+ All Categories
Home > Documents > pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

Date post: 16-May-2015
Category:
Upload: pmanifold
View: 2,203 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
UTILITY MONITORING & DISTRIBUTION FRANCHISE (DF) - ENHANCING SEB‘S PERFORMANCE Coverage Report from IIES Workshop 30th Jan 2011 Co-chair: Rahul Bagdia, Co-founder pManifold, Head Energy Practice, [email protected] Murhari Kele, Supt. Engg, MSEDCL, Nagpur, [email protected] Prabhakar Kukde, Ex. Director, Tata Power, [email protected] 3/16/2011 Copyright (c) pManifold 1 enabling sustainable growth.. professional people perspire partners persevere prepare policy process plan price project potential profit pursue performance promote progress preserve plural planet
Transcript
Page 1: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

UTILITY MONITORING & DISTRIBUTION

FRANCHISE (DF) - ENHANCING SEB‘SPERFORMANCECoverage Report from IIES Workshop

30th Jan 2011

Co-chair:

Rahul Bagdia, Co-founder pManifold, Head Energy Practice, [email protected]

Murhari Kele, Supt. Engg, MSEDCL, Nagpur, [email protected]

Prabhakar Kukde, Ex. Director, Tata Power, [email protected]

3/16/2011C

op

yright (c) p

Man

ifold

1

enabling sustainable growth..

professional people perspire partners

persevere prepare policy process plan price

project potential profit pursue performance

promote progress preserve plural planet

Page 2: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

SU

PP

OR

TERS

3/16/2011

2

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Industrial Association Partner

Workshop Speakers

Workshop Sponsors Workshop Organizer

www.iies.in

Page 3: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

UTILITY MONITORING & DISTRIBUTION FRANCHISE (DF) –WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES & STAKEHOLDERS

Objective of Workshop

• Create an engagement platform for utilities and businesses to understand each others requirements and constraints well to allow a rationale PPP model emerging & scaling -specifically Distribution Franchisee, its Change Management and Co-creation

• Drive importance of Monitoring (Measurements and Analytics) to improve SEB’s performance and paving way for Smart grid in India

3/16/2011

3

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Page 4: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

UTILITY MONITORING & DF – WORKSHOP CONTENT AND

SPEAKERS3/16/2011

4

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Activities/Topic Speakers

Topic 0: Status quo and impact of DF pManifold Rahul Bagdia(Co-chair)

Co-founder

Topic 1: Issues w/ DF – Utilities perspective MSEDCL Murhari Kele(Co-Chair)

Supt. Engg, Nagpur

Topic 2: KPIs of Utility’s Performance PRDC H.R. Venkatesh Head Marketing

Topic 3: Techno-business Parameterization of

DF (Bidders perspective)

GTL Ltd. Prasad Sutaone DGM

Topic 4: Best practices in DF Implementation

– Techno/Commercial

NDPL Y.S. Butola AGM

Topic 5: Best practices in DF Implementation

– HR/soft issues

NDPL Y.S. Butola AGM

Topic 6: Real-Time Monitoring of Utility sub-

station

Heta Datain Hemant Diddee Founder

Topic 7: Diagnostics & Prognostics in

Distribution Monitoring

PRDC H.R. Venkatesh Head Marketing

Topic 8: R-APDRP implementation – IT,

Automation, AMI

L&T Pratap Dhumale Project Manager

Topic 9: ERP/IT Integration – Smart Grid

Road Map

SPANCO Kamal Maheshwari VP

Page 5: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

NEED OF A GOOD PPP MODEL TO EMERGE IN POWER

DISTRIBUTION3/16/2011

5

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Key issues with Distribution Utilities

• Link from Measurements (MIS) to Effective Distribution Management missing

• Lack of Incentivization

• PSU Organizational Constraints

• No Investment in skill enhancement

• Low Enforcement

• Govt. hindrance & manipulation

• Low Accountancy

All stakeholders potentials constrained

• End consumer not getting reliable, sufficient and rightly priced power

• Generators unable to get guaranteed evacuation of all generated power

• Distributors (Utilities) in losses

• Power Traders do not have predictability

Does Distribution Franchisee with evolving business models has answers to these problems?

