of 13
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
1/13
Presented By: Group 11
ubmitted To: Prof. Abhijeeth S.
7/21/2014
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
2/13
Beginning
Our water our future campaign. Deal worth of 5.2 billion for a period of 30 years and
1 month. Reasons Drought and population growth. Financing through PPP
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
3/13
Some aspects about PPP: Constrained government budgets. Encouraged efficiency in delivery of infrastructure
service. Tighter monitoring to ensure quality.
There should be real competition in PPP auction. Immovable infrastructure Bilateral monopoly. Difficult to punish non compliance by firm. Filter for White Elephants
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
4/13
Partnerships Victoria- Centralized authority for PPP withintention of growing the market- Adopted PSC(Public sectorComparator).PSC:1. Raw PSC = capital cost of construction + operating cost
2. Competitive Neutrality adjustment= Tax saving from publicownership.
3. Transferable Risk = Expected cost of risk transferred to pvtprovider.
4. Retained Risk = Expected cost of risk transferred togovernment
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
5/13
CAPM APPROACH
Systematic Risk HolderDiscount Rate = CAPM RATE
No systematic riskDiscount Rate = Risk free rate
*complication involved in different pattern of cash outlay.Revenue for AQUASURE
1. Monthly water security payment- Cover fixed cost2. Monthly water usage payments- As per amount
ordered.
AQUASURE was not entitiled to sell water to third party.!
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
6/13
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
7/13
Party involved Risk
Aquasure Throughput risk
The Sponsors Resource risk, Technical risk
The state of Victoria Socio political risk, Completion risk
D & C Contractor Completion risk
O & M Contractor O & M Failures
Transmission line operator Completion Risk
Electricity and REC provider (AGL Energy Ltd.) Throughput risk
Equity Providers Resource Risk
Debt Providers Completion risk, Interest rate risk
Risks Associated With The Project
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
8/13
Risk MitigatesThe key player's risks in the structuring of the project weremitigated in the following manner:
The State of Victoria:
The state would provide support by procuring alternativefunding
Procuring state supported guarantee for the debt funding
Termination of the project and payment of the relevanttermination
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
9/13
Risk Mitigates Pay out of the balance of any unrefined debt Price reset mechanism in case AGL technologies became
insolvent or a defaulter after 10 years.
Design and Construction Contractor:
To avoid the risk of undersupply and risk abatement toservice payments, the plant would be built with redundancyand additional capacity with parallel processing and modulardesign.
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
10/13
Risk MitigatesOperations and Maintenance Contractor:
The risks of failures were borne by O&M contractor butwere protected by joint and several guarantees by the parent
company.
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
11/13
Role of The State
The state was responsible for procuring the land fordesalination plant and related infrastructure. The state provided support for financing the project through
guaranteeing the debt project.
a) Global financial crisis b) Equity investors demanding higher returns & liquidity
premium.c) The consortium could only secure A$1.925 billiond) Remaining A$1.746 billion was to be syndicated to a wider
group of banks.
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
12/13
Role of The State
e) The state effectively acted as a lender-of-last-resort.
8/12/2019 PF Group 11 Aquasure
13/13
Thank You