+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PMS Chap 1

PMS Chap 1

Date post: 16-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: gueigun
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 33

Transcript
  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    1/33

    PERFORMANCE

    MANAGEMENT

    Herman Aguinis

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

    PERFORMANCE

    MANAGEMENT

    Herman Aguinis

    Prentice Hall Inc. 2006

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    2/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Performance anagement in Conte!t"

    #vervie$

    Definition of Performance Management (PM) The Performance Management Contribution

    Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PMsystemsDefinition of Reard !ystems"ims and role of PM !ystems

    Characteristics of an #deal PM system #ntegration ith $ther %uman Resources and

    Development "ctivities

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    3/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Performance anagement" Definition

    Continuous Process of#dentifying performance of individuals and teams

    Measuring performance of individuals and teams

    Developing performance of individuals and teams

    and

    "ligning performance ith the strategic goals of the

    organi&ation

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    4/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    P is %#& 'erformance a''raisal

    PM !trategic business

    considerations

    $ngoing feedbac'

    !o employee can

    improve performance

    Driven by line manager

    Performance

    a''raisal "ssesses employee

    !trengths

    ea'nesses

    $nce a year

    *ac's ongoing feedbac'

    Driven by %R

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    5/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Contri(utions of P

    )or *m'loyees

    The definitions of +ob and success are clarified

    Motivation to perform is increased

    !elf-esteem is increased

    !elf-insight and development and enhanced

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    6/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Contri(utions of P

    )or anagers

    !upervisors, vies of performance are

    communicated more clearly

    Managers gain insight about subordinates

    There is better and more timely differentiation

    beteen good and poor performers

    mployees become more competent

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    7/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Contri(utions of P

    )or #rgani+ationH- )unction

    $rgani&ational goals are made clear

    $rgani&ational change is facilitated

    "dministrative actions are more fair and

    appropriate

    There is better protection from lasuits

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    8/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    DisadvantagesDangers ofPoorlyim'lemented P /ystems

    for *m'loyees *oered self-esteem

    mployee burnout and +ob dissatisfaction

    Damaged relationships

    .se of false or misleading information

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    9/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    DisadvantagesDangers ofPoorlyim'lemented P /ystems

    for anagers #ncreased turnover

    Decreased motivation to perform

    .n+ustified demands on managers, resources

    arying and unfair standards and ratings

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    10/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    asted time and money

    .nclear ratings system

    merging biases

    #ncreased ris' of litigation

    DisadvantagesDangers ofPoorlyim'lemented P /ystems

    for #rgani+ation

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    11/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Pur'oses of P /ystems"

    #vervie$

    !trategic

    "dministrative

    #nformational

    Developmental

    $rgani&ational maintenance

    Documentation

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    12/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    /trategic Pur'ose

    *in' employee behavior ith organi&ation,s

    goals

    Communicate most crucial business strategic

    initiatives

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    13/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Administrative Pur'ose

    Provide information for ma'ing decisions re0!alary ad+ustments

    Promotions

    Retention or termination

    Recognition of individual performance

    *ayoffs

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    14/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Informational Pur'ose

    Communicate to mployees0

    1pectations

    hat is important

    %o they are doing

    %o to improve

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    15/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Develo'mental Pur'ose

    Performance feedbac'/coaching

    #dentification of individual strengths and

    ea'nesses

    Causes of performance deficiencies

    Tailor development of individual career path

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    16/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    #rgani+ational aintenance Pur'ose

    Plan effective or'force

    "ssess future training needs

    valuate performance at organi&ational level

    valuate effectiveness of %R interventions

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    17/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Documentational Pur'ose

    alidate selection instruments

    Document administrative decisions

    %elp meet legal re2uirements

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    18/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Caracteristics of an Ideal P /ystem

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    19/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Congruent $it organi+ational strategy

    Consistent ith organi&ation,s strategy

    "ligned ith unit and organi&ational goals

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    20/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    &oroug

    "ll employees are evaluated

    "ll ma+or +ob responsibilities are evaluated

    valuations cover performance for entirerevie period

    3eedbac' is given on both positive and

    negative performance

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    21/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Practical

    "vailable

    asy to use

    "cceptable to decision ma'ers

    4enefits outeigh costs

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    22/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    eaningful

    !tandards are important and relevant

    !ystem measures $5*6 hat employee cancontrol

    Results have conse2uences valuationsoccur regularly and at appropriate times

    !ystem provides for continuing s'ill

    development of evaluators

    ifi

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    23/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    /'ecific

    Concrete and detailed guidance to

    employees

    hat,s e1pected

    ho to meet the e1pectations

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    24/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Identifies effective and ineffective 'erformance

    Distinguish beteen effective and ineffective 4ehaviors

    Results

    Provide ability to identify employees ith

    various levels of performance

    - li (l

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    25/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    -elia(le

    Consistent

    3ree of error

    #nter-rater reliability

    1 lid

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    26/33Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    1alid

    Relevant (measures hat is important)

    5ot deficient (doesn,t measure unimportant

    facets of +ob)

    5ot contaminated (only measures hat the

    employee can control)

    A t (l d ) i

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    27/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Acce'ta(le and )air

    Perception of Distributive 7ustice

    or' performedevaluation receivedreard

    Perception of Procedural 7ustice

    3airness of procedures used to0 Determine ratings

    *in' ratings to reards

    I l i

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    28/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Inclusive

    Represents concerns of all involved hen system is created8 employees should help

    ith deciding

    hat should be measured %o it should be measured

    mployee should provide input on performance

    prior to evaluation meeting

    # % / t 3

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    29/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    #'en %o /ecrets3

    3re2uent8 ongoing evaluations and feedbac'

    9-ay communications in appraisal meeting

    Clear standards8 ongoing communication Communications are factual8 open8 honest

    C t (l

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    30/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    Correcta(le

    Recogni&es that human +udgment is fallible

    "ppeals process provided

    /t d di d

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    31/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    /tandardi+ed

    $ngoing training of managers to provide

    Consistent evaluations across

    People

    Time

    i l

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    32/33

    Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall Inc. 2006

    *tical

    !upervisor suppresses self-interest

    !upervisor rates only here she has sufficient

    information about the performance dimension

    !upervisor respects employee privacy

    Integration $it oter Human -esources

  • 7/23/2019 PMS Chap 1

    33/33

    Integration $it oter Human -esources

    and Develo'ment activities

    PM provides information for0

    Development of training to meet organi&ational

    needs

    or'force planning

    Recruitment and hiring decisions

    Development of compensation systems


Recommended