• Its only one Delivery mechanism with change in Ownership (an evolved form of Business Outsourcing)

•Underlying phenomenon is Benchmarking Performance and Incentives Alignment of all stakeholders

•Driven by Measurements and Analytics

Revenue –Percentage Based Franchise

Franchise as Subsidiary Company

Employee Run Franchise

Franchise Based on Outsourced Operations

Excerpts from Rahul Bagdia’s @ pManifold presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 6: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

CHALLENGES WITH SCALING DISTRIBUTION FRANCHISEE

MODEL3/16/2011

6

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Performance Benchmarking of Utilities

•KPIs?

•Baseline?

Rational Process design for a good PPP model

•Rational bidding for Distribution Franchisee through right/relevant & common sharing of information with all bidders

Good Change Management

•Handling Transition well and scale-up faster

Good Performance Monitoring

•Measurements and Analytics driven Decision making

Good System Integration

•Distributed Generation

•Distributed Franchisee

•DSM

•Efficient Power Trading

•Choice to consumers

Excerpts from Rahul Bagdia’s @ pManifold presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 7: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

KEY STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS ON OPERATIONALIZING DF3/16/2011

7

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Performance Monitoring of Utilities is must

• Gauging efficiencies & ranking their performance.

• Establishing goals of performance

• Ensuring cost minimization

• Setting target for improvements

• Finalizing resource allocation strategies

• Regulating the sector especially in incentive regulation & setting rational tariffs

• Ensuring sustenance of utilities & sector in long run.

Excerpts from Murhari Kele’s @ MSEDCL ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Stakeholder Concerns Incentives

Utility •Business Performance Monitoring•Quality check on works & material•Timely audit•Transfer of employees•Loosing identity as utility

• Single point control•Reduction in AT&C losses.•No any O&M, Admin. cost & capital cost •Higher recovery of power purchase cost•Monthly fixed revenue/ profit

Franchisee • Surety / confidence about business at starting•Domain knowledge•Handling of Employees of utility•Political & local environment

•No direct monitoring by regulator•Can get access of consumers for 10-15 years•Financial turnaround

Consumers • Fear of tariff increase•No human face •Monopolistic approach•Precursor to privatisation•Harsh treatment by DF

• Reduction in tariff•Transparency in new connection• Will avoid delay in every work•Reduction in load shedding•Good consumers services•24x7 call center & quality power supply

UtilityEmployees

•Transfers•Promotion channel•Reservation•Lack of professionalism•Fear of privatisation•Secondary treatment to utility employees

• Will get more salary•Modern technology update•Best practices sharing•Performance based opportunities.

Page 8: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

MISSING INFORMATION SHARING MAKES DF TRANSIENT HANDLING

CHALLENGING – LITIGATIONS, UTILITY EMPLOYEE RESISTANCE, HANDOVER3/16/2011

8

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Softer Issues on Utility Internal Stakeholders Management to make DF effective

DF Bidding Process and Timelines

• 4 months – Bidding document to selection

• 3 months – Effecting DF operations

• 3 months – Handover formalities

Top Management Understand benefits of DF, but fail to engage top-to-bottom

Middle Management Sandwich between top mgmt. and trade unions

Lower Management Spark exist to support, learn and grow themselves; Fear of privatization

Technical Staff Resistance because of fear of job security based on performance and transfers

Non Technical Staff Resistance to adopt new practices and fear of loosing their importance

Parameters Value Rationale

No. of Consumers HighMore the number of consumers more the revenue and

hence can attractiveness for the franchiseee

Connected Load HighHigh connected load means high consumption and hence

high revenue

Revenue Assessment HighMore the assessment revenue more is the scope of

realisation

Revenue Realisation Low

Collection Efficiency Low

T&D Losses High

AT&C Losses High

Transformer Capacity &

failure rate.High

High transformer capacity shall provide redundancy in the

system and hence can support enhancement in load

immediately

Planned Investment High Makes the area more attractive to the franchisee

To serve the key objective and the basic problem and to

provide franchisee scope for improvement

De

sign

Co

nsi

de

rati

on

s fo

r se

lect

ion

of

DF

are

a

Excerpts from Murhari Kele’s @ MSEDCL ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 9: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

BENCHMARKING BHIWANDI & NAGPUR – 1. BHIWANDI HAS SET THE BALL

ROLLING; LESSONS LEARNT @ NAGPUR & TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION3/16/2011

9

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Parameters Bhiwandi-TPL Nagpur-CGL & SPANCO

Company Profile TPL, Mehta Gr. in pharma, cable & power

gen. dist. business with Rs. 4000 Cr.

having Lowest T&D losses in the country

@ 10% without load shedding in their

area.

1.CGL, Thapar Gr. In manufacturing business

having 20,000 employees in 8 countries and a

Turnover of USD 3 billion.

