fastest depleting using the concentration of the fastest depleting base note at time equal to eight hours base note at time equal to eight hours

�� This concentration must be equal or greater than This concentration must be equal or greater than the threshold of the scent to be considered as the threshold of the scent to be considered as ““enduringenduring””

Page 38: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Numerical AnalysisNumerical Analysis

Boundary Conditions:Boundary Conditions:

�� t = 0, Ct = 0, CAA (z, 0)= C(z, 0)= CAoAo for all zfor all z

�� z = 0, Cz = 0, CAA (0, t) = C(0, t) = CAsAs for t > 0for t > 0

�� z = z = ∞∞, C, CAA ((∞∞, t) = C, t) = CAoAo for all t for all t

[ ]2

,,,,, 2)(

z

cccD

t

cc ttzzttzttzzttztz

∆+−

=∆

− ∆−∆−∆−∆−∆+∆−

Derivation of FickDerivation of Fick’’s 2s 2ndnd LawLaw

Page 39: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Diffusion Model (cont.)Diffusion Model (cont.)

��

( )z

z

cc

z

cc

Dt

cc

ttzz

ttz

ttz

ttzz

ttz

tz

∆−−

∆−

=∆−

∆−∆−

∆−∆−∆−∆+

∆−

( )z

z

cc

z

cc

Dt

cc

ttzz

ttz

ttz

ttzz

ttz

tz

∆−

∆−

=∆

∆−∆−

∆−∆−∆−∆+

∆−

From Fick’s 2nd Law

Expanding we get

Simplifying we get

with

[ ]ttzz

ttz

ttzz

ttz

tz ccc

z

tDcc ∆−

∆−∆−∆−

∆+∆− +−

∆∆+= 2

2

[ ]ttzz

ttzz

tz ccc ∆−

∆−∆−∆+ +=

2

1tDz ∆=∆ 2

Page 40: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Analysis in Excel ContAnalysis in Excel Cont’’dd

zc ∆∆ /With these

values, we can

find the

concentration

at any time

and at any

position

tzc |

Page 41: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Concentration ProfilesConcentration ProfilesConcentration profiles were developed by plotting Concentration profiles were developed by plotting

concentration versus time at distance zconcentration versus time at distance z

Concentration vs. z-distanceSandalwood (Linalool)

0

0.0002

0.0004

0.0006

0.0008

0.001

0.0012

0.0014

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

z - distance (m)

Con

c (m

ol/m

3).

t=1 hr t=2 hr t=3 hr t=4 hr t=5 hr t=6 hr t=7 hr t=8 hr

Page 42: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Concentration vs. TimeConcentration vs. Time

Concentration vs. Timez-distance = 0.1 m

-0.0001

0.0001

0.0003

0.0005

0.0007

0.0009

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Time (hr)

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

ol/m

3)...

Sandalwood Musk Vanilla Amber Threshold

-0.000005

0

0.000005

0.00001

0.000015

0.00002

0 2 4 6 8 10

Time (hr)

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

ol/m

3)...

�� The fastest The fastest

depleting depleting

component was component was

determined to be determined to be

Sandalwood, with a Sandalwood, with a

threshold in air of threshold in air of

6.4 x 106.4 x 10--55 g/mg/m33, and , and

an endurance time an endurance time

of 9 hoursof 9 hours

�� Based on these Based on these

values, the values, the

endurance of the endurance of the

perfume was perfume was

determineddetermined

Page 43: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Happiness FunctionHappiness Function

�� To determine the engineered variables with To determine the engineered variables with

respect to the consumer variables from the respect to the consumer variables from the

survey, graphs of happiness versus each survey, graphs of happiness versus each

consumer variable were developedconsumer variable were developed

�� These were then related to intermediate These were then related to intermediate

variables which could be manipulated to variables which could be manipulated to

form the fragranceform the fragrance

Page 44: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Scent GraphsScent Graphs

Happiness vs. Consumer AmountScent - 0 HR

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Consumer Amount (Volume Fraction)

Hap

pine

ss. Citrus

Natural

Floral

Musk

Oriental

Happiness vs. Consumer Amount (Linearized)Scent 0-HR

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Consumer Amount (Volume Fraction)

Hap

pine

ss.

