Phenethyl caffeate benzoxanthene lignan is a derivative of caffeicacid phenethyl ester that induces bystander autophagy in WiDrcells
Vinod Vijayakurup • Carmela Spatafora •
Corrado Tringali • Padmakrishnan Chorakkode Jayakrishnan •
Priya Srinivas • Srinivas Gopala
Received: 15 December 2012 / Accepted: 26 October 2013 / Published online: 5 November 2013
� Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Abstract We recently reported that Phenethyl caffeate
benzoxanthene lignan (PCBL), a semisynthetic compound
derived from Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE), indu-
ces DNA damage and apoptosis in tumor cells. In this
study, we further investigated whether PCBL induces
autophagy in WiDr cells. We also analyzed the pathways
regulating autophagy and the role of autophagy in PCBL-
induced cell death. Our acridine orange staining and LC3 II
expression results suggest that PCBL induces autophago-
somes in WiDr cells. The levels of LC3 II expression we
observed after co-treatment of PCBL with bafilomycin A1
and the reductions in p62 expression we observed after
PCBL treatment in WiDr cells demonstrate increased
autophagic flux, a reliable indicator of autophagic induc-
tion. The increased Beclin 1 expression in PCBL-treated
cells and the incapacity of PCBL to induce LC3 II in
3-methyladenine (3-MA)-treated cells we observed sug-
gests that PCBL-induced autophagy is class III PI3-kinase
dependent. PCBL did not alter phosphorylation of the
mTOR substrate p70 S6 kinase, indicating that PCBL-
induced autophagy was not mTOR regulated. Two
autophagy related proteins, Atg5 and Atg12, also remained
uninduced during PCBL treatment. The increased caspase
activity and expression levels of LC3 II and p62 we
observed in response to PCBL treatment in primary glioma
cells demonstrates that PCBL-induced apoptosis and
autophagy were not cell line specific. Pharmacological
inhibition of autophagy did not alter the antitumor efficacy
of PCBL in WiDr cells. This attests to the bystander nature
of PCBL-induced autophagy (in terms of cell death). In
toto, these data suggest that PCBL induces a class III
kinase dependent, but mTOR independent, bystander mode
of autophagy in WiDr cells.
Keywords Autophagy � Lignan � Caffeic acid �Cancer
Introduction
Autophagy is a catabolic process that degrades cellular
components through lysosomal machinery. During
autophagy, cytoplasmic constituents such as exhausted out
organelles or damaged proteins are sequestered into
double membrane vesicles called autophagosomes and are
subsequently delivered to lysosomes for degradation and
recycling [1]. Although it is generally considered a
mechanism to maintain cellular homeostasis, the role of
induced autophagy in tumor cells in response to chemo-
therapeutic drugs remains a topic of controversy [2]. It
can act as a pro-survival or death mechanism in tumor
cells depending on the cellular context and the mode and
intensity of chemotherapeutic insults [3–5]. Autophagy, as
a part of survival responses in tumor cells, is capable of
removing proteins and organelles that are critically
V. Vijayakurup � P. C. Jayakrishnan � S. Gopala (&)
Department of Biochemistry, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for
Medical Science and Technology, Thiruvanathapuram 695011,
India
e-mail: [email protected]
C. Spatafora � C. Tringali (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Universita degli Studi di
Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
P. Srinivas
Integrated Cancer Research Program V, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for
Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram 695014, India
123
Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94
DOI 10.1007/s11033-013-2840-8
damaged because of the stress induced by chemothera-
peutic agents [3]. On the other hand, under persistent
autophagic stimulation, uncontrolled autophagy can result
in cell death by digesting essential cytoplasmic compo-
nents in tumor cells [4]. Though there are numerous
reports to substantiate the role of autophagy in both cell
survival and death, autophagy induced in tumor cells in
response to drug-induced stress may not be an essential
cell death regulatory mechanism. The possibility that such
induced autophagy is a ‘bystander’ with no active role in
regulating cell death has been mentioned in recent
reviews on autophagy [5, 6]. Such unpredictable roles of
autophagy in tumor cell death make it an interesting
research topic, particularly when studying autophagy
induced during drug treatment.
Recently, the mechanisms underlying the cell death
inducing effects of the novel semi-synthetic compound
bis(2-phenylethyl)-6,9,10-trihydroxybenzo[kl]xanthene-
1,2-dicarboxylate (or, more shortly, Phenethyl Caffeate
Benzo[kl]xanthene Lignan, PCBL) has reported by us [7].
