Parliamentary Research Digest M A Y , 2 0 1 6 V O L U M E 3 , I S S U E 0 5
I N SI DE THI S
I SSU E:
CONCEPT
Economic
Indicators-Facts
and Figures of
Pakistan
Page 17
Editorial Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services (PIPS) takes pride in the fact that it commenced the tradi-tion of setting up a Budget Desk in 2012, whereby the Institute provides research and capacity building in pre, during and post budget stages. This year the tradition was only strengthened as the Institute held earlier this year PSDP orientations in National Parliament and provincial assemblies as well as sharing of anticipated paper and a module reader on Budget and Committee work with Committee Chairs of Na-tional Parliament. PIPS legislation wing held a pre-budget public hearing for Senate Finance Committee while on May 26th, Economy and Budget Desk in Research wing held an absorbing Pre Budget Seminar. The recommendations of these events are also shared in this Issue of the Digest. This issue of PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest Comprises articles related to Budget documents and analysis in addition to absorbing write ups on related themes. It is matter of great satisfaction of Parlia-ment of Pakistan, PIPS BoG and its team that 7th Secretary General of Commonwealth Parliamentary Association Mr Akbar Khan visited the Institute on May 6th, 2016 and expressed that “he is delighted to see the excellent work PIPS is doing to strengthen Parliamentary democracy and good governance in Pakistan.” PIPS team also warmly welcomed its new Executive Director and well- known figure of country’s civil society Mr Zafarullah Khan, on May 20th, 2016. (detailed reports within Research Digest) We are confident that the digest would assist honorable MPs to develop insights regarding the issues at hand and help them seek solutions and make informed decisions. For any specific areas of importance that you want PIPS to send you research or briefing papers, don’t hesitate to contact us at [email protected]. Happy Reading and a blissful Ramadan for all of us, ameen!
Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka
Director (Research and I.T)
CONCEPT
Expenditure side
of the Budget
Page 01
Secretary General
CPA recognizes
PIPS Excellent
Work
Page 09
PIPS Team
Welcomes its new
Team Leader
Page 11
PIPS Pre-Budget
Seminar
Budget Proposals
Page 13
ISSN# 2414-8040
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 1
CONCEPT
Expenditure Side of the Budget
Mr. Haider Abbas
Additional Director Finance, PIPS and Member PIPS Budget Desk
The estimated expenditure is the one of the two dimensions of Annual Budget Statement. There are
various concepts and categories of expenditure i.e. Charged and Voted Expenditure, Current and
Development Expenditure, Expenditure on Revenue Account, Expenditure on Capital Account,
Capital Expenditure and Public Account Expenditure. This paper aims to briefly describe these
terms along with analysis of budgetary allocations to meet the said expenditures in multiple angles so
that the reader may comprehend the budgetary jargons, understand and analyze the expenditure side
of the budget.
CHARGED AND VOTED EXPENDITURE:
Article 80(2) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan stipulates that the Annual Budget
Statement (ABS), a Constitutional document under Article 80(1), shall show separately-
(a) the sums required to meet expenditure described by the Constitution as expenditure
charged upon the Federal Consolidated Fund; and
(b) the sums required to meet other expenditure proposed to be made from the Federal
Consolidated Fund; and shall distinguish expenditure on revenue account from other
expenditure.
The above mentioned expenditures are commonly referred to as Charged Expenditure and Voted
Expenditure respectively. The Charged Expenditure under Article 82 is submitted in the National
Assembly for discussion and does not require vote of the National Assembly whereas for the other
expenditure (voted), submitted in the form of demands for grants, the Assembly has the power to
assent to, or to refuse to assent to, any demand, or to assent to any demand subject to a reduction of
the amount specified therein. The Article 81 of the Constitution specifies following expenditure as
charged upon Federal Consolidated Fund (FCF):
(a) the remuneration payable to the President and other expenditure relating to his office, and
the remuneration payable to-
i. the Judges of the Supreme Court [and the Islamabad High Court];
ii. the Chief Election Commissioner;
iii. the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman;
iv. the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly;
v. the Auditor-General;
(b) the administrative expenses, including the remuneration payable to officers and servants, of
the Supreme Court, the Islamabad High Court, the department of the Auditor-General, the
Office of the Chief Election Commissioner and of the Election Commission and the
Secretariats of the Senate and the National Assembly;
(c) all debt charges for which the Federal Government is liable, including interest, sinking fund
charges, the repayment or amortization of capital, and other expenditure in connection
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 2
with the raising of loans, and the service and redemption of debt on the security of the
Federal Consolidated Fund;
(d) any sums required to satisfy any judgment, decree or award against Pakistan by any court or
tribunal; and
(e) any other sums declared by the Constitution or by Act of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) to be
so charged.
CURRENT AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE:
The expenditure on goods and services consumed within the current financial year is called current
expenditure and this is recurring in nature. The administrative cost of the government in terms of
pay and allowance, utility bills, rent & rates, telecommunication expenses, repair & maintenance etc.
fall under this category. The Development Expenditures refer to those expenditures which are
proposed to be incurred on various development projects i.e. construction of new schools, hospitals,
roads, bridges, dams etc. The current as well as development expenditure are met both from
Revenue Account and the Capital Account. Revenue Account refers to the part of Federal
Consolidated Fund (FCF) showing revenue receipts (tax & non-tax revenue) whereas the Capital
Account consisting of recoveries of loans and advances, debt and Loans receipts.