Citrus

Natural

Floral

Musk

Oriental

Page 45: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Scent GraphsScent Graphs

Volume fraction vs. Mole fractionCitrus (0-Hour)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Intermediate Variable (mole fraction)

Con

sum

er a

mou

nt

(vol

ume

fract

ion)

Page 46: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Scent Graph With Intermediate Scent Graph With Intermediate

VariableVariable

Happiness vs. Intermediate VariableScent 0 HR

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Intermediate Variable (mole fraction)

Hap

pine

ss. Citrus

Natural

Floral

Musk

Oriental

Page 47: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Determination of Determination of ββββββββ

ββ = Happiness of Competition / Happiness of Pure Ambition= Happiness of Competition / Happiness of Pure Ambition

0.7560.718Overall Happiness

7.66.90Overall Score

6.50.50Oiliness

8.510.0Color

6.79.9Init. Strength

8.08.0Endurance

23.219.9Scent

CompetitionPure AmbitionCategories

Happiness Comparison

Page 48: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Economic AnalysisEconomic Analysis

Page 49: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Packaging

P-10

Process Flow DiagramProcess Flow Diagram

Mixer

StorageTank

Diaphragm Pump

Diaphragm Pump

Packaging

�� Based on Based on

demand modeldemand model

�� ProductionProduction�� 13300 bottles/year13300 bottles/year

�� 1.7 oz/bottle1.7 oz/bottle

�� 665 liters/year665 liters/year

High-Speed Homogenizing

Emulsifier

Page 50: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Capital InvestmentCapital Investment

Page 51: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Production Costs Production Costs –– Max ROIMax ROI

Page 52: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Perfume Results Perfume Results

Page 53: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Formula of Perfume Formula of Perfume -- Max Max

Happiness ~ 80%Happiness ~ 80%

Top NoteTop Note0.500.50PeonyPeony

Top NoteTop Note2.322.32LemonLemon

Middle NoteMiddle Note0.500.50HoneysuckleHoneysuckle

Middle NoteMiddle Note0.500.50HibiscusHibiscus

Middle NoteMiddle Note0.500.50RoseRose

Base NoteBase Note1.091.09AmberAmber

Base NoteBase Note1.091.09Vanilla Vanilla

Base NoteBase Note3.853.85SandalwoodSandalwood

Base NoteBase Note4.654.65African MuskAfrican Musk

DiluentDiluent8.58.5DI WaterDI Water

SolventSolvent76.576.5EthanolEthanol

FunctionFunctionVolume%Volume%IngredientsIngredients

PERFUME FORMULATIONPERFUME FORMULATION

Page 54: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Maximum Happiness DecisionMaximum Happiness Decision

�� Based on project life of 10 years and Max Based on project life of 10 years and Max

ROI @ 80% HappinessROI @ 80% Happiness

�� Revenue: Revenue: $ 600$ 600

�� Total Capital Investment: Total Capital Investment: $286,000$286,000

�� Total Annual Production Cost: Total Annual Production Cost: $500,000$500,000

�� Total Profit: Total Profit: --$315,000$315,000

�� Return on Investment: Return on Investment: --110.43%110.43%

Page 55: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Formula of Perfume ~ 75% Formula of Perfume ~ 75%

HappinessHappiness

Top NoteTop Note0.260.26PeonyPeony

Top NoteTop Note2.982.98LemonLemon

Middle NoteMiddle Note0.260.26HoneysuckleHoneysuckle

Middle NoteMiddle Note0.260.26HibiscusHibiscus

Middle NoteMiddle Note0.260.26RoseRose

Base NoteBase Note1.731.73AmberAmber

Base NoteBase Note1.731.73Vanilla Vanilla

Base NoteBase Note6.996.99SandalwoodSandalwood

Base NoteBase Note0.540.54African MuskAfrican Musk

DiluentDiluent8.58.5DI WaterDI Water

SolventSolvent76.576.5EthanolEthanol

FunctionFunctionVolume%Volume%IngredientsIngredients

PERFUME FORMULATIONPERFUME FORMULATION

Page 56: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Most Profitable DecisionMost Profitable Decision

