Date post: | 08-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Presentations & Public Speaking |
Upload: | kartik-vora |
View: | 172 times |
Download: | 1 times |
www.issehs.com
Analysis of Exposure Monitoring Results and Analysis of Exposure Monitoring Results and Lessons Learned – Pharmaceutical Unit Lessons Learned – Pharmaceutical Unit OperationsOperations
Maharshi Mehta, CSP, CIHMaharshi Mehta, CSP, CIHPrasanth K., CIH, Gopal C.Prasanth K., CIH, Gopal C.International Safety Systems, Inc.International Safety Systems, Inc.
11
Pharma Forum 2016Pharma Forum 2016AIHCE, Baltimore, May 25AIHCE, Baltimore, May 25
www.issehs.com
ObjectivesObjectives
Analyze API and surrogate monitoring results Analyze API and surrogate monitoring results Identify exposures at unit operations Identify exposures at unit operations Identify effectiveness of exposure controls Identify effectiveness of exposure controls Identify exposure contributory factorsIdentify exposure contributory factors Reduce future exposure monitoring Reduce future exposure monitoring Implement exposure controls based on lessons learned Implement exposure controls based on lessons learned
22
This study is beginning of long term study of 10000+ sampling results
www.issehs.com
Results OriginResults Origin
~ 5500 results of API and surrogates~ 5500 results of API and surrogates 100+ workplaces 100+ workplaces 21+ countries21+ countries Over a period of last 7 years Over a period of last 7 years Personal and area sampling Personal and area sampling APIs and surrogates APIs and surrogates Only air samples considered, not wipe Only air samples considered, not wipe 11 ISS professionals were involved in collecting data11 ISS professionals were involved in collecting data Only ISS collected data is considered at this time Only ISS collected data is considered at this time
33
www.issehs.com
www.issehs.com
USAUSA CanadaCanada Mexico Mexico BrazilBrazil ColumbiaColumbia Argentina Argentina
Results Origin: AmericasResults Origin: Americas
www.issehs.com
Results Origin : AsiaResults Origin : Asia
IndiaIndia China China SingaporeSingapore IndonesiaIndonesia JapanJapan Australia Australia
www.issehs.com
Austria Austria Germany Germany Netherland Netherland France France Ireland Ireland Portugal Portugal Italy Italy Spain Spain UKUK
Results Origin: EuropeResults Origin: Europe
www.issehs.com
Challenges Challenges
Result variability – GSD Result variability – GSD Work practices dependent Work practices dependent Engineering controls and particulate Engineering controls and particulate
containment variability containment variability Weight of API/surrogateWeight of API/surrogate
77
www.issehs.com
Methods – API/Surrogate Sampling Methods – API/Surrogate Sampling and Analysisand Analysis Only validated methods from AIHA accredited lab with Only validated methods from AIHA accredited lab with
pharma analytical expertise used and anlyzedpharma analytical expertise used and anlyzed Written protocol for sampling used Written protocol for sampling used
– Sample flow rates/volumeSample flow rates/volume– MediaMedia– Avoiding cross contamination Avoiding cross contamination – Each sample in zip-lock plastic bag Each sample in zip-lock plastic bag
ISPE protocol used for surrogate monitoring ISPE protocol used for surrogate monitoring
88
www.issehs.com
Method – Data Analysis Method – Data Analysis
Sampling notes entered in result sheets in Excel® was Sampling notes entered in result sheets in Excel® was available workplacesavailable workplaces
Result sheets were standardized Result sheets were standardized – Sample id, Sample id, – Sample duration, Sample duration, – Unit OperationsUnit Operations– Weight of API/SurrogateWeight of API/Surrogate– Controls provided Controls provided
Results were sortedResults were sorted
99
www.issehs.com
Unit operations for statistical Unit operations for statistical analysesanalyses As a first stage of the analysis, unit operations with less As a first stage of the analysis, unit operations with less
