+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Petroleum Geology of the Devonian Three Forks Formation, · subunits 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d. Unit 3 is a...

Petroleum Geology of the Devonian Three Forks Formation, · subunits 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d. Unit 3 is a...

Date post: 19-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Figure 7 Devonian Three Forks Formation: Isopach Contour Interval = 2 m Subunit 4b 4-29-8-29W1 Subunit 4c 2-8-8-29W1 Subunit 4c 4-29-8-29W1 Figure 4: Core photos taken in white (left) and ultraviolet (right) light . Yellow fluorescence is oil, and blue fluorescence is anhydrite. of Sinclair reservoir subunits 4b and 4c Figure 6: Stratigraphic Cross-section AA’ Datum: Top of Bakken Formation Sinclair fault Figure 2: Stratigraphic Column Era Southeastern Saskatchewan Manitoba North Dakota Upper Bakken Member Upper Bakken Member Upper Member Middle Bakken Member Middle Bakken Member Middle Member Mississippian Bakken Formation Lower Bakken Member Bakken Formation Lower Bakken Member Bakken Formation Lower Member Big Valley Formation Unit 6 Unit 5 Unit 4 Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 2 Three Forks Group Torquay Formation Unit 1 Qu’Appelle Group Three Forks Formation Unit 1 Three Forks Formation Upper Birdbear Upper (biohermal facies) Devonian Saskatchewan Group Birdbear Formation Lower Birdbear Saskatchewan Group Birdbear Formation Lower (platform facies) Jefferson Group Birdbear Formation ---?--- Figure 5 Devonian Three Forks Formation: Structure Contour Contour Interval = 10 m Figure 8: Tectonic map showing postulated fault lines. Figure 1: Map of study area with cross-section line AA’. Petroleum Geology of the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Sinclair Field and Surrounding Area, Southwestern Manitoba Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines Mineral Resources Division, Petroleum Branch Winnipeg, Manitoba Michelle P.B. Nicolas Figure 3: Three Forks Formation reference log with correlating core photos of subunits. Three Forks Formation Reference Log Subunit 2b 2-8-8-29W1 Subunit 2b Reservoir unit - Daly Field 2-8-8-29W1 Unit 3 2-8-8-29W1 Subunit 2d 4-29-8-29W1 Subunit 4a 2-8-8-29W1 Subunit 4b Reservoir unit - Sinclair Field 2-8-8-29W1 Subunit 4c Reservoir unit - Sinclair Field 2-8-8-29W1 Introduction The study area consists of the Sinclair Field (Townships 7 to 8 and Ranges 28-29W1) and the surrounding area, including Townships 3 to 10 and Ranges 24 to 29W1 (Figure 1). The Sinclair Field is the newest oil field discovery in Manitoba and has greatly expanded in size and production since its discovery in 2004. The Sinclair Field has cumulatively produced approximately 197,000 m 3 oil (over 1 million barrels), and in 2005, approximately 20% of Manitoba’s total oil production. Proven and probable reserves are estimated at 3.8 million m 3 . The productive interval of the Sinclair Field is dominantly the Devonain Three Forks Formation, Qu’Appelle Group, with minor production from the overlying Middle Member of the Mississippian Bakken Formation (Figure 2). The Three Forks Formation is a cyclical transgressive-regressive sequence of shaley, silty dolarenite, interbedded with shale and brecciated in many places. Deposition of the Three Forks was influenced by several weathering events due to transgressive and regressive cycles, prolonged exposures to weathering, and basin tectonics. Stratigraphy and Deposition The Three Forks Formation is subdivided into four units, similar to those recognized in southeastern Saskatchewan by Christopher (1961). In this study, units 2 and 4 are further subdivided into subunits. Figure 3 shows a reference log for the Three Forks and correlating core photos of each subunit. Unit 1 is the lowermost unit and the most widespread, and is the most oxidized and weathered of the units. Unit 2 is an interbedded siltstone and shale, massive shale and occasionally brecciated, and is productive as a secondary reservoir at the Sinclair Field and Daly Field (Townships 9 to 10, Ranges 27 to 29W1). Unit 2 is subdivided into four subunits; from bottom to top they are named subunits 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d. Unit 3 is a red-brown highly oxidized silty shale. Unit 4, the uppermost unit represented in Manitoba, is an interbedded siltstone and silty shale with thick subunits of highly distorted and brecciated siltstone beds. Unit 4 is subdivided into three subunits; from bottom to top they are named subunits 4a, 4b and 4c. Unit 4 is the primary and most productive reservoir at Sinclair Field; production coming from subunits 4b and 4c (Figure 4). The Devonian Three Forks Formation is a cyclical transgressive- regressive sequence. Deposition of the Three Forks was influenced by several weathering events due to transgressive and regressive cycles with oscillatory floodings of the sea and prolonged exposures to weathering (Christopher, 1967). Tectonics The sub-Paleozoic extension of the Precambrian Superior Boundary Zone (SBZ) runs north-south in this area. The Birdtail- Waskada Axis (BWA; McCabe, 1967) runs roughly through the middle of the southern extent of the SBZ (Figure 8). Isopach and structural evidence suggest the presence of faults running parallel to the SBZ eastern and western margins; these faults were active at the end of the Devonian. These faults are herein