+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: susan-robbins
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
14
Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3
Transcript
Page 1: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

Populism and ProtestThe Plight of the Farmers

Section 4.3

Page 2: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.
Page 3: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What was the Populist (People’s) party?

• Third party• Coalition of farmers,

laborers, reformers• Favored:

–Immigration restrictions

–Shorter workday–Bimetalism (Both gold

and silver coins)

Page 4: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

Homestead Act

Page 5: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What happened to farmers in the 1880s?

• Homestead Act

• New farming methods

• New machinery

• So things were going well, right?

• NO

Page 6: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What happened to farmers in the 1880s, continued…

• overproduction – led to falling prices

• heavy mortgages, high tariffs, high transportation prices

• widespread poverty, natural disasters, loneliness

Page 7: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.
Page 8: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What should the farmers have done?What factors might hinder them (that would not hinder an urban worker)?

Page 9: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

Who were the Grangers? (1867)• Farmers union

• Held mass meetings

• Pooled money together – purchase supplies,

equipment, negotiate

• Lobbied Midwestern legislatures for Granger laws regulating:

– Rates charged by RR,

– Grain operators

To which side of the political spectrum are the Grangers leaning?

Page 10: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What is significant about the Munn v. Illinois case of 1877? (Not in text)

• Supreme Court upheld right of Illinois to regulate private property– Giant elevators used for

grain • Decision restricts railroads

from using predatory (monopolistic) business practices against small merchants– Rebates and discounts for

huge hauls

Page 11: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What does this decision indicate regarding government’s role in

the economy?

• Are they leaning right, left, in the middle?

• Are they becoming liberal, conservative?

• What element (main concept) of pure capitalism is starting to be changed?

Radical Liberal Conservative Reactionary

Page 12: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What did the Supreme Court decision in the Wabash case (1886) do to Munn v

Illinois?• Judicial Review destroyed it• Railroad lawyers argued Article I,

Section 8, Clause 3 of the US Constitution– That Congress (NOT STATES)

shall have the power:• To regulate commerce with

foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes

Whose side is the Supreme Court on in this case?

Page 13: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

What were the results of the Wabash case?

• Interstate Commerce Commission (1887) created

– Congress asserts its right to regulate interstate trade

• A weak law

• Cleveland was laissez-faire

• Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890

– Prohibited monopolies restraints in trade

• Circumvented by monopolies

• Morphed into “holding companies”

• Not enforced by courts

Page 14: Populism and Protest The Plight of the Farmers Section 4.3.

Class work/Homework• Explain this political

cartoon.• Who would support

it? A farmer, or a businessman?

• What does it suggest about the railroad industry?

The AmericanFrankenstein1874


Recommended