+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal...

PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal...

Date post: 16-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: logan-samson-hunt
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
68
PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs
Transcript
Page 1: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

PIA 2000Introduction to Public Affairs

Page 2: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison

2. Ideal Types

3. The Rationality Debate

4. Governance Processes

5. Dysfunctional Governance

6. Reform vs. Rhetoric

Page 3: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 4: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 5: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. The Rational Model

2. Authoritarian

3. Mobilizing Regime- Party Dominant

4. Fused- Cabinet Government

5. Separation of Powers- “Congressional”

6. Federal vs. Unitary

7. Territorial (Cantonal) vs. Corporate

8. Corruption and the Problem of Efficiency

Page 6: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1916-2006

Ferrel Heady Died August 16, 2006

Page 7: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Not reality: eg. Model Airplane

2. A kind of Model

3. Deviations can be measured

4. Method: By comparison to the model

Page 8: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 9: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

An Ideal Type Matrix

Page 10: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Organization highly differentiated

2. Rational decisions and procedures

3. High activity levels and efficiency

4. Power and authority are legitimate

5. Popular involvement and acceptance of procedures and decisions

Page 11: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

“What is wrong with this Picture?”

Page 12: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

a. Merit Selection

b. Hierarchy- Chain of Command

c. Division of Labor and functional specialization

d. Administrative work: full time, no sinecures

e. Contractual agreement

f. Professional or technical training

Page 13: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 14: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1.Scientific Management: Time and Motion- (Taylor)

1.Human Resource Management: Social Comfort-Hawthorne Experiments

Page 15: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 16: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1936

Modern Times

Page 17: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Hawthorne Study: he Hawthorne effect - an increase in worker productivity produced by the psychological stimulus of being singled out and made to feel important and improved work.

“The Hawthorn Effect” The term was coined in 1955 by Henry A. Landsberger when analysing older experiments from 1924-1932 at the Hawthorne Works (a Western Electric factory outside Chicago).

Page 18: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 19: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

“Very Impressive, my colleague....but does it also work in theory”

Page 20: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 22: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 23: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Bureaucracy as Authoritarian

a. Subject****

b. Citizen

c. Customer

Page 24: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 25: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 26: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 27: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

“Red vs. Expert”

Page 28: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Pluralist Systems- Interest Group with experts Have Access Issues

2. Dominant Party Regimes- defacto of de jure“no party states”

1. Mobilization Regimes: Populist vs. Leninist

2. Totalitarian Regimes: Fascist vs. Communist

Page 29: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 30: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 31: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

“Social mobilization is the process of mobilizing all societal and personal influences with the aim of prompting individual, family, group or societal level action”

Page 32: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Traditional

2. Personalist/Charismatic

3. Unstable Pendulum Regimes

4. Administrative States/Organizational Bourgeoisie

5. Military Regimes

6. Mobilizing Regimes

Page 33: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 34: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Review of Distinctions

Page 35: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 36: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 37: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 38: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Marble Cake Layer Cake

Page 39: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 40: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Geographical- UnityCorporate- Democratic or Authoritarian

Page 41: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Ten Minutes

Page 42: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 43: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 44: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

May 17, 2009 ... The accusations of corruption “hurts Pittsburgh,” said Mr. Ravenstahl, who has focused most of his attention on Mr. Dowd's attacks.

Impairment of integrity, virtue, or moral principle

In broad terms, political corruption is the misuse of public office for private gain.

Page 45: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Dysfunctionalism- The “Yes Minister” TV Series and Franz Kafka

2. Corruption and Culture-Robert Klitgaard (Claremont Graduate University)

3. Bashing Bureaucrats: Bob Miewald (University of Nebraska) and (Michael Barzeley, London School of Economics)

Page 47: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 48: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

The Bureaucracy as Controlling

a. The Perfect Library- No books checked out

b. Tied up in Red Tape- The red ribbon which ties up files in U.K.

c. Standard Operating Procedures

Page 49: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

George Wallace”

“They are all burro crats”

Page 50: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 51: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Debates

Page 52: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Civil Service Reform: Exchequer

Administrative Reform- includes Parastatals

Structural Reforms- Organizational Focus

Policy Reforms- Focus on state functions

Organizational and Motivational Reforms

Page 53: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Shortage of Skilled Professionals

2. Structures Imported and “imitative” of classical European Structures

3. Personalization of public sector actions

4. Formalism rather than realism

5. Lack of Operational opportunity

Page 54: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 55: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 56: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. Detailed monthly budget approvals

2. Centrally-driven strategic planning

3. Powerful staff members with no line responsibility

4. Many-layered approval procedures

5. Many-layered, strictly observed payment bands

6. Rigid status symbols

7. Hefty corporate manuals and "bibles"

Page 57: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

1. “Sala” and the Iron Triangle”

2. Satisficing, incrementalism and budget reform

3. Oversight Failure: Press, Civil Society and Legislature (Transparency)

4. Public goods Failures- Explains Corruption

5. Rent Seeking

6. Free Rider Problems

7. Bureaucratic pathologies Video

Page 58: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 59: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

A Multi-functional Room

Page 60: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Is Corruption Contextual?

Page 61: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 62: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Nicholas Lemann, The Great Black Migration

George Orwell, Shooting the Elephant

Huey P. Long and “All the King’s Men”

Jim Mayfield, Go to the People

Page 63: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

New Book: Isabel Wilkerson The Warmth of Other Suns, her massive and masterly account of the Great Migration.

Page 64: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 65: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Orwell last row, third from the left Alice Huie and James

Yen

Page 66: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.
Page 67: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

Robert Penn Warren Huey P. Long

Louisiana or Italy? Is He Willy Stark?

Page 68: PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs. 1. Comparison by Structure- Unit for comparison 2. Ideal Types 3. The Rationality Debate 4. Governance Processes.

V. S. Naipaul, In a Free State

Robert Penn Warren, All the King’s Men

Daniel Okrent, Last Call

C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite

James Lemman, The Black Migration


Recommended