[PERSONAL APPEARANCE CASES] - sci.gov.in · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 21-01-2019COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANTHIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AFTER THE NORMAL COURT IS OVER

CHAMBER MATTERS

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[PERSONAL APPEARANCE CASES]

1 MA 343/2017X

ANJU BANSAL GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.IN D No. - 24204/2016,ONLY IA 184438/2018 to be listed before Hon'bleJudge-in-Chambers. Kindly inform date inadvance so that notice of hearing may be issuedtoPETITIONER-IN-PERSONIA No. 184438/2018 - DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATEON RECORD

[DIRECTION MATTERS]

2 SLP(C) No. 10342/2018XI

MOHLEY PRASAD AND ORS. SHANKAR DIVATE

VersusRAM NARESH SINGH AND ORS.IA No. 139315/2018 - AMENDMENT IN CAUSETITLE

[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]

3 SLP(C) No.7366-7367/2010XII-A

GOVT.OF A.P. AND ORS. T. V. RATNAM[P-1]

VersusM/S OBULAPURAM MINIG.CO.P.LTD. AND ANR. BHARTI TYAGI[R-1], SUNIL

KUMAR JAIN[R-1], RAKESHK. SHARMA[R-1],PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR[R-1], P. V.DINESH[R-1], K. SHIVRAJCHOUDHURI[R-1], ANITHASHENOY[R-1], LAWYER SKNIT & CO[R-1], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-2],ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2], [R-2]

I.A. No. 6522 OF 2019 (APPLICATION FORIMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. RITURAJ BISWAS


IA No. 6522/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

4 SLP(C) No.9202-9204/2016IV-B

JOGINDER SINGH NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusDR. VIRINDERJIT SINGH GILL AND ORS. A. P. MOHANTY[CAVEAT],

DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHIOnly I.A. 157803 and I.A. 157811 is to be listed.IA No. 157803/2018 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 157811/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING

5 SLP(C) No. 26949/2016XII-A

PAPANI VASUDEVA NAIDU AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusSMT. ELLAPALLI CHINNAKKA DIED BY L.R. ANDORS.

ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-2]

I.A. No. 6 OF 2017 APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION OF LEGAL REPRESENTATIVESOF DECEASED RESPONDENTS NOS. 3 AND 4AND TO SET ASIDE ABATEMENTI.A. NO. 7 OF2017 APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING DEATH CERTIFICATE OF PAPANICHENGALRAYA NAIDU- RESPONDENT NO. 3IA No. 186086/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGDEATH CERTIFICATE / CERTIFIED COPY OFDEATH CERTIFICATEIA No. 8/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 186081/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

6 Diary No. 26583-2017II-A

GOPAL SACHIN PATIL

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

7 MA 3032/2018XII

M. PALANIKANI ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE ANDNUTRITIOUS MEAL PROGRAMME AND ORS.IN D No. - 16831/2015,IA No. 118444/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIONIA No. 118441/2018 - RESTORATION

8 MA 3158/2018IX

PURNESHWAR RAO PUND PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusSUSHMA PURNESHWAR RAO PUNDIN D No. - 37679/2016,Petitioner In Person matter..Not to be deleted from the Chamber list of21.01.2019.

9 MA 46/2019IV-B

CHARAN SINGH AND ORS. SUHAAS RATNA JOSHI

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.


IN D No. - 13336/2017,FOR ADMISSION and IA No.183821/2018-RESTORATION and IA No.183823/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPLICATION FOR RESTORATIONIA No. 183823/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIONIA No. 183821/2018 - RESTORATION

10 Diary No. 840-2019IV-B

HARI SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS AND ORS. K. S. RANA

VersusGRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE ATTERNA AND ORS.IN D No. - 30134/2016,office report for direction alongwith IA no.3071/19 it to be listed before Hon'ble Judge (InChamber). UNDER ORDER VIII RULE 6(3)(4)IA No. 3071/2019 - APPEAL AGAINSTREGISTRARS ORDER XV RULE 5

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

11 Diary No. 34324-2018X

KRITI BELWAL ASTHA TYAGI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.3675/2019-STAYAPPLICATION and IA No.3673/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

12 CONMT.PET.(C) No.2237/2018 in C.A. No.10002/2018IV

AMRINDER SINGH RANI CHHABRA

VersusAJAY KUMAR SINGLA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 10002/2018,FOR ADMISSION

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES]

13 Diary No. 13916-2018II-A

BRAJ KISHORE PRASAD SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR186211/2018 CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILINGIA No. 186211/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN REFILING

14 Diary No. 36921-2018II-A

RAJESH KUMAR @MANTU TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHARFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7089/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.7094/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.7091/2019-EXEMPTION


FROM SURRENDERING and IA No.7093/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

15 Diary No. 37802-2018II-A

DULARE SINGH AND ORS. P. K. JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.5377/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.5375/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING and IA No.5376/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING

16 Diary No. 43221-2018II-B

DEVENDER@ TANNU BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7490/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.7492/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT andIA No.7489/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING and IA No.7491/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

17 Diary No. 44779-2018II

VIDYA RAM AND ANR. SANJEEV MALHOTRA

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6045/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.6042/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING and IA No.6043/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING

18 Diary No. 46752-2018II-B

K.V. SAJESH A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6278/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.6277/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

19 Diary No. 47405-2018II-B

GANGARAM SAHU ABHISTH KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF ODISHAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7113/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.7114/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.7112/2019-EXEMPTIONFROM SURRENDERING

20 Diary No. 47669-2018II-C

HET RAM CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusTHE C.D. COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY AND ANR. WASI HAIDER[CAVEAT]


IA No.6469/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.6467/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

21 Diary No. 47848-2018II-B

SUNNY @ SAJI SAJITH. P

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6332/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.6333/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

22 Diary No. 48090-2018II-C

MALLIKARJUNA V.M. NARESH KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKAIA No.8270/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.8271/2019-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.8268/2019-EXEMPTIONFROM SURRENDERING

23 Diary No. 48183-2018II-C

PREM SINGH VERMA BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusREETA THAKURFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6864/2019-EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING

23.1 ConnectedDiary No. 48185-2018II-C

PREM SINGH VERMA BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusREETA THAKURFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7284/2019-EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING

24 Diary No. 357-2019II-C

SESHAIAH K. K. MANI

VersusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7165/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.7167/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.7164/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING


KOMAL S. N. BHAT

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6127/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.6126/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

26 Diary No. 1083-2019II-C

SARAVANAN M.P. PARTHIBAN

VersusSTATE REP BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFPOLICE


FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7425/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.7424/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

27 Diary No. 1435-2019II-C

SANJAY KUMAR UTTARA BABBAR

VersusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7029/2019-EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING

28 Diary No. 1549-2019II-C

NARINDER THAPPER ASWATHI M.K.

