Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | anthony-finley |
View: | 15 times |
Download: | 0 times |
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 1
Physics developments in ALADIN:towards higher resolution
Neva PristovEnvironmental Agency of Slovenia
Meteorological office
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 2
Content
• Cloudiness
• Orographic forcing
• Radiation
• Microphysics and convectionLuc GerardLuc Gerard
J-F Geleyn, G.J-F Geleyn, G. Hello, N.Hello, N. Pristov, Y.Pristov, Y. Bouteloup, M.Bouteloup, M. DerkovaDerkova
B.B. Carty, F.Carty, F. Bouyssel, R.Bouyssel, R. Brožkova, J-F Geleyn, Brožkova, J-F Geleyn, M.M. Derkova, R.Derkova, R. Mladek, J.Mladek, J. Cedilnik, D.Cedilnik, D. DrvarDrvar
T.T. HaHaiiden, den, A. Kann, H. Seidl, A. Kann, H. Seidl, R.R. BrožkovaBrožkova,, ... ...
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 3
Cloudiness
• Problem Underestimating of low cloudiness Structure of lifted inversions poorly predicted Overestimated diurnal cycle of temperature
• Method Experiments (1-d and 3-d) with different cloudiness
parameterizations Study effects of vertical diffusion parameterization on
inversion
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 4
Low cloudiness sensitivity experiment
horizontal diffusion of temperature - on
horizontal diffusion of temperature - off
Seidl/Kann scheme
Improved stratus forecast, but areal coverage still insufficient
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 5
Cloudiness
Scheme modifications modify the vertical profile of critical relative
humidity - to get medium and high clouds starting to appear at lower relative humidity values.
tuning of the X-R function in Xu-Randall cloudiness scheme
use of the random/maximum overlap for clouds instead of the random overlap
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 6
Cloudiness
Amount of clouds is more realistically distributed
Total cloudinessprevious new
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 7
Orographic forcing
• modification in orography drag parametrization revised dependencies of the drag on the Froude
number a lift orthogonal to the geostrophic wind and not
any more to the real wind
• replacing envelope orography by a mean orography
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 8
Orographic forcing
10km
5km 2.5km 1.25km
Experiments (Experiments (Semi-Academical)) on ALPIA domain
Using new drag/lift scheme• The new scheme is tuned to be resolution independent
• Parameterization is needed for horizontal mesh sizes from ~ 5 km
• The envelope can be suppressed by the new lift scheme
• The thin line between param / no param is not clear
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 9
Orographic forcing
envelope disappearance and drag/lift improvement
+ more realistic flow around the mountain ranges
+ better wind scores at 850 hPa and around
+ less upwind exaggerated precipitations on mountain flanks (unfortunately) without any shift in position,
+ increased compatibility with the theory of sub-grid mountainous forcing,
- too weak 10 m winds near mountains
- decreased foehn effect that was apparently well tuned before,
- slightly negative upper air geopotential scores
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 10
Orographic forcing
Total precipitation
sum 62 days SOP MAP 1999
Analyses
Mean orography, new drag scheme
Difference
Envelope orography, old drag scheme
Difference
• Bias reduced by 25%
• Maxima around moutains peaks decreased
• No improvement in distribution
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 11
Radiation
completely modifies the thermal computations
2 modes:
• 'statistical' - 'basic' call at each time-step;
• 'self-learning' - some chosen time steps are far more expensive to better tune the 'classical' ones used in-between
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 12
Radiation
CTS+EWS+EBL decomposition of the thermal radiative
exchange terms in absence of scattering
CTS
EWS
EBL
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 13
Radiation
Scores with respect to FMR (new ARPEGE)
Geopotential
Better on all domains
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 14
Radiation
Scores with respect to FMR (new ARPEGE)
Temperature
Better for Europe and N20
(except at very top)
Worse for Tropics and S20
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 15
Radiation
• Computation of optical depths using the gazeous RRTM transmission functions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0,00E+00 1,00E-01 2,00E-01 3,00E-01 4,00E-01 5,00E-01
zuueot rrtm
ZUUEOT acraneb
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0.00E+00 2.00E-02 4.00E-02 6.00E-02 8.00E-02 1.00E-01
zdeot rrtm
ZDEOT acraneb
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0,00E+00 2,00E-01 4,00E-01 6,00E-01 8,00E-01 1,00E+00
zeolt rrtm
ZEOLT acraneb
Comparison of fluxes – encouraging results
CTS EWS EBL
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 16
A- 986 hPa
Combined effects of improvements
B- 1000 hPa
Cloudiness, radiation, drag, without envelopeCloudiness, radiation, drag, without envelope+ SLHD
C- 1007 hPa
Storm 14 September 2003 Black Sea
MSL pressure
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 17
Microphysics and convection
An integrated approach
• Microphysics 3 prognostic: vapour, cloud ice, cloud liquid water 2 diagnostic: precipitation liquid and solid Fluxes of water and heat Parametrization of WBF and riming process
• Convective updraught detrains condensates (no precipitation)
• Downdraught
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 18
Microphysics and convection
Comparision of 2 experiments
• Precipitating Water condensing in the updraught is
immediately precipitated to the ground
• Integrated Updraught detrains condensates
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 19
Microphysics and convection
Squall line 14 August 1999 Western Belgium
MSL pressure and precipitation
‘precipitating’ integrated
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 20
Microphysics and convection
Produce less precipitationProduce less precipitationMaximum of precipitation on right placeMaximum of precipitation on right placeSmoother pressure fieldSmoother pressure field
‘precipitating’ integrated
Precipitation continues to increasePrecipitation continues to increase
Squall line 14 August 1999 Western Belgium
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 21
Microphysics and convection
More cloud iceMore cloud ice
integrated‘precipitating’
Vertical cross section – cloud condensates and T
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 22
Microphysics and convection
integrated‘precipitating’
Vertical cross section – updraught vertical velocity
Extended updraught activityExtended updraught activityHigher velocitiesHigher velocities
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 23
Microphysics and convection
Problem
• Not enough precipitation
because of vertical distribution of condensates
Solution
• Detrainment connected with Entrainment by the same cloud at lover level Neighbourhood clouds
October 2004 26th EWGLAM, Oslo Page: 24
Additional effort is needed