Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lars-mendoza |
View: | 27 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Workshop Overview
• Warm-up donut activity – sharing stories
• Introduction to the specifications • Previous scholarship questions• What the examiners look for• Likely scenarios for 2010 • Using a debate to explore a scholarship
question
Definitions• A physical activity programme or experience
may include:– A personal fitness programme– An outdoor education experience– A triathlon– Leisure-based activities– Aerobics routine– Dance performance– Stage Challenge– Festivals that involve movement– Other appropriate programmes/experiences
Sharing Stories – Round 1
1. What programme or experience did you plan for PE 3.1 and evaluate for PE 3.2?
2. What factor had the biggest positive impact on your wellbeing? How did it impact? Why?
3. What factor had the biggest negative impact on your wellbeing? How did it impact? Why?
Sharing Stories – Round 2
1. What programme or experience did you plan for 3.1 and evaluate for 3.2?
2. What were the expected outcomes of the programme?
3. Were they achieved? Why / Why not?
Sharing Stories – Round 3
1. What programme or experience did you plan for 3.1 and evaluate for 3.2?
2. What factors that affected the programme were out of the planner’s control?
3. How could the planning have been improved?
4. Why would it make a difference?
2010 SpecificationPlanning, implementing and/or evaluation of physical activity programmes/experiences
drawing upon knowledge underpinning achievement standards 90739 and 90740.
3.1 & 3.2
Previous Scholarship QuestionsScholarship 2009
Question 1Consider two quotes:“Successful training is intelligent training … as well as the ‘what’ and ‘how’.”“Physical activity programmes must be evaluated to reflect on our progress … and what we have learned from our experiences.”
• Critically evaluate the purpose of the evaluative process• Consider factors influencing participation in the experience/ programme such as: -Equipment & resources -Goal-setting -Logistics -Personal well-being -Methods and principles of training -Purpose -Safety management -Socio-cultural factors• Draw on your own involvement
Previous Scholarship Questions
Scholarship 2008PAP OE
Question 1 Scenario B Question 1 Scenario A
Class 3km ocean swim. Students plan training over a 5 week period
Year 13 class is attending an adventure camp that involves last minute planning
• Evaluate the planning and implementation process used and any issues
• Consider socio-cultural and biophysical factors to
predict outcome
Previous Scholarship Questions
Scholarship 2007PAP OE
Question 1 Scenario A Question 1 Scenario B
Student uses internet to design her PAP programme
Teacher planning for a 3-day tramp
• Evaluate the process that took place• Predict the outcome• Depth & breadth of biophysical and socio-cultural factors
• Evaluate the process that took place• Predict the outcome• Depth & breadth of issues related to OE experience, planning, implementation & management processes
The assessment schedule and examiners reportInformation on the NZQA Website:http://nzqa.govt.nz/scholarship/subjects/resources.html
• Check the assessment schedules from 2009 and 2008– Content information– Markers schedule
• Check the examiners report from 2008 (no 2009 yet)
Remember to
• Consider: purpose, process (planning & implementation), outcomes (intended & unintended)
• Show depth of understanding• Integrate theory with your own practical
examples/experience• Use SEDEC • Be critical
– Examine issues – Examine bias– Challenge assumptions– Identify gaps/omissions
• Make a valid overall judgment with justification
The debate & PMIS tools
• For the debate, the whole group will split into
1. The OE group2. The PAP group
• The debate is aligned to the essay writing process using PMIS as shown in the next slide
Essay Descriptors Debate
Introduction • Key words Relevant content Hard facts
• Background – own experiences this year
Facilitators
Pluses • Positive view point
What do you agree with?
Strengths
• Own experience Other points of view Who benefits? Why is it worthwhile?
Plus group
Minuses • Negative view point
What do you disagree with?
Weaknesses
• Own experience• Other Points of View• What risks are there?• Why is it
problematic?
Minusgroup
Issues/ Interesting
• Examine bias Challenge validity
• Challenge assumptions
All
Suggestions • Solving Issues• Enhancing
programme
• Alternatives• Initiatives• New ideas
All
Conclusion • Reflect Main points All