referred to as the Sinclair fault and Sinclair fault offset, the latter being an en echelon extention of the former (Figure 8). Movements along these faults caused the preservation of the primary reservoir (Unit 4) of the Three Forks Formation east and west of the SBZ margins, while secondary reservoir unit (Unit 2) was exposed as a plateau on the BWA. The preservation of Unit 4 in some wells east of the SBZ margin opens up the possibility that, under the right trapping conditions, there may be another Sinclair-type play yet to be discovered east of Range 24W1. To support this faulting theory, Dietrich et al. (1998) identified several faults using seismic data along a transect from southeastern Saskatchewan to southwestern Manitoba, one of which coincides precisely with the presence of Unit 4, which is truncated in Range 28W1. This same transect identified a fault running roughly north- south around Range 25W1, which may explain the preservation of Unit 4 near the eastern limit of the SBZ. Three Forks Exploration Exploration of the Three Forks Formation in Manitoba has been combined with the Bakken Formation exploration. The two formations are often considered a continuous, commingled reservoir and are pooled together. The Three Forks is currently productive in the Sinclair Field and in the southwest corner of the Daly Field. As a rather new exploration target, it has not been explored in other areas of the province. Future development exists potentially along the north-south trend of the isopach thick of Unit 4. Unit 2 has development potential in areas where its best production where Subunit 2b is present and where Subunit 2c has been minimally affected by redox haloing. New exploration efforts should be targeted northward and eastward of Sinclair Field within Unit 2, and possibly Unit 1. Log signatures of Unit 1 look promising west of the Unit 2 subcrop edge, but core of this unit is not available to correlate with the log signatures. Possible target zones may occur along the north-south trend parallel to the eastern limit of the SBZ, from Range 24W1 and 25W1 where local occurrences of Unit 4 have been preserved, based on log correlations. It is possible that another Sinclair is yet to be discovered along this eastern trend. Conclusions The uppermost of the Three Forks units, Unit 4, is the primary and most productive reservoir at Sinclair Field. Production is also derived from Unit 2, a secondary reservoir at Sinclair and Daly Fields. Thinning of the Three Forks Formation and truncation of Unit 4 eastward suggests that the eastern expansion of the Sinclair Field may be limited. In contrast, the thick isopach trend running north-south along Range 29W1 south of Township 9, where Unit 4 is still present, suggest a southern expansion of the Sinclair Field may be more successful. Isopach and structural evidence suggests block faulting may have occurred in the western sections of Range 28W1 south of Township 9. This faulting would have resulted in uplift and the subsequent erosional truncation of Unit 3 and Unit 4 along eastern limits of Range 28W1. The fault trend may serve as a geological boundary in determining the eastern boundary of the Sinclair Field. The identification of a fault on the eastern edge of the BWA along Ranges 24 and 25W1, coinciding with wells having preserved sections of Unit 4, may provide a similar reservoir in the west. Future potential for another Sinclair-type oil play may exist east of Range 24W1. Isopach and Structure The regional isopach of the Three Forks generally thickens east to west, with its greatest thickness observed from Township 8 Range 29W1 south to the international United States boundary (Figure 5). The formation thins eastward with a rapid successive truncation of the units of the Three Forks towards the east (Figure 6). The units are truncated at the pre-Mississippian erosional surface. Units 3 and 4 are sharply truncated along a north-south trend between Ranges 28W1 and 29W1. East of this truncation, the isopach gradually thins eastward towards the subcrop edge, east of Range 25W1. Units 3 and 4 are preserved a few wells far to the east in Ranges 24W1 and 25W1. Anomalous thicknesses of the Three Forks Formation are also noted in wells located at Virden Field. The structure of the Three Forks shows a general northwest- southeast trend, with synclinal flextures at Sinclair, Daly and Virden Fields (Figure 7). Pronounced structural highs occur in the Daly Field, mimicking those seen in the Mississippian (Klassen, 1996). A prominent synclinal flexture of the contours is seen in the western half of Township 8, Range 28 W1. References Christopher, J.E., 1961: Transitional Devonian-Mississippian Formations of Southern Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Mineral Resources, Report 66, 103 p. Dietrich, J., M.Thomas, Z.Hajnal, P.Redly, C.Zhu, and J. Majorowicz, 1998: Basement-Sedimentary Cover Linkages in the Williston Basin, Southeast Saskatchewan and Southwest Manitoba; Manitoba Mining and Minerals Convention Program, November 1998, Poster, p. 24. McCabe, H.R., 1967: Tectonic Framework of Paleozoic Formations in Manitoba; Can. Inst. Mining Met., Vol. 70, pp.180- 189.
Transcript
Page 1: Petroleum Geology of the Devonian Three Forks Formation, · subunits 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d. Unit 3 is a red-brown highly oxidized silty shale. Unit 4, the uppermost unit represented in

