Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | stephen-daugherty |
View: | 33 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PLASMA
Artificial classical atoms and molecules:from electrons to colloids and to superconducting vortices
François Peeters
V. Bedanov, V. Schweigert, M. Kong, B. PartoensG. Piacente, J. BetourasS. Apolinario
Wigner crystalWigner crystal
Ground state of the electron gas in metalsE. Wigner, Physical Review 46, 1002 (1934)
„If the electrons had no kinetic energy, they would settle in configurations which correspond to the absolute minima of the potential energy. These are close-packed lattice configurations, with energies very near to that of the body-centered lattice....“
- 2D electrons on liquid heliumC.C. Grimes and G. Adams, PRL 42, 795 (1979)
- Colloidal particles on surfaces or interfaces- Dusty plasmas- Charged metallic balls, ….
NbSe2 measured by STM
- Superconductors Abrikosov lattice (1957)Nobel prize in 2003
Theoretical research on colloids in India
• Bangalore (Indian Institute of Science): - A.K. Sood- H.R. Krishnamurthy- J. Chakrabarti
• Kolkata (S.N. Bose National Research Centre for Basic Sciences):- S. Sengupta
Confinement
• Geometrical constrainted motion- 1D: microchannels- 0D: artificial atoms
• Self-organization in reduced dimensions• Reduced phase space
- Diffusion (e.g. anisotropic diffusion)- Non-linear dynamics
Hamiltonian (2D)
Coupling constant
Hamiltonian: artificial atom
Kinetic energy Confinement Interaction
Energy unit
Length unit
2
203 ,
mea
a
aB
B
0
00 / ma
23 For vertical quantum dot:
2 23
1 1
1
2 2
N Ni i
i i i j i j
rH
r r
1. Confinement potential
2. Typical energy scale
3. The considered artificial atoms are two-dimensional4. The number of electrons, the size and the geometry of
artificial atoms can be changed arbitrarily
Differences with real atoms
Real atom Artificial atom
Parabolic potential
2 20
1
2m rr/1
Coulomb potential
0
0Real atom: Ry = 13.6 eV
Vertical quantum dot: = 3 meV
Classical artificial atoms ()
• Potential energy
• Ground state Energy minimalization
22 20
1
1 1
2
N
ii i j i j
eH m r
r r
New units:
2 1/3 1/3
2 2/3 1/3
20
' ( / )
' ( / )
/ 2
r e
E e
m
11 2
2 ( , ,.. ,1
. )N
N
ii i j i j
E E r rrr
rHr
,
0 , ; i=1,...,Ni
Ex y
r
Ground state configurations
Classical configurations
N N ConfigurConfiguration ation
1 1 2 2
3 3 4 45 56 1, 57 1, 68 1, 79 2, 710 2, 811 3, 812 3, 913 4, 914 4, 1015 5, 1016 1, 5, 10
(1,7) (1,7,12)
V.M. Bedanov and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 49, 2667 (1994)Classical atoms (J.J. Thomson (1904))
W. T. Juan, et al, Phys. Rev. E 58, 6947 (1998)
Dusty plasma
Leiderer et al., Surf. Sci. 113, 405 (1982)
(1,7) (1,7.12)Electrons on He surface
Vortices in helium, imaged by injecting electrons that become trapped at the vortex core. (R.E. Packard)
Superfluid helium
Bose-Einstein condensate
Con
dens
ate
dens
ity
MIT, Ketterle group, 2001
Superconducting vortices in a disk
I.V. Grigorieva et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077005 (2006)
Generic model (2D)for different systems, energy and length scales
Dusty plasma Ions in traps Colloids Metallic balls Vortices in SC
Diameter: 1 - 10 m Å 1 - 10 m 0.1-1 mm ~ nm - m
Potential Z ~ 104
YukawaZ ~ 1Coulomb
ParamagneticDipole
K0 (r/)
ln(r/)
ln(r/)
a/ ~ 50 >> 1 ~ 2 - 10 ~ 2 - 10 10 - 1000
m (kg) 10-13 – 10-14 10-26 10-13 – 10-14 10-4 – 10-3 0
Environment Plasma Vacuum Liquid Air (surface friction)
Electron gas
Relax. time (s) 0.1 10-4 0.1 10-12 – 10-13
Dynamics Damped ~ 1 - 10
Undamped >> 1
Overdamped < 1
Damped ~ 10
Overdampd < 1
( ) ( )conf i inter particle i ji i j
U V r V r r
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Superparamagnetic colloidal spheres
2
, 3,
;i ji j
MV M B
r
Metallic balls
10 mm
M. Saint Jean et al, Europhys. Lett. 55, 45 (2001)
1kV~
I.V. Grigorieva et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077005 (2006)
vortex
Decoration exp.