2. SPANCO-IT based company, now in BPO,

telecom & Power sector

Area allotted Div-1 & 2 , Cons-1,74,000 MHL,GB,CL Div, Cons- 3.7 Lacs

Agreement Period Ten Years Fifteen Years

Base Year 2005-06 2005-06 for CGL & 2008-09 for Spanco

Input base Single input rate payable to MSEDCL CGL- Separate HT & LT rate payable to

MSEDCL. SPANCO- Single input rate payable to

utility.

Bidding Criteria Consortium of bidders are allowed Bidders to individual capacity was only allowed

Investment/capex Rs.60 Crs was committed by MSEDCL

within five years

CGL-No such commitment was in previous RFP

but SPANCO- Rs.60 Crs were committed in RFP

Achievements •ATC Loss--------------- 58% to 19%

•DTC Failure------------ 42% to 3%

•Accurate Metering-- 23% to 98%

•Load shedding-------- 8 hrs to 3.30 hrs

•Cancellation of Agreement of CGL

•Reprocess of franchisee .

•Winning of second bid by SPANCO

Excerpts from Murhari Kele’s @ MSEDCL ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 10: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

BENCHMARKING BHIWANDI & NAGPUR – 2. FURTHER NEEDED IMPROVEMENT

OF BIDDING CONTRACTS TO SUSTAIN CO-OPERATION & BUSINESS VIABILITY3/16/2011

10

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Parameters Bhiwandi-TPL Nagpur-CGL & SPANCO

Indexation of tariff Indexation of Tariffs is based on average tariff applicable to all MSEDCL consumers.

Indexation of Tariffs is based on average tariff applicable to all consumers in the Franchise Area

Input Rate No specification in this regard. It was stated in the DFA that 90% of Input rate payable by Franchisee was for purchase/sale of power and 10% for services, such as right to use network.

Reading Meter reading was made the responsibility of the Franchisee

CGL- HT Meter reading jointly by DF and MSEDCLSPANCO- No such provision

Service quality Failure of the Franchisee to maintain minimum service quality due to inadequate network investments was not specified to be a Critical Event of Default for the Franchisee.

Failure of the Franchisee to maintain minimum service quality due to inadequate network investments has been included as a Critical Event of Default for the Franchisee.

Arrears For arrears the Franchisee is required to remit at least 65% of arrears from Current Live Consumers for three months prior to Effective date.

For arrears the Franchisee is required to remit at least 100% of arrears from Current Live Consumers for three months prior to Effective date.

New Connection Such provision was not provided in case of Bhiwandi.

CGL- The Distribution Franchisee shall grant new connections with a connected load equal to or more than 1.5 MVA only after obtaining approval of MSEDCL.SPANCO-Such condition is deleted.

Excerpts from Murhari Kele’s @ MSEDCL ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 11: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

BENCHMARKING BHIWANDI & NAGPUR – 3. IMPROVEMENT IN PERFORMANCE

FROM DF @ BHIWANDI AND SELF ENTERPRISED FROM MSEDCL @ NAGPUR3/16/2011

11

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Parameter 2005-06 2009-10

AT&C Losses 43.89% 30.47%

DTC Failure Rate

CL 15.12 % 6.27 %

MHL 11.57 % 2.28 %

GB 8.20 % 6.47 %

Load Shedding 5.30 Hrs. Zero

Reactive Power Management

12 MVAr 41 MVAr

EHV Capacity 647kVA 847 kVA

Customer Care Nil CFC,CC

Max. Demand 337 MW 390 MW

Input in MUs 1027.86 1207.79

Billed Units (MUs)573.00 837.54

Demand in Cr. 226.37 434.00

Collection Efficiency

100% > 100%

Parameter On 26th Jan. 2007

On 26th Jan. 2011

AT&C Losses 58 % 18 .5%

No. of Transformers

2254 2611

DTC Failure Rate 42 % 3.05 %

AccurateMetering

23 % 98 %

Collection Efficiency

58.91% 99.16%

Reactive Power Management

Nil 160 MVAr

Modernization of

Power System

Nil Auto Reclosures, EFPS, RMUs, SCADA , AMR

Loading 150 % Balanced

No. of Feeders 46 86

EHV Capacity 550 MVA 1000 MVA

Customer Care Nil Information KIOSK

Consumers Count 1.74 Lacs 2.35 Lacs

@ Bhiwandi @ Nagpur

Excerpts from Murhari Kele’s @ MSEDCL ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 12: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