Fig

ure

7D

evonian

Three

Fork

sF

orm

ation:

Isopach

Conto

ur

Interv

al=

2m

Subunit

4b

4-2

9-8

-29W

1

Subunit

4c

2-8

-8-2

9W

1S

ubunit

4c

4-2

9-8

-29W

1

Fig

ure

4:

Core

photo

stak

enin

white

(left)an

dultrav

iolet

(right)

light

.Y

ellow

fluorescen

ceis

oil,

and

blu

eflu

orescen

ceis

anhydrite.

of

Sin

clairreserv

oir

subunits

4b

and

4c

Fig

ure

6:

Stratig

raphic

Cro

ss-section

AA

Datu

m:

Top

of

Bak

ken

Form

ation

Sin

cla

irfa

ult

Fig

ure

2:

Stratig

raphic

Colu

mn

Era

So

uth

ea

stern

Sa

ska

tch

ew

an

Ma

nito

ba

No

rth

Da

ko

ta

Up

per

Bak

ken

Mem

ber

Up

per

Bak

ken

Mem

ber

Up

per

Mem

ber

Mid

dle

Bak

ken

Mem

ber

Mid

dle

Bak

ken

Mem

ber

Mid

dle

Mem

ber

Mississippian

Bakken Formation

Lo

wer

Bak

ken

Mem

ber

Bakken Formation

Lo

wer

Bak

ken

Mem

ber

Bakken Formation

Lo

wer

Mem

ber

Big

Valley

Form

ation

Un

it6

Un

it5

Un

it4

Un

it4

Un

it3

Un

it3

Un

it2

Un

it2

Three Forks Group

Torquay Formation

Un

it1

Qu’Appelle Group

Three Forks

Formation

Un

it1

Th

reeF

ork

sF

orm

ation

Up

per

Bird

bear

Up

per

(bio

herm

alfacies)

Devonian

Saskatchewan

Group

Birdbear Formation

Lo

wer

Bird

bear

Saskatchewan

Group

Birdbear Formation

Lo

wer

(platfo

rmfacies)

Jefferson

Group

Bird

bear

Form

ation

---?---

Fig

ure

5D

evonian

Three

Fork

sF

orm

ation:

Stru

cture

Conto

ur

Conto

ur

Interv

al=

10

m

Fig

ure

8:

Tecto

nic

map

show

ing

postu

latedfau

ltlin

es.F

igure

1:

Map

of

study

areaw

ithcro

ss-section

line

AA

’.