CAPITAL AND PUBLIC ACCOUNT EXPENITURE:
Capital Expenditure refers to payment to be made against long-term debt i.e. Pakistan Investment
Bond (PIB), Foreign Exchange Bearer Certificates, Prize Bonds, and Treasury Bills etc. Public
Account Expenditure, on the other hand, consisting of payment to be made against various savings
schemes, pensionary benefits, provident fund, benevolent fund and group insurance fund of Federal
Government Employees etc.
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS:
The budgetary allocations presented in Table-1 shows function classification wise summary of
current and development expenditure for the Financial Years 2013-14 to 2015-16 along with 5 years‟
(FY 2011-12 to FY 2015-16) average to be used for commentary purposes. Whereas the Table-2
shows the object classification wise summary of the current expenditure.
Table 1: EXPENDITURE SUMMARY : FY 2013-14 to FY 2015-16
Rs. in million
Functi
on
Code
Description 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Average
Expenditure
(FY 2011-12 to 15-
16)
Amount %age
01 General Public Services 2,364,879 2,530,386 2,446,604 2,276,750 56.47
%
02 Defence Affairs & Services 629,752 720,002 781,162 642,292 15.93
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 3
%
03 Public Order & Safety
Affairs
77,039 87,597 94,899 78,680 1.95%
04 Economic Affairs 42,988 55,264 60,195 56,086 1.39%
05 Environment Protection 899 936 1,055 845 0.02%
06 Housing and Community
Amenities
1,558 2,012 2,256 1,865 0.05%
07 Health 9,437 10,124 11,010 9,023 0.22%
08 Recreation, Culture and
Religion
6,633 7,242 7,637 6,703 0.17%
09 Education Affairs and
Services
63,442 64,519 75,580 60,225 1.49%
10 Social Protection 1,959 2,709 1,840 7,646 0.19%
a. Current Expenditure on Revenue
Account
3,198,586 3,480,791 3,482,238 3,140,116 77.89
%
b. Current Expenditure on Capital
Account
205,216 77,536 133,035 165,307 4.10%
1. Total Current Expenditure 3,403,802 3,558,327 3,615,273 3,305,423 81.99
%
c. Dev. Expenditure on Revenue
Account
488,726 378,863 505,976 393,153 9.75%
i. Dev. Exp. on Revenue
Account (PSDP)
208,253 248,295 343,876 235,954 5.85%
ii. Other Dev. Exp. on
Revenue Account
280,473 130,568 162,100 157,199 3.90%
d. Development Expenditure on
Capital Account
369,982 375,459 463,063 333,086 8.26%
i. Dev. Exp on Capital
Account (PSDP)
361,099 373,735 460,763 327,246 8.12%
ii. Other Dev. Exp. on
Capital Account
8,883 1,724 2,300 5,840 0.14%
Total PSDP (ci+di) 569,352 622,030 804,639 563,200 13.97
%
2.Total Development Expenditure 858,708 754,322 969,039 726,239 18.01
%
Total Expenditure (1+2) 4,262,510 4,312,649 4,584,312 4,031,662 100 %
Source: Annual Budget Statements for FY 2011-12 to FY 2015-16
* 5 years' average (FY 2011-12 to FY 2015-16)
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 4
From the table above, it is evident that the around 80% of the Federal Budget caters for the current
expenditure i.e. the administrative cost of the government. After meeting the current expenditure,
the kitty is left with a small portion to be allocated for the development projects. The development
allocation is the main tool to bring structural changes in socio-economic life of the country men.
Greater the development budget, bigger would be the number of projects. The share of current and
development expenditure in the national budget is given in the following pie-chart.
Current Vs Development Expenditure
A: ALLOCATIONS TO MEET CURRENT EXPENDITURE
As mentioned above, current expenditures are incurred to run the administrative affairs of the
government. These include payment of interest and principal amount borrowed by the government,
salaries and pension, various operating expenditure, purchase of assets, repair and maintenance etc.
These expenditures are spent by various ministries, divisions, departments, Public Sector Enterprises
and autonomous bodies. There are multiple angles to view and analyze current expenditure. The
generic presentation of summarized current expenditure as given in the table 1 show that among ten
(10) functions of current expenditure, around 93% goes to two (2) functions namely (i) General
Public Services, and (ii) Defence Affairs & Services.
