+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Plenary lectures

Plenary lectures

Date post: 30-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: truongnhu
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
PL-ISDS Lecture Surgical Education into the Millenium Ara Darzi Department of Surgical Oncology & Technology, Imperial Col- lege London, UK The aim of a surgical residency program is to produce competent professionals, displaying the skills required to meet the needs of society. However, many surgeons are concerned that this will not be possible with the limitations placed upon work hours, together with increased public and political pressures to achieve defined lev- els of competence prior to independent practice. Solutions to these issues require formalisation of residency pro- grams, whereby training occurs within a pre-defined curriculum to teach the skills required. Each step of the curriculum begins in the skills laboratory, utilising tools such as synthetic models, animal tissue and virtual reality simulation. Associated with this is the objective assessment of technical competence using methods such as dexterity-based, eye-tracking and video analysis systems. The development of a simulated operating theatre environment, analo- gous to those used by the military for training in conflict situa- tions, enables assessment of non-technical skills such as decision making and inter-personal communication. This stepwise, competence-based curriculum also enables trainees to leave the program at defined points and allows them to pursue a generalist surgical role as pure service providers. It refocuses the emphasis upon what is learnt as opposed to how many hours are spent in the hospital environment, and enables us to achieve our goal of educating the surgeons of the future. PL-SSAT Lecture Novel Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer for the 21st Century Keith D. Lillemoe Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA Pancreatic cancer accounts for over 28,000 deaths annually in the United States making it the 5th leading cause of cancer death in that country. Although progress has been in the last 20 years in the operative management of this disease, significant progress will be necessary to further improve survival. Improvement in survival for pancreatic cancer must focus upon early detection. The recognition of the familial pattern of pancre- atic cancer may be a key to the identification for some patients. Detection of molecular abnormalities in either serum, stool, or pancreatic juice may allow the early diagnosis. A marked improvement in surgical results has occurred over the last two decades lowering the morbidity and mortality in many centers following pancreatic resection to less than 2%. Further improvements will need to focus on decreasing the incidence and severity of surgical complications. There seems to be no evidence that wider, more radical resection offers any advantage in the cure rates for pancreatic cancer based on prospective randomized trials. Perhaps the biggest area for potential improvement in the treat- ment of pancreatic cancer is in nonsurgical oncologic therapy. Trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy using aggressive chemo-radiation protocols have suggested improvement, but the optimal regimen has yet to be defined. Immunotherapy or other novel therapies may also offer the potential for benefit based on preliminary results. Although significant improvement has been observed in the surgi- cal treatment of pancreatic cancer, there is clearly room for the development of novel treatments for the treatment of this disease. PL-19th WC-ISDS Lecture Extension of Surgical Indications in the Treatment of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Hiroshi Shimada Department of Gastroenterogical Surgery, Yokohama City Uni- versity Graduate School of Medicine, Japan Aim: Whether late results justify extended resection using several major developments for multiple bilor liver metastasis from col- orectal cancer(CLM). Patients and Methods: Out of 364 patients with CLM, 213 patients who underwent hepatic resection were classified into H1(unilateral, n=117), H2(bilateral, <4 nodules, n=46), and H3(bilateral, >5 nodules, n=50). Results: The resection rate of overall, H1, H2, and H3 were 58.5%, 86.7%, 69.7%, and 30.7%. Overall cumulative 5-year sur- vival was 46.7% showing similar survival among H1, H2, and H3. However, disease-free survival at 5 years of H1 patients(31.1%) was significantly higher than that of H2(14.6%) and H3(9.2%). Adjuvant chemotherapy of circadian chronotherapy using FU+FOL+CDDP via HAI provided low toxicity and high response rate(72.7%). In H3 patients, hepatectomy involved straightforward hepatectomy in 20, portal embolization(PE) prior to hepatectomy in 10, two step hepatectomy in 5 and two step hepatectomy with PE in 15, accompanying zero of mortality and less than 20% of morbidity. The latter two approaches were employed in synchro- nous cases. The overall response rate of neoadjuvant chemothera- py(NAC) was 41.7%. 5-year survival was statistically similar between patients who did and those who did not receive NAC(38% vs 35%). Patients who responded to NAC showed sig- nificantly better survival benefit than non responder. Conclusion: Extended hepatectomy including PE and multi-step hepatectomy combined with perioperative chemotherapy for H3 patients can provide same survival benefit as in hepatectomy for H1 patients, especially for patients who responded to NAC. It is an urgent issue to determine what regimen provides best response for each patient resulting in establishment of down staging strate- gies. PL-ISS Lecture Multimodal Treatment in Upper GI-Tract Tumors - Conse- quences for Surgery Ruediger Siewert Dept. of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Univer- sität Münich, Germany Multimodal treatment in the western hemisphere means, neoadju- vant treatment. Reasons in favour of this preoperative treatment: · This type of treatment has been proven as being effective in a prospective controlled trial (MRC-Trial) 1A Vol. 8, No.7S 2004 PLENARY LECTURES
Transcript
Page 1: Plenary lectures

