+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Photogrammetric Control and Mosaicking of Apollo 15 Panoramic … · 2015. 4. 3. · u...

Photogrammetric Control and Mosaicking of Apollo 15 Panoramic … · 2015. 4. 3. · u...

Date post: 29-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
u Photogrammetric Control and Mosaicking of Apollo 15 Panoramic Camera Images Kenneth L. Edmundson 1 , Jeery A. Anderson 1,2 , Brent A. Archinal 1 , Tammy L. Becker 1 , Ara V. Nefian 3 , Mark S. Robinson 4 , Orrin H. Thomas 5 SIGNIFICANCE The ~2-5 m/pixel scale of the PC images approaches that of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC). Aside from a few Lunar Orbiter and Ranger images and images from landers, these are the highest resolution images acquired prior to LROC and therefore offer a unique and invaluable opportunity for the detection of the most subtle changes in the lunar surface over a ~40 year window in time. Digital MC and PC data will be integrated easily with other digital lunar data and can be updated geodetically and cartographically as needed. This work will thus render this image dataset in a readily usable form, enabling a wide variety of scientific and engineering uses, such as planning and undertaking future missions, geologic mapping, geophysical process modeling, slope dependent correction of spectral data, assessment of the formation rate of small impact craters, and as mentioned above, the detection of subtle surface changes. Figure 8 illustrates one example of the continued relevance of the Apollo PC image dataset. SELENE (SELenological and ENgineering Explorer) Terrain Camera images provided a first look at steep- walled lunar pits in 2009 and 2010 [7,8]. One of the pits identified is in the Mare Tranquillitatis region. Subsequently, it has been imaged at various viewing angles by the LROC NAC camera [9]. This same pit appears in numerous Apollo 15 MC images and in four Apollo 15 PC images (AS15-P-9844, 9846, 9849, and 9851). CONTROLLING APOLLO 15 PANORAMIC CAMERA IMAGES This project utilizes the Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS) planetary cartography package developed by the ASC [10]. We will register the Apollo 15 PC images to each other and to the Apollo 15 MC image dataset. Radius values for tie points will come from either the Apollo Zone DTM created by the ARC or, for points falling outside of that region, from the most recent LRO Wide Angle Camera DTM (GLD100 [11]). The MC images and Apollo Zone and GLD100 DTMs are tied to the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) reference frame [12]. The PC images will therefore be tied to this reference frame as well. The position and attitude parameters of the PC images will be refined via the ISIS least-squares bundle adjustment module jigsaw [13]. Finally we will generate a geodetically controlled, orthorectified DIM of the usable Apollo 15 PC images (excluding dark and overexposed images). The PC images will be projected onto either the Apollo Zone or GLD100 DTM. In addition to the DIM, products will include updated NAIF (Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility [14]) format image position and pointing kernels (a priori and updated from control network solutions), a database of MC and PC tie-points and their adjusted 3D coordinates, and any improvements to the publicly available ISIS software. Work is now focused on refining the ISIS PC model and validating a priori Apollo 15 PC support data. Long term plans are to control the entire PC image dataset (including Apollo 16 and 17 images) which we hope to accomplish under a separate proposal. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is funded by the NASA Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research program under contract #NNH14AY48I. REFERENCES [1] Livingston, R.G., et al. (1980) Manual of Photogrammetry, 4 th Ed., ASP, 187-278. [2] Paris, K.N., et al. (2012) LPS XLIII, Abstract #2273. [3] Nefian, A., et al. (2012) LPS XLIII, Abstract #2184. [4] Edmundson, K.L., et al. (2014) LPS XLV, Abstract #1915. [5] Day, D.A. (1998) Mapping the Dark Side of the World, Parts 1&2, Spaceflight, Vols. 40-41, July, August, 1998. [6] McCash, D.K. (1973) Photogramm. Eng., 39(1), 65-72. [7] Haruyama, J., et al. (2009) Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L21206. [8] Haruyama, J., et al. (2010) LPS XLI, Abstract #1285. [9] Robinson, M.S., et al. (2012) Planet. Space Sci., 69, 18-27. [10] Kestay, L., et al. (2014) LPS XLV, Abstract #1686. [11] Scholten, F., et al. (2012) J. Geophys. Res-Planet, 117(E3). [12] Mazarico, E., et al. (2010) JGeod, 84(6). [13] Edmundson, K.L., et al. (2012) ISPRS Annals, I-4, 203-208. [14] Acton, C.H., et al. (1996) Planet. Space Sci., 44(1), 65-70. 