+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Persaud Suppl.REVISED EMBO.May30 - Semantic Scholar · PDF fileAvinash Persaud1*, Philipp...

Persaud Suppl.REVISED EMBO.May30 - Semantic Scholar · PDF fileAvinash Persaud1*, Philipp...

Date post: 09-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: lyminh
View: 217 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
19
REVISED, EMBO-2011-77375 Supplementary Information Nedd4-1 Binds and Ubiquitylates Activated FGFR1 to Control its Endocytosis and Function Avinash Persaud 1* , Philipp Alberts 1* , Madeline Hayes 1 , Sebastian Guettler 2 , Ian Clarke 1 , Frank Sicheri 2 , Peter Dirks 1 , Brian Ciruna 1 and Daniela Rotin 1# 1 Programs in Cell Biology and Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 2 Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, and 1,2 Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. # Corresponding author: Dr. Daniela Rotin Program in Cell Biology The Hospital for Sick Children MaRS-TMDT, 11-305, 101 College St. Toronto, Ont. M5G 1L7 Te: 416-813-5098 FAX:416-813-8456 Email:[email protected]
Transcript

REVISED, EMBO-2011-77375

Supplementary Information

Nedd4-1 Binds and Ubiquitylates Activated FGFR1 to Control its Endocytosis

and Function

Avinash Persaud1*

, Philipp Alberts1*

, Madeline Hayes1, Sebastian Guettler

2, Ian Clarke

1, Frank

Sicheri2, Peter Dirks

1, Brian Ciruna

1 and Daniela Rotin

1#

1Programs in Cell Biology and Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick

Children, 2Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, and

1,2Departments

of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

#Corresponding author:

Dr. Daniela Rotin

Program in Cell Biology

The Hospital for Sick Children

MaRS-TMDT, 11-305, 101 College St.

Toronto, Ont. M5G 1L7

Te: 416-813-5098

FAX:416-813-8456

Email:[email protected]

2

Supplementary Figure Legends:

Supplementary Figure S1: Peptide array screen to identify the FGFR1 sequence that binds

hNedd4-1.

A) Sequence of FGFR1 cytosolic region that bound hNedd4-1 (which was spotted on the original

proteome array (Persaud et al, 2009)). Red asterisk highlights the beginning of the kinase

domain, while the VLLVRPSR sequence is underlined with a blue line. (B) Peptide array

sequences that cover the FGFR1 cytosolic region, including 3 positive controls (PY motifs from

known Nedd4 interactors: LAPTM5, CNrasGEF, ENaC). (C) Peptide array screen with purified

hNedd4-1, identifying 3 putative binding regions (spots number 11-12, 17-19, 61-63), which we

named peptide 1, 2 & 3, respectively. Positive controls (PY motifs) are marked.

Supplementary Figure S2: Lack of binding of peptide 2 to rat Nedd4-1 or human Nedd4-2.

A) His-tagged FGFR1-C terminus (Cterm) immobilized on NTA-agarose beads, or NTA beads

alone (negative control), was incubated with purified rat Nedd4-1 (rNedd4-1) and blotted with

anti Nedd4-1 antibodies (upper panel). B) As in panel A, only purified human Nedd4-2 (hNedd4-

2) was used for binding and immunoblotted with anti Nedd4-2 antibodies.

In both panels A and B, binding of immobilized GST-CNrasGEF to Nedd4 proteins was used as

a positive control: Sup = supernatant. Middle and bottom panels are controls for the amounts of

proteins used for the assay, as in Fig 1A. (C) FP assay to measure affinity of interaction of

hNedd4-2 WW3 domain with peptide 2 (the VL***PSR peptide), revealing no binding. Binding

of this WW3 domain to a PY motif from ENaC (Kd=4.1 M) was used as a positive control.

3

Supplementary Figure S3: Deletion of the hNedd4-1 binding site on FGFR1 leads to loss of

FGFR1 ubiquitylation and to its sustained activation and stabilization.

