Date post: | 14-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | chapter-11-dockets |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 63
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
1/63
NY 243288140v12
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re:
PMGI Holdings, Inc., et al.,
1
Debtors.
Chapter 11
Case No. 13-12404 (CSS)
(Joint Administration Requested)
DECLARATION OF EZRA SHASHOUA
IN SUPPORT OF THE DEBTORS CHAPTER 11
PETITIONS AND REQUESTS FOR FIRST DAY RELIEF
EZRA SHASHOUA hereby declares, under penalty of perjury, as follows:
1.
I am the Chief Financial Officer of FriendFinder Networks Inc. (FFN together
with the above-captioned debtors and debtors-in-possession, the Debtors or the Company).
I perform my duties out of FFNs headquarters located at 6800 Broken Sound Parkway NW,
Suite 200, in Boca Raton, Florida. I submit this declaration (the Declaration) in support of the
Debtors chapter 11 petitions and requests for relief contained in certain first day applications
and motions filed on or shortly after the date hereof (the First Day Motions).
2. I joined FFN as the Chief Financial Officer in 2008. I previously served as anExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cruzan International, Inc., a publicly
held spirits company. Prior to my employment with Cruzan International, Inc., I served in a
1The Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases, along with the last four (4) digits of each Debtor's federal tax identificationnumber, are: Blue Hen Group Inc. (9667), Argus Payments Inc. (4661), Big Island Technology Group, Inc. (9795),Confirm ID, Inc. (7020), Danni Ashe, Inc. (5271), Fastcupid, Inc. (7869), Fierce Wombat Games Inc. (2019),FriendFinder California Inc. (2750), FriendFinder Networks Inc. (0988), FRIENDFINDER VENTURES INC.
(3125), FRNK Technology Group (7102), General Media Art Holding, Inc. (2637), General MediaCommunications, Inc. (2237), General Media Entertainment, Inc. (2960), Global Alphabet, Inc. (7649), GMCIInternet Operations, Inc. (7655), GMI On-Line Ventures, Ltd. (7656), Interactive Network, Inc. (5941), MagnoliaBlossom Inc. (8925), Medley.com Incorporated (3594), NAFT NEWS CORPORATION (4385), Penthouse DigitalMedia Productions Inc. (1056), Penthouse Images Acquisitions, Ltd. (9228), PerfectMatch Inc. (9020), PLAYTIMEGAMING INC. (4371), PMGI Holdings Inc. (2663), PPM Technology Group, Inc. (9876), Pure EntertainmentTelecommunications, Inc. (9626), Sharkfish, Inc. (1221), Snapshot Productions, LLC (7091), Streamray Inc. (2716),Streamray Studios Inc. (1009), Tan Door Media Inc. (1100),Traffic Cat, Inc. (1223), Transbloom, Inc. (1168),Various, Inc. (7762), Video Bliss, Inc. (6760), West Coast Facilities Inc. (4751), XVHUB Group Inc. (9401). TheDebtors business address is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33487.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
2/63
NY 243288140v12 2
similar capacity at NationsRent, Inc., a publicly held equipment rental company where I helped
lead a successful restructuring. Prior to my employment with NationsRent, Inc., I was employed
at 7-Eleven, Inc., where I served in a number of roles over an 18 year period, culminating in my
appointment as Chief Financial Officer. During my tenure at 7-Eleven, Inc., the company went
through a leveraged buyout, reorganization and sale. Prior to my time at 7-Eleven, Inc., I was an
attorney at the law firm of Sonnenschein Nath and Rosenthal. I hold a Bachelor of Arts from
Northwestern University and a Juris Doctorate from Illinois Institute of Technology-Chicago
Kent College of Law.
3.
As the Chief Financial Officer of FFN, I am authorized to submit this Declaration
on behalf of the Debtors. Except as indicated otherwise, all statements in this Declaration are
based upon my personal knowledge or my review of the Debtors books and records, other
relevant documents and information prepared or collected by the Debtors employees. If I were
called to testify as a witness in this matter, I could and would competently testify to each of the
facts set forth herein. In making the statements herein, I have relied in part upon others to
accurately record, prepare and collect necessary documentation and information.
4. Part I of this Declaration provides a brief overview of the Debtors and a summaryof these Chapter 11 Cases (as defined below). Part II of this Declaration describes in more detail
the Debtors business, the developments which led to the Debtors chapter 11 filings and their
goals in these Chapter 11 Cases. Part III sets forth the relevant details of the various First Day
Motions.
I.INTRODUCTION
5. The Debtors are an internet and technology company providing services in thesocial networking and web-based video sharing markets. The Debtors businesses consist of
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 2 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
3/63
NY 243288140v12 3
creating and operating technology platforms, which run several websites throughout the world
appealing to users of diverse cultures and interest groups. The Debtors are also engaged in
entertainment activities consisting of publishing, licensing, studio production and distribution of
adult entertainment and materials. The Debtors publish Penthouse and other adult-oriented
magazines and digests. Additionally, the Debtors license the Penthouse name for the
international publication of various adult magazines and for use on various products and provide
adult-oriented multimedia entertainment products and services, including content for pay-per-
view programming.
6.
The Debtors focus on three distinct lines of business. First, the Debtors are a
leading internet company providing services in the rapidly expanding markets of adult dating and
social networking. The Debtors websites include social networking and online personals, which
allow customers to socialize and connect with other users and groups, based on various interests,
including ethnic, cultural and entertainment interests. Secondly, the Debtors operate a wide
variety of internet websites, and offer online products and services, which provide adult-oriented
content. These websites include live and recorded video, online chat rooms, instant messaging,
and photo and video sharing. In order to provide content on these websites, the Debtors utilize a
number of performers whom provide entertainment services to the Debtors customers and
members on a daily basis. These performers have cultivated relationships with customers and
members that may span many years, and as a result, the customers and members are extremely
loyal to the entertainment services provided by the Debtors. Finally, the Debtors produce and
distribute original adult-themed pictorial and video content, license the globally recognized
Penthouse brand and publish several branded mens lifestyle magazines.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 3 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
4/63
NY 243288140v12 4
7. In order to drive traffic to their websites, the Debtors employ a number ofmarketing programs. Currently, there are approximately 5,847 websites affiliated with, but not
owned by, the Debtors that help direct potential customers to the Debtors websites. The
Debtors maintain a referral and marketing program to compensate these affiliated parties based
upon the number of potential customers directed to the Debtors websites.
8. The Debtors are all located in the United States although, due to the internet-based nature of their business, their operations reach to over 200 countries around the globe. In
addition to the Debtors, the Debtors corporate group includes fifteen (15) non-debtor foreign
entities (the Non-Debtor Entities). None of the Non-Debtor Entities filed chapter 11
petitions. The Debtors have more than 435 employees and, together with the Non-Debtor
Entities, have more than 220 million members. The Debtors extensive network of more
than 8,000 websites included more than 750,000 subscribers as of December 31, 2012.
9. Although the Debtors continue to maintain and develop their networks, serve theircustomers and produce printed products, the Debtors have been actively pursuing a financial
restructuring or refinancing transaction since October 2012. Those efforts resulted in the
Company and certain holders of the Debtors secured debt entering into a Transaction Support
Agreement dated as of September 16, 2013 (as amended or modified, the TSA) pursuant to
which the parties agreed to pursue the confirmation of a plan of reorganization on terms set forth
in the TSA. Simply put, these Chapter 11 Cases are intended to implement a prompt financial
restructuring of the Debtors secured debt and is intended to satisfy in full the claims of the
Debtors general unsecured creditors.
10. The Debtors intend to file theirJoint Plan Of Reorganization Of PMGI Holdings,Inc. Et Al. Under Chapter 11 Of The Bankruptcy Code (as amended or modified, the Plan) and
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 4 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
5/63
NY 243288140v12 5
related solicitation documents, which embodies the Recapitalization Transaction contemplated
by the TSA prior to the first day hearing. In order to implement that transaction by way of
confirmation of the Plan on an expedited basis, the Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases on
the date hereof (the Petition Date) by filing voluntary petitions for relief under title 11 of the
United States Code, 11 U.S.C. 101-1532 (the Bankruptcy Code), in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). The Debtors intend
to seek confirmation of the Plan promptly in these Chapter 11 Cases.