KPIS FOR UTILITY PERFORMANCE – 1. ONLY RELATIVE

METRICS DOMINANT, NOT TIED TO DIAGNOSTICS OF NETWORK3/16/2011

12

KPI Measures/ Causes Interventions

SAIDI - System Average Interruption Duration Index

CAIDI -Customer Average Interruption Duration Index

information about the average time the customers are interrupted

information about the average time required to restore service to the average customer per sustained interruption

• Use of Auto re-closers/sectionalisers based on analysis of faults transient or semi-permanent or permanent • better loading management/use of good quality insulators.• Use of Fault Passage Indicators in 33 kV & 11 kV overhead lines ( & also in U.G cable systems) for both line to ground fault & phase to phase faults will also reduce fault localization & isolation times • Even one midpoint recloser in a over head line will improve SAIDI by over 10% as compared to a sectionlising switch and further improvements of over 50% will come if single pole reclosers are adopted.

Distribution Transformer Failure

• Failure rates over 20 % in rural & 11-15 % in urban areas are seen•Failure reasons may be Ageing, poor quality of insulation/design/manufacture (many times in repaired units),overloading and absence of LV side protection with poor quality of LV network like loose spans/bent poles etc

• Load balancing, Overloading, Maintenance (Trf and LT mains), • Refurbishment, • Protection (Buchholz relay, HT and LT side), • ABC, Lightning Arrestor, Earthing health

Overhead Line Failure Rates per 100 kms(separate for LT & HT)

• Over head line failure rates/100 kms will give a fair comparison between areas and to plan remedial measures including use of Aerial bunched cables for 11 kV & LT lines in wooded areas

Sup

ply

Ava

ilab

ility

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Excerpts from H.R. Venkatesh’s @ PRDC ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 13: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

KPIS FOR UTILITY PERFORMANCE – 2. DYNAMIC UPDATES OF MIS W/ ASSET MAPPING IS ESSENTIAL FOR AN INTEGRATED INTERVENTION

3/16/2011

13

KPI Measures/ Causes Interventions

SAIFI - System Average Interruption Frequency Index

information about the average frequency of sustained interruptions per customer over a pre-defined area

• Analysis has shown that a mid point recloser in a 11 kV line will improve SAIFI by over 31% ( as compared to a radial system with only sending end breaker)and a 12 % further improvement is possible if single phase reclosing is adopted.

ATC losses clear indicator of utility performanceindicating delivery system losses:• both Technical & Commercial• and collection efficiency

• Software based network analysis will help understand levels of technical losses in 11 kV & LV networks• Measures to be taken like line reinforcement, use of shunt capacitors, feeder bifurcation, use of HVDS, location of new sub-stations after considering load growth & making Cost-Benefit analysis duly considering capital investments needed, LF/LLF, Energy losses saved, cost of capital/energy in the area. • Consumption Analysis of high value consumers (Ice Plants, flour mills, plastic industry) - AMR for continuous remote monitoring• Use of Aerial Bunched cables will reduce theft by direct hooking• Good CTs/PTs in large installations• spot billing using handheld devices & prompt delivery of error free bills to consumer• Suitable bill collection arrangements like cash counters, easy payment kiosks, collection through ECS/bank etc• Prompt disconnection after due date for payment & follow up

O&M Expenses O&M cost/kwhr of energy input • Reduction of DTC failures, • automated remote metering (AMR), deployment of handheld spot billing machines , • better network planning /construction, use of reclosers etc

Co

sts

Rel

iab

ility

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Excerpts from H.R. Venkatesh’s @ PRDC ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 14: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

KPIS FOR UTILITY PERFORMANCE – 3. END-CUSTOMER

SERVICE QUALITY IS UTMOST DRIVER FOR PERFORMANCE3/16/2011

14

KPI Measures/ Causes Interventions

Customer Satisfaction Index

• Customer O&M Complaints• Percent of new connections given with in 2-3 days or with in time stipulated by Regulator.• Percent of Billing complaints resolved in 1-2 days or time limit stipulated by Regulator.• Percent of supply complaints resolved within a day or as stipulated by regulator.