3,305,423 82%
726,239 18%
Total Current Expenditure
Total Development Expenditure
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 5
The expenditure of Rs.2446.6 billion (FY 2015-16) under General Public Services include Rs.1,596.3
billion against debt servicing (foreign and local) which is 65% of total expenditure under General
Public Services and 44.15 % of total current expenditure. Summaries of Expenditure under General
Public Service Expenditure and Defence Affairs & Services are given in Table-4 and Table-5 as
follows:
Table-1.1: GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
Rs. in Million
Classification Revised
Estimates
2014-15
Budget
Estimates
2015-16
PC of
Total
2015-
16
Executive & Legislative Organs, Financial,
Fiscal Affairs & External Affairs
2,071,824
2,003,903
81.91
%
Superannuation Allowances & Pensions
219,958
231,000 9.44%
Servicing of Foreign Debt
100,492
111,219 4.55%
Foreign Loans Repayment
295,586
316,373
12.93
%
Servicing of Domestic Debt
1,169,545 1,168,676
47.77
%
Others
286,243
176,635 7.22%
Foreign Economic Aid
1,328
100 0.00%
Transfers
418,665
409,875
16.75
%
General Services 0.26%
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
General Public Services
Defence Affairs & Services
Public Order & Safety Affairs
Economic Affairs
Environment Protection
Housing and Community Amenities
Health
Recreation, Culture and Religion
Education Affairs and Services
Social Protection
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 6
6,147 6,415
Basic Research
3,041
3,559 0.15%
Research and Development General Public
Services
9,670
10,683 0.44%
Administration of General Public Services
General Public Services not elsewhere
2,450
2,150 0.09%
defined
17,260
9,920 0.41%
GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
2,530,385
2,446,605 100 %
Table-1.2: DEFENCE AFFAIRS & SERVICES
Rs. in Million
Classification
RE
2014-15
BE
2015-16
PC of
BE
2015-16
DEFENCE AFFAIRS AND SERVICES 720,002 781,163 100.00%
- Defence Administration 2,131 2,022 0.26%
- Defence Services 717,871 779,141 99.74%
- Employees Related Expenses 300,766 326,048 41.74%
- Operating Expenses 180,515 200,625 25.68%
- Physical Assets 163,588 169,648 21.72%
- Civil Works 74,743 84,680 10.84%
- Less Recoveries (1,741)
(1,860) -0.24%
Table-2: OBJECT CLASSIFICATION WISE SUMMARY OF CURRENT
EXPENDITURE
Rs. in Million
Object
Code
Description Budget
Estimates
2014-15
Revised
Estimates
2014-15
Budget
Estimates
2015-16
PC of
BE
2015-16
A01 Total Employees Related
Expenses 504,092 510,941 556,957 4.27%
A011 Pay 86,600 85,162 91,564 0.70%
A011-1 Pay of Officers 23,305 22,963 25,653 0.20%
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 7
A011-2 Pay of Other Staff 63,295 62,199 65,912 0.51%
A012 Allowances 417,492 425,779 465,393 3.57%
A012-1 Regular Allowances 408,390 416,494 455,197 3.49%
A012-2 Other Allowances (Excluding
TA) 9,102 9,286 10,196 0.08%
A02 Project Pre-investment
Analysis 144 286.00 107.00 0.00%
A03 Operating Expenses 561,353 521,979 652,595 5.01%
A04 Employees Retirement
Benefits 234,881 240,764 252,891 1.94%
A05 Grants, Subsidies & Write off
Loans 802,565 865,019 752,904 5.78%
A06 Transfers 7,940 14,846 5,928 0.05%
A07 Interest Payment 1,326,178 1,270,979 1,280,245 9.83%
A08 Loans and Advances 343,164 344,672 400,757 3.08%
A09 Physical Assets 163,800 176,320 180,141 1.38%
A10 Principal Repayments of
loans 14,593,104 9,162,389 8,764,035 67.26%
A11 Investments 44,747 44,483 53,573 0.41%
A12 Civil Works 88,733 94,643 115,718 0.89%
A13 Repairs and Maintenance 12,029 14,132 13,850 0.11%
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 18,682,730 13,261,453 13,029,701 100.00%
B: ALLOCATIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE
The Development Expenditure which includes Public Sector Development Program (PSDP) is
the main instrument available with the government to achieve macroeconomic and development
objectives and eventually to bring improvement in the socio-economic conditions of the
people. The budgetary allocation under development expenditure are made for construction
of schools, hospitals, roads, bridges, dams etc. so as to yield maximum benefits in the shortest
possible time for the society. Salient Features of Development Expenditure for the FY 2015 -
16 are as follows:
Total size of national PSDP of Rs.1513.7 billion allocated for the FY 2015-16, showing an
increase of 27.4% as against the revised estimates 2014-15, includes Federal PSDP of Rs
700 billion and provincial PSDP of Rs.813.7 billion.
Under Federal PSDP, the share of Federal Ministries / Divisions is Rs 252.6 billion
indicating a decline of 16.9% over revised estimates 2014-15. Whereas that of the
Corporations was Rs 271.9 billion indicating an increase of 71.3% over revised estimates
2014-15.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 8
An amount of Rs 20 billion was allocated to Millennium Development Goals and
Community Development Programme. Whereas an amount of Rs 28.5 billion was
provided for Special Federal Development Programme.
Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Authority (ERRA) ha s been allocated Rs 7
billion, which is higher by 40% than revised estimates 2014-15.
An amount of Rs 100 billion was budgeted for Special Development Programme for
Temporarily Displaced Persons (TDPs) and Security Enhancement. Whereas Prime
Minister's Youth Programme was projected at Rs 20 billion, showing an increase of 185.7%
over revised estimates 2014-15.
Further project wise detail may be seen in the budget book titled “Federal Budget Details of
Demands for Grants and Appropriations 2015-16 Development Expenditure” available at website
of Ministry of Finance.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 9
Secretary General Commonwealth Parliamentary Association Recognizes
PIPS’ Excellent Work to Support Parliamentary Tradition in Pakistan
(May 6th, 2016 – Islamabad PIPS) - The 7th
(CPA) Commonwealth Parliamentarians
Association Secretary-General His Excellency
Mr. Akbar Khan visited (PIPS) the Pakistan
Institute for Parliamentary Services in relation
with the Parliamentary Staff Development
Workshop for the Asia/ South- East Asia
Regions being held at PIPS Campus Islamabad.
During his visit he held a meeting with the
Acting Executive Director PIPS Mr.
Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka and other
staff members to discuss issues of mutual
cooperation and interest. The Executive
Director apprised the General Secretary about
the working of Institute and new initiative being
taken by PIPS to support the Parliamentarians
and Parliamentary Functionaries in performance
of their duties.
Mr. Akbar Khan appreciated the good work done by PIPS with reference to the broader scope it has
and desired that a longer relationship may be established between CPA and PIPS for mutual benefit.