Petro

leum

Geo

log

yo

fth

eD

evo

nian

Th

reeF

ork

sF

orm

ation

,S

inclair

Field

and

Su

rrou

nd

ing

Area,

So

uth

western

Man

itob

a

Man

itoba

Scien

ce,T

echnolo

gy,

Energ

yan

dM

ines

Min

eralR

esources

Div

ision,P

etroleu

mB

ranch

Win

nip

eg,M

anito

ba

Mich

elleP

.B.

Nico

las

Fig

ure

3:

Three

Fork

sF

orm

ation

reference

log

with

correlatin

gco

rephoto

sof

subunits.

Three

Fork

sF

orm

ation

Referen

ceL

og

Subunit

2b

2-8

-8-2

9W

1

Subunit

2b

Reserv

oir

unit

-D

alyF

ield2-8

-8-2

9W

1

Unit

32-8

-8-2

9W

1

Subunit

2d

4-2

9-8

-29W

1

Subunit

4a

2-8

-8-2

9W

1

Subunit

4b

Reserv

oir

unit

-S

inclair

Field

2-8

-8-2

9W

1

Subunit

4c

Reserv

oir

unit

-S

inclair

Field

2-8

-8-2

9W

1

Intro

du

ction

Th

estu

dy

areaco

nsists

of

the

Sin

clairF

ield(T

ow

nsh

ips

7to

8an

d

Ran

ges

28-2

9W

1)

and

the

surro

un

din

garea,

inclu

din

gT

ow

nsh

ips

3to

10

and

Ran

ges

24

to2

9W

1(F

igure

1).

Th

eS

inclair

Field

isth

en

ewest

oil

fieldd

iscov

eryin

Man

itob

aan

d

has

greatly

exp

and

edin

sizean

dpro

du

ction

since

itsd

iscov

eryin

2004

.T

he

Sin

clairF

ieldh

ascu

mu

latively

pro

du

ced

app

rox

imately

19

7,0

00

m3

oil

(ov

er1

millio

nb

arrels),an

din

2005

,

appro

xim

ately2

0%

of

Man

itob

a’sto

talo

ilp

rod

uctio

n.

Pro

ven

and

pro

bab

lereserv

esare

estimated

at3

.8m

illion

m3.

Th

epro

du

ctive

interv

alo

fth

eS

inclair

Field

isd

om

inan

tlyth

e

Dev

on

ainT

hree

Fo

rks

Form

ation

,Q

u’A

pp

elleG

roup

,w

ithm

ino

r

pro

du

ction

from

the

ov

erlyin

gM

idd

leM

emb

ero

fth

e

Mississip

pian

Bak

ken

Fo

rmatio

n(F

igure

2).

Th

eT

hree

Fo

rks

Fo

rmatio

nis

acy

clicaltran

sgressiv

e-regressiv

eseq

uen

ceof

shaley

,silty

do

larenite,

interb

edd

edw

ithsh

alean

dbrecciated

in

man

yp

laces.D

epo

sition

of

the

Three

Fork

sw

asin

fluen

cedb

y

several

weath

ering

even

tsd

ue

totran

sgressiv

ean

dreg

ressive

cycles,

pro

longed

expo

sures

tow

eatherin

g,

and

basin

tectonics.

Stra

tigra

ph

ya

nd

Dep

ositio

n

Th

eT

hree

Fork

sF

orm

ation

issu

bd

ivid

edin

tofo

ur

un

its,sim

ilarto

tho

sereco

gn

izedin

sou

theastern

Sask

atchew

anb

yC

hristo

ph

er

(19

61).

Inth

isstu

dy,

un

its2

and

4are

furth

ersu

bd

ivid

edin

to

subun

its.F

igure

3sh

ow

sa

reference

log

for

the

Three

Fo

rks

and

correlatin

gco

reph

oto

so

feach

sub

un

it.