variability selected variability selected – Laboratory scale weighing with controls (VBSE, or laboratory Laboratory scale weighing with controls (VBSE, or laboratory
fume hoods) and without controlsfume hoods) and without controls– Weighing dispensing in isolatorWeighing dispensing in isolator– Charging/discharging with split butterfly valveCharging/discharging with split butterfly valve– Weighing and dispensing in Laminar Flow BoothWeighing and dispensing in Laminar Flow Booth– QC samplingQC sampling
500 + results separated for above unit operations and for 500 + results separated for above unit operations and for weight of API/surrogate weight of API/surrogate
1010
www.issehs.com
Statistical Analysis Tool usedStatistical Analysis Tool used
IHSTAT®IHSTAT®– From AIHA Exposure Assessment CommitteeFrom AIHA Exposure Assessment Committee
IHData Analyst® (Bayesian Data Analysis)IHData Analyst® (Bayesian Data Analysis) Results for the unit operations were entered Results for the unit operations were entered Results were separated for weight range Results were separated for weight range 9595thth%tile point estimate and GSD were determine %tile point estimate and GSD were determine Lognormal distribution was determinedLognormal distribution was determined
1111
www.issehs.com
Results and preliminary Results and preliminary conclusions – Qualifiers conclusions – Qualifiers The results are indicative and not confirmative The results are indicative and not confirmative The conclusion from the results and lessons learned are The conclusion from the results and lessons learned are
also indicative and not confirmativealso indicative and not confirmative Additional study is neededAdditional study is needed
1212
www.issehs.com
Personal exposure: Laboratory Scale Personal exposure: Laboratory Scale weighing in VBSEweighing in VBSE
Sample size: 10Sample size: 10 Range of results: < 0.04 – 0.41 Range of results: < 0.04 – 0.41 μμg/mg/m33 Sample Duration: 27 - 34 MinutesSample Duration: 27 - 34 Minutes Sample Weight: < 1 gramSample Weight: < 1 gram GSD: 2.59GSD: 2.59 9595thth%ile – 1.57 %ile – 1.57 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis is not Lognormal distribution hypothesis is not
rejectedrejected
1313
www.issehs.com
Personal exposure: Laboratory Personal exposure: Laboratory weighing- no exposure controls weighing- no exposure controls
Sample size: 12 Sample size: 12 Range of results: 0.078 – 3.84 Range of results: 0.078 – 3.84 μμg/mg/m33 Sample Duration: 5 – 15 minutesSample Duration: 5 – 15 minutes Sample Weight: < 1 gramSample Weight: < 1 gram GSD – 4.48GSD – 4.48 9595thth%ile – 4.21 %ile – 4.21 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis is not Lognormal distribution hypothesis is not
rejectedrejected
1414
www.issehs.com
Comparison of laboratory scale weighing Comparison of laboratory scale weighing resultsresults
1515
www.issehs.com
Lessons Learned-Laboratory Lessons Learned-Laboratory WeighingWeighing Initial Indication – For < grams of weighingInitial Indication – For < grams of weighing
– OEB 5 (< ug/mOEB 5 (< ug/m33) and low OEB 4 (>1 ug/m3 and < 10 ug/m) and low OEB 4 (>1 ug/m3 and < 10 ug/m33) compounds ) compounds may require isolator may require isolator
– VBE could be used for OEB 4 compounds coupled with sound work-practices VBE could be used for OEB 4 compounds coupled with sound work-practices and PPEand PPE
Work-practices contributing to high exposuresWork-practices contributing to high exposures– Using brush to clean surfacesUsing brush to clean surfaces– Removing API container and other tools out without wipe cleaning and Removing API container and other tools out without wipe cleaning and
without double plastic bags without double plastic bags All size and types of enclosures are used – use only VBSE that All size and types of enclosures are used – use only VBSE that
meets specifications meets specifications – HEPA filterHEPA filter– Port for removal of waste Port for removal of waste
1616
www.issehs.com
Personal exposure: Dispensing inside Isolator Personal exposure: Dispensing inside Isolator (Weight Range 20 Kg – 40 Kg)(Weight Range 20 Kg – 40 Kg)