(A) Deletion of 3 core residues (VLx) from the FGFR1 peptide 2 region (FGFR1- 3) leads to a

reduction in hNedd4-1 binding to the mutant receptor and substantial loss of receptor

ubiquitylation: Hek293T cells were transfected (tfxn) with GFP-FGFR1(WT) or FGFR1- 3,

along with V5-hNedd4-1 (WT or catalytically inactive CS mutant). Cells were lysed and lysate

either subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with GFP antibody (FGFR1) and immunoblotted

for hNedd4-1 (middle panel), or boiled in SDS, immunoprecipitated with anti GFP antibody and

the extent of FGFR1 ubiquitylation analyzed with anti ubiquitin (Ub) antibody. Lower panels

depict the amount of FGFR1/ FGFR1- 3 immunoprecipitated (3rd

panel), and the amount of

hNedd4-1 (WT or CS) in the lysates (lowest panel) used for the experiment. Mixed lysate (of

FGFR1 and hNedd4-1 transfected separately into different cells/plates) represent an added

control for the co-IP, to ensure that binding did not take place after cell lysis. (B) Deletion of 6

core residues (VLxxxP) from the FGFR1 peptide 2 region (FGFR1- 6) leads to a ablation of

hNedd4-1 binding to the mutant receptor and complete loss of receptor ubiquitylation. The

experiment was performed exactly as in panel A. (C) Ligand-dependent binding of hNedd4-1 to

FGFR1 and FGFR1 ubiquitylation: Hek293T cells were transfected as in A, treated with FGF2

(+heparin) for the indicated times, and the extent of FGFR1 ubiquitylation (upper panel) or

activation (2nd

panel) analyzed. Lower 3 panels are controls for levels of total FGFR1 in the IP,

hNedd4-1 in the lysate and loading (actin). (D) Stabilization of FGFR1- 6: GFP-tagged FGFR1

WT or the 6 mutant expressed in HeLa cells were serum-starved and stimulated with

FGF2(+heparin) for the indicated times, cells lysed and proteins in the lysates separated on

4

8%SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for GFP (FGFR1) or actin. Note the disappearance of the

upper band (arrow) over time in the WT FGFR1, but its stabilization in the FGFR1- 6 mutant.

This upper band represents the cell-surface pool of FGFR1, based on our previous work.

Supplementary Figure S4: Cbl knockdown does not affect stability of active FGFR1, and

normal binding of FGFR1- 6 to FRS2 and PLC .

(A) Knockdown of both cCbl and CblB with siRNA in HeLa cells has no effect on stability of

activated (Tyr-phosphorylated) FGFR1: Cells were transfected with GFP-tagged FGFR1 and

incubated with siRNAs for cCbl and CblB. FGFR1 was then subjected to IP with anti GFP

antibodies (FGFR1) and blotted with anti pTyr or GFP antibodies. Lower 3 panels are controls

for loading (actin), and for demonstration of knockdown of cCbl and CblB. (B) Activated

FGFR1- 6 can bind its substrates FRS2 and PLC : HeLa cells were transfected with GFP-

tagged FGFR1-WT, 6 or the kinase inactive (KI) mutants. Cells were serum-starved and then

stimulated (or not) with FGF2(+heparin) for 5 min, and co-IP (and Tyr phosphorylation) of their

targets FRS2 and PLC analyzed. Note similar co-IP of these substrates between WT and the

6 mutant, but not with the kinase inactive mutant.

Supplementary Figure S5: Impaired endocytosis of FGFR1- 6.