1 Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagsta, AZ, USA 86001; 2 Retired; 3 NASA Ames Research Center, Moett Field, CA, USA 94035; 4 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 85287; 5 Cardinal Systems, LLC, Flagler Beach, FL, USA 32136 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center (ASC) is photogrammetrically and geodetically controlling the ~1500 images acquired with the high-resolution Apollo 15 Panoramic Camera (PC). We will accurately determine, for the first time, the locations and geometric properties of these images, producing a digital image mosaic (DIM) covering ~11% of the Moon at a pixel scale of ~2-5 m/pixel (Figure 1). The PC, together with the Metric (or mapping) Camera (MC), and a stellar camera and laser altimeter (to provide support data) formed the integrated photogrammetric mapping systems flown on the last three Apollo missions (15, 16, and 17) [1]. This effort is the most recent in an ongoing collaboration between the ASC, Arizona State University (ASU), and the Intelligent Robotics Group of the NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) to achieve the most complete cartographic development of Apollo mapping system data into versatile digital map products. The NASA Johnson Space Center and ASU recently completed digital scans of the original MC and PC negatives at film-grain resolution and created a digital record of support data (available online at http:// apollo.sese.asu.edu) [2]. The ARC, using the MC nadir digital images, produced a controlled, orthorectified DIM and digital terrain model (DTM) covering ~18% of the Moon at a pixel scale of ~30 m/pixel [3]. The combined processing of nadir and oblique Apollo MC images by the ASC and the ARC is ongoing [4]. SPYING ON THE USSR AND CHINA: THE CLANDESTINE ORIGINS OF THE APOLLO MAPPING SYSTEM From 1959 to 1972 there were 144 satellite launches in the secret reconnaissance program operated by the CIA and the US Air Force known as Corona. Declassified in stages between 1992 and 2002, the primary purpose of the Corona program was surveillance of the former USSR and China. The camera systems onboard these satellites (and the missions themselves) were given a so-called KEYHOLE designation and a number (KH-1, -2, -3, -4, -4a, -4b, -5, and -6) [5]. The KH-4b satellite configuration consisted of nine cameras including two panoramic, four horizon, two stellar, and one index (Figures 2 and 3). The stellar and index cameras formed the Dual Image Stellar Index Camera subsystem from which the Apollo Mapping (or Metric) Camera System was adapted.The KH-3 panoramic camera was adapted for aerial reconnaissance on the Lockheed U-2, A-12, and SR-71 aircraft. The CIA and US Air Force referred to this camera as the “optical bar camera” and the KA-80, respectively. The panoramic cameras on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 were modified versions of the KA-80, manufactured by the Itek Corporation [6]. THE APOLLO PANORAMIC CAMERA The PC (Figure 4) used a moving lens of 610 mm focal length to capture a 114x1140 mm image. Images were acquired simultaneously or interleaved with the MC images. A PC image covers a 339 (across-track) by 22 km “bowtie” shaped area (Figures 5 and 7). During acquisition, the optical system rotated about the spin axis which is parallel to the flight direction. At the same time, the film (exposed through a variable-width slit) wound through the camera in the opposite direction (Figure 4, left top). Stereo convergence was accomplished by pitching the PC alternately 12.5° fore and aft of nadir via the stereo gimbal (Figure 4, left bottom and Figure 6). The optical assembly was tilted continuously during exposure by the stereo gimbal to compensate for the forward motion of the camera, minimizing image blur. Figure 3: Corona KH-4b camera configuration and ground coverage. From [5]. Figure 4: Left top - PC roll frame assembly; Left bottom - gimbal assembly; Right - Apollo Panoramic Camera with cover removed (NASA). Figure 7: Detail and overview (inset) of Apollo 15 panoramic stereo frames AS15-P-9372 and AS15-P-9377 (NASA/JSC/ASU) with corresponding footprints over a portion of Rima Hadley near the Apollo 15 landing site. Panoramic image positions are defined by original Apollo 15 support data. Lunar surface textured with LROC WAC Global Geomorphological Map (http:// wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_rdr_product/WAC_GLOBAL_E000N0000_032P; accessed 2015-03-05; NASA/GSFC/ASU). Original map is in simple cylindrical projection, with pixel scale of ~950 m/pixel. Original panoramic images have a pixel scale of ~2-5 m/pixel. AS15-P-9372 AS15-P-9377 Figure 8: (A) Overview of pit location (8.335°N Latitude, 33.222°E Longitude) in Mare Tranquillitatis region (LROC WAC mosaic) with Apollo 15 PC image AS15-P-9851 footprint. (B) Pit location in a portion of AS15-P-9851. (C) Pit as it appears in LROC NAC image M155016845R (from [8]), note that a large part of the floor is illuminated. (D) Pit in Apollo 15 PC image AS15-P-9844. M155016845R (LROC NAC) (C) AS15-P-9844 (D) (B) AS15-P-9851 Pit Location (A) Sinas Sinas E Mare Tranquillitatis Pit Location Cauchy M Figure 6: 100% stereo overlap is obtained in image pairs separated by five frames (NASA). Figure 5: Relationship between Metric and Panoramic image coverage (NASA). #1350 Figure 1: Apollo 15 panoramic image footprints covering ~11% of the lunar surface. Inset: Apollo Command and Service Module (CSM) with Lunar Mapping Camera System and Panoramic Camera in the Scientific Instrumentation Module (From NASA image AS15-88-11972). Apollo Command and Service Module (CSM) Lunar Mapping Camera System Panoramic Camera Figure 2: Corona KH-4b satellite. Courtesy Smithsonian Air & Space Museum (SI #97-15881; https:/airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/space-race/online/sec400/sec430.htm; accessed 2015-03-05). Forward and Aft-Looking Panoramic Cameras for Stereo Coverage
Transcript
Page 1: Photogrammetric Control and Mosaicking of Apollo 15 Panoramic … · 2015. 4. 3. · u Photogrammetric Control and Mosaicking of Apollo 15 Panoramic Camera Images Kenneth L. Edmundson1,