The structure of PCBL is shown in Fig. 1. PCBL is a
molecule derived by the dimerization of the natural product
Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE, a honeybee propolis
component). It belongs to the group of benzoxanthene
lignans, which are rarely encountered in nature. They have
consequently been studied only recently, once their bio-
mimetic synthesis at a sufficient quantity became practi-
cally successful using Mn-mediated oxidative coupling of
caffeic acid esters [8]. Among different benzoxanthene
lignans obtained through such chemical processes, PCBL is
the most promising antitumor agent because of its DNA
interacting capacity, antiproliferative activities [9], anti-
angiogenic properties [10], and its cell death inducing
effects in tumor cells [7]. In the current study, we have
extended these studies by analyzing the role of autophagy
in PCBL-induced cell death.
Materials and methods
Reagents
3-(4-5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2-5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bro-
mide (MTT), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF),
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), fetal
bovine serum (FBS), B7 supplement, L-glutamine, basic
fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), epidermal growth factor
(EGF), trypan blue, 3-methyladenine (3-MA), bafilomycin
A1, and antibodies for b-actin and LC3 II were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell lysis buffer
for protein extraction, antibodies against Atg5, Atg12,
phospho-p70 S6 kinase, and secondary anti rabbit antibodies
were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc.
(Danvers, MA, USA). Antibodies against p62 and Beclin 1
were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA).
A West Pico Chemiluminiscence Detection kit used for the
development of western blots and a DyLight� 488 conju-
gated secondary antibody for immunoflourescence were
purchased from Pierce Biotechnology Inc. (Rockford, IL,
USA). A Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay kit was purchased from
Promega (Madison, WI, USA). PCBL was prepared through
oxidative coupling of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE)
using Mn(OAc)3 as the oxidative agent, following previ-
ously reported procedures [8].
Cell culture
WiDr colon adenocarcinoma cells were the kind gift of
Professor William R. Wilson, Auckland Cancer Society
Research Centre, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
The cells were grown as monolayer cultures in DMEM,
containing 10 % FBS and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin
and 100 lg/ml streptomycin) in a humidified atmosphere
of 5 % CO2 at 37 �C. Human glioma tissues were obtained
from patients undergoing surgical treatment at Sree Chitra
Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology,
Thiruvanthapuram, India. Informed consent was obtained
from patients as approved by the institutional ethical
committee. The biopsy specimens were transported in
Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS). Tumor tissues were
washed with HBSS and minced to small fragments, which
were then dissociated into single cells with papain treat-
ment. The dissociated tumor cells were washed, resus-
pended and cultured in DMEM: F-12 supplemented with
10 % FBS, B 27 supplement, 2 mM of L-glutamine, 20 ng/ml
of bFGF, 20 ng/ml of EGF, and 100 U/ml of antibiotics
penicillin and streptomycin. The cells were incubated at
37 �C in 5 % CO2 and 95 % air. For all experiments,
DMEM containing 2.5 % FBS was used or the medium is
specified. Glioma cells after first passage were used for
experiments.
Fig. 1 Chemical structure of PCBL
86 Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94
123
Cell viability assay using MTT
Cell viability was measured by MTT assay as described
elsewhere [11]. WiDr cells were plated at a density of
1 9 104 cells per well in 96 well plates and incubated for
24 h. After incubation, WiDr cells were treated with differ-
ent concentrations of PCBL alone or in combination with
bafilomycin A1 or 3-MA. During combination treatments,
10 mM 3-MA or 10 nM bafilomycin A1 were pretreated for
1 h followed by PCBL treatment for 18 h. Following treat-
ment, MTT dissolved in the culture media was added to each
well (final concentration 1 mg/ml) and incubated at 37� C for
2� h. Acidified isopropanol was added to dissolve the MTT
crystals and the optical density was measured at 570 nm
(with 630 nm as reference wavelength) using a microplate
reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).
Western blot analysis
For western blotting, cells were lysed in cell lysis buffer
supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail. Lysates
were separated by 10 or 15 % SDS-PAGE and transferred to
a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with
Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.8) containing 0.5 % Tween 20 and
5 % skim milk to reduce non-specific binding. The blocked
membrane was probed with primary antibody against the
target protein followed by HRP-conjugated secondary anti-
body and the bands were visualized using West Pico
Chemiluminescence Detection Kit as per the instructions of
the manufacturer. The bands obtained were exposed to X-ray
films and documented using an image analysis system (Bio-
Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Immunoflourescence microscopy
For immunocytochemistry, WiDr cells were plated on a 24
well plate (5 9 104 cells per well) and incubated for 24 h.