Un

it1

isth

elo

werm

ost

un

itan

dth

em

ost

wid

espread

,an

dis

the

mo

sto

xid

izedan

dw

eathered

of

the

un

its.U

nit

2is

anin

terbed

ded

siltston

ean

dsh

ale,m

assive

shale

and

occasio

nally

brecciated

,an

d

isp

rodu

ctive

asa

secon

dary

reservo

irat

the

Sin

clairF

ieldan

d

Daly

Field

(To

wn

ship

s9

to1

0,

Ran

ges

27

to29W

1).

Un

it2

is

subd

ivid

edin

tofo

ur

subun

its;fro

mb

otto

mto

top

they

aren

amed

subun

its2

a,2b

,2

can

d2

d.

Un

it3

isa

red-b

row

nh

igh

lyo

xid

ized

siltysh

ale.U

nit

4,

the

up

perm

ost

un

itrep

resented

inM

anito

ba,

is

anin

terbed

ded

siltston

ean

dsilty

shale

with

thick

sub

un

itso

f

hig

hly

disto

rtedan

db

recciatedsiltsto

ne

bed

s.U

nit

4is

sub

div

ided

into

three

subun

its;fro

mb

otto

mto

top

they

aren

amed

subu

nits

4a,

4b

and

4c.

Unit

4is

the

prim

aryan

dm

ost

pro

du

ctive

reservo

irat

Sin

clairF

ield;

pro

du

ction

com

ing

from

sub

un

its4b

and

4c

(Fig

ure

4).

Th

eD

evon

ianT

hree

Fo

rks

Fo

rmatio

nis

acy

clicaltran

sgressiv

e-

regressiv

eseq

uen

ce.D

epo

sition

of

the

Th

reeF

ork

sw

as

influ

enced

by

several

weath

ering

even

tsd

ue

totran

sgressiv

ean

d

regressiv

ecy

clesw

itho

scillatory

flood

ing

sof

the

seaan

d

pro

lon

ged

exp

osu

resto

weath

ering

(Ch

ristop

her,

19

67

).

Tecto

nics

Th

esu

b-P

aleozo

icex

tensio

no

fth

eP

recamb

rianS

up

erior

Bo

un

dary

Zone

(SB

Z)

run

sn

orth

-sou

thin

this

area.T

he

Bird

tail-

Wask

ada

Ax

is(B

WA

;M

cCab

e,1

967

)ru

ns

rough

lyth

rough

the

mid

dle

of

the

sou

thern

exten

to

fth

eS

BZ

(Fig

ure

8).

Isopach

and

structu

ralev

iden

cesu

gg

estth

ep

resence

of

faults

runn

ing

parallel

toth

eS

BZ

easternan

dw

esternm

argin

s;th

esefau

ltsw

ereactiv

eat

the

end

of

the

Dev

on

ian.

These

faults

areherein

referredto

asth

e

Sin

clairfau

ltan

dS

inclair

fault

offset,

the

latterb

eing

anen

echelo

nex

tentio

nof

the

form

er(F

igure

8).

Mo

vem

ents

along

these

faults

caused

the

preserv

ation

of

the

prim

aryreserv

oir

(Un

it4

)of

the

Three

Fork

sF

orm

ation

eastan

dw

esto

fth

eS

BZ

marg

ins,

wh

ileseco

nd

aryreserv

oir

un

it(U

nit

2)

was

exp

osed

asa

plateau

on

the

BW

A.

Th

ep

reservatio

no

fU

nit

4in

som

ew

ellseast

of

the

SB

Zm

argin

op

ens

up

the

po

ssibility

that,

un

der

the

righ

ttrap

pin

g

cond

itions,

there

may

be

ano

ther

Sin

clair-typ

ep

layyet

tob

e

disco

vered

easto

fR

ang

e24W

1.

To

supp

ort

this

faultin

gth

eory

,D

ietrichet

al.