• periodic survey among different class of consumers area wise will give a feed back on their satisfaction index which can include quality of supply, reliability of supply, MBC related service and regarding new connections.• Record of low/high voltage complaints received in service stations, billing complaints, time for getting new connections, time for restoration of supply when there are problems in service mains, feeding DTC

Cu

sto

mer

Se

rvic

eC

op

yright (c) p

Man

ifold

Excerpts from H.R. Venkatesh’s @ PRDC ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 15: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

BEST PRACTICES IN POWER DISTRIBUTION – NDPL CASE STUDY, JV OF

TATA POWER AND GOVT. OF DELHI (STARTED OPERATIONS IN 2002-03)3/16/2011

15

Strategy:

• Focused CAPEX (Rs. 2500 cr. from 2002-2011) towards :

• AT&C loss reduction (<15%)

• System improvement

• Load Growth

• Information Technology

• Consumer service & IT Interface to be comparable with World Standards

• System Reliability to be comparable with Best Utilities in India

• Performance Orientation through Change Management

• Decentralization of O&M activities / function

• Centralization of Commercial activities / Processes

• Replacement of Old Electro Mechanical Meters by Electronic Meters

• Energy Accounting

Results: <15% ATC losses

Excerpts from Y.S.Butola @ NDPL presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 16: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

COMPONENTS OF ATC LOSSES & NDPL USED TECHNICAL LOSSES

REDUCTION MEASURES3/16/2011

16

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

Collection Process Deficiencies:

20. Part Payment by Consumer

21. Non Delivery of Bills

22. Non Payment by Consumer (Defaulters)

23. Premise Disconnected with Dues

Billing Process Deficiencies:

14. Consumer not billed / under-billed

15. Provisional Billing

16. Bills pending for Quality Check (BQC)

17. Bills pending for assessment

18. Meters installed but not appearing in data base

19. Un-metered connections:

(Unauthorized Colonies, JJ Clusters

Street Lights Poles)

Metering Process Deficiencies:

7. Meter (address) not traceable

8. Import / Export Metering Error

9. CT Ratio Errors

10. Stop / Slow / Defective Meter

11. CT Ratio Errors

12. Meters not read

13. Mismatch of Meters

Theft / Unauthorized Use:

2. Direct Hooking

3. Tampering / By-passing of Meter

4. Misuse of Category

5. Use of Multiple Connections - Misuse of Slab

6. Sanctioned Load lower than actual usage

Technical Loses:

1. Iron & Copper losses at

Sub-transmission (66kV/33kV) &

Distribution (11kV & below) Network

Excerpts from Y.S.Butola @ NDPL presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 17: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

NDPL BEST PRACTICES - DT LEVEL ENERGY AUDITNG, SMS BASED FAULT MGMT. SYSTEM, INTEGRATED UTILITY ERP ‘SAMBANDH’, PPPS FOR GOOD LEGAL ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM

3/16/2011C

op

yright (c) p

Man

ifold

17

• Initiatives in Association with Govt.:

• Constitution of Special Court

• Assistance of Police Force / CISF during EnforcementActivities

• Relocation of JJ Clusters to a new resettlementColony (Sawda Ghevra) for providing better services

• Amnesty schemes for settlement of old disputedcases (DT / DAE etc)

• Decentralised Generation

• 108 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant

• Solar PV Based Power Plant

Excerpts from Y.S.Butola @ NDPL presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 18: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

R-APDRP RS. 30K CR. INVESTMENT BY 2012 - REDUCING LOSSES, CONSUMER SERVICE IMPROVEMENT, BRINGING COMMERCIAL VIABILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND REDUCING OUTAGES AND INTERRUPTIONS

3/16/2011

18

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

R-APDRP Part-A (SCADA and IT)

•IT Infrastructure set up

•GIS based Consumer indexing and asset mapping

•AMR of Substation, DT & HT consumer Meters

•IT applications for customer carecentre, meter reading, billing &collection and Business Process Automation

•SCADA

IT and AMI in DistributionR-APDRP Part-B (Renovation & Modernization)

•Turn-key execution of Electrical Network Infrastructure Projects

•Transformer replacement

•New / revamping of sub stations

•HVDS

•Re- conductoring

•Load bifurcation / balancing

•Capacitor banks

•Mobile service centers

Customer Care Center

Infra at

Office Users desk

Disaster Recovery

CenterAMI, SCADA

& Other Entities services

DATA CENTER

System Study

Design

Data Base Creation

Software Development

Testing

Data Migration

Configuration

IT Infrastructures

Network Connectivity

Metering, Billing & Collection

Connection Management

CRM

Work flow management

Seamless data

AMR Data

GIS & Network Analysis

DW,BI & MIS

Energy Audit

We self Service

SCADA DMS

Key Accelerators for R-APDRP success

•Awareness amongst employees & officers of utilities

•Provision of appropriate Meters & space for AMR devices

•Motivating users for actively participate in implementation

•Adoption in change in business processes and practices

•Provision of basic infrastructure required for IT & Automation

•Top managements active involvement for timely decisions & driving

•Dedicated team, nodal officers and coordinators for implementation

•Secure funding

•Selection of right agencies & resources

•Prompt review mechanism

•Appropriate understanding of project implementation to all team members

Excerpts from Pratap Dhumale@ L&T presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 19: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