1 AVol. 8, No.7S2004

PLENARY LECTURES

PL-ISDS LectureSurgical Education into the MilleniumAra DarziDepartment of Surgical Oncology & Technology, Imperial Col-lege London, UK

The aim of a surgical residency program is to produce competentprofessionals, displaying the skills required to meet the needs ofsociety. However, many surgeons are concerned that this will notbe possible with the limitations placed upon work hours, togetherwith increased public and political pressures to achieve defined lev-els of competence prior to independent practice.Solutions to these issues require formalisation of residency pro-grams, whereby training occurs within a pre-defined curriculum toteach the skills required. Each step of the curriculum begins in theskills laboratory, utilising tools such as synthetic models, animaltissue and virtual reality simulation. Associated with this is theobjective assessment of technical competence using methods suchas dexterity-based, eye-tracking and video analysis systems. Thedevelopment of a simulated operating theatre environment, analo-gous to those used by the military for training in conflict situa-tions, enables assessment of non-technical skills such as decisionmaking and inter-personal communication.This stepwise, competence-based curriculum also enables traineesto leave the program at defined points and allows them to pursue ageneralist surgical role as pure service providers. It refocuses theemphasis upon what is learnt as opposed to how many hours arespent in the hospital environment, and enables us to achieve ourgoal of educating the surgeons of the future.

PL-SSAT LectureNovel Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer for the 21st CenturyKeith D. LillemoeDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine,USA

Pancreatic cancer accounts for over 28,000 deaths annually in theUnited States making it the 5th leading cause of cancer death inthat country. Although progress has been in the last 20 years inthe operative management of this disease, significant progress willbe necessary to further improve survival. Improvement in survival for pancreatic cancer must focus uponearly detection. The recognition of the familial pattern of pancre-atic cancer may be a key to the identification for some patients.Detection of molecular abnormalities in either serum, stool, orpancreatic juice may allow the early diagnosis. A marked improvement in surgical results has occurred over thelast two decades lowering the morbidity and mortality in manycenters following pancreatic resection to less than 2%. Furtherimprovements will need to focus on decreasing the incidence andseverity of surgical complications. There seems to be no evidencethat wider, more radical resection offers any advantage in the curerates for pancreatic cancer based on prospective randomized trials.Perhaps the biggest area for potential improvement in the treat-ment of pancreatic cancer is in nonsurgical oncologic therapy.Trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy using aggressivechemo-radiation protocols have suggested improvement, but the

optimal regimen has yet to be defined. Immunotherapy or othernovel therapies may also offer the potential for benefit based onpreliminary results. Although significant improvement has been observed in the surgi-cal treatment of pancreatic cancer, there is clearly room for thedevelopment of novel treatments for the treatment of this disease.

PL-19th WC-ISDS LectureExtension of Surgical Indications in the Treatment of LiverMetastases from Colorectal CancerHiroshi ShimadaDepartment of Gastroenterogical Surgery, Yokohama City Uni-versity Graduate School of Medicine, Japan