VersusSANTOSH KUMARI AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7859/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.7862/2019-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

[DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS]

29 SLP(C) No. 4197/2016IV-B

VIDYA DEVI RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. SANJAY KUMAR VISENOnly SLP (C) 5110/2016 is to be listed.

29.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 5110/2016IV-B

VIDYA DEVI YASH PAL DHINGRA

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN,

MANJU JETLEY[R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

30 SLP(C) No. 4149/2016XIV

SHAH NEWAZ KHAN AND ORS. DIKSHA RAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS. K. ENATOLI SEMA[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], VIVEK NARAYANSHARMA[R-4], [R-5]

Only Office Report for Directions in T. P. (Civil)No. 307 of 2016 will be listed before Hon'bleJudge in Chambers.

30.1 ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 307/2016XVI-A

SHAH NEWAZ KHAN . AND ORS. DIKSHA RAI, VIVEKNARAYAN SHARMA, [R-4], K.ENATOLI SEMA[R-1], , [R-2],[R-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF NAGALAND STATE OF NAGALANDAND ORS. COMMISSIONEROR TO BE LISTED BEFORE HON. JUDGE INCHAMBER ON 25.08.2017FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2016FOR ON IA 2/2016IA No. 1/2016 - STAY APPLICATION


31 SLP(Crl) No. 8737/2016II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN RUCHI KOHLI

VersusMELIA @ MANIYA AND ANR.

32 Diary No. 527-2017(SCLSC) II

RADHANATH YADAB NANITASHARMA[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

33 Diary No. 19122-2017II

SONY PRAKASH K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusSMT. MANTRI SRAVANTHI AND ANR.(1)Non Mentioning of page numbers of annexuresin the list of dates/in petition.- (2)Other-QUESTION OF LAW ANDGROUNDS OF SLP SEEMS TO BE RELATED TOANOTHER MATTERAFTER CLARIFICATIONMATTER IS TO BE RECHECKED (3)Non filing ofapplication forexemption from Filing certified copy of theimpugned judgment/order.-

34 Diary No. 25414-2017II-B

KAUSHAL PRAVIN CHANDRA KAKKAD PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

35 Diary No. 27672-2017(SCLSC) II

SHANTI DEVI NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR.(1)Other-MOST OF ANNEXURES IS INVERNACULAR LANGUAGE ENGLISHTRANSLATION IS REQUIRED MATTER IS TO BERECHECKED

36 Diary No. 34335-2017(SCLSC) II-B

SIVADAS NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA(1)Non filing of office report on limitation withcause title on Green/White Sheet.-FILE O/R INGREEN SHEET.(2)Other-DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXURE P-1 ISINCOMPLETE IN INDEX. (3)Non Mentioning ofpage numbers of annexures in thelist of dates/in petition.-IN LIST OF DATES.(4)Non-filing of copy of thejudgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-EXHIBITS(5)Non inclusion of complete listing proformafilled in, signed in thepaper-books.- (6)Other-APPENDIX IS NOT FILED.(7)Non-mentioning OF the number of days ofdelay, withaffidavit and court fee.-FILL DAYS OF DELAY.(8)Non filing of Copy of surrenderproof/CUSTODY CERTIFICATE in respect of all


convicts.-FRESH CUSTODY CERTIFICATE ISREQUIRED. (9)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.-(10)Improper executionof vakalatnama/Memo of Appearance.-V/A IS NOTACCEPTED BY AOR. (11)Contents ofpetition/appeal, applications And accompanyingdocuments Illegible/ not typed in double space Onone side of the paper.-ANNEXURE P-1 IS NOTLEGIBLE AND TYPED ON BOTH SIDES OF PAGE.TO BECHECKED LATER ON.(12)Other-ALL THE PAGESIN PAPER BOOKS ARE NOT OF UNIFORMLENGTH. (13)Other-ALL THE PAPERBOOKS TO BE CHECKED LATER ON. (14)Nonfiling of application for exemption from Filingcertified copy of the impugnedjudgment/order.-SINCE CERTIFIED I/O IS NOTFILED.


BHARATSINH SHANKARSINH SOLANKI AND ANR. NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38 Diary No. 39606-2017II-A

BHUTKI ROUT RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND(1)Other-PLASTIC ENDS OF GREEN TAGS TO BEFILED INSTEAD OF METALLIC TAGSCONTAINING WITH PAPER BOOKS(2)Other-APPENDIX ARE NOT FILED IN THEORIGINAL AND PAPER BOOKS (3)Non-mentioning OF the number of days of delay, withaffidavit and court fee.-NO OF DELAY DAYS TOBE FILLED IN L/REPORT AND DELAYAPPLICATION (4)Pages No..........containunderlines/highlights/Blanks/torn condition.-BLANK AT PAGE NO B (5)Other-ALL THE ANNSARE NOT MARKED IN THEL/DATES.L/DATES WILL BE CHECKED LATER ON(6)Other-NAME OF THE COURT NOT GIVENGIVEN AT PAGE NO 1 (7)Non-filing of copyof the judgment/order/notification/award/Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-ORDER 22.10.005 AND 24.10.2005 MENTIONEDAT PAGENO 1 IS REQUIRED (8)Other-C/TITLE NOT TALLYWITH I/ORDER AND TO BE CHECKED LATER ON(9)Particulars of the impugnedjudgments not uniformly written in all thedocuments.-HIGH COURT PARTICULARSWRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA 3 OF THE SLP(10)Nonmentioning of date of filing/drawn by.- (11)Other-PAGE NOS OF SLP WRONGLY MENTIONED INPARA 4 OF THE SLP(12)Non-mentioning OF the number of days ofdelay, with affidavit and court fee.-NO OF FELAYDAYS TO BE FILLED IN L/REPORT ANDDELAY APPLICATION (13)Other-APPLICATIONFOR EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING NOTCORRECTLY CAPTIONED EVERY PLACE


