Date post: | 27-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dale-simmons |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Functional Physical Competence Testing – The Challenges
John HendersonDirector of Physical & Health EducationOccupational Health & Well-being September 2010
“Assaults on PSNI rise by 33% in just four years”
(2,928 incidents)
“ I couldn’t breathe. But he kept on kicking me and punching me.”
“It’s treated as a sport, says officer beaten up by a drunk.”
SpeedPower
Coordination Reaction Time
Strength
Motor skills
Aerobic Endurance
Anaerobic Endurance
Nutrition
Flexibility
What physical competencies are required to be an operational police officer ?
• Walk, Run, Jump, Climb, Balance,Crawl, Weave, Lift, Carry, Drag, Push and Pull
• Created the PSNI Physical Competence Assessment from these competencies
OBJECTIVE UNDERPINNING DESIGN PROCESS
“To design a valid, reliable and fair procedure that
could be used to assess an individuals’ actual or
inherent ability to perform the tasks involved in police
duties”
PSNI Concept of Physical Competence: Job-Related
1. Task Analysis
2. Identified Core Physical Competencies
3. Designed an assessment
The Structured Interviews - sampling and participation:
538 participants were selected at random from 2,730.
80% of all females were selected to attend.
Of these,
368 officers (230 males and 138 females)
representing 68% of the target sample took part in the study.
What steps were involved in developing a interview framework for data collection?
Prepare and validate a job description that defines the full range of duties that PSNI regular officers perform
Prepare and validate a list of physical activities that Officers may be required to perform
Mobile patrols Vehicle check point Beat patrolsJoint Army patrolsSearching AccidentsBrawls Public orderArrestsRural route checksMaintenance
The agenda for structured interview...
Participants asked to select tasks from the job description, which had been performed during the previous month, and to identify:
the physical activities involved.
the amount of each activity.
the perceived effort.
Lifting Stair-climbing
Climbing Jumping
Crawling
Pushing/Pulling BalancingWeavingCarryingDragging
Running
Physical activities most frequently recorded...
CONTENT & STANDARD OF PHYSICAL COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT (PCA)
1. Circuit Embodies job related tasks performed in succession
within a time limit which reflects a sense of urgency Standard: 3m 43sec
2. Push-Pull Requires subject to generate physical force in a
controlled environment. Standard: 26kgf
1. The validity of the PCA.
2. The appropriateness of the standards.
3. The efficacy of the assessment process.
4. The legal impact.
5. To consider the JRFT as an alternative. (Home Office test)
Scope of the Independent Review
OUTCOME OF REVIEW
Recommended:
► A new time standard for the circuit (3min 43sec)
►Rejected the adoption of the JRFT on both scientific & legal grounds
►Minor modifications to the Push/Pull machine and a new standard (26kgf)
Confirmed:
► Validity of the circuit content & push/pull system
Why assess the ability to generate force?
•The necessity to apply force was found to be a critical job-related task.
• Particularly associated with officer safety during a physical confrontation.
• The 'push-pull element' was designed to assess the capability to perform a range of tasks involving pushing and pulling.
1. Handle height.
2. Slide length.
3. Isokinetic test speed.
4. Test standard.
Analysis of Key Parameters
Mean force versus handle height (m)
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
1.20 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.28 1.30
Handle height (m)
Kg
fo
rce
1.251.21 1.291.23
Mean force versus handle height (m)
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
1.20 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.28 1.30
Handle height (m)
Kg
fo
rce
Height range 1.62-1.69 m Height range 1.70-1.77 m
Height range 1.78-1.85 m Height range 1.86-1.94 m
1.21
“Starting with toes behind the line, feet shoulder width apart, step forward into a strong and balanced position keeping the chest facing forwards”
Old length: 0.85m
New length: 0.70m
2. Slide Length
Mean force at 1.25 m handle height
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.70 0.85Slide Range (m)
kg
fo
rce
Mean force at 1.21 m handle height
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.70 0.85Slide Range (m)
kg
fo
rce
Mean force at 1.21 m handle height
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1.62-1.69 m 1.70-1.77 m 1.78-1.85 m 1.86-1.94 m
kg
fo
rce
Slide range = 0.70 m Slide range = 0.85 m
3. Slide Speed (40Hz)
• The push-pull machine provides maximal resistance through a full range of movement, allowing the active muscles to apply maximal force over each phase of movement.