Aim: Whether late results justify extended resection using severalmajor developments for multiple bilor liver metastasis from col-orectal cancer(CLM).Patients and Methods: Out of 364 patients with CLM, 213patients who underwent hepatic resection were classified intoH1(unilateral, n=117), H2(bilateral, <4 nodules, n=46), andH3(bilateral, >5 nodules, n=50).Results: The resection rate of overall, H1, H2, and H3 were58.5%, 86.7%, 69.7%, and 30.7%. Overall cumulative 5-year sur-vival was 46.7% showing similar survival among H1, H2, and H3.However, disease-free survival at 5 years of H1 patients(31.1%)was significantly higher than that of H2(14.6%) and H3(9.2%).Adjuvant chemotherapy of circadian chronotherapy usingFU+FOL+CDDP via HAI provided low toxicity and high responserate(72.7%). In H3 patients, hepatectomy involved straightforwardhepatectomy in 20, portal embolization(PE) prior to hepatectomyin 10, two step hepatectomy in 5 and two step hepatectomy withPE in 15, accompanying zero of mortality and less than 20% ofmorbidity. The latter two approaches were employed in synchro-nous cases. The overall response rate of neoadjuvant chemothera-py(NAC) was 41.7%. 5-year survival was statistically similarbetween patients who did and those who did not receiveNAC(38% vs 35%). Patients who responded to NAC showed sig-nificantly better survival benefit than non responder.Conclusion: Extended hepatectomy including PE and multi-stephepatectomy combined with perioperative chemotherapy for H3patients can provide same survival benefit as in hepatectomy forH1 patients, especially for patients who responded to NAC. It isan urgent issue to determine what regimen provides best responsefor each patient resulting in establishment of down staging strate-gies.

PL-ISS LectureMultimodal Treatment in Upper GI-Tract Tumors - Conse-quences for SurgeryRuediger SiewertDept. of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Univer-sität Münich, Germany

Multimodal treatment in the western hemisphere means, neoadju-vant treatment. Reasons in favour of this preoperative treatment: · This type of treatment has been proven as being effective in aprospective controlled trial (MRC-Trial)

Page 2: Plenary lectures

2 AJournal of

Gastrointestinal SurgeryAbstract of 19th WC-ISDS

· There are plenty of theoretical arguments in favour of the preop-erative treatment (intact blood supply of the tumor,untouchedgood condition of the patient, immediate beginning of the treat-ment. · The effect of postoperative adjuvant or additive treatment is sofar unproven. What are the consequences of this development for surgery?1. The patient must be seen just after the diagnosis by a tumorboard including surgeons as well as oncologists, radio-therapists,gastroenterologists etc. for adequate decision-making. In our ownexperience of 820 patients with esophageal cancer (out of 4200 GI-tumor patients) the indication for preoperative neoadjuvant treat-ment was seen in 51% of all patients. Only 25% of the patientswere sent to primary surgery. In gastric cancer, 20%of our patientswere sent to neoadjuvant treatment protocols (EORTC-trial). 2. Under neoadjuvant treatment early response evaluation with thePET-technique is possible. 3. We have to distinguish between responders and non-respondersregarding the indication for surgery. Responders will benefit fromsurgery, non-responders have a higher risk, a higher mortality rateand bad survival. 4. We have learned from our own experience that the neoadjuvanttreatment has a so called central petal effect, i.e. the effectivenessof the treatment is much better in the tumor center than in theperiphery and in the lymph nodes. Conclusion: The extent of theresection is orientated on the initial tumor manifestation beforeneoadjuvant treatment. 5. Neoadjuvant chemo-therapy has no consequences for surgicaltechniques. There is no increased risk or mortality in this group ofpatients. On the other hand, following a combined radio-chemotherapy, a long lasting sometimes severe immunosuppres-sion is possible. A so called “safety surgery” is recommended.

PL-ISDE LectureQuality in the Surgical Treatment of Cancer of the Esopha-gus and Gastroesophageal JunctionToni Lerut, Ph. Nafteux, J. Moons, W. Coosemans, G. Decker, P.De Leyn, D. Van RaemdonckThoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Surgical treatment of cancer of the esophagus and gastroe-sophageal junction (GEJ) remains a complex and challenging task.In recent literature a number of authors have advocated to concen-trate these patients in high volume centres in order to decreasepostoperative mortality. However it appears that hospital mortalityis a poor tool to measure the quality. More likely specialisation aswell as appropriate hospital environment supporting a dedicatedmultidisciplinary team are key elements in improving both theshort term and long term results. The dedicated specialist surgeonhas a key role in improving these results through surgical quality.The most important goal in the surgical treatment of these cancersis to perform a complete resection (R0). Data from literature seemto indicate that R0 resection combined with extensive lym-phadenectomy are resulting in improved disease free survival andpossibly in improved 5 year survival, often reported to exceed 35%after such interventions.Obviously these results suggest that thereis a great need for standardisation of surgery. Such a standardisa-tion and the resulting improved quality most likely will result in asignificant improvement of outcome of esophagectomy for cancerof the esophagus and GEJ. These improvements in outcomeshould become the gold standard to which all other therapeutic

regimens should be compared and under no circumstances poorsurgical results by themselves should be a justification for multi-modality regimen.


Recommended