(14)Other-LTI AND RTI NOT MENTIONED WITHTHUMP IMPRESSION IN THE V/A (15)Noninclusion of complete listing proformafilled in, signed in the paper-books.-CENTRALACT AND SECTION AND COL 7 NOT FILLED INTHE L.P IN 7A COLOUM APPLICATION FOREXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING TO BE MENTIONED IN THE L.P(16)Other-PAGE NO 13 IN THE PAPER BOOKNOT TALLY WITH ORIGINIAL AND TO BECHECKED LATERON (17)Other-NO OF ANNS ARE BLANK IN PARAOF THE SLP (18)Other-ANN P-1 IS NOTCAPTIONED AT PAGE NO 22(19)Other-PAGE NO 47 IS SMALL FONT(20)Other-PAGE NO 19 IS NOT PAGINATED(21)Non filing of FIRformat.-

39 Diary No. 41168-2017II-A

DHIRAJ CHOUHAN FAUZIA SHAKIL

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHARFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.132296/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.132298/2018-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IANo.132295/2018-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING and IA No.132297/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILINGIA No. 178592/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING

40 Diary No. 41625-2017II-A

SHEOJI PRASAD @ SHEOJI PRASAD GUPTA ANDORS.

ANIL KUMAR TANDALE

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.(1)Other-ANNS MARKED IN LIST OF DATE ARENOT FILED MATTER IS TO BE RECHECKED

41 Diary No. 585-2018II-A

ASHOK ASHOK MATHUR

VersusTHE STATE OF M.P. AND ANR.

42 Diary No. 1384-2018II-C

V. SRINIVASAN VIKASH SINGH

VersusA. RAVI KUMAR(1)Other-APPLICATIONS ARE NOT FILED.ANNEXURES ARE FILED DIM ANDVERNACULAR. IA FOR O/T IS REQUIRED.MATTER NEEDS RECHECKING.

43 SLP(C) No. 4389/2018XII

VEERASAMY G.SIVABALAMURUGAN

VersusJAYANTHI @ JAYALAKSHMI

44 Diary No. 6652-2018II-A

ADESH MISHRA PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN

Versus


THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

45 Diary No. 9815-2018XII-A

SUGAN CHANDRA GUPTA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusBOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RASHTRIYA ISPATNIGAM LIMITED AND ANR.(1)Other-THE CONTENTS OF THEPETITION/APPEAL, APPLICATIONS ANDACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR,LEGIBLE AND TYPED IN DOUBLESPACE ON ONE SIDE OF THE PAPER (2)Other-PAGE WISE DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTS ISNOT GIVEN IN AFFIDAVIT(3)Other-IF CERTIFIED COPY OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT HAS NOT BEEN FILEDAND IF CERTIFIED COPY IS NOT AVAILABLE, ANAPPLICATION OREXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPY ISREQUIRED (4)Other-CAUSE TITLE IS NOT SETOUT PROPERLY, TO BE CHECKED LATER ON(5)Other-INDEX IS NOT FILED IN NEW FORMATAND IS IT NOT SET OUT PROPERLY (6)Other-PAGINATION OF DOCUMENTS ISNOT DONE CORRECTLY (7)Other-LIST OF DATESIS NOT FILED (8)Other-LISTING PROFORMA ISNOT FILED(9)Other-OFFICE REPORT ON LIMITATION ISNOT FILED (10)Other-MEMO OF APPEARANCEIS NOT FILED(11)Other-SLP IS NOT FILED IN FORM 28(12)Other-PRAYER OF SLP IS NOT CORRECT(13)Other-ALL THE ANNEXURES TO BE MARKEDIN LIST OF DATES INSTEAD OF SLP (14)Other-CERTIFICATE IS NOT FILED(15)Other-ANNEXURES TO BE CAPTIONED ASP1,P2,P3 ETC (16)Other-ALL THE ANNEXURESAND DOCUMENTS ARE DIIM,BETTER AND CLEAR TYPED COPIES OF THEDOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED (17)Other-APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEARAND ARGUE IS NTO SETOUT PROPERLY.ALSO, MENTION REASONS FORNOT APPOINTING AN ADVOCATE AND IFPETITIONER IS READY TO ACCEPT ANADVOCATE IF ENGAGED BY THIS COURT(18)Other-IN VIEW OF ABOVE DEFECTS,MATTER NEEDS TO BE RE-CHECKED LATER ON

45.1 ConnectedDiary No. 32712-2018XII-A

SUGAN CHANDRA GUPTA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusBOARD OF DIRECTORS RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAMLTD. VISAKHAPATNAM AND ORS.

46 Diary No. 16117-2018XVII

M/S UMANG REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED RAJESH P.

VersusARVINDER PAL SINGH(1)Other-DETAILS OF ANNEX. P-8 BE CHECKED.(2)Other-154, 156 SEEMS INCOMPLETE. (3)Pageno. ...... not


clear / legible-2-7 ARE DIM. (4)Other-DATE OFANNEX. P-13 NOT TALLY.(5)Incomplete/INCORRECTaddresses/STATUS of the parties and theirrepresentatives.- (6)Memo of parties has not beenfiled.-(7)Non-filing of copy of thejudgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-28.10.17,LETTER REQUIRED.


DR. YAMINI BOHRA DEVVRAT

VersusUNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CHAIRMAN(1)Non-filing of copy of thejudgment/order/notification/award/ Annexure/Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-APPENDIXMENTIONEDIN INDEX BUT NOT FILED (2)Other-ADVOCATETO CLARIFY DESCRIPTION GIVEN AFTER HIGHCOURT FINDING IN LIST OF DATE (3)Noninclusion of complete listing proforma filled in,signed in the paper-books.-COLUMN NO. 6,NAME OF JUDGES INCORRECT (SPELLING)(4)Annexures..............referred to in the petitionnot true copies of the documents before the courtbelow/ annexures not inchronological order as per list of dates.-TRUECOPY NOT SIGNED (5)Cause title of thepetition/appeal not corresponding to that ofthe impugned judgment and names of partiestherein.-ALL PARTIES BEFORE HIGH COURTNOT MADE PARITES IN SLP ( O.A NO. 3697 OF2017) SEPARATECAUSE TITLE REQUIRED AS THERE AREDIFFERENT ORDERS WITH DIFFERENTPARTIES(6)Incorrect numbering of paragraphsand pagination of paper booksand description in Index.-INDEX IS NOT PROPERAS PER NEW FORMAT (7)Incorrect mentioning ofdescription of annexures inIndex.-SEPARATE H/C PARTICULARS REQUIREDIN INDEX (8)Other-HIGH COURT PARTICULARSNOT MENTIONED IN PARA 3 OF SLP HIGHCOURT PARTICULARS INCORRECT IN PARA 1OF SLP(9)Other-ANNEX NOT MARKED AT PARA4 OF SLP (10)Non-filing of affidavitproperly executed-BLANK (11)Other-ANNEX P2DIM IMPRESSION AND SOME PORTION INHINDI (TRANSLATION REQUIRED)(12)Other-PRAYER FOR EXEMPTION FROM C/CINCOMPLETE (13)Deficit CourtFees...............More court feerequired..................-100 RS DEFICIT

