+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity? Objective: I will...

Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity? Objective: I will...

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: owen-norris
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
31
Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity? Objective: I will be able to understand the impact that humans have on the environment. Agenda: Finish developing your argument and preparing for the Socratic Seminar tomorrow Homework: None Monday, April 6 th , 20
Transcript
Page 1: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?

Objective: I will be able to understand the impact that

humans have on the environment. Agenda:

Finish developing your argument and preparing for the Socratic Seminar tomorrow

Homework: None

Monday, April 6th, 2015

Page 2: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Socratic Seminar Rubric

• Preparation:   10 • Added to the dialogue of the group:   20 • Group Participation (Encouraged others/respectful

of ideas):   10 • Used textual evidence as support:   25• Listened and responded to previous comments:  

5 • Quality and Depth of Insight:   20 • Socratic Seminar self-reflection:   5 • Peer Sheets:   5

Total:   100

Page 3: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Continue on pg. 125

Should orcas (killer whales) be held in captivity?

Outline your argument and points you want to discuss during the debate

Be prepared to discuss these points with your opposition and plan to rebuttal their comments

You may research gather more evidence and catch your opposition off guard

Page 4: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue a side that you do or don’t agree with? Objective:

I will be able to understand the impact that humans have on the environment.

Agenda: Socratic Seminar!

“Should orcas be held in captivity” Homework:

Write Socratic paper if you didn’t speak during the seminar

Tuesday, April 7th, 2015

Page 5: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

RULES OF SOCRATIC SEMINARS

Rules of a Socratic Seminar

Page 6: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Quick overview of Socratic Seminar Everyone must participate in a

Socratic to get a grade Question is projected Ms. Barker will not interject Self reflection at end as well as peer

review

Page 7: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Keep in mind…

1) Take notes on the points made: Be prepared 2) Absolutely no side talking3) Do not interrupt others4) Listen carefully5) Don’t raise hands; take turns6) Be professional. Use Mr. and Miss. Formal

tone7) Speak up so all can hear you8) Absolutely no drawing or doing other

homework9) Discuss ideas rather than each other’s

opinions10)Stick to the point/make notes you want to

come back to

Page 8: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Keep in mind…

11)Try to add to or make a link with something someone else has said

12)Refer to the video/handout often! A seminar is not a test of memory. You are not “learning a subject,” you are aiming at understanding ideas, values and issues. Dig deeper. ASK WHY?

13)Avoid informal words: like, things, stuff, you know.

14)Don’t hog the show15)Have fun and work with each other. 16)Bring others into the conversation. You are

only as strong as your weakest link

Page 9: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Socratic Seminar Rubric

• Preparation:   10 • Added to the dialogue of the group:   20 • Group Participation (Encouraged others/respectful

of ideas):   10 • Used textual evidence as support:   25• Listened and responded to previous comments:  

5 • Quality and Depth of Insight:   20 • Socratic Seminar self-reflection:   5 • Peer Sheets:   5

Total:   100

Page 10: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Should orcas be held in captivity?

Page 11: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Absent or talked little during the Socratic this is your alt. assignment:

Write a 2 page paper answering the question: “Should orcas be held in captivity?”

Double spaced 12 pt. Times New Roman font Printed out and turned in by Friday 4/10

THIS IS A SUMMATIVE

Page 12: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Pg. 124 RTW: Did your opinion change from the beginning of our discussion to the debate? Objective:

I will organize my ISN and take a pre-test on the upcoming unit.

Agenda: Pre-test (grab clickers) Organize ISN

Homework: Write Socratic paper if you didn’t speak

during the seminar

Wednesday, April 8th, 2015

Page 13: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Pg. 124 RTW: How do we try to organize the organisms on our planet?

Objective: I will organize my ISN and take a pre-test

on the upcoming unit. Agenda:

Notes on Classification Homework:

Write Socratic paper if you didn’t speak during the seminar

Thursday, April 9th, 2015

Page 14: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Taxonomy:Organisms can be classified based on

physical similarities.

Page 15: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Taxonomy

= the science of naming and classifying organisms.

A taxon is a group of organisms in a classification system.

