Date post: | 07-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alxlopezcan |
View: | 229 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 1/7
Linguistic Society of America
Linguistics and PhilologyAuthor(s): George Melville BollingSource: Language, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Mar., 1929), pp. 27-32Published by: Linguistic Society of AmericaStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/408995 .
Accessed: 02/09/2011 10:20
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Linguistic Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Language.
http://www.jstor.org
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 2/7
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOLOGY
GEORGE MELVILLE BOLLING
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
[Discussion of the terms 'linguistics' and 'philology' as used in American
English.]
To the recently renewed discussion'of the terms 'linguistics'and
'philology'something may perhapsbe added. The problem s not tostake out theoretical claimsto portionsof the fieldof scholarship,2 ut
simplyto recognizecertainactuallyexistingtypes of scholarlyactivityand apply to them labels in such a wayas to minimizethe risk ofmis-
understanding. Three such stimuli seem to me to be present in our
environment,and I shall endeavorto suggestthem withoutwishingtoinsistuponthe desirabilityof the verbaldescriptions mployed.
A. The study of man'sspeech-habits.B. Thestudy of what his speech-habitshave enabled man to accom-
plish,that is the study of civilizationas a whole.3C. The establishmentand interpretationof the texts of such docu-
ments as need that treatment.
To B Sturtevant-Kentdecline to react on the groundthat 'no onescholarcan cover so largea field'. The objection s true but not to the
point. It assumesthat our efforts must be individualisticrather than
cooperative. If the issue wereto be raisedat all, it shouldratherbe :Cana libraryto cover so largea field ever be accumulated? Even then theanswer No' must be given, if we havein minda library hat can answerall possiblequestions. The same,however, s true of A and C as well;and the fact neednot troubleus. Ourstudies areaspirations;hat their
1E. H. Sturtevant and R. G. Kent, 'Linguistic Science and Classical Philo-
logy', Classical Weekly22. 9-13; Holger Pedersen in a review of the publicationsof the Linguistic Society, Litteris 5. 148-59 (1928).
2 For that reason I shall not discuss the 'relationship' between philology and
linguistics.Viewed
concretelyit would mean the
relationshipas it exists in some
individual or group, and that is ever-shifting.
aFor I would go beyond Sturtevant-Kent and say that all, not practically all,civilization is the result of language.
27
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 3/7
28 GEORGE MELVILLE BOLLING
idealsare unattainable s a guaranteeof theirpermanence,ndmay bestbe regardedas a merit. The unwearyingquest of Truth is better than
the possessionof Truthherself.3a What concernsus is the presenceorabsence of an ideal, not its attainability;and a serviceabletest is theexistenceor lack of corresponding rganizations4o aid and coordinateour efforts.
To A corresponds the LINGUISTICOCIETY f AMERICA. Here a
tendencyto subdivisionhashardlyas yet set in. Thisis due of course othe relativeyouth of the science,to the precariousness f its holdin this
country,andnot to any smallnessof the field. The ModernLanguageAssociation, n spiteof its name,belongsunderanotherheading,so that
the real exceptions eemto be AmericanSpeech 1925on) and the Inter-national Journal of American Linguistics (1917 on). The exceptions are,as exceptionsshouldbe, significant:one is an internationalenterprise,and both deal with problemsthat ought to be of peculiarconcerntodwellers n this country.
Correspondingo B wehavethe AmericanCouncilof LearnedSocietiesDevoted to Humanistic Studies. Here consciousnessof unity camelate (1919),and we maynote as symptomaticthe cumbersomeitle ascontrastedwith that of its
counterpartthe AmericanAssociationfor
the Advancementof Science. Thereasonfor this is clear: B comprisesanoverwhelmingmass of material; he workershaveattacked it eclecti-
cally and their eclecticisms are reflected in the earlierorganizations.Even so, the breadthof their interests s the noteworthy hing. Thusthe AmericanPhilologicalAssociation started with an interest in lan-
guage, but long ago this beganto shift 'to the fields of literature and
interpretation, o ancient life in general,and in particular o art and
archaeology'.' If nevertheless,archaeologyseems inadequatelyrepre-
sentedin this organization,t must be remembered hat the Associationhas an interlocking membershipand holds joint meetings with the
Archaeologicalnstituteof America. The latter too is far from imitingits interestsas narrowlyas its namemightsuggest. Witnessthe broad
The sentiment is Lessing's. In homelier form is the English saying:Always to court and never to wedIs the happiest life that ever was led.