11. Because the Debtors intend to operate their businesses in the ordinary courseduring the pendency of these Chapter 11 Cases, and in order to minimize the adverse effects of
the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases on their business, the Debtors request various
forms of relief in the First Day Motions. The First Day Motions are described in greater detail in
Part III below, but generally, seek, among other things, the Bankruptcy Courts authority to: (a)
continue the Debtors operations with as little disruption as possible; (b) maintain the confidence
and loyalty of the Debtors customers and employees; (c) obtain authority to consensually use
cash collateral; (d) comply with applicable state statutes and regulations; (e) assume the TSA;
and (f) retain appropriate professionals. Maintaining the support of the Debtors key
constituencies, as well as operating the Debtors day-to-day business with minimal disruption
and erosion, is crucial to the success of the Debtors efforts to maximize the value of the
Debtors estates and to ensure an expeditious resolution of these Chapter 11 Cases.
II.BACKGROUND
A. Overview of the Debtors12. In December 2007, FFN acquired Various, Inc., for approximately $401.0 million.
The aggregate purchase price of approximately $401.0 million consisted of approximately
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 5 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
6/63
NY 243288140v12 6
(i) $137.0 million in cash, (ii) notes valued at approximately $248.0 million, and (iii) warrants to
acquire approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain
anti-dilution provisions, valued at approximately $16.0 million.
13. On October 27, 2010, FFN completed a debt restructuring, which consolidatedsubstantially all of its debt into three tranches with maturities on September 30, 2013 and
April 30, 2014. Those tranches were the (i) 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 (the First
Lien Notes) issued pursuant to the First Lien Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010 (as
amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the First Lien
Indenture), and together with all agreements, documents, notes and instruments in respect
therefore (the First Lien Credit Documents), between and among the Debtors and
Wilmington Trust, a national banking association (as successor to U.S. Bank National
Association), as trustee and collateral agent (in its capacity as trustee, the First Lien Trustee
and in its capacity as collateral agent, theFirst Lien Collateral Agent)and the noteholders
that are parties thereto from time to time (the First Lien Noteholders), (ii) the 11.5% Non-
Cash Pay Secured Notes Due 2014 (the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes) issued pursuant to
the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010 (as amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the Non-Cash Pay Indenture) and
together with all agreements, documents, notes and instruments in respect therefore (the Non-
Cash Pay Credit Documents), between and among the Debtors and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A., a national banking association (as successor to U.S. Bank National Association)
as trustee and collateral agent (in its capacity as trustee, the Non-Cash Pay Trustee and in its
capacity as collateral agent, the Non-Cash Pay Collateral Agent) and the noteholders that are
parties thereto (the Non-Cash Pay Noteholders), and (iii) the 14% Cash Pay Secured Notes
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 6 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
7/63
NY 243288140v12 7
Due 2013 (the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes) issued pursuant to the Cash Pay Second Lien
Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the Cash Pay Indenture) and together with all agreements,
documents, notes and instruments in respect therefore (the Cash Pay Credit Documents),
between and among the Debtors and U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking
association as trustee and collateral agent (in its capacity as trustee, the Cash Pay Trustee and
in its capacity as collateral agent, the Cash Pay Collateral Agent) and the noteholders that are
parties thereto (the Cash Pay Noteholders).
14.
On May 16, 2011, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a
price of $10.00 per share and completed its Initial Public Offering (the IPO). The Company
raised gross proceeds of $50.0 million in the IPO, less underwriting fees, other offering fees and
commissions. The Company used the net proceeds of the IPO to repay a portion of its existing
indebtedness. Following the IPO, the equity of FFN was traded on NASDAQ Global Market
under the ticker symbol FFN from until August 7, 2013. Beginning on August 8, 2013, the
equity of FFN began trading on the OTCQB Marketplace under the ticker symbol FFNT.
15. On July 12, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all the assets ofPerfectMatch.com from Matrima, Inc., for approximately $2,000,000 in cash and common shares
of FFN worth approximately $500,000.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 7 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
8/63
NY 243288140v12 8
B. Corporate Structure16. The chart attached hereto as Exhibit A depicts the Debtors prepetition
organizational structure.
C. Prepetition Capital Structure17. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had outstanding debt obligations in the
aggregate principal amount of $530.9 million, consisting primarily of their obligations under the
First Lien Notes, the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.
(i) First Lien Credit Documents
18. As of the Petition Date, the First Lien Notes were outstanding in a principalamount of approximately $234,297,907.80, plus all interest accrued thereon at the applicable
default rate, plus all fees, costs, expenses, and costs of collection (including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys, financial advisors and other professionals fees and expenses fees) as set
forth in the Existing First Lien Credit Documents. The First Lien Notes had a stated maturity of
September 30, 2013, and bear interest at a non-default rate per annum equal to 14.0%. The First
Lien Notes were issued by FFN and Interactive Network, Inc. (INI), and guaranteed by all of
the other Debtors. The First Lien Notes are collateralized by a first-priority lien on substantially
all of the Debtors assets as well as a pledge of the stock of certain of the Debtors. On
August 5, 2013, the First Lien Trustee declared all of the First Lien Notes to be due and payable
immediately. Holders of approximately 80% in principal amount of the First Lien Notes are
parties to the TSA.
(ii) Non-Cash Pay Credit Documents
19. As of the Petition Date, the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were outstanding ina principal amount of approximately $320,254,296, plus such all interest accrued thereon at the
applicable default rate, plus all fees, costs, expenses, and costs of collection (including, without
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 8 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
9/63
NY 243288140v12 9
limitation, reasonable attorneys fees) as set forth in the Non-Cash Pay Credit Documents. The
Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes had a stated maturity of April 30, 2014, and bear interest at a
non-default rate per annum of 11.5%. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were issued by
FFN and INI and are guaranteed by all of the other Debtors. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien
Notes are collateralized by a second-priority lien on substantially all of the Debtors assets as
well as a pledge of the stock of certain of the Debtors. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes
are subordinated to the First Lien Notes pursuant to that certain Intercreditor and Subordination
Agreement, dated October 27, 2010 (the First Lien ICA). The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien
Notes arepari passu with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes pursuant to that certain Second Lien
Intercreditor Agreement, dated October 27, 2010 (the Second Lien ICA). Holders of
approximately 78% in principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are parties to
the TSA.
(iii) Cash Pay Credit Documents
20. As of the Petition Date, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were outstanding in aprincipal amount of approximately $10,572,417.70, plus all interest accrued thereon at the
applicable default rate, plus all fees, costs, expenses, and costs of collection (including, without
limitation, reasonable attorneys fees) as set forth in the Cash Pay Credit Documents. The Cash
Pay Second Lien Notes had a stated maturity of September 30, 2014, and were issued with an
original issue discount of $276,000 or 2%. The Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were issued by
FFN and INI and are guaranteed by all of the other Debtors. The Cash Pay Second Lien Notes
are collateralized by a second-priority lien on substantially all of the Debtors assets as well as a
pledge of the stock of certain of the Debtors. The Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are subordinated
to the First Lien Notes pursuant to the First Lien ICA. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 9 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
10/63
NY 243288140v12 10
arepari passu with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes pursuant to the Second Lien ICA. As to
matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies, the Cash Pay Second
Lien Notes are included with the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes for purposes of determining
the required consents or waivers. On August 7, 2013, the Cash Pay Second Lien Trustee
declared all of the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes to be due and payable immediately. All of the
Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are held indirectly by Marc H. Bell and Daniel C. Staton,
substantial holders of equity in FFN, consultants to the Company and the non-executive
chairmen of the Company. Messrs. Bell and Staton are not party to the TSA, however, pursuant
to the Bell/Staton Settlement (defined below), Messrs. Bell and Staton have agreed to support the
Plan. Thus, holders of 100% of the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes have agreed to support the
Plan.
D. Events Leading to the Chapter 11 Filing21. These Chapter 11 Cases were commenced to implement the transactions set forth
in the TSA and the Plan (the Recapitalization Transaction). The Recapitalization
Transaction will allow the Debtors to continue and improve their operations, and provide the
financial stability to grow and enhance their product lines and serve their customers.
22. The Recapitalization Transaction was made necessary by the Debtors decliningfinancial performance and pending debt maturities. The Debtors total revenue for the four
consecutive fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2013, was $293.70 million compared to $326.50
million for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2012, representing a decrease of
approximately 10.1%. That revenue decline was primarily attributable to the decrease in internet
revenue, as social networking websites revenue decreased by approximately 17.6% during that
period due primarily to a decrease in traffic to the Companys websites. The live interactive
video websites revenue increased by approximately 7.8% during the same period; however the
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 10 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
11/63
NY 243288140v12 11
increase in live interactive websites revenue failed to offset the decrease in social networking
website revenue. The decrease in the Debtors internet revenues is attributable to a number of
factors, including, a decline in the Debtors website membership and increased advertising and
affiliate costs; however, the decrease in the Debtors revenues was also exacerbated by an
increase in credit card companies denying transactions and refusing to process transactions for
the Debtors internet businesses.2
23. In November 2012, the Company did not make certain payments to the holders ofFirst Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, which constituted an event of default under
their respective Indentures. On November 5, 2012, certain of the First Lien Noteholders, agreed
to forbear from the exercise of their rights and remedies under the First Lien Indenture pursuant
to that certain Forbearance Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment to Forbearance
Agreement dated February 4, 2013, the Second Amendment to Forbearance Agreement dated
May 6, 2013, the Third Amendment to Forbearance Agreement dated June 7, 2013, and the
Fourth Amendment to Forbearance Agreement dated July 1, 2013 (collectively the Prior
Forbearance Agreement), which expired on July 31, 2013. Further, on August 5, 2013, the
First Lien Indenture was accelerated, but on August 7, 2013, certain of the First Lien
Noteholders agreed to forbear from the exercise of their rights and remedies pursuant to that
certain Forbearance Agreement entered into on August 5, 2013 (the Forbearance
Agreement). As of the Petition Date, all of the forbearance agreements had expired.
