Date post: | 16-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | claude-freeman |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PharmaconutritionA New Emerging Paradigm
Daren K. Heyland, MD, FRCPC, MScProfessor of Medicine,
Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
The First Ever Recorded Clinical Trial
[Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, carried away children of Israel, into his court ]
5 And the king appointed them a daily provision of the king's meat, and of the wine which he drank:
8 Daniel would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat, nor with the wine
10 Prince of the eunuchs said unto Daniel, I fear the king, who hath appointed your meat and your drink: for why should he see your faces worse liking than the children which are of your sort? then shall ye make me endanger my head to the king.
Book of Daniel 1:1-15
11 Then said Daniel to Melzar, whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel,
12 Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink.
13 Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee, and the countenance of the children that eat of the portion of the king's meat: and as thou seest, deal with thy servants.
14 So he consented to them in this matter, 15 And at the end of ten days their countenances appeared
fairer and fatter in flesh than all the children which did eat the portion of the king's meat.
The First Ever Recorded Clinical Trial
Book of Daniel 1:1-15
16 [from all the children of Israel in the King’s Court] Thus Melzar took away the portion of their meat, and the wine that they should drink; and gave them pulse.
Translating Research Findings into Practice !
Book of Daniel 1:1-16
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Updated October 2008
Summarizes 198 trials studying 21283 patients
34 topics 17 recommendations
Validation of the CPG’s: Results of a Prospective Observational
Study • Summary
– Patients and Sites that were more consistent with CPG recommendations tended to receive more EN
Adoption of Canadian CPGs will likely lead to improved nutrition support practices in ICUs
Heyland CCM 2004;32:2260
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Our efforts to translate best evidence into practice!
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Immunonutrition
• Specific nutrients found to have effects on immune system, metabolism, and GI structure and functionArginineGlutamineOmega-3 fatty acidsNucleic acidsothers
GlutamineGlutamineArginineArginine
Largest Randomized Trial of Immunonutrition
Good Methods Multicenter RCT double-blinded ITT analysis
Heterogeneous group of patients (597) Elective and urgent surgery (50%) Trauma (8%) Medical including septic (42%)
high protein entered formula enriched with
arginine (10 g/L), Glutamine Antioxidants omega 3 FAs (Stresson®)
0102030405060708090
100
Hospital Mortality
StressonControl
No other differences in Outcome
No subgroup differences
Kieft Int Care Med 2005;31:524
Updated Analysis: Effect on Mortality
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Updated Analysis:Effect on Infectious
Complications
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Why is it not working?
Old
Immunonutrition
New
Pharmaconutrients
Nutrition Nutrients
Combined nutrients Single nutrients
Heterogeneous populations
Homogenous
Patients
Weak methods Rigorous
Small single center Large multicenter
Heyland Int Care Med 2005;31:501
Nutrition vs Nutrients
Impacts mortality! arginine
glutamine antioxidants
omega-3 fatty acids
Impacts morbidity EN vs PNEarly EN
small bowel feeding
Pharmaconutrients Impact Outcomes!
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
1 10 1000.1.01
Glutamine
Antioxidants
Fish/Borage OilsPlus AOX
Effect on Mortality
Arginine
Nutrition vs Nutrients• Vitamin A Supplementation for extremely Low Birth
weight Infants reduces chronic lung diseaseNEJM 1999;340:1962
• B carotene supplementation in AIDS associated with improved survival
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2006;60:1266
• N-3 fatty acids associated with survival advantage post-MI
Circulation 2002; 105: 1897
• L-Arginine associated with higher post infarction mortality
JAMA 2006; 295: 58
Examples of Placebo-controlled trials where nutrients are tested in addition to standard care
Cocktail Approach? • Specific nutrients found to have effects on
immune system, metabolism, and GI structure and functionArginineGlutamineOmega-3 fatty acidsNucleic acidsothers
• Rationale for combining substances into products?
Elective
Surgery
Critically Ill
General Septic Trauma Burns Acute Lung Injury
Arginine Benefit No benefit Harm No benefit No benefit No benefit
Glutamine Benefit PN Beneficial
(? receiving EN)
… EN Possibly
Beneficial
EN Possibly
Beneficial
…
Omega 3 FFA
… … … … … Beneficial
Antioxidants … Possible Benefit
… … … …
Population
Nutrients
Pharmaconutrition: Which Nutrient for Which Population?
Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines JPEN 2003;27:355
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
=
Homogenous Patient Populations?