Following incubation, cells were treated with different
concentrations of PCBL for 8 h and fixed with 4 % para-
formaldehyde for 10 min. The fixed cells were blocked
with PBS containing 3 % Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)
and 0.3 % Triton X-100 (PBST) for 1 h. The cells were
incubated with LC3 II antibody (1:600 dilution) overnight
at 4 �C. After washing, the cells were incubated with Dy-
Light 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:800 dilution)
at room temperature and visualized using a fluorescent
microscope equipped with appropriate excitation and
emission filters (excitation/emission at 490/520 nm).
Acridine orange staining
Autophagic induction is characterized by increased acidic
autophagosomes, which can be detected by acridine orange
staining [12]. WiDr cells were seeded in 60 mm culture
dishes at a 70 % confluence and treated with PCBL
(25 lM) for 8 h. The cells were then rinsed twice with PBS
and incubated with acridine orange at a final concentration
of 1 mg/ml for 5 min. These cells were washed again with
PBS to remove the excess stain and observed under a
fluorescent microscope.
Trypan blue exclusion assay
For assessment of cell death, WiDr Cells were plated on a
24 well plate (5 9 104 cells per well), and incubated for
24 h. The cells were pre-treated with bafilomycin A1
(10 nM) for 1 h followed by co-treatment with or without
25 lM of PCBL for 12 or 24 h. After treatment, cells were
trypsinized and resuspended in PBS. Equal amount of cell
suspension was mixed with 0.4 % trypan blue solution and
incubated for 3 min. Stained (dead) and unstained (viable)
cells were counted in a hemocytometer and a quantitative
measure of viability was expressed as the percentage of
viable cells out of the total cell count.
Caspase assay
Caspase assay was performed using Caspase-Glo 3/7 Assay
kit per the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 3 9 104
glioma cells were seeded into a 96 well plate and incubated
for 24 h and treated with or without 25 lM of PCBL for
12 h. After treatment, 100 ll of caspase reagent from the
kit was added to the cells without removing the medium.
The contents of the wells were gently shaken for 2 h and
the luminescence emitted was measured using a lumino-
meter (Berthold Technologies GmbH & Co. KG, Bad
wildbad, Germany).
Statistical analysis
All statistical calculations were carried out using GraphPad
Prism software. All values are expressed as the
mean ± standard deviation (SD). The differences among
the mean values were analyzed with one-way ANOVA
followed by Tukey’s post hoc t test analysis.
Results
PCBL induces autophagy in WiDr cells
PCBL-treated WiDr cells exhibited vacuolated structures
(Fig. 2a), a morphological feature of autophagy. Autoph-
agy is a process characterized by increased acidic vesicular
organelles (AVOs), which can be detected by acridine
orange, a stain that accumulates in acid vesicles and
Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94 87
123
Fig. 2 PCBL increases the
level of autophagosomes in
WiDr cells. a Vacuolated
structures, probably
autophagosomes, observed in
PCBL-treated WiDr cells were
documented using a phase
contrast microscope. b WiDr
cells treated with or without
PCBL were stained with
acridine orange and observed
under a fluorescence
microscope. Cells treated with
PCBL show acridine orange-
stained acidic vesicles, an
indication of increased levels of
autophagosomes. c WiDr cells
were treated with different
concentrations of PCBL for 8 h,
fixed, and immunostained with
LC3 II antibody. A punctuated
distribution of LC3 II was
observed in PCBL-treated WiDr
cells. This suggests that PCBL
can induce autophagy. (Color
figure online)
88 Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94
123
Fig. 3 PCBL increases autophagic flux. a and b WiDr cells were
treated with PCBL for the indicated time periods and at the indicated
concentrations and were analyzed for LC3 II expression by western
blotting. WiDr cells were treated with PCBL (25 lM) for different
time periods or for 12 h with different concentrations of PCBL.
Results show time- and dose-dependent increase of LC3 II in PCBL-
treated cells c WiDr cells treated with bafilomycin A1 for 4 h were
analyzed for LC3 II expression by western blotting. Bafilomycin A1
blocks fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes and induces
accumulation of LC3 II. Results show that the saturated concentration
needed for blocking autophagosome-lysosome fusion was 10 nM and
higher concentrations did not yield further accumulation of LC3 II.
d The Protein levels were expressed as fold changes over control after
normalising to b-actin. e WiDr cells were treated with bafilomycin
A1, PCBL, or PCBL?bafilomycin A1. f The PCBL treatment was
applied over 8 h and bafilomycin A1 co-treatment was applied only
during the last 4 h of PCBL treatment. Increased expression of LC3 II
was observed in cells co-treated with PCBL and bafilomycin A1
compared to cells treated with PCBL or bafilomycin A1 alone. g The
protein levels were expressed as fold changes over control after
normalising to b-actin. All of the above experiment were repeated
thrice. *** P value \0.001, **P value \0.01, ### P value \0.001.
