Date post: | 15-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | videoaakash15 |
View: | 1,449 times |
Download: | 0 times |
IS
LM
Macroeconomic equilibrium and policy
Income, Output Y
Inte
rest ra
tei
Y*
i*
The intersection of IS and
LM represents the
simultaneous equilibrium on
the goods and the money
market…
…For a given value of
government spending G,
taxes T, money supply M
and prices P
Macroeconomic equilibrium and policy
• IS-LM can be used to assess the impact of exogenous shocks on the endogenous variables of the model (interest rates and output)
• One can also evaluate the effectiveness of the policy mix, i.e. the combination of:– Fiscal policy: changes to government spending
and taxes
– Monetary policy: changes to money supply
Policy in the IS-LM Model
• Fiscal Policy
– Expansionary fiscal policy shifts the IS
curve to the right
– Contractionary fiscal policy shifts the IS
curve to the left
• Monetary Policy
– Expansionary monetary policy shifts
the LM curve to the right
– Contractionary monetary policy shifts
the LM curve to the left
Fiscal Policy, the Interest Rate and the IS
Curve
• Fiscal contraction: a fiscal policy that reduces the budget deficit.
– Reducing G or increasing T
• Fiscal expansion: increasing the budget deficit.
– Increasing G or decreasing T
• Taxes (T) and government expenditures (G) affect the IS curve, not the LM curve.
Monetary Policy, the Interest Rate, and
the LM Curve
• Monetary contraction (tightening)
refers to a decrease in the money
supply.
• An increase in the money supply is
called monetary expansion.
• Monetary policy affects only the LM
curve, not the IS curve.
Policy Analysis with
the IS-LM Model
A Closer Look at Policy
• Fiscal Policy and Crowding Out
• Monetary Policy and the Liquidity Trap
Real World Monetary and Fiscal Policy
Fiscal Crowding Out1. The multiplier is 2 and
government spending increases by
$500, so the IS increases by $1000.
$6600
IS0
LM
Aggregate Output
IS1
$1000
4%
$6000
5%
$7000
2. The increase in income
increases money demand
which increases interest
rates from 4% to 5%.
3. The increase in the interest
rate causes a decrease in
investment so that the increase
in income is only $600, less that
the full multiplier effect.
Fiscal Policy and Crowding Out
• When government expenditures increase or taxes are reduced, output and income begin to increase.
• The increase in income increases the demand for money.
• The increase in money demand increases the interest rate.
• Higher interest rates cause a decrease in investment, offsetting some of the expansionary effect of the increase in government spending.
Full Crowding Out1. The multiplier is 2 and
government spending increases by
$500, so the IS increases by $1000. 2. If the demand for money
is totally insensitive to the
interest rate, the interest rate
increases from 4% to 9%.
3. The increase in the interest
rate causes a decrease in
investment that completely offsets
the increase in government spending.
IS0
LM
Aggregate Output
IS1
$1000
4%
$6000
9%
$7000
Ineffective Fiscal Policy
• When complete crowding out occurs, fiscal policy is ineffective, changing only interest rates, not output.
• Crowding out is greater if:
– Money demand is very sensitive to income changes
– Money demand is not very sensitive to interest rate changes
Monetary Policy and Liquidity Traps
In a liquidity trap, increases
in the money supply do not
decrease interest rates, so
investment and output do
not increase.
The RBI increases the
money supply which
decreases interest rates
and increases investment
and output.
Y1
IS
LM0
Aggregate Output
Y0
r0
r1
LM1
IS
LM0
Aggregate Output
Y0
r0
LM1
Ineffective Monetary Policy
• Investment is not sensitive to the interest rate
– If investment does not respond to interest rate changes (the IS curve is steep), monetary policy in ineffective in changing output.
• Liquidity trap
– If increases in the money supply fail to lower interest rates, monetary policy is ineffective in increasing output.
Interaction between monetary and fiscal policy
• IS-LM Model: Monetary and fiscal policy variables (M, G, and T) are exogenous.
