Date post: | 31-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jerry-procter |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
POLS 125POLS 125Political Parties & ElectionsPolitical Parties & Elections
Lib-er-alLib-er-al [lib-er-uh l][lib-er-uh l] : Open-minded : Open-minded or tolerant, especially free and not or tolerant, especially free and not bound by traditional or conventional bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.ideas, values, etc.
Con-serv-a-tiveCon-serv-a-tive [kuh n-sur-vuh-tiv][kuh n-sur-vuh-tiv] : : Disposed to preserve existing Disposed to preserve existing conditions, and institutions, or to conditions, and institutions, or to restore traditional ones, and to limit restore traditional ones, and to limit change.change.
What do these terms mean?What do these terms mean?
X
Political IdeologyPolitical Ideology
LIBERALISM:LIBERALISM: A belief in the positive A belief in the positive uses of government to bring about uses of government to bring about justice and equality of opportunity. justice and equality of opportunity.
CONSERVATISM:CONSERVATISM: A belief that limited A belief that limited government ensures order, government ensures order, competitive markets, and personal competitive markets, and personal opportunity.opportunity.
A Working DefinitionA Working Definition
LIBERALLIBERAL CONSERVATIVCONSERVATIVEE
MODERATEMODERATE
Is a single dimension really adequate?Is a single dimension really adequate?
SO
CIA
L P
OLIC
YS
OC
IAL P
OLIC
Y
ECONOMIC POLICYECONOMIC POLICY
Government Control
Government Control
Freedom
Social and political liberals favor
limited government regulation of
individual behavior
Social and political conservatives favor broad government
regulation of individual behavior
Economic conservatives favor fiscal responsibility and limited government involvement in economic policymaking and regulation of business
Economic liberals favor spending and broad
government involvement in economic policymaking and
regulation of business
CONSERVATIVECONSERVATIVE STATISTSTATIST
LIBERTARIANLIBERTARIAN LIBERALLIBERAL
CENTRISTCENTRIST
A Primer on Party FactionsA Primer on Party Factions
““New Democrats”New Democrats” – Centrists who take liberal positions on social – Centrists who take liberal positions on social issues, and conservative positions on economic issues, organized as issues, and conservative positions on economic issues, organized as members of the Democratic Leadership Council (e.g., Bill Clinton)members of the Democratic Leadership Council (e.g., Bill Clinton)
““Blue Dog Democrats”Blue Dog Democrats” – Choked “blue” by the party’s more liberal – Choked “blue” by the party’s more liberal leadership, a group that pushes an agenda of social conservatism leadership, a group that pushes an agenda of social conservatism and fiscal responsibilityand fiscal responsibility
““Boll Weevils”Boll Weevils” – 1980s term for socially conservative southern – 1980s term for socially conservative southern Democrats Democrats
““Dixiecrats”Dixiecrats” – 1950s term for socially conservative southern – 1950s term for socially conservative southern DemocratsDemocrats
““DINOs”DINOs” – Democrats-in-name-only (e.g., Zell Miller, Joe Lieberman) – Democrats-in-name-only (e.g., Zell Miller, Joe Lieberman) ““Progressives”Progressives” – Preferred term for those who find the “L-word” – Preferred term for those who find the “L-word”
(liberal) pejorative(liberal) pejorative
The Democratic PartyThe Democratic Party
A Primer on Party FactionsA Primer on Party Factions
““Rockefeller Republicans”Rockefeller Republicans” – 1970s term for those who were socially – 1970s term for those who were socially liberal, pro-business, and conservative on foreign policy, willing to liberal, pro-business, and conservative on foreign policy, willing to raise taxes instead of running deficits. The social conservatism of the raise taxes instead of running deficits. The social conservatism of the Reagan Revolution pushed them to the left edges of the partyReagan Revolution pushed them to the left edges of the party
““The Mod Squad”The Mod Squad” – Group of moderate, socially liberal U.S. Senators – Group of moderate, socially liberal U.S. Senators (e.g., Lincoln Chafee, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, etc.)(e.g., Lincoln Chafee, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, etc.)
““Gypsy Moths”Gypsy Moths” – Republican moderates from the North East and – Republican moderates from the North East and Midwest, 1980sMidwest, 1980s
““Log Cabin Republicans”Log Cabin Republicans” – Gay, lesbian, and bisexual supporters of the – Gay, lesbian, and bisexual supporters of the Republican PartyRepublican Party
““Neo-Cons”Neo-Cons” – Big government conservatives, foreign policy hawks – Big government conservatives, foreign policy hawks (e.g., Paul Wolfowitz)(e.g., Paul Wolfowitz)
““Pro-Cons”Pro-Cons” – a.k.a. “Progressive Conservatives,” fiscal conservatives, – a.k.a. “Progressive Conservatives,” fiscal conservatives, social moderates, foreign policy eagles (not hawks)social moderates, foreign policy eagles (not hawks)
““RINOs”RINOs” – Republicans-in-name-only (e.g., John McCain, Arlen Specter) – Republicans-in-name-only (e.g., John McCain, Arlen Specter)
The Republican PartyThe Republican Party
SO
CIA
L P
OLIC
YS
OC
IAL P
OLIC
Y
ECONOMIC POLICYECONOMIC POLICY
Government Control
Government Control
Freedom
DLCDemocratic
Party
Republican Party
G.W. Bush?
“Blue Dog” Democrats
“Mod Squad”
Bill ClintonSocial and political liberals favor
limited government regulation of
individual behavior
Social and political conservatives favor broad government
regulation of individual behavior
Economic conservatives favor fiscal responsibility and limited government involvement in economic policymaking and regulation of business
Economic liberals favor spending and broad
government involvement in economic policymaking and
regulation of business
“Pro-Cons”
FOREIGN FOREIGN POLICY?POLICY?
Political Ideology vs. Partisan Political Ideology vs. Partisan IdentificationIdentification
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 70
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Strong Democrat
Strong Republican
IndependentExtremely Liberal
Extremely Conservativ
e
Moderate
Percent responding Percent responding
Rebranding the Republican Rebranding the Republican PartyParty
Rebranding the Republican Rebranding the Republican PartyParty
Rebranding the Republican Rebranding the Republican PartyParty
Rebranding the Republican Rebranding the Republican PartyParty
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Perc
ent r
espo
ndin
g
Democrat Republican Independent Apolitical
Source: National Election Studies, various years.
Trends in Partisan Identification, 1952-Trends in Partisan Identification, 1952-20042004
Including “Leaners”Including “Leaners”