Symbol asterisk (*) represents statistical significance between control
and treatment groups where as hash (#) represents statistical
significance between different treatment groups). h WiDr cells
treated with bafilomycin A1 for 4 h were analyzed for accumulation
of p62 by western blotting. Bafilomycin A1 treatment increased
accumulation of p62 in WiDr cells. i WiDr cells treated with PCBL
for 8 h and 12 h were analyzed for p62 expression by western
blotting. PCBL treatment decreased the expression of p62 in WiDr
cells
Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94 89
123
fluoresces in bright red. Vital staining of WiDr cells with
acridine orange showed an increase in AVO in the cells
exposed to 25 lM PCBL (Fig. 2b). The capacity of PCBL
to induce autophagy was further examined by analyzing the
intracellular distribution of LC3 II (autophagy marker)
upon PCBL treatment by immunofluorescence. A punctu-
ate distribution pattern of LC3 II, an indication of increased
autophagy, was observed in WiDr cells treated with dif-
ferent concentrations of PCBL (25, 37.5 and 50 lM)
(Fig. 2c).
Autophagic induction in PCBL-treated WiDr cells were
further demonstrated by analyzing LC3 II expression using
western blotting. WiDr cells were treated with a concen-
tration of 25 lM of PCBL for different time periods (4, 8
and 12 h) or for 12 h with different concentrations of
PCBL (25, 37.5 and 50 lM). Our results show time- and
dose-dependent increase of LC3 II in PCBL-treated cells
(Fig. 3a, b). The autophagic flux during PCBL treatment,
which is an accurate indication of autophagic activity, was
also analyzed in this study using bafilomycin A1. Bafilo-
mycin A1 blocks the degradation of autophagosome cargo
in lysosomes, leading to the accumulation of autophago-
some components including LC3 II. Western blot analysis
of bafilomycin-A1-treated cells shows that the effects of
bafilomycin A1 (in terms of LC3 II accumulation and
autophagic inhibition in WiDr cells) saturated at a 10 nM
concentration (Fig. 3c, d), and this concentration was used
for further experiments analyzing autophagic flux. Treat-
ment of PCBL (25 lM) for 4 h followed by its co-treat-
ment with bafilomycin A1 for another 4 h in WiDr cells
shows increased accumulation of LC3-II compared to cells
treated with PCBL or bafilomycin A1 alone (Fig. 3e–g).
Such surplus accumulation of LC3 II induced by PCBL in
the presence of bafilomycin A1 demonstrates enhanced
autophagic flux in PCBL-treated WiDr cells. Furthermore,
we analyzed the expression dynamics of p62 (autophagic
substrate protein) in WiDr cells. Inhibition of autophagy by
bafilomycin A1 resulted in p62 accumulation confirms that
a considerable amount of p62 is degraded via autophagy in
WiDr cells (Fig. 3h). Since p62 degradation is enhanced by
increased autophagic flux, its expression should remain low
in autophagy-induced cells. As expected, PCBL treatment
reduced the expression of p62 in WiDr cells (Fig. 3i).
Taken together, these observations confirm that PCBL
induces autophagy.
PCBL-induced autophagy is class III PI3-kinase
dependent
To obtain information regarding the role of class III PI3-
kinase in PCBL-induced autophagy, we used 3-methylad-
enine (3-MA), which is a known inhibitor of class III PI3-
kinase. When administered in combination with 3-MA,
PCBL failed to induce LC3 II in WiDr cells (Fig. 4a).
Moreover, PCBL-induced autophagy in WiDr cells was
associated with increased expression of Beclin 1, an
autophagy related protein associated with the class III PI3-
kinase complex (Fig. 4b). Both of these results indicate a
positive involvement of class III PI3-kinase in PCBL-
induced autophagy.
PCBL treatment did not alter p70 S6k phosphorylation
To study the role of mTOR signaling in PCBL-induced
autophagy, we analyzed phosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase.
Active mTOR can phosphorylate its substrate p70 S6
kinase at ser 279 and thr 376 positions. Phosphorylation at
these sites, an indication of mTOR activity, was analyzed
by Western blotting. We found unaltered phosphorylation
of p70 S6 kinase at ser 279 or thr 376 in PCBL-treated
WiDr cells (Fig. 5a, b), indicating that PCBL does not alter
mTOR activity. These results further indicate that mTOR
signaling may not play a critical role in regulating PCBL-
induced autophagy.