2 In order to operate their businesses, the Debtors rely on revenue from credit card transactions; in fact, in thenormal course of business, more than 95% of the Debtors total sales result from credit card transactions. In order toprocess these transactions, the Debtors have relationships with approximately 25 credit card processors. Thesecredit card processors provide the Debtors with processing service for all credit cards accepted by the Debtors,which include Visa, MasterCard and American Express.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 11 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
12/63
NY 243288140v12 12
24. As detailed above, in early August 2013, the First Lien Trustee accelerated theFirst Lien Notes and the Cash Pay Second Lien Trustee accelerated the Cash Pay Second Lien
Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were not accelerated as of the Petition Date.
Despite the Debtors efforts detailed below, the Debtors were unable to obtain sufficient
financing or investment to repay their obligations under the First Lien Notes, Non-Cash Pay
Second Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. As a result, the Debtors and holders of a
substantial majority of each of the First Lien Notes (collectively, the Consenting First Lien
Noteholders) and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes (collectively, the Consenting Second
Lien Noteholders) agreed enter into the TSA and the Debtors filed these Chapter 11 Cases in
furtherance of the Recapitalization Transaction contemplated thereunder.
E. Efforts to Restructure25. Having determined that restructuring would be necessary, in late 2012, the
Debtors began to pursue a restructuring transaction and retained CRT Capital Group, Inc.
(CRT), to assist with those efforts. Beginning at that time and continuing throughout 2013,
the Company, pursued several options with third parties to (i) delever the Company, or
(ii) consummate a sale to a third party. None of those third-party transactions ultimately came to
fruition.
26. In parallel with its efforts to identify a potential third-party transaction, theCompany and the Consenting First Lien Noteholders and the Consenting Second Lien
Noteholders negotiated the terms of the Recapitalization Transaction. After substantial, arms
length negotiations, on September 16, 2013, the Company, the Consenting First Lien
Noteholders and the Consenting Second Lien Noteholders entered into the TSA.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 12 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
13/63
NY 243288140v12 13
27. The Recapitalization Transaction set forth in the TSA3 provides for among otherthings: (i) the issuance of new first lien notes (the New First Lien Notes), (ii) the issuance of
new common stock of a reorganized FFN, (iii) the Bell/Staton Settlement (described below), and
(v) certain releases and exculpations. The TSA contemplates that the Recapitalization
Transaction will be implemented through a chapter 11 proceeding and the expedited
confirmation of the Plan. Pursuant to the TSA, the Plan classifies the various claims asserted
against the Debtors, and provides that all Administrative Expense Claims, Priority Tax Claims,
Other Priority Claims, and General Unsecured Claims (each as defined in the Plan) will be paid
in full in cash on the effective date or otherwise unimpaired.
28. Under the TSA the Company is obligated to, among other things: (i) usecommercially reasonable efforts in furtherance of the Recapitalization Transaction, and
(ii) subject to certain termination events related to the Board of Directors fiduciary duties,
pursue the confirmation of the Plan, which effects the Recapitalization Transaction. The TSA
further provides that the Consenting First Lien Noteholders and the Consenting Second Lien
Noteholders will, among other things: (i) if appropriately solicited under the Bankruptcy Code,
vote all claims in interest in support of a plan which effects the Recapitalization Transaction and
is materially consistent with the Plan Term Sheet, (ii) negotiate any plan documents in good faith,
(iii) grant certain releases detailed in the Plan Term Sheet, and (iv) not object or otherwise
oppose a plan that is materially consistent with the Plan Term Sheet and which implements the
Recapitalization Transaction.
29. The TSA includes certain termination events including, among others: (i) uponthe mutual written consent of the Debtors, the Consenting First Lien Noteholders and the
3The summary of the terms of the TSA contained herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the TSA. If there
are any inconsistencies between this summary and the terms of the TSA, the TSA shall govern in all respects.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 13 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
14/63
NY 243288140v12 14
Consenting Second Lien Noteholders, (ii) by the Debtors in the event that the Debtors continued
support of the Plan would be inconsistent with the exercise of its fiduciary duties, (iii) upon the
effective date of the Plan or upon closing of another transaction, including a merger or change of
control transaction that is approved by the Debtors, the Consenting First Lien Noteholders and
the Consenting Second Lien Noteholders, (iv) automatically after January 31, 2014, if the
Effective Date of the Plan has not occurred, or (v) by the Consenting First Lien Noteholders or
the Consenting Second Lien Noteholders upon the occurrence of certain events, including the
Debtors failure to comply with certain milestones detailed in the TSA.
F.
The Bell/Staton Settlement
30. The TSA and the Plan incorporate the terms of a consensual settlement betweenthe Company (with the consent of the Consenting First Lien Noteholders and the Consenting
Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Noteholders) on the one hand, and Messrs. Bell and Staton on the
other (the Bell/Staton Settlement). The Bell/Staton Settlement resolves certain outstanding
issues related to certain consulting agreements and other claims between the Company and
Messrs. Bell and Staton.
31. Pursuant to the Bell/Staton Settlement, among other things, (i) Messrs. Bell andStaton will each receive $500,000 in cash as full payment and release of all obligations of any of
the Debtors under those certain consulting agreements upon entry of a final order by the
Bankruptcy Court approving the use of Cash Collateral on a final basis (or otherwise on the
occurrence of the Effective Date of the Plan), (ii) the Plan will provide that the Cash Pay Second
Lien Notes will receive the same treatment as the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, (iii) Messrs.
Bell and Staton will support the Plan; (iv) Messrs. Bell and Staton will agree to and execute a
customary two (2) year non-competition and non-disparagement agreements, and (v) Messrs.
Bell and Staton will receive releases from the Company upon the confirmation of the Plan. The
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 14 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
15/63
NY 243288140v12 15
Bell/Staton Settlement also provides that that Bankruptcy Court retains authority to clawback
any payments made to Mr. Bell and/or Mr. Staton if (i) the Bankruptcy Court determines that
Mr. Bell, Mr. Staton, or any related party did not comply with their obligations under the
Bell/Staton Settlement, (ii) the TSA terminates in accordance with its terms and the Debtors
either withdraw the Plan or modify the Plan to be inconsistent in any material respect with the
Plan Term Sheet, (iii) the Debtors right to use Cash Collateral terminates, or (iv) confirmation
of the Plan is denied.
32. The Bell/Staton Settlement Agreement resolves consensually various issues,which could otherwise be the subject of litigation during these Bankruptcy Cases, including the
classification and treatment of the claims associated with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and
the classification and treatment of claims related to the consulting agreements.
33. In consultation with their professionals and after careful examination by theBoard of Directors, the Debtors determined ultimately that, rather than to continue to pursue
alternative transactions or seek additional forbearances from their secured lenders, executing the
TSA, commencing these Chapter 11 Cases, and pursuing the confirmation of a plan of
reorganization implanting the terms contained in the Plan Term Sheet, represented the
Companys best opportunity to sustain their going-concern operations and to preserve and
maximize value for their creditors and estates.
34. Given the Debtors current financial condition, financing arrangements, andcapital structure, the Debtors have been unable to obtain financing from sources on terms more
favorable than provided for in the Cash Collateral Order. The Debtors likewise have been unable
to obtain unsecured credit allowable under Section 364(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code as an
administrative expense.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 15 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
16/63
NY 243288140v12 16
III.FIRST DAY MOTIONS
4
35. Concurrently with the filing of the voluntary petitions to commence these cases,the Debtors will be filing a number of First Day Motions. The Debtors anticipate that the
Bankruptcy Court will conduct a hearing within a business day or two after the commencement
of the cases (the First Day Hearing), during which the Bankruptcy Court will entertain the
arguments of counsel with respect to the relief sought in each of the First Day Motions.