I4shall limit myself to this country; and as I am thinking of pure, not applied,science, organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of English,
the American Association of Teachers of Spanish, the American Association ofTeachers of Italian do not come into consideration.
6 F. G. Moore, 'AHistory of the Association', TAPA 50. 14 (1919).
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 4/7
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOLOGY 29
programsof the schools it has founded and fostered: the AmericanSchools of ClassicalStudies at Athens and in Rome, the American
Schoolsof OrientalResearch n Jerusalemand in Bagdad. I may citealso the AmericanOrientalSociety which is now seeking,in unionwiththe Archaeologicalnstituteand the Councilof LearnedSocieties, or thefoundationof a Schoolof Indo-IranianResearch. The broadoutlookoftheseendeavorspreventsputtingthemundereitherA orC;and if weareto finda unitywithin them (andthe fact of theirorganization onstrainsus to seek it), it can be done I think only by regarding hem as eclecti-
cally chosenpartsof B.There seemto be two alternatives. We mightwith LeonardBloom-
field' make 'national culture' rather than human cultureour highestunity. But, while it is true that oureclecticismsoften approximateorfollow linesof nationalcleavage ('national'being nterpretedmost liber-
ally), the organizationsnamedreveal a consciousnessof largerunitiesthat forbidsourstoppingat the boundaries f nationality. So I should
prefer to regardthe study of the culture of any one nation as but a
portionof the study of human culture. The secondalternative wouldbe to divideB into two parts, historyandphilology;but the distinctions
attemptedseem
evanescent,'and it is admitted that
they'are
never,and nevershouldbe absolute,only relative'. I shouldagreeratherwithGercke so wirdam EndeallePhilologieauchGeschichtsforschung,ndalle historischeForschung st im Grundestreng philologischeArbeit'.
To C, whether we consider t as a whole or have regardto possible(nationalistic) subdivision, there is no correspondingorganization.Societiesand periodicalsdevotedto the study of certainlanguagesandliteraturesare not to be classedas such; for, as Pedersen points out,much more than C is included in the study of literature. Work of this
type finds its home in the organizationsmentioned under B, of whichit forms, indeed,the core. Fortunately,however, he activity of C as a
8 LANGUAGE 1. 41 (1925).' Cf. Birt, 'Kritik u. Hermeneutik', MuellersHdb. d. klass. Altertumswiss.1.33.4:
'Der Philologe behandelt das Gewesene, der Historiker das Geschehene'. AlsoMaurice Bloomfield, 'Philology', Johns Hopkins Alumni Mag. (an unfortunatelyout-of-the-way place) 14. 5 (1925): 'History draws this picture in outline that maybe compared to a pen and ink drawing, philology lays on the colors. Historyis engaged with what may be called the more external, pragmatic, secular aspectsof the human
past; philologydeals more with its
inner, spiritual aspects.'The
quotation in the text is from the same page.8 'Methodik', Einl. in d. Altertumswiss. 12. 35. The whole section 'Die Einheit
der philologisch-historischen Methode' will repay close reading.
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 5/7
30 GEORGEMELVILLEBOLLING
stimulusis not in question,since both Sturtevant-Kentand Pedersenreactto it.
We have then the threestimuliA, B,C all present n ourenvironment;the questionis what verbalresponses o themareto be regardedas themost adequate. The answer s conditioned, f course,by ourpast. We
began with a British heritage:that means calling A 'philology',and
respondingo B and Conlywithphrases,9ot withseparatewords. But,when the influence of Germany began to affect our University life, there
came in the continental terminology: 'linguistics' for A, 'philology' for
B, and 'philology' n a restrictedsense (philologyparexcellence) or C.The usage,particularly f 'philology'as a response o B, wasconfined o
certainnarrowcirclesof professed and,I think, chieflyclassical)philo-logians,and was there perfectlyfamiliar. To documentthis wouldbetedious rather than difficult;I may refer to the article by Maurice
Bloomfield,alreadycited, and may quote also Gildersleeve,OscillationsandNutationsofPhilological tudies13: 'I wouldreiterate he confessionof my faith in the formulaeof my youth, my beliefin the widerconcep-tion of philologicalwork, in the necessity of bringingall our specialinvestigationsinto relationwith the whole body of philological ruth,the life of the
world,the life of
humanity.'I
mightalso alludeto the
fact that the AmericanPhilologicalAssociation elt noneed to change tsname with its shift of interests; philological'n its title merelytook oninsteadthe newmeaning. Or,togiveonemoreexample:whenaperiodi-cal 'devoted to research in the Languages,Literatures,History, andLife of ClassicalAntiquity'was founded, ts editorsnamed it Classical
Philology. The use remained, however, esoteric, the mark of a pro-fessional dialect; not even the officialterminology of our Universities was
affected by it. The most surprising thing to me in the whole discussion
is the wayin whichthe fact that 'philology'hasbeenusedasaresponse oB both in continental Europeand in this country, is ignoredboth byPedersenandby Sturtevant-Kent.