1717
Sample size: 16 Sample size: 16 Range of results: 0.025 Range of results: 0.025 μμg/mg/m33 – –
4.6 4.6 μμg/mg/m33 Sample Duration: 30 – 60 minutesSample Duration: 30 – 60 minutes Sample Weight : 20 – 40 Kg’s Sample Weight : 20 – 40 Kg’s GSD: 4.3GSD: 4.3 9595thth%ile exposure: 3.15 %ile exposure: 3.15 μμg/mg/m33
Lognormal distribution hypothesis Lognormal distribution hypothesis is not rejectedis not rejected
www.issehs.com
Between the two glove ports of main dispensing Between the two glove ports of main dispensing chamber (Weight range: 20 – 40 Kg)chamber (Weight range: 20 – 40 Kg)
Sample size: 9 Sample size: 9 Range of results: < 0.004 Range of results: < 0.004 μμg/mg/m33 – –
0.58 0.58 μμg/mg/m33 Sample Duration: 30 – 60 minutesSample Duration: 30 – 60 minutes Sample Weight : 20 – 40 Kg Sample Weight : 20 – 40 Kg GSD: 3.84GSD: 3.84 9595thth%ile: 1.62 %ile: 1.62 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis Lognormal distribution hypothesis
is not rejectedis not rejected
1818
www.issehs.com
Adjacent to RTP/Pass box (Weight range: 20 Adjacent to RTP/Pass box (Weight range: 20 Kg – 40 Kg) Kg – 40 Kg)
1919
Sample size: 18 Sample size: 18 Range of results: 0.055 Range of results: 0.055
μμg/mg/m33 – 2.43 – 2.43 μμg/mg/m33 Sample Duration: 30 – 60 Sample Duration: 30 – 60
minutesminutes Sample Weight : 20 – 40 KgSample Weight : 20 – 40 Kg GSD: 2.9GSD: 2.9 9595thth%ile: 1.88 %ile: 1.88 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution Lognormal distribution
hypothesis is not rejectedhypothesis is not rejected
www.issehs.com
9595thth%ile for Dispensing inside Isolator (for %ile for Dispensing inside Isolator (for weight range of 20-40 Kg)weight range of 20-40 Kg)
2020
www.issehs.com
Lessons Learned-Isolator Lessons Learned-Isolator
Do not assume exposure will be below OEB 4-5 APIs as isolator Do not assume exposure will be below OEB 4-5 APIs as isolator is used. is used.
Best of isolator would not reduce exposures if work practices are Best of isolator would not reduce exposures if work practices are not followed:not followed:– API container when received has no contamination outside?API container when received has no contamination outside?– In double plastic bags?In double plastic bags?– Isolator integrity test before being used?Isolator integrity test before being used?– Make-shift or real isolator?Make-shift or real isolator?– Disposable spatula and tools used? Wiped and in double plastic bags Disposable spatula and tools used? Wiped and in double plastic bags
before removing?before removing? Develop detailed SOP on selecting, validating and using isolatorDevelop detailed SOP on selecting, validating and using isolator
2121
www.issehs.com
Personal Exposure: Charging/Discharging Personal Exposure: Charging/Discharging using SBV (15 Kg – 60 Kg)using SBV (15 Kg – 60 Kg)
Sample size: 21Sample size: 21 Results range: 0.028 Results range: 0.028 μμg/mg/m33 - - 4.264.26
μμg/mg/m33 SSample Duration: 30 – 90 ample Duration: 30 – 90
minutesminutes Sample Weight: 15 kg – 60 kg Sample Weight: 15 kg – 60 kg GSD : 4.17GSD : 4.17 9595thth %ile : 7.69 %ile : 7.69 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis is Lognormal distribution hypothesis is
not rejectednot rejected
2222
www.issehs.com
Area Sample: Charging (weight range: 15 Kg – Area Sample: Charging (weight range: 15 Kg – 60 Kg)60 Kg)
Sample size: 44Sample size: 44 Results range: 0.032 – 21.6 Results range: 0.032 – 21.6 μμg/mg/m33 SSample Duration: 30 – 90 minutesample Duration: 30 – 90 minutes Sample Weight 15 kg – 60 kg Sample Weight 15 kg – 60 kg GSD: 3.7GSD: 3.7 9595thth %%ile: 3.53 ile: 3.53 μμg/mg/m33
Lognormal distribution hypothesis is Lognormal distribution hypothesis is not rejectednot rejected
2323
www.issehs.com
9595thth %ile results: Charging with SBV %ile results: Charging with SBV
2424
www.issehs.com
Lessons Learned - Lessons Learned - SBVSBV
Don not assume installation of SBV will reduce Don not assume installation of SBV will reduce particulate emissions below OEB 4/5 OELs. particulate emissions below OEB 4/5 OELs.