48 Diary No. 39526-2018II-B

SURINDER PAL SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJABIA No. 174567/2018 - MODIFICATION


49 Diary No. 40059-2018II-B

DINESH CHANDER SANJEEV MALHOTRA

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJABIA No. 172953/2018 - EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

50 Diary No. 44804-2018II-C

I GOPAL S. GOWTHAMAN

VersusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICEFOR ADMISSION and I.RIA No. 177449/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

NEW DELHI19-01-2019 12:18:08

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR




HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDYTHIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AFTER THE NORMAL COURT IS OVER

CHAMBER MATTERS


[DIRECTION MATTERS]


GUNU @ GUNASEKARAN

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE(1)Other-INCOMPLETE MATTER. NO ANNEXUREFILED. MATTER RECHECK LATER ON.

2 Diary No. 35037-2018II

RAMESH SINGH AND ORS. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH



R. K. KANNAN TULIKA MUKHERJEE

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICECENTRAL BUREAU OF INVERSTIGATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R.

4 Diary No. 31024-2018II-C

A. SELVARAJ M.P. PARTHIBAN

VersusSTATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPRINTENDENT OFPOLICEFOR ADMISSION and I.R.IA No. 128354/2018 - EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

5 SLP(Crl) No.11100/2018II-C

SATHYAMOORTHY S. RAJAPPA

VersusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE ANDANTI CORRUPTION RAMANATHAPURAOFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS TO BELISTED



6 SLP(C) No. 29152/2013IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusJYOTI SHRAWAN DHONE AND ORS. RAJAT JOSEPH[R-1]Only SLP (C) No. 29152 of 2013 is to be listedbefore Chamber Judge

6.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18150/2014IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

VersusASSOCIATE DEAN AND ORS. CHANDER SHEKHAR

ASHRI[CAVEAT], ANAGHA S.DESAI

7 SLP(C) No. 33229/2013XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH ITSCONSERVATOR OF FOREST

RACHNA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusRAM JATAN (DEAD) AND ANR.IA No. 82082/2017 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 1/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

8 SLP(C) No. 2123/2014IV-B

THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH ANDANR.

SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT

VersusNARESH KUMAR AND ORS.

9 SLP(C) No. 6497/2014IV-B

RAM DASS AND ORS. AURA & CO.

VersusGRAM PANCHAYAT NANU MAJRA . AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, SUNNY

CHOUDHARY, JITENDRAKUMAR

10 Diary No. 7153-2018II-C

S. KATHIRESAN SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR

VersusADDITTIONAL DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICERIW(1)Improper execution of vakalatnama/Memo ofAppearance.-NOT ENDORSED AS SATISFIED BYTEH AOR (2)Non-mentioning OF thenumber of days of delay, with affidavit and courtfee.-DELAY DAYS NOT MENTIONED. (3)Nonfiling of FIR format.-(4)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-BLANKS IN AFFIDAVIT. (5)Non inclusion ofcomplete listing proforma filledin, signed in the paper-books.-COL. 4(B), 7(B),(C) ETC. NOT FILLED. (6)Other-DATE ISINCOMPLETE IN PAGE 59.

11 Diary No. 7183-2018II-C

JOHNSON @ JESU JHONSON P. V. YOGESWARAN

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE


(1)Other-ANNEXURE NOT FILED, INCOMPLETEMATTER TO BE RECHECKED

12 Diary No. 10590-2018II-C

JOHN PAUL@ J.J. MANNAN R. V. KAMESHWARAN

VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE AND ANR.(1)Other-MATTER NEEDS TO BE RECHECKDSINCE FACT IN THE PETITION ARE NOTCLEAR.PLEASE CLARIFY WHETER MATTER ISRELATED TO DIVORCE ORCONTRACT.FACTS ABOUT PEITITIONER ATPAGE BAND 6 ARE CONTRADICTORY.MATTERTO BE RECHECKED AFTER CLARIFICATION.

13 Diary No. 12053-2018II-A

KASHMIR PASWAN BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHARFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.173703/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.173705/2018-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IANo.173706/2018-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING and IA No.173704/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

14 Diary No. 14191-2018II-A

RAM LAL MANJHI TULIKA MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND(1)Other-INCOMPLETE MATTER, ANNEXURESNOT FILED, MATTER WILL BE RECHECKED

15 Diary No. 14216-2018II-C

SHANMUGAVEL AND ORS. BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusGOMATHIAMMAL AND ORS.(1)Other-SYNPSIS INCOMPLETE NO ANNEX.FILED, INCOMPLETE MATTER BE RECHECKED.

16 Diary No. 14249-2018II-A

CHANO KUER AND ANR.

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHARdeath certificate not filed yet.

17 Diary No. 15020-2018PIL-W

MANISHA AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.(1)Improper execution of vakalatnama/Memo ofAppearance.- (2)Other-VIOLATIVE ARTICLES TOBE MENTIONED IN PARA 1.(3)Other-WHETHER AFOREMENTIONEDRESPONDENTS TO THIS EFFECT OR NOT TO BECLARIFIED. (4)Other-NATURE OFJURISDICTION TO BE MENTIONED. (5)Noninclusion of complete listing proforma filled in,signed in the paper-books.-LISTING


PROFORMA NOT CORRECT, ALL COLUMNS NOTFILLED.

18 Diary No. 15436-2018II-C

SIVAPRAKASAM P. SOMA SUNDARAM

VersusSTATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE(1)Other-ANNEXURES NOT FILED, INCOMPLETEMATTER. TO BE RE-CHECKED.

19 Diary No. 15453-2018II-A

ANIL KUMAR DEVVRAT

VersusLAKHAN RAI (DELETED) AND ORS.

20 Diary No. 16619-2018II-C

C. SUNITHA ANSAR AHMADCHAUDHARY

VersusKAJA MOHAIDEEN AND ORS.(1)Other-ANNEX. NOT FILED, MATTER TO BERECHECKED.