• Real world: Monetary policymakers may adjust Min response to changes in fiscal policy, or vice versa.
• Such responses by the central bank may affect the effectiveness of fiscal policy
The RBI’s response to G > 0
• Suppose the government increases G.
• Possible RBI responses:
1. hold M constant
2. hold r constant
3. hold Y constant
• In each case, the effects of G on Yare different…
When G increases,
the IS curve shifts right.
IS1
Response 1: Hold M constant
Y
rLM
r1
Y1
IS2
Y2
r2
If RBI holds M constant,
then LM curve does not
shift.
As a result, interest rates
rise. This has a crowding-
out effect. Consequently,
GDP increases, but not a
lot.
Response 2: Hold r constant
If Govt. raises G,
the IS curve shifts right.
To keep r constant, Fed
increases M
to shift LM curve right.
Results:
3 1Y Y Y
0r
Y
r
IS1
IS2
LM1
LM2
Y1 Y2 Y3
r2
r1
Response 3: Hold Y constant
To keep Y constant, RBI
reduces M
to shift LM curve left.
0Y
3 1r r r
If Govt. raises G,
the IS curve shifts right.
IS1
Y
rLM1
r3
r1
LM2
Y2Y1
IS2
r2
Shocks in the IS-LM model
IS shocks: exogenous changes in the demand for goods & services.
Examples: – stock market boom or crash
change in households’ wealthC
– change in business or consumer confidence or expectations
I and/or C
Shocks in the IS-LM model
LM shocks: exogenous changes in the demand for money.
Examples:– a wave of credit card fraud increases demand
for money.
– more ATMs or the Internet reduce money demand.
Analyze shocks with the IS-LM Model
Use the IS-LM model to analyze the effects of
1. a boom in the stock market that makes consumers wealthier.
2. after a wave of credit card fraud, consumers using cash more frequently in transactions.
For each shock,
a. use the IS-LM diagram to show the effects of the shock on Y and r.
b. determine what happens to C, I, and the unemployment rate.
Macroeconomic equilibrium and policy
The two policies are not independent, as they bothaffect the endogenous variables:
The interest rate i
Income Y
Hence the idea of a policy mix…
3 examples of policy mix issues
The good: the Clinton deficit reduction in 1993,
The bad: the German reunification in 1992,
The ugly : the debate on the “liquidity trap”.
LM’
Macroeconomic equilibrium and policy
1. Clinton decides to reduce the US
deficit (by increasing taxes) , which
shifts IS to the left
3. The end result is that output is held
constant, with a strong fall in interest
rates
2. At the same time, Alan Greenspan
increases money supply in order to
stimulate output
IS’
LM
Income, Output Y
Inte
rest ra
tei
Y2
i2
Y1
i3
IS
The Clinton deficit reduction in 1993
i1
IS’
LM
Macroeconomic equilibrium and policy
1. The German reunification resulted in
a large shift of IS to the right, mainly
because of the extra government
spending and increase in consumption
from the ex DDR
3. The end result of this lack of
coordination is that output was slightly
reduced, with a large increase in
interest rates.
2. At the same time, the Bundesbank
drastically reduced money supply due
to inflation fears, as the ostmark/DM
exchange rate had been set at 1 for 1
due to political reasons
IS
LM’
Income, Output Y
Inte
rest ra
tei
Y2
i2
Y1
i1
The German reunification in 1992
i3
IS’
LM’
Macroeconomic equilibrium and policy
1. The subprime-based financial crisis
has frozen credit markets as well as
depressed consumption. This has
caused a large fall in investment,
shifting IS to the left
3. But these policies have had no
effect, and the rate of interest is
practically zero (ZIRP!)
2. The central bank have responded by
injecting large amounts of liquidity in
the markets, and making credit easily
available(“Quantitative easing”). This
pushes LM to the right.
IS
LM
Income, Output Y
Inte
rest ra
tei
Y1
i1
Y2
i2
The current liquidity trap ?
3. The only way out is a large fiscal
policy push.