White oak:Quercus alba

Page 16: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Binomial nomenclature

= two-part scientific naming system.– uses Latin words – scientific names always written in italics – two parts are the genus name and species

descriptor

Page 17: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Tyto alba

A genus includes one or more physically similar species Species in the same genus are thought to be

closely related. Genus name is always capitalized.

A species descriptor is the second part of a scientific name. always lowercase always follows genus

name; never written alone

Page 18: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Scientific names help scientists to communicate. Some species have very similar common

names. Some species have many common names.

Page 19: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Linnaeus’ classification system

Each level is included in the level above it.

Levels get increasingly specific from kingdom to species

Page 20: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Linnaeus’ classification system Kingdom- Broadest category (i.e.:

Animalia) Phylum- (i.e.: Chordata) Class- (i.e.: Mammalia) Order- (i.e.: Carnivora) Family- (i.e.: Canidae) Genus- (i.e.: Canis) Species- Most specific (i.e.: Canis lupus)

Page 21: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

The Linnaean classification system has limitations. Linnaeus taxonomy doesn’t account for

molecular evidence. The technology didn’t exist during

Linneaus’ time. Linnaean system based only on physical

similarities.

Page 22: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Physical similarities are not always the result of close relationships.

Genetic similarities more accurately show evolutionary relationships.

Page 23: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

KEY CONCEPT Modern classification is based on evolutionary relationships.

Page 24: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Cladistics

= classification based on common ancestry

Phylogeny is the evolutionary history for a group of species. evidence from living species, fossil record,

and molecular data shown with branching tree diagrams

Page 25: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Cladistics

= is a common method to make evolutionary trees.

– classification based on common ancestry– species placed in order that they descended

from common ancestor

Page 26: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Cladistics

A cladogram is an evolutionary tree made using cladistics.

A clade is a group of species that shares a common ancestor.

– Each species in a clade shares some traits with the ancestor.

– Each species in aclade has traits that have changed.

Page 27: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

• Derived characters are traits shared in different degrees by clade members.

FOUR LIMBS WITH DIGITS

Tetrapoda clade1

Amniota clade2

Reptilia clade3Diapsida clade4

Archosauria clade5

EMBRYO PROTECTED BY AMNIOTIC FLUID

OPENING IN THE SIDE OF THE SKULL

SKULL OPENINGS IN FRONT OF THE EYE &

IN THE JAW

FEATHERS & TOOTHLESS BEAKS.

SKULL OPENINGS BEHIND THE EYE

DERIVED CHARACTER

– basis of arranging species in cladogram

– more closely related species share more derived characters

– represented on cladogram as hash marks

Page 28: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

FOUR LIMBS WITH DIGITS

• Nodes represent the most recent common ancestor of a clade.

• Clades can be identified by snipping a branch under a node.

Tetrapoda clade1

Amniota clade2

Reptilia clade3Diapsida clade4

Archosauria clade5

EMBRYO PROTECTED BY AMNIOTIC FLUID

OPENING IN THE SIDE OF THE SKULL

SKULL OPENINGS IN FRONT OF THE EYE AND IN THE JAW

FEATHERS AND TOOTHLESS BEAKS.

SKULL OPENINGS BEHIND THE EYE

NODE

DERIVED CHARACTER

CLADE

Page 29: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Molecular evidence reveals species’ relatedness. Molecular data may confirm

classification based on physical similarities.

Molecular data may lead scientists to propose a new classification.

• DNA is usually given the last word by scientists.

Page 30: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

Pg. 124 RTW: Create an acronym to remember the classification system (K.P.C.O.F.G.S.) Objective:

I will organize my ISN and take a pre-test on the upcoming unit.

Agenda: Classification Activity

Homework: None

Friday, April 10th, 2015

Page 31: Pg. 124 RTW: Would you rather argue if all animals should be held in captivity?  Objective:  I will be able to understand the impact that humans have.

CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS

Write and answer these below your classification chart:

1.On what basis did you initially separate organisms?

2.After the initial grouping, what characteristics did you use as distinguishing factors?

3.Specify the kingdoms that were noted in your separations (your very first division)

4. In terms of shared characteristics, what happens as you make more subdivisions?


Recommended