Nb: d = 150 nm; D
1µm; T 3.5 K
V.A. Schweigert and F. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7700 (1995)
2 6
0
Normal modesEigenfrequencies and eigenvectors
2
6
Exp. on dusty plasma:
A. Melzer, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016411 (2003)
N=19 (1,6,12) N=20 (1,7,12)
V.A. Schweigert and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7700 (1995)A. Melzer, A. Piel (Kiel University) => dusty plasma (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 115002 (2001))
Magic number clusters
Melting: small clusters
Radial fluctuations
Relative angularintershell fluctuations
Anisotropic melting Two-step melting process
Experiments on paramagnetic colloids:R. Bubeck et al, Phys. Rev. B 82, 3364 (1999).V.M. Bedanov and F.M. Peeters,
Phys. Rev. B 49, 2667 (1994)
1/ = kBT/<V>
Artificial molecules
Competition between electron correlationsin the single dots and correlations betweenelectrons in the different dots.
d
Classical artificial molecules
1 1 2 2 1 22 2
1 1
1 1 1+
N N N N N N
i ii i j i i j i ji j i j i j
H r rr r r r r r d
N=10
B. Partoens and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3990 (1997)
Competition between particle correlationsin the single atoms and correlations betweenparticles in the different atoms.
0 1 2 3 4 50
2
4
6
8others
ñe
6 c.s 5 chains
4 chains
3 chains
4 chains
2 chains
1 chain
Phase diagramPhase diagram
G. Piacente, B. Betouras and F.M. Peeters., PRB 69, 045324 (2004)
2exp( )i j
ij i ii j
r ry
r rH
=r0/r0=(2q/m0
2)2/3
E0=(m 02q4/22)1/3
zig-zagtransition
Continuous transition 2nd order.
Q1D Q1D channels channels
Institut für Physik, Universität Mainz,
Ion chains
M Block, A Drakoudis, H Leuthner, P Seibert and G Werth
Crystalline ion structures in a Paul trap
Experimental evidence for the “zig-zag” transition
lowerelectrode
groove mg
QE
y
x
Complex plasma
(B. Liu and J. Goree, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 046410 (2005)
A. Melzer, Phys. Rev. E 73, 056404 (2006)
0 1 2 3 4 50
2
4
6
8others
ñe
6 c.s 5 chains
4 chains
3 chains
4 chains
2 chains
1 chain
2 4 transition
Discontinuous transition 1st order
zig-zag shift over a/4
Lorentian shapedLorentian shapedconstriction constriction
V0’
1/
Driving forceDriving force
Pinning and de-pinning of a Q1D system
G. Piacente and F.M. Peeters, PRB 72, 205208 (2005)
Non-linear physics
Increase of the density(no driving force)
Lane reductionat the constriction
W=60m L=2mm=4.55 m 2.5
Phys. Rev. Lett, 97, 208302 (2006)
G. Piacente and F.M. Peeters, PRB 72, 205208 (2005)
7 lanes 6 lanes
Elastic Depinning (small values of V0’)
Quasi-elastic Depinning (large
values of V0’)
f < fc Pinning
f > fc Depinning
v ( f – fc ) β
== 2/3 2/3 as for as for Infinite 2D SystemsInfinite 2D Systems
Elastic depinningElastic depinning
0.000 0.004 0.008 0.012 0.0160.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(b)
T'=0 T'=0.002 power fit for T'=0
vx
f
=1
Vl
0=1
l=1
N=400
= 0.68 ± 0.04
Quasi-elastic depinningQuasi-elastic depinning
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.100.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
T'=0 T'=0.002 power fit for T'=0
vx
f
Vl
0=5
l=1
= 0.89 ± 0.03
N=400
(b)
=1
0 1 2 3 4 50.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
V0'
1
T'=0.002
l=1
N=300
Crossover Crossover from thefrom the elastic elastic toto quasi-elastic quasi-elastic flowflow
Tuning of the critical exponent
Conclusions
• 0D systems artificial atoms- Ground state: ring structures Thomson model- Lowest normal mode: intershell rotation (small N)
vortex / antivortex rotation- Melting: anisotropic (radial / angular)
• Artificial molecules- ‘Structural’ phase transitions
• 1D systems microchannels- Chains: 1 2: zig-zag transition (continuous)
2 4: first-order transition- Constriction: tuning of the critical exponent: from
elastic to quasi-elastic (no plastic depinning)
Scheme of the experimental setup.Pictures are taken from the website of Lin I and A. Piel’s group
Dusty Plasma (Complex Plasma)
14Mhz
Newton optimization technique
( ) ( ), , , , ,
( ) ( ), , , , ,
, ,
1
2
n ni i i i i
i
n nij i i j j
i j
H r H r H r r
H r r r r
position of the particle after n iteration steps
=x,yi=1,
…,N
The potential energy in the vicinity of this configuration can be expanded in a Taylor series:
( ), ,/ ni iH r Force:
2
, ( ) ( ), ,
ij n ni j
HH
r r
Dynamic matrix:
Eigenfrequencies normal modes