Plan Summary Preview Company Details Report Details Activities Contacts Select the Facility Contacts Facility Contacts Please assign the appropriate contact under each category below. Organization Validation Company and Parent Company Information Company Details Environment Canada Company Legal Name Graphic Packaging International Canada Corportation Company Address 1355 Aerowood Drive, Mississauga (Ontario) Facility Name Graphic Packaging International Canada Corporation Facility Address 1355 Aerowood Drive, Mississauga (Ontario) Update Comments Public Contact: * Furqan Shaikh Highest Ranking Employee Derek Henderson Person responsible for Toxic Substance Reduction Plan preparation Wasef Jamil Company Legal Name: * Graphic Packaging International Canada Page 1 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:19 PM
Transcript
Plan Summary PreviewCompany Details
Report Details
Activities
ContactsSelect the Facility Contacts
Facility ContactsPlease assign the appropriate contact under each category below.
Organization Validation
Company and Parent Company Information
Company Details
Environment Canada
Company Legal Name
Graphic Packaging International Canada Corportation
Company Address
1355 Aerowood Drive, Mississauga (Ontario)
Facility Name
Graphic Packaging International Canada Corporation
Facility Address
1355 Aerowood Drive, Mississauga (Ontario)
Update Comments
Public Contact: *
Furqan Shaikh
Highest Ranking Employee
Derek Henderson
Person responsible for Toxic Substance Reduction Plan preparation
Wasef Jamil
Company Legal Name: * Graphic Packaging International Canada
Page 1 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:19 PM
Mailing Address
Physical Address
Parent Companies
Graphic Packaging International Inc.
Environment Canada
Corporation
Company Trade Name: * Graphic Packaging International CanadaCorporation
Business Number: * 138137427
Delivery Mode General Delivery
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 1355 Aerowood Drive
City * Mississauga
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** L4W1C2
Address Line 1 1355 Aerowood Drive
City Mississauga
Province/Territory Ontario
Postal Code L4W1C2
Additional Information
Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description
Company Legal Name: * Graphic Packaging International Inc.
Percentage owned: * 100.00
Page 2 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:19 PM
Mailing Address
Physical Address
Facility ValidationThe information in this section was copied from the Single Window Information Manager (SWIM) at the time
the plan summary was created. Please verify the information and update it where required. Please note that
any changes made here will only be reflected in this plan summary. To ensure updates reflected in future
reports, please ensure the information is updated in SWIM. After making updates in SWIM, return here and
click the "Refresh" button to trigger a reload of the SWIM information. Please note all previously entered data
will be modified.
Facility Information
Environment Canada
Business Number: * 138137427
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 1500 Riveredge Parkway Northwest
City * Atlanta
Province/Territory ** Georgia
Postal Code: ** 30328
Address Line 1 1500 Riveredge Parkway Northwest
City Atlanta
Province/Territory Georgia
Postal Code 30328
Additional Information
Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description
Facility Name: * Graphic Packaging International CanadaCorporation
Page 3 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:19 PM
Facility Mailing Address
Physical Address
Geographical Address
Environment Canada
NAICS Code: * 322219
NPRI Id: * 11501
ON Reg 127/01 Id
Delivery Mode General Delivery
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 1355 Aerowood Drive
City * Mississauga
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** L4W1C2
Address Line 1 1355 Aerowood Drive
City Mississauga
Province/Territory Ontario
Postal Code L4W1C2
Additional Information
Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description
Latitude ** 43.64190
Longitude ** -79.63530
UTM Zone ** 17
Page 4 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:19 PM
Contact ValidationThe information in this section was copied from the Single Window Information Manager (SWIM) at the time
the plan summary was created. Please verify the information and update it where required. Please note that
any changes made here will only be reflected in this plan summary. To ensure updates reflected in future
reports, please ensure the information is updated in SWIM. After making updates in SWIM, return here and
click the "Refresh" button to trigger a reload of the SWIM information. Please note all previously entered data
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
At the Mississauga Facility, n-butyl acetate was used as a chemical ingredient present in solvent productsused for the coating, laminating and printing process. With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at theFacility, n-butyl acetate is no longer used.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Page 7 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Use Targets
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Creation Targets
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
This substance is not created at the facility.
Objectives in plan: *
The Mississauga Facility is no longer in operations and use of n-butyl acetate has been completelyeliminated in August 2014. Hence, the objective of the reduction plan for the use of n-butyl acetate hasbeen met by GPC at the Facility.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
Page 8 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Environment Canada
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
At the Mississauga Facility, n-butyl acetate was used as a chemical ingredient present in solvent productsused for the coating, laminating and printing process.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
Yes
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, n-butyl acetate is no longer used.
Page 9 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Materials or feedstock substitution
Product design or reformulation
Equipment or process modifications
Spill or leak prevention
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Good operator practice or training
141-78-6, Ethyl acetate141-78-6, Ethyl acetate
Substances Section Data
Statement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Environment Canada
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, n-butyl acetate is no longer used.
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
Page 10 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Use Targets
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Environment Canada
At the Mississauga Facility, ethyl acetate was used as a chemical ingredient present in raw materials. Withthe shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, ethyl acetate is no longer used
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Ethyl Acetate is not created at the Facility
Objectives in plan: *
Since the Mississauga Facility is no longer in operations and use of ethyl acetate has been completelyeliminated in August 2014, the objective of the reduction plan for the use of ethyl acetate has been met byGPC.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
Page 11 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Creation Targets
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Environment Canada
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Ethyl Acetate was purchased as a chemical ingredient in the raw materials used for the Facility operations.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
Yes
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If you
Page 12 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Materials or feedstock substitution
Product design or reformulation
Equipment or process modifications
Spill or leak prevention
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Good operator practice or training
64-17-5, Ethanol64-17-5, Ethanol
Substances Section Data
Statement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Environment Canada
answered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, ethyl acetate is no longer used.