Time course of ligand-induced endocytosis of (A) GFP-FGFR1-WT or (B) GFP-FGFR1- 6 and

their bound ligand (FGF2-Biotin+Streptavidin Cy3), as detailed in Fig 4B. (C) Intracellular

accumulation of FGF2 in HeLa cells expressing GFP-FGFR1-WT or GFP-FGFR1- 6. Cells

were pulsed with FGF2-Biotin on ice, followed by Streptavidin Cy5 incubation. Cells were then

incubated at 37oC for the indicated timepoints followed by acid stripping to remove remaining

5

surface bound FGF2-Streptavidin complexes. Cy5 fluorescence intensity of GFP positive cells

was analyzed by flow cytometry. The graph shows the ratio of Cy5 fluorescence at indicated

chase points to signal intensity at time 0 min without stripping. Shown is the average of 2

experiments, each performed in duplicates. (at 30 min: WT= 0.91±0.1; FGFR- 6= 0.25±0.03;

n=4, p<0.001). (D) Plasma membrane expression of FGFR1-WT-GFP and FGFR1- 6-GFP

compared to total expression levels. HeLa cells expressing GFP-tagged FGFR1-WT or FGFR1-

6 were incubated with FGF2-Biotin at 4oC, followed by Streptavidin Cy5. Cells were analyzed

for GFP and Cy5 fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry. Shown is mean GFP fluorescence of

GFP-FGFR1-WT and GFP-FGFR1- 6 (black bars) and the corresponding FGF2-Biotin-

Streptavidin Cy5 fluorescence intensity (grey bars) from 3 independent experiments performed

in duplicates. Error bars depict Std.Dev (WT-GFP=90.2±1.8; 6-GFP=111.26±5.4; n=6,

*p<0.01; WT-Cy5: 30.9±2.1; 6-Cy5= 126.2±38.7; n=6, *p<0.01).

Supplementary Figure S6: Impaired endocytosis of FGFR1 following knockdown of

hNedd4-1.

Time course of ligand-induced endocytosis of GFP-FGFR1 (WT) in HeLa cells when co-

expressed with (A) control, non-specific (NS)-shRNA, or (B) hNedd4-1-shRNA, and their bound

ligand (FGF2-Biotin+Streptavidin Cy3), as detailed in Fig 4D. (C) Proof of knockdown of

hNedd4-1 in HeLa cells stably expressing shRNA against hNedd4-1 (but not in cells expressing

NS-shRNA). The amount of lysate loaded on the gel is indicated underneath the blot.

6

Supplementary Figure S7: Transient knockdown of hNedd4-1 in neural embryonic stem

cells, lack of binding of FGFR3 to hNedd4-1, and maternal deposition of zNedd4-1 in

zebrafish embryos.

(A) Knockdown of hNedd4-1 in human embryonic neural stem cells with shRNA is transient and

normal expression of hNedd4-1 is restored by day 7 post knockdown. NS: non-specific shRNA

control. (B) FGFR3 does not bind hNedd4-1. HeLa cells were transfected with V5-hNedd4-1

plus FGFR1-GFP or FGFR3-Flag, serum-starved and treated (or not) with FGF2(+heparin).

Cells were then lysed, hNedd4-1 immunoprecipitated and co-IP of FGFR3 or FGFR1 analyzed,

as indicated. Note that while both FGFR1 and FGFR3 are activated (as evident from their

activation of Akt (pAkt)), only FGFR1, but not FGFR3, can bind hNedd4-1. (C) Maternally

deposited zNedd4a (zNedd4-1) transcript in early stage embryos. Zebrafish zNedd4a transcript

was detected in 1-cell stage, 8-cell stage, and 1000-cell stage embryos (prior to onset of zygotic

transcription), following reverse transcriptase PCR from total RNA samples. The transcript size

is 794 base pairs. DNA standard, 100bp ladder.