(199

8)

iden

tified

several

faults

usin

gseism

icd

ataalo

ng

atran

sectfro

mso

uth

eastern

Sask

atchew

anto

sou

thw

esternM

anito

ba,

on

eof

wh

ichco

incid

es

precisely

with

the

presen

ceof

Un

it4

,w

hich

istru

ncated

inR

ang

e

28W

1.

Th

issam

etran

sectid

entified

afau

ltru

nn

ing

rou

gh

lyn

orth

-

sou

tharo

und

Ran

ge

25W

1,

wh

ichm

ayex

plain

the

preserv

ation

of

Un

it4

near

the

easternlim

ito

fth

eS

BZ

.

Th

reeF

ork

sE

xp

lora

tion

Exp

loratio

no

fth

eT

hree

Fork

sF

orm

ation

inM

anito

ba

has

been

com

bin

edw

ithth

eB

akk

enF

orm

ation

exp

loratio

n.

Th

etw

o

form

ation

sare

often

con

sidered

aco

ntin

uou

s,co

mm

ing

led

reservo

iran

dare

po

oled

togeth

er.T

he

Th

reeF

ork

sis

curren

tly

pro

du

ctive

inth

eS

inclair

Field

and

inth

eso

uth

west

corn

erof

the

Daly

Field

.A

sa

rather

new

exp

loratio

ntarg

et,it

has

no

tb

een

exp

lored

ino

ther

areaso

fth

ep

rov

ince.

Fu

ture

dev

elopm

ent

exists

poten

tiallyalo

ng

the

no

rth-so

uth

trend

of

the

isop

achth

ickof

Un

it4

.U

nit

2h

asd

evelo

pm

ent

po

tential

in

areasw

here

itsb

estp

rod

uctio

nw

here

Subu

nit

2b

ispresen

tan

d

wh

ereS

ub

un

it2

ch

asb

eenm

inim

allyaffected

by

redox

halo

ing

.

New

exp

loratio

neffo

rtssh

ould

be

targeted

north

ward

and

eastward

of

Sin

clairF

ieldw

ithin

Un

it2

,an

dpo

ssibly

Un

it1

.L

og

sign

atures

of

Un

it1

loo

kpro

misin

gw

esto

fth

eU

nit

2su

bcro

p

edg

e,bu

tco

reo

fth

isun

itis

no

tav

ailable

toco

rrelatew

ithth

elo

g

sign

atures.

Possib

letarg

etzo

nes

may

occu

ralo

ng

the

north

-sou

th

trend

parallel

toth

eeastern

limit

of

the

SB

Z,

from

Ran

ge

24W

1

and

25

W1

wh

erelo

calo

ccurren

ceso

fU

nit

4h

ave

been

preserv

ed,

based

on

log

correlatio

ns.

Itis

po

ssible

that

ano

ther

Sin

clairis

yet

tob

ed

iscov

eredalo

ng

this

easterntren

d.

Co

nclu

sion

s

Th

eup

perm

ost

of

the

Three

Fo

rks

un

its,U

nit

4,

isth

ep

rimary

and

mo

stp

rodu

ctive

reservo

irat

Sin

clairF

ield.

Pro

du

ction

isalso

deriv

edfro

mU

nit

2,

aseco

nd

aryreserv

oir

atS

inclair

and

Daly

Field

s.T

hin

nin

gof

the

Th

reeF

ork

sF

orm

ation

and

trun

cation

of

Un

it4

eastward

sug

gests

that

the

easternex

pan

sion

of

the

Sin

clair

Field

may

be

limited

.In

con

trast,th

eth

ickiso

pach

trend

run

nin

g

north

-sou

thalo

ng

Ran

ge

29W

1so

uth

of

Tow

nsh

ip9

,w

here

Un

it4

isstill

presen

t,su

gg

esta

south

ernex

pan

sion

of

the

Sin

clairF

ield

may

be

mo

resu

ccessful.

Isop

achan

dstru

ctural

evid

ence

sugg

estsb

lock

faultin

gm

ayh

ave

occu

rredin

the

western

section

sof

Ran

ge

28W

1so

uth

of

To

wn

ship

9.