He specifically emphasized the availability of the CPA forum to circulate the PIPS relevant courses
to get the nominations from the Common Wealth Parliaments for their Parliamentarians and the
Parliamentary staff. The Executive Director PIPS informed him that PIPS is now member of
Parliamentary Research Centres of 12 countries of Middle East, Asia and North Africa and it is
already providing guidance to Sri Lankan Parliament to set up their PRC. Mr Zaka also suggested to
sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between both the esteemed organizations to
systematically identify the areas of mutual cooperation including but not limited to provision of
offering PIPS courses to CPA member parliaments and their provinces on rules of procedures,
committee system, parliamentary research and development; the Secretary General endorsed the
idea.
Mr. Akbar Khan further highlighted the need for PIPS to engage with the regional Parliaments in
more robust way and offered his help to kick start the process from the Maldivian Parliament. The
Executive Director assured the Secretary General CPA of all out support of his Institute in this
regard. Secretary General CPA also wrote in the visitor‟s book and expressed his delight to see the
excellent work being done by Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services (PIPS) to strengthen
good governance and democracy in Pakistan. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the
Honourable Guest and presentation of a set of PIPS publications to Secretary General Mr. Akbar
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 10
Khan by the PIPS Acting Executive Director Mr Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka. Ms Samer
Awais, Director Training PIPS and Mr Arshad Jan Pathan, Joint Secretary, Senate was also present
on the occasion.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 11
PIPS Team Warmly Welcomes its New Team Leader
Mr. Zafarullah Khan joined as the Executive
Director of Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary
Services on Friday, May 20th, 2016. He
possesses a rich experience spread over three
decades in the fields of journalism,
parliamentary democracy, civic education,
Constitutionalism, and human rights. The
PIPS‟ pioneering Director Research and IT Mr
Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka, Director
Training Ms Samer Awais and senior officers
received the Executive Director and presented
him flower bouquet. Later in the day the
Executive Director met with all officials of the
Institute and also attended the welcome lunch
hosted in his honours. Speaking at the
occasion, Mr Zaka warmly welcomed the new
Executive Director and reiterated PIPS‟ team full support to him in consolidating the Institute as a
quality-oriented non-partisan parliamentary seat of learning. Mr Zafarullah Khan thanked the team
for kind words of appreciation and welcome and expressed his hope that with hard work and team
efforts, Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services will reach to new horizons of excellence in its
mission to support informed-decision making by the Members of Parliament.
Mr Zafarullah Khan has a diverse professional background and served as Executive Director, Centre
for Civic Education, Pakistan, (2004-2016); Correspondent Pakistan, Civil Society Yearbook
prepared by the Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics (2000-2006); Lead trainer
Political Party Development Program, National Democratic Institute (NDI) (2004-2009);
Moderator, International Academy for Leadership, Germany (October 2004- 2006) and Project
Coordinator, Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung Pakistan (2000-2004) where he worked in areas of civic
education, democratic training, communication skills and human rights. He has worked as
Communication consultant with (LEAD-Pakistan). Rockefeller Foundation funded project (1998-
99); Editor, State of Media and Press Freedom Report, Pakistan 1995- 2001. He has also been
Bureau Chief of daily The Frontier Post (1991-96).
Mr Zafarullah Khan was awarded M.Sc. Media and Communications from London School of
Economics & Political Science, the United Kingdom (1999-2000) where his areas of specialization
included political communication, media for effective citizenship and cyber sociology. He also did
M.Phil. in 1989-91 and M Sc in Pakistan Studies in 1987-89 from Pakistan‟s leading social sciences
seat - Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad (1989-91). He has done his Graduation from the
Government College, Lahore (1984-1986) with Political Science and History.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 12
He also served as Editor (Honorary), Citizens Wire (www.citizenswire.com): a web-based features
agency on democracy, constitution and public policy issues. He is also Commentator,
analyst/freelance contributor for the broadcast and leading print media. He has been an
Anchorperson, with Pakistan Television's live current affairs breakfast show from December 2000-
August 2002. He also reported the activities/policies of the Prime Minister and Parliament.
He has authored numerous publications on federalism, civic education, parliamentary democracy
and Constitution. The Senate of Pakistan recently published his book, “Consistent Parliamentary
Cord – Fundamental Rights of Citizens of Pakistan,” and a special publication on the Constitution
Day on April 12, 2016. Mr Zarafullah Khan has also contributed chapters in various books, which
include the following:
i. Future of Pakistani Federation: A case study of the Council of Common Interests, in Faiz, A. (2015),
Making Federation Work, Karachi, Oxford
ii. Cyberia: A new war zone, in Yusuf, M. (2014), Pakistan's Counter Terrorism Challenge,
Washington DC, George Town University Press
iii. Constitutional Reforms in Pakistan: federalism after the 18th Amendment, in Hegemer, C. &
Buhler, H (ed). (2013), Federalism in Asia and Beyond: Models, Best Practices and New
Challenges, Munich, Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung
Mr Zafarullah Khan is a distinguished figure in the civil society of the country who has won
important Awards & Honors that include a Roll of Honor (Debating), Government College Lahore
(1986); Best Debater, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad (1988), British Chevening Scholarship
(1999-2000), International Visitors Program (USA) (1996) to cover the Presidential Election-1996
and Green Journalist Award-2001, Ministry of Environment, Government of Pakistan.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 13
PIPS Pre Budget Seminar, May 26th, 2016
BUDGET PROPOSALS
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services (PIPS) held its 5th annual Pre Budget Seminar on May
26th, 2016, which was attended by over 130 Participants including Members of Parliament,
Associations, academia and students of economics. Some of the key recommendations for the
National Budget 2016-17 put forth by key note speakers and representatives of various associations
are presented as under:
1. Dr Aliya H Khan, Dean, Social Sciences,
Quaid e Azam University, Islamabad:
Dr. Aliya pointed out that a cursory glance at the
budgetary allocations in 2015-16 is enough to reveal the
skewed government priorities viz a viz social sector
allocations;
She said that
i. Tertiary education sector gets the Lion‟s share
of the already meagre education budget while
universal literacy and primary education as
promised viz a viz SDGs Goal seems to be overlooked.