7

Supplementary Table:

Table SI: Human proteins that contain VL***PSR motif

Name Known or predicted features/function

DHX33_HUMAN Putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase

DHX33

FGFR1_HUMAN Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1

FRMD1_HUMAN FERM domain-containing protein 1

LRC8A_HUMAN Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 8A

LRIT3_HUMAN Leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like

domain and transmembrane domain-containing

protein 3

MAST2_HUMAN Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-

protein kinase 2

PHLB1_HUMAN Pleckstrin homology-like domain family B

member 1

TM209_HUMAN Transmembrane protein 209

WDR18_HUMAN WD repeat-containing protein 18

ZC12D_HUMAN Probable ribonuclease ZC3H12D

8

Supplementary Materials and Methods

Antibodies, reagents, cell lines and transfections

The following Antibodies were used in this study: Akt (#9272), pSer473-Akt (#9271) from Cell

Signaling Technology, PLC (#ab41433), pTyr783-PLC (#ab76031), anti-FGFR1 (#ab827) and

pY653-FGFR1 (#ab65115), all from Abcam, FRS2 (#MAB4096), pTyr436-FRS2 (#AF5126)

from R&D Systems, ACTIVE MAPK (#V8031) and Erk1/2 (#V1141) from Promega, mouse

mAb anti-GFP (#8371-1, Clontech), anti- -actin antibody (#A2228, Sigma), mouse mAb anti-

IIITubulin (clone TuJ-1), mouse anti-Sox2 (Clone 245610) from R&D, anti-V5 (#R960-25,

Invitrogen), anti-His (#34660, Qiagen), anti-GST (#MMS-112R), Anti-Ubiquitin antibody

(#MMS-258R) from Covance, anti hNedd4-1 (#3607S) and anti hNedd4-2 (#4013S) from Cell

Signaling, and anti rNedd4-1 (#611481) from BD Transduction. Anti Rabbit polyclonal Anti-

GFP antibody was a kind gift from Dr Graham Warren (Max-Perrutz Insitute, Vienna).

Human FGF2 was from Peprotech. EZ-Link Iodoacetyl-LC-Biotin was from Pierce. Secondary

antibodies and streptavidin conjugated to fluorophores or horseradish peroxidase were from

Molecular Probes.

HeLa and Hek293T cells were grown under standard conditions in DMEM supplemented with

10% FCS (Gibco). HeLa cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), Hek293T

cells were transfected using standard Calcium Phosphate transfection. HeLa cells stably

expressing hNedd4-1 specific shRNA (OpenBiosystems: V2LHS_72553), or control non-

specific (NS) shRNA (RHS4346), all in pGIPZ, were generated and maintained in DMEM

supplemented with 1 μg/ml puromycin. Human embryonic neuronal stem cells (clone hf 5205,

(Pollard et al, 2009)) were grown on poly-Ornithin/Laminin (Sigma) coated plastic dishes

(Primaria, BD) in human NS-A Basal medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml FGF2 and 10 ng/ml

9

EGF and 2 μg/ml Heparin (all from Stem Cell Technologies) according to published procedures

(Sun et al, 2008). Transfection of neuronal stem cells was achieved using the Amaxa

nucleofector device and corresponding mouse neuronal stem cells kit (#VPG-1004).

cDNA constructs

Human FGFR1 cDNA (AC#BC015035) was sub-cloned into pcDNA6.2emGFP using the

Gateway system (Invitrogen). The deletion mutants hFGFR1- 3-GFP (439-441), hFGFR1- 6-

GFP (439-444) and hFGFR1-KI-GFP (Y653F/Y654F, kinase inactive (Mohammadi et al, 1996))

were created using a Site Directed Mutagenesis kit (Qiagen) with WT hFGFR1-GFP in

pcDNA6.2emGFP as template. Zebrafish FGFR1was amplified from Zebrafish cDNA library

using primers designed against the 5’ and 3’ ends of zFGFR1 (NM_152962). zFGFR1 cDNA

was cloned into pDONR221 (Invitrogen) and then sub-cloned into the expression vector

pCSDEST2-GFP (Invitrogen) using the Gateway system. zFGFR1- 6 (424-429) was created

using Site Directed Mutagenesis kit. Zebrafish Nedd4a WW3 (a.a.429-467) was amplified from

the pDONR221-zFGFR1 template and zNedd4L WW3 was created by mutating residues T500S

and K501R in hNedd4-2 WW3 domain (a.a.476-514). Both zNedd4a and zNedd4L WW3

domains were subcloned into the bacterial expression vector pETMHtb.