PCBL treatment did not induce Atg5 and Atg12
expression
Atg5 and Atg12 proteins in their conjugated form (Atg5–
Atg12), having a molecular weight of about 55 kDa, are
required for the recruitment of LC3 II to autophagosomes.
Western blot analysis indicated that PCBL treatment did
not increase the expression of Atg5 or Atg12 (conjugated
form, 55 kDa) in WiDr cells (Fig. 6a, b). This result also
shows that Atg5–Atg12 conjugation did not increase fol-
lowing PCBL treatment.
PCBL induces autophagy and apoptosis in primary
glioma cells
The autophagic and apoptotic effects of PCBL are not cell
line specific. Our finding of decreased pro-caspase 7
Fig. 4 PCBL-induced autophagy is class III PI3-kinase dependent.
a WiDr cells were pre-treated with 3-MA for 1 h and subsequently
exposed to PCBL (25 lM) for 8 h and subjected to western blotting.
PCBL in combination with 3-MA did not induce LC3 II expression in
WiDr cells. b WiDr cells were treated with PCBL for the indicated
time periods and were analyzed for Beclin 1 expression by western
blotting. PCBL-treated WiDr cells showed increased expression of
Beclin 1
90 Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94
123
expression and increased caspase 3/7 activity in glioma
cells treated with PCBL for 12 h demonstrates that PCBL
can induce apoptosis (Fig. 7a, b). PCBL-treated (25 lM)
glioma cells exhibited increased bright red fluorescent
structures when stained with acridine orange (Fig. 7c). This
suggests the presence of increased AVO in PCBL-treated
glioma cells. PCBL-treated glioma cells also showed
increased LC3 II accumulation and decreased p62 expres-
sion (Fig. 7d), a pattern expected in autophagy induced
cells. Taken together, these observations confirm the
capacity of PCBL to induce autophagy along with apop-
tosis in glioma cells.
Cell death induced by PCBL was unaltered
by inhibition of autophagy
The role of autophagy in PCBL-induced cell death was
analyzed by inhibiting autophagy in WiDr cells. Inhibition
of autophagy with bafilomycin A1 and 3-MA did not alter
the viability reduction or cell death induction caused by
PCBL in WiDr cells (Fig. 8a, b). The capacity of PCBL to
induce apoptosis was also not altered by inhibiting
autophagy. The pattern of cleaved PARP expression in
WiDr cells co-treated with bafilomycin A1 and PCBL was
similar to that of WiDr cells treated with PCBL alone
(Fig. 8c). Taken together, these results demonstrate that
PCBL-induced cell death is independent of its capacity to
induce autophagy.
Discussion
We recently reported the effects of PCBL on DNA damage
and apoptosis in tumor cells, specifically WiDr cells [7].
Autophagy has generally been considered a pathway that
has the potential to regulate the course of drug-induced cell
death. Hence, it is appropriate to investigate the capacity of
a novel synthetic compound to induce autophagy while
studying its antitumor properties. Since this investigation
pertains to the role of autophagy in PCBL-induced cell
Fig. 5 PCBL had no effect on p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation. WiDr
cells were treated with PCBL for different time periods and the
phosphorylation of the mTOR substrate p70 S6 kinase was analyzed
by western blotting. There was no decrease in phosphorylation at thr
389 or ser 371 residues of p70 S6 kinase (a and b)
Fig. 6 PCBL treatment did not increase Atg5 and Atg12 expression.
WiDr cells treated with 25 lM PCBL for different time periods were
analyzed for the expression of Atg5 (a) or Atg12 (b). Expression of
Atg5 and Atg12 remain uninduced in PCBL-treated cells
Fig. 7 PCBL induced apoptosis and autophagy in primary glioma
cells. a Glioma cells treated with PCBL for 12 h was analyzed for
pro-caspase 7 by western blotting. PCBL treatment decreased pro-
caspase 7 expression in glioma cells. b Glioma cells treated with
PCBL (25 lM) for 12 h were analyzed for caspase activity using a
caspase-Glo 3/7 assay kit. PCBL-treated cells exhibited increased
luminescence, which was graphically represented as caspase 3/7
activity. c Glioma cells were treated with PCBL for 12 h and stained
with acridine orange. Increased acridine orange staining of intracel-
lular vesicles was observed in PCBL-treated glioma cells. d PCBL-
treated glioma cells were analyzed for the expression of p62 and LC3
II by western blotting. PCBL-treated (25 lM) glioma cells showed
increased LC3 II and decreased p62 expression
Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94 91
123
death, we used PCBL at concentrations and treatment
regimens known to induce cell death in WiDr cells.
