Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | imani-short |
View: | 27 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Direct photons1/11
S. Turbide et al., PRL77,024909(2008)
Definition: Photons NOT from hadron decays. Reason why measure direct photons
1. Leave the medium without a strong interaction
2. Generated in every stage of the collision→ Their pT are characterized by their origins.
Direct photons
q
qg
High pT : Initial hard scatterings
1/11
S. Turbide et al., PRL77,024909(2008)
Definition: Photons NOT from hadron decays. Reason why measure direct photons
1. Leave the medium without a strong interaction
2. Generated in every stage of the collision→ Their pT are characterized by their origins.
Direct photons
q
qg
High pT : Initial hard scatterings Mid pT : Jet-Medium interactions
Jet-QGP photons
1/11
S. Turbide et al., PRL77,024909(2008)
Definition: Photons NOT from hadron decays. Reason why measure direct photons
1. Leave the medium without a strong interaction
2. Generated in every stage of the collision→ Their pT are characterized by their origins.
Direct photons
q
qg
High pT : Initial hard scatterings Mid pT : Jet-Medium interactions
Jet-QGP photons
Low pT : Thermal radiations from QGP and Hadron Gas
Thermal photons
1/11
S. Turbide et al., PRL77,024909(2008)
Definition: Photons NOT from hadron decays. Reason why measure direct photons
1. Leave the medium without a strong interaction
2. Generated in every stage of the collision→ Their pT are characterized by their origins.
Direct photons
q
qg
High pT : Initial hard scatterings Mid pT : Jet-Medium interactions
Jet-QGP photons
Low pT : Thermal radiations from QGP and Hadron Gas
Thermal photons
Thermal photons are of keen interest→ Provide key inputs (Tinit & 0) to describe evolution of the created matter
1/11
S. Turbide et al., PRL77,024909(2008)
Definition: Photons NOT from hadron decays. Reason why measure direct photons
1. Leave the medium without a strong interaction
2. Generated in every stage of the collision→ Their pT are characterized by their origins.
Direct photons
q
qg
High pT : Initial hard scatterings Mid pT : Jet-Medium interactions
Jet-QGP photons
Low pT : Thermal radiations from QGP and Hadron Gas
Thermal photons
Hadron decayphotons
Thermal photon measurement is very challenging due to a large background from hadron decays.
Thermal photons are of keen interest→ Provide key inputs (Tinit & 0) to describe evolution of the created matter
1/11
S. Turbide et al., PRL77,024909(2008)
Definition: Photons NOT from hadron decays. Reason why measure direct photons
1. Leave the medium without a strong interaction
2. Generated in every stage of the collision→ Their pT are characterized by their origins.
Measurement methods2/11
Successful direct photon measurement with two different methods at RHIC 1. Statistical subtraction method by EMCal Subtract hadron decay from inclusive
→ Remainder = direct Large uncertainty on hadron decay at
low pT
Suitable for pT>5GeV/c
2. Virtual photon method Measure low mass e+e- from * Selecting e+e- in mee>135MeV
→ Dramatically improvement of S/B ratio for direct *→e+e-
Suitable for pT<5GeV/c
A. Adare et al., PRL104,132301(2010)
Direct fractions
T
hadron
T
NLO
T
NLO
dp
d
dp
d
dp
d
μ = 0.5pT
μ = 1.0pT
μ = 2.0pT
μ = 0.5pT
μ = 1.0pT
μ = 2.0pT
NLO pQCD expectations are calculated as :
p+p & d+Au : Almost consistent with NLO pQCD expectations Cu+Cu & Au+Au : System size dependence is likely to be seen.
3/11
Direct photon spectra
p+p vs d+Au : Consistent → Little nuclear effects p+p vs Au+Au : Significant excess over scaled p+p result in pT<3GeV/c → Exponential fit gives inverse slope of T = 221±19stat±19systMeV (Central).
p+p vs d+Au
p+p vs Au+Au
4/11
A. Adare et al., PRL104,132301(2010)
Tinit & 0
TC from Lattice QCD ~ 170 MeV
TAuAu(fit) ~ 220 MeV
Hydrodynamic models agree with the data within a factor of 2. Uncertainty on Tinit (300-600MeV) is still large.
Depending on thermalization time 0 (0.1-0.6fm/c)→ Need sensitive observable to further constrain Tinit
5/11
A. Adare et al., PRC81,034911(2010)
Elliptic flow: v2
React
ion
plan
e
X
Z
Y
Px
Py Pz
Pressure gradient
6/11
Collective motion from conversion of spatial eccentricity into momentum anisotropy through pressure gradient. Expected v2 varies depending on a production process:
Initial hard scattering → v2=0 Thermal radiation → v2>0
Elliptic flow: v2
React
ion
plan
e
X
Z
Y
Px
Py Pz
Pressure gradient
6/11
Direct photon v2 is sensitive to thermalization time 0.