ii. There is very little attention paid to preventive healthcare.
iii. Given the scale of urbanization, the state must divert resources to public urban housing.
iv. Allocation of Rs 20 billion for MDGs in 2015-16 was inadequate and there needs to be
well-thought out coordinated effort to invest more in social sectors. Defence spending
needs to be audited
2. Mr. Ali Salman, Executive Director, PRIME Institute:
Mr. Ali Salman, executive Director, PRIME Institute, while speaking on the tax reforms said that
there is a need to move away from complex and progressive taxes towards flat, low-rate, broad and
predictable taxes. He was of the opinion that:
i. “Government must Do-away with patch work, overhaul both policy and administration.
ii. Through Flat, low-rate, predictable and broad-based taxes, administered through
efficient tax apparatus, Pakistan can achieve fairness in taxation system.”
3. Muhammad Din Tahir, Additional Secretary General, Faisalabad Chambers of
Commerce and Industry:
i. Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers Association (PHMA): Zero rating of exports as before
and no duty on raw material imports for re-exports. 5% exports incentives for non-
traditional markets.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 14
ii. Gas tariff should be regionally competitive; i.e. India $ 4.66/mmbtu, Bangladesh
$2.46/mmbtu as against $6.72/mmbtu for Pakistan is not favourable and it increases
cost of doing business.
iii. Sales Tax exemption of 7% on agricultural machinery and equipment may be allowed.
Similarly sales tax exemption be allowed on Pakistan Steel Mills products used to
manufacture agricultural machinery and equipment.
iv. Dyes and Chemicals Association suggests fixed 5% duty on import of all sorts of dyes
may be allowed and there should not be any discrimination on industrial and commercial
importers to import dyes and chemicals. No additional income tax on commercial
importers be charged.
v. Sales Tax Registration limit that remained unchanged to Rs 5 million; should be
increased to Rs 50 million for 2016-17 as it will encourage more people to utilize the
banking channel and become part of documented economy.
vi. 10% Withholding Tax on services may be abolished.
vii. Rate of Value added Tax may be gradually reduced to originally to 12.5 and subsequently
to 10% as it will encourage documentation/ registration of economy and in turn enhance
revenue.
viii. Resolution of disputes through Alternate Dispute Resolution Committees should be
encouraged by making these committees functional.
4. Mr Abdullah Malik, All Pakistan Computer Association:
i. PCA has suggested a Fixed Import Duty of Pk Rs 3,000 per laptop computer,
which are brought in the number of six lac per annum in the country. Presently only
25% of them are imported legally while no less than 75% enter market through illegal
channels. The PCA views sprawling trend of smuggling of IT products responsible for
low income generation to the FBR. Therefore, PCA strongly believes that its fixed duty
formula, if implemented, will yield, an expansive net amount of Rs 1.8 billion annually to
the Government.
5. Mr Zulfiqar Ahmad Kahout, President, Rawalpindi Chamber of Small Traders and
Industries:
i. Relaxation desired for Retail and Agriculture: Agriclutural Machinery be rated from
0 to 5% for imports.
ii. Incentives for Cottage Industry like marble, shoe, furniture and handicrafts for growth
into medium Industry.
iii. Loans on business growth be simplified and should remain within 6% markup.
6. Mr. Khalid Saleem Malik, Central Chairman, Pakistan Poultry Association
1. Continuation of Sales Tax Exemption on Poultry Feed, Sunflower Seed Meal,
RapeSeed Meal and Canola Seed Meal Falling under Serial No. 21, Table 2 of the
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 15
Sixth Schedule of The Sales Tax Act, 1990: Poultry feed should remain exempted from
the levy of sales tax.
2. Withdrawal of Sales Tax on Poultry Feed Ingredients Falling Under Serial No. 15,
Table 1 of Eighth Schedule of The Sales Tax Act, 1990 & Exemption of 8% Sales Tax
on Import of Poultry Feed Additives
3. Harmonization of Custom Duty & Sales Tax on Poultry Machinery & Equipment
with Agriculture Machinery: It is proposed that the import of attached poultry machinery
and equipment be given the same treatment as agriculture plant & machinery and be taxed
@ 2% import duty and 7% sales tax.
4. Adverse Impact of Increase in Custom Duty and Sales Tax on Soybean Meal on the
National Economy: It is recommended to do away with the import duty and the sales tax
on Soybean meal, enabling lower input cost of chicken, eggs, milk, meat etc.
5. Exemption from Regulatory Duty on Import Of Grand Parent Chicks Falling under
PCT Heading 0105-1100: it is proposed that an amendment be made in SRO
568(I)/2014 dated 26.06.2014 wherein under the description against Serial No. 1 i.e. „Live
poultry, that is to say, fowls of the species Gallus domesticus, ducks, geese, turkeys and guinea fowls’, the
words „excluding Grandparent Chicks‟ be added. Thus, by virtue of the amendment the two
categories, which are produced locally i.e. Parent Stock Day Old Chicks and Broiler Day Old
Chicks will be subject to a Regulatory Import Duty of 10%.
6. Restoration of Zero Rating Status for Value Added, Processed, Frozen, Packed
Poultry Products at Parity to Dairy Sector
7. Chicken Processing should be Treated at par with Milk Processing
8. Proposed Sales Tax on Processed Chicken Products: Sales Tax on poultry feed and its
ingredients may not be imposed.