During autophagy, autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes
forming autophagolysosomes, and its components, includ-
ing LC3 II, of the autophagosome membrane become
subsequently degraded in the lysosomes [13]. Though
increased acridine orange fluorescence and LC3 II
expression provide evidence of increased autophagosomes
in PCBL-treated cells, these findings cannot be accepted as
definitive evidence of increased autophagy because an
increased levels of autophagosomes or LC3 II in the
cytosol at a particular time can either be because of
increased autophagy or reduced clearance of
autophagosomes (blockage of autophagy) [14]. Hence,
instead of attempting to take a snap shot of autophago-
somes, assaying its increased turnover (autophagic flux)
may be a more reliable indicator of autophagy in response
to a particular treatment [15]. The guidelines provided by
Rubinsztein et al., to analyze autophagic flux in response to
drug treatment were used in our study [16]. An increased
level of LC3 II or autophagosomes when autophagosome
degradation is blocked by bafilomycin A1 reflects the basal
rate of autophagosome formation (autophagy flux) in cells.
The additional accumulation of autophagosomes and LC3
II following treatment with the test compound in the pre-
sence of bafilomycin A1 indicates a true autophagosomal
Fig. 8 Autophagic inhibition fails to alter PCBL-induced cell death.
a WiDr cells were treated with different concentrations of PCBL (0,
12.5, 25, 37.5, or 50 lM) in combination with 3-methyladenine
(5 mM) or bafilomycin A1 (10 nM) for 18 h and analyzed for cell
viability by MTT assay. 3-MA and bafilomycin A1 were applied for
1 h before the addition of PCBL. The antitumor efficacy of PCBL was
not altered in cells treated with bafilomycin A1 or 3-methyladenine.
ns indicates a lack of statistical significance. b WiDr cells were
treated with PCBL (25 lM), bafilomycin A1 (10 nM), or the
combination of both for 12 or 24 h and were analyzed for cell
viability by trypan blue assay. WiDr cells were pre-treated with
bafilomycin A1 for 1 h before the addition of PCBL, when treated in
combination. c WiDr cells treated with 25 lM PCBL and/or 10 nM
bafilomycin A1 for 12 h were analyzed for cleaved PARP levels by
western blotting. Bafilomycin A1 was pre-treated for 1 h before the
addition of PCBL for the inhibition of autophagy. The expression of
cleaved PARP was increased in PCBL-treated cells but was not
further altered because of bafilomycin A1 treatment. ***P value
\0.005, ns non-significant
92 Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94
123
increase because of the influence of the test compound. If a
compound is inducing autophagy, in the presence of ba-
filomycin A1, it should induce a surplus accumulation of
autophagosomes and LC3 II when compared to treatment
with either bafilomycin A1 or the compound alone. We
observed such additional accumulation of PCBL-induced
LC3 II in the presence of bafilomycin A1, suggesting that
PCBL induces autophagy. We also analyzed expression of
p62, another protein marker of autophagy, to provide fur-
ther evidence regarding PCBL-induced autophagy. The
protein p62 serves as a link between LC3 and the cargo
substrates that typically degrade in autophagolysosomes.
During the process of cargo protein targeting, p62 itself
gets degraded in autophagolysosomes, reducing its
expression during increased autophagy [17]. Accumulation
of p62 in bafilomycin-A1-treated cells suggests that a
sufficient amount of p62 was being targeted and degraded
in autophagolysosmes during autophagy in WiDr cells, as
reported in other cell types [18]. Reduced expression of
p62 thus suggests increased protein degradation through
autophagy in PCBL-treated WiDr cells.
Signaling mediated by mTOR and class III PI3-kinase
has been reported to be involved in regulating autophagy.
Signaling by mTOR can provide a gauge of cellular
nutrient stress and can regulate autophagy accordingly.