21 Diary No. 17097-2018II-B

PARMINDER SINGH SEHGAL ABHIJAT P. MEDH

VersusU.T. CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

22 Diary No. 20413-2018II-A

CHANDAN TIWARI NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR.MATTER HAS BEEN REFILED, HOWEVER, ITWAS NOT REFILED WITHIN THE TIMEGRANTED.

23 Diary No. 21120-2018II-A

SATISH MADHUKAL CHIKHALIKAR SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA(1)Other-MATTER IS INCOMPLETE (2)Other-ANNEXURE NOT FILED (3)Other-MATTER TO BERECHECKED

24 Diary No. 21622-2018II-A

VIVEK AGARWAL SUMEER SODHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT AND ANR.(1)Non filing of SLP (Civil) in Form No. 28 withCertificate. As per Notification Dated 17.6.1997.-ALL 8 PARAS NOT GIVEN IN SLP(CHECK LATER ON, PARA 6 AND 8). (2)Non filingof brief list of dates/events.-R/PROCEEDINGSNOT FILED AT PROPER PLACE.(3)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-AFFIDAVIT HAS BLANKS. (4)Other-PAGE NO. OF177 TO 179 TO BEGIVEN IN PART II OF INDEX AND TO BEDELETED FROM PAPER BOOKS. (5)Non filing ofapplication for exemption from Filing certifiedcopy of the


impugned judgment/order.- (6)Memo of partieshas not been filed.-MEMO OF PARTIES WITHADDRESS OF PARTIES REQUIRED.(7)Non-mentioning OF the number of days ofdelay, with affidavit and court fee.-DELAY DAYSNOT MENTIONED(8)Annexures..............referred to in the petitionnot true copies of the documents before the courtbelow/ annexures not inchronological order as per list of dates.- (9)Other-ALL IA(S) NOT SHOWN ON COVER PAGE.(10)Non-filing ofcopy of the judgment/order/notification/award/Annexure/ Gos/Appendix/letters dated.........etc.-FIR DATED 17/2/16 AND ORDER DATED 31/1/18REQUIRED. (11)Non inclusion of complete listingproforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-COL. 4 AND 6(12)Other-DESCRIPTION OF APPENDIXINCOMPLETE IN INDEX. (13)Other-I.A. FORPERMISSION TO FILE SLP REQUIRED ASINTERVENTION NOT ALLOWED BY HIGHCOURT. (14)Other-DATE OF FILING NOT GIVEN.(15)Other-FIR FORMAT REQUIRED.

25 Diary No. 21891-2018II-A

TULJADAS SUBODH S. PATIL

VersusPARAMJIT SINGH(1)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-BLANK (2)Incomplete/INCORRECTaddresses/STATUS of the parties and theirrepresentatives.- (3)Annexures..............referredto in the petition not true copies of thedocuments before the court below/annexures not in chronological order as per list ofdates.-CASE NO. BLANK IN ANNEXURE P-3(4)Non inclusion of complete listingproforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-DATE OF I/ORDER NOT CORRECT FIR FORMATIS INCOMPLETE.

26 Diary No. 22153-2018II-A

MUNNA RAI BANKEY BIHARI

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR(1)Other-PAGE NUMBER OF LIST OF DATES NOTCORRECT (2)Other-DELAY DAYS NOTMENTIONED IN APPLICATION AND OFFICEREPORT ON LIMITATION BLANK (3)Other-RULEIN PARA 3 OF SLP IS INCOMPLETE (4)Other-ANNX P1 NOT CAPTIONED ONPAGE NO. 24 (5)Other-EXHIBITS ARE REQUIREDTO BE FILED AS MENTIONED IN THEIMPUGNED ORDER (6)Other-FIRFORMAT IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED (7)Other-SLP (C) WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX AT SL.NO. 10 AS ORIGINAL MATTER(8)Other-APPLICAITON FOR PERMISSION TOFILE SLP IS REQUIRED IN CRL. A(DB NO.1119/2012) (9)Other-PARA 8(A)


NOT PROPER (10)Other-PRAYER OFAPPLICATION FOR EXEMTPION FROMSURRENDERING NOT SET OUT PROPERLY(11)Non inclusion ofcomplete listing proforma filled in, signed in thepaper-books.-COL. 7 AND UNSIGNED

27 Diary No. 22225-2018II-A

CHENDYA HURDYA KALE KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA(1)Other-ANNEXURES NOT FILED. MATTER TOBE RECHECKED

28 Diary No. 22226-2018II-A

SAHEBRAO MUNJAJI INGOLE KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA(1)Other-ANNEX NOT FILED AS PER INDEX -MATTER IS TO BE RECHECKED

29 Diary No. 22932-2018II-A

NAZEEMA MOHD. WASIM SHAIKH HARISH PANDEY

VersusBABAN KESHAV CHURI AND ANR.(1)Other-BLANK AT PAGE 15 AND 16. (2)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-PARA 2SEEMS TO BE BLANK.(3)Improper execution of vakalatnama/Memo ofAppearance.-NAME OF PETITIONER TO BEMENTIONED IN ENGLISH BELOW SIGNATURE.V/A ISUNDATED.(4)Non-filing of certified copy of theimpugned judgment.-NEITHER FILED C/C OFI/JUDGEMENT NOR FILED APPL. FOREXEMPTION.(5)Memo of parties has not been filed.-C/T TO BECHECKED LATER ON.(6)Annexures..............referred to in thepetition not true copies of the documents beforethe court below/ annexures not in chronologicalorder as per list of dates.-ANNEX. ARE NOTATTESTED AS TRUE COPIES. (7)Non inclusion ofcomplete listing proforma filled in, signed in thepaper-books.-COL.7 NOT FILLEDPROPERLY. (8)Other-BETTER COPIES OF PAGENOS.17 TO 21 TOBE FILED. (9)Other-LAST LINEAT PAGE NOS.26 AND 28ARE ILLEGIBLE.

30 Diary No. 25000-2018II-A

S.K. BATLU V. ELANCHEZHIYAN

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR(1)Other-INDEX IS INCOMPLETE, ANNEXURESNOT FILED, MATTER WILL BE RECHECKED


DILIPBHAI NATHALAL MAKWANA PROMILA



32 Diary No. 29595-2018II-A

SATYENDRA KEWAT BINAY KUMAR DAS

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDSurrender proof not filed yet.