• Isokinetic testing means the speed remains constant throughout the movement no matter how much force is exerted.
• This method of assessment is safe and reliable.
Mean force versus sliding speed (Hz)
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
35.0
37.5
40.0
25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Hertz
Kg
fo
rce
Mean force versus sliding speed (Hz)
10
20
30
40
50
25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Hertz
Kg
fo
rce
Height range 1.58 - 1.64 m Height range 1.65 - 1.71 m
Height range 1.72 - 1.77 m Height range 1.78 - 1.86 m
Statistic Mean Force in Kgf
Mean 40
SD 10
Min 25
Max 64
Percentile Rankings
95th 59
50th 40
5th 26
Recommended Standard 26 kgf
4. Push-Pull Test Standard
Statistic Circuit Time (s)
Mean 190
SD 21
Min 159
Max 259
Percentile Rankings
95th 163
50th 190
5th 223
Recommended Standard 3m 43s
4. Circuit Test Standard
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
Height (m)
Cir
cu
it t
ime
(s
ec
on
ds
)
914 males
370 females
What is the effect of height on circuit time ?
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Weight (kg)
Cir
cu
it t
ime
(se
co
nd
s)
914 males
370 females
What is the effect of weight on circuit time ?
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Age (years)
Cir
cu
it t
ime
(se
co
nd
s)
914 males
370 females
What is the effect of age on circuit time ?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
Height (m)
Pu
sh
-pu
ll f
orc
e (
kg
f)
914 males
370 females
What is the effect of height on push-pull ability ?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Weight (kg)
Pu
sh-p
ull
fo
rce
(kg
f)
914 males
370 females
What is the effect of weight on push-pull ability ?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Age (years)
Pu
sh
-pu
ll f
orc
e (
kg
f)
914 males
370 females
What is the effect of age on push-pull ability ?
Outcomes 2003/2010
• Decision taken to introduce regular in-service medical and fitness screening.
• Employed 3900 (no entry test – except for medical appeals).
• Dismissed 28 student officers (26F/2M)
and 2 (F) probationer officers 2003/2010.
EQUALITY LEGISLATION
Test must be:
Job-Related (correspond to a real need)
Inherent Activities
Gender Neutral
Can’t Overtest or Undertest (appropriate & necessary)
Remember: Indirect discrimination is not illegal
• Applicant• Respondent• Justifiability• Disparate Impact• Proportionate to Need• Intentionality
LEGAL TERMS
Legal Challenge Dougan V Chief Constable
• PSNI accepted the PCA indirectly discriminates against females
Tribunal required the PSNI to:
• justify the need for the test
• prove the discrimination was proportionate to needs
• prove there was no intention to discriminate
Legal Justification to apply a test
Circuit Content
Push/Pull Content & Standard
Circuit time not sufficiently justified
X
TRIBUNAL FINDINGSTRIBUNAL FINDINGS
Disparate impact on females acceptable as it justified
We lost the case because the court said we had failed to justify the standard of the circuit element but we won the remedies hearing
Let’s look at what the court said
Joanne Dougan vs. The Chief Constable - 2001
Joanne Dougan vs. The Chief Constable
“ …..court accepted that it was correct to involve in-service officers in the decision making process. The mistake was made by not returning to consult after a decision was made.”
“ ..tribunal is in no doubt that the police service was
correct not to adopt gymnasium/laboratory tests but
rather to use purpose-designed job related
assessments based on abilities and work patterns
required for safe and efficient job performance.”
Joanne Dougan vs. The Chief Constable
“ the Court is satisfied the introduction of a job-related
PCA was justifiable…..also satisfied the respondent had
shown the circuit and the push-pull device were justified
and non discriminatory.”
Joanne Dougan vs. The Chief Constable
“…no dispute that with gender neutral tests such as
these there would be differences between male and
female times …..but both are required to do the same
job.”
Joanne Dougan vs. The Chief Constable
“..only because the PCA had the same standard for male
and female and given the tribunal fully recognised the
physiological differences there was clearly scope for a
discriminatory effect to exist.”
Joanne Dougan vs. The Chief Constable
**
“….if you sit by the river bank long enough
the body of your enemy will float past”
Remember the old Chinese Proverb