TECHNO-BUSINESS PARAMETERIZATION OF DF3/16/2011

19

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

DF Capex Investment guiding parameters

• Reduction in AT& C Losses

• Strengthening Distribution Network

• Consumer Relationship Management

• Asset Management

• Improvement in billing and collection efficiency

Transformation through Operational Excellence

Performance Monitoring & Mgmt. crucial

Customer Care & Billing

CRM

Contracts and Billing

Credit Management

Meter Data Management

Advanced Metering

Infrastructure

Validation, Estimation &

Editing

Network Management

Consumer mapping

Network Analysis

OMS / FMS

Operations Management

Asset lifecycle

management

Workforce Management

Excerpts from Prasad Sutaone @ GTL presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 20: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

REAL TIME CONTINUOUS DATA MONITORING – HUGE SAVING

POTENTIAL FROM EFFECTIVE MEASUREMENTS TO ACTIONS3/16/2011

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

20

Transformer Loss rises sharply whenReactive Power is negative. This isshown in these graphs.

This is only possible if theTransformer Electrical parametersare monitored every minute, andnot every hour.

Utilities often ignore the importanceof Data Logging in Real Time, and areunable to capture the behavior ofequipment. This leads to error injudgment while analyzing any fault oroptimizing its use.

Transformer loss

v/s

Reactive Power

Transformer loss

v/s

Apparent Power

Excerpts from Hemant Diddee@ Heta Datain ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 21: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

MEASUREMENT & ANALYTICS - IMPORTANCE OF REACTIVE

POWER3/16/2011

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

21

Zero Active Power does not mean thatcurrent is zero. Reactive Power flowneeds to be monitored also.

The graph below show the output of a30 MW Generator feeding the 11 KVbus. Even when the Active Power iszero (circled black), the Current is 16amps and Apparent Power is 4 MVA,due to Reactive Power drawn by theload.

This is again one area where Real TimeData Logging of various Electricalparameters in Feeders can help detect/ design / and safely operate anyequipment.

Real Time Data logging is cheap, andthe cost will be offset within an year.

Excerpts from Hemant Diddee@ Heta Datain ([email protected]) presentation @ IIES 2011

Page 22: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

SYSTEM INTEGRATION WITH PEOPLE CRITICAL – 68% OF IT PROJECTS FAILS BECAUSE OF LACK OF CAPACITY BUILDING IN

PEOPLE TO USE IT SYSTEMS

3/16/2011

22

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

R-APDRP – Rs. 3000Cr by 2012, one of largest deployment of IT system worldwide

• Change Management critical to transfer skill set from vendors to Utilities

• Machine and people Interfaces to be designed well for easy use by all

Transformation metrics -Systems integration with People (Utilities and end-consumers)

• Customer Service Satisfaction

• Profitability

Benchmarking & competing with World’s Best in Power Distribution

• S.Korea has 2.17% losses within city limits

• 12% ATC losses achievable in Indian situation in 4 years horizon with DF model

Excerpts from Kamal Maheshwari’s @ SPANCO presentation @ IIES 2011

Smart Grid vision for India

• Welcome step from GOI to raise a devoted Smart Grid forum to lay down road map for realistic Indian smart grid

• End key remain to give more ‘CHOICES’ to end-consumer

• Choice of power procured (signaling of differential pricing)

• Monitoring of consumption

• Improved demand and supply matching

• Automatic fault corrections with improved customer satisfaction

Page 23: pManifold Utility DF_IIES_Workshop_report

PMANIFOLD – GROWTH SOLUTIONS FOR EMERGING BUSINESSES

RESEARCH, ONLINE/OFFLINE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT & CONSULTING3/16/2011

23

Co

pyrigh

t (c) pM

anifo

ld

[email protected] (+91 95610-94490)

[email protected] (+91 99234-46100)

www.pManifold.com

Thank You

pManifold Energy Practice Team

• Smart Distribution

• Energy Conservation

• Green Generation


Recommended