7. Dr Asad Zaman, Vice Chancellor, PIDE
i. He was of the opinion that Pakistan should focus on attaining full employment and self-
sufficiency rather than comparative advantage. He said increasing taxes, FDIs and
exports is a vicious non-starter.
ii. We need to make a paradigm shift to focus development of local market, enhance
indigenous productivity and to create millions of engines of growth. It should not be an
issue that low quality local mass production and market is encouraged as it will
consequently give way to increased productivity and growth.
iii. Zero Based Budgeting must be done in massive departments.
iv. Universal Mass Education must be done on war-footing to complete 100% literacy and
enrollment.
v. We need to shift towards health insurance.
8. Mr Sakib Sherani, Economist
i. Fix the tax system: He emphasized need for greater transparency and accountability in
Policy-setting; tax administration as well as public expenditures. He suggested that
government must:
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 16
a. Broaden the direct tax net
b. Introduce equity and fairness
c. Simplify tax system, and
d. Reform FBR
ii. Reduce burden on Industry/export sector through Restoration of zero-rating, Timely
refunds (+ clear backlog), Removal of GIDC, Reduce corporate tax rate and Reduce sales
tax on inputs.
iii. Re-prioritize expenditure through a Finance Strategic Trade Policy, greater support for
Agriculture, enhanced Education and Skills development for human resource development;
Civil service and FBR reform; in addition to last but not the least need to Re-orient PSDP.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 17
CONCEPT
Economic Indicators – an Introduction with Facts and Figures of Pakistan
Compiled by
Muhammad Faisal Israr,
Vice President Saudi Pak Bank
Economic Policy
A government policy for maintaining economic growth and tax revenues is the Economic Policy. It
covers the systems for setting levels of taxation, government budgets, the money supply and interest
rates as well as the labor market, national ownership, and many other areas of government
interventions into the economy.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (nominal and real)
The value at current market prices, of the total final output produced inside a country during a given
year is Nominal GDP. Whereas Real GDP is nominal GDP corrected for inflation i.e. real
GDP=nominal GDP divided by GDP deflator.
Billion Rs.
Year 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 31-03-
2015
GDP at Current
Factor
14,867 18,276 20,047 22,489 25,402 27,384
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Report FY14 and NDSP)
Gross National Product (GNP) (nominal and real)
The value at current market prices, of all final goods and services produced during a year by the
factors owned by a nation is Nominal GNP. Whereas Real GNP is nominal GNP corrected for
inflation i.e. real GNP=nominal GNP divided by GNP deflator
Billion Rs.
Year 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
GNI at Current
Factor
15,433 19,096 21,082 23,650 26,776
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Report FY14 and NDSP)
Inflation (or Inflation rate)
The inflation rate is the percentage of annual increase in general price level.
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Inflation
(%)
10.1 13.7 11.0 7.4 8.0
Source: Pakistan Economic Survey 2013-14 (Chapter 7: Inflation)
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 18
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
A price index that measures the cost of a fixed basket of consumer goods in which the weight
assigned to each commodity is the share of expenditures on that commodity in a base year.
Wholesale Price Index SBP
Wholesale Price Index (WPI) is designed to measure the directional movements of prices for a set of
selected items in the primary and wholesale markets. Items covered in the series are those, which
could be precisely defined and are offered in lots by producers/manufacturers. Prices used are
generally those, which conform to the primary sellers realization at ex-mandi (market), ex-factory or
at an organized wholesale level.
Sensitive Price Indicator SBP
The Sensitive Price Indicator (SPI) is computed on weekly basis to assess the price movements of
essential commodities at short intervals so as to review the price situation in the country.
Year (Base 2007-
08=100)
Jun 11 Jun 12 Jun 13 Jun 14 May 15
Consumer Price Index 152.78 169.99 179.94 194.74 199.66
Wholesale Price Index 177.98 189.37 199.21 214.60 207.92
Sensitive Price Index 168.09 188.14 196.75 212.40 211.48
Source: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Monthly Review on Price Indices Jun 2011 to May 2015
Labour Force
As per Article 11(3) no one under the age of 14 shall be engaged in labour, therefore, group of
people of 14 years of age and older who are either employed or unemployed fall under labour force.
Unemployment
In economic terms, involuntary unemployment occurs if there are qualified workers who would be
willing to work to prevailing wages but cannot find jobs.
Employment
The total number of people gainfully employed or working.
Employed
To hire or engage the services of (a person or persons); provideemployment for; have or keep in one
's service.
Civilian Labour Force, Employed and Unemployed in Pakistan (in millions)
Year 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Labour Force 53.22 55.91 56.92 57.84 59.33 60.34 60.09
Employed 50.45 52.86 53.76 54.40 55.80 56.58 56.52
Unemployed 2.77 3.05 3.16 3.44 3.53 3.76 3.58
Unemployment Rate
(%)
5.20 5.46 5.55 5.95 5.95 6.24 6.00
Source: Pakistan Economic Survey 2014-15
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 19
Poverty Line
A minimum income level used as an official standard for determining the proportion of a population
living in poverty. Poverty lines are the thresholds which separate the poor from non- poor. The
official poverty line in Pakistan is calorie based, and consumption based absolute poverty is
estimated after converting the household consumption level to adult equivalent based on
recommended nutritional requirements of 2350 calories per person per day and providing almost
equivalent amount for other basic needs.
Poverty Indices by Region (% of population living below national poverty line)
Year 2000-01 2004-05 2005-06 2007-08 2010-11
Poverty Line
(Rs.)