Th

isfau

lting

wou

ldh

ave

resulted

inu

plift

and

the

subseq

uen

tero

sion

altru

ncatio

no

fU

nit

3an

dU

nit

4alo

ng

eastern

limits

of

Ran

ge

28W

1.

Th

efau

lttren

dm

ayserv

eas

ag

eolo

gical

boun

dary

ind

etermin

ing

the

easternbo

un

dary

of

the

Sin

clairF

ield.

Th

eid

entificatio

no

fa

fault

on

the

easterned

ge

of

the

BW

Aalo

ng

Ran

ges

24

and

25W

1,

coin

cidin

gw

ithw

ellsh

avin

gp

reserved

section

sof

Un

it4

,m

ayp

rov

ide

asim

ilarreserv

oir

inth

ew

est.

Fu

ture

po

tential

for

ano

ther

Sin

clair-typ

eo

ilp

laym

ayex

isteast

of

Ran

ge

24W

1.

Isop

ach

an

dS

tructu

re

Th

ereg

ion

aliso

pach

of

the

Th

reeF

ork

sg

enerally

thick

ens

eastto

west,

with

itsg

reatestth

ickness

ob

served

from

To

wn

ship

8R

ang

e

29W

1so

uth

toth

ein

ternatio

nal

Un

itedS

tatesbo

und

ary(F

igure

5).

Th

efo

rmatio

nth

ins

eastward

with

arap

idsu

ccessive

trun

cation

of

the

un

itso

fth

eT

hree

Fork

sto

ward

sth

eeast

(Fig

ure

6).

Th

eun

its

aretru

ncated

atth

ep

re-Mississip

pian

erosio

nal

surface.

Un

its3

and

4are

sharp

lytru

ncated

alon

ga

no

rth-so

uth

trend

betw

een

Ran

ges

28W

1an

d2

9W

1.

East

of

this

trun

cation

,th

eiso

pach

grad

ually

thin

seastw

ardto

ward

sth

esu

bcro

ped

ge,

easto

fR

ange

25W

1.

Un

its3

and

4are

preserv

eda

feww

ellsfar

toth

eeast

in

Ran

ges

24W

1an

d2

5W

1.

Ano

malo

us

thick

nesses

of

the

Th

ree

Fo

rks

Fo

rmatio

nare

alsono

tedin

wells

located

atV

irden

Field

.

Th

estru

cture

of

the

Th

reeF

ork

ssh

ow

sa

gen

eralnorth

west-

sou

theast

trend

,w

ithsy

nclin

alflex

tures

atS

inclair,

Daly

and

Vird

enF

ields

(Fig

ure

7).

Pro

noun

cedstru

ctural

hig

hs

occu

rin

the

Daly

Field

,m

imick

ing

tho

seseen

inth

eM

ississipp

ian(K

lassen,

1996

).A

pro

min

ent

syn

clinal

flextu

reo

fth

eco

nto

urs

isseen

inth

e

western

half

of

Tow

nsh

ip8

,R

ang

e28

W1.

Referen

ces

Ch

ristop

her,

J.E.,

196

1:

Tran

sition

alD

evon

ian-M

ississipp

ian

Fo

rmatio

ns

of

Sou

thern

Sask

atchew

an;

Sask

atchew

anM

ineral

Reso

urces,

Rep

ort

66

,1

03

p.

Dietrich

,J.,

M.T

ho

mas,

Z.H

ajnal,

P.R

edly

,C

.Zhu

,an

dJ.

Majo

row

icz,19

98

:B

asemen

t-Sed

imen

taryC

ov

erL

ink

ages

inth

e

Willisto

nB

asin,

So

uth

eastS

askatch

ewan

and

So

uth

west

Man

itob

a;M

anito

ba

Min

ing

and

Min

eralsC

on

ven

tion

Pro

gram

,

Nov

emb

er1998

,P

oster,

p.24.

McC

abe,

H.R

.,196

7:

Tecto

nic

Fram

ework

of

Paleo

zoic

Fo

rmatio

ns

inM

anito

ba;

Can

.In

st.M

inin

gM

et.,V

ol.

70

,p

p.1

80

-

189

.

Recommended