36. Generally, the First Day Motions have been designed to meet the immediate goalsof (a) establishing procedures for the efficient administration of these Chapter 11 Cases; (b)
continuing the Debtors operations during these Chapter 11 Cases with as little disruption and
loss of productivity as possible; and (c) maintaining the confidence and support of the Debtors
key constituencies. I have reviewed each of the First Day Motions, including the exhibits,
attached thereto, and believe that the relief sought in each of the First Day Motions is narrowly
tailored to meet the goals described above and, ultimately, will be critical to the Debtors ability
to achieve success in these Chapter 11 Cases.
37. The First Day Motions are summarized below:A. Motion of the Debtors for Entry of an Order Authorizing and Directing the Joint
Administration of the Debtors Chapter 11 Cases for Procedural Purposes Only
38. By this motion, the Debtors request the joint administration of the Debtorsrelated chapter 11 cases for procedural purposes only. Specifically, the Debtors request that the
Court maintain one file and one docket for the Debtors cases under the PMGI Holdings Inc.
case and also request that the caption of their cases be modified to reflect the joint administration
of the cases.
4Capitalized terms used in Part III and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms
in the respective First Day Motions.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 16 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
17/63
NY 243288140v12 17
39. Blue Hen Group Inc.; Argus Payments Inc.; Big Island Technology Group, Inc.;Confirm ID, Inc.; Danni Ashe, Inc.; Fastcupid, Inc.; Fierce Wombat Games Inc.; FriendFinder
California Inc.; FRIENDFINDER VENTURES INC.; FRNK Technology Group; General Media
Art Holding, Inc.; General Media Communications, Inc.; General Media Entertainment, Inc.;
Global Alphabet, Inc.; GMCI Internet Operations, Inc.; GMI On-Line Ventures, Ltd.; Interactive
Network, Inc.; Magnolia Blossom Inc.; Medley.com Incorporated; NAFT NEWS
CORPORATION; Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc.; Penthouse Images Acquisitions,
Ltd.; PerfectMatch Inc.; Playtime Gaming Inc.; PMGI Holdings Inc.; PPM Technology Group,
Inc.; Pure Entertainment Telecommunications, Inc.; Sharkfish, Inc.; Snapshot Productions, LLC;
Streamray Inc.; Streamray Studios Inc.; Tan Door Media Inc.; Traffic Cat, Inc.; Transbloom,
Inc.; Various, Inc.; Video Bliss, Inc.; West Coast Facilities Inc.; and XVHUB Group Inc.
(collectively, the Subsidiaries) are direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of
FriendFinder Networks Inc., such that the Debtors constitute affiliates of one another within
the meaning of 11 U.S.C. 101(2).5 Joint administration of these cases (a) is warranted because
the Debtors financial affairs and business operations are closely related, and (b) will avoid the
unnecessary administrative burden on the Court and parties-in-interest in these Chapter 11 Cases.
40. Joint administration will permit the Clerk to use a single general docket for theDebtors Chapter 11 Cases and to combine notices to creditors and other parties-in-interest of the
Debtors respective estates. Joint administration also will protect parties-in-interest by ensuring
that such parties-in-interest in each of the Debtors respective Chapter 11 Cases will be apprised
of the various matters before the Court in each of the Chapter 11 Cases.
5Section 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code defines affiliate to include, in relevant part, a corporation 20 percent or
more of whose outstanding voting securities are directly or indirectly owned, controlled, or held with power to vote,by the debtor, or by an entity that directly or indirectly owns, controls, or holds with power to vote, 20 percent ormore of the outstanding voting securities of the debtor 11 U.S.C. 101(2).
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 17 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
18/63
NY 243288140v12 18
41. I understand that if the Court approves joint administration of the Debtors cases,the Debtors will be able to reduce fees and costs resulting from the administration of these
Chapter 11 Cases and ease the onerous administrative burden of having to file multiple
documents. I have also been advised that joint administration will ease the administrative burden
for the Court and all parties to these cases and obviate the need for duplicative notices, motions,
applications and orders, and thereby save time and expense for the Debtors and their estates.
42. Based on the foregoing, the Debtors believe that joint administration of the casesis in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates and all parties in interest, and should be
granted in all respects.
B. Motion of the Debtors for Entry of Interim and Final Orders Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 361, 362, 363, and 507 (I) Authorizing the Use of Cash Collateral, (II) Granting
Adequate Protection and (III) Scheduling a Final Hearing Pursuant to Bankruptcy
Rule 4001(b) and Local Rule 4001-2
43. By this motion, the Debtors request the Bankruptcy Courts approval of the use ofCash Collateral which is critical to the Debtors efforts to reorganize and maximize value for
their estates, employees and creditors.
1. Prepetition Secured Debt44. On the Petition Date, the Debtors were obligated on approximately
$565,124,621.50 million of secured debt financing plus certain interest, fees, costs, expenses and
other charges due in connection therewith pursuant to the Existing First Lien Notes, Cash Pay
Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.
45. Pursuant to the First Lien Indenture and the agreements, guarantees, documents,notes and instruments in respect therefore (as amended, the Existing First Lien Credit
Documents), the Issuers issued the Existing First Lien Notes which are guaranteed by the other
Debtors. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors were obligated to the First Lien Trustee and
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 18 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
19/63
NY 243288140v12 19
Collateral Agent and the holders of the Existing First Lien Notes (the First Lien Noteholders
and together with the First Lien Trustee and Collateral Agent, the Senior Secured Parties) in
the approximate principal amount (including the applicable prepayment premium) of
$234,297,907.80, plus all interest accrued thereon at the applicable default rate, plus all fees,
costs, expenses, and costs of collection (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys,
financial advisors and other professionals fees and expenses fees) as set forth in the Existing
First Lien Credit Documents, heretofore or hereafter incurred by the Senior Secured Parties in
connection therewith (the Senior Secured Parties Claim). The Debtors obligations in
respect of the Existing First Lien Credit Documents (collectively, the Prepetition First
Priority Obligations) are secured by liens against and security interests (the Prepetition First
Priority Liens) in substantially all of the assets of the Debtors (the Prepetition First Priority
Collateral), which liens were granted pursuant to certain Security Documents (as defined in the
First Lien Indenture) including, but not limited to, the Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as
of October 27, 2010, by and between the Debtors and the First Lien Trustee and Collateral
Agent, the Copyright Security Assignment, dated as of October 27, 2010, executed and delivered
by the Debtors to the First Lien Trustee and Collateral Agent, the Trademark Security
Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2010, executed and delivered by the Debtors to the First
Lien Trustee and Collateral Agent and certain account control agreements in favor of the First
Lien Trustee and Collateral Agent (as amended, collectively, the First Lien Security
Documents").
46. Pursuant to the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Indenture and all agreements,guarantees, documents, notes and instruments in respect therefore (as amended, the Non-Cash
Pay Credit Documents), the Issuers issued the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes which are
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 19 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
20/63
NY 243288140v12 20
guaranteed by the other Debtors. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors were obligated to the Non-
Cash Pay Second Lien Trustee and Collateral Agent and the holders of the Non-Cash Pay
Second Lien Notes (the Non-Cash Pay Noteholders and together with the Non-Cash Pay
Trustee and Collateral Agent, the Non-Cash Pay Secured Parties) in the approximate amount
of $320,254,296, plus all interest accrued thereon at the applicable default rate, plus all fees,
costs, expenses, and costs of collection (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys,
financial advisors and other professionals fees and expenses fees) as set forth in the Non-Cash
Pay Credit Documents, heretofore or hereafter incurred by the Non-Cash Pay Secured Parties in
connection therewith (the Non-Cash Pay Secured Parties Claim). The Debtors obligations
in respect of the Non-Cash Pay Credit Documents (collectively, the Non-Cash Pay Second
Priority Obligations) are secured by liens against and security interests (the Non-Cash Pay
Second Priority Liens) in substantially all of the assets of the Debtors (the Non-Cash Pay
Second Priority Collateral), which liens were granted pursuant to the Security Documents (as
defined in the Non-Cash Pay Indenture) including, but not limited to, the Security and Pledge
Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and between the Debtors and the Non-Cash Pay
Trustee and Collateral Agent, the Copyright Security Assignment, dated as of October 27, 2010,
executed and delivered by the Debtors to the Non-Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent, the
Trademark Security Agreement dated as of, October 27, 2010, executed and delivered by the
Debtors to the Non-Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent and certain account control
agreements in favor of the Non-Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent (as amended,
collectively, the Non-Cash Pay Security Documents").