Purification of epitope tagged and fusion proteins for in-vitro experiments

hFGFR1 C terminus residues 399-616 (in pQE30), hNedd4-1 WW1, WW2, WW3, WW4

domains (in pQE30), hNedd4-1 Hect domain (in pGEX6p-1) and hNedd4-2 WW3 domain (in

pQE30) were expressed in E.coli strain BL21 (RIL) as described (Persaud et al, 2009). Proteins

were purified from 100 ml of growth medium using either glutathione–sepharose resin (for GST

10

tagged proteins) or Ni2+

NTA resin (for 6xHis tagged proteins) and eluted using either 80 mM

reduced glutathione (Amersham Biosciences) or 80 mM Imidazole (Sigma), respectively. The C

terminus of CNrasGEF (PY motif containing protein and a known substrate for Nedd4 (Pham &

Rotin, 2001)), hNedd4-1, hNedd4-2 and rNedd4-1 were also purified as described (Persaud et al,

2009).

In-vitro binding experiments

All binding reactions were conducted at 4°C in PBS supplemented with 1 mM DTT for 2h.

Purified 6xHis-hFGFR1 C terminus (residues 399-616) (0.5 g) and GST-CNrasGEF C terminus

(0.5 g) immobilized on Ni2+

NTA and glutathione–sepharose resin, respectively, was incubated

with purified hNedd4-1, hNedd4-2 or rNedd4-1 (0.5 g). Biotinylated peptides 1, 2, 3 and

ENaC PY motif peptide (10 g) immobilized on streptavidin agarose were incubated with 10

g purified hNedd4-1, and to detect binding of peptide 2 to hNedd4-1 domains, biotinylated

peptide 2 (10 g) immobilized on streptavidin agarose was incubated with 10 g of purified

hNedd4-1 6xHis WW1, WW2, WW3, WW4 or GST-Hect domains. For the reciprocal

experiment, the hNedd4-1 domains were precipitated using either glutathione–sepharose or Ni2+

NTA beads and binding to biotinylated peptide 2 was determined. In addition, biotinylated

zebrafish peptide 2 (10 g) immobilized on streptavidin agarose was incubated with 10 g

purified zNedd4a or zNedd4L 6xHis-GST-WW3 domains to detect binding to these domains;

binding of hFGFR1 peptide 2 (10 g) to hNedd4-1 6xHis-GST-WW3 domains was used as a

positive control. All samples were washed (x2) with HNTG (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM

NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol). Binding was detected by immunoblotting with anti-

11

hNedd4-1, anti-hNedd4-2, anti-rNedd4-1, anti-6xHis, or anti-GST antibodies or by using

streptavidin-HRP, as indicated.

Peptide Array Screens

Peptide arrays were printed on derivatized membranes (Amino-peg500-UC540 sheet; Intavis, 32-

100) using the Fmoc peptide synthesis by the MultiPep RS automated pipetting robot (Intavis

Bioanalytical Instruments). Membranes were activated by rinsing in 95% ethanol for 5 min,

washed (x2) with HNTG, blocked with 2% milk (overnight), washed (x3) in HNTG and

incubated with probe (15 g of purified hNedd4-1, 6xHis hNedd4-1 WW3 domain, or 6xHis

hNedd4-1 C2 domain) at 4°C. Binding of probes to the arrays was visualized by immunoblotting

with anti-hNedd4-1 or anti-6xHis antibodies. ENaC PY motif was used as a positive control for

WW3 binding.

Peptides synthesized: The following peptides were synthesized with biotin conjugated to their N-

terminus: 417

LAKSIPLRRQVSADSSASMN436

(hFGFR1-peptide1),

435MNSGVLLVRPSRLSSSGTPM

454 (hFGFR1-peptide2),

560YASKGNLREYLQARRPPGLE

580

(hFGFR1-peptide3), 418

SSMHSGGMLVRPSRLSSS435

(zFGFR1 peptide2) and ENaC PY

motif peptide, AAAAPGTPPPNYDSLRAAAA, which can bind to hNedd4 WW domains. The

PY motif peptide and its mutant that cannot bind to hNedd4 WW domains,

AAAAPGTPAPNADSLRAAAA, were also synthesized without a biotin label. hFGFR1

peptide2, ENaC PY motif peptide, as well as the mutant PY motif peptide, were also tagged

with Alexa488 on the N terminus for use in the Fluorescent Polarization experiments.