33 Diary No. 29838-2018II-B

PREMILABEN ANIL KUMAR TANDALE

VersusRAMESHBHAI CHHOTABHAI RATHOD AND ORS.


BHUPATSINH SHAKRABHAI @ BHALABHAIVAGHELA

A. VENAYAGAM BALAN


35 Diary No. 30595-2018II-A

SANICHAR PANDIT DEVVRAT

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDefects not cured after specified period underORDER III Rule 8 (VII).


BABU @ BABU BAJANIYA KALUBHAI MOTIBHAI ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA


37 Diary No. 31498-2018II-A

ROHIT MISTRY AND ORS. RAVI PANWAR

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR.Proof of surrender not filed yet.


VINUBHAI TEJABHAI KALASAVA


39 Diary No. 31570-2018II-C

AVINASH RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT)

40 Diary No. 31783-2018X

DEEPALI VASHISHTH AND ORS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.OFFICE REPORT FOR DEFAULT

41 Diary No. 32855-2018II-C

R SAMPATH IYENGAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusTHE ACTING CHAIRPERSOBN

42 Diary No. 33560-2018II-B

KUDRAT SK. AND ORS. TATINI BASU

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL


43 Diary No. 34029-2018II-C

T. KAMARAJA PANDIAN S. GOWTHAMAN

VersusSTATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFPOLICEFOR ADMISSION and I.R.

44 Diary No. 34383-2018II-C

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAM

VersusGHULAM AHMAD DAROFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT

45 Diary No. 34468-2018II-B

SUBAL ROY SHEKHAR KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGALIA No.140449/2018-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

46 Diary No. 34817-2018II-C

SHREEMAD JAGADGURU SHANKARACHARYASHREE SHREE RAGHVESHWARA BHARATHI SHRISWAMIJI

EJAZ MAQBOOL

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE[CAVEAT]

47 Diary No. 35311-2018II-B

M/S SREE GOKULAM CHIT AND FINANCE COMPANYPRIVATE LTD.

KRISHNAMOHAN K.

VersusSANTHINI DEVI

48 Diary No. 35360-2018II-B

PRADIP MONDAL SARLA CHANDRA

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

49 Diary No. 36025-2018II-B

SONA KRISHNA CHANDRA SAGAR MANJU JETLEY

VersusKEYUR D. GANDHI AND ORS.

50 Diary No. 36598-2018II-C

SANDEEP SONI NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

NEW DELHI19-01-2019 12:19:15





HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTATHIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AFTER THE NORMAL COURT IS OVER

CHAMBER MATTERS


[DIRECTION MATTERS]

1 Crl.A. No. 389/2009II-C

MOHD.YASIN

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION

2 Crl.A. No. 1012/2013II-B

MAJOR SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1]

3 Crl.A. No. 1184/2014II-B

MALKIAT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1],

DELHI LAWCHAMBERS[R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-8]

PLS. LIST OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION ASAPPELLANT IS NOT REPRESENTED BY ANYCOUNSEL (REF. R/P DATED 05.12.2018.)

4 SLP(Crl) No.10865/2015(SCLSC) II-A

DEEPAK SAXENA MINAKSHI VIJ

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. ARJUN GARG, [R-2], [R-3],

[R-4], NIDHI, [R-8]vide order dated 27.11.2018, the SLP against quarespondent nos. 5 and 7 has been dismissed.

5 SLP(Crl) No. 1619/2016II-C

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

6 SLP(Crl) No. 7019/2016II

KISMATUL AND ANR. NITIN KUMAR THAKUR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. PARMANAND PANDEY[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], ABHISHEKVIKAS[R-4], [R-5], [R-7]


7 Crl.A. No.174-176/2017II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN[P-1]

VersusPAPPU @ CHATURBHUJ ETC. ETC. ABHAY KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3]only slp (Crl) no. 402-407/18 to be listed beforethe Court of Registrar.

7.1 ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.402-407/2018(SCLSC) II

OM PRAKASH MINAKSHI VIJ[P-1]

VersusMAHENDRA AND ORS. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN[R-3]Only SLP (Crl)No. 402-407 of 2018 is listed beforethe Chamber Court for Direction

8 Diary No. 30520-2017XIV

NATHU RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND ORS. SHALU SHARMA

VersusM/S SCINDIA POTTERIES AND SERVICES PVT LTD

9 SLP(C) No. 28585/2017XIV

HDFC BANK LTD. TULIKA MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3]

10 Diary No. 37676-2017II-C

PARAS RAM

VersusRAKESH KUMAROFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION

11 SLP(Crl) No. 3591/2018II

T.A. KHAN AND ORS. VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-1],

[R-2], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-3], [R-4],[R-10], [R-12], [R-19], RAJESHP.[R-7], [R-8], ANJANIAIYAGARI[R-5], [R-9], [R-13],R.CHANDRACHUD[R-17],ASHWANI BHARDWAJ[R-18]

IA No. 169695/2018 - DELETING THE NAME OFPETITIONER/RESPONDENT

12 SLP(Crl) No. 4661/2018II-A

IRFAN VIJAY K. JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SECRETARY

13 SLP(Crl) No. 4734/2018II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI

VersusRAM NIWAS AND ORS. SUMAN KUMAR

DIVAKAR[R-1], [R-2]


14 SLP(Crl) No. 5679/2018II-C

INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROLBUREAU,

B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusAISHA NAMUTEBI

15 SLP(Crl) No. 8870/2018II

MAMTA SAROJ TRIPATHI

VersusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]

16 Crl.A. No. 1162/2014(SCLSC) II-C

PURAN KUMAR GAUTAM NIDHI[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]ONLY IA NO. 3310/2019 (APPLICATION FORWITHDRAWAL OF CRIMINAL APPEAL) IS BEINGLISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM.IA No. 3310/2019 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE /APPLICATION