47. Pursuant to the Cash Pay Second Lien Indenture and all agreements, documents,notes and instruments in respect therefore (as amended, the Cash Pay Credit Documents), the
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 20 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
21/63
NY 243288140v12 21
Issuers issued the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes which are guaranteed by the other Debtors. As
of the Petition Date, the Debtors were obligated to the Cash Pay Second Lien Trustee and
Collateral Agent and the holders of the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes (the Cash Pay
Noteholders and together with the Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent, the Non-Cash Pay
Secured Parties) in the approximate principal amount (including the applicable prepayment
premium) of $10,572,417.70, plus all interest accrued thereon at the applicable default rate, plus
all fees, costs, expenses, and costs of collection (including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys, financial advisors and other professionals fees and expenses fees) as set forth in the
Cash Pay Credit Documents, heretofore or hereafter incurred by the Cash Pay Secured Parties in
connection therewith (the Cash Pay Secured Parties Claim). The Debtors obligations in
respect of the Cash Pay Credit Documents (collectively, the Cash Pay Second Priority
Obligations) are secured by liens against and security interests (the Cash Pay Second
Priority Liens) in substantially all of the assets of the Debtors (the Cash Pay Second Priority
Collateral), which liens were granted pursuant to the Security Documents (as defined in the
Cash Pay Indenture) including, but not limited to, the Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as
of October 27, 2010, by and between the Debtors and the Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent,
the Copyright Security Assignment, dated as of October 27, 2010, executed and delivered by the
Debtors to the Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent, the Trademark Security Agreement dated
as of, October 27, 2010, executed and delivered by the Debtors to the Cash Pay Trustee and
Collateral Agent and certain account control agreements in favor of the Cash Pay Trustee and
Collateral Agent (as amended, collectively, the Cash Pay Security Documents").
48. Where applicable, the Prepetition First Priority Obligations, the Non-Cash PaySecond Priority Obligations and the Cash Pay Second Priority Obligations are collectively
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 21 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
22/63
NY 243288140v12 22
referred to as the Prepetition Secured Obligations; the First Lien Credit Documents, the
Non-Cash Pay Credit Documents and the Cash Pay Credit Documents are collectively referred to
as the Prepetition Credit Documents; the Senior Secured Parties, the Non-Cash Pay Secured
Parties and the Cash Pay Secured Parties are collectively referred to as the Secured Parties;
the Prepetition First Priority Collateral, the Non-Cash Pay Second Priority Collateral and the
Cash Pay Second Priority Collateral are collectively referred to as the Prepetition Collateral;
and the Prepetition First Priority Liens, the Non-Cash Pay Second Priority Liens and the Cash
Pay Second Priority Liens are collectively referred to as the Prepetition Liens.
2.
Intercreditor Agreements
49. Pursuant to that certain Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as ofOctober 27, 2010 (the Intercreditor Agreement) among the Debtors and the Trustees and
Collateral Agents (a) the Non-Cash Pay Secured Parties agree to subordinate their right to
payment under the Non-Cash Pay Credit Documents and (b) the Non-Cash Pay Secured Parties
and the Cash Pay Secured Parties agreed to subordinate their right to take enforcement action
under the Non-Cash Pay Security Documents and the Cash Pay Security Documents,
respectively, until the Prepetition First Priority Obligations have been paid in full on the terms
set forth in the Intercreditor Agreement.
50. The Non-Cash Pay Credit Documents and the Cash Pay Credit Documents aresubject to that certain Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement dated as of October 27, 2010
(the Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement) among the Debtors and each of the Non-Cash
Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent and the Cash Pay Trustee and Collateral Agent.
3. Use of Cash Collateral51. The availability to the Debtors of sufficient working capital, liquidity, and other
financial accommodations are vital to their ability to continue their operations. The Debtors do
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 22 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
23/63
NY 243288140v12 23
not have sufficient available sources of working capital and financing to carry on the normal
course operation of their businesses without use of the Cash Collateral. The Debtors ability to
maintain business relationships with their vendors, suppliers, and customers, and to finance their
day-to-day operations, is essential to the Debtors continued viability. In addition, the Debtors
need for use of Cash Collateral is critical and immediate. In the absence of the use of Cash
Collateral, the continued operation of the Debtors businesses would not be possible.
Accordingly, the Debtors and their estates would suffer immediate and irreparable harm unless
the Debtors are authorized to use Cash Collateral on the terms and conditions set forth herein and
in accordance with the Initial Budget. If the Debtors are not authorized to use Cash Collateral,
the Debtors businesses will shut down. The use of Cash Collateral, therefore, is critical to the
Debtors ability to operate their businesses going forward and to maximize the value of their
assets for the benefit of their creditors
52. Given the Debtors current financial condition, financing arrangements, andcapital structure, the Debtors have been unable to obtain financing from sources on terms more
favorable than provided for in Cash Collateral Motion and the Proposed Interim Order. The
Debtors likewise have been unable to obtain unsecured credit allowable under Section 364(b)(1)
of the Bankruptcy Code as an administrative expense.
53. The terms of the Cash Collateral arrangement described in the Motion werenegotiated by the parties in good faith and at arms length and the Debtors believe they are fair
and reasonable, reflect the Debtors exercise of prudent business judgment consistent with their
fiduciary duties, and are supported by reasonably equivalent value and fair consideration.
54. The Debtors do not have sufficient available sources of working capital andfinancing to operate their businesses or maintain their properties in the ordinary course of
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 23 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
24/63
NY 243288140v12 24
business without the authorized use of Cash Collateral. Absent obtaining use of Cash Collateral,
the Debtors businesses will be shut down, their ability to reorganize or realize going concern
value in their enterprises will be hindered, and serious and irreparable harm to the Debtors, their
estates and their creditors and equity holders will occur. The preservation and maintenance of
the Debtors businesses and their assets is necessary to maximize returns for all creditors, and is
significant and necessary to a successful resolution of these cases.
C. Motion of the Debtors for Entry of an Order (A) Authorizing the Maintenance ofBank Accounts and Continued Use of Existing Business Forms and Checks, (B)
Authorizing the Continued Use of Existing Cash Management System, (C) Waiving
Certain Investment and Deposit Guidelines, and (D) Granting Administrative
Expense Status to Postpetition Intercompany Claims
55. By this motion, the Debtors seek an order: (a) authorizing the maintenance ofBank Accounts and continued use of existing Business Forms; (b) authorizing, but not directing,
continued use of existing Cash Management System; (c) waiving certain of the investment and
deposit Guidelines set forth by the Office of the United States Trustee for the District of
Delaware; (d) granting administrative expense status to postpetition intercompany claims; and
(e) providing any additional relief required in order to effectuate the foregoing.
56. As described in the Cash Management Motion, the Debtors cash managementsystem is necessary not only for the efficient functioning of the Debtors business. For an
enterprise like the Debtors, whose operations are so highly dependent on their ability to manage
the high volume of cash receipts and cash disbursements received and made on a daily basis,
maintaining their existing cash management system is crucial.
57. Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, and in the ordinary course oftheir businesses, the Debtors maintained approximately 68 bank accounts (collectively, the
Bank Accounts). The Bank Accounts are part of a carefully constructed and highly-
automated cash management system (the Cash Management System) that ensures the
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 24 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
25/63
NY 243288140v12 25
Debtors ability to efficiently monitor and control their cash position. The Debtors Cash
Management System is maintained primarily with SunTrust Banks, Inc. (SunTrust), and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo). In addition, the Debtors maintain one account each
with HSBC Bank Brazil S.A. (HSBC Brazil), Commerzbank AG (Commerzbank) and
AtlasMont Banka AD Podgorica (AtlasMont), and two accounts with CaixaBank, S.A.
