Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | pamela-hillary-dawson |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Peter Sage Future Energy Solutions
Hubert HowenerPtJ Research Centre Julich
UK APGTF Forum London 25 November 2004
Clean Power Generation Technology for Europe
The Solution
The Problem
FENCO Overall Objectives
• Set up of an ERA-NET for the development of a technology path that gives the opportunity to share knowledge and funding options for a step-by-step improvement of fossil energy technologies.
• This ERA-NET will link the R&D and demonstration needs of EU member states, the EU industry and academia on an extended European level to describe a technology path towards low and near zero emission power plants.
• Establishment of a critical mass Europe wide initiative that will enable the EU fossil fuel technology industry to be competitive in the world market
Elements of a Strategy
Research and Technology
Validation of Technology
CO2 Protocol, Legal, Health, Safety, Perception,..
2010 2020 2030LighthouseProjects
Technology
Increasing complexity in-tune with market development
Issues – Drivers for FENCO
Global energy projections mean that fossil fuels will be required for several decades
Renewable energy will only become significant in the energy mix in time – a portfolio approach needed
Developing countries (e.g. China) have to be engaged if global climate change is really tackled
The acceptability of nuclear power
Global climate change (up to and post 2050) targets will need full range of solutions
Security of energy supply implicationsEconomics!!
A major transitional issue will be clean use of fossil fuels
Carbon Abatement Technologies (CAT) strategy (UK) improved efficiency
fuel switch/co-firing/retrofit
CO2 capture/storage
COORETEC Concept (DE)
“Snap Shot” of US Position
Clean Fossil Fuel Technologies firmly established as key component of carbon reduction strategy
18% reduction in carbon intensity by 2012, backed by RTD and D initiatives
Clean Coal Plant Improvement programme : 2b US$ over next decade
CO2 Capture and Storage budget for 2004 requested at 60m US$ from a `zero` position less than 5 years ago
US regional networks established Futuregen Project launched with 1b US$, 80% from
USDOE : electricity and hydrogen plant with CO2
sequestration
Strong competition from USA on world markets
US Industry set to take the lead on low-to-zero emission technologies
benefit from US DOE and other support to the detriment of Europe in European and
world markets Establishment of the Carbon Sequestration
Leadership Forum (CSLF)
European Response
Vital that Europe responds in an effective way Critical mass initiative to ensure that Europe
can compete on world markets Sector wide initiative bringing together
industry, academia and governments Combination of national Member State and
EC RTDD programmes with industry and research community
Thrust towards carbon management strategy for power generation with fossil fuels
What needed to be done
Mechanism introduced under EC FP6 ERA-NET scheme
possible to take a two stage approach Specific Supported Action (SSA) followed by
a Co-ordination Action (CA) to be initiated by (quasi) government
organisations of Member States link to industry and national aims and
objectives e.g. POWER21, Thematic Networks, etc.
Many different Member States addressing energy policy
Initiative taken by Germany and UK both countries in a similar position of defining future energy
policy good support from Portugal and Greece interest expressed by Austria, Denmark and Poland plus
other countries
2010 2020 2030 .... 2050 Time
Mid
-ter
mL
on
g-t
erm
decentralized
VisionCombined
C+H Economy
Pressurized Concepts= 55%
Good Economics
Gasification Concepts with CO2 Capture
> 50%
Fuel Cell with Micro Gas Turbine
STC = 50%GTCC = 65%
Sh
ort
-ter
m STC = 55%GTCC = 70%
Priority CO2 Capture
Priority Economics
centralized
Power PlantClose to
Zero Emissions
German COORETEC Concept
FENCO SSA Consortium
Ministry of Economics and Labor (BMWA)
Project Management Group Jülich (PTJ)
(Co-ordinator)
Department of Trade and Industry (dti)
Future Energy Solution of AEA T (FES)
Supporting Partners of FENCO SSA
Ministry of Development
Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (ISFTA)
Gabinete de Relações Internationais da Ciência
e do Ensino Superior (GRICES)
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT)
Denmark Austria
FENCO SSA Work Packages
WP1: Identification of Partners
WP2: Analyses of national R&D programs and initiatives
WP3: Summary of joint R&D activity fields(Content of ERA-NET) WP5:
Preparation of ERA-NETWP4: Administrative
Preparation of ERA-NET
Wor
ksho
p 1
Kic
k-of
f
Wor
ksho
p 2
Inte
grat
ing
new
pa
rtne
rs
Wor
ksho
p 3
R&
D P
rogr
amm
es
WP 6: Project ManagementW
orks
hop
4Jo
int
R&
D
activ
ity f
ield
s
European Structure/Time-LineCarbon Management Strategy for FF Power Generation
EC FP6 SSA
UK CAT Strategy
EC FP6 RTD Energy
Member States Clean FF RTD (UK, DE, …….)