723.40 878.64 944.47 1,141.53 1,745.00
Overall 34.4 23.9 22.3 17.2* 12.4*
Urban 22.6 14.9 13.1 10.0 7.1
Rural 39.2 28.1 27.0 20.6 15.1
Source: Pakistan Economic Survey 2013-14
Domestic Debt SBP
Domestic Debt Domestic debt refers to the debt owed to creditors resident in the same country as
the debtor. It can be of sovereign nature, i.e., borrowed by a government or non-sovereign, i.e.,
borrowed by the corporate.
External Debt SBP
External Debt External debt, at any given time, is the outstanding amount of those liabilities that
require payment(s) of principal and interest by the debtor at some point(s) in the future and that are
owed to nonresidents by the residents of an economy.
Billion Rs.
Debt & Liabilities/
Year
2010 2011 2012 2013R 2014R Mar-15
Domestic 5,440 6,823 8,357 10,403 11,887 12,914
External 5,262 5,707 6,196 6,036 6,459 6,385
Total 10,702 12,530 14,553 16,439 18,346 19,299
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Report FY14 and NDSP)
Monetary Policy
The objectives of central bank (State Bank of Pakistan) in exercising its control over money, interest
rates and credit conditions. The instruments of monetary policy are primarily open-market
operations, reserve requirements, and the discount rate.
Discount Rate
The interest rate charged by State Bank of Pakistan (the central bank) on a loan that it makes to
commercial bank. It is also referred as the rate used to calculate the present value of some asset.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 20
Year 10-
Oct-
11
13-
Aug-
12
8-
Oct-
12
17-
Dec-
12
11-
Feb-
13
24-
Jun-
13
16-
Sep-
13
18-
Nov-
13
17-
Nov-
14
26-
Jan-
15
24-
Mar-
15
23-
May-
15
Discount
Rate (%)
12.0 10.5 10.0 9.5 9.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 9.5 8.5 8.0 7.00
Source: State Bank of Pakistan: Structure of Interest Rates I http://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/sir.pdf
Interest Rate
The price paid for borrowing money for a period of time, usually expressed as a percentage of the
principal per year. Thus if the interest rate is 10 percent per year, then Rs.100 would be paid for loan
of Rs.1,000 for 1 year.
KIBOR (Karachi Interbank Offer Rate) SBP
Interbank clean (without collateral) lending/borrowing rates quoted by the banks on Reuters are
called Kibor Rates. The banks under this arrangement quote these rates at specified time i.e. 11.30
AM at Reuters. Currently 20 banks are member of Kibor club and by excluding 4 upper and 4 lower
extremes, rates are averaged out that are quoted for both ends viz: offer as well bid. The tenors
available in Kibor are one week to 3 years. KIBOR is used as a benchmark for corporate lending
rates.
KIBOR/Ye
ar
30-Jun-10 30-Jun-11 29-Jun-12 28-Jun-13 30-Jun-14 23-Jun-15
Tenor Bid Offer Bid Offe
r
Bid Offe
r
Bid Offe
r
Bid Offe
r
Bid Offe
r
1-Week 11.9
9
12.49 13.18 13.68 11.65 12.15 8.82 9.32 9.54 10.04 6.24 6.74
2-Week 11.9
7
12.47 13.13 13.63 11.63 12.13 8.81 9.31 9.63 10.13 6.29 6.79
1-Month 1.95 12.45 12.12 13.62 11.64 12.14 8.83 9.33 9.73 10.23 6.31 6.81
3-Month 12.0
4
12.29 13.28 13.53 11.74 11.99 8.83 9.08 9.92 10.17 6.65 6.90
6-Month 12.1
2
12.37 13.53 13.78 11.81 12.06 8.84 9.09 9.92 10.17 6.71 6.96
9-Month 12.1
4
12.64 13.64 14.14 11.85 12.35 8.87 9.37 9.92 10.42 6.74 7.24
1-Year 12.2
2
12.72 13.74 14.24 11.90 12.40 8.91 9.41 9.94 10.44 6.83 7.33
2-Year 12.3
0
12.80 13.84 14.34 12.00 12.50 9.18 9.68 11.58 12.08 7.30 7.80
3-Year 12.4
0
12.90 13.94 14.44 12.11 12.61 9.44 9.94 11.88 12.38 7.61 8.11
Source: State Bank of Pakistan
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 21
Balance of Payment
Balance of Payments The balance of payments (BOP) is a statistical statement that systematically
summarizes, for a specific time period, the economic transactions of an economy with the rest of
the world.
Million US Dollars
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Jul-May FY15
Balance of
Payment
-3,771 384 -4,475 -2,232 -1,138 -1,627
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY11& FY14 and NDSP)
Balance of Trade
The balance of trade is the difference between the monetary value of exports and imports for an
economy over a certain period of time.
Trade Deficit
An economic measure of a negative balance of trade in which a country's imports exceeds its
exports. A trade deficit represents an outflow of domestic currency to foreign markets.
Million US Dollars
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Jul-May FY15
Balance of Trade -13,226 12,398 -18,957 -16,919 -19,164 -17,509
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY11& FY14 and NDSP)
Exports
Goods and Services that are produced in the home country and sold to another country. These
include merchandise trade (like cars), services (like transportation), and interest on loans and
investments.
Million US Dollars
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Jul-May 2015
Export of Goods &
Services
24,902 31,124 29,731 31,526 30,423 27,406
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY11& FY14 and NDSP)
Imports
It is opposite of exports i.e. Goods and services brought into home country from another country.
Million US Dollars
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Jul-May 2015
Import of Goods &
Services
38,128 43,522 48,688 48,445 49,587 44,915
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY11& FY14 and NDSP)
Current Account Deficit
A measurement of a country‟s trade in which the value of goods and services it imports exceeds the
value of goods and services it exports. The current account also includes net income, such as interest
and dividends, as well as transfers, such as foreign aid, though these components tend to make up a
smaller percentage of the current account than exports and imports. The current account is a
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 22
calculation of a country‟s foreign transactions, and along with the capital account is a component of
a country‟s balance of payment.