(Caixa). HSBC Brazil, Commerzbank, Caixa and AtlasMont are used in connection with
credit card transactions within the nations of Brazil, Germany, Spain and Serbia, respectively. 6
58. The Debtors utilize Wells Fargo and SunTrust for a majority of their bankingneeds. The Debtors Cash Management System is divided into two major parts and has been in
place since the Debtors acquired Various Inc. (Various) and its affiliates (collectively, the
West Coast Debtors) in December 2007 (the Various Acquisition). The West Coast
Debtors maintain operating accounts with Wells Fargo and cash receipts related to the West
Coast Debtors businesses are deposited into accounts with Wells Fargo. Those Debtors that
were part of the Debtors corporate family prior to the Various Acquisition (collectively, the
East Coast Debtors) maintain operating accounts with SunTrust and cash receipts related to
the East Coast Debtors businesses are deposited into accounts with SunTrust. The Debtors
Cash Management System as of the Petition Date is summarized as follows:
6In the normal course of business, more than ninety-seven percent (97%) of the Debtors total sales result from
credit card transactions. Similar to credit card transactions involving only the Debtors, certain of the Debtors non-
debtor affiliates (the Non-Debtor Affiliates) receive credit card payments, the cash proceeds of which are thentransferred to the Debtors. Specifically, certain merchant banks (collectively, the Credit Card Processors)process the Non-Debtor credit card transactions, chargebacks, discounts, and commissions resulting from purchasesmade from the Debtors websites and other businesses. The resulting funds are then reconciled by the Non-DebtorAffiliates, which then immediately transfer the funds to the bank account of the Debtor associated with theunderlying business transaction. Accordingly, as approximately sixty percent (60%) of the Debtors credit cardtransactions, chargebacks, discounts, and commissions are processed by the Non-Debtor Affiliates Credit CardProcessors, it is absolutely necessary to the Debtors business operations that the Non-Debtor Affiliates and theCredit Card Processors be permitted to continue to operate in the ordinary course of business.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 25 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
26/63
NY 243288140v12 26
a. SunTrust Accounts: The Debtors maintain 21 checking accounts (the SunTrustOperating Accounts) with SunTrust, which are utilized by the East CoastDebtors.7 Funds generated by the East Coast Debtors respective businesses,including, inter alia, print, media and certain websites, are deposited into eachEast Coast Debtors respective SunTrust Operating Account multiple times each
day. Deposits made into the SunTrust Operating Accounts include checks, wiretransfers, automatic clearinghouse (ACH) transfers, credit card payments8 andcash. Funds in the SunTrust Operating Accounts are primarily disbursed, on aweekly basis, by the East Coast Debtors to fund the operating expenses of eachEast Coast Debtor, respectively. These operating expenses include, inter alia,payroll and marketing. While each individual East Coast Debtor primarily fundsits own operations through its personal SunTrust Operating Account, the SunTrustOperating Accounts are used to fund the operational needs of all East CoastDebtors as needed. The Debtors also maintain four (4) Euro holding accounts(the SunTrust Euro Accounts) with SunTrust. Euro-denominated paymentsresulting from certain of the East Coast Debtors business operations are
deposited into the SunTrust Euro Accounts. The funds deposited into theSunTrust Euro Accounts are primarily used to pay the East Coast Debtors Euro-denominated expenses. Approximately five (5) times a year, the Debtors transfervarying sums from the SunTrust Euro Accounts to the SunTrust OperatingAccounts to cover the East Coast Debtors dollar-denominated expenses asneeded.
b. Wells Fargo Accounts: The Debtors maintain 28 checking accounts (the WellsFargo Operating Account) with Wells Fargo, which are utilized by the WestCoast Debtors.9 Funds generated by the West Coast Debtors respective website-based businesses are deposited into each West Coast Debtors respective WellsFargo Operating Account multiple times each day. Deposits made into the WellsFargo Operating Accounts include checks, wire transfers, ACH transfers, creditcard payments and cash. Funds in each respective Wells Fargo OperatingAccount are primarily disbursed, on a weekly basis, by the West Coast Debtors tofund the operating expenses of each West Coast Debtor, respectively. Suchoperating expenses include, inter alia, payroll, vendor, account holders and
7The SunTrust Operating Accounts are utilized respectively by the following East Coast Debtors: Video Bliss, Inc.;
General Media Communications, Inc.; Penthouse Digital Media Productions, Inc.; General Media Art Holding, Inc.;West Coast Facilities Inc.; Pure Entertainment Telecommunications, Inc.; GMCI Internet Operations, Inc.; GeneralMedia Entertainment, Inc.; PMGI Holdings Inc.; Penthouse Images Acquisitions, Ltd.; GMI On-Line Ventures,Ltd.; Interactive Network, Inc.; FriendFinder Networks Inc.; and Tan Door Media Inc.
8In the ordinary course of the Debtors business, credit card payments received by the Debtors are initially
processed by various merchant banks (credit card processors) which remit the processed funds to the appropriateDebtors bank account.
9The Wells Fargo Operating Accounts are utilized respectively by the following West Coast Debtors: Big Island
Technology Group, Inc.; Confirm ID, Inc.; Various; Global Alphabet, Inc.; Medley.com, Incorporated (Medley);PPM Technology Group, Inc.; Steamray, Inc.; Argus Payments Inc.; Fierce Wombat Games, Inc.; FriendFinderCalifornia Inc. (FF California); Fastcupid, Inc. (Fastcupid); PerfectMatch Inc. (PerfectMatch);PLAYTIME GAMING INC.; Magnolia Blossom Inc.; and NAFT NEWS CORPORATION.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 26 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
27/63
NY 243288140v12 27
marketing affiliate obligations. Further, VariousVarious Wells Fargo OperatingAccount functions as the West Coast Debtors primary operating account and isused to fund the operational expenses of other West Coast Debtors. Variousmaintains an average daily balance of $1,319,178.51 in its Wells Fargo OperatingAccount, with an average daily bank credit of $2,762,190.54 and an average daily
bank debit of $2,762,169.30. The West Coast Debtors also maintain six (6)payroll accounts (the Payroll Accounts) with Wells Fargo. The PayrollAccounts disburse payments to fund the West Coast Debtors bi-weekly payrollobligations and maintain a $1,000 minimum balance. The Payroll Accountsreceive weekly disbursements from the Wells Fargo Operating Accounts to fundpayroll for the West Coast Debtors. The West Coast Debtors also maintain four(4) sweep accounts (the Sweep Accounts) with Wells Fargo. The SweepAccounts function as savings accounts for the Wells Fargo Operating Accountsheld by Various, Medley, FriendFinder California Inc., and Fastcupid, Inc.(collectively, the Major Operating Accounts). Once a day, Major OperatingAccount funds exceeding a certain minimum amount (the Minimum
Amounts)
10
are swept into the Sweep Accounts. The swept funds remain in theSweep Accounts for one day and then are deposited back into the respectiveMajor Operating Account.
c. HSBC Account: The Debtors maintain a single checking account with HSBCBank (the HSBC Account). In order to process credit card payments in Brazil,the Debtors are required to maintain a bank account with a qualified Brazilianbank. Credit card transactions processed in Brazil in connection with theDebtors businesses, averaging approximately $1,363 per day, are deposited intothe HSBC Account multiple times each day. The HSBC Account is swept on adaily basis and maintains a $10,973 minimum balance in order to cover potentialcredit card chargebacks, credits and fees. The swept funds are deposited into theWells Fargo Operating Accounts.
d. Commerzbank Account: The Debtors maintain a single checking account withCommerzbank (the Commerzbank Account). Historically, in order to processcredit card payments in Germany, the Debtors were required to maintain a bankaccount with a qualified German bank. This is no longer required and theCommerzbank Account has not been used by the Debtors since August 2009.Currently, there is only $1,691 in the Commerzbank Account.
e. Caixa Accounts: The Debtors maintain two checking accounts with Caixa (theCaixa Accounts). In order to process credit card payments in Spain, theDebtors are required to maintain a bank account with a qualified Spanish bank.Credit card transactions processed in Spain in connection with the Debtorsbusinesses, averaging approximately $8,000 per day, are deposited into the CaixaAccounts multiple times each day. The Caixa Accounts are swept on a daily basis
10The Minimum Amounts are as follows: Various ($2,000,000 - $3,000,000); Medley ($150,000 - $420,000); FF
California ($0); and Fastcupid ($30,000).
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 27 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
28/63
NY 243288140v12 28
and maintain a $140,000 minimum balance in order to cover potential credit cardchargebacks, credits and fees. The swept funds are deposited into the WellsFargo Operating Account held by Various.
f. AtlasMont Account: The Debtors maintain a single checking account withAtlasMont (the AtlasMont Account). In order to process credit card paymentsin Serbia, the Debtors are required to maintain a bank account with a qualifiedSerbian bank. Credit card transactions processed in Serbia in connection with theDebtors businesses, averaging approximately (-$320) per day, are deposited intothe AtlasMont Account multiple times each day. The AtlasMont Account isswept on a daily basis and maintains a $0 minimum balance. The swept funds aredeposited into the Wells Fargo Operating Account held by Various.
59. Despite the separate banking structure of the East Coast Debtors and West CoastDebtors, the Debtors reconcile cash receipts, deposits and debits in the Cash Management
System on a daily basis, and perform a reconciliation of all of the Bank Accounts in the Cash
Management System once a month. The Debtors transition into chapter 11 will be significantly
less disruptive (and is required by some key agreements) if the Bank Accounts are maintained
following the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases with the same account numbers and,
where applicable, automated relationship. The Debtors further request authority to deposit funds
in and withdraw funds from all such accounts postpetition, subject to the same access rights and
limitations existing prior to the Petition Date, including, but not limited to, checks, wire
transfers, ACH, electronic funds transfers, and other debits and to treat the Bank Accounts for all
purposes as debtor-in-possession accounts.
60. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors use pre-printed check stock withthe relevant Debtors name printed thereon. In addition, the Debtors maintain pre-printed
correspondence and business forms, including, but not limited to, letterhead, envelopes,
promotional materials, and other business forms (collectively, along with the Debtors checks,
the Business Forms). To minimize administrative expense and delay, the Debtors request
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 28 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
29/63
NY 243288140v12 29
authority to continue to use their Business Forms substantially in the forms existing immediately
prior to the Petition Date, without reference to the Debtors Debtor-in-Possession status.
61. The Debtors maintain business relationships with each other that give rise tointercompany claims (the Intercompany Transactions). Among the Intercompany
Transactions, Various transfers approximately $1,250,000 a week to Medley, which Medley then
uses to pay for certain of the Debtors marketing expenses. Additionally, Various pays an
average of $60,000 a week on account employee health benefit obligations incurred by other
Debtors. Further, approximately twice a month, Various pays an average of $200,000 to certain
Debtors to fund the payroll obligations of other Debtors where that Debtor is unable to meet its
payroll obligation. Various also pays approximately $12,000 a month for PerfectMatchs
leasehold obligation related to commercial office space leased by PerfectMatch in Redman,
Washington.
62. Further, the Debtors have various Intercompany Transactions with non-debtors.Once a month, Debtor Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc. transfers an average of 25,000
(approximately $33,148) to NAFT MEDIA, S.L., a non-Debtor affiliate of the Debtors (NAFT
MEDIA). NAFT MEDIA uses these funds to pay its monthly bill from Telefnica S.A., which
provides essential satellite and video distribution services for NAFT MEDIA.
63. The Debtors maintain records of its Intercompany Transactions, including fundtransfers, and thus can ascertain, trace and account for Intercompany Transactions. The Debtors
reconcile all Intercompany Transactions on a monthly basis. The Debtors will continue to
maintain records and appropriately reconcile all Intercompany Transactions postpetition.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 29 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
30/63
NY 243288140v12 30
D. Motion of the Debtors for Entry of an Order (A) Authorizing Debtors to Pay (I) AllPrepetition Employee Obligations, and (II) Prepetition Withholding Obligations,
and (B) Directing Banks to Honor Related Transfers
64. In order to enable the Debtors to maintain morale during this critical time, retaintheir current Employees, Account Holders and Independent Service Providers, and minimize the
personal hardship such Employees, Account Holders and Independent Service Providers may
suffer if prepetition employee-related obligations are not paid when due or honored as expected,
the Debtors seek authority, in their discretion, to pay and honor, as the case may be, (a) all
prepetition claims of Employees, including, but not limited to, claims for Wages and certain
costs and disbursements related to the foregoing, up to the statutory cap of $12,425 per
Employee, (b) any claims or payments pursuant to the Employee Benefit Plans, (c) all prepetition
federal and state Withholding Obligations (collectively, the Employee Obligations) and (d) all
prepetition claims of Account Holders for Distributions and (e) all prepetition claims for
Independent Service Providers.
1. Employees65. The Debtors employ individuals in five locationsnamely: (i) New York, (ii)
Florida, (iii) California, (iv) Nevada and (v) Taiwan. The Debtors have a total of approximately
435 employees (the Employees). Out of the total 435 employees, approximately 15 are part
time workers and 420 are full time workers. In addition, approximately 300 of the Employees
are salaried employees and 135 are hourly.
66. The Debtors also have approximately 4,000 account holders who perform on theDebtors internet websites for customers and members on an independent basis (the Account
Holders). The Debtors utilize an in-house team to manage the Account Holders. The Account
Holders perform on a daily to weekly basis and provide entertainment services to the Debtors
customers and members. The Account Holders have cultivated relationships with customers and
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 30 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
31/63
NY 243288140v12 31
members that may span many years, and as a result, the customers and members are extremely
loyal to the Account Holders and entertainment provided by the Debtors. The Debtors estimate
that a majority of its sales for its entertainment sector take place through their Account Holder
structure. If the Debtors are unable to continue to pay the Account Holders (in accordance with
the terms described below), the Debtors will lose the services of the Account Holders, their
institutional knowledge and their relationships with the Debtors customers. If the Debtors were
not longer to utilize the services of the Account Holders the Debtors sales would collapse.
Therefore, the Account Holders are a critical component of the Debtors ability to obtain new
customers and maintain long-term customers.
67. In addition to the Employees and the Account Holders, the Debtors also haveagreements with fifty-two (52) additional independent contractors that provide services that are
imperative to the Debtors ongoing business operations, including providing assistance with
collections and maintaining the Debtors websites (the Independent Service Providers). If
the Debtors are unable to pay the Independent Service Providers, they will lose the services of
the Independent Service Providers, their institutional knowledge and the Debtors business
operations will be severely compromised.
2. Wages, Salaries and Payroll Obligations68. All Employees are paid hourly wages or salary (collectively, the Wages) every
other Friday (the Pay Date) for the two-week period prior to the week ending in the Pay Date.
Due to the Debtors various operating businesses, the Debtors operate five different payroll
systems. For example, in July 2013, Employees paid by several of the Debtors were paid on July
5, 2013 and July 19, 2013 (such schedule, an A Payroll). Alternatively, in July 2013,
Employees paid by other Debtor entities were paid on July 12, 2013 and July 26, 2013 (such
schedule, a B Payroll). In addition, the Debtors pay their Employees in Taiwan once a month,
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 31 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
32/63
NY 243288140v12 32
on the tenth day of the following month (such schedule, a C Payroll). Payroll averages
approximately $1,500,000.00 per month in the aggregate, including the Debtors portion of the
Payroll Taxes (as defined below). Approximately 70% of the Employees are paid through
electronic fund transfers, i.e. direct deposit, while the remaining 30% of the Employees are paid
by physical checks.
69. The Debtors last regular payroll dates were as follows: A Payroll September13, 2013; B-Payroll September 6, 2013, C-Payroll September 10, 2013 for the prior payroll
period. The next payroll dates are scheduled as follows: A Payroll September 27, 2013, B
Payroll September 20, 2013, and C Payroll on or about October 10, 2013. The Debtors
estimate that, as of the Petition Date, approximately $1,389,250 in Wages and Salaries has
accrued and is owed to their Employees, with no Employees owed in excess of $12,425.
70. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) processes payments for A Payroll andB Payroll for the Debtors. The Debtors pay ADP a total of approximately $15,000 per month on
account of payroll administration and certain other payroll related services. The Debtors
estimate that there are no accrued and unpaid costs in connection with ADP. The Debtors
request the authority to continue pay the approximately $15,000 monthly fee in the ordinary
course of business.
71. The Account Holders receive bimonthly distributions which are directly tied tothe sales generated by the Account Holder; generally an Account Holder receives approximately
30% of each sale (Distribution). The Debtors typically collect approximately 70% of the
sales generated by the Account Holders. On average, the Account Holders receive an aggregate
amount of approximately $2.5 million per month in Distributions. The Debtors estimate that, as
of the Petition Date approximately $35,000 has accrued and is owed to the Account Holders.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 32 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
33/63
NY 243288140v12 33
The Account Holders are also entitled to certain bonus payments associated with contests run on
the Debtors websites. In addition, the Account Holders receive a referral bonus for referring
new Account Holders to the Debtors businesses. The Debtors request authority to pay all
prepetition amounts owing to the Account Holders for their services, and to continue to pay such
amounts in the ordinary course of business and consistent with their business practices.
72. The Independent Service Providers receive monthly payments for their services.The Debtors estimate that, as of the Petition Date approximately $65,000 has accrued and is
owed to the Independent Service Providers. The Debtors request authority to pay all prepetition
amounts owing to the Independent Service Providers for their services, and to continue to pay
such amounts in the ordinary course of business and consistent with their business practices.
73. The Debtors, as employers, are required by law to withhold federal, state andlocal taxes from Wages and Salaries for remittance to appropriate tax authorities (the Employee
Taxes). In addition, the Debtors are required to pay, from their own funds, the social security
and Medicare taxes and pay, based on a percentage of gross payroll and subject to state-imposed
limits, additional amounts for state and federal unemployment insurance (together with the
Employee Taxes, the Payroll Taxes) and remit the same to the appropriate authorities
(collectively, the Taxing Authorities). For Employees, the Debtors pay Payroll Taxes to
various Taxing Authorities in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and applicable state
law. The Debtors average two-week total obligation for Payroll Taxes is approximately
$600,000. The Debtors seek authority to honor and process the prepetition obligations with
respect to the Payroll Taxes.