EC CA Co-ordination Action on CMS FFPG
EC FP7 RTD Energy
EC FP6ERA-NET
Bid3/6/03
1/03 1/04 1/05
DE CMS (COORETEC)
1/06 1/07
FP6 MidTerm Review
Competitive critical massEU activity : POWER21
FENCO
RFCS
FENCO SSA Progress (1)
1st Workshop 18th / 19th December 2003 at LisbonHosted by GRICES
Integration of first new partnersPresentation of some first Member States
ProgrammesPOWER 21 presentationPreliminary questionnaire on national fossil fuel
R&D programmes
FENCO SSA Progress (2)
Country visits to engage new partners2nd Workshop, London 25/26 March 200412 countries and 4 stakeholder groups participateDG RTD presentation – extremely supportive of FENCO
initiativePowerClean presentation – FENCO is complementaryRequirements for programme database discussedPriorities for fossil fuels ERA-NET were debated with the
importance of strategic issues and development of joint programmes being recognised
FENCO SSA Progress (3)
Further country visits (Denmark, Spain and Greece)3rd Workshop, Berlin 28/29 June 200412 countries participate: this implies their intent to
join the FENCO CAIndividual country interest, experience and
aspirations assessed Agreement on FENCO CA outline and scopeActions for proposal preparation
FENCO SSA Progress (4)
Working groups convene July/August 2004 to progress proposal – meetings at Jülich, London and Lisbon
4th Workshop, Brussels 20/21 September 2004 to finalise technical and financial detail of FENCO CA proposal
Small group finalise proposal in Berlin end September 2004
FENCO CA proposal submitted October 2004EC’s response awaited………
Spain Poland
Netherlands Estonia
Norway Latvia
...Additional Collaborators for FENCO CA
FENCO CA COLLABORATORS
Coordinator – GermanyPartners – Austria, Denmark, Greece, Netherlands,
Norway, Portugal, Spain, UKAssociate Partners – Estonia, LatviaSubcontractor – Poland
If FENCO CA proceeds then will explore others joining later on
FENCO CA WORK PACKAGES
1. Coordination and Management – PtJ, Germany
2. Information Exchange on National R&D Fossil Fuel Programmes – FES, UK
3. Strategic Activities – FCT, Portugal
4. Joint Actions – CERTH, Greece
5. Trans-national R&D Activities – SenterNovem, Netherlands
6. Dissemination and Communication – PtJ and FES
CO2 Protocol and related issues
• Opportunity to create a critical mass activity in Europe
• Needs to be part of an overall strategic framework addressing clean fossil fuels as a key element of the energy portfolio
Improve Efficiency
Zero Emission including Capture
Transport and storage
Fuels Cells
Use andEOR
Technology Platformfor Hydrogen
Co-ordination Action
Co-ordination Action
from FENCO
Possible Technology
Platform for Clean Fossil Fuels
Hydrogen
TOP DOWN APPROACHCarbon Management Strategy for Fossil Fuels
Establish the basis for a serious European wide fossil fuel initiative
Help meet future energy needs and environment targets whilst maintaining security of supply
Enable Europe to compete effectively with the USA and others in world markets; link to and consistent with industry and research aims
Intended Outcomes of FENCO
Please visit web site at www.FENCO-ERA.net