Effect of Parenteral Nutrition on Mortality
Risk ratio (log scale)
Malnourished
Non-malnourished
Quality score <7
Quality score >= 7
Published before 1988
Published after 1989
Lipids
No Lipids
Critically Ill
Surgical
Overall Effect0.1 1 10
TPN Benefical
TPN Harmful
Mortality
p=0.12
p=0.07
p=0.025
Heyland JAMA 1998
Heyland JAMA 2001;286:944
Effect of Immunonutrition: A meta-analysis
Mucosal Barrier Integrity
Inflammation
Cellular Immune Function
Oxidative StressMito
Function
In Search of the Magic Nutraceutical
Largest Randomized Trial of Antioxidants
Multicenter RCT in Germany double-blinded non-ITT analysis
249 patients with severe sepsis
standard nutrition plus 1000 ug bolus followed by 1000 ug/day or placebo x14 days
0102030405060708090
100
28 day Mortality
SeleniumPlacebo
Greater treatment effect observed in those
patients with: •supra normal levels vs normal levels of selenium
•Higher APACHE III
•More than 3 organ failures Crit Care Med 2007;135:1
p=0.11
Influence of early antioxidant supplements on clinical evolution and organ function in critically ill cardiac surgery, major trauma and subarachnoid
hemorrhage patients.
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 1 2 3 4 5
CardiacTraumaSAH
CRP levels daily in the Control groups
Significant reduction with AOX in Cardiac and Trauma but not SAH
Berger Crit Care 2008
RCT 200 patients IV supplements for 5 days
after admission (Se 270 mcg, Zn 30 mg, Vit C 1.1 g, Vit B1 100 mg) with a double loading dose on days 1 and 2 (AOX group), or placebo.
No affect on clinical outcomes
Effect of Antioxidants on Mortality:Relationship to Control Group Mortality
Baseline Risk of Patients Impacts on Magnitude of Treatment Effect
A meta-analysis found calcuim supplementation to be effective in preventing preeclampsia
Large RCT found no risk reduction in health nulliparous women
Exploration of heterogeneity across studies Stratify for high and low baseline risk
JAMA 1999;282:664
JAMA 1999;282:664
Baseline Risk of Patients Impacts on Magnitude of Treatment Effect
Why is it not working?
Old
(Immunonutrition)
New
(Pharmaconutrients)
Nutrition Nutrients
Combined nutrients Single nutrients
Heterogeneous populations
Homogenous
Patients
Weak methods Rigorous
Small single center Large multicenter
A Review of the True Methodological Quality of Nutrition Support Trials
Conducted in the Critically Ill: Time for Improvement!
• Appraised the methodological quality of 111 nutrition RCTs and compared to sepsis trials in ICU setting
• Compared to sepsis trials, nutrition trials were:– less likely to use blinding (31% vs 80%)
– less likely to present ITT analysis (58% vs 93%).
– less likely to conceal randomization (17% vs 30%)
– more likely to have excessive amounts of lost to follow up (18% vs 0)
Doig Anesth Analg 2005;100:527-33
REducing Deaths from OXidative Stress:
The REDOXS study
A multicenter randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidant
supplementation in critical illness
Effect of Glutamine in the Critically ill Patient: Mortality
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Effect of Combined Antioxidant
Strategies in the Critically Ill
www.criticalcarenutrition.com
Mortality
The Research Protocol
In enterally fed, critically ill patients with a clinical evidence of acute multi organ dysfunction – What is the effect of glutamine
supplementation compared to placebo– What is the effect of antioxidant
supplementation compared to placebo
…on 28 day mortality?
The Question(s)
1200 ICU patientsEvidence of
organ failureR
glutamine
placebo
ConcealedStratified by
site
R
R
antioxidants
placebo
Factorial 2x2 design
placebo
antioxidants Shock
REducing Deaths from OXidative Stress:
The REDOXS study
Group Enteral Supplement Parenteral Supplement (Glutamine AOX) (Glutamine AOX)
A Glutamine + AOX + Glutamine + Selenium
B Placebo + AOX + Placebo + Selenium
C Glutamine + Placebo + Glutamine + Placebo
D Placebo + Placebo + Placebo + Placebo
Combined Entered and Parental Nutrients
Glutamine Dipeptides • Free L-glutamine has limited solubility and stability
• Synthetic dipeptides (ala-gln, gly-gln) overcome these difficulties
• 8.5 gms of dipeptide=6 gms of glutamine
Vit C 1500 mg
Vit E 500 mg
B-carotene 10 mg
Zinc 20mg
Selenium 300ug
Glutamine 30 gms
Optimal Dose?