u

Photogrammetric Control and Mosaicking of Apollo 15 Panoramic Camera Images

Kenneth L. Edmundson1, Jeffery A. Anderson1,2, Brent A. Archinal1, Tammy L. Becker1, Ara V. Nefian3, Mark S. Robinson4, Orrin H. Thomas5

SIGNIFICANCE

The ~2-5 m/pixel scale of the PC images a p p ro a c h e s t h a t o f t h e L u n a r Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC). Aside from a few Lunar Orbiter and Ranger images and images from landers, these are the highest resolution images acquired prior to LROC and therefore offer a unique and invaluable opportunity for the detection of the most subtle changes in the lunar surface over a ~40 year window in time. Digital MC and PC data will be integrated easily with other digital lunar data and can be updated geodetically and cartographically as needed. This work will thus render this image dataset in a readily usable form, enabling a wide variety of scientific and engineering uses, such as planning and undertaking future missions, geologic mapping, geophysical process modeling, slope dependent correction of

spectral data, assessment of the formation rate of small impact craters, and as mentioned above, the detection of subtle surface changes. !Figure 8 illustrates one example of the continued relevance of the Apollo PC image dataset. SELENE (SELenological and ENgineering Explorer) Terrain Camera images provided a first look at steep-walled lunar pits in 2009 and 2010 [7,8]. One of the pits identified is in the Mare Tranquillitatis region. Subsequently, it has been imaged at various viewing angles by the LROC NAC camera [9]. This same pit appears in numerous Apollo 15 MC images and in four Apollo 15 PC images (AS15-P-9844, 9846, 9849, and 9851). !