Autophagy, once activated, can compensate for nutrient
deficits by degrading and recycling cellular components for
energy needs. Under normal nutrient conditions, mTOR
suppresses autophagy by phosphorylating Atg13 and
thereby blocking its interaction with ULK, a process
required for the initiation of autophagy [19, 20]. Signaling
by mTOR is generally considered to be a potent regulator
of autophagy, but drugs that can induce autophagy inde-
pendent of the mTOR pathway has also been reported
frequently [21]. PCBL failed to reduce mTOR activity,
suggesting that autophagy induced by PCBL was not reg-
ulated through the mTOR pathway. It is interesting to note
that drugs that induce autophagy independent of the mTOR
pathway possess therapeutic benefits against neurodegen-
erative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s
disease. Most of these drugs can induce autophagy by
reducing intracellular inositol or inositol 1,4,5-trisphos-
phate levels [22]. Another well established positive regu-
lator of autophagy is class III PI3-kinase, a molecular
complex present in mammals, whose function is to produce
phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate from phosphatidyl group
[19]. Phosphoinositol-3-phosphate formed by the activation
of class III PI3-kinase is supposed to help the assembly of
autophagosomes. Autophagy dependent on class III PI3-
kinase is termed canonical. The need to specify autophagy
as ‘canonical’ arises from reports of the existence of
autophagy that does not require the activity of class III PI3-
kinase for its action [23]. Such forms of autophagy, termed
non canonical, do not depend on Beclin 1 and are insen-
sitive to 3-MA, a class III PI3-kinase inhibitor, as reported
with resveratrol-induced autophagy [24]. Autophagy
induced by PCBL is class III PI3-kinase dependent, as
PCBL-induced autophagy is 3-MA sensitive and associated
with increased expression of Beclin 1. This provides evi-
dence for the canonical nature of PCBL-induced autoph-
agy. Atg5–Atg12 conjugative protein is responsible for the
conjugation between LC3 protein and phosphatidyl etha-
nolamine in autophagosome membranes and thus plays an
important role in the assembly of autophagosomes [19].
The expression of Atg5 and Atg12 proteins in their con-
jugative form in PCBL-treated cells prompted us to agree
with the view of Klionsky et al. [13] that increased Atg5–
Atg12 conjugation is not necessary to induce autophagy.
Our observations of Atg5 and Atg12 expression also sup-
ports the argument cautioning against the use of autophagy
related proteins other than LC3 II and p62 in assaying
autophagy.
Because of the overt tendency to use the term ‘auto-
phagic cell death’ to address the increased autophagy
associated with cell death, recent reviews stressed the need
to demarcate clearly between ‘cell death with autophagy’
and ‘cell death by autophagy’. The term ‘cell death with
autophagy’ is proposed to address a passive form of
autophagy induced in a dying cell with no role in regulating
cell death. Similarly ‘cell death by autophagy’ can be used
as a term to describe cell death where autophagy acts as a
prominent cell death mechanism [5, 6]. Comparisons of
cell death induced by PCBL in normal and autophagy
inhibited WiDr cells suggests that autophagy induced by
PCBL is ‘cell death with autophagy’. Our previous report
demonstrated that apoptosis was the main mode of cell
death induced by PCBL [7]. Given that PCBL induces
autophagy along with apoptosis, ‘apoptosis with autophagy
as a bystander’ is probably the apt terminology for
describing such cell death. Indeed, autophagy is not a
specialized mechanism for cell death. It can even be a pro-
survival pathway. Such pro-survival effects of autophagy
are capable of providing resistance against the cell death
induced by classic chemotherapeutic agents, thereby
reducing their effectiveness. The neutral modes of
autophagy induced in WiDr cells by PCBL also imply that
the activated autophagy mounts no resistance to PCBL-
induced cell death. Considering the perplexing, yet over-
whelming reports about the role of autophagy in cell death
induced by antitumor agents, it is worthwhile to gather
information regarding the role of autophagy in cell death
induced by a novel compound with promising antitumor
potential.
In summary, we demonstrated that PCBL-induced cell
death was associated with canonical, mTOR-independent
autophagy. However, autophagy associated with PCBL has
Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94 93
123
only a bystander role in terms of WiDr cell death. From our
observations, autophagy may not possess a critical death
regulatory role in PCBL-induced cell death. However, this
report, in general perspective, raises concerns against the
canonical dogma that couples autophagy associated with
cell death as a prominent cell death regulator. Moreover,
this is the first work demonstrating autophagy induced by
PCBL.