• High vs Low dose: – observations of meta-analysis
• Providing experimental nutrients in addition to standard enteral diets
Optimizing the Dose of Glutamine Dipeptides
and Antioxidants in Critically ill Patients:
A phase 1 dose finding study of glutamine and antioxidant
supplementation in critical illness
Heyland JPEN 2007;31:109
The Research Protocol
In critically ill patients with a clinical evidence of hypoperfusion...
• What is the maximal tolerable dose (MTD) of glutamine dipeptides and antioxidants as judged by its effect on multiorgan dysfunction?
The Question
The Research Protocol
• Single Center • Open-label • Dose-ranging study • Prospective controls
The Design
• Critically Ill patients in shock
Patients
The Research ProtocolIntervention
GroupN Dose of Dipeptides (glutamine)
Parenterally*(gm/kg/day)
Enterally^(gm/day)
AOX
1 30 0 0 0
2 7 .5 (.35) 0 0
3 7 .5 (.35) 21 (15) ½ can
4 7 .5 (.35) 42 (30) full can
5 7 .5 (.35) 42 (30) full can + 500ug
IV Selenium
The Research ProtocolOutcomes
•Primary: ∆SOFA• Secondary (groups 2-5);
• Plasma levels of Se, Zn , and vitamins• TBARS• Glutathione • Mitochondrial function (ratio)
Control
N = 30
Group 2
N =7
Group 3
N= 7
Group 4
N= 7
Group 5
N=7
All
N=58
Age (Mean) 64.2 65.5 65.2 65.6 71.8 65.6
Female (%) 11 (37%) 2(29%) 1(14%) 2(29%) 3(43%) 19(33%)
APACHE II score (Mean) 23.2 25.1 22.1 21.9 20.6 22.8
Etiology of shock
Cardiogenic (%)
Septic (%)
Hypovolemic (%)
6 (86%)
1(14%)
3 (43%)
4 (57%)
3 (43%)
4 (57%)
1(14%)
5(71%)
1(14%)
13(46%)
14(50%)
1(4%)
ICU days (Median) 6.4 14.3 7.9 13.1 9.7 8.0
28 day mortality (%) 9(30%) 3(43%) 2(29%) 3(43%) 1(14%) 18(31%)
Baseline Characteristics
4 vs 5: p=0.17
Total SOFA Score for Control Group
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 2802468
101214161820
Expired IndividualsIndividuals
Reg Line
P=<0.0001
Day
To
tal
So
fa S
co
re
Total SOFA Score for Group 2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 2802468
101214161820
IndividualsExpired IndividualsReg Line
P=0.0897
Day
To
tal
So
fa S
co
re
Total SOFA Score for Group 3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 2802468
101214161820
IndividualsExpired IndividualsReg Line
P= <0.0001
Day
To
tal
So
fa s
co
re
Total SOFA Score for Group 4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 2802468
101214161820
Individuals
Expired Individuals
Reg Line
P= 0.0467
Day
To
tal
So
fa S
co
re
Total SOFA Score for Group 5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 2802468
101214161820
IndividualsExpired IndividualsReg Line
P= 0.0005
Day
To
tal
So
fa S
co
re
Total SOFA Regression Lines
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1402468
101214161820
ControlGroup 2Group 3
Group 4Group 5
P=0.1941
Day
To
tal
SO
FA
Sco
re
Effect on SOFA
Inferences
• High dose appears safe • High dose associated with
– no worsening of SOFA Scores
– greater resolution of oxidative stress
– greater preservation of glutathione
– Improved mitochondrial function
Heyland JPEN Mar 2007
Parenterally Enterally
Glutamine/day 0.35 gms/kg 30 gms
Antioxidantsper day
500 mcg Selenium
Vit C 1500 mgVit E 500 mg
B carotene 10 mgZinc 20 mgSe 300 ug
REDOXS: A new paradigm!
• Nutrients dissociated from nutrition• Focus on single nutrient administration• Rigorous, large scale, multicenter trial
of nutrition related intervention powered to look at mortality
• High risk, sick homogenous population • Preceded by:
– standardization of nutrition support thru the development and implementation of CPGs
– a dosing optimizing study• Funded by CIHR
ConclusionsNutrition Therapy : Modulating the Stress Response
Adjunctive Supportive Care
Proactive Primary Therapy
Implications of the New Paradigm?
• Research– explosion of research opportunities
– Methodological challenges
• Education– included in critical care curriculum?
• Models of Care Delivery– Expect Physicians to order pharmaconutrients just like
they order antibiotics? who will they consult for difficult cases? Revitalized Nutrition Support Teams?
Blind Administration of Pharmacologically Active
Nutrients?
Hotchkiss NEJM 2003;348:138
Pharmaconutrition: The Future
o Which nutrient?o What patient?o At what time point?o For how long?