3. Vacation Time and Sick/Personal Days74. Unless otherwise provided for in an Employment Agreement, Employees receive
paid personal time off (PTO Days) based on their length of service. Eligible Employees
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 33 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
34/63
NY 243288140v12 34
accrue PTO Days in hourly increments at a rate dependent upon that Employees years of
continual service (the Accrual Rate). Part-time Employees (employees regularly scheduled to
work less than 40 hours but at least 30 hours) accrue PTO Days at one-half (1/2) the rate that
full-time employees accrue PTO Dates. Employees who are regularly scheduled to work less
than 30 hours a week are not eligible for PTO Days. The Debtors have established a maximum
amount of PTO Days that an Employee may accrue (the Accrual Cap), which is presently set
at 1.5 times the Employees Accrual Rate. The Accrual Cap is dependent upon the years of
continual employment with the Company. The Accrual Cap for an Employee who has been
employed: (i) less than four (4) years is 30 PTO Days, (ii) between five (5) and seven (7) years is
38 PTO Days, (iii) more than eight (8) years is 45 PTO Days. Once an employee reaches their
Accrual Cap, the Employee will cease accruing PTO Days until the employee uses sufficient
PTO Days to fall below their Accrual Cap.
75. The Debtors do not offer vacation or sick days; however, PTO Days may be usedfor vacation, personal time, or illness. Accrued, unused paid time off is paid out upon separation
from the company. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that they owe an aggregate
amount of approximately $2.124 million for accrued PTO Days. The Debtors request authority
to continue to honor their PTO Days policies in the ordinary course of business, and to honor all
prepetition obligations related thereto in a manner consistent with their prepetition practices.
4. Employee Benefit Plans76. In the ordinary course of business, and as is customary for companies of their
size, the Debtors maintain various employee benefits and policies that provide their Employees
with medical, dental, disability insurance, and other benefits which are described in more detail
below (collectively, the Employee Benefit Plans). Some of the Employee Benefit Plans are
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 34 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
35/63
NY 243288140v12 35
fully funded by the Employees, and others are funded either partially or fully through
contributions made by the Debtors.
a. Medical/Dental/Vision Plans77. The Debtors offer their Employees a traditional health insurance plan
administered by Aetna Life Insurance Company (the Employee Health Plan). With respect to
the Employee Health Plan, the Debtors pay health insurance claims via electronic transfer when
the issued claims total $20,000 or more, with a monthly closeout payment made on the first
banking of each month for the remaining balance one month in arrears. In addition, the Debtors
have a stop loss carrier for the Employee Health Plan, Aetna Life Insurance Company (Aetna),
who covers any claims over $150,000 (individual claims) $4,135,008.96 (aggregate). On
average, the Debtors incur an annual aggregate cost of approximately $3.4 million in connection
with the Employee Health Plan. The Debtors pay a monthly premium of approximately
$250,000 in connection with the Employee Health Plan. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors
estimate that the accrued and unpaid costs for the Employee Health Plan is approximately
$200,000 for all of its Employees.
78. The Debtors also offer a dental plan administered by Aetna Life InsuranceCompany (the Dental Plan). The Dental Plan is self-funded by the Debtors and the
Employees. The Debtors pay approximately $25,000 monthly premium and the Employees
contribute approximately $5,000 to the monthly premium, which the Debtors deduct directly
from the participating Employees paychecks.
79. In addition, the Debtors offer a vision plan to their Employees administered byVision Service Plan (the Vision Plan). The Vision Plan is a fully insured plan and no claims
are processed, accrued for or paid for by the Debtor, however the Debtors pay approximately
$800 per month. The Employees contribute approximately $3,000 per month, which the Debtors
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 35 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
36/63
NY 243288140v12 36
deduct directly from the participating Employees paychecks. As of the Petition Date, the
Debtors estimate that they owe approximately $22,260 for the accrued and unpaid monthly
premiums of the Dental and Vision Plans.
b. Other Insurance Plans80. The Debtors offer various short-term disability insurance plans to the Employees
which are fully funded by the participating Employees, including short-term and long-term
disability insurance. In addition, the Debtors provide a group term life insurance (the Group
Term Life Insurance) which provides for one time the Employees annual salary, not to
exceed $50,000 for all full-time employees. The Debtors also offer a short term disability policy
(the Short Term Disability Insurance) to all Employees that are not located in New York and
Florida which includes an Accidental Death and Dismemberment benefit. The Debtors pay
approximately $1,000 per month in the aggregate for the Group Term Life Insurance and
approximately $1,000 per month in the aggregate for the Short Term Disability Insurance. The
Debtors offer voluntary life insurance and dependent life insurance in addition to the basic life
insurance, along with additional accidental death and dismemberment insurance and long term
disability and employees bear the premium costs (which vary depending on age, amount of
coverage elected, or other factors). As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate the amount of
accrued and unpaid costs for the Group Term Life Insurance to be $935 and for Short Term
Disability Insurance to be $805. The Debtors seek authority to pay all prepetition amounts owed
on account of the Basic Life Insurance and to continue their prepetition practices with respect to
such benefit.
c. Workers Compensation Insurance81. Under the applicable law, the Debtors are required to maintain workers
compensation insurance programs to provide their Employees with workers compensation
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 36 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
37/63
NY 243288140v12 37
insurance coverage for claims arising from or related to their employment with the Debtors and
to satisfy the Debtors obligations arising under or related to these programs (collectively, the
Workers Compensation Programs). The Workers Compensation Programs cover all
Employees in the United States and are administered primarily through workers compensation
insurance policies with the Insurance Company of Pennsylvania and Chartis, Inc. The Debtors
pay an aggregate annual premium of approximately $130,000.00 on account of the Workers
Compensation Programs. It is critical that the Debtors be permitted to continue their workers
compensation insurance. In addition, failure to maintain this insurance in the various states in
which the Debtors do business could result in the institution of administrative or legal
proceedings against the Debtors and their officers and directors and an inability of the Debtors to
continue as a going concern. The Debtors request authority to pay any and all prepetition
amounts due or that may become due with respect to the Workers Compensation Programs. The
Debtors further seek authority to maintain and continue their prepetition practices with respect to
the Workers Compensation Programs, including, among other things, allowing workers
compensation claimants, to the extent they hold valid claims, to proceed with their claims under
the Workers Compensation Programs.
d. Retirement Plan82. Employees who are 21 years of age or older are eligible to enroll in a 401(k) plan
(the Retirement Plan) on the first month on or after they meet the eligibility requirements.
Employees may contribute to the Retirement Plan through salary deferrals and may contribute up
to the IRS limit each year. The Debtors make matching contributions at the end of each pay
period, generally equal to 100% of the Employees elective deferral up to the IRS limit; however
the Debtors do not make contributions which exceed 4% of the Employees compensation.
Employees are always 100% vested in their personal contributions and cannot forfeit the
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 37 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
38/63
NY 243288140v12 38
contributions. Employees are vested in the Debtors contributions over time based on length of
employment. The Retirement Plan is administered by Securian Financial Group (Securian)
and the Retirement Plan runs consistent with the calendar year. On average, the Debtors remit
approximately $60,000 monthly directly to Securian to match the contributions of their
Employees. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors believe that the aggregate amount of accrued
but unpaid matching contributions under the Retirement Plan is approximately $30,000. The
Debtors seek authority to continue to honor and make funding contributions to the Retirement
Plan in the ordinary course of business.
e.
Flexible Spending
83. The Debtors offer their Employees the ability to contribute a portion of theircompensation, which amounts are generally deducted automatically from each participating
Employee's paycheck, into flexible spending accounts for health and dependent care (the
Flexible Spending Program). Approximately 120 Employees participate in the Flexible
Spending Program, for which the Debtors pay approximately $750 per month to administer. The
Debtors estimate that are no accrued and unpaid costs in connection with administration of the
Flexible Spending. The Debtors seek authority to continue their prepetition practices with
respect to the Flexible Spending Program.
f. Expense Reimbursement84. The Debtors have a formal policy whereby their Employees seek reimbursement
of business-related expenses. The Debtors reimburse Employees on a weekly basis for certain
ordinary course expenses incurred within the scope of the Employees employment, including
travel, lodging, transportation, meals, cell phone bills, fax charges and other miscellaneous
expenses (collectively, the Business Expenses). All reimbursement requests must be
submitted to the AP department by means of an approved expense report along with the receipts.
Case 13-12404-CSS Doc 16 Filed 09/17/13 Page 38 of 60
7/29/2019 PMGI First Day Decl
39/63
NY 243288140v12 39
The Debtors average weekly Business Expenses are approximately $20,000, and are paid in full
in the normal course of business, but usually not later than two weeks after submission of
approved expense forms. Although the Debtors encouraged the submission of reimbursement
requests prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors anticipate that many Employees will ha