17 SLP(Crl) D 34821/2016II-A

PAWAN KUMAR @ KAMLESH KUMAR BHARTI TYAGI

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.(2)Non-filing of affidavit properly executed-AFFIDAVIT IS NOT ATTESTED IDENTIFIED ANDDATE OF VERIFICATION NOT GIVEN(3)Non-affixation of Welfare Stamp.-(4)Particulars of the impugned judgments notuniformly written in all thedocuments.-HIGH COURT PARTICULARS ISWRONG IN INDEX (5)Cause title of thepetition/appeal not corresponding to that of theimpugned judgment and names of partiestherein.-STATUS OF RESPONDENT NO 2 NOTGIVEN AGAINST TRIAL COURT (6)Non-mentioning OF thenumber of days of delay, with affidavit and courtfee.- (7)Annexures..............referred to in thepetition not true copies ofthe documents before the court below/ annexuresnot in chronological order as per list of dates.-DESCRIPTION OF P-4 IS INCORECT ANDINCOMPLETE IN INDEX(8)Annexures..............referred to in the petitionnot true copies of the documents before the courtbelow/annexures not in chronological order as per list ofdates.-YEAR OF CASE NO OF P-2 IS WRONG(9)Other-RELIED UPON JT S INI/O IS REQUIRED (10)Non inclusion of completelisting proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-COL 7 IS NOT PROPERLYFILLEDUP IN L/P (11)Other-COL 7(E) TO BEMENTIONED AS PER CIRCULAR AND FIRFORMAT NOT ATTACHED(12)Other-NAME OF PET NOT CORRECTLYGIVEN IN OFFICE REPORT ON LIMITATION(13)Other-APPENDIX MENTIONED BUT


NOT FILED AND DY NO TO BE DELETED ONCOVER PAGE OF PAPER BOOKS

18 Diary No. 23547-2018II-C

D. GUNASEKARAN GEETHA KOVILAN

VersusSTATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE SPE CBI ACBCHENNAI AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R.IA No. 156394/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN REFILING

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

19 Diary No. 38213-2017(SCLSC) III

KALYANBHAI AJMALBHAI DESAI NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.(1)Other-ALL DOCUMENTS TO BE PAGINATE INORIGINALAL AS PER INDEX AND PAGINATIONIN INDEX INCOMPLETE(2)Annexures..............referred to in the petitionnot true copies of the documents before the courtbelow/ annexures not inchronological order as per list of dates.-ANNEXP1UNDATED IN INDEX (3)Other-PLAIN COPY OFI/O UNSIGNED AS T/COPY,APPENDIX NOT FILED, R/P PAGE NOST FIXED INP/B, F/M NOT REQUIRED IN P/B (4)NonMentioning of capacity of executant for signing ofvakalatnama-W/S NOT AFFIXED(5)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/STATUS ofthe parties and their representatives.-R3 CIVILWORD MISSING (6)Non-filing of application forcondonation of delay in time barredPetition/Appeal.-DELAY DAYS AND OR ON GREENPAGE (7)Other-ORDER DT13/1/14,08/07,9/10/2006, 17/10/1995 AND GOVTRESOLUTION 01/5/2007 (8)Non inclusion ofcompletelisting proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-NOT FILED

20 Diary No. 30516-2018XI-A

NAVAZ B AND ANR. SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.6400/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.6399/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

21 Diary No. 31982-2018XI

DR. R.D. SHARMA AND ORS. DHANANJAY GARG

VersusSMT. RAMESHWARI DEVI AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.171753/2018-APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION and IA No.171755/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA


No.171754/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IANo.171756/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

22 Diary No. 34003-2018IX

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusNEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI

MENON[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.185621/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

23 Diary No. 34071-2018XVI-A

BHARTI DEVI NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

VersusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ANDORS.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.3585/2019-EX-PARTESTAY and IA No.3584/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

24 Diary No. 34728-2018XVI

MOHAN PRASAD MEHARIA AND ORS. BIJAY KUMAR SARAF

VersusTWILIGHT PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. AND ORS. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI

MENON[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.854/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

25 Diary No. 36594-2018XI

BABU KHAN AND ANR. ANKUR YADAV

VersusMOHAMMAD AKIL AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.4352/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.4351/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING


26 Diary No. 28353-2018II

HASEEN MONIKA GUSAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHIA No.185384/2018-EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING and IA No.185385/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILINGIA No. 185385/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN REFILINGIA No. 185384/2018 - EXEMPTION FROMSURRENDERING

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

27 SLP(C) No. 15142/2017III

BHADRESH HASMUKHLAL KANIYA AND ORS. AURA & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. MUNAWWAR NASEEM[R-4]


FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA40323/2017


28 Crl.A. No. 953/2007II-A

MOHAN MAHTO (DEAD BY LRS) RAMESHWARMAHTO AND ORS.

ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[P-1],[P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6],[P-7], [P-8]

VersusMD. MASROOF AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-9], [R-11], [R-11], [R-12],[R-13], [R-14], [R-15], RATANKUMAR CHOUDHURI[R-16]

IA No.71927/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING andFOR [IA FOR BRINGING LRS ON RECORD] ON IA35955/2017

29 SLP(Crl) No. 2629/2012II-A

RAMJI PRASAD JAISWAL @ RAMJEE PRASADJAISWAL AND ORS.

SHANTANU SAGAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ARVIND KUMAR

SHARMA[R-1]ONLY SLP (CRL) 6798/12 TO BE LISTED FORFDR

29.1 ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 6798/2012II-A

SHIV NARAIN BANSHAL AMIT PAWAN

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJIonly SLP No. 6798 of 2012 is to be listed beforethe Hon'ble Judge in Chambers

30 SLP(Crl) No. 599/2014II-A

ANKIT GOUTAM @ RANJEET KUMAR AND ANR. CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1]

31 SLP(Crl) No. 3240/2014II-B

STATE OF KERALA C. K. SASI

VersusMUSTHAFAONLY LIST SLP(CRL) NO.3240/2014 BEFORECHAMBER JUDGEIA No. 63998/2018 - FOR WARRANT OF ARRESTIA No. 171836/2018 - ISSUE OF BAILABLEWARRANT OF ARREST

31.1 ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 3241/2014II-B

THE STATE OF KERALA C. K. SASI

VersusTHIRUMALAI KUMAR @ ROTTI KUMAR S. GOWTHAMAN

32 W.P.(Crl.) No. 57/2014X

SUBRATA ROY SAHARA GAUTAM AWASTHI

VersusUOI AND ORS. K J JOHN AND COOFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT


33 SLP(C) No. 7741/2015IV-B

PARKASH SINGH AND ORS. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

VersusJOINT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJABAND ORS.IA No. 81173/2016 - I A FOR SUBSITUTION, C D ,MEMO PARTIES, DETELTION WITH DETAHCERTIFICATE


JANG SINGH AND ANR. AND ORS. YADAV NARENDER SINGH

VersusGRAM PANCHAYAT MAHORANA AND ORS. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

33.2 ConnectedSLP(C) No.7734-7736/2015IV-B

HARMINDER SINGH AND ORS. TUSHAR BAKSHI

VersusCOLLECTOR/ADC (DEVELOPMENT), FATEHGARHSAHIB AND ORS. ETC.