Million US Dollars
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Jul-May FY15
Current Account -3,946 268 -4,658 -2,496 -2,971 -1,985
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY11& FY14 and NDSP)
Foreign Exchange Reserves (Reserves Assets)
Foreign-exchange reserves are called Reserve Assets are those external assets that are readily
available to and controlled by monetary authorities for meeting balance of payments financing
needs, for intervention in exchange markets to affect the currency exchange rate, and for other
related purposes (such as maintaining confidence in the currency and the economy, and serving as a
basis for foreign borrowing)
Million US Dollars
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 31-05-2015
SBP Liquid Reserves 13,112 15,662 10,856 6,047 9,171 11,409
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY14 and NDSP)
Foreign Exchange Rate
The rate, or price at which one country‟s currency is exchanged for the currency of another country.
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 18-06-2015
Exchange Rate (Yearly
Average, Rs. per US Dollar)
83.8017 85.5017 89.2359 96.7272 102.8591 101.8589
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY14 and NDSP *Selling)
Workers’ Remittances
Workers‟ remittances are current transfers for family maintenance by migrants who are employed
and residents in new economies. (A resident is a person who stays, or is expected to stay for a year
or more in an economy.)
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Jul-Mar FY15
Workers’
Remittances
(US$ million)
8,904.88 11,200.90 13,186.58 13,921.56 15,832.25 16,633
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Report FY14 and NDSP)
Market Index
An aggregate value produced by combining several stocks or other investment vehicles together and
expressing their total values against a base value from a specific date. Market indexes are intended to
represent an entire stock market and thus track the market's changes over time.
Index Number
Stock market index is a used for measuring changes in the prices of stock market securities in
respect of the base year prices. The index is used as an indicator of the overall performance of the
economy.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 23
Index Name/ Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 23-Jun-15
KSE 100 Index 9,721.91 12,496.03 13,801.41 21,005.69 29,652.53 34,133.84
KSE All Shares Index 6,809.60 8,663.10 9,708.31 14,987.53 21,973.16 23,958.50
Source: State Bank of Pakistan (Annual Reports FY14 and NDSP)
Fiscal Policy
A government‟s program with respect to (1) the purchase of goods and services and spending on
transfer payments, and (2) the amount and type of taxes.
Fiscal Balance
When a government's total expenditures exceed the revenue that it generates (excluding money from
borrowings). Deficit differs from debt, which is an accumulation of yearly deficits.
Revenue
In the case of government, revenue is the money received from taxation, fees, fines, inter-
governmental grants or transfers, securities sales, mineral rights and resource rights, as well as any
sales that are made.
Expenditure
This includes current and development expenditure on Revenue Account and current and
development expenditure on Capital Account. The term 'Expenditure' as used in Annual Budget
Statement and related documents usually covers Budget Estimates, Revised Estimates and Actual
Expenditure.
Billion Rs.
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 P FY15 (Mar15)
Total Revenue 2,078.2 2,252.9 2,566.5 2,982.4 3637.3 2,682.6
Total Expenditure 3,007.2 3,447.3 4,327.2 4,816.3 5241.1 3,731.6
Deficit -929.1 -1,194.4 -1,760.7 -1,833.9 1388.7* 1,049.0
Source: Annual Reports of State Bank of Pakistan FY10 to FY14 and NDSP
P=Provisional
* deficit reduced by 215.1 due to statistical discrepancy
Direct Taxes
Those levied directly on individuals or firms, including taxes on income, labour earnings and profits.
Million Rs.
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
(Feb15)
Direct Taxes 528,649 602,451 738,424 743,409 877,274 599,298
Source: State Bank of Pakistan and Federal Board of Revenue Year Books
Indirect Taxes
These are contrast to Direct Taxes, which those levied on goods and services and thus only
indirectly on people, and which include sales taxes and taxes and taxes on property, imports and oil.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2016
PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 3, Issue: 5 Page 24
Million Rs.
Year FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
(Feb15)
Sales Tax 517,302 633,357 804,899 842,528 996,100 669,263
Excise Duty 121,182 137,353 122,464 120,964 138,064 88,735
Customs 161,489 184,853 216,906 239,459 242,799 180,766
Total Indirect Tax 799,973 955,563 1,144,269 1,202,951 1,376,963 938,764
Source: State Bank of Pakistan and Federal Board of Revenue Year Books
References
1. Samuelson, Paul Antony, Nordhaus, William D., “Economics 16th Edition”, USA:Irwin McGraw
Hill, 1998.
2. State Bank of Pakistan, www.sbp.org.pk
3. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, www.pbs.gov.pk
4. Federal Board of Revenue, www.fbr.gov.pk
5. Investopedia - Educating the world about finance. www.investopedia.com/
6. Dictionary.com - http://dictionary.reference.com/
For feedback feel free to contact Editor at: Ataturk Avenue (Service Road), F-5/2, Islamabad Email: [email protected] Web: www.pips.gov.pk
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services was established in Dec 2008
through an act of the Parliament to promote research, provide training and to
provide facility of information to the Parliamentarians in performance of their
duties and for matters connected therewith and ancillary thereto.
PIPS team endeavors to serve the Parliament through its cherished values of :
Integrity, professionalism, non-partisanship, accessibility and anticipation
Disclaimer: The author(s) of each article appearing in this Digest is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; the publication of an article shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute any representation by the Editors or Institute.