CONTROLLING APOLLO 15 PANORAMIC CAMERA IMAGES

This project utilizes the Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS) planetary cartography package developed by the ASC [10]. We will register the Apollo 15 PC images to each other and to the Apollo 15 MC image dataset. Radius values for tie points will come from either the Apollo Zone DTM created by the ARC or, for points falling outside of that region, from the most recent LRO Wide Angle Camera DTM (GLD100 [11]). The MC images and Apollo Zone and GLD100 DTMs are tied to the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) reference frame [12]. The PC images will therefore be tied to this reference frame as well. The position and attitude parameters of the PC images will be refined via the ISIS least-squares bundle adjustment module jigsaw [13]. Finally we will generate a geodetically controlled, orthorectified DIM of the usable Apollo 15 PC images (excluding dark and overexposed images). The PC images will be projected onto either the Apollo Zone or GLD100 DTM. In addition to the DIM, products will include updated NAIF (Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility [14]) format image position and pointing kernels (a priori and updated from control network solutions), a database of MC and PC tie-points and their adjusted 3D coordinates, and any improvements to the publicly available ISIS software. Work is now focused on refining the ISIS PC model and validating a priori Apollo 15 PC support data. Long term plans are to control the entire PC image dataset (including Apollo 16 and 17 images) which we hope to accomplish under a separate proposal. !ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work is funded by the NASA Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research program under contract #NNH14AY48I. !REFERENCES

[1] Livingston, R.G., et al. (1980) Manual of Photogrammetry, 4th Ed., ASP, 187-278. [2] Paris, K.N., et al. (2012) LPS XLIII, Abstract #2273. [3] Nefian, A., et al. (2012) LPS XLIII, Abstract #2184. [4] Edmundson, K.L., et al. (2014) LPS XLV, Abstract #1915. [5] Day, D.A. (1998) Mapping the Dark Side of the World, Parts 1&2, Spaceflight, Vols. 40-41, July, August, 1998. [6] McCash, D.K. (1973) Photogramm. Eng., 39(1), 65-72. [7] Haruyama, J., et al. (2009) Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L21206. [8] Haruyama, J., et al. (2010) LPS XLI, Abstract #1285. [9] Robinson, M.S., et al. (2012) Planet. Space Sci., 69, 18-27. [10] Kestay, L., et al. (2014) LPS XLV, Abstract #1686. [11] Scholten, F., et al. (2012) J. Geophys. Res-Planet, 117(E3). [12] Mazarico, E., et al. (2010) JGeod, 84(6). [13] Edmundson, K.L., et al. (2012) ISPRS Annals, I-4, 203-208. [14] Acton, C.H., et al. (1996) Planet. Space Sci., 44(1), 65-70.

1Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ, USA 86001; 2Retired; 3NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA 94035; 4School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 85287; 5Cardinal Systems, LLC, Flagler Beach, FL, USA 32136

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center (ASC) is photogrammetrically and geodetically controlling the ~1500 images acquired with the high-resolution Apollo 15 Panoramic Camera (PC). We will accurately determine, for the first time, the locations and geometric properties of these images, producing a digital image mosaic (DIM) covering ~11% of the Moon at a pixel scale of ~2-5 m/pixel (Figure 1). The PC, together with the Metric (or mapping) Camera (MC), and a stellar camera and laser altimeter (to provide support data) formed the integrated photogrammetric mapping systems flown on the last three Apollo missions (15, 16, and 17) [1]. This effort is the most recent in an ongoing collaboration between the ASC, Arizona State University (ASU), and the Intelligent Robotics Group of the NASA Ames Research Center

(ARC) to achieve the most complete cartographic development of Apollo mapping system data into versatile digital map products. The NASA Johnson Space Center and ASU recently completed digital scans of the original MC and PC negatives at film-grain resolution and created a digital record of support data (available online at http://apollo.sese.asu.edu) [2]. The ARC, using the MC nadir digital images, produced a controlled, orthorectified DIM and digital terrain model (DTM) covering ~18% of the Moon at a pixel scale of ~30 m/pixel [3]. The combined processing of nadir and oblique Apollo MC images by the ASC and the ARC is ongoing [4]. !

SPYING ON THE USSR AND CHINA: THE CLANDESTINE ORIGINS OF THE APOLLO MAPPING SYSTEM

From 1959 to 1972 there were 144 satellite launches in the secret reconnaissance program operated by the CIA and the US Air Force known as Corona. Declassified in stages between 1992 and 2002, the primary purpose of the Corona program was surveillance of the former USSR and China. The camera systems onboard these satellites (and the missions themselves) were given a so-called KEYHOLE designation and a number (KH-1, -2, -3, -4, -4a, -4b, -5, and -6) [5]. !The KH-4b satellite configuration consisted of nine cameras including two panoramic, four horizon, two stellar, and one index (Figures 2 and 3). The stellar and index cameras

formed the Dual Image Stellar Index Camera subsystem from which the Apollo Mapping (or Metric) Camera System was adapted.The KH-3 panoramic camera was adapted for aerial reconnaissance on the Lockheed U-2, A-12, and SR-71 aircraft. The CIA and US Air Force referred to this camera as the “optical bar camera” and the KA-80, respectively. The panoramic cameras on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 were modified versions of the KA-80, manufactured by the Itek Corporation [6].

!

THE APOLLO PANORAMIC CAMERA

The PC (Figure 4) used a moving lens of 610 mm focal length to capture a 114x1140 mm image. Images were acquired simultaneously or interleaved with the MC images. A PC image covers a 339 (across-track) by 22 km “bowtie” shaped area (Figures 5 and 7). During acquisition, the optical system rotated about the spin axis which is parallel to the flight direction. At the same time, the film (exposed through a variable-width slit) wound through the camera in the opposite direction (Figure 4, left top). Stereo convergence was accomplished by pitching the PC alternately 12.5° fore

and aft of nadir via the stereo gimbal (Figure 4, left bottom and Figure 6). The optical assembly was tilted continuously during exposure by the s t e r e o g i m b a l t o compensate for the forward motion of the camera, minimizing image blur. !!

Figure 3: Corona KH-4b camera configuration and ground coverage. From [5].

Figure 4: Left top - PC roll frame assembly; Left bottom - gimbal assembly; Right - Apollo Panoramic Camera with cover removed (NASA).

Figure 7: Detail and overview (inset) of Apollo 15 panoramic stereo frames AS15-P-9372 and AS15-P-9377 (NASA/JSC/ASU) with corresponding footprints over a portion of Rima Hadley near the Apollo 15 landing site. Panoramic image positions are defined by original Apollo 15 support data. Lunar surface textured with LROC WAC Global Geomorphological Map (http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_rdr_product/WAC_GLOBAL_E000N0000_032P; accessed 2015-03-05; NASA/GSFC/ASU). Original map is in simple cylindrical projection, with pixel scale of ~950 m/pixel. Original panoramic images have a pixel scale of ~2-5 m/pixel.

AS15-P-9372AS15-P-9377

Figure 8: (A) Overview of pit location (8.335°N Latitude, 33.222°E Longitude) in Mare Tranquillitatis region (LROC WAC mosaic) with Apollo 15 PC image AS15-P-9851 footprint. (B) Pit location in a portion of AS15-P-9851. (C) Pit as it appears in LROC NAC image M155016845R (from [8]), note that a large part of the floor is illuminated. (D) Pit in Apollo 15 PC image AS15-P-9844.

M155016845R (LROC NAC)

(C)

AS15-P-9844

(D)

(B)

AS15-P-9851

Pit Location

(A)

Sinas

Sinas E

Mare Tranquillitatis Pit Location

Cauchy M

Figure 6: 100% stereo overlap is obtained in image pairs separated by five frames (NASA).

Figure 5: Relationship between Metric and Panoramic image coverage (NASA).

#1350

Figure 1: Apollo 15 panoramic image footprints covering ~11% of the lunar surface. Inset: Apollo Command and Service Module (CSM) with Lunar Mapping Camera System and Panoramic Camera in the Scientific Instrumentation Module (From NASA image AS15-88-11972).

Apollo Command and

Service Module (CSM)

Lunar Mapping

Camera System

Panoramic

Camera

Figure 2: Corona KH-4b satellite. Courtesy Smithsonian Air & Space Museum (SI #97-15881; https:/airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/space-race/online/sec400/sec430.htm; accessed 2015-03-05).

Forward and Aft-Looking Panoramic Cameras for Stereo Coverage

Recommended