12

Supplementary References

Mohammadi M, Schlessinger J, Hubbard SR (1996) Structure of the FGF receptor tyrosine

kinase domain reveals a novel autoinhibitory mechanism. Cell 86: 577-587

Persaud A, Alberts P, Amsen EM, Xiong X, Wasmuth J, Saadon Z, Fladd C, Parkinson J, Rotin

D (2009) Comparison of substrate specificity of the ubiquitin ligases Nedd4 and Nedd4-2 using

proteome arrays. Mol Syst Biol 5: 333

Pham N, Rotin D (2001) Nedd4 regulates ubiquitination and stability of the guanine-nucleotide

exchange factor CNrasGEF. J Biol Chem 276: 46995-47003

Pollard SM, Yoshikawa K, Clarke ID, Danovi D, Stricker S, Russell R, Bayani J, Head R, Lee

M, Bernstein M, Squire JA, Smith A, Dirks P (2009) Glioma stem cell lines expanded in

adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic

screens. Cell Stem Cell 4: 568-580

Sun Y, Pollard S, Conti L, Toselli M, Biella G, Parkin G, Willatt L, Falk A, Cattaneo E, Smith A

(2008) Long-term tripotent differentiation capacity of human neural stem (NS) cells in adherent

culture. Mol Cell Neurosci 38: 245-258

Supplementary Figure S1

A B

C

*

A BHis-FGFR1-Cterm

GST-CNrasGEF(Cterm)

NTA Beads

hNedd4-2

hNedd4-2

GST-CNrasGEF(Cterm)

Blot: GSTHis-FGFR1-Cterm

Blot: Nedd4-2

Blot: Nedd4-2

Blot: His

130-

95-

His-FGFR1-Cterm

GST-CNrasGEF(Cterm)

NTA Beads

rNedd4-1

rNedd4-1

GST-CNrasGEF(Cterm)

Blot: GSTHis-FGFR1-Cterm

Blot: His

Blot: Nedd4-1

Blot: Nedd4-1

130-

95-

Sup

Sup

C

Supplementary Figure S2

ΔfP

(mP)

μProtein ( M)

PY peptide+hNedd4-2-WW3 (Kd=4.1 μM)

VL***PSR peptide + hNedd4-2-WW3

GFP-FGFR1: WT [ [

V5-hNeed4-1(WT)V5-hNedd4-1(CS) M

ixed

lysa

tes

Mix

ed ly

sate

s

Mix

ed ly

sate

s

- - + - - + -- - - + - - +

Ub-FGFR1

FGFR1

hNedd4-1

lysateBlot: V5(hNedd4-1) hNedd4-1

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: Ub

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: V5(hNedd4-1)

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: GFP(FGFR1)

95-130-170-

Δ3

Supplementary Figure S3

FGFR1-

IP: GFPBlot: Ub

IP: GFPBlot: pTyr

Blot: hNedd4-1

IP: GFPBlot: GFP

FGFR1-Ub

pFGFR1

FGFR1

hNedd4-1130-

130-

170-

170-

95-

95-

130-

170-

kDa

V5-hNedd4-1: - - - - - - + + + - - - + + + FGFR1(WT)-GFP: - - - + + + + + + - - - - - -

FGFR1(Δ6)-GFP: - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + FGF2 (min): 0 5 30 0 5 30 0 5 30 0 5 30 0 5 30

His-Ub: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Tfxn (Hek293):

A BTfxn (Hek293):