SHREE PAL SINGH

FOR [I A FOR SUBSITUTION, C D ANDDELETION] ON IA 81167/2016IA No. 81167/2016 - I A FOR SUBSITUTION, C DAND DELETION


RASHPINDER SINGH AND ORS. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

VersusGRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE LADHPUR . AND ORS. DEVESH KUMAR

TRIPATHI[R-1]

33.4 ConnectedSLP(C) No.5968-5969/2015IV-B

BALJINDER SINGH AND ANR. TUSHAR BAKSHI

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. SHREE PAL SINGH


SAU KIRTI PRAKASH VERMA . AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusDR.MANOJ RAMBHAU GAWANDE . AND ANR.

35 SLP(Crl) No.8016-8018/2016II-A

SRIKANT SINGH PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusRAHUL SINGH AND ORS ETC ETC ABHINAV MUKERJI,

PRAKASH RANJANNAYAK[R-1], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-7], [R-8],RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL[R-9]

36 Crl.A. No.1584-1585/2017II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY

RAJIV YADAV

Versus


NETRA PAL ETC. AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV[R-1],[R-3], [R-4]

37 Crl.A. No. 1805/2017II

ANEESA KAUSHAL YADAV[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1]

38 SLP(C) No. 21164/2018IV-B

MAIN PAL THROUGH HIS LRS AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER ROHTAK DIVISION AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR

TANDALE[CAVEAT]Only SLP(C) No. 22300 of 2018 is to be listedbefore Hon'ble Judge(In Chamber).


MAIN PAL (DEAD) THROUGH HIS LRS AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER ROHTAK DIVISION ROHTAKAND ORS.

ANIL KUMARTANDALE[CAVEAT]

39 Diary No. 32925-2017II

N.PANDU RANGARAO BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.(1)Incorrect mentioning of description ofannexures in Index.-INDEX INCOMPLETEPAGINATION (2)Other-H/C OURT NAMETO BE CORRECTED EVERYWHERE, SCR ORDERAND RULE TO BE CORRECTED EVERYWHERE,PAGE NO 67 TO BE FREMOVED FROM P/B ANDSHORT C/T TO BE CORRECTED ON COVERPAGE OF PB (3)Other-PARA 4 ANNEX NOSDIFFER (4)Annexures..............referred to in thepetition not true copies ofthe documents before the court below/ annexuresnot in chronological order as per list of dates.-ANNEX P1, P5 UNDATED IN INDEX, ANNEXP3UNDATED IN LEFT MARGIN IN L/DATES ,ANNEX 2,3 NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER(5)Other-PRAYER8(B) UNDATED(6)Annexures..............referred to in the petitionnot true copies of the documents before the courtbelow/ annexures not inchronological order as per list of dates.-ANNEXP3 UNMARKED AT THE TOP, ANNEX P4 COLLYTO BE REMOVED AND TO BE FILEDSEPERATELY(7)Non filing of FIR format.-D.N. BLANK/DIFFER(8)Other-PAGE 26 BLANKS GIVEN , PAGE 59UNPAGINATE(9)Incomplete/INCORRECT addresses/STATUS ofthe parties and their representatives.-TRIALCOURT POSITION NOT GIVEN , RES ADDRESSDIFFER TO BE CHECKED (NAME) (10)Non-filingof application for condonation of delay in timebarred Petition/Appeal.-DELAY DAYS ANDOR ON GREEN PAGE (11)Other-APPENDIX NOTFILED, ORDER DT 11/04/2011, 16/09/2011(12)Non inclusion of complete listing


proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.-COL4,6

40 SLP(Crl) No. 9284/2017II-A

HIRDAY NARAYAN SINGH SHUCHI SINGH

VersusRAVINDRA PRAJAPATI AND ANR. M. SHOEB ALAM[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.117123/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.117125/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IANo.117122/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP

41 Crl.A. No. 485/2018II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GARVESH KABRA[P-1]

VersusSANJU

42 SLP(Crl) No. 4096/2018II-A

SANTOSH PRASAD @ SRI SANTOSH PRASAD KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.68855/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

43 Diary No. 21436-2018II-C

M. MAHADEVAIYA T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR

VersusGOWRI BASKAR(1)Other-ANNEXUREES NOT FILES.INCOMPLETE MATTER. MATTER TO BERECHECKED

44 Diary No. 21557-2018II-C

GREAT LAKES MULTI STATE CO OPERATIVEHOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

G.SIVABALAMURUGAN

VersusS.P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS.(1)Other-THE MATTER IS INCOMPLETE.ANNEXURES ARE NOT FILED. THE MATTER TOBE RECHECKED.

45 Diary No. 30330-2018II-B

RAJES KUMAR PODDAR ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGALaffidavit not filed vide order dated 25.9.2018IA No. 133109/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 133110/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

46 Diary No. 40138-2018II-A

GIRJA RAI RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

47 Diary No. 44349-2018II-C

SUBRAMANI @ SUBRAMANIAN SANJEEB PANIGRAHI

VersusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICEFOR ADMISSION and I.R.


[SERVICE/COMPLIANCE]-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

48 SLP(Crl) No.3567-3568/2017II-A

SHAMIM KHAN PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR

VersusDEBASHISH CHAKRABARTY AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBE[R-1],

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-3],[R-4], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-5]


KAMLAKAR RATNAKAR SHENOY MOHIT D. RAM

VersusSANJIV V. ANAOKAR AND ORS. J S WAD AND CO[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3], P. N. PURI[R-5], [R-6]


KAMLAKAR RATNAKAR SHENOY MOHIT D. RAM

VersusK.N. GAIKWAD AND ORS. J S WAD AND CO[R-1]


KAMLAKAR SHENOY MOHIT D. RAM

VersusS.S. ZENDE AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBE[R-1]

49 SLP(Crl) No. 9034/2017II-A

SK. ILLIYAS AND ANR.

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.112886/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

50 SLP(Crl) No. 9996/2018II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

VersusHARESHWAR@HEMANT JANU SOGALE AND ORS.

NEW DELHI19-01-2019 12:20:16


Date post:	20-Jul-2019
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dothu
View:	214 times
Download:	0 times

[PERSONAL APPEARANCE CASES] - sci.gov.in · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the...

Documents