�� Based on project life of 10 years and Max Based on project life of 10 years and Max

ROI @ 75% HappinessROI @ 75% Happiness

�� Revenue: Revenue: $ 820,000$ 820,000

�� Total Capital Investment: Total Capital Investment: $255,000$255,000

�� Total Annual Production Cost: Total Annual Production Cost: $565,000$565,000

�� Net Profit: Net Profit: $170,000$170,000

�� Return on Investment: Return on Investment: 56.91%56.91%

Page 57: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Market ScenariosMarket Scenarios

�� Three economic scenarios in questionThree economic scenarios in question

��High economic pricing on raw materialsHigh economic pricing on raw materials

�� Average economic pricing on raw materialsAverage economic pricing on raw materials

�� Low economic pricing on raw materialsLow economic pricing on raw materials

�� A standard deviation of 20% was A standard deviation of 20% was assumedassumed

�� Raw materials contribute a large Raw materials contribute a large percentage of cost for calculating the percentage of cost for calculating the total product costtotal product cost

Page 58: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

ROI vs. HappinessROI vs. Happiness

ROI vs. Happiness at differing economic scenariosROI vs. Happiness at differing economic scenarios

Page 59: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Risk Analysis for Max HappinessRisk Analysis for Max Happiness

Distribution for ROI (%)

Mean = -110.4282

X <=-111.915%

X <=-108.9595%

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

-115 -113 -111 -109 -107

Mean ROI: Mean ROI: --110.43 %110.43 %

Probability of Occurrence: Probability of Occurrence:

~ 40 %~ 40 %

Cumulative ProbabilityCumulative Probability

100% Chance of losing money100% Chance of losing money

Distribution for ROI (%)

Mean = -110.4282

X <=-111.915%

X <=-108.9595%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-115 -113 -111 -109 -107

Page 60: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Risk Analysis for Maximum ROIRisk Analysis for Maximum ROI

Distribution for ROI (%)

Mean = 56.9146

X <=51.445%

X <=62.3395%

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

40 50 60 70

Mean ROI: 59.91 %Mean ROI: 59.91 %

Probability of Occurrence: Probability of Occurrence:

~ 12%~ 12%

Cumulative ProbabilityCumulative Probability

100% Chance of gaining 100% Chance of gaining

moneymoney

Distribution for ROI (%)

Mean = 56.9146

X <=51.445%

X <=62.3395%

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

40 50 60 70

Page 61: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

MiniMax RegretMiniMax Regret

�� A regret analysis was A regret analysis was performed on low, performed on low, medium, and high medium, and high market values for raw market values for raw material costmaterial cost

�� Based on MiniMax Based on MiniMax

analysis F7 is the analysis F7 is the

optimum choiceoptimum choice

Page 62: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Regret AnalysisRegret Analysis

�� A regret analysis was performed on the perfume formulations at A regret analysis was performed on the perfume formulations at

the three economic scenariosthe three economic scenarios

�� Traditional Traditional –– F7 Optimistic F7 Optimistic –– F7 Pessimistic F7 Pessimistic –– F7F7

Regret Analysis

-175

-125

-75

-25

25

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Low Market Average Marke t High Marke t

RO

I

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

Page 63: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Conclusions Conclusions

Pure Ambition is profitable!Pure Ambition is profitable!

Based on the following parameters:Based on the following parameters:

�� 75% Happiness75% Happiness

�� Demand = 13,300 peopleDemand = 13,300 people

�� Price = $60/bottlePrice = $60/bottle

Page 64: Perfume Engineering Pure Ambition · Concentration vs. Time Concentration vs. Time z-distance = 0.1 m-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (hr)

Questions?Questions?


Recommended