UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
UKCCSRC Bristol 23rd October 2014 Monitoring of the deep subsurface: leakage pathways –
understanding and monitoring the mechanics of CO2 storage
Physics of Rocks for CO2 reservoir characterisation and monitoring
Angus Best
Acknowledgements: Ismael Falcon, Laurence North, Jeremy Sothcott & Clive McCann
National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom, [email protected]
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• Physics of rocks • DiSECCS study • Fractured rock/seismic anisotropy
– Pore fluid viscosity – Sw
• New CO2 rig • New acoustic pulse tube
Outline
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• 58 papers • Seismic attenuation /velocity dispersion • Seismic anisotropy • Geomechanics • Microstructural models • Digital rock physics • Elastic properties • Joint elastic-electrical properties • Fluids and carbonates • Reservoir characterisation and monitoring
Physics of Rocks
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• Contrast reservoir styles – Sleipner (sand) – Snøhvit (sandstone) – In Salah (tight sandstone)
DiSECCS Study & Geomechanics • Diagnostic Seismic toolbox for
Efficient Control of CO2 Storage • BGS, NOC, Leeds, Edinburgh,
Manchester • Statoil, BP
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• Scale dependent • Grain alignment • Bedding fabric • Aligned fractures
Images from Armstrong et al. 1994
Transverse Isotropy
Seismic Anisotropy (In Salah example)
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• NOC – lab experiments • BGS – theoretical models
Pore fluid viscosity & anisotropy in fractured rocks
Shear wave splitting (SWS)
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Frequency dependent seismic anisotropy (Chapman Theory)
Wave propagation at 30° to the fracture normal.
Meso-scale fractures
Meso-scale fractures Microcracks
Microcracks
P-waves
S-waves
(Chapman 2003)
• Poro-visco-elastic model • Squirt flow • Attenuation • Velocity dispersion
• Vertically fractured reservoirs
• Multi-component seismics
• Azimuthal VSPs • Fracture
characterisation • Pore fluid detection
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Chapman Model
Chapman (2003), Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 369-379.
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• P- & S-wave velocity and attenuation • Very accurate (± 0.3%, ± 0.1 dB/cm) • 400 – 900 kHz • Effective pressure up to 65 MPa • Rotating S-wave transducer
Ultrasonic pulse-echo system
Best, Sothcott & McCann (2007)
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Synthetic sandstones with aligned cracks
Leach out aluminium disks with acid
Silica-cemented sand blocks
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Rock property Value Grain size 120 μm
Porosity 30 %
Permeability 21 mDarcy
Fracture density 0.0314 ± 0.0059
Ave fracture radius 2.91 ± 0.06 mm
Ave fracture aspect ratio
0.0429 ± 0.0008
Octagonal sandstone samples
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Model predictions Blank sample (no fractures) Anisotropic background Fractured sample
Minimise errors in Thomsen weak anisotropy parameters: epsilon, gamma & delta
SWS = 1.45% CD = 3.14%
Tillotson et al (2014), Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 1238-1252.
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Results - pore fluid viscosity
SWS = 4.59% (1.45% + 3.14%)
Tillotson et al (2014), Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 1238-1252.
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Results – attenuation & Sw Blank Fractured
Amalokwu et al (2014), Geophysical Journal International, 197, 943-947.
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
New CO2 rig (Falcon, North, Best)
• THMC (Thermal-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical)
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
New CO2 rig (Falcon, North, Best)
1
Ultrasonicpulse-echo
Bufferroad-top
Bufferroad-bottom
Electrodes
Sample
σ3
σ1
Lateral strain gage
Axial strain gage
Static moduli vs
Dynamic moduli
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
New CO2 rig (example data)
1
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• Geophysics • Seabed gas quantification • CH4 & CO2 • Hydrates • P-waves 500 Hz – 10 kHz • Frequency-dependence • Samples 7 cm diameter,
50 cm long • 60 MPa fluid/confining • 4 to 100 degC • S-waves ~ 1 kHz • ERT • Sands, muds
Greenhouse Gas Pulse Tube Sat. 5th July 2014
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Greenhouse Gas Pulse Tube
a) b)
c) d)
McCann et al (2014), Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 97-116.
1 – 10 kHz
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
Acoustic Bubble Resonance Anderson & Hampton (1980a, b)
Recent theoretical developments: Leighton (2007)
Kuhs et al (2004)
Velocity
Attenuation
Bubble size distributions
UKCCSRC Bristol, 23 October 2014
• Need controlled lab studies to understand: – Seismic anisotropy in fractured porous rocks – Pore fluid viscosity effects – Gas saturation effects – Geomechanical response to CO2 injection – Validate theoretical models for application to reservoir
characterisation & monitoring
• Acoustic pulse tube studies – Seabed greenhouse gas quantification – Gas bubble resonance phenomena
Conclusions