C

WT Δ6[ [

Mix

ed ly

sate

s

Mix

ed ly

sate

s

- - + - - + -V5-hNedd4-1(WT)- - - + - - +V5-hNedd4-1(CS)

hNedd4-1

FGFR1

hNedd4-1lysateBlot: V5(hNedd4-1)

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: Ub

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: V5(hNedd4-1)

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: GFP(FGFR1)

95-130-170-

130-95-

170-

130-95-

kDa

FGFR1-Tfxn (Hek293T):

Ub-FGFR1

130-95-

170-

130-95-

D

actin

170-

FGFR1(Δ6)-GFPFGFR1(WT)-GFPTfxn(HeLa): -

Blot: GFP(FGFR1)

Blot: actin

FGF2(hrs): 0 1 3 0 1 3____________ ___________

130-

pFGFR1

FGFR1-Δ6

FGF2(min): 0 5 0 5 0 5

pFRS2α

pPLCγ

Supplementary Figure S4

170- FGFR1

IgG

IgG

FGFR1-WT

FGFR1-KI

_____ _____ _____Tfxn: GFP-tagged:

170-

130-

95-

130-

95-

72-

55-

72-55-

IP:GFP(FGFR1)Blot:

pTyr

GFP(FGFR1)

pPLCγ

pFRS2α

cCBL

CblB

actin

pFGFR1

FGFR1

Control RNAi RNAi cCbl/CblB0 5 30 60 120 0 5 30 60 120FGF2(min)______________ ______________

Tfxn: FGFR1-GFP___________________________

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: pTyr

IP: GFP(FGFR1)Blot: GFP(FGFR1)

Blot: actin

Blot: cCbl

Blot: CblB

____

____

____

___

Lysa

tes

43-

170-

170-

95-

130-

A

B

95-

FGF2-Biotin-Cy3A

Supplementary Figure S5

B.

-0.1

0.2

0.5

0.8

1.1

0 10 20 30Time(min)+acid stripping

Δ6-FGFR1-GFP

WT-FGFR1-GFP

Rela

tive

inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

FGFR1-WTTotal Cell Surface

FGFR1-WT FGFR-Δ6FGFR-Δ6

mea

n flu

oesc

ence

inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

C0min

37C, 20min

37C, 40min

WT-FGFR1-GFPGFP

FGFR1-Δ6-GFPB 0min

37C, 20min

37C, 40min

Merge

D

**

FGF2-Biotin-Cy3A

Supplementary Figure S6

0min

37C, 20min

37C, 40min

FGFR1-GFP+NS-shRNAGFP

FGFR1-GFP+hNedd4-1 shRNA

0min

37C, 20min

37C, 40min

Merge

B

Stable tfxn: NS-shRNA hNedd4-1-shRNA

40 20 10 40 20 10

Nedd4-1

actin

___________ __________

43-

95-

130-kDa

lysate (μg)

C

Supplementary Figure S7

IP: V5 (hNedd4-1)

Blot: GFP Flag

Blot: V5 (hNedd4-1)

IgG

IgG

____

____

____

__

hNedd4-1

____

____

____

____

____

____

Lysa

tes

FGFR1FGFR3

actin

FGFR1-GFP +V5-hNedd4-1

Tfxn:

FGF2(min): 0 5 0 5

Blot: actin

Blot: pAkt

Blot: Akt

Blot: GFP Flag

170-

IP: V5 (hNedd4-1)

130-

72-

55-

130-

95-

72-

55-

170-

130-

43-

72-

55-

55-

FGFR3-Flag +V5-hNedd4-1

_______ _______

pAkt

Akt

FGFR1FGFR3

95-

B

A

130-

95-

NS-shRNA

NS-shRNA

hNedd4-1-shRNA

hNedd4-1-shRNA

hNedd4-1-shRNA

Days post Tfxn: 5 5 12 12 19 19NS-shRNA

Blot:hNedd4-1

Actin

hNedd4-1

actin

C

zNedd4-1

- 1 8 1000Cell-stage embryo:

500-

1000-bp


Recommended