Selection, installation, use/misuse and maintenance of Selection, installation, use/misuse and maintenance of SBV resulted in to high area concentrationsSBV resulted in to high area concentrations
Carefully select supplier – initial cost may be high – long Carefully select supplier – initial cost may be high – long term cost savings and exposure reduction benefits could term cost savings and exposure reduction benefits could be significantbe significant
2525
www.issehs.com
Personal exposure: API Dispensing Inside Personal exposure: API Dispensing Inside LFB (LFB (Weight: 500 grams – 1.5 kg ) Weight: 500 grams – 1.5 kg )
2626
Sample size: 14Sample size: 14 Results range: 0.077 Results range: 0.077 μμg/mg/m33 - - 128128
μμg/mg/m33 SSample Duration: 15 – 60 min.ample Duration: 15 – 60 min. Sample GSD : 7.09Sample GSD : 7.09 9595thth %tile : 94 %tile : 94 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis
is not rejected
www.issehs.com
Personal exposure: API QC sampling inside Personal exposure: API QC sampling inside LFB (60 grams) (results from single site)LFB (60 grams) (results from single site)
Sample size: 14Sample size: 14 Results range: 0.108 Results range: 0.108 μμg/mg/m33 – 15.9 – 15.9 μμg/mg/m33 SSample Duration: 15 – 30 minutesample Duration: 15 – 30 minutes GSD : 5.11GSD : 5.11 9595thth %ile: 21.1 %ile: 21.1 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis is Lognormal distribution hypothesis is
not rejectednot rejected
2727
www.issehs.com
Personal exposure: API QC sampling inside Personal exposure: API QC sampling inside LFB (10-100 grams) – Multiple site dataLFB (10-100 grams) – Multiple site data
Sample size: 23Sample size: 23 Results range: 0.108 Results range: 0.108 μμg/mg/m33 – 196 – 196 μμg/mg/m33 SSample Duration: 15 – 30 minutesample Duration: 15 – 30 minutes GSD : 8.05GSD : 8.05 9595thth %ile: 147 %ile: 147 μμg/mg/m33 Lognormal distribution hypothesis is Lognormal distribution hypothesis is
not rejectednot rejected
2828
www.issehs.com
Lessons Learned during Lessons Learned during Dispensing/QC sampling under LFBDispensing/QC sampling under LFB
Focus on QC sampling same or even more than weighing and Focus on QC sampling same or even more than weighing and dispensingdispensing– Although API weight sampled is much lower than Although API weight sampled is much lower than
weighing/dispensing, exposure is likely to be highweighing/dispensing, exposure is likely to be high– Opening of containers for sampling – opening and closing of poly Opening of containers for sampling – opening and closing of poly
bag and breathing zone near bags during QC samplingbag and breathing zone near bags during QC sampling– Standardization of exposure controls (LFB) is important
What pharma IH community believed is confirmed What pharma IH community believed is confirmed – API exposure is not likely to be below < 50 API exposure is not likely to be below < 50 μμg/mg/m33 during during
weighing/dispensing in LFBweighing/dispensing in LFB– Work practices significantly contribute to higher exposuresWork practices significantly contribute to higher exposures
2929
www.issehs.com
Summary: 95Summary: 95thth %ile personal exposure results %ile personal exposure results
3030
www.issehs.com
SummarySummary
3131
Limited sampling results analysis of the selected unit operations Limited sampling results analysis of the selected unit operations identified:identified:– Personal exposure levels likely to occurPersonal exposure levels likely to occur
Additional data analysis and professional judgement would assist in Additional data analysis and professional judgement would assist in implementing controls and work-practices that would reduce implementing controls and work-practices that would reduce exposure below target levelsexposure below target levels
Add required data collection Add required data collection – Sample weightSample weight– Name/brand name/picture of controlsName/brand name/picture of controls
www.issehs.com
Summary Summary
PPE and RPE are standardized across all pharma sites for PPE and RPE are standardized across all pharma sites for some companiessome companies– Same approach is needed for pharma containment Same approach is needed for pharma containment
equipment also equipment also Installation of equipment is not enough; SOPs, training Installation of equipment is not enough; SOPs, training
and maintenance are even more critical and maintenance are even more critical Participate in exposure control selection processParticipate in exposure control selection process
3232
www.issehs.com
Plans Plans
Invite IHs from other companies and form a group Invite IHs from other companies and form a group Conduct similar data analyses with larger sample sizeConduct similar data analyses with larger sample size Address lessons learned from this limited study Address lessons learned from this limited study
– Weight rangeWeight range– Specific details on engineering controls Specific details on engineering controls
Peer reviewPeer review PublishPublish
3333
www.issehs.com
Recognition Recognition
Terry Lane from Merck for reviewTerry Lane from Merck for review Perry Logan for insights on analysis using BDA toolPerry Logan for insights on analysis using BDA tool Current and previous ISS team who diligently conducted Current and previous ISS team who diligently conducted
exposure monitoring exposure monitoring Ankit Sharma, Gopal and Prasanth from ISS who Ankit Sharma, Gopal and Prasanth from ISS who
complied and summarized results complied and summarized results
3434
www.issehs.com
Volunteers participate in Volunteers participate in rigorous study? Publication of rigorous study? Publication of papers? papers?
Thank you Thank you
3535