The inconveniences attendant upon the habit of calling A 'philology'are familiar and need not be rehearsed; but a recent illustration given byPedersen will bear repetition. The organizers of the 'premier congrbsinternationalde linguistes'wishedto issuetheirfirst circular n English.BritishEnglishofferednothingbut the manifestly mpossible Congressof Philologists',andso the choicewaslimited to French,German,or the
9 The practical difficulty of forming derivatives from such phrases is properlystressed by Pedersen.
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 6/7
LINGUISTICSAND PHILOLOGY 31
good American First InternationalCongressof Linguists',whichwas
actually chosen. As anotherI may addfroma different ourcea story
now going the rounds. A famous British press (it need not here benamed)undertook o publisha translationof Pedersen'sSprogvidenska-ben;but, most regrettably, he undertaking ameto naught. The rockon whichit shattered was the insistenceof the press that A be called
'philology',even whereit was being explained hat it wasnotphilology.Se non fossevero,sarebbebentrovato.
A recent consequencehas been a tendency in this country to insistthat the better responseto A is 'linguistics'. The usage has gainedground rapidly; though, as Pedersenshows, even the contributors o
LANGUAGEhave not followed t withperfectconsistency. The nconsist-ency, however,is only half as great as Pedersenbelieves;for he hadmissedthe finepoints very neatlymadeby Sapir 1.452)andCollitz 2.10)in using philologistnot linguist."1 The usage seems likely to become
established,"1nd we are all agreedthat there is every reason to wishfor that outcome. Pedersen seems to think that we have been over-cautiousin our use, not so much of 'linguistics' tself but of 'linguist'and 'linguistic',especially n the morepopularof ourwritings. He hasthus indicateda way in which we can help on the desiredresult: usagealonecan establishusage. It will help also, I may add, if continental
linguistsin writingEnglishwill (they do not alwaysas yet) avoid thisBriticism.
The rest of the problem s moredifficult. The trouble s not that oneformis servingas a response o twostimuli;such a situation s mostnor-
mal,andof itself need causenoembarrassment. Ratherthe difficulty sthat there seemsto be no prospectof 'philology'as a response o B gain-ing a firmer oothold. Afterfifty yearsthere are no signsof it. Onthe
contraryeven those closest to philology (C) avoid the usage: the Ar-chaeologicalInstitute, for instance,did not nameits schools SchoolsofClassicalor OrientalPhilology, nor have we an AmericanCouncilof
PhilologicalSocieties. One feels at once that there was no likelihoodof such titles beingchosen. Not that therewas riskof philologybeingconfoundedwith linguistics:that contributedno doubt, but the im-
portant factor was that the specializedmeaningof philology (C) was
10 The other passages are Esper, MONOGR.. 5; Espinosa 3. 201.11 Official dialects
change slowly.If that of our Universities comes to
preservea fossilized meaning of 'philology', the fact may be added to our collections ofsimilar curios.
8/3/2019 Philology and Linguistics
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/philology-and-linguistics 7/7
32 GEORGEMELVILLEBOLLING
prominentenoughto render ts use in the broadersense unattractive.
That againis a normal inguisticprocess,and it is what seemslikely to
happen n this case. Pedersen'sattitudemay indicatethat it is takingplace alreadyon the continent;Sturtevantand Kent aremovingin the
samedirection.But then we areleft withouta response o B, and that meansthe risk
of becoming rresponsiveo that stimulus,of losingour broadestoutlook
uponthe purposeof our studies. It is a risknot to be incurredightly,and yet thereseemsto be no alternative; orno substitutefor philologyin this sense seems available. Historyis likewiseover-specializedor
the purpose,Anthropologyoo is preempted;HumanistandHumanities
aretoo richin theirconnotations,and the latter besides s handicapped
by its ending. Perhapssomeone may hit uponthe right term. Until
he does we must steer our courseas best we can between Scylla and
Charybdis.