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, ethyl acetate is no longer used.
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
Page 13 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Use Targets
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Environment Canada
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
At the Mississauga Facility, ethanol was used as a chemical ingredient present in raw materials used forthe laminating, coating and printing process. With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility,ethanol is no longer used.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Ethanol is not created at the Facility
Objectives in plan: *
The Mississauga Facility is no longer in operations and use of ethanol has been completely eliminated dueto cessation of operations in August 2014. Hence, the objective of the reduction plan for the use of ethanolhas been met by GPC.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
Page 14 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Creation Targets
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Environment Canada
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Ethanol was present as an ingredient in product solvents used for the coating, laminating and printingoperations.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
Page 15 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Materials or feedstock substitution
Product design or reformulation
Equipment or process modifications
Spill or leak prevention
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Good operator practice or training
67-56-1, Methanol67-56-1, Methanol
Substances Section Data
Statement of Intent
Environment Canada
Yes
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
With the shutdown of manufacturingoperations at the Facility, ethanol is no longer used.
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
With the shutdown of manufacturingoperations at the Facility, ethanol is no longer used.
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Page 16 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Are the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Creation
Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Use Targets
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
Methanol was present as an ingredient in product solvents used for the coating and laminating operations.With the shutdown ofmanufacturing operations at the Facility, methanol is no longer used at the Facility.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Methanol is not created at the Facility
Objectives in plan: *
The Mississauga Facility is no longer in operations and use of methanol has been completely eliminateddue to cessation of operations. Hence, the objective of the reduction plan for the use of methanol has beenmet by GPC.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
Page 17 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Creation Targets
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Environment Canada
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Methanol was present as an ingredient in product solvents used for the coating and laminating operations.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Page 18 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Materials or feedstock substitution
Product design or reformulation
Equipment or process modifications
Spill or leak prevention
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Good operator practice or training
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
Yes
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, methanol is no longer used at the Facility.
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, methanol is no longer used at the Facility.
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
Statement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Creation
Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Use Targets
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
At the Mississauga Facility, sulphuric acid was used as pH neutralizing means for the wastewater. With theshutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, sulphuric acid is no longer used.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Sulphuric Acid is not created at the Facility
Objectives in plan: *
The Mississauga Facility is no longer in operations and use of sulphuric acid has been completelyeliminated in August 2014. Hence, the objective of the reduction plan for the use of sulphuric acid has beenmet by GPC at the Facility.
Page 20 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Creation Targets
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Environment Canada
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
Ancillary other use
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
The Facility generated wastewater that had to be neutralized prior to discharge to themunicipal sewer. The wastewater was neutralized at the water treatment system in the production areausing sulphuric acid.
Page 21 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Materials or feedstock substitution
Product design or reformulation
Equipment or process modifications
Spill or leak prevention
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Good operator practice or training
Environment Canada
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
Yes
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, sulphuric acid is no longer used.
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
With the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the Facility, sulphuric acid is no longer used.
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
Statement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Creation
Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Environment Canada
TSRP0134
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
At the Mississauga Facility, Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) was used as a chemical ingredient present in inksused for theprinting process. With the shutdown of operations at the Facility, MEK is no longer used.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) is not created at the Facility.
Objectives in plan: *
Page 23 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Use Targets
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Creation Targets
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Environment Canada
The Mississauga Facility is no longer in operations and use of MEK has been completely eliminated duringcessation of operations in August 2014. Hence, the objective of the reduction plan for the use of MEK hasbeen met by GPI.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Page 24 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Materials or feedstock substitution
Product design or reformulation
Equipment or process modifications
Spill or leak prevention
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Good operator practice or training
Environment Canada
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
MEK was present as chemical ingredients in raw materials used for the coating, laminating and printingoperations.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
Yes
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
With the shutdown of operations at the Facility, MEK is no longer used.
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
With the shutdown of operations at the Facility, MEK is no longer used.
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
Page 25 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Environment Canada
TSRP0134
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0134
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Page 26 of 26 Printed on 25/08/2014 7:06:20 PM
Graphic Packaging International Canada ‐ Mississauga Plant(From TRA Comparison Plan in the 2013 Annual NPRI Report)
Year Substance Amount (tonnes) Change (tonnes) Percentage Change Reason for Change2012 Ethyl Acetate 31.72013 Ethyl Acetate 52.53 20.83 66% Change in Production levels
Year Substance Amount (tonnes) Change (tonnes) Percentage Change Reason for Change2012 Ethanol 18.92013 Ethanol 25.12 6.22 33% Change in Production levels
Year Substance Amount (tonnes) Change (tonnes) Percentage Change Reason for Change2012 Methanol 1.832013 Methanol 2.27 0.44 24% Change in Production levels
Year Substance Amount (tonnes) Change (tonnes) Percentage Change Reason for Change2012 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 6.832013 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 9.27 2.44 36% Change in Production levels
Year Substance Amount (tonnes) Change (tonnes) Percentage Change Reason for Change2012 n‐Butyl Acetate 17.42013 n‐Butyl Acetate 24.12 6.72 39% Change in Production levels
Year Substance Amount (tonnes) Change (tonnes) Percentage Change Reason for Change2012 Sulphuric Acid 02013 Sulphuric Acid 0 0 ‐