References
1. Marino G, Lopez-Otin C (2004) Autophagy: molecular mecha-
nisms, physiological functions and relevance in human pathol-
ogy. Cell Mol Life Sci 61(12):1439–1454
2. Kondo Y, Kanzawa T, Sawaya R, Kondo S (2005) The role of
autophagy in cancer development and response to therapy. Nat
Rev Cancer 5(9):726–734
3. Abedin MJ, Wang D, McDonnell MA, Lehmann U, Kelekar A
(2006) Autophagy delays apoptotic death in breast cancer cells
following DNA damage. Cell Death Differ 14(3):500–510
4. Kanzawa T, Kondo Y, Ito H, Kondo S, Germano I (2003)
Induction of autophagic cell death in malignant glioma cells by
arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res 63(9):2103–2108
5. Kroemer G, Levine B (2008) Autophagic cell death: the story of a
misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(12):1004–1010
6. Shen HM, Codogno P (2011) Autophagic cell death: loch Ness
monster or endangered species? Autophagy 7(5):457–465
7. Vijayakurup V, Spatafora C, Daquino C, Tringali C, Srinivas P,
Gopala S (2012) Phenethyl caffeate benzo[kl]xanthene lignan
with DNA interacting properties induces DNA damage and
apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Life Sci 91(25–26):1336–1344
8. Daquino C, Rescifina A, Spatafora C, Tringali C (2009) Biomi-
metic synthesis of natural and ‘‘unnatural’’ lignans by oxidative
coupling of caffeic esters. Euro J Org Chem 36:6289–6300
9. Di Micco S, Mazue F, Daquino C, Spatafora C, Delmas D,
Latruffe N, Tringali C, Riccio R et al (2011) Structural basis for
the potential antitumour activity of DNA-interacting
benzo[kl]xanthene lignans. Org Biomol Chem 9(3):701–710
10. Basini G, Baioni L, Bussolati S, Grasselli F, Daquino C, Spata-
fora C, Tringali C (2010) Antiangiogenic properties of an unusual
benzo[k, l]xanthene lignan derived from CAPE (Caffeic Acid
Phenethyl Ester). Invest New Drugs 30:186–190
11. Suboj P, Babykutty S, Valiyaparambil Gopi DR, Nair RS, Srin-
ivas P, Gopala S (2012) Aloe emodin inhibits colon cancer cell
migration/angiogenesis by downregulating MMP-2/9, RhoB and
VEGF via reduced DNA binding activity of NF-kappaB. Eur J
Pharm Sci 45(5):581–591
12. Chen Y, Azad MB, Gibson SB (2010) Methods for detecting
autophagy and determining autophagy-induced cell death. Can J
Physiol Pharmacol 88(32):285–295
13. Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G,
Askew DS, Baba M, Baehrecke EH et al (2008) Guidelines for
the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in
higher eukaryotes. Autophagy 4(2):151–175
14. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T (2007) How to interpret LC3
immunoblotting. Autophagy 3(6):542–545
15. Barth S, Glick D, Macleod KF (2010) Autophagy: assays and
artifacts. J Pathol 221(2):117–124
16. Rubinsztein DC, Cuervo AM, Ravikumar B, Sarkar S, Korolchuk
V, Kaushik S, Klionsky DJ (2009) In search of an ‘‘autophago-
mometer’’. Autophagy 5(5):1–5
17. Bjorkoy G, Lamark T, Johansen T (2006) p62/SQSTM1: a
missing link between protein aggregates and the autophagy
machinery. Autophagy 2(2):138–139
18. Viiri J, Hyttinen JM, Ryhanen T, Rilla K, Paimela T, Kuusisto E,
Siitonen A, Urtti A et al (2010) p62/sequestosome 1 as a regulator
of proteasome inhibitor-induced autophagy in human retinal
pigment epithelial cells. Mol Vis 16:1399–1414
19. Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ (2005) Autophagy: molecular
machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ 12:1542–1552
20. Jung CH, Ro S-H, Cao J, Otto NM, Kim D-H (2010) mTOR
regulation of autophagy. FEBS Lett 584(7):1287–1295
21. Sarkar S, Davies JE, Huang Z, Tunnacliffe A, Rubinsztein DC
(2007) Trehalose, a novel mTOR-independent autophagy
enhancer, accelerates the clearance of mutant huntingtin and
alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem 282(8):5641–5652
22. Sarkar S, Ravikumar B, Floto RA, Rubinsztein DC (2009) Rap-
amycin and mTOR-independent autophagy inducers ameliorate
toxicity of polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin and related pro-
teinopathies. Cell Death Differ 16(1):46–56
23. Tian S, Lin J, Jun Zhou J, Wang X, Li Y, Ren X, Yu W, Zhong W
et al (2010) Beclin 1-independent autophagy induced by a Bcl-
XL/Bcl-2 targeting compound, Z18. Autophagy 6(8):1032–1041
24. Scarlatti F, Maffei R, Beau I, Codogno P, Ghidoni R (2008) Role
of non-canonical Beclin 1-independent autophagy in cell death
induced by resveratrol in human breast cancer cells. Cell Death
Differ 15(8):1318–1329
94 Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41:85–94
123