Early thermalization → Small thermal photon v2
Late thermalization → Large thermal photon v2
→ Possible to further constrain 0
R. Chatterjee & D. K. Srivastava, PRC 79, 021901 (2009)
Hydro after 0
Collective motion from conversion of spatial eccentricity into momentum anisotropy through pressure gradient. Expected v2 varies depending on a production process:
Initial hard scattering → v2=0 Thermal radiation → v2>0
Direct photon v2
7/11
Surprisingly, a large direct photon v2 is observed in pT<3GeV/c
Direct photon v2 →0 indicates prompt photons from initial hard scatterings are dominant in pT>5GeV/c
Au+Au@200 GeVminimum bias
Direct photon v2
preliminary
A. Adare et al., arXiv:1105.4126
8/11
charged0
direct
Centrality:0-20% Centrality:20-40%
Centrality:10-40%
Centrality dependence
Low pT (pT<5GeV/c) Inconclusive centrality dependence due to large errors
High pT (pT>5GeV/c) Consistent between different experiment results→ v2~0 independently of centrality
Comparison with models9/11
Model 1: H. Holopainen et al., arXiv:1104.5371Au+Au@200 GeV0-20%
Some hydrodynamic models predict direct photon v2 as well as pT spectrum.1. Tinit = 580MeV, 0 = 0.17fm/c
Shape is similar to predicted shape, but a magnitude is under-predicted.
Comparison with models9/11
Model 1: H. Holopainen et al., arXiv:1104.5371
2. Tinit = 450-520MeV, 0 = 0.4-0.6fm/c
Model can describe the data for pT>2GeV/c.
Model 2: R. Chatterrjee & D.K. Srivastava, PRC 79, 021901 (2009)
1. Tinit = 580MeV, 0 = 0.17fm/c
Shape is similar to predicted shape, but a magnitude is under-predicted.
Some hydrodynamic models predict direct photon v2 as well as pT spectrum.
Future prospects10/11
1. RHIC energy scan program Low energy Au+Au collision runs have
been done in 2010 & 2011: √sNN = 62.4, 39, 27, 19.6, 11.5, 7.7GeV
Help to search for Critical Point2. Measurement at LHC Direct photon measurement for wide pT range
Statistical subtraction & virtual photon methods Positive indication from single electron measurement at ALICE
Excess at low pT increases towards more central collisions.p+p 40-50% 0-10%
Summary11/11
Direct photons have been successfully measured in low pT region for different collision systems at RHIC.
pT spectrum Enhanced yield is observed in Au+Au→ Exponential fit : T = 221±19stat±19syst MeV for Central collisionsElliptic flow v2
Large v2 at low pT → Tinit = 450-520MeV, 0 = 0.4-0.6fm/c? v2 ~ 0 at high pT → Dominant source : Initial hard scatterings→ More theoretical models are needed to understand the data
Direct photons are still one of “hot” probes Low energy scan at RHIC & measurements at LHC→ Systematic study in wide collision energy
Process dependent factor
qg q
e+
e-
How to measure low pT photons Hard to measure by EMCals due to a finite energy resolution→ Alternative method has been developed : “Virtual photon method”Virtual photon method Basic idea : Any source of can emit *, convert to low mass e+e-
How to identify direct *→e+e- : Relation between and associated *→e+e- emission rates
Direct * : If pT2»mee
2, S(mee)~1 Dalitz decay :
→ Extraction of direct *→e+e- can be made by utilizing mee shape difference between direct * and hadrons.
Determination of direct fractionr : direct /inclusive eedireeceedata mfrmfrmf 1
Hadrons Direct *
A. Adare et al., PRL104,132301(2010)
Determination of direct fractions in 0.1-0.3GeV/c2 for pT>1GeV/c Negligible contribution of 0→e+e-
Satisfy an important assumption of pT2»mee
2 → S(mee)~1 No contribution of +-→e+e-
Enhanced e+e- yield over known hadron contributions is clearly seen due to direct *→e+e-.
Extended fit result can also describe the data well in mee>0.3GeV/c2.
How to obtain direct photon v2
122
2
r
vvrv
hadroninclusivedirect
Statistical subtraction method
preliminary
inclusive photon v2
Au+Au@200 GeVminimum bias
A. Adare et al., arXiv:1105.4126
1. Measure inclusive v2 using EMCals
hadron
inclusive
N
Nr
How to obtain direct photon v2
122
2
r
vvrv
hadroninclusivedirect
Statistical subtraction method
0 v2
preliminary
inclusive photon v2
Au+Au@200 GeVminimum bias
A. Adare et al., arXiv:1105.4126
1. Measure inclusive v2 using EMCals
2. Measure 0 v2, and then evaluate other hadron v2 (, , …) using MC calculation
hadron
inclusive
N
Nr
How to obtain direct photon v2
122
2
r
vvrv
hadroninclusivedirect
Statistical subtraction method
0 v2
preliminary
inclusive photon v2
Au+Au@200 GeVminimum bias
A. Adare et al., arXiv:1105.4126
1. Measure inclusive v2 using EMCals
2. Measure 0 v2, and then evaluate other hadron v2 (, , …) using MC calculation
3. Subtract hadron v2 from inclusive v2 a. pT<5GeV/c : r from virtual
photon methodb. pT>5GeV/c : r from statistical
